OSCE PA Hopes For Peaceful Resolution Of Armenia Crisis

OSCE PA HOPES FOR PEACEFUL RESOLUTION OF ARMENIA CRISIS

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.02.2008 15:05 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "There is an impression that the quality of
the presidential election has become a topic of hot debate," OSCE
Parliamentary Assembly President Goran Lennmarker

The OSCE PA and OSCE/ODIHR were unanimous on the preliminary report
on the election process. A final report that will embrace the
post-election situation in the republic will be issued later," he
said. "As to the arrests, I was told that those people were detained
for storage of weapons. I can’t say whether it’s true or not. It’s
a bit hard for a foreigner to make assessments in such cases."

Mr Lennmarker voiced hope that the crises will be resolved
peacefully. "Some opposition parties informed me that they will
address to the Constitutional Court and submit to its decision,"
he said, adding that OSCE PA will not issue a separate report on
Armenia’s presidential election but will build its assessment on the
basis of the OSCE/ODIHR statement due in mid-April, FRE/RL reports.

On February 20, the International Observation Mission said that the
presidential election in Armenia "was conducted mostly in line with
the country’s international commitments."

OSCE Chair-In-Office Content With Position Of Nagorno-Karabakh Leade

OSCE CHAIR-IN-OFFICE CONTENT WITH POSITION OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH LEADERSHIP

DE FACTO
Feb 26, 2008

YEREVAN, 26.02.08. DE FACTO. The issues referring to the Karabakh
conflict settlement were discussed February 26 in Yerevan in the course
of a bilateral meeting of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic President
Bako Sahakian with OSCE Chair-in-Office, Finland’s FM Ilkka Kanerva.

The interlocutors, in part, discussed the issues referring to
the realization of monitorings on the NKR and Azeri Armed Forces’
contact line. The parties set forward a number of proposals. Upon the
completion of the talks a joint press conference of the NKR President
Bako Sahakian and the OSCE Chair-in-Office Ilkka Kanerva was held.

Touching upon the results of the bilateral talks held with the Karabakh
party, the OSCE Chair-in-Office expressed satisfaction with the fact
that the Nagorno-Karabakh political leadership had reaffirmed its
adherence to the peaceful settlement of the issue. Ilkka Kanerva noted
it was very important for him to visit both Armenia and Azerbaijan and
consider the situation from the position of both parties. He stated
Finland, as the country chairing the OSCE, supported the issue’s
constructive settlement and searched for the ways of its solution.

The OSCE Chair-in-Office noted he had already met with RA President,
RA FM and other officials. "The Karabakh issue was one of the principal
items in our agenda", the OSCE Chair-in-Office said.

Answering a question if the OSCE Chair-in-Office endorsed the opinion
that the OSCE Minsk group had been exhausted Ilkka Kanerva noted he
did not see serious arguments that could convince him in it. "The
Minsk group, in my opinion, makes its additional contribution to the
process of the issue’s settlement, enhances confidence between the
parties and is a guarantor of achieving positive result. The Minsk
group is an effective mechanism", the OSCE Chair-in-Office noted.

At the same time, the OSCE Chair-in-Office underscored the importance
of continuation of contacts and meetings between Armenian and
Azerbaijani Presidents.

Touching on the perspectives of advancement of the settlement process
Ilkka Kanerva noted, "When the situation created in connection with
presidential elections in Armenia already becomes a historic event,
I think we’ll have a big ground for growing optimism apropos of the
Nagorno-Karabakh issue’s settlement".

Touching upon the issue referring to Azerbaijani party’s militaristic
statements Ilkka Kanerva said, "in the course of political debates,
before the issue’ settlement is achieved, strong expressions are
used sometimes, however, they cannot have a positive influence on
the issue’s resolution".

RA Foreign Minister Hopes To See Progress In Karabakh Settlement Bef

RA FOREIGN MINISTER HOPES TO SEE PROGRESS IN KARABAKH SETTLEMENT BEFORE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN AZERBAIJAN

ARKA
Feb 25, 2008

YEREVAN, February 25. /ARKA/. Armenian Foreign Ministry hopes to
see progress in the Nagorno Karabakh conflict before the Azerbaijani
presidential elections, Minister Vardan Oskanyan told a Monday news
conference.

