ECHO Research: majority of examined reports show no evidence of bias

ECHO Research: majority of examined TV-reports, radio-reports and
articles about elections in Armenia showed no evidence of reporting
bias

February 8, 2008

Yerevan /Mediamax/. Experts of the International ECHO Research Company
analyzed 743 TV-reports, radio-reports and newspaper articles,
published in Armenia within the first week of the pre-election
campaign, and came to the conclusion that 630 items from 743 showed no
evidence of reporting bias.

Mediamax reports that ECHO Research presented in Yerevan today the
report on the results of a media monitoring in Armenia. The European
Foundation for Democracy, based in Brussels, ordered the realization of
the monitoring. `MediaBrand’ Company was the partner of ECHO Research
in Armenia.

Presenting the report, the Director of ECHO Research Department Karen
Prichard called attention to an interesting fact: TV coverage was
overwhelmingly positive about the conduct of the elections, assessing
them as `democratic’ in virtually every item analyzed, whereas print
press judged their conduct as `undemocratic’ in almost 25% of cases.

The report notes that despite the `pro-government coverage’, the Public
TV of Armenia provided broadcast time to other candidates as well, as
legally required.

Karen Prichard noted that `the tenor of the often powerfully-worded
critiques of all candidates in the media implies a considerable degree
of freedom of expression’.

As to the volume of coverage in the media, during the first week of the
campaign, the Ex-President of Armenia Levon Ter-Petrosian was leading;
the second place was occupied by the Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisian.

All in all, the ECHO experts analyzed 390 newspaper items, 256 TV
reports and interviews and 97 radio reports and interviews and came to
the conclusion that in Armenia `heterogeneous media’ is present. `573
of the 743 items sourced took a balanced approach to each candidate
they discussed’, the report reads.

The ECHO experts came to the conclusion `that the conduct of the
elections themselves became perhaps the key electoral issue for the
media’. At that they noted that `the fact that the concerns as to the
possible undemocratic nature of the upcoming elections were so openly
reproduced, speaks strongly in favor of an uninhibited media sphere’.

The conclusion of the report reads:

`Clearly, Armenia is a country in transition. Its media sphere is not
perfect. However, media are not, for the most part, menaced by
political forces ` and when media comes under pressure, that pressure
is reported on’.

Deep State Coup Averted in Turkey

Fe bruary 9, 2008
Deep State Coup Averted in Turkey
by Christopher Deliso

balkanalysis.com

On 22 January, Turkish police arrested 33 individuals, some connected
with the military, in the largest concerted action against the "deep
state" – that shadowy underworld linking extremists and criminals from
the spheres of military, political, judicial and the academy. Some
were accused of belonging to an ultranationalist group, Ergenekon,
that was allegedly "preparing a series of bomb attacks aimed at
fomenting chaos ahead of a coup in 2009 against Turkey’s center-right
government, whose European Union-linked reforms are opposed by
ultranationalists." The ultranationalists (who also distrust the
Erdogan government for its alleged Islamist agenda) were plotting to
assassinate prominent cultural figures, such as Nobel-prize winning
novelist Orhan Pamuk, journalist Fehmi Koru, and possibly Kurdish
politicians. The deaths of Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, two Italian
priests and three Protestant missionaries have already been blamed on
ultranationalists associated with the Ergenekon group.

The police had been investigating the group for the past few years,
compiling in the process a dossier of some 7,000 pages. The current
operation was sparked following a police raid in Istanbul this past
summer, which recovered weapons (and some low-ranking military men).
But the big fish, including two retired generals, were only caught in
the recent police operation. While it seems to have been a major
victory for the government and for Turkey in general, many have
expressed cynicism that a completely thorough investigation will ever
be accomplished. Because the case involves high-ranking officials from
the military – that self-appointed guarantor of Turkey’s secular,
constitutional order – "it remains to be seen whether the cases will
be brought to trial," states the Guardian.

But it is not so simple as just a matter of upholding army pride. The
activities of the gang, which apparently ranged from false-flag
terrorist attacks and assassinations to drug smuggling and espionage,
are closely intertwined with the fortunes and affairs of the ruling
class in Turkey. As editors and local commentators have been saying,
to really act against the deep state is almost unimaginable; no one
knows where the trail might ultimately lead.

