ARF makes final proposal for dialogue with opposition

ArmenPress
April 5 2004

ARF MAKES FINAL PROPOSAL FOR DIALOGUE WITH OPPOSITION

YEREVAN, APRIL 5, ARMENPRESS: Senior members of the Armenian
Revolutionary Federation (ARF) have once again called on the
opposition today, which is bracing up for, as its says, “the final
battle,” to give up their “unconstitutional demands and display
tolerance,” in order to start seeking ways for reconciliation.
ARF representatives also issued a statement calling on the
country’s political forces to fit their actions into the limits set
by the Constitution and laws, to start a dialogue to diffuse the
escalating tension. The ARF statement says that the accord between
the warring parties can be reached in what is related to creating a
new electoral system, carrying out constitutional changes and in the
fight against corruption. The statement also says that the dialogue
and accord must be guaranteed by the ruling coalition, of which ARF
is a member.
ARF top official, Armen Rustamian, said that compromises are
required from both sides to avert the confrontation. He also argued
that a shattered domestic stability will harm the efforts to resolve
the Karabagh conflict. “Before taking a step we shall have to
calculate all possible consequences,” he said.
Rustamian also ruled out the role of foreign powers in the
escalated domestic tension. According to him, unlike the neighboring
Georgia, Armenia’s president has its support base in the person of
the coalition government, adding that the government has all
necessary levers and resources to counter the opposition’s efforts to
make a revolution at whatever the cost.
According to another senior ARF member, Levon Mkrtchian, judging
from the opposition’s radical announcements there is no room left for
a dialogue. “Under such conditions the authorities have to take all
steps to ensure stability,” he concluded.

Euro Parl. Reaffirms Pre-Eminence of Copenhagen Political Criteria

EUROPEAN ARMENIAN FEDERATION
for Justice and Democracy
Avenue de la Renaissance 10
B – 1000 BRUXELLES
Tel./Fax : +32 (0) 2 732 70 27
E-mail : [email protected]
Web :

PRESS RELEASE
April 3rd, 2004
Contact: Talline Tachdjian
Tel.: +32 (0)2 732 70 27

EUROPE / TURKEY: THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT REAFFIRMS
THE ABSOLUTE PRE-EMINENCE OF COPENHAGEN POLITICAL CRITERIA

– Reiterates the 1987 resolution on the Armenian genocide
– Rejects proposals to waive Copenhagen criteria
– Refuses `Privileged partnership’ as alternative to membership
– Questions `absorption capability’ of the European Union, for the first
time

Brussels, Belgium – On Thursday April 1st 2004, the European Parliament
(EP) examined and adopted the draft resolution on `Turkey’s progress
towards accession’, prepared by Mr Oostlander (PPE
(Christian-Democrat)/Netherlands), announced the European Armenian
Federation for Justice and Democracy (FEAJD).

The European Commissioner responsible for Enlargement, Mr Verheugen, made a
point of attending the debates and explaining the status of the outstanding
negotiations on Cyprus. Nevertheless he affirmed that simply modifying
existing laws without taking action to implement those statutes is not
enough for Turkey. `We also want a change of practice […] We constantly
receive information that demonstrates that the reforms process is only
accepted with hesitation by the Turkish administration’, he declared.

The Armenian Genocide issue was raised specifically by Mrs. Ainardi (GUE,
Group of the European United Left- France), Mrs. Roure (PSE, Party of
European Socialists-France), and Mrs. Schleicher (PPE, Germany).

Mrs Roure mentioned notably that it is difficult to understand `how a
country can join the Union while denying its history and its mistakes. We
therefore expect Turkey to carry out its responsibility toward history and
we will remind Turkey of that at every opportunity.’

Mrs. Schleicher, Chairwoman of the Delegation to the EU-South Caucasus
Parliamentary Cooperation Committees also indicated that by the economic
boycott and the closing of the border with Armenia, Turkey was guilty of
serious violations of the Balladur principles [1]’. She added that `Turkey
had worked to exclude Armenia Baku-Ceyhan pipeline route’ and that `it
contributed thus to increase regional instability’. She concluded that
Armenia `could not have confidence in Turkey under these conditions’.

Mr. Katiforis (PSE, Greece) then noted the Ministry of Education’s
revisionist directive requiring schoolchildren to compose essays `filled
with fanaticism directed towards certain minorities.’

