Aras Ozbilis Held His First Training In Kuban

ARAS OZBILIS HELD HIS FIRST TRAINING IN KUBAN

ARMENPRESS
9 August, 2012
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, AUGUST 9, ARMENPRESS: Midfielder of Armenian National football
team Aras Ozbilis held his first training in ~SKuban~T Krasnodar.

Armenpress reports calling the official website of the club that
Ozbilis has signed a contract for 4 years with Russian team. After
his first training with new teammates former player of ~SAjax~T shared
with his first emotions.

~SIt is a wonderful club and the stadium is very beautiful. Unlike
Dutch football here is paid more attention at physics. It is very good
that during the matches the stadium is almost full~T mentioned Ozbilis.

Aras Özbiliz is a product of the Ajax youth academy. Prior to moving to
Ajax as a youth, he played for HVV Hollandia in his home town of Hoom,
where he grew up. At the age of 8 he participated in tryouts for the
Amsterdam side, and was chosen to play for Ajax, having represented
Ajax on every stage of the youth academy, before making his debut
for the A selection in 2010 under then coach Martin Jol.

The Mystery Of Competitive Caucasus Elections

THE MYSTERY OF COMPETITIVE CAUCASUS ELECTIONS
By Thomas de Waal

hetq 16:43, August 9, 2012

(The following opinion piece appeared in the August 9, 2012 edition
of The National Interest)

A curious election took place recently in the Caucasus. It attracted
very little notice but deserved more. In the tiny, unrecognized
territory of Nagorny Karabakh-entirely Armenian but still regarded
by the world as de jure part of Azerbaijan-an opposition candidate
for president did extremely well.

With no support from any political party and in a place with a
strong tradition of government control, Vitaly Balasanian collected
32 percent of the vote against the incumbent Bako Saakian, who was
reelected president. According to local statistics, about seventy
thousand people voted. Balasanian’s was an impressive performance
by any standards. In most of the former Soviet Union, opposition
candidates do not get a third of the vote. The result was even more
striking in the limited conditions of Nagorny Karabakh. In Armenia’s
last-disputed-presidential election, former president and head of
the opposition Levon Ter-Petrosian was awarded 21 percent of the
vote. The Armenian opposition may now take heart ahead of the next
presidential election there, due in February 2013.

This was not an election fought primarily over foreign or security
policy. There was consensus on the issue of Nagorny Karabakh’s status,
with both main candidates maintaining that the territory should be
an independent state, separate from Azerbaijan. Having been a leading
military commander in the conflict of 1991-1994, Balasanian’s patriotic
credentials were unimpeachable, and he actually took a harder-line
position than his rival: he said that Karabakh should insist on being
represented at the negotiating table and unequivocally rejected the
return of the occupied territories around Karabakh to Azerbaijan
(a central part of the peace deal currently on the table, accepted
by Yerevan).

The differences were over domestic policy, with the discontent of
voters perhaps more directed against the controversial prime minister,
Arayik Harutyunyan, than against the president. The opposition
candidate picked up his strongest support in three rural regions,
Askeran, Martakert and Martuni, where socio-economic problems are
greatest.

The Karabakh election conforms to a curious trend whereby some of the
most competitive elections in the post-Soviet space are in unrecognized
or partially recognized territories.

Separatist Transnistria recently chose as its new leader a young
parliamentarian Yevgeny Shevchuk, who defeated the candidates more
favored by the old guard and by Moscow. Abkhazia has had two fiercely
competitive elections in 2004 and 2011, in which the candidate
positioning himself as the outsider prevailed both times. Even
South Ossetia, whose current population is estimated at no more than
forty thousand and whose budget is 99 percent supported by Russia,
managed to hold a dramatic semifarcical election last year in which
the opposition candidate, Alla Jiyoeva, won. The results of that
ballot were then annulled, but the eventual winner, Leonid Tibilov,
was by local standards a fairly independent candidate who has appointed
Jiyoeva to his cabinet.

What is going on here? If I have an explanation it is that,
paradoxically, because statehood is weaker in these territories,
ordinary members of society are more self-reliant and less susceptible
to pressure. There is more politics from below. But I would use the
word “competitive” advisedly. These are not regular elections. There
is a democratic deficit in part because these territories are not
recognized sovereign states (although this should not disqualify them
from having democratic aspirations.)

More problematic is the issue of the “missing populations,” Azerbaijani
and Georgian, that cannot take part in the vote because they were
displaced by war. In the last Soviet census of 1988, 23 percent of
the population of Nagorny Karabakh was Azerbaijani. All of those
people are now refugees inside their own country.

What is a proper international verdict on a poll like such as one?