Deep Background: The Cold War, NATO and the Rise of the Deep State

We do, however, know where it started – and why. Indeed, it is more
than a bit ironic that the major recurring threat to society and
political stability in Turkey over the past 60 years, the "Deep
State," was actually enabled by the country’s Western allies, and
first of all, America. After WWII and with the creation of NATO, the
military alliance created "secret armies" throughout Europe,
consisting of so-called "stay behind" forces, charged with waging
sabotage campaigns and resistance in the case of a Soviet invasion.
However, they became prone to corruption, interference with domestic
politics and society, and were in some cases involved with brutality
against Leftists and the citizenry in general. While the most famous
of NATO’s secret armies was the Gladio operation in Italy, it was
arguable in Turkey that this dangerous policy had the most serious
long-term consequences, with the creation of a stay-behind force known
as the Counter-Guerrillas.

The core of this covert paramilitary force was made up of right-wing
radicals and fascists who espoused a narrative of inherent Turkish
greatness and racial superiority, in the context of not only Turkey
itself but of the ethnically Turkic republics of Central Asia (then
under Soviet control); there were also the fond dreams of the bygone
Ottoman Empire which, in its heyday, spread across the Middle East,
North Africa and the Balkans.

The Counter-Guerrillas were officially a part of the Turkish Army’s
Special Warfare Department, and housed in the US Military Aid Mission
building in Ankara, according to a Los Angeles Times report from 1998.
This department received funding and training from U.S. advisors to
establish, as in other NATO states,"stay behind" squads of civilian
irregulars who would theoretically vex the invading Soviets. Stocking
the staff was accomplished partially through a nationwide "youth
group," the Grey Wolves, established in 1969 under the aegis of the
Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) and its leader, Alparslan Türkes.
This Counter-Guerrilla member and ultranationalist politician dreamed
of creating the mythical "Turan" – a pan-Turkic empire which would
stretch through the Central Asian republics, and include the Uighur
Turks of western China’s Xinjiang province.

Naturally, the Counter-Guerrillas and Grey Wolves also operated
closely with Turkey’s intelligence service, the MIT, and were used by
right-wing governments to suppress civil liberties. Military coups in
1971 and 1980, and chronic massacres of civilian demonstrators
throughout the 1970s, were all led by Counter-Guerrilla/Grey Wolves
elements. The American intelligence services at times appear to have
been supportive, regardless of the ominous implications for democracy.
Immediately after the 1980 military coup that brought General Kenan
Evren to power, American CIA Ankara station chief Paul Henze
reportedly cabled Washington exulting, "our boys have done it." At
that time, the Grey Wolves had 200,000 registered members and one
million sympathizers nationwide, though the Turkish Deep State was
still in embryonic form compared to the decade that was to come.

When domestic political fortunes changed, important figures such as
Colonel Türkes, and other Grey Wolves were arrested. However, those
who volunteered to fight against Kurdish and Armenian groups were
often released. With the outbreak of war against the Kurdish PKK
(Partiya Karkerên Kurdistan, or Kurdistan Workers Party) in the 1980s,
the covert force turned to "black ops" such as torturing and killing
Kurds while disguised in PKK uniforms. Further, an Islamic terrorist
organization, Turkish Hizbollah (not related to Hizbollah in Lebanon)
was reportedly created by the Turkish military and the MIT in the
1980s, to divide the rebelling Kurds in the southeast. In all, up to
20,000 Islamic fighters, most of them Kurds, were indoctrinated and
organized into proxy terrorist and assassination squads. Throughout
the 1990s, Turkish Hizbollah murdered over 3,000 businessmen and
ordinary civilians in assassinations and bombings. This monstrous
creation was modeled on America’s apparent success in Afghanistan,
where it had created bin Laden’s mujahedin to fight the Soviets.

The state’s role with Turkish Hizbollah was confirmed in February
2000, when former Prime Minister Tansu Çiller admitted publicly that
she had ordered the military to arm the group six years earlier.
Çiller justified the jihadis as a necessary part of Turkey’s own war
on terror. In his book Crescent and Star: Turkey between Two Worlds,
the former New York Times bureau chief in Istanbul, Stephen Kinzer,
recounted Ms Çiller’s scandalous statements. "Yes, it was my signature
on the order to deliver those weapons," she said. "We met and made a
decision. We decided that terror was the main issue and that whatever
was necessary to stop it would be done… The military chief of staff,
the governors, the police – everyone worked together on it."