A total of 41 amendments to the Turkey accession legislation were presented
and voted on. Amendments emanating from the Green and Liberal parties
proposing to begin negotiations prior to meeting the requirements of the
`Copenhagen Criteria’ were rejected. Others suggesting that the EU extend a
`privileged partnership’ status to Turkey, during such time that it falls
short of the Copenhagen criteria were also rejected. Finally, the
Parliament voted in support of its initial position, which calls for strict
compliance to the `Copenhagen criteria.’

Concerning the Armenian Genocide and the blockade of Armenia, the EP
maintained the paragraphs adopted by its Committee on Foreign Affairs on
March 17. They stipulate in particular that:

– The EP `requests Turkey to reopen the borders with Armenia and to promote
good neighborly relations with Armenia, to work together to promote
equitable solutions to regional conflicts and not to take any action that
would stand in the way of a historic reconciliation’.

– The EP `would like a dialogue to be established between Turkish and
Armenian academics, social and non-governmental organizations in order to
overcome the tragic experiences of the past as has been expressed in its
earlier resolutions (of 18 June 1987, 15 November 2000, 28 February 2002
and 26 February 2004).’

The PPE (Christians Democrats) and the PSE (Party of European Socialists)
were successful in blocking an amendment introduced by Mrs. Roure and 31
other deputies that aimed to reinforce the idea of Turkey’s responsibility
to begin a dialogue with Armenian people.

Euro-deputies also rejected Mr Coûteaux’s (EDD, France) amendment,
proposing to submit the question of Turkey’s membership to the European
nations by way of referendum. They did, however, make a point of
indicating that the European Commission had to fully take into
consideration `the capacity of the Union to absorb new members’ as
stipulated within the `Copenhagen Criteria.’

In return, the PSE amendment calling on Turkey to sign and to ratify the
statutes of the International Criminal Court was adopted.

The European Parliament adopted the legislation on Turkey’s progress toward
accession by a final vote of 211 in favor, 84 against and 46 abstentions.

`The direct reference to the resolution of 1987, as well as resolutions
adopted in 2000, 2002 and 2004 is a clear victory. For many years, Turkey
has led a large-scale shameful campaign aimed at burying the Armenian
Genocide recognition issue by the EP. It is unfortunate, however, that the
use of the words `blockade’ and `genocide’ remain a taboo,’ explained Hilda
Tchoboian, chairperson of the European Armenian Federation. `It is
particularly troubling to hear EP deputies vote against a measure which
would allow their constituents to speak out on the Turkey accession
issue. We should not be adopting Turkey’s traditions of non-transparency
in government.’

`On the other hand, the European Armenian Federation is pleased to see that
the concept of the Union’s `absorption capacity’ of the Union is
appropriately questioned for the first time. The Federation shares the
Parliamentarians’ concern that Turkey’s membership would cause
uncertainties in the Union’s political, economic, social and cultural
circles, calling the very principle of its integration into question. It
stresses that if Europeans want to believe in Europe again, the European
representatives should work to send a clear signal to European leaders,
that the Union’s membership demands should be scrupulously examined not
according to the opportunities and pressures of the moment, but with
respect to fundamental European values,’ explained Tchoboian.

#####

http://www.eafjd.org

USA not to deploy troops in Azerbaijan – US general tells Armenians

USA not to deploy troops in Azerbaijan – US general tells Armenians

Mediamax news agency
31 Mar 04

YEREVAN

“The United States is proud that Armenia is our friend in the fight
against terrorism,” Director of Plans and Policy, Headquarters US
European Command, Maj-Gen Jeffrey B. Kohler said in Yerevan today.

Gen Kohler said that he expressed his gratitude to the leadership of
the Armenian armed forces for taking part in the peacekeeping
operation in Kosovo, our Mediamax correspondent reports.

The US EUCOM representative noted that Armenian servicemen would also
take part in the restoration of Iraq in the near future. He said in
particular that “at present we are discussing the stationing of
Armenian sappers in Iraq”.

Jeffrey Kohler said that he discussed bilateral Armenian-American
military cooperation with the Armenian defence minister and with the
chief of the general staff of the Armenian armed forces.

“We need some time to better understand the opportunities and
requirements of the Armenian armed forces,” the American general said.

Director of Plans and Policy, Headquarters US European Command,
Maj-Gen Jeffrey B. Kohler gave a high assessment of the actions of the
Armenian peacekeepers in Kosovo.

The American general pointed out that the Armenian servicemen showed
their worth during the recent outburst of violence in Kosovo.

“The Armenian people can be proud of their peacekeepers,” Jeffrey
Kohler said.