Oskanyan said the problems connected with Armenia’s presidential
elections won’t hinder the negotiation process. After the newly elected
president of Armenia Serge Sargssyan is sworn in, the ceremony to take
place on April 9, he will get actively involved in the negotiation
process.

Oskanyan said EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus Peter
Semneby has already urged the Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents to
hold a bilateral meeting in the near future. No date for the meeting
has been set yet.

"The newly elected Armenian president has a clear idea of the peaceful
settlement process, he is well aware of the contents of the documents
put on the negotiation table, as well as the common principles of
which Armenia approves," Oskanyan said.

The Karabakh conflict started in 1988, when Nagorny Karabakh,
mostly populated with Armenians, declared independence from
Azerbaijan. Large-scale combat operations followed leading to
Azerbaijan’s loss of control over Karabakh and seven bordering regions.

On May 12, 1994, an agreement was signed on ceasefire in the area of
the conflict which had killed 25.000-30,000 people in both sides and
forced about one million people to leave their homes. The ceasefire
regime is effective up to date.

Since 1992, negotiations for a peaceful settlement of the conflict
have been conducted within the OSCE Minsk Group co-chaired by the USA,
Russia, and France.

RA Prime Minister Serge Sargssyan got 862,369 votes (52.82%) to
win an outright victory in the February 19 presidential elections
with ex-president Levon Ter-Petrossyan lagging on 351,222 votes
(21.5%).

BAKU: Russian expert: Armenia should appeal to UNSC for settlement

Today.Az, Azerbaijan
Feb. 26, 2008

Russian expert Natalia Moshenskaya: "Armenia should appeal to UN
Security Council for the settlement of the Karabakh conflict"

26 February 2008 [10:45] – Today.Az

"Armenia should appeal to the UN Security Council for the settlement
of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict".

The due announcement was made by Natalia Moshenskaya, deputy
chairman of the Executive Committee of the Russian public
organization "Youth Union of Lawyers".

"Armenia can appeal to the UN International tribunal by means of the
UN Security Council for getting a consultative conclusion on
qualification of public announcements of Azerbaijan’s senior
officials", Moshenskaya noted at a two-day international conference
"Problems of tolerance and xenophobia in the South Caucasus region"
on the 20th anniversary of events in Sumgayit.

She said the issue should be formed in the context of weather the
announcements of Azerbaijani officials which state the intention to
terminate the people of another country are legal.

"Announcements of Azerbaijani leadership can lay a foundation for
international and legal reaction of Armenia, as well as a community
on the whole. Why is Iranian President not allowed to threaten to
Israel, while President of Azerbaijan may threaten to Armenia. We are
all equal before international law", Moshenskaya noted.

She said the militaristic announcements of senior officials of
official Baku allow to propose that Azerbaijan intends to attack
Armenia, which is more than xenophobia, which is a threat to a
sovereignty, peace and security of the community on the whole.

"The said announcements can be qualified as threats of force and we
can speak here about state terrorism as an ideology and practice of
threats. The behavior of Azerbaijani leadership is incompatiable with
principles of the UN charter, which is a violation of the
international law", Moshenskaya said.

Moshenskaya noted that Armenia may reject to accept the illegal
regime of Azerbaijan "with all consequences, including rejection to
resume negotiation process on Nagorno Karabakh conflict".

She said another form of reaction may be an appeal to international
organizations. "Armenia may appeal to UN, OSCE, OTCS. Moreover,
Armenia and Russia have signed a contract on friendship and
cooperation, which means that any threat addressed to Armenia is a
threat to Russia, as well", Moshenskaya noted.

/Novosti-Armenia/

Companions in suffering, An Interview with Thea Halo

Assyria Times, CA
Feb. 25, 2008

Companions in suffering, An Interview with Thea Halo

2/24/2008 15:15:00
By Khatchig Mouradian
AztagDaily.com

"Memory is the only way home", says the American author, Terry
Tempest Williams. And memory was Sano Halo’s only guide, as she
embarked, with her daughter, Thea, on a journey to Turkey in search
of Sano’s home, 70 years after her exile. It also seems that home is
the only way to memory; it is only there, in modern-day Turkey, that
Thea "fully embraced" herself. "It was the first time I felt
connected to my heritage", she says in this interview. "I didn’t have
a heritage until I stood on my mother’s land and then on my father’s
land. For the first time in my life I felt connected to these people,
who were finally my people", she adds.