The deep state also played a major role in heroin smuggling from
Afghanistan through Turkey, a route which now accounts for around 90
percent of heroin smuggled into Europe. Like everything else, there
were no clear-cut lines of control between political parties,
ethnicities, or services. By 1998, for example, at least 15 MIT
officers had been killed in the vicious internal battle between the
intelligence service and the police over control of the drug trade.
"Only criminal networks working in close cooperation with the police
and the army could possibly organize trafficking on such a scale,"
concluded Le Monde Diplomatique. The celebrated former FBI translator
and whistleblower Sibel Edmonds writes that "the Turkish government,
MIT and the Turkish military, not only sanctions, but also actively
participates in and oversees the narcotics activities and networks."

One such network was discovered in 1998, when Turkish police were
accused of using their European embassies to aid smuggling. Huseyin
Baybasin, known as "Europe’s Pablo Escobar," masterminded the drug
flow to Britain. According to the Guardian, the Kurdish kingpin was
granted asylum there in 1995, in exchange for informing the British
Customs & Excise service about Turkish officials involved in heroin
trafficking. After his arrest in Holland soon thereafter, Baybasin
disclosed that he had received "the assistance of Turkish embassies
and consulates while moving huge shipments of drugs around Europe, and
that Turkish army officers serving with NATO in Belgium were also
involved. "The government kept all doors open for us," he said for the
Guardian. "We could do as we pleased." A senior UK Customs officer
stated that the drug barons evaded arrest, as they were "protected" at
a high level.

The one single incident that encapsulates what the Turkish deep state
is all about for many Turks occurred on November 3, 1996 near the town
of Susurluk, on the Izmir-Istanbul road. A car crash there killed what
would seem an unusual group of friends: the counterterrorism police
chief, a Turkish beauty queen, and her lover, the former Grey Wolves
leader and drug smuggler Abdullah Catli. Pistols with silencers and
machine guns, plus false diplomatic passports, were found in the
mangled car’s trunk. The only survivor, Kurdish parliamentarian Sedat
Bucak, was a tribal chief who administered a swathe of land in the
Kurdish southeast as a liegeman of the government. He guarded it with
his private army, and "thus acquired the power of life and death over
the area’s inhabitants," reported the French newspaper. For his part,
Catli "was a heroin trafficker on Interpol’s wanted list [and] was
carrying a diplomatic passport signed by none other than the Turkish
Interior Minister himself."

Catli’s team of hired assassins were alleged to have worked from a
"list" kept by Prime Minister Çiller. According to Le Monde
Diplomatique, she hailed him as a "great patriot" at his ignominious
funeral. Catli was known for racketeering people by warning them that
they were on "Çiller’s list"; if they paid up, he could get their
names removed. However, "having pocketed the money, he then went on to
have them kidnapped and killed, and sometimes tortured beforehand."

Signs of Continuity: Activities, Ideology and Personnel

The dramatic recent arrests of the Ergenekon gang show that the
descendents of NATO’s secret army in Turkey remain serious threats to
internal stability – the extent to which seems to have surprised many
Turks, judging from the tone of recent media reactions. Yet it also
seems that there is now a popular will to oppose them, stronger
perhaps than in years past. This week, across the Turkish media, the
cry has gone out to slay the beast once and for all. While the
American media seems content to not follow the story through to its
logical conclusion, the Turks know better. Respected Turkish columnist
Ali Bayramoglu sums it all up:

"…one looking for Ergenekon need not go too far. This is the story of
Ergenekon – the Turkish Gladio – from the assassination of
[journalist] Abdi I.pekçi [in 1979] to ‘the massacre of March 16’ [in
1978, when seven students at an Istanbul university were killed in a
bomb attack], then peaking in Susurluk and possibly involved in the
Council of State shooting [of a senior judge in 2006]."

Indeed, the similarities are striking, and not only in the use of
strategic and deceptive organized violence for political ends. The
very name of today’s troublemakers, Ergenekon, is rhetorically loaded:
as the Turkish Daily News reminds,

"…the name ‘Ergenekon’ implies an ideological link to the Turkish
far-right, as in Turkic genesis mythology, it is believed that a gray
wolf showed the Turks the way out of their legendary homeland, [the
valley of] ‘Ergenekon.’ Turkish ultranationalists have used the name
‘Grey Wolf’ for decades."

Recent reports have also attested to a continued reliance on heroin
smuggling for funding false-flag terrorism within Turkey. Turkish
newspaper Zaman reports:

"…Germany’s Niedersachsen State’s anti-drug department, the LKA, which
tapped the phones of some of the Ergenekon members as part of a
narcotics investigation, proved that Ergenekon members were indeed in
the drug business as well. The records of a Nov. 20, 2003 phone
conversation between retired Capt. Muzaffer Tekin, arrested in June of
last year as the owner of the munitions depot found in an Istanbul
shantytown that started the Ergenekon operation, and Yilmaz
Tavukçuoglu, an alleged drug trafficker, shows that Ergenekon used
drug money to fund its activities."