The US EUCOM representative recalled that the United States had taken
part in the training of the Armenian peacekeeping battalion. He said
in particular that the American side had organized courses for the
Armenian peacekeepers and provided them with equipment.

Gen Kohler also said that he discussed with the Armenian military
leadership the prospects for US assistance to the Armenian
peacekeeping battalion.

Jeffrey B. Kohler added that “the United States is not going station
its troops in Azerbaijan”.

The American general pointed out that “we do not have plans and needs
to station troops in Azerbaijan,” Mediamax reports.

BAKU: Armitage Says US Has No Desire To Establish Base In Azerbaijan

Baku Today, Azerbaijan
March 28 2004

US Diplomat Says His Country Has No Desire To Establish Base In
Azerbaijan

Richard Armitage, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State, said on Saturday
that he had not discussed military bases with President Ilham Aliyev
because his country has `no desire’ to set up bases in Azerbaijan.

Armitage, who arrived Baku late Friday on the last leg of his trip to
Ukraine, Armenia and Azerbaijan, thanked Aliyev for his support in
Iraq and Afghanistan.

He said cooperation in so called U.S.-led war against terror and also
Azerbaijan’s support for the U.S. in Iraq and Afghanistan, where Baku
has sent peacekeepers, was proof of a good military relationship
between the United States and a Muslim country.

The visit came amid continued planning for a global realignment of
U.S. forces that could result in more U.S. military activity in
former republics and satellites of the former Soviet Union.

Armitage, who also met with opposition leaders, reiterated U.S.
concerns about what the opposition calls a crackdown on dissent and
independent media. But he did not play up the problems, saying that
Aliev agrees that there must be independent media.

He said that “the human rights situation is certainly not as good as
it could or should be. But it’s not a permanent situation and we have
no doubt that it will change, change
for the better.”

Armitage said that a settlement of the lingering conflict between
Armenian and Azerbaijan over the Nagorno-Karabakh cannot be imposed
from above by outside forces.

“It has to be a lasting and durable solution, and it has to be
something the two sides agree on,” he said. He said an international
mediating group that includes Russia and
the United States “has some new ideas” on the issue, but did not
reveal them.

Nagorno-Karabakh, a mostly ethnic-Armenian populated western region
of Azerbaijan, was occupied by Armenia in 1991-94 war. Armenian
troops also took control over Azerbaijan’s seven administrative
districts – Lachin, Kelbejer, Aghdam, Fuzuli, Jebrail, Zengilan and
Gubadli – surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh.

As a result of the war, over 700,000 Azeris left their homes in the
occupied territories. Azerbaijan was also subjected to a heavy burden
of more 400,000-refugee population that fled Armenia.

Around 400,000 ethnic-Armenians also had to move from their homes in
Baku and Azerbaijan’s other districts after Nagorno-Karabakh began
demanding unification with Armenia in 1988.

A cease-fire was signed between the two countries in 1994, but no
agreement has been reached on the territory’s final status yet.

BAKU: Aliyev rules out NK solution if Turkey opens Armenian border

Azeri leader rules out Karabakh solution if Turkey opens Armenian border

ANS TV, Baku
24 Mar 04

[Correspondent at Baku’s Heydar Aliyev airport] Mr President [Ilham
Aliyev], the opening of the Turkish-Armenian border has recently been
on the agenda. The issue became topical again after Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s visit to the USA. Is there any option
on the agenda? Are you aware of these issues as Azerbaijan’s
president? Can we assume that Turkey will take such a step?

[Ilham Aliyev speaking to microphone] I do not want to make assumptions.
I talked to Mr Erdogan on this subject when I visited Ankara as prime
minister. The prime minister and Foreign Minister [Abdullah] Gul
reassured me that Turkey will never open its border with Armenia until
the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict is resolved. This is enough for me. I
do not need any other explanation if I heard this myself. But I should
say that the European Union and some other fairly influential
countries in the world are exerting strong pressure on Turkey to make
it open the border. I have repeatedly told the meetings with relevant
sides that a Nagornyy Karabakh resolution will be generally impossible
if Turkey opens its border with Armenia. Because Azerbaijan will have
lost an important lever and then peaceful negotiations will generally
fail. This will stop the negotiations and lead to unpleasant
results. For this reason, if the sides interested in the issue want a
peaceful solution to the problem, then they should not put pressure on
Turkey. Turkey is a big and strong state. I am convinced that Turkey
will cope with all this pressure. Turkish-Azerbaijani fraternity is
above everything for us and the Turkish people.