A journey is incomplete, I believe, if it does not pave way for
another trek. After Thea Halo had visited her Pontic Greek mother’s
and Assyrian father’s lands, she embarked on another pilgrimage, that
of the mind and the soul, to discover and help preserve a history
much forgotten and a genocide barely remembered. The culmination of
this pilgrimage was Not Even My Name, a book that recounts, through
Sano Halo’s survival story, the genocides of the Armenians, Pontic
Greeks and Assyrians that took place in Ottoman Turkey during and in
the immediate aftermath of World War I.

However, Not Even My Name is also a book about the beautiful things
in life. `I wanted to show the beauty of the Pontic Greek culture, at
least in these three villages, and what they actually lost, because
it is only by seeing the beauty of what was that you can you
understand more fully the tragedy and injustice of what has been
taken away’, says Thea Halo.

`Praising what is lost makes the remembrance dear’, says Shakespeare.

I dedicate this interview to the memory of the hundreds of thousands
of Assyrians and Pontic Greeks that perished in Turkey almost a
century ago, just about the same time that a million and a half
Armenians were marching to their deaths.

Aztag- You often speak about "the exclusivity of suffering." In an
interview you say, `It’s truly unfortunate that many late 20th
Century activists, who work so hard to make the Armenian genocide
known to the world, fail to include their fellow sufferers.’ In your
opinion, what is the reason for this `failure’?

Thea Halo- I have many contacts with Armenians and great affection
and love for them.

It was an Armenian family who rescued my mother when she found
herself destitute and alone in Diyarbekir, and they took her to
safety as their daughter. My aunt was also Armenian. So I feel a very
great affinity for the Armenian people. That’s why I found it truly
disturbing when I discovered that the failure to mention the Genocide
of the Pontic Greeks and Assyrians by many Armenian historians and
activists was not just an oversight, but an actual agenda of
exclusion and denial. The Genocide of the Greeks of Asia Minor are
referred to as "an exchange of population", even though these
historians know that by the time of the exchange in 1923, at least
one million Asia Minor and Pontic Greeks had already been
slaughtered. The Assyrians are never mention at all. Someone once
explained this behavior by telling me, "I’m sure you understand that
these Armenian historians feel so personally tied to this history
because it was a Genocide of their own families and people." And of
course I do understand, because it is the story of the Genocide of my
family and my people, which makes their exclusion even more painful
when the exclusion comes from those who should know better. It also
makes it more reprehensible, and it should stop. The inclusion of the
Greeks and Assyrians does not diminish the horror of what happened to
the Armenians. Even my mother, who lost her own family and people,
always describes the slaughter of the Armenians as truly horrific.

I’ve come to realize that there is a kind of tribalism in the world
that is the cause of almost all the world’s misery. When one thinks
of tribalism, one thinks of underdeveloped or backward nations. But I
use this word "tribal" even for the United States. There is the
greater tribe that makes up the country, and then the sub tribes,
which are the various ethnicities. And there is another tribe, and
that’s the handful of elite who are ruling the world, almost all of
whom do so from behind the scenes, behind the presidency. The
differences of the peoples of the world: language, look, customs,
food, dress, dance, etc., has been something quite exquisite to me
throughout my life. But on the other side of that coin, we have this
drive by the more powerful tribes who think nothing of obliterating
others for their own greed or ideologies. Then we have Genocide.
That’s what happened in Turkey in the first part of the 20th century
during and after WWI. It’s what happened during WWII. It’s what’s
happening today.

I do think what happened in Turkey was a Christian Genocide. But I
don’t think one can simply use that term without differentiating who
the Christians were, because although the Assyrians, Greeks, and
Armenians lived in the same land for thousands of years, their
languages, cultures and histories were unique. It’s important to
acknowledge that there was an Armenian, Assyrian, and a Greek
Genocide, but overall it was a Genocide of the Christian of Asia
Minor. I even differentiate between the Asia Minor Greeks: the
Ionians, Pontians, and Cappadoccians, first because the Pontians had
their own empire, and second, because I think it’s important that we
remember their distinctive historical names and regions in Asia
Minor.

