LGB Elections

LGB ELECTIONS

A1+
| 12:56:35 | 19-09-2005 | Politics |

Yesterday elections were held in 4 communities in Yerevan. In three
of them the residents were electing heads of community, and in the
forth they were electing aldermen. Up to now the final results are
not known, but the preliminary results are.

It is already clear that the electors were not interested in
the election process and were not active. For example, in the
Qanaqer-Zeytun community only 22 796 of the 53 491 registered electors
participated in the elections, in Noubarashen- only 3900 of 7211
elections, and in Erebouni – only half of the 87 927 electors. In
the Norq-Marash region where aldermen were to be elected, 4176 of
the 8292 citizens participated in the election.

There have also been problems with the electoral rolls. In the
Erebouni, Noubarashen and Qanaqer-Zeytun communities 18, 374 and
540 electors respectively have applied to the court to restore their
electoral right.

By preliminary results in the Norq-Marash community all the candidates
for aldermen are elected. In Noubarashen Mher Hovhannisyan has received
the majority of votes, and in Erebouni Mher Sedrakyan has been elected.

As for Qanaqer-Zeytun, two of the candidates have received almost
equal quantity of votes, and only after a second counting will they
be able to say who has been elected.

ArmeniaNow 1/2 – 09/16/2005

ARMENIANOW.COM
Administration Address: 26 Parpetsi St., No 9
Phone: +(374 1) 532422
Email: [email protected]
Internet:
Technical Assistance: (For technical assistance please contact Babken
Juharyan)
Email: [email protected]
BETTER THAN NEIGHBORS, WITH ROOM TO IMPROVE: UN REPORT RANKS ARMENIA WITH THE
WORLD
By Marianna Grigoryan
ArmeniaNow reporter
Since 1990 the United Nations has published its annual Human Development
Report, ranking countries according to living conditions.
Using analysis based on a country’s statistical bureau (2003 for this report),
World Bank, and other reliable sources, UNO assigns grades according to
certain conditions based on three main components: education, life expectancy
and gross domestic product (GDP).

In the report () released September 7, Armenia is rated 83
out of 177 countries. Caucasus neighbors Georgia and Azerbaijan ranked 100 and
101 respectively. One grade above Armenia is Ecuador, with the Philippines one
grade worse. The highest rated country is Norway at No. 1, while Niger is at
the bottom. The United States comes in at 10, United Kingdom at 15, and France
at 16.
(In the previous report, Armenia in fact ranked higher, at 82. However, the
drop of one position does not reflect a decline, but rather the fact that
other countries improved, too, and more countries were added to the list.)

According to economic expert of the UN Human Development program Aghasi
Lazarian, Armenia’s overall human development index has risen from .754
to .759 over the past year `owing to economic growth as a result of which the
GDP index has grown from 0.57 to 0.60′. (Over the same period, the education
index has not changed; nor has health, although the life expectancy in Armenia
has dropped from 72.3 to 71.5)
According to statistical data main sectors contributing to the growth in 2003
in Armenia were construction at 44%, and industry, 15%.

Despite the constant complaints from people that the social conditions of
people in Armenia does not improve through years, statistical data say other
things.

According to statistics from the UN, the index of poverty in Armenia has also
dropped.

If in 2002 nearly 49.7 % of the Armenian population were poor, of which
the `very poor’ were 13.1 %, in 2003 the index of poverty dropped to 42.7 %,
and the level of extreme poverty has been cut in half, reaching 7.4 %.

Fifth among (12) the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries,
Armenia is behind Russia (62nd), Belarus (67th), the Ukraine (78th) and
Kazakhstan (80th position), but (in addition to Georgia and Azerbaijan) ahead
of former USSR countries of Turkmenistan (97th), Kyrgyzstan (109th),
Uzbekistan (111th), Moldova (115th) and Tajikistan (122nd).

According to Marc Malloch Brown, administrator of the United Nations
Development Program, the Human Development Reports have proved valuable over
the years.

`The reports have had an undeniable role of catalysts in developing and
forming certain responses in the major development policy of our times,’ he
mentions in a brief note of the report.

Minister of Foreign Affairs Vartan Oskanian says although Armenia is not bad
compared to its neighbors, the picture is different in terms of the world.

`Armenia should be able to understand its problems and should take the 2005
Human Development Report as a guide for its future activities,’ he said.

GAZA STRIP MODEL FOR NKR?: STUDY GROUP SAYS KARABAKH SHOULD EVACUATE `OCCUPIED
TERRITORIES’
By Aris Ghazinyan
ArmeniaNow reporter
The International Crisis Group on Conflict Prevention released a report on the
Nagorno Karabakh question, with conclusions that aren’t likely to endear the
group to officials in Yerevan, where they arrived on Monday.
On September 10, the mission was in Baku, Azerbaijan where it handed over its
report to Azeri Foreign Minister Elmar Mamedyarov. Two days later in the
Armenian capital, mission head Alain Deletroz said: `The Armenian side should
immediately withdraw from the territories of Azerbaijan it controls and
suspend ongoing projects in these regions.’

Deletroz’ comments reflect the content of the report (found in full at
) that calls for a pullout of Karabakh from `occupied’
territories of Azerbaijan.

At a press conference in Baku, Deletroz said that seven regions near Karabakh,
where Armenians (some from Karabakh and some from Armenia) have relocated and
established settlements since the 1994 cease-fire `should be freed, refugees
be returned and only then will it become possible to negotiate the status of
Nagorno Karabakh that can be determined within 10-15 years.’ At the same time,
he noted that Baku must cease its propaganda against Armenia and stop
building `the image of the enemy’ in public consciousness.

The International Crisis Group was formed in 1995 and is engaged in studying
of conflicts in 44 regions of the world. The group includes retired diplomats
as well as ex-foreign ministers and former heads of separate departments of
different countries. The goal of the ICG is to study situations in the zones
of ethnic conflicts and to develop recommendations to the parties to these
conflicts. The group spent nine months, including on-the-ground observations,
studying the Karabakh situation.

ICG has its South Caucasus region office in Tbilisi, Georgia.

`The cruel war over Nagorno Karabakh has brought to ruin about 18,000 human
lives and the displacement of more than a million people before a fragile
truce was established in 1994,’ Sabina Fraser, director of the Tbilisi office
said in Yerevan. `For the past 11 years life in Nagorno Karabakh has more or
less returned to normal: the economy is developing and elective institutions
are functioning. However, nothing has been done to reinstate those who
suffered from the war in their rights. It is necessary to return refugees to
the places of their former residence.’

She also noted that the group `had prepared a recommendation addressed to the
leadership of Nagorno Karabakh with a proposal to stop the process of settling
Armenians in the occupied Azeri territories.’
`This process, though it is not intensive, still should be suspended and all
conditions should be created for the return of Azeri refugees,’ Sabina Fraser
said.

Yerevan political analyst Alexander Manasyan says the ICG report reflects `a
scandalous discrepancy between the character of the conflict and the
definitions given to it by the ICG.

`In particular, the term `war over Nagorno Karabakh’ fully reflects the
official position of Azerbaijan, according to which Nagorno Karabakh is an
object of the Armenian-Azeri confrontation. Meanwhile, it is obvious that it
is the subject of the conflict, for the people of the NKR has made their
choice in full conformity with current legal points. The group does not take
into account the fact that war was started by Azerbaijan, and the armistice
was established by the Armenian sides.’

During his Yerevan press conference Deletroz did not deny lacking information
about the history of the conflict but resisted going into detail about his
understanding of its background.

`Each side has its own `historical version’ and our group investigates
exclusively the current stage of the development of the problem,’ he said.