Bay Area ANC Welcomes Khandjian and Morgenthau

PRESS RELEASE
Armenian National Committee
San Francisco – Bay Area
51 Commonwealth Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94118
Tel: (415) 387-3433
Fax: (415) 751-0617
[email protected]

Contact: Roxanne Makasdjian (415) 641-0525

March 19, 2004

Bay Area ANC Welcomes Khandjian and Morgenthau

Actress Arsinée Khandjian and Dr. Henry Morgenthau IV discuss Hai Tad
Prof. Stephan Astourian and Prof. Armen Der Kiureghian Honored

San Francisco, March 6, 2004 — Actress Arsinée Khandjian was the special
guest at the annual Bay Area Armenian National Committee’s `Hai Tad
Evening,’ along with pediatrician Henry `Ben’ Morgenthau IV, great-grandson
of the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey in 1915. The evening also highlighted the
Bay Area ANC’s accomplishments of the past year, and honored two Bay Area
professors, Stephan Astourian and Armen Der Kiureghian as `local heroes.’

Famed Canadian-Armenian actress Arsinée Khandjian spoke about the artist’s
role in Hai Tad, the Armenian Cause. Khandjian, who has acted extensively
in feature films, on stage and television, and has received many awards,
including the Genie award (the Canadian Academy Award), used her experience
in the feature film `ARARAT,’ to speak about her role and the film’s role in
Hai Tad. She said that historically, artwork which runs counter to the
accepted political ideology is often labeled as `propaganda.’ In
discussions with her husband, film director Atom Egoyan, about how to
approach the subject of the Armenian Genocide on film, Khandjian said they
were faced with the question of `how to remember’ the story of the Genocide.
She said that for some people, merely the step of making the film was a
political act. `They felt that not only had we decided to remember the
Genocide, but we were also suggesting how to remember it,’ said Khandjian.

Khandjian said `ARARAT’ was first and foremost a work of art, but she quoted
from Egoyan words to illustrate all the issues he wanted to address in the
film. `…the screenplay had to tell the story of what happened, why it
happened, why it’s denied, why it continues to happen, and what happens when
you continue to deny.’ Khandjian said that the filmmaker did not feel the
need to prove the Genocide happened. `The only concern was to find a way to
give voice to a true history, to retrieve it from oblivion and make the
viewers ask themselves why they have never heard of it. These were the
obligations felt by the filmmaker.’

Khandjian recognized that the film `ARARAT’ has become a political
instrument, supported or rejected because of its subject matter. She said
she regarded these reactions as inevitable, but that they do `…suggest that
as artists, we, nonetheless, have to be prepared to enter into political
discourse and sometimes directly so.’

As an example, Khandjian discussed the political maneuverings surrounding
the possibility of `ARARAT’s screening in Turkey. She described how the
Turkish Minister of Culture had announced that the film would be screened in
Turkey, but that shortly after, `Turkey’s Nationalist Action Party had said
that any individual choosing to attend screenings of the film would suffer
the consequences of the decision to shame Turkey by paying dearly with his
or her life.’ This latter development (which resulted in the cancellation of
the film’s release in Turkey), was not reported in the press, while the
former announcement by the Minister of Culture had been widely reported
through the Associated Press. Khandjian saw this as yet another boost for
the deception by the Turkish government, which deserved to be exposed to the
International community.

After many attempts to capture the attention of various Armenian
organizations and individuals, Khandjian said it was only the Toronto ANC’s
Aris Babikian who took the issue on. `He was the one person who listened
carefully to what I was proposing as an opportunity and as an approach to
turn the situation around in our interest. I am thankful and humbled by his
generosity to commit the time and effort to this cause.’ Khandjian said
that after Babikian contacted every Toronto newspaper editor, journalists
began taking an interest.

Khandjian quoted Canada’s top newspaper, The Globe and Mail, which wrote
under the headline `Blocking ARARAT,’ `The movie provides a test of the
country’s political maturity at a time when Turkey is pressing to join the
European Union. Turkey is failing the test.’ Soon after, the ANCA
Washington headquarters and Western Region offices took it upon themselves
to alert the American press, said Khandjian, after which both the New York
Times and Los Angeles Times reported on the blocking of the film in Turkey.