Together with the continuity of violent activities intended, as in
years past, to presage a military takeover, the Deep State’s rumblings
continue to be fuelled by drug profits and enlivened by the old
fascistic brand of nationalism. An example is the professor and
intellectual figurehead of the movement, Ümit Sayin, who in November
urged followers to stage a coup d’état, describing himself "as being
anti-Semitic, saying that Jewish people were fanatical, racist and in
favor of religious law. ‘Hitler was right about certain things,’ he
said."

In addition, the same cast of characters, some with direct connections
to events of years past such as the Susurluk scandal, have been
targets of the latest police action. The ringleader of the Ergenekon
group, according to the Turkish media, is Veli Küçük, "a retired
general who is also the alleged founder of a secret intelligence unit
in the gendarmerie," a man who had hovered on the periphery of
previous Deep State investigations; though Küçük’s surreptitious
squad, the JITEM, allegedly "carried out bombings and killings for
which other groups were widely blamed," he somehow always managed to
not be implicated (a Kurdish former informant quoted by Zaman charges
that the general is covering for figures even higher-up sympathetic to
the coup attempt).

Another former military man, retired army colonel Fikret Karadag,
"also heads the Association for the Union of Patriotic Forces (VKGB),"
one of several activist groups that have followed in the footsteps of
the 1960s-era quasi-political organizations that fed the original Grey
Wolves movement. Sami Hostan, another suspect, was "a key figure in
the Susurluk investigation." Also arrested was Sevgi Erenerol, a
former political ally of Alparslan Türkes, and spokeswoman for the
so-called "Turkish Orthodox Patriarchate," a church without a
congregation, simply a front and meeting place for nationalist
agitators.

The most recent reports claim that Gen. Küçük "had tried to ring
‘influential friends’ just before his arrest on Jan. 22." Aware that
police were closing in, the former general "made eight phone calls to
‘influential friends,’ telling them that the police were waiting at
the door to take him into custody, and asked for help – but his pleas
for help were rejected."

However, despite this eleventh-hour setback, other new information
reveals the intricate web of plotters, from low-level assassins to
high officials, involved in the plot. Zaman adds:

"…a plot to kill Turkey’s only Nobel Prize-winning author, Orhan
Pamuk, was also among Ergenekon’s plans. Newspapers printed
transcripts of recorded phone conversations between Spc. Sgt. Muhammed
Yüce, Ret. Col. Fikri Karadag and Selim Akkurt, the trigger-man hired
to do the job, whose phones were tapped with a court order. Officials
say that Yüce, who was also arrested for being part of the Ergenekon
organization, said in a phone conversation with the hit-man that he
had spoken to Karadag about the planned Pamuk assassination. Yüce told
Akkus, that an Istanbul businessman would financially support them as
would a prosecutor and a judge in Istanbul’s Kadiköy district.

Akkurt, who spoke in a worried tone, is quoted as saying he was
concerned he might end up like Mehmet Ali Agca, a deep-state assassin
who also shot the pope in the ’70s. Akkurt expressed a desire to be
like O.S., the teenager who shot Dink in January of last year, saying:
‘He has trillions of lira in his account. Plus, those around him have
become heroes.’ In response to these words, Yüce was quoted as having
said: ‘You, me and Fuci will take care of Orhan Pamuk. We will have
YTL [New Turkish Lira] 2 million in our accounts. Are you with me on
this one?’ Akkurt is heard giving an affirmative response to Yüce’s
question in the recordings.

Shortly after his conversation with Akkurt, Yüce sent a text message
to a relative in which he wrote: ‘We will take care of Orhan after the
conference. They will put in [YTL] 5 billion into our account. They
will give us a gas station and a villa. Sedat Peker will take care of
us while we’re in jail.’ Peker is an ultranationalist mafia leader
with apparent links to deep-state figures."