ICG has its South Caucasus region office in Tbilisi, Georgia.

`The cruel war over Nagorno Karabakh has brought to ruin about 18,000 human
lives and the displacement of more than a million people before a fragile
truce was established in 1994,’ Sabrina Fraser, director of the Tbilisi office
said in Yerevan. `For the past 11 years life in Nagorno Karabakh has more or
less returned to normal: the economy is developing and elective institutions
are functioning. However, nothing has been done to reinstate those who
suffered from the war in their rights. It is necessary to return refugees to
the places of their former residence.’

The Group’s reports will have political consequences, many Armenian newspapers
write, pointing out that `similar non-governmental organizations do not do
anything without reason.

`The claims that this public initiative hardly deserves a serious attitude in
view of its own incompetence to assert any political decisions are erroneous,
as it first of all is focused on the formation of international public opinion
on this issue,’ writes `Golos Armenii’ newspaper. `In this case we deal with a
report that will by all means become a subject for discussions within
international structures and cannot but impact the sentiments of the world
community.’

`Azg’ daily remembers in this connection the statement of American Cabinet
Member Strobe Talbott, who said: `As U.S. Undersecretary of State I used the
publications of the ICG. The reports prepared by this group and its analytical
researches as a rule comprised information that could not be received from
other sources. Therefore, it is no wonder that its recommendations frequently
were reflected in our ultimate political decision-making.’

`The group works in 44 disputed zones of the world, and in separate cases we
ourselves recommend to the parties of the conflict to initiate military
operations, as we don’t simply see any other solution,’ Deletroz
said. `However, it does not concern the Armenian-Azeri confrontation in which
the diplomatic resource has not been exhausted yet. Therefore, we completely
support `the Prague Process’ of negotiations between the personal
representatives of the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan.’

In the ICG’s opinion, following its recommended withdraw of Armenians from
Azeri territory `control over them may be yielded to international peace-
keeping forces.’

Deletroz did not mention what the Armenian parties can expect in that case,
only adding the thought that he had expressed earlier about the possibility of
determining the status of Nagorno Karabakh within 10-15 years.

`It is a rather delicate question, but I must say that in the opinion of the
group the referendum of 1991 in Nagorno Karabakh can barely have valid force,
for it was conducted in a completely different political situation. Meanwhile,
we should adapt the present confrontation to the modern political conditions,’
Deletroz said.

COUNCIL TO PROTECT: HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS COLLABORATE IN DEFENSE OF IMPRISONED
SOLDIERS
By Zhanna Alexanyan
ArmeniaNow reporter
A collection of human rights protection agencies, including representatives of
the Helsinki Committee of Armenia, have formed a council for the defense of
Razmik Sargsyan, Araik Zalyan and Musa Serobyan, soldiers sentenced to 15
years each for the murder of two other soldiers last year in Karabakh.

(The soldiers were convicted of killing Hovsep Mktrumyan and Roman
Yeghiazaryan, whose bodies were found in early January, 2004 in a reservoir
near where the soldiers were stationed. Zalyan and Serobyan have maintained
their innocence. Sargsyan confessed to having a role in the murders, but later
said he was tortured into making the confession, which also implicated the
other two. Sargsyan has been on a hunger strike since August 12, in protest of
all their convictions. See links below for related stories).

The human rights’ groups claim that the young soldiers are recent examples in
a long line of conscripts who suffer mistreatment, violence and, in this case,
outright lawlessness that is widespread in the Armenian army.

A statement by the council charges the Military Prosecutor’s Office with
wrongly influencing the investigation, conviction and all related legal issues
concerning the soldiers. It has done so, the group alleges, in an effort to
protect company commander Ivan Grigoryan, who defenders of the convicted say
is responsible for the murders.

The council also claims that the court has done nothing to suppress threats
made against the defendants’ families and attorneys by supporters of the
prosecution.

`The fact that the court takes no measures against such activities proves the
court dependence on the Military Prosecutor’s Office,’ the council’s statement
says.

The council (as well as lawyers for the defendants) also criticized the court
for not calling Grigoryan to testify. Seyran Ohanyan, Defense Minister of
Nagorno-Karabagh Republic sent a petition not to cause an action against
Grigoryan, saying that the Karabakh war veteran is “a national hero and has
regrets”.

`What Ivan Grigoryan regrets has remained unanswered both during the
preliminary and court investigations,’ the council statement says.

Supporters of Zalyan, Sargsyan and Serobyan have organized many press
conferences and public appearances, including protest demonstrations in front
of the Presidential Residence and the Prosecutor General’s Office.

`We will declare war against the actions of the Military Prosecutor’s Office,’
says human rights activist Artur Sakunts. `The only way is the formation of
the council and the public actions that will be targeted not only at
protecting the young people, but will also engage all those citizens who have
suffered from the Military Prosecutor’s Office.’

Meanwhile, an appeal’s court has suspended hearing Sargsyan’s case due to his
bad health brought on by the hunger strike.

Lawyers defending Sargsyan – Zaruhi Postanjyan, Stepan Voskanyan and Ashot
Atoyan – have not seen their client since August 25. Prison officials will not
allow them to meet in Sargsyan’s cell, and prison officals say he is too weak
to walk to the attorney-client meeting room.

`Our right as defenders has been violated. We are deprived of an opportunity
to meet our defendant for 22 days. If his condition is that bad why they do
not move him to hospital?’ complains Postanjyan, who believes his client
isolation is meant to apply psychological pressure.

The prison head says Sargsyan’s health is not so bad and that he will be moved
to hospital should his health be endangered.

On Monday, attorneys received a note from prison authorities saying in
part: `medical documents regarding health of imprisoned people are not given;
the medical cards are secret documents.’

Lawyers for Sargsyan say the 19-year-old is suffering kidney failure, cannot
walk, and can barely speak.

BLOOD RELATIVE: NEW (ARMENIAN) INVENTION EXPECTED TO MAKE DIABETES EASIER TO
CONTROL
By Suren Musayelyan
ArmeniaNow reporter
A revolutionary glucose level measuring and monitoring device for diabetics
will become available next year, and its Armenian inventor hopes it will find
broad application in Armenia, where diabetes is a wide-spread health risk.

The Glucoband is the latest development of U.S.-based Calisto Medical, Inc.
().

The company’s CEO and founder Vahram Mouradian, who is the main inventor of
the Glucoband (and who owned Yerevan’s Leda Systems until selling it off to
Synopsis last year), says the device is the first non-invasive blood glucose
monitor. If proven effective, the Glucoband would enable users to measure
certain substances in the bloodstream, without breaking the skin.

`The device is aimed at enabling patients, healthcare professionals, and
generally anyone to monitor glucose level changes and the measure of the
glucose level in the body or blood,’ says Mouradian.

The Glucoband is a wristwatch-like portable electronic device, with a touch
screen, a built-in computer, embedded microprocessor, flash memory, and watch.
According to Mouradian, if there is a demand, the company is also ready to
provide designer Glucobands (with diamonds, etc.).

`It is an exciting thing that gives you (options such as a regular watch) and
glucose level as well,’ says Mouradian, adding that designers also took into
account making the Glucoband as discrete as possible.

`No one will ever suspect that you are a diabetic because of wearing it,’ says
Mouradian.

The inventor hopes that the product, which still needs to be certified by
Armenia’s Health Ministry and obtain a license for sale, will become available
in Armenia next year, when it enters the international market (pending certain
clinical tests).

The new device is also intended to be cost effective. Mouradian does not yet
want to speculate on the price of the product, but says that it should be a
few hundred dollars. (According to Mouradian, on an annual basis an average
diabetic in America spends up to $2,500 on means of monitoring glucose.)