One of the reasons I think the Armenians do themselves a great
disservice by failing to mention the Genocides of the Pontic Greeks
and Assyrians is because there was a small faction of Armenians in
Turkey who were fighting for an independent state for Armenians…
obviously for very good reasons. These so-called "trouble makers"
gave the Turks and their supporters, then and now, the excuse to
blame the victims for their own Genocide, even though the vast
majority of Armenians were simply trying to live their lives. It’s
only when one looks at the scope of the Genocides that the Young Turk
regime perpetrated, and Mustafa Kemal "Attaturk" continued, against
the Armenians, Greeks, and Assyrians, that we see it was not because
some Armenians were causing troubles. Rather, it was a plan to rid
Turkey of the Christian population to fulfill the edict of "Turkey
for the Turks."

Aztag- Why is it that few people have heard about the Genocide of
Assyrians and Pontic Greeks?

Thea Halo- In Greece there are a lot of Pontic Greeks and a number of
books about the Pontic Greek Genocide. They have been working for
recognition for at least 35 years, even here in America. Assyrians
have also worked for many years to get this issue on the table
without much success. I blame this failure mainly on two factors:
One, there were no viable books that told the story of what happened
to the Greeks and Assyrians, until my book, Not Even My Name was
published. But perhaps equally or more important, those with the
strongest voices in our society, have traditionally had this tribal
mentality I speak of. They have wanted to portray their own people as
being exclusive in their suffering, and therefore, have failed to
even make mention of the Genocide of other ethnic peoples. Until
quite recently, Jewish historians and activists only focused on what
happened to the Jews during WWII. There was a doctrine that the
Holocaust is the definitive Genocide and therefore one need not look
further to understand the phenomena of Genocide. The study of the
Holocaust became a mandatory part of the curriculum in many, if not
all, schools in the US. But the other ethnic, religious, or social
groups slaughtered by the Nazis were not mentioned, and other
Genocides were overshadowed or ignored, even the Armenian Genocide.

Now many Jewish Historians have recognized the Armenian Genocide and
Armenians have finally gained a voice. But in turn the Armenian
historians and activists fail to mention the Genocides of their
fellow sufferers: the Assyrians, the Pontic Greeks, and the other
Asia Minor Greeks, even while including other Genocides, such as
those in Rwanda and Cambodia, in so-called "comparative studies"
programs.

Fortunately, not all Armenians believe that the exclusive approach is
the right one.

Aztag- In an interview, you say: `To remember does not mean stirring
up hatred within or without. Hatred destroys what was good and pure
in the past and the present. It simply means to embrace what is
ours.’ It is not easy to overcome feelings of hatred, especially for
the very victims of genocide and their immediate descendants, is it?

Thea Halo- My mother lived through this Genocide; she lost everybody
and everything by the age of ten. She had lived side by side with the
Turks. Turkish villages surrounded the Greek villages. My mother said
they bartered together and had no problems. One can’t say that no
Turk ever attacked a Greek, Armenian, or Assyrian. Of course some
did, for various reasons. But overall, they lived together
peacefully. I’ve heard countless stories from Armenians, Assyrians,
and Greeks, of how Turks saved the lives of their families. My mother
says that you must put blame where blame belongs, on the Turkish
government. If you begin to single out the people of a country, and
forget that whatever they did was instigated or sanctioned by the
government, you will then never get rid of the hatred. This tribal
mentality takes over and goes on and on until we’re all gone, because
there are hatreds that go back thousands of years between almost
every tribe on earth. We must learn to acknowledge the past without
living in the past.

We don’t understand how the past has affected us. Because I was born
and raised in New York City, I can say it hasn’t affected me, but
that’s not true. My parents went through this Genocide. They raised
me, and we don’t know all the subtle ways that their lives and
experiences have affected us. We are the product of our parents. If
we don’t acknowledge their past, and embrace it as part of ours, we
never fully embrace ourselves. Only if we try to understand where we
come from, can we really understand who we are.

Aztag- And when did you yourself come to this understanding?