For Turkish sociologist Cem Özatalay, a wide consensus of powers had
grown concerned enough to instigate the recent action: "it is clear
that the USA, the General Staff and the AKP [Turkey’s ruling party]
have agreed to break the back of Ergenekon." Indeed, it is interesting
to note that the robust action against the ultranationalist group
unfolded not long after Turkish President Abdullah Gül returned from
meetings with US President Bush in the White House. And, despite the
significant participation of disgruntled elements in the army and
former military officials in the plot, it seems clear that the Turkish
military as an institution would prefer to keep the uneasy peace with
the allegedly ‘Islamist’ government of Prime Minister Erdogan, rather
than engage in old adventures that would diminish Turkey’s standing
abroad and quite possibly affect its ability to access Western
military technology at a time when Turkey is trying to create an
independent defense industry of its own. In denying army support for
the coup attempt, Chief of the Armed Forces General Staff General
Yasar Buyukanit recently stated that "at every opportunity, there have
been in the past and there continue to be efforts to link the armed
forces with these kinds of things."

Uncharted Territory

Aside from keeping foreign policy leverage and ensuring defense
industry cooperation, there might be a third reason why there was not
wide support in the Turkish establishment, either civilian and
military, for a coup, though at bottom it does have import for
watchers of Turkey’s deep state activities. This is the planned
participation of Turkey (along with other American allies in the
Middle East and North Africa) in an American-led program, GNEP, to
create nuclear power plants as a means for alleviating energy strain
and dependence on oil. On 22 January, as the Ergenekon arrests were
going down in Turkey, Washington announced that the country would get
the green light to go ahead with the program.

Aside from the rather alarming possible implications of juicing up,
say, Saudi Arabia, there are other items of interest here, the most
relevant being the question of why an agreement on nuclear technology
transfer to NATO-ally Turkey had not been achieved long ago. Indeed,
why not? As the AFP reported:

"…the deal stalled shortly after being signed in July 2000 because US
agencies received ‘information implicating Turkish private entities in
certain activities directly relating to nuclear proliferation,’ the
White House said… ‘the pertinent issues have been sufficiently
resolved.’"

Whether through a remarkable harmonic convergence of events or just
plain coincidence, the GTEP deal is peaking just at the moment Turkey
appears to be gaining the upper hand in the struggle against the deep
state – and, not to mention, at just the same moment that London’s
Sunday Times has come out with a serial investigation on what would
seem to be exactly this subject: the role of Turkish deep state
figures in the theft of American nuclear secrets, at precisely the
moment American security agencies were stumbling across "information
implicating Turkish private entities in certain activities directly
relating to nuclear proliferation."

Some have speculated that legalizing the nuclear trade with Turkey is
the Bush administration’s way of retroactively legalizing the
activities of any of the shadowy governmental figures that the Times
alleges were involved with the illicit commerce, so that they cannot
be touched in the event that their alleged misdoings are exposed. I do
not know enough about how such legislation works to be able to comment
on the likelihood of this or not, but even if so, it would seem a
rather small element of what is a global program with objectives
beyond securing the legacies of a few bad apple bureaucrats.

However, it certainly is remarkable that none of the Western media
bodies reporting on the GNEP developments, or on the recent arrests in
Turkey, have examined these events in the larger context of the
historic US/NATO role in creating the Turkish deep state, and of what
the Times alleges, not to mention attempting to put all the pieces
together.

Maybe the pieces fit; maybe they don’t. Yet unless the mainstream
media (the only media well-funded enough to undertake a proper
investigation) starts to take an interest, we will never know. After
all, no one in officialdom is talking about the Times’ allegations and
yet, somehow, "the pertinent issues have been sufficiently resolved,"
says the White House. In other words, Turkey’s proliferation
violations have been solved – even though they have never been
properly explained, or even admitted, by the powers that be.

http://www.antiwar.com/deliso/?articleid=12332

ProCredit Bank Armenia Opens For Business

PROCREDIT BANK ARMENIA OPENS FOR BUSINESS

The FINANCIAL
Feb 5 2008
Georgia

The FINANCIAL — As of today very small and small entrepreneurs
as well as "ordinary people" of Armenia do have a new bank and are
welcome at ProCredit Bank, ProCredit says in its announcement. The
opening ceremony of the bank took place today in Erevan.

The official ribbon cutting was done by Mr. Tigran Sargsyan, the
Chairman of the Central Bank Armenia, by Mr. Vardan Sukiasyan, the
first client of the bank, a small entrepreneur. The bank is located
at 31/99 Moskovyan.