`It will be saving probably 75 percent on an annual basis,’ Mouradian
estimates.

To measure their glucose (`blood sugar’) level today, people have to prick
their finger, extract blood, put the blood on a test strip and then put the
strip into a monitor performing certain chemical analyses. The currently used
monitor costs $100 and given that such tests might be performed by a patient
four to 18 times a day (with the use of various disposable accessories, such
as strips costing up to a dollar each) it adds up to quite an expensive
procedure.

In contrast, the Glucoband needs no drop of blood (and is painless) as it
accesses the body with just two electrodes producing data within a few
minutes.

Mouradian says that the Glucoband is also unique because it is designed for
continuous monitoring, which detects trends in the change of glucose, which
could be useful data for a diabetic’s physician.

Mouradian says that the Glucoband can be used by anyone, without exception.

Diabetes, third behind cancer and cardio-vascular diseases as world-wide cause
of death, has been steadily increasing in Armenia over the past decade,
according to the World Health Organization. According to official statistics,
there are about 16,000 diabetes patients in Armenia, but the actual number is
believed to be multiple times higher.

Mouradian says the company’s interests in Armenia are mostly personal, as the
potential here would hardly represent a commercial windfall. But four of the
five-member team (including himself) working on the Glucoband are ethnic
Armenians, with special interests in seeing the Armenian-produced device
succeed. (Mouradian himself divides his time between his home in Texas, and
Armenia.)

`As a sales market, Armenia is just a small fraction of what can be sold, for
example in China. The whole of Armenia is like one part of Shanghai. But there
is a certain potential for Armenia to have sufficient resources to be used as
part of research and development, enhancement of the product line and
support,’ says Mouradian, adding that there is also a remote possibility of
doing assembly and testing in Armenia.

`This product is not going to become Armenian per se, but certainly Armenia is
considered number one outside of the U.S. for research development and, why
not, marketing in the region,’ Mouradian says. He adds that, ideally, every
family should have the Glucoband, like they have thermometers or blood
pressure monitors.

In June, Mouradian’s company introduced the Glucoband at a health exposition
in San Diego, California. He says they already have a wide response to their
planned offer and receive a couple of hundred emails every day, which,
according to him, only confirms the need of a convenient and effective glucose
level meter.

Mouradian is a 1984 graduate of the Polytechnic Institute in Yerevan from
which he received his Ph. D. in electronic engineering and computer science.

Although he has no formal medical education, he worked extensively with
medical groups, including in Armenia, and still has contacts with healthcare
professionals. He has been `self-educating’ in endocrinology towards diabetes
for two and a half years.

Mouradian set up Calisto Medical in 2003 and the company became operational in
early 2004.

`This is one good example when different fields of activities are combined,’
says Mouradian.

`The whole idea here was putting together the medical advances and the
knowledge and experience of advanced engineering and electronics.’

PLANTING SEEDS AND PEDALING FOR PROGRESS: ATG SEES GREAT YIELDS FOR ARMENIAN
FARMERS
By Gayane Lazarian
ArmeniaNow reporter

Andranik Hovakimyan, 42, from the village of Aygepar in Armenia’s Tavush
region talks about his wheat fields and of the burden they have tolerated
along with the rest of the country.
{ai107901.jpg|left}`After the collapse of the Soviet Union and after the
Karabakh war our region became isolated from advances in agriculture observed
in other parts of the country. After land privatization we were left alone
facing the problems of land.’

But now, too, Hovakimyan looks at his high-yielding crops and has a better
report:

`All this was left behind when we met the Armenian Technology Group (ATG)
NGO.’

Hovakimyan says that they didn’t have seeds, fertilizers or other items needed
for land cultivation. Local seeds had lost their quality. Random merchants
would bring and sell whaterver seeds they could find, and as a result, the
crops were no better than the means of producing them.

`Before the emergence of ATG () we didn’t know who to trust, but
now we get amazing results,’ he says.

ATG was established in 1989 through the efforts of American-Armenian
veterinary Andranik Hazarapetian. During those years with several specialists
(agronomists, veterinarians) they visited Armenia.

`Earthquake, blockade, war, unemployment, ruined rural economy. After seeing
all this we decided to contribute to Armenia’s economic development by
creating necessary conditions to address all that, emphasizing the
agricultural sector,’ says ATG Executive Director Varuzhan Ter-Simonian. `We
began to import wheat seeds, at that time 80 percent of Armenia’s wheat seeds
had already been coming from abroad,’

With U.S. Government assistance the organization began to import seeds. Before
the distribution of seeds they organized lectures to keep farmers aware of how
to treat it before planting.

`We organized lectures also after planting, and generally three times a year.
We selected farmers according to their abilities and according to demand. Five
of our specialists came from the United States and went to different regions
of Armenia – Syunik, Gegharkunik, Tavush, Armavir and Shirak. The goal was to
live with a farmer side by side and help him. During those years more than
100,000 farmers were retrained,’ says Ter-Simonian.

Beginning in 1995 ATG decided to organize seed production locally. They began
to cooperate with international organizations, such as the International Maze
and Wheat Improvement Organization (CIMMYT).

Ter-Simonian says that they have tested more than 250 varieties of wheat in
Armenia. Due to ATG’s activities, the country’s wheat seed production
increased by 30 percent. Armenia’s Selection Achievement Experimental
Protection and Seed Quality Control Center licensed seven varieties of ATG
wheat in Armenia.

In 1998, ATG Foundation established the Seed Producers’ Support Association
(SPSA) NGO for the local farmers to continue this work with their own efforts.

About 100 farms representing the republic’s nine regions are members of the
union today. These farms are mainly engaged in producing wheat, fodder crop
and potato seedings.

Hovhakimyan says farmers got unlimited assistance from ATG. `ATG’s
professional advice, new high-quality wheat seeds and new technologies have
made us competitive on the local market today,’ he says.

In addition to its seed-producing initiative, ATG also organizes bike-a-thons
(marathon races on bicycles) and all proceeds received from them are used for
implementing their agricultural projects.

Ter-Simonian says that for Diaspora Armenians, Armenia should not be limited
to Yerevan only. And a bike-a-thon brings people to Yerevan, and then takes
them to the country’s different regions. `We contribute to the development of
our adventure tourism, investing the revenues from this into the rural
economy,’ he says.

With the funds of the first bike-a-thon held in 1999 a grape nursery was
established in Karabakh. The nursery established in a territory of 1.5
hectares in the borderline village of Khramort today already reaches 8
hectares. Here local grape varieties are vaccinated against phylloxera, a
disease eats the grapes’ roots.

{ai107902.jpg|right}Four milk cooling tanks were bought from proceeds of the
second bike-a-thon held on August 21-27, 2004 and placed in four regions.

The proceeds from this year’s bike-a-thon, held on August 21-27, 2005 will be
invested into the establishment of a diagnostic laboratory for use in cattle
breeding.

`Armenia has no such laboratory. The one preserved from the past diagnoses two
diseases, and the new one will make it possible to diagnose six at a time,’
says Ter-Simonian. `If animals are healthy, then a farmer’s business does not
suffer, people’s health is not endangered, and finally Armenia can freely
export its agricultural produce to the international market.’

The republic’s veterinaries today take a special examination at the Ministry
of Agriculture to work in the future diagnostic laboratory center.
Construction will begin by the end of this year. One million dollars of the
required five will be invested by the Armenian Government, the rest will be
provided by the U.S. Government, ATG Foundation.

According to the executive director, 14 people have already applied for
participation in next year’s bike-a-thon.