Thea Halo- It was first when I visited Turkey. It was the first time
I felt connected to my heritage. Here in America, nobody knew who the
Pontic Greeks are. And everybody told me that I couldn’t be Assyrian,
because the Assyrians don’t exist anymore. `How I can be something
that doesn’t exist?’ I used to think. Consequently, I didn’t have a
heritage until I stood on my mother’s land and then on my father’s
land. For the first time in my life I felt connected to these people,
who were finally my people. And after writing my mother’s part of the
story, which included the Genocide of the Pontic Greeks, Assyrians,
and Armenians, I began to research the general history for the book,
and I realized how important their story really is.

The thought that people who had lived in a land for 3 thousand years
and more, could just be wiped from the face of that land and all
memory of them seizes to exist, not only there, but from the face of
the earth, was a powerful testament. That certainly makes the
Genocide complete, when no one has even heard of your people. People
ask me sometimes why I titled the book "Not Even My Name." The reason
was that my mother lost everything, family, home, language, and
country, even her name. But many Pontic Greeks and the Assyrians tell
me that for them the title also has a bigger meaning. It means that
even the names, Pontic Greek and Assyrian, was lost to the world. It
was an interesting revelation for me.

Aztag- Many Armenians attach great importance to the land they lost.
For them the genocide isn’t `simply’ the extermination of 1.5 million
Armenians, it is also the expulsion of an entire people from its land
and the wiping out of a culture. When you speak about your "father’s
land" and your "mother’s land", do you have similar feelings?

Thea Halo- Almost every ancient culture has this attachment to the
land. What else is there without a place to call home? When I stood
on that land, for the first time in my life I could actually feel my
ancestors, my grandparents. They became real to me for the first
time. They were as much a part of that land as the trees, the rocks,
the grasses. Their blood and sweat is mingled with the earth for
thousands of years. How can one walk away from that without feeling
that a part of oneself is somehow left behind, somehow missing, like
an amputated leg or arm that continues sending out sensations to the
brain, even though it’s gone? Just the other day my mother said to
me, "you know, when you are born in a country, there is a part of you
that always feels that that country is your true home."

Aztag- Do you think the recognition of these genocides should be a
prerequisite to Turkey’s accession to the EU?

Thea Halo- I don’t think that only the recognition of the Genocides
is important, I think many factors are important for Turkey’s
inclusion into the EU. But by recognizing the Genocides they would
resolve some of the other important issues as well. For instance,
journalists, publishers, and teachers are still being jailed for
talking about the Genocides. If you recognize the Genocides, then you
don’t have to keep jailing your teachers, publishers, and journalists
on this issue. As my father used to say, you kill 2 birds with one
stone. And there are other human rights issues that Turkey has to
deal with. I must tell you, when I went to Turkey I found a very
beautiful land visually, and I found the people to be exceptionally
sweet and hospitable. It’s a shame that they can’t speak freely and
learn what happened in their own country without fear.

The sad thing is that they lost so much, because the Greeks,
Armenians, and
Assyrians had so much culture there. They brought so much vibrancy to
the country that was lost. They were wonderful artisans,
intellectuals, teachers, and musicians. At the time, there were
Europeans who were saying, "What in the world will Turkey do without
the Christians?" After all, it was the Christians who were the
intellectuals and business people, who had the education to help
Turkey progress into the 20th century. When Turkey got rid of the
Christian populations, they set themselves back, way-way back. The
general Turkish population was not well educated at that time,
because the Turkish government didn’t bother to educate them the way
the Christian missionaries educated the Christian populations. For
the most part, the government wouldn’t allow Muslims to attend the
Christian schools, for fear of conversion, so most Turks of the time
remained peasants and farmers. Consequently, the Turks did themselves
a great disservice, because the removal of the Armenians, Greeks, and
Assyrians left a great vacuum in Turkey.

Aztag- What was the impact of your book? To what extent did it help
raise greater awareness about the genocides of the Pontic Greeks, the
Assyrians, and the Armenians?

Thea halo- One of the first emails I got when the book was published
was from a young Pontic Greek girl living in Holland. She said, the
Pontic Greeks lived in Asia Minor for 3 thousand years and I go to
school and no one in Holland knows we ever existed. It really touched
my heart. I knew what she was talking about because no one knew that
we exist in New York. So, of course, it makes a difference. They
could then start to teach this history in schools. My book was picked
up by UCLA and they began to teach high school teachers how to teach
Not Even My Name to their students.

Aztag- "Not Even My Name" is already translated to Greek and Dutch.
Are there any plans to translate it to other languages, including
Armenian?