"ProCredit Bank in Armenia, as well as in all countries of its
operation, will be customer-oriented, socially responsible bank,
providing high-quality and affordable services to ordinary people,
stressing the importance of lending to very small, small, and
medium-sized businesses and developing the savings culture among
ordinary people. "We will be your bank around the corner that offers
the best service to all its customers. We welcome everyone to start
saving with us or to get a loan for developing her/his business. The
whole ProCredit Team is looking forward to starting operations in
Armenia. We want to be your bank and make a difference," states
the Executive Director of ProCredit Bank, Mr. Bertolt Hertzfeldt",
bank says.

ProCredit Bank focuses on lending to very small, small and medium-sized
enterprises, as we are convinced that these businesses create the
largest number of jobs and make a vital contribution to the economical
development of Armenia. The bank will offer business loans starting
from 100 USD for small entrepreneurs and transparent banking services
to private individuals such as saving accounts without minimum
deposit amount.

The Central Bank of Armenia granted ProCredit Bank license to conduct
banking operations in Armenia on December 7, 2007. The shareholders
of ProCredit Bank are ProCredit Holding AG with the 66,66% of shares,
KfW with 16,67% of shares, and EBRD with 16,67% of shares. By the end
of 2008 ProCredit Bank Armenia will be present in three regions of
Armenia with six branches: four in Yerevan, one in Vanadzor, and one
in Artashat.

About ProCredit Bank:

ProCredit Bank in Armenia is part of the ProCredit Group. The Group
consists of 22 financial institutions in Eastern Europe, Africa,
and Latin America which are led and supervised by ProCredit Holding,
based in Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

BAKU: Azerbaijan’s Strong Economic and Military Potential Will Settl

Azerbaijan’s Strong Economic and Military Potential Will Settle Nagorno-Karabakh Problem in favor of Azerbaijan: President of Azerbaijan

Trend News Agency
Feb 5 2008
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, 5 February /corr. Trend S.Ilhamgizi / The strong
economy, its strong army and the military potential of Azerbaijan
will settle the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in favor of Azerbaijan,
said the President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, on 5 February during
the ceremony for the diploma ‘Man of the Year’ which was awarded to
him by the ANS Group of Companies and Fund named after National Hero
Chingiz Mustafayev.

The State Head of Azerbaijan said that Azerbaijan’s position includes
the absence of co-operation with Armenia until the release of the
occupied Azerbaijani territories, ANS reported. Ilham Aliyev added
that Azerbaijan will direct all its forces to liberate its territories.

"The activities directed towards strengthening the army, annually
increasing the military budget, creating military industry and
manufacturing its first product assumes great importance for future
plans," the President said.

Ilham Aliyev stated that Azerbaijan is currently holding peaceful
talks with Armenia because as yet there is still hope. "We should
be strong. Strong economy, strong army and strong military potential
will settle the issue in favor of Azerbaijan. We already can see the
initial signs," said the President of Azerbaijan.

ANKARA: =?unknown?q?Elekda=F0=3A?= ICJ Involvement Will Deal A Blow

ELEKDAÐ: ICJ INVOLVEMENT WILL DEAL A BLOW TO ARMENIAN THESIS

Today’s Zaman
Feb 5 2008
Turkey

It is time for Ankara to bring new perspective, organization and
dynamism to the Armenian issue, according to veteran Turkish diplomat
Þukru Elekdað.

Elekdað, a deputy for the main opposition Republican People’s Party
(CHP), insists that Ankara should take the first step in this new
direction by asking France to jointly take an almost decade-old French
parliamentary decision recognizing the controversial World War I-era
killings of Anatolian Armenians as genocide before the International
Court of Justice (ICJ) to determine whether the century-old incidents
can accurately be categorized as acts of genocide according to a
related UN convention.

Elekdað’s first remarks on the issue came last week in the French
capital following talks at the French parliament as part of a Turkish
parliamentary delegation.

The controversial decision bluntly stating that "France publicly
recognizes the Armenian genocide of 1915" was made in January 2001,
leading Ankara to lodge strong protests with Paris, including the
cancellation of a number of major projects with actual or potential
French involvement.

"We can go to the ICJ with France and ask whether the law adopted
in France in 2001 is in compliance with the agreement in 1948 and
whether the 1915 incidents constitute genocide," Elekdað was quoted
as saying by the Anatolia news agency, in an apparent reference to
the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime
of Genocide. He noted that the delegation had shared this view with
French lawmakers during their talks.

Armenians claim that up to 1.5 million of their kin were slaughtered
in orchestrated killings during the last years of the Ottoman Empire.

Turkey categorically rejects these claims, saying that 300,000
Armenians, along with at least as many Turks, died in civil strife
that emerged when the Armenians took up arms for independence in
eastern Anatolia and sided with the Russian troops who were invading
Ottoman territory.