Stressing that the purpose in making `ARARAT’ for Khandjian and Egoyan was
to explore `the very essence of what we have to carry on as an identity in
our lives,’ Khandjian recognized `the power of art to reach the heart and
the mind of humanity. If we played a role in Hai Tad, it was only because
we first and foremost believed in the need to tell our story as we know it.’
Khandjian called on Armenian institutions and artists to recognize and
validate each other’s contributions and strengthen communication between them.

Henry Morgenthau IV also addressed the crowd at `Hai Tad’ evening, saying
that his family was always around Armenians while he was growing up in
Boston. `At my Bar Mitzvah there were Armenians, and at April 24th, there
were Morgenthaus,’ said Morgenthau IV, who has earned a BS degree from Yale,
a Master’s degree in Public Policy from the University of Pennsylvania, his
medical credentials from Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York,
and is presently practicing pediatrics for the sickest children in San
Francisco hospitals. He has also produced films, campaigned for
congressional candidates and has worked in organizations promoting health
care reform and low-income housing.

Morgenthau IV spoke about the history of the Morgenthau family, which
achieved great political and financial success, after many booms and busts
in the business world. He described his great-grandfather as outwardly very
jovial and cheerful, but very disciplined in his private life. `Financial
success should not be a goal in itself,’ was one of Morgenthau’s maxims, he
said, which drove his great-grandfather’s purpose to do good in the world.
He spoke of the elder Morgenthau’s permanent legacy of adhering to
principles, which gave him the courage to stand up for the Armenians.

Speaking about his trip to Armenia with his father in April, 1999 at the
invitation of the Armenian National Institute, Morgenthau said, `It was the
spontaneous outpouring of affection from the Armenian people which still
stays with me from that trip. My father writes that he felt almost as
though he were the ambassador during that trip.’

`These experiences have instilled in me a desire to continue Ambassador
Morgenthau’s legacy…’ said Morgenthau IV. He said that if his
great-grandfather were alive today, he knows he would continue to fight for
official recognition of the Armenian Genocide, but that he would also `be
quick to recognize the vulnerability’ of Armenia at present, and would see
new opportunities for Armenia.

In his introduction to Morgenthau IV, Bay Area ANC member Mark Markarian
said that Morgenthau’s grandfather, Henry Morgenthau Jr. was U.S. Secretary
of the Treasury during WWI, during which time he worked on behalf of the
Jews facing the Holocaust. Morgenthau Jr. initiated a U.S. Treasury program
which funded Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg’s trip to Budapest, where he
saved the lives of tens of thousands of Hungarian Jews. Ironically, those
rescued Jews included Bay Area Congressman Tom Lantos, one of the most
vociferous opponents of Armenian Genocide recognition in Congress.

Honored as `local heroes’ at the event were Professor Stephan Astourian, the
Executive Director of the Armenian Studies Program at U.C. Berkeley, and
U.C. Berkeley Engineering Professor Armen Der Kiureghian. Introducing Prof.
Astourian, ANC member and U.C. Berkeley Armenian Students Association
co-president Hasmig Tatiossian introduced her professor as someone who had
helped instill in her a keen interest in Armenian history and politics.
Astourian arrived at U.C. Berkeley as a visiting professor six years ago
and was able to swiftly raise the status of Armenian Studies at the
university to a full-fledged program, integrating it into the broader
university and linking it with other departments on campus. His courses are
praised for their rigor and content, and Astourian has volunteered his time
to provide community lectures and testify before the government bodies on
issues of history and Armenian Genocide education. Tatiossian praised
Astourian on behalf of the ANC as someone whose presence, scholarship, and
service in the academic arena is making strong, enduring contributions to
the Armenian Cause.

Introducing Professor Armen Der Kiureghian, ANC member and American
University of Armenia staff member Gohar Momjian, described Der Kiureghian’s
many contributions to the Bay Area community and to Armenia. Der Kiureghian
was the initiator and founding member of the American University of Armenia,
and using his expertise in civil engineering and seismic safety, he helped
Armenia greatly after its devastating 1988 earthquake, and established AUA’s
Engineering Research Center, acquiring funding for the research work of more
than 100 scientists in Armenia. Der Kuireghian was instrumental in
establishing the Armenian Studies Program at U.C. Berkeley, and has
spearheaded efforts to prevent Armenian Genocide denial on campus. For
these major contributions and the many more ways Professor Der Kiureghian
has been involved in the preservation and vibrancy of the Armenian community
here and abroad, the Bay Area ANC presented him with its `local hero’ award.