Thea Halo- I think it would be important and I would love to see `Not
Even
My Name’ translated into Armenian. A Turkish publisher also wanted to
publish it and an Icelandic publisher recently contacted me for the
rights.

Aztag- You are one of the very few who are speaking out about the
Genocides of the Pontic Greeks and Assyrians; with this comes great
responsibility. A Scholar or an author, who deals with the Holocaust
or the Armenian genocide for instance, might be under less pressure,
because there are many others in the field. How do you deal with this
pressure?

Thea Halo- I do feel very responsible and when I’m asked to give a
lecture, I do feel
I should go, but I also enjoy going out there. I usually bring my
mother with me. She loves doing this because it’s something very
important to her. It’s nice to see her with some of the older people
who have lived through this. They hug and kiss each other; because my
mother’s memory helped put this history on the map. She became a very
important person and a symbol, and she feels this importance. There’s
an immediate connection between them when they meet, even with the
younger generations, that’s just so wonderful to see. One young
Pontic Greek girl in one of our audiences in New York stood up and
said to my mother, "you are our history; our history alive." It was
very moving. So I do enjoy doing this, but I also feel a great
responsibility, and will continue to feel that way, until there is
proper recognition of the Genocide of the Pontic Greeks and
Assyrians.

Aztag- What about your mother? She is very much involved in this as
well, isn’t she?

Thea Halo- My mother is 94. I was amazed the first time we had a
radio interview on NPR. My mom was on the phone and I was in the
studio in Boston. During the interview she laughed and she cried.
Then I found Lisa Mullin’s website on the internet for "The World."
Mullins said her favorite interviewees were Thea and Sano Halo. I was
surprised, but I could understand why. My mother was perfect. Her
answers were very sweet and natural. When I read the passage from the
book about her mother giving her away to save her, my mother began to
cry. She had to take a moment to collect herself. Then she said she
never saw her mother again. Soon after she told a funny story about
how people would ask her husband if she was his daughter, and then
she laughed. She had a natural instinct not to allow the interview to
become morbid. When I asked her about it later she said, "a little
bit of laughter and a little bit of tears." I again realized how much
there was about her I didn’t know. She always loved to sing, and when
we go on our events, she sings old Greek and Turkish songs for the
audience that she learned as a child. She even sings an old Armenian
love song she learned when living with Zohra and Hagop.

Aztag- During a lecture, speaking about your book you said, `The
story is my mother’s but the sunsets are mine.’ Can you elaborate on
this?

Thea Halo- Well, of course she doesn’t remember when the sun came up
and when the sun went down, when it was raining, etc. But I wanted to
help people be there, really experience the story. All the facts are
hers; the story of the village, what happened to the people, the
couple who ran away and married, that’s all true. But the part where
they stare into the puddle of water as they stand before their
parents, of course, that’s part of the things I added to help the
reader enter the story. From what people tell me, it does help them
be there. They feel they were actually walking with my mother on that
harrowing death march to exile.

Aztag- Any plans for another book?

Thea Halo- I do think of many other books. The book that I would like
to write is a collection of interviews with people who have
experienced Genocide, because in that way we will see how similar the
suffering really is. Maybe in this way some of the tribalism will be
put away. But it’s impossible to get rid of all the tribalism.
Unfortunately, Genocide has become big business. It’s not simply a
moral issue anymore, and this is what I find the most objectionable.
Some Armenians have told me that certain survivors have passed away
but they have already been interviewed, and they’ll turn over the
tapes to me. Same goes for Assyrians and Pontic Greeks. So I am
hoping that for the ones I can’t interview directly, I can at least
access the tapes of their interviews.

I guess my focus in life has always been both the beauty of the world
and the injustices. I think that those two things often go together.
If you look at the various cultures that once inhabited Turkey, for
instance, they are all unique and very beautiful. They created great
works of art and architecture and they developed communities that
allowed them to survive and prosper for thousands of years, at least
in the periods when they weren’t being slaughtered and oppressed. And
that’s why I wrote the book the way I did. I wanted to show the
beauty of the Pontic Greek culture, at least in these three villages,
and what they actually lost. Because only by seeing the beauty of
what was, can you more fully understand the tragedy and injustice of
what has been taken away.

No right to lose?