Elekdað, a former Foreign Ministry undersecretary and also a former
ambassador to the US, speaking with Today’s Zaman on Monday, elaborated
on his remarks. First of all, he made clear that it was not possible to
try the Ottoman Empire under the 1948 UN Convention, since a convention
could not be implemented for incidents that took place prior to its
adoption and the controversial killings referred as the incidents of
1915 took place long before the adoption of the convention.

"What would the authorized court rule if we assume that the UN
Convention could be implemented retrospectively?" Elekdað asked. He
answered by referring to a ruling back in February 2007 in which the
ICJ exonerated Serbia of direct responsibility for the mass slaughter
of Bosnian Muslims at Srebrenica during the 1992-95 war in Bosnia,
but ruled that it failed to prevent a genocide. Key to the court’s
findings was its conclusion that no one in Serbia, or any official
organ of the state, could be shown to have had the deliberate intention
to "destroy in whole or in part" the Bosnian Muslim population —
a critical element in the 1948 Genocide Convention.

"According to this landmark ruling, a state cannot be held responsible
for genocide if it had used the means it had in hand to prevent the
genocide incident via showing the utmost effort and good will. … On
the other hand, the party that makes the genocide allegations must
prove with ‘absolute and undisputable’ evidence that the perpetrator
had not implemented necessary precautions with due diligence and that
it committed the crime with the specific intent [dolus specialis],"
Elekdað continued.

"In light of these facts, the French parliament’s decision in 2001
is a typical sample of execution without trial," he added.

What Turkey and France should ask the ICJ is whether the French
parliament has the authority to make a decision about the Ottoman
Empire according to the UN Convention and to ask whether the 1915
incidents constituted genocide according to the same convention,
he said.

"It is obvious that the court will rule that the French parliament
is not authorized to make such a decision, and it will also have to
announce that the UN Convention cannot be implemented retrospectively
due to the principle of legality. This means that the 1915 incidents
cannot be described as genocide. If the ICJ makes such a ruling, then
Armenia’s genocide allegation will entirely collapse," Elekdað said.

"If France avoids a joint application to the ICJ — which is a big
probability — then a heavy blow will be dealt to the political and
moral superiority of the Armenian thesis … in the international
arena. Such a development will also constitute a factor that will
prevent or at least make more difficult conviction of our citizens
on charges of denial of genocide and the making of parliamentary
decisions about the 1915 incidents."

–Boundary_(ID_h/9olUeHHp+jda4lK p1Q3g)–

Kocharyan Criticizes LTP for saying Azerbaijan should become key…

Robert Kocharyan criticizes Levon Ter-Petrossyan for his statement that
Azerbaijan should become key outlet for Armenia into outer world

2008-02-01 20:45:00

ArmInfo. President of Armenia Robert Kocharyan has criticized Levon
Ter-Petrossyan for his statement that Azerbaijan should become the key
outlet for Armenia into the outer world.

"I think that only a person with a very vague idea of geography can
make such statements. Just open the map and you will see that
geographically Azerbaijan cannot play such a role for us," Kocharyan
said today while visiting the construction of the new building of the
Defense Ministry of Armenia.

According to the president, most probably, the main thing for these
statements became the fact that during the USSR, 85% of the freights
really came from Azerbaijan. However, it is necessary to take into
consideration that these was internal freight traffic of the Soviet
Union and Armenia was not a subject of foreign trade. "This shows that
people don’t have information about the structure of foreign trade of
modern Armenia, in particular, about the fact that in trade relations
with Europe, the USA and other countries Azerbaijan is not in such
positions as to play an important role for our trade", R. Kocharian
said. The president drew attention on the fact that Armenia has
established trade contacts with Russia through the Georgian territory
and the Black Sea and this direction is fortified also by ferry
traffic. "I’d propose trying to look at such statements from another
angle. Karabakh peace process is currently being held and some
dizziness connected with the oil factor is observed in Azerbaijan. As
judged by oil expectations, Baku may try to stiffen its positions. If
the geographic knowledge in Azerbaijan remains at the same level, this
country will by all means try to stiffen its positions in the Karabakh
issue, stating that besides oil, it is also the main outlet to the
external world for Armenia", Kocharyan said. Levon Ter-Petrossyan’s
love for Azerbaijan and his attitude to this country is becoming
unhealthy and causes a lot of questions and doubts, he added.