`The help of participants in the Bike-a-Thon effort is invaluable to our
projects. It is also a wonderful occasion to visit Armenia’s rural areas and
contribute a little to the economic development of villages,’ says Ter-
Simonian.

SWEET VAN: GENOCIDE SURVIVOR HAS MOTHER’S MEMORIES TO SUSTAIN A LONG LIFE
By Mariam Badalyan
ArmeniaNow reporter
Aharon Manukyan’s eyes widen when memories of his childhood take him back to
his home in Van, then to an orphanage in Alexandrapol and the big, round
chocolates of a Mr. Yaro, a patron of that orphanage.

Yerevantsi, but, always, Vanetsi

The orphanage became the boy’s home when he became exiled like so many
thousands who were chased from their homes during the 1915 Genocide. Not so
many survivors remain these 90 years later. Aharon was only 1 year old when
his family was run out of their home. His account of deportation relies on
stories told by his mother.

His 91 year old face shows all its age, when he retells his mother’s
account . . .

The Vanetsis put up a fight against Turkish invaders, aided by Russian forces.
But when the Russians pulled out, the 200,000-strong Armenian population left
for Eastern Armenia. Aharon’s father died during the battle to save Van.

`My mother passed the deportation path with me on her arms and (brothers)
Meliqset and Vahram pulling on her skirt,’ Aharon says. `When we were crossing
the river Euphrates it was very red, and the water carried corpses.’

Aharon’s mother, Mariam, hid their family valuables in her father’s grave in
Van, then set out on foot with the three children for Echmiadsin (about ???
kilometers). There, she had to beg for food to keep the children alive. Soon,
she took the children to the orphanage in Alexandrapol (now Gyumri), then
returned to Echmiadzin to look for a job.

`The orphanage belonged to an American couple. The husband’s name was Mr. Yaro
and the wife’s name Miss Limin,’ Aharon says, pronouncing names of orphanage
trustees like a five-year old child, distorting the pronunciation. `They were
very kind people. They lost their only child and devoted all their love to the
orphanage children.’

He lists the orphanage food as if so many decades had not passed since he ate
them: milk, soup, gata, halva, dried fruit. The orphanage seemed a paradise
for a child who passed through starvation.

`It was only once that I did not go to school. I had a sore throat and I did
not feel like going to school. There was an American whose name was Miche.
When children did not want to go to school the mother-superior, Sandukht, the
orphanage headmistress, called Miche. Miche came, took out my trousers and,
thrashing, drove me barefooted through snow to the school entrance,’ Aharon
smiles. `This was the last time I was absent from school.’

The American couple adopted Aharon and his brothers and intended to take them
to the United States. Aharon’s mother learned about it and rushed to the
orphanage. She had found a job in Yerevan and could take the children with
her.

`My mother was in charge of technical services at a laundry in Yerevan. In a
short while, Mrs. Limin came. She offered 40 pieces of gold for my mother to
let me go with her to America. She told my mother that I reminded her of her
dead son. But my mother refused,’ Aharon laughs naughtily. `I would be a
wealthy man now. They say Mr. Yaro had 200 offices in America.’

Aharon has bright memories of his mother. During her whole life Mariam told
endlessly about the town of Van – the Armenian districts of Aygestan and
Qaghaqamech, churches, the town fortress, Armenian habits and culture.

`My mother told us,’ Aharon remembers, `that during windy days water in the
lake rose and fish, which were thrown ashore, moved to the town through
rivulets. People caught them very easily. Tarekh (herring) was a very tasty
fish. And in the nearby village of Artamet, a type of very sweet apple called
bagyurmas, grew. One of such apples weighed more than a kilo.’

`My father never misses a chance to speak of Van,’ says Aharon’s daughter
Ruzan, 47. `For example whenever we eat fish he says: `you should have eaten
tarekh (herring) from Lake Van’. We all know he also has never had it, but we
understand that it is very important for him to speak of Van. It is kind of
paying tribute to his homeland and to my grandmother.’

Aharon looks at nowhere and smiles. He is not in the room, but moved to his
past now and like a film come episodes from his life and his mother’s
image . . .

`There was a hot spring coming from underneath St.Virgin Church,’ Aharon
repeats what his mother had told him. `Every kind of sick person came and took
a bath in the water and was healed. People threw gold pieces into the water as
a payment for their wonder healing.

`My mother, although uneducated, was a very kind and wise woman. All my life I
have been reading and learning things, however the values I have had in my
life come from my mother – good manners, honesty, kindness. These I passed to
my four children.’

In 1945, inspired from his mother’s stories and the family’s fate, Aharon
graduated from Yerevan State University in the faculty of history. And he
never forgot that he is Vanetsi.

He says he is partly satisfied, knowing that this year some European states
formally acknowledged as fact the Armenian Genocide. He dreams of seeing the
day when Turkey will be called to account for those atrocities.

His glance is again far away in the past, and he sometimes smiles indulged in
sweet memories. And sometimes frowns from a history that has given him the
label of `survivor’.

TO YEREVAN WITH LOVE: RUSSIAN TSAR TO BE HONORED WITH DAVID OF SASUN-SIZED
MONUMENT
By Suren Deheryan
ArmeniaNow reporter
By the time Russian Tsar Peter I built a city on the river Neva in 1703 and
turned it into Russia’s new capital naming it Petersburg, he had already been
in close relations with Armenians, giving them privileges in Russia.

Three hundred years later, Yerevan is repaying his kindness.

September 13-14 were designated as days of commemoration for St. Petersburg,
with a number of events, and an official delegation led by Governor of
Leningrad region Valentina Matvienko.

The days of St. Petersburg were part of the program of the `Year of Russia’ in
Armenia. An exhibition was opened here, concerts were staged, official visits
were paid and Russian-Armenian business meetings were held, which reaffirmed
the three-century-old friendly ties between the Russian emperor and Armenians.

Among actions, Governor Matvienko and Yerevan Mayor Yervand Zakharyan agreed
that a St. Petersburg center be opened in Yerevan and an Armenian center in
St. Petersburg.

Most noted, however, was the confirmation of a proposal to erect a 5.5-meter
(18-feet) statue of the Great Peter in front of the local government building
of the Arabkir community of Yerevan.

Atop a two-to-three meter pedestal, the bronze Peter I will gaze with arms
crossed toward Mt. Ararat. Top to bottom, the statue of the Russian tzar will
equal that of Armenia’s most famous hero, David of Sasun, which stands in
front of the railway station.

`The monument will be about as high as a four-storied building,’ the co-author
of the project, architect Ashot Alexanyan says with excitement. `Peter, who
building Petersburg created a `Window to Europe’ for Russia, will be presented
here on the subject of the `Gate to the South”.

Besides Alexanyan, involved in the implementation of the project are also
sculptor from Russia Vadim Tserkovnikov (designer of the statue) and Yerevan’s
chief architect Samvel Danielyan. According to the agreement, the bronze
statue will be prepared and will be transferred from Russia and the Armenian
side will provide the monument near the statue and see to the works on the
improvement of the park area.

Alexanyan says it will take at least six months to complete the project.

Meanwhile, information about the `coming of Emperor Peter to Yerevan’ recently
appeared on the Internet. In particular, it aroused stormy discussions at one
of the forums on the Hayastan portal (
showtopic=17924&st=0) under the question:

`They want to set up a statue to Peter I in Yerevan. What the hell for?’

It seems a reasonable question, considering that Yerevan doesn’t even host a
comparable statue of Armenia’s own Great, Tigran II.