What the Papers Say (Russia)
February 22, 2008 Friday

NO RIGHT TO LOSE?

by Boris Navasardjan

HIGHLIGHT: SERJ SARKISJAN IS ABOUT TO BECOME PRESIDENT, LEVON
TER-PETROSJAN PROMISES "SURPRISES"; Whatever Ter-Petrosjan is
planning, his time has nearly run out.

Everybody in Armenia wondered before the election on January 19 to
what extent the correlation of forces and interests that had taken
shape under Robert Kocharjan would be spared changes.

These doubts and apprehensions played their part, and the outcome of
the election was never a foregone conclusion. Levon Ter-Petrosjan’s
participation in the election became a wild card in the deck. A
substantial part of the establishment views Ter-Petrosjan, the first
president of sovereign Armenia, as a man they know and a man who
could be trusted to do right (or at least not to do wrong). These
people made fortunes and gained political weight in Ter-Petrosjan’s
days. He posed a threat only to a narrow circle of players directly
involved in his confrontation with Kocharjan-Sarkisjan duo on the
side of the latter. As far as practically all of the elite was
concerned, Ter-Petrosjan was all right.

As a matter of fact, Ter-Petrosjan knew that he should rely on the
resources the authorities themselves would be relying on –
bureaucracy, oligarchs, and security structures. His whole
presidential campaign was arranged in such a manner as to convince
these people that he posed no threats to them. It seems that
Ter-Petrosjan succeeded. Cracks began developing in the previously
monolithic support of the regime. These cracks would have been made
even deeper and more serious by the second round. That was why
whether or not Sarkisjan would win in the very first round was the
central intrigue of the election. Establishment abhors surprises by
definition. Being thoroughly conservative, it was supposed to vote
Sarkisjan just because of that.

(Attempts were made to present Sarkisjan and Ter-Petrosjan as
pro-Russian and pro-Western politicians. They failed. It was analysts
in nearby Azerbaijan and Georgia that succumbed to the temptation to
present the situation as crucial for Moscow’s clout with the South
Caucasus. It became clear to everyone in practically no time at all
that both candidates, pragmatics as they were, would keep up
Kocharjan’s foreign policy.

Ter-Petrosjan meant business (i.e. was determined to beat Sarkisjan).
He tapped every available resource, pulled every string, and called
in all debts. Ter-Petrosjan’s campaign had more than enough sponsors
– wealthy people prepared to back the erstwhile president. Even some
political parties backed Ter-Petrosjan. Last but not the least, he
rallied the so called protest electorate.

What Ter-Petrosjan is going to do now is anybody’s guess. He has
already said he wanted the outcome invalidated as rigged and another
election organized. In any event, Ter-Petrosjan is running out of
time. He must spring whatever surprises he has prepared soon or it
will be too late. Protest rallies have a tendency to wind down when
protesters do not see any specific steps taken. Some observers
therefore anticipate attempts to seize government buildings or even
foment a civil war. On the other hand, situation in CIS countries is
not what it used to be 3-4 years ago. The authorities are less
tentative and mobs less reckless, as proved by the recent
developments in Georgia. Ter-Petrosjan is surely aware of it. Does it
mean that he has something altogether different in mind?

Source: Nezavisimaya Gazeta, No 35, February 22, 2008, p. 3

BAKU: 6 high-ranking MFA officials announced support to Ter-Petrosya

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Feb. 25, 2008

6 high-ranking MFA officials announced support to Ter-Petrosyan

[ 25 Feb 2008 16:02 ]

Yerevan-APA. Armenian Central Election Commission announced the
results of presidential elctions which was held on February 19, APA
reports quoting `Novosti-Armenia’

Armenian Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisyan has won February 19
presidential elections, the country’s central elect ion commission
announced giving final election results.
`Sarkisyan gained 52,82% votes, ` Garegin Azaryan , the head of
Armenian central elction commission, said.
His nearest rivals, Levon Ter-Petrosyan and Artur Bagdasaryan
received 21, 5% and 17, 7% votes.6 members of CEC have signed the
final protocol.2 opposition members of CEC have not attended the
meeting. Armenian presidential hopeful, ex-President Levon
Ter-Petrosyan appealed to the Constitutional Court `to recognize as
insuperable the obstacles, which arose on the way of his
participation in the February 19 elections.’
Ter-Petrosyan’s election headquarters of `unsuccessfully took up all
the possible measures, provided for by the electoral legislation, to
prevent violations of the law against the candidate or to eliminate
their consequences’.Today Levon Ter-Petrosyan announced that RA MFA
head of department of information division Vladimir Karapetian, head
of UN division of international organizations department Varsenik
Baghdasarian, head of U.S. and Canada division of American department
Karine Afrikian, head of NATO division of arms control and
international security department
Marta Ayvazian, European department advisor Arakel Semerjian , second
secretary of Latin America division of American department Elen
Movsisian.