Zangezour Plant Tops List Of 300 Biggest Tax Payers

ZANGEZOUR PLANT TOPS LIST OF 300 BIGGEST TAX PAYERS

ARMENPRESS
Jan 28, 2008

YEREVAN, JANUARY 28, ARMENPRESS: The list of 300 biggest taxpayers
last year was topped by Zangezour copper and molybdenum plant in the
southern province of Syunik.

According to the list, unveiled by state taxation service, the
Zangezour plant paid 33.6 billion drams in taxes and dues last
year. Almost 32 billion were paid as taxes.

The second biggest taxpayer was ArmenTel telephone company which
paid almost 21 billion drams, of which over 17 million drams were
paid as taxes.

The third line was occupied by the Russian-Armenian ARG natural gas
operator which paid about 16 billion drams.

The ARG was followed by the second mobile telephone operator VivaCell,
Citypetrol Service and Flash fuel importers and Salex Group, a major
importer of food commodities.

ANTELIAS: Antelias Requiem for late catholicoi and brother members

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

Armenian version: nian.htm

ANTELIAS HOLDS A REQUIEM SERVICE IN MEMORY OF
FORMER CATHOLICOI

A requiem service was held in the Catholicosate of Cilicia in Antelias on
January 27 to honor the memory of former Catholicoi of the Holy See of
Cilicia. Following the Sunday Mass in the Mother Church, a Procession of the
Cilician Brotherhood members and Seminary students headed by His Holiness
Aram I guided the faithful to the "Zarehian Mausoleum" in the vicinity of
the Cathedral.

The requiem service ended with the "Cilicia" and "I Veh Partsants" hymns,
performed jointly by the choir and the faithful.

It has become an annual tradition to hold requiem service for the souls of
the former Catholicoi of Cilicia on the Sunday following the Holiday of
Saint Sahag Bartev.

##
View the photos here:
tos/Photos189.htm
*****
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the history and
the mission of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of
the Catholicosate, The Cilician
Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is located in
Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/v04/doc/Arme
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/v04/doc/Pho
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org

ANTELIAS: HH Aram I receives Mgr Boulos Matar of Maronite Pat & MECC

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

Armenian version: nian.htm

HIS HOLINESS ARAM I RECEIVES ARCHBISHOP MATAR
AND THE GENERAL SECRETARY OF MECC

His Holiness Aram I received the Primate of the Maronite Church in Beirut
and Vicar to the Maronite Patriarch Archbishop Boulos Matar in Antelias on
January 26. Gerges Saleh, the General Secretary of the Middle East Council
of Churches, accompanied the Bishop.

The talks focused on ecumenical affairs and issues related to the Middle
East Council of Churches (MECC). As the newly elected Presidents of MECC,
they discussed a number of issues emerging from the last assembly of the
MECC. They also went through the programs of the Council for the coming
period.

The first meeting of the new Executive Committee will take place in
Antelias, from 4-7 March 2008.

##
View the photo here:
tos/Photos188.htm#2
*****
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the Ecumenical
activities of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of
the Catholicosate, The Cilician
Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is located in
Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/v04/doc/Arme
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/v04/doc/Pho
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org

Pragmatism vs populism

What the Papers Say Part A (Russia)
January 25, 2008 Friday

PRAGMATISM VS POPULISM

Andranik Migranjan

HIGHLIGHT: PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN ARMENIA: POPULATION WILL MOSTLY
VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE OF THE REGIME; An update on the forthcoming
election of the president of Armenia.

Six candidates for president of Armenia out of nine are prominent
figures playing an instrumental part in republican politics. Election
is scheduled for February 19.

Nominated by the Republican Party, Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisjan has
the Affluent Armenia party’s support as well. These political parties
polled nearly 50% in the parliamentary election and control almost
two thirds of the parliament. It follows that their nominee has vast
resources to tap.

Also importantly, the Armenian opposition failed to combine efforts
and nominate a single candidate for president. The implication is
clear: opposition candidates (six of them) will be merely getting in
each other’s way.

Last but not the least, the population wants stability as opposed to
any radical changes and "color" (orange or otherwise) scenarios.

Opinion polls in the meantime indicate that more than every second
Armenian is prepared to cast his or her vote for Sarkisjan. Other
prominent candidates (Levon Ter-Petrosjan, Arthur Bagdasarjan, Vagan
Oganesjan, Vazgen Manukjan, Artashes Gegamjan) will poll between 5%
and 10% each.

Source: Rossiiskaya Gazeta, January 25, 2008, p. 6

Translated by A. Ignatkin