Alexander Prokhorenko, who chairs St. Petersburg’s external relations
commission and arrived in Yerevan on St. Petersburg’s official delegation,
attempted an answer:

`A statue is a symbol and nothing more,’ Prokhorenko told ArmeniaNow. `But
there is certain logic here, since it was under Peter that for the first time
an Armenian community was created and it actively participated in the
construction of Petersburg. Thus, we can say that Peter I was one of the
Russian tsars who `transplanted’ Armenians in the Russian state.’

In 1701, in Moscow, Armenian national-liberation movement activist Israel Ori
came to meet Peter I outlining to him his so-called `Moscow Project’ of
Armenia’s liberation, which Peter agreed to implement after Russia’s war
against the Swedes. On the basis of this agreement the Russian government
developed a project of establishing a buffer Armenian-Georgian united
Christian state.

But in 1720, not being able to help the Armenian rebels in Artsakh and Syunik,
Emperor Peter sent a delegate to encourage Armenians. A year before his death,
in November 1724, the Russian emperor issued an edict about taking the
Armenian people under his patronage.

According to architect Alexanyan, words of Peter that reflect his thoughts
about Armenia will be placed on the monument which perhaps will explain the
logic of the Russian tsar in the Armenian capital.

`There are such thoughts,’ Alexanyan assures. `One simply has to gather
them . . .’

School of Thought: Turks and Hyes find friendship during summer study
By Arpi Harutyunyan
ArmeniaNow reporter
A group of Armenian students have learned that it takes only a week to reshape
views that have been decades in the making. Turks and Armenians can be
friends, they say.
Last month, 12 university students from Armenia spent a week studying with
Turkish students in Antakia, Turkey (Antakia is the historical Antioch that
was the southern seat of the Armenian kingdom in 83-69 B.C. during the reign
of Tigran the Great).

`The aim of the summer school was not to achieve historical truth. We just
wanted the young people of the nations to get in touch, know each other and be
able to build trust between the two countries,’ explains Isabella Sargsyan,
coordinator of youth programs of the Armenian committee of the Helsinki Civil
Assembly ().

It appears that, in at least come cases, the program was a success.

`After becoming acquainted with them for several days I understood that
Armenians and Turks can make the best friends in the world and be honest
neighbors,’ says Magda Markosyan, 20 a student of the Yerevan State University
Department of Economics. `There is just the need to first of all agree on
the `Armenian Question’, and then we, Armenian young people, should realize
the present-day young people are not responsible for the atrocities of the
past. We, more than other nations, have many similarities.’

During the week, students studied issues such as Nationalism, Problems of
Social Individualism in Globalization Era, Peaceful Journalism. Lectures were
led by Turkish and Armenian specialists.

`The topic of my report that referred to the field of Non-Governmental
Organizations in Armenia changed there when I understood that some of the
Turkish students know almost nothing about Armenia,’ Sargsyan said. `Therefore
I first of all told about what Armenia is like, where it is, what statehood it
has, then I turned to the core topic.’

According to the Armenian students the friendly attitude of the young Turkish
people is explained also by a lack of information about Armenia. In contrast
to the Armenian side the young Turkish people have learnt about historic
Armenia only by means of several sentences in the textbooks that can hardly
cause deep hatred.

The idea for the summer studies came from Turkey two or three years ago, and
was realized this year due to funding from the Council of Europe.

`We Armenians have constantly received an anti-Turkish upbringing,’ says
Yerevan State University Department of Political Science student Gayane
Vardanyan. `We left for Turkey carrying that in mind. At the beginning I was
so stressed that I did not want even to smile. But gradually I became
comfortable. I even felt I am making friends and loving my Turkish mates.’

The Armenian students say their hosts actively tried to establish friendly
relations. And the ice broke on the moment when one of the Turkish guys began
singing an Armenian song.

`It is amazing, but there were those among the Turkish students who even said
they are ready to accept that their ancestors have committed genocide,’ says
Lusine Grigoryan, student at the Journalism Department, Yerevan State
University.

(On the other hand, the Armenians weren’t challenged to accept Turkey’s
version of history. The Turks say that, friendly relations aside, the
Armenians’ attitude is unbending and senseless to challenge.)

Yes, I asked. They answered me that Turkish side realized that irrespective of
good relations, Armenians’ attitude is unbending in that problem and it’s
senseless to speak about it.

During the course of study, the Turks and Armenians went to the famed Armenian
territory of Musa Ler (site of the popular historical novel `Forty Days at
Musa Dagh’). There, they participated in the blessing of the grape harvest, an
Armenian tradition.

`I was trembling while watching the young Turkish people entering the round
dance of Armenians and begin dancing with the same spirit,’ says Magda
Markosyan.. `And I was especially touched when one of the students began
weeping during the mass in the Armenian church.’

The organizers of the summer school say the results exceeded their
expectations. The Armenian side aims to organize a similar summer school for
next summer, in Gyumri.

http://hdr.undp.org
http://forum.hayastan.com/index.php?
www.armenianow.com
www.crisisgroup.org
www.calistomedical.com
www.usatg.org
www.hra.am

BAKU: Azeri president, EU envoy discuss ties, Karabakh

Azeri president, EU envoy discuss ties, Karabakh

ANS TV, Baku
14 Sep 05

President Ilham Aliyev today received a delegation led by Heikki
Talvitie, special envoy of the EU for the South Caucasus.

They discussed the resolution of the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict, the
forthcoming parliamentary election in Azerbaijan, cooperation between
Azerbaijan and the EU and other issues.
[Video showed the meeting]

NKR MFA: ICG report will have positive impact on Karabakh settlement

Pan Armenian News

NKR MFA: ICG REPORT WILL HAVE POSITIVE IMPACT ON KARABAKH SETTLEMENT

16.09.2005 07:47

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Nagorno Karabakh Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA)
will soon express its position over the International Crisis Group (ICG)
report over Karabakh settlement, NKR FM Arman Melikyan said in the course of
a meeting with journalists September 16. `We now discuss the report, there
are certain approaches already formed. The matter lies not in to which
extent the Armenian or Azeri positions are presented in the report. We
should first of all understand the importance of the report to its authors
and the goals it should serve in the future. Obviously, the report is drawn
to assist the talks and may be used by the OSCE Minsk Group mediators and
other structures. Undoubtedly, the report includes provisions that we
consider unbiased and expedient. There are also provisions, which are in
conflict with our positions. However, undoubtedly, the report authors are
skilled professionals and they understand very well which work they do and
to what end. Having studied the report in detail we will prepare our written
comment, which I suppose to be very voluminous,’ A. Melikyan said. In the
opinion of the NKR FM, the ICG report will have a positive impact, as it
notes rather clearly that Armenia has not occupied any of Azerbaijan’s
territories and the armed forces situated in the territory of NKR are in
fact subordinated to the NKR authorities, IA Regnum reported.

BAKU: CoE can’t help Azerbaijan draw up list of voters in Karabakh

Council of Europe can’t help Azerbaijan draw up list of voters in Karabakh

Azad Azarbaycan TV, Baku
15 Sep 05

[Presenter] The Council of Europe will not be able to help Azerbaijan
draw up a list of voters [Azerbaijani citizens of Armenian origin] in
Xankandi constituency No 122. This is explained by the fact the
Council of Europe’s Baku office received the appeal regarding the
problem too late.

[Representative of the Council of Europe secretary-general, Mats
Lindberg, speaking to microphone in English with Azeri voice-over] The
Central Electoral Commission asked us very recently to help them from
a technical standpoint, that’s to say to draw up a list of voters. The
issue cannot be dealt with as we received the appeal too late. We will
try to give more detailed and precise information about this soon.