Speaking on behalf of the Bay Area ANC, Roxanne Makasdjian outlined the
committee’s key initiatives of the past year. Describing the various
actions taken to achieve recognition of the Armenian Genocide, Makasdjian
said, `With the atmosphere of terrorism which surrounds us today, our
message becomes clearer than ever before: that when the U.S. covers up for
the faults of its friends, it is seen by the rest of the world as
hypocritical, selfish, and fraudulent – and its message of human rights,
democracy, and justice for all is looked upon as a sham, which sews hatred
and resentment among those it says it seeks to save.’ Makasdjian listed the
various Bay Area genocide resolutions the ANC helped pass, the Armenian
Genocide film screening it organized, the publicity it helped generate
around the book `Burning Tigris’ and film `ARARAT,’ relationships with local
press surrounding their coverage of the Genocide, and the progress of the
Bay Area ANC’s Genocide Education Project. Makasdjian presented the
Project’s newly published lesson plans, `Human Rights and Genocide: A Case
Study of the First Genocide of the 20th Century,’ and discussed the success
of new educational website, `TeachGenocide.org’

Makasdjian also updated those present on ANC’s local political advocacy
efforts, including its Mayoral Candidates Forum, and the committee’s
outreach to university students. She also spoke of the newest problem to
arise on the federal level – the Bush administration’s proposal to increase
military aid to Azerbaijan, giving it approximately three-times the amount
offered to Armenia. Makasdjian urged the audience to support the ANC’s
efforts to persuade Congress against making such unbalanced appropriations
which dangerously effect Armenia’s national security.

Of special note at `Hai Tad Evening’ was the attendance of former California
Supreme Court Justice Armand Arabian. Makasdjian noted that this Spring,
Arabian will be awarded the prestigious Ellis Island Medal of Honor, as
someone from an immigrant community who has achieved so much. Also
recognized for their generosity were the many Bay Area Armenian-American
community members who have contributed financially to the committee’s
ongoing activities.

###

Full Speech by Arsinée Khandjian at Bay Area ANC `Hai Tad Evening’:

PICTURE CAPTION:
Left to right: Bay Area ANC Representative Roxanne Makasdjian, Actress
Arsinée Khandjian, Professor Stephan Astourian, Dr. Henry Morgenthau IV, and
Professor Armen Der Kiureghian

http://www.ancsf.org/press_releases/2004/3192004.htm
http://www.ancsf.org/press_releases/2004/khandjian_speech.htm
www.ancsf.org
www.TeachGenocide.org

Where was flight N4610 heading?

Independent Online, South Africa
March 10 2004

Where was flight N4610 heading?

They were 64 “heavily built men”, mostly white. No, they were all
black. No, only 40 of them were black.

The plane left South Africa illegally from Wonderboom airport,
strayed into Zimbabwe airspace and was ordered down. No, the plane
left the country legally, having filed a flight plan to Harare and
then on to Burundi. No, the plane was headed for the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC).

The men on board were suspected of being mercenaries hired to
overthrow Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe. No, they were on their
way to overthrow the government of Equatorial Guinea. No, they were
going to the eastern DRC to carry out security duties.

These are just some of the stories surrounding the flight of N4610, a
Boeing 727-100 cargo plane that has been impounded in Harare.

‘Those guys have never caught a fish in their lives’
And 64 – though some reports say there are 67 – of those who were
aboard, whether they were white, black or a mixture, and whether they
were mercenaries or honest men, are in Harare cells facing intense
interrogation.

Not even Frederick Forsyth thought of so many twists and riddles in
his Dogs of War, probably the best-known novel about mercenaries.

The book was based on Forsyth’s personal adventures – he was involved
in an unsuccessful scheme to overthrow the head of state of
Equatorial Guinea in 1972.

But even the Dogs of War cannot rival this bizarre tale of confusion.

Some sources say the drama began in November 2003 or December when
the company Logo Logistics acquired a fishing concession in
Equatorial Guinea and bought or hired fishing trawlers.

“Those guys have never caught a fish in their lives,” one source
said.

The trawlers were really to be used first to reconnoitre and then to
transport mercenaries to oust the government of unpopular President
Obiang Nguema Mbasogo in a coup, the sources said. Though part of
Equatorial Guinea is on the African mainland, its capital Malabo is
on the island of Bioko, and it appears that a seaborne coup was
planned, though it is not clear from what staging post it would
happen.