BAKU: Presidency of Serj Sarkisyan will not Change NK Process

Trend News Agency, Azerbaijan
Feb 21 2008

Presidency of Serj Sarkisyan will not Change Nagorno-Karabakh
Process: Institute of CIS Countries
21.02.08 10:45

Russia, Moscow, 20 February / corr. Trend News R. Agayev/ The
presidency of Serj Sarkisyan, in Armenia, will change nothing in the
process of regulation of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. `There is no
need to expect any revolutionary changes regarding the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, after taking into account the biography
and views of the future president’, Vladimir Jarikin, the Russian
analyst of high rank said.

The former prime minister and the chairman of the Republican Party of
Armenia -Serj Sarkisyan gained 52.86% of votes in the presidential
elections, held on 19 February.

`It will be an exaggeration to say that the results of the
presidential elections in Armenia are unexpected. The outcomes were
predictable, however the Government wanted to gain more than 53% of
the votes,’ Jairkin, the deputy director of the Institute of CIS
(Commonwealth of Independent States) countries said in his interview
with Trend News on 20 February.

According to expert, the supporters of Lev Ter-Petrasyan, the
opposition candidate, would not calm down and will demand the
re-counting of the votes once again. However, the outcome of the
elections is convincing enough, because Ter-Petrasyan gained not many
votes, less than 50%, therefore it will be difficult for his
supporters to speak about his victory.

The contradicting opinions of the analysts concerning democratic
elections in Armenia will not destabilize the situation in the
country. The only stabilizing factor not to hold an active policy of
colour revolution with regard to Armenia is the very influential and
strong Armenian Diaspora in the United States, he said.

The analyst did not comment on whether Robert Kocharyan will be the
Prime Minister and said that the former president will still be
included in the government of Armenia, but now it is difficult to say
which position he will hold.

Jarikin said that there will be no changes in Armenia-Russia
relations and the course pursued during the period of the later
president will be continued.

Sumgayit Was The First Step Towards Militarization Of The Karabakh I

SUMGAYIT WAS THE FIRST STEP TOWARDS MILITARIZATION OF THE KARABAKH ISSUE

armradio.am
25.02.2008 16:03

On February 25 RA Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian participated in the
opening of the international conference on "Tolerance and Xenophobia
in the South Caucasian region." The conference is dedicated to the 20th
anniversary of the Armenian massacres in Sumgayit in February, 1988.

Addressing the participants, Minister Oskanian expressed gratitude
to the organizers of the conference for the initiative. The Minister
suggested considering the topic in three layers: Armenia, the region
as a whole and the global level.

Speaking about the events in Sumgayit and the consequences,
the Minister noted that Sumgayit was the first step towards the
militarization of the Karabakh issue and the attest to solve the
conflict via force.

Minister Oskanian also turned to the presidential elections of February
19, stressing the importance of tolerance and unity in ensuring the
stability and development in the country.

Presidnet Of The European People’s Party Congratulates Serge Sargsya

PRESIDNET OF THE EUROPEAN PEOPLE’S PARTY CONGRATULATES SERGE SARGSYAN

armradio.am
25.02.2008 17:25

Wilfried Martens, the President of the European People’s Party,
congratulated Serge Sargsyan on his victory in the presidential
elections.

The message says, in part:

"It’s a great pleasure to congratulate you for being elected to the
post of the President of the Republic of Armenia on behalf of the
European People’s Party and myself.

I’m sure that your election will become a new impetus for the political
path Armenia has chosen, which is targeted at ensuring a proper place
in democratic Europe.

Although there are many problems to be solved in the future, we are
confident that with your convictions, fairness and resoluteness you
will be an ideal leader for your country and all its citizens."