Breakaway Regions Seek Closer Ties With Russia

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty – Czech republic
Sept 15 2005

Breakaway Regions Seek Closer Ties With Russia

14 September 2005 — Representatives of four regions that have broken
away from ex-Soviet republics reiterated their intention in Moscow
today to seek international recognition and closer ties with Russia.

A Russian lawmaker said it was about time the breakaway regions were
recognized as states.

Representatives of Georgia’s breakaway republics of Abkhazia and
South Ossetia, the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh disputed by Azerbaijan
and Armenia, and Moldova’s Transdniester region met in Moscow and
pledged to pursue independence.

Konstantin Zatulin, a lawmaker from the Kremlin-directed United
Russia party, called the sovereignty of these entities a reality that
should be accepted.

BAKU: Another suspect in youth movement chair’s case

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Sept 15 2005

Another suspect in youth movement chair’s case

Baku, September 14, AssA-Irada

Deputy chairman of the Yeni Fikir youth movement was detained over
the case of Ruslan Bashirli, the movement chair charged with plotting
with Armenian intelligence to stage a coup in Azerbaijan.
The police arrested Ramin Taghiyev for 48 hours as a suspect, said
Ali Karimli, chairman of major opposition Popular Front Party (PFPA),
who is known to maintain close ties with the movement.
Karimli, speaking at a news conference at the PFPA office on
Wednesday, termed the apprehension as the authorities’ `repressions’
against Yeni Fikir. Touching upon the earlier arrests of Bashirli and
another representative of the movement, Karimli said the authorities
are thus trying to `estrange politically-active youth’ from the
forthcoming parliamentary elections. The PFPA chairman did not rule
out that other movement members may be arrested over the next few
days as well.
Karimli said that youth organizations of PFPA plan to start series of
actions shortly in protest against `pressures against Yeni Fikir’.
Those of two other major opposition parties represented in the
Azadlig bloc – Musavat and Azerbaijan Democratic Party – will join
the protests, he said.
`Harsh messages will come shortly for the authorities from the West
over the repressions against differently-minded youth. I have
informed the European Union special envoy on South Caucasus Heikki
Talvitie about the considerable decline of Yeni Fikir deputy chairman
Seyid Nuriyev’s health and the arrest of Ramin Taghiyev. Talvitie has
acutely condemned these steps by the authorities and said that such
attitude toward young people is unacceptable. Europe will voice its
harsh position on these repressions in the coming days.’*

AGBU San Diego Kicks Off Cultural Series With Wines of Armenia Event

PRESS RELEASE
AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x137
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:

Friday, September 16, 2005

AGBU SAN DIEGO KICKS OFF CULTURAL SERIES WITH WINES OF ARMENIA EVENT

San Diego, CA – The first in an upcoming series of cultural events,
AGBU San Diego organized a wine tasting event on August 7, 2005
entitled “Wines of Armenia” with the Honorable Gagik Kirakosian,
Consul General of Armenia, as guest of honor. The event held at the
Rancho Bernardo Courtyard attracted over 125 attendees from the San
Diego area, as well as neighboring Orange County, Los Angeles and
Indian Wells.

After welcoming remarks, AGBU San Diego Chair Ani Kalayjian Lanuza
introduced Kirakosian, who summarized the Embassy’s current projects
and initiatives. Other speakers included Honorable Joe Kellejian,
Solana Beach Council Member and three-time Mayor, who presented
Kirakosian with the key to the City of San Diego; Vahe Imasdounian,
AGBU Southern California District Committee (SCDC) Chair; and
Archpriest Reverend Father Datev Tatoulian.

Guest Paul Kousharian praised the event for its high caliber and
impressive attendance of key community leaders. Kousharian was the
former AGBU SCDC Secretary/Treasurer and was instrumental in
revitalizing the AGBU San Diego Chapter two years ago.

The evening was underwritten by the generous contributions of Stella
Bartholomew, Alan Yaghdjian, owner of Rancho Bernardo Courtyard,
Mr. and Mrs. Paul & Rosemarie Kalemkierian, and Gourgen Darbinyan of
Importers Direct Wholesale Co.

AGBU San Diego is dedicated to preserving and promoting the Armenian
identity and heritage through humanitarian, educational and cultural
programs. For more information, please contact AGBU San Diego by
emailing [email protected].

For more information on AGBU and its worldwide chapters, please visit

www.agbu.org
www.agbu.org.

Statement from Congresswoman Betty McCollum on the Armenian Genocide

Congresswoman Betty McCollum
Serving Minnesota’s 4th Congressional District
1029 Longworth HOB w Washington, DC 20515

For Immediate Release: September 15, 2005

Contact: Dany Khy (202) 225-6631 / [email protected]

Statement from Congresswoman Betty McCollum (MN-04) on the Armenian Genocide

Washington, D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Betty McCollum (MN-04) made the
following statement in the U.S. House International Relations Committee
during debate of H.Con.Res.195, a resolution to commemorate the Armenian
Genocide of 1915-1923:

“I had an opportunity to attend in St. Paul a remembrance of the victims of
the Armenian genocide. The Armenian community warmly embraced and said
prayers for the victims of the ongoing genocide in Darfur.

“One and a half million people died under a former government, the Ottoman
regime. It is important to remember Mr. Schiff’s statement about the age of
the survivors of the genocide. We are running out of time as an
international community to move toward peace and reconciliation. We are
running out of time for the victims and those who remember the tragedy to
come together and heal.

“I am pleased that a joint commission is being discussed. I’ve spoken to
people in Turkey and to people within the Turkish government who would like
to see reconciliation move forward.

“The fact that the Turkish government has not moved as quickly as many of us
would like is important. Equally important is that there are many in Turkey
who realize that truth and reconciliation, and a recognition in history,
will go a long way in healing many wounds.

“We need to look at what has happened in history in order to move forward
with reconciliation. Look at our own history with the Native Americans and
the Japanese internment. In my state of Minnesota, people with mental
illness were warehoused, buried without even a marker to recognize them as
individuals.

“We have to acknowledge when we’ve had failures. We have to acknowledge
when we’ve hurt one another. The failure to do so sends the wrong signal to
our children, that it doesn’t matter what you do, people will forget about
it. It sends the wrong message, that there’s no lesson to be learned from
treating each other cruelly and inhumanely. There’s no judgment.

“I support both resolutions recognizing the Armenian genocide [H.Con.Res.
195 and H.Res. 316]. However, I would like to say this to the Turkish
government: you are moving forward; slowly but forward. I appreciate,
respect and acknowledge that, but time is running out.

“As a member of the International Relations Committee, it is my
responsibility to try to be consistent on policies. I recognized genocide
in Darfur. I saw it with my own eyes – I witnessed a government attacking
its own citizens. For me, the atrocities that occurred under the Ottoman
Empire, not the Turkish Republic, but the Ottoman Empire, were similar — a
government attacking its own citizens. Fortunately, that government no
longer exists. However, people living in the region must have an accurate
reflection of history in order to move forward toward peace and
reconciliation.

“And to the Turkish government, I would also like to say, as I said to the
Turkish Ambassador when he was in my office shortly after the Turkish
Parliament took a vote not to allow U.S. troops: I respect their
sovereignty. I respect their democracy and I respect their right to
determine how they will be engaged in policy.”

####

http://www.mccollum.house.gov

“Jews Are News”

‘JEWS ARE NEWS’

Maclean’s, Canada
September 12, 2005

Why does the Nazi Holocaust preoccupy us more than any other genocide?

In this excerpt from Beethoven’s Mask, heavily condensed by
Maclean’s, Toronto-based author and journalist George Jonas refutes
the popular notions — articulated, among other places, in Daniel
Jonah Goldhagen’s book Hitler’s Willing Executioners — that the
Holocaust was a unique event, and that it arose from a peculiarly
German kind of anti-Semitism.