Equatorial Guinea and its immediate neighbouring island state of Sao
Tome and Principe have become ripe for coups since oil was recently
discovered in their waters. That has made them big prizes for greedy
politicians and those who help them to acquire power. Sao Tome
experienced a coup in 2003, which was reversed by African Union
intervention.

On Tuesday the Mbasogo government announced that it had arrested 15
“mercenaries” in Malabo, including white South Africans, black South
Africans of Angolan origin and a few people from Kazakhstan, some
Armenians and a German.

“It was connected with that plane in Zimbabwe. They were the advance
party of that group,” Information Minister Agustin Nse Nfumu said. He
said the 15 had been in the country since December.

The arrests in Malabo corroborate the account of South African
security sources that the real destination of the plane seized in
Harare was Equatorial Guinea, though other destinations have been
claimed.

South African civil aviation sources say Harare was on the aircraft’s
official flight plan – en route to Burundi.

On Tuesday, a company named in connection with the flight disputed
all the speculation, saying the “mercenaries” were in fact security
people “going to eastern DRC”.

They were stopping in Zimbabwe to pick up mining equipment, “Zimbabwe
being a vastly cheaper place for such”.

Charles Burrow, a senior executive of Logo Logistics which had
chartered the Boeing 727 freighter, said via telephone from London
that most of the people on board were South African and had military
experience, but were on contract to four mining companies in the DRC.
He declined to name the companies.

How then did the crew file a flight plan to Burundi?

Perhaps the most murky leg of the journey was the detour to Zimbabwe,
and there are several different explanations offered of how the plane
came to land in Harare.

One was that the Boeing 727-100 strayed into Zimbabwe airspace by
accident – either through a navigational error or a technical fault –
and another that it flew there deliberately.

Several Zimbabwean aviation sources initially said the plane was
forced to land after entering Zimbabwe airspace illegally. They said
the Airforce of Zimbabwe (AFZ) were alerted once the plane showed up
on radar screens. The AFZ has been on alert for years because of
Mugabe’s fears that his enemies might mount an attack to topple him.

Sources behind this theory say that, upon being questioned, the crew
indicated they had wanted to refuel urgently so they could proceed
with their journey. The plane was then allowed to land.

A problem arose when the crew were told that the plane was going to
be searched, according to this theory. They panicked and tried to
taxi off the runaway but the attempt to escape did not succeed. If it
had succeeded it probably could have caused a disaster as there was a
plane arriving from Johannesburg on the same route.

However, Burrow, the Logo Logistics executive, said the aircraft was
bound for the DRC to do mine security work and had stopped in Harare
to pick up mining security equipment.

A senior Zimbabwean aviation official, involved in the
investigations, said the suspected mercenaries had indeed informed
their interrogators in Harare that they had been hired by a South
African firm for a noble mission to do both mining and demining
security work in the DRC.

The official said Zimbabwean police, army and intelligence officials
were unconvinced by this explanation as many of the suspects had
shown little knowledge of demining work during interrogation. It was
possible that some of the equipment seized was used for mining work.

It is known, however, that it was at Wonderboom Airport that the crew
picked up its passengers, and interesting cargo.

Wonderboom Airport manager Peet van Rensburg confirmed that the plane
landed there early on Sunday morning and departed later that
afternoon with 64 men on board. It is not clear whether this number
included the three-man crew, but the flight plan filed indicated 67
people were on board.

Of these, at least 20 are believed to be South Africans, with the
majority coming from Pretoria and Johannesburg.

According to Van Rensburg, who was phoned by the duty airport
manager, the plane landed without prior notice, and took on
passengers and cargo.

But Craig Partridge of Air Traffic and Navigational Services (ATNS)
said four flight plans for the plane, registration number N4610, had
been filed with ATNS’s briefing office in Johannesburg.

According to the documents, he said, the plane left Lanseria Airport
at 6.55am on Sunday. There were four crew members on board and they
were headed for Wonderboom Airport in Pretoria, where they touched
down at 6.59am.

Van Rensburg said that when he arrived at the airport, he found the
plane parked on the maintenance runway.

He was told that scores of bags containing various “military-like”
equipment had been loaded onto the plane by the crew after the ground
crew’s help was refused.

Army-style duffel bags contained night vision equipment,
waterbottles, apparent gun cases, cylindrical metal tubes, camouflage
uniforms and boots, and two-way radios.

His inquiries also revealed that the plane had a limited amount of
fuel on board as the Wonderboom Airport runway, which is 1,83km in
length, is too short to allow a plane with full fuel load and cargo
to take off.

Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) spokesperson Moses Seate said the CAA
was conducting a probe into the circumstances of the plane’s
“illegal” departure from South African airspace.

But a flight plan filed with ATNS indicates that the plane flew to
Polokwane, an international airport, from where it would proceed to
Harare.

The plane arrived at Polokwane at 4.35pm. It parked on the main
international apron in front of the international departures building
which houses customs and immigration, Partridge said.

It then took off at 6.24pm, still with 67 people on board, according
to the paperwork, and headed for Harare.

“The air traffic controller on duty saw the men getting on board and
he described all of them as ‘non-white’,” said Partridge.

South African air control handed the plane over to air traffic
control in Harare when it crossed into Zimbabwean airspace at 6.40pm.

Partridge said a fourth flight plan on file shows that the aircraft
planned to leave Harare and fly on to Bujumbura, Burundi. However, it
was seized by Zimbabwean authorities.

A Zimbabwe official confirmed that the aircraft had, in fact, entered
Zimbabwean airspace legally on Sunday night after filing an earlier
flight plan. A problem arose when the crew made a false declaration
of its cargo and passengers.

A crew member allegedly attempted to bribe an airport security
official with wads of US dollars to avoid a search of the aircraft.
That only raised the anxiety of other security officials who
witnessed the bribery attempt, and a search was then mounted.

South African security sources offer another explanation – they also
say the aircraft flew deliberately to Harare, but with the purpose of
picking up Simon Mann, the head of Logo Logistics and leader of the
team heading for Equatorial Guinea, as well as some other members.

“But how they thought they could get away with that, I don’t know,”
one source said.

“The age of coups is past now, they must realise that. You could
probably take Equatorial Guinea with five people but the African
Union is not going to let a coup stand,” he added.

He said Nigerian troops had already been sent to Malabo to protect
Mbasogo’s government.

In 1999, the Organisation of African Unity passed a historic
resolution outlawing coups and resolved to banish from the
organisation any government that came to power by coup.

The men on Flight N4610 have been detained, their plane impounded,
and very little further information about the investigation is being
released.

It is understood the suspected mercenaries have been split up and are
being held at different places around Harare – Chikurubi Maximum
Prison, Harare Central Prison, Harare Central Police cells,
Rhodesville Police Station cells and army barracks around Harare.

They are being interviewed by different groups of interrogators, say
sources.

There is some concern among legal rights activists that the men may
be tortured to extract information.

It has not yet been confirmed whether any of the 64 arrested men on
board are, in fact, South Africans.

South African High Commissioner to Zimbabwe Jerry Ndou said his
office had written to Zimbabwe’s ministry of foreign affairs to ask
for information about the detainees. “Our interest is to confirm
whether or not any South Africans have been arrested,” he said.

“But part of the problem is that the cabinet is now in session and so
we have to wait for a reply. Anyway, we are hoping they will come
back to us as soon as possible,” he added.

Commenting on the delays in obtaining information, Ndou said: “I have
written to the ministry, and so there will be consultations with the
minister, the deputy minister, the administrator, the chief director,
all those people. It can be that at this stage we are just waiting on
the minister Stan Mudenge, who is in cabinet.”

Ndou said he needed to know the identities of the detainees so that
he could inform their families at home, and also offer them consular
services.

According to Ndou, the impounded plane has “made big news in the
state media”, with reports stating that Zimbabwe was under siege.

Equatorial Guinea is equally paranoid, believing that the
“mercenaries” were meant for a coup there.

Its information minister, Nfumu, said from Malabo that the suspected
mercenaries had arrived in the former Spanish colony, which borders
Gabon and Cameroon, in December and were picked up late on Monday
evening. He said some of them had been “presented to the diplomatic
corps”.

The clampdown comes amid growing tensions within Mbasogo’s family,
whose members hold most top positions in the country, and speculation
among exiled opposition politicians that a coup was in the offing.

But this could all be wrong: Logo Logistics, the company that leased
the plane on Harare’s tarmac, said it was carrying 64 mining
contractors to the DRC. It said that what had been described as
“military” items on board were, in fact, equipment such as boots, and
pipe-bending and wire-cutting tools.

“We can make it clear that we have no current or intended business in
Zimbabwe and certainly no illegal intentions against its government
and people,” the company said in a statement sent to Sapa.

It said the aircraft was recently purchased and still registered in
the United States. “There is no other link with the US,” the company
said.

So what’s the solution to all the mysteries? Easy. Frederick Forsyth
just needs to write Dogs of War II.