I SPENT the first 10 years of my life in Nazioccupied Europe. My
immediate family and I survived the war by hiding. Since I kept no
diary, had the Nazis found me as they had found Anne Frank, I would
have disappeared without a trace. This would undoubtedly have made
the Holocaust a singular and unique event for me. I am less sure
about the Holocaust having been a singular and unique event in world
history. To me it seems that it was one of many horrifying holocausts,
albeit of immense proportions. I also doubt that the Holocaust was the
inevitable result of anti-Semitism, and especially that the Holocaust
was inevitably caused by a singular and unique type of anti-Semitism
peculiar to Germany.

Goldhagen’s thesis is that the Holocaust could never have happened
without the participation of ordinary Germans, who participated
because they were virulently anti-Semitic. This is true enough as far
as it goes, but it does not go very far. Saying that Hitler could not
have killed six million Jews without the participation of many other
people, and that people who participate in the wholesale slaughter
of Jews are likely to be virulently anti-Semitic, is saying something
singularly self-evident.

Goldhagen contends that German people and culture were anti-Semitic in
a unique way that he calls “eliminationist.” For proof, he documents
the historic existence of German anti-Semitic ideas and policies
exhaustively and convincingly. But he offers no proof of its German
singularity, or that “eliminationist” anti-Semitism can be taken as
a precursor to, or at least a portent of, genocide.

Proof would be hard to come by, for history shows no inevitable link
between anti-Semitism — or any other type of racial, ethnic, class, or
religious prejudice or hatred — and genocide. What’s more, traditional
German prejudice against Jews, though widespread and intense, was
less acute than traditional Polish prejudice, and not significantly
more acute than French prejudice. Before Hitler’s time, Jews often
emigrated to Germany to escape worse discrimination elsewhere.

Was German anti-Semitism before the Hitler era materially different
from anti-Semitism in other times and places? I believe it was not.

Modern anti-Semitism developed side by side with nationalism, as
older organizing principles of the social order weakened. Ironically,
it came as a by-product of the Enlightenment. As the dynastic and
religious systems by which groups used to define themselves were losing
their grip, people were gradually beginning to think of themselves as
“Russians” rather than subjects of the Czars, or “Germans” rather than
subjects of the Hohenzollern emperors. The one-time vassals of the
Bourbons were turning into the Gallic sons and daughters of Marianne,
the emblematic figure of the French Revolution. The pilgrims and
warriors of Christendom or Islam were evolving into “Italians” or
“Turks.”

Such definitions inevitably put a premium on ethnic identity.

Suddenly Jews were no longer patches in the colourful tapestry of
empires, but alien and potentially baneful cells in the bloodstream
of nations. As national identities assumed greater importance, a new
type of anti-Semitism was born.

But these modern, populist-nationalist-racist elements existed in the
anti-Semitic laws and opinion of all contemporary cultures, not only
in Germany’s. The “Jewish question,” so-called, was raised by almost
every nation from the mid-19th to the mid-20th century. Raising it
was regarded as legitimate.

Why, then, did the Holocaust occur in Germany and not in some
other country? There is a danger of replying to this by attributing
some peculiar evil to Germans as a group — i.e., as a “race.” To
his credit, Goldhagen takes great pains to avoid it. The problem is,
unless we postulate evil, there is little in German history or culture
to provide an alternative explanation. Germany’s traditions were
no less rational, no less civilized, no less chivalrous, than other
Western traditions during the same period. Her public laws and civic
morality, the personal habits of her citizens, their ethical precepts,
their customary religious beliefs, were not markedly different from
those of the citizens of other European nations.

German art, science, industry, and infrastructure were, if anything,
more advanced. Although the governmental institutions in Germany’s
recent past were more autocratic than those of France and England,
not to mention the United States, they were not nearly as autocratic
as many other countries’. In any event, by the time Hitler came to
power, the Weimar Republic was a democracy.

Jews in Germany were well integrated — not only far better than the
Jews of Poland or Russia, but on the whole better than the Jews in
many Western countries, including even the United States and Canada.

Most German Jews were German patriots. Though after their emancipation
in the mid-18th century, their contribution to music, arts, sciences,
commerce, literature, journalism and even politics far exceeded their
numbers (about one per cent) in Germany’s population, Germany’s
institutions were not overwhelmed by Jews (though this became a
frequent explanation offered by anti-Semites for their anti-Semitism),
not even to the extent that Austria’s or Hungary’s might have been. One
looks in vain for a rational — or even irrational — explanation
for a supposed “unique hatred” in the history of the relationship
between Jews and Germans. The search turns up nothing.

What, then, is the answer? Why did the Holocaust occur in Germany? We
can certainly view traditional German anti-Semitism as one contributing
cause. Hitler himself must be considered a significant factor. A
charismatic leader is like an ignition source, a spark: utterly
insignificant in the absence of an explosive mixture, but the direct
cause of a blow-up in a place filled with combustible fumes.

In another country — or in Germany in another historic period —
Hitler might have died unnoticed in a flophouse or in a mental
institution. But he was where he was, therefore he did what he did.

The Holocaust would not have happened without him.

There were many reasons for Germany being unlike other countries
in the 1920s. Other countries lacked the shock that follows losing
a war that the Germans believed they were winning almost until the
last minute. The national trauma of that unexpected blow is still
insufficiently understood outside Germany. It was inevitable for
conspiracy theories to start flourishing after such a traumatic
event. The soil for Nazism was prepared by German indignation. It
sparked an immediate search for scapegoats. It seemed natural to
include Jews in this conspiracy.

The super-inflation that started in 1922 and lasted until 1924 was
devastating. The stock market crash of 1929 was undoubtedly a factor,
but the Depression did not necessarily lead to the rise of totalitarian
systems elsewhere. More significant was the rare, maybe even unique,
vulnerability of the Weimar Republic. Conventional analysis often
blames the treaty of Versailles for the rise of Nazism, but the status
of Germany as an adolescent democracy was at least as important. This
almost teenage-like stage in the nation’s life probably had more to do
with the irrational eruptions in Germany’s soul than any other factor.

Mature democracies, such as the United States or Great Britain, with
solid traditions of both individual liberty and checks and balances
on the exercise of power, would have been far more resistant to the
totalitarian nature of Nazism than Germany. Additionally, a class
society such as Britain’s would have been far more resistant to letting
a party composed of tradesmen and petty officials grab the helm of
the ship of the state. Social snobbery alone would have prevented a
corporal like Hitler from becoming supreme leader of England.

But there is something even more important. The seemingly
insurmountable hurdle of “Why in Germany?” vanishes if we stop
insisting on the Holocaust as a unique and singular event. If it were
unique, we could scarcely explain it, in spite of all the points listed
above, except by attributing to Germans an inherent, subhuman barbarity
that comes perilously close, no matter how we try to get around it,
to the inherent, subhuman malice the Nazis attributed to Jews.

A race of barbarians with inherent streaks of virulent anti-Semitism
does not metamorphose into a race of liberal humanists overnight,
as Goldhagen incongruously insists in his book. The influence of
postwar education could not achieve such a miracle. If Germans are
not genocidally anti-Semitic today — as indeed they are not — it
is because Germans were never uniquely or inherently genocidal or
anti-Semitic. They were just situational murderers between 1933 and
1945, as many groups have been at one period or another.

If we view the monstrous tragedy of the Holocaust as only one of many
such monstrous tragedies in human history, then the accurate question
becomes “Why not in Germany?” Why could Germans not do evil in the
same way that so many other people have done?

“I would suggest that barbarism be considered as a permanent and
universal human characteristic which becomes more or less pronounced
according to the play of circumstances.” The French Catholic
philosopher Simone Weil, a converted Jew, wrote these lines in 1940.

The years since have given us no better insight.

A different question: If there is nothing unique about the Nazi
Holocaust (aside perhaps from its dimension), why does it preoccupy
us more than other holocausts?

Match it, for instance, with our attitude to the Communist holocaust.

While Nazi criminals who played a direct role in the murder of six
million are still hunted down and tried, we rarely prosecute Communist
criminals of similar degrees of responsibility.

(Interestingly, almost all the exceptions occurred in Germany, which
did prosecute some former East German officials after unification.)
Elsewhere it has been more usual for ex-functionaries of KGB- or
Gulagtype organizations to receive government positions or pensions.

The Nazi Party was immediately outlawed in post-war Germany. The
Communist Party, in contrast, is still the official opposition in
the former Soviet Union. Ex-Nazi officials like Kurt Waldheim, once
discovered, became international untouchables. Ex-Communist officials
like Mikhail Gorbachev are still asked to join think-tanks or lecture
at Western universities. It would be unthinkable for known ex-Nazis
to be invited to the same diplomatic cocktail receptions in Western
countries at which ex-Communists, or even current Communists, are
honoured guests. And imagine a former Gestapo officer being accepted
as the president of post-Nazi Germany, the way ex-KGB officer Vladimir
Putin has been accepted as the president of post-Soviet Russia.

Why do we react to the Nazi Holocaust and the Communist holocaust
differently? It is possible to postulate the following answers:

To begin with, the Holocaust provided people with the initial images
of mass slaughter as the Nazi death camps were being liberated.

Cinemas around the world showed — for the first time in history —
heaps of skeletal corpses being pushed into mass graves by bulldozers,
along with mounds of footwear, gold teeth, artifacts alleged to have
been made of human skin, and charred remains inside the incinerators
of Auschwitz. No ordinary person had ever seen anything like it. Those
inaugural images literally shocked the world’s conscience.

The Communist holocausts provided no comparable photo opportunities.

The islands of the Gulag deep inside the Soviet Union or China remained
inaccessible to the cameras of the Western media. Their millions of
victims between the 1920s and the 1980s perished unseen.

By the time a few snippets appeared on television screens, such as
the aftermath of the holocaust in Cambodia, audiences had become
inured to death and destruction through repeated exposure. Pictures
of slaughter in people’s living rooms became commonplace during the
television coverage of the Vietnam War. By the end of the 1970s,
photographic images had lost their power to shock.

Another contributing reason, at least until recently, was the
contrasting attitude many opinion makers had to Nazism as opposed
to Communism. Identical as the two intoxicants may have been,
intellectuals could get drunk on the wine of one far more easily
than the other. Nazism never “travelled,” to borrow an expression
from viticulture. Communism did.

There were self-evident reasons for this. It would have been
nonsensical for ideas of German superiority to become an export item
for non-Germans, or ideas of Aryan superiority for non-Aryans.

Marxist notions of the class struggle faced no similar obstacles. In
addition, Nazism as a social theory could rely on nothing but the
coldest and most selfish of human impulses to justify its call for
conquest and slaughter, but Communism could also enlist warm and
humane impulses of altruism to rationalize its own genocides.

Next, given that Nazism suffered an abject military defeat within
a decade of its emergence, while Communism appeared to march from
triumph to triumph until the mid-1980s, it is not surprising that
generations of opinion makers in academia, journalism and government
have been reluctant to discuss acts of Communist genocide in the same
breath with Nazi acts of genocide. To this day, Communist holocausts
may be respectably denied in countries whose laws treat the denial
of the Nazi Holocaust as a crime.

World opinion has also been affected by the fact that the largest
single group of Hitler’s victims were Jews. Murdering six million
members of one group does not have exactly the same consequences as
murdering six million members of another. Recent massacres of Mayans,
Moluccans or Kurds have not resulted in the same echo as earlier
massacres of Armenians. The opprobrium that attaches to genocide will
vary not only with the slaughter’s magnitude, cruelty, irrationality,
documentability and scope, but also with the ability of its victims
and survivors to attract attention and sympathy.

All victims are equal in their desire for, and entitlement to,
the world’s notice, but they are not always equal in their capacity
to capture it. When Germans decided to exterminate the Jews, they
picked the wrong group. As individuals, Jews tended to be gifted and
articulate. As an aggregate, they were well placed to disseminate
information, especially in the Western hemisphere. Traditional
Jewish occupations, in addition to science, business and the law,
included such natural forums as the literary arts, the entertainment
industry and the media. What’s more, the Diaspora spread Jews all over
the globe. Many rose to prominence in various fields. Jews always
amounted to a constituency in many key nations, at least in weight
if not in numbers. “Jews are news,” as an eminent Western scholar on
Islam quipped in a speech in 2002, quoting an old witticism.

Anti-Semites have often pounced on these characteristics, distorted
them, or used them illegitimately, mixed with false ones of their
own invention, to raise the spectre of a mythical “Jewish conspiracy.”

That is poisonous rubbish, but it does not mean that some of these
characteristics do not exist. It is hardly surprising that Jews were
traumatized by Nazism and resented being murdered. As they had the
necessary attributes to attract public attention, they relied on them
— especially after the Holocaust — in self-defence.

Still, the foremost reason for which we view the Holocaust not only
as one of many such abysses in humanity’s past, but as a unique
occurrence and the epitome of evil, is probably different. Germany
was Europe’s most cultured nation. It was a nation of Kant, Beethoven
and Goethe. Even if only a minuscule minority of its Nazis read poetry
or played Mozart on the piano, the gulf between the cultural history
of Germany’s inhabitants and their barbaric behaviour during the Nazi
era was incomprehensibly wide. It stunned their victims as it stunned
the world.

The scope and barbarity of the Holocaust would have been stunning
even if carried out by headhunters from Borneo, but it was not. It was
carried out by Germans. It may be difficult for post-war generations
raised in the last half century — during which Germans became
equated with the Nazi salute, not only in popular entertainment but
also in political and academic discourse — to understand the sheer
bewilderment people felt in the decade between the mid-1930s and the
1940s as they were gradually discovering the full extent of the vulgar
brutality of Hitler’s regime. It did not seem “typically” German, as we
might think of it today, but fundamentally un-German. It did not fit.

At the risk of trivializing a cataclysmic event by a facile metaphor,
the Holocaust was like a society murder. Society murders become
notorious because of the contrast between the criminal and the crime.

Butchery in the slums hardly makes the back pages, but the same act
committed in a mansion becomes headline news. The crimes of a serial
killer would be noted in any event, but if Jack the Ripper turns out
to be the Archbishop of Canterbury, it occupies a unique place in
the annals of crime. It becomes singular. This, I suggest, is what
happened in 1945 when the Allies entered Bergen-Belsen and revealed
the Germans to the world as mass murderers.

It is the human race that is genocidal, not the Germans. Saying this
is not to excuse the Germans, but to note a fact. In one vital sense
we are all Jews and we are all Germans, potentially, depending on the
conditions in which we find ourselves. Remembering this may reduce
the likelihood that we will ever be Jews or Germans again as Jews or
Germans were during one night-marish period between 1933 and 1945.

Reprinted with permission of Key Porter Books from Beethoven’s Mask:
Notes on My Life and Times by George Jonas.

For original reprints (with graphics) available

http://www.rsicopyright.com/ics/prc_main/prs_request.html/