International observers continue to tie themselves in knots, satisfying
neither the Armenian side (“Why do you ignore us if we hold a good
democratic election?”) nor the Azerbaijanis (“Don’t give any credence
to a territory that no one, not even Armenia, has recognized as
sovereign.”) Freedom House has begun to give democracy ratings to
the breakaway territories but has almost no direct presence on the
ground to make its judgment.

At the very least, there is a political judgment that the citizens
of these lands have a crucial stake in the eventual peace settlements
of the conflicts and that it is desirable for them to have legitimate
leaders who can speak on their behalf.

In March 1992, making plans for a peace conference on the Karabakh
conflict (that has still not been held twenty years on), the then
Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, now the OSCE,
first tried to square this circle by stating that “elected and other
representatives of Nagorno-Karabakh [ie Armenians and Azerbaijanis
respectively] will be invited to the Conference.”

The current OSCE mediators did their best to continue this line in
their latest statement, saying “The Co-Chairs acknowledge the need
for the de facto authorities in NK to try to organize democratically
the public life of their population with such a procedure. However,
the Co-Chairs note that none of their three countries, nor any other
country, recognizes Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent and sovereign
state.”

Along the same lines, the EU foreign policy chief Baroness Ashton
issued a statement, criticizing the basis for the election but not the
election itself: “I would like to reiterate that the European Union
does not recognise the constitutional and legal framework in which they
will be held. These ‘elections’ should not prejudice the determination
of the future status of Nagorno-Karabakh in the negotiated general
framework of the peaceful settlement of the conflict.”

The rather tortured language of these statements reflects an underlying
discomfort. The longer these protracted post-Soviet conflicts remain
unresolved, these elections pose an international challenge which is
growing, not diminishing.

Thomas de Waal is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace.

Armenian Language Gains Status Of Regional Language In Ukraine

ARMENIAN LANGUAGE GAINS STATUS OF REGIONAL LANGUAGE IN UKRAINE

arminfo
Thursday, August 9, 14:35

New law on basic principles of the state language policy has come
into force in Ukraine. As a result, the Armenian language has gained
the status of a regional language in that country, alongside with
Russian, Byelorussian, Bulgarian, and Moldavian.

The Armenian language can be used equally with the state language in
the regions of Ukraine were Armenian is a native language for at least
10% of the population.

The law aroused wide public response in Ukraine.

USA : Hurlements Du Chien Rouge Vs Hurlements Turcs

USA : HURLEMENTS DU CHIEN ROUGE VS HURLEMENTS TURCS

Publie le : 08-08-2012

Info Collectif VAN – – ” Une pièce armenienne qui
doit etre jouee a New York en septembre, a declenche une reaction
violente de la communaute turque aux Etats-Unis, a rapporte le journal
Milliyet. La pièce intitulee Les hurlements du chien rouge raconte
l’histoire d’un Armenien decouvrant les evenements de 1915, par le
biais de lettres des membres de sa famille, tues pendant les
incidents. ” On notera l’utilisation du terme ‘incidents’ et la
liaison faite avec 2015, qui marquera les 100 ans du genocide. Les
Turcs ont-ils peur de 2015 ? Le Collectif VAN vous livre la traduction
d’un article en anglais paru sur le site turc Hurriyet Daily News le 8
août 2012.

Legende photo : L’affiche de la pièce. Photo Milliyet

Hurriyet Daily News

Une pièce de theâtre armenienne enrage la communaute turque aux USA

ISTANBUL

Une pièce armenienne qui doit etre jouee a New York en septembre, a
declenche une reaction violente de la communaute turque aux
Etats-Unis, a rapporte le journal Milliyet.

La pièce intitulee Les hurlements du chien rouge raconte l’histoire
d’un Armenien decouvrant les evenements de 1915, par le biais de
lettres des membres de sa famille, tues pendant les incidents.

La pièce decrit la mort des membres de la famille, ainsi que celle de
bien d’autres familles armeniennes, par les forces ottomanes.

La communaute turque des Etats-Unis a reagi violemment a la pièce. Ali
Cinar, le responsable de l’Association Turque Americaine, a declare
qu’ils s’attendaient a ce que l’anniversaire des 100 ans de 1915,
genère des actes similaires de la part du lobby armenien aux
Etats-Unis.

” Le but de cette pièce n’est pas de faire l’art “, a dit Cinar. ” Le
but ici est tout simplement de repeter les revendications de 1915. Il
aspire a propager et a creer de pretendues histoires, a partir de
lettres et de souvenirs, qui ont l’air d’etre des evenements reels. ”

8/8/2012

©Traduction de l’anglais C.Gardon pour le Collectif VAN – 8 août 2012
– 09:00 –

Retour a la rubrique

Source/Lien : Hurriyet Daily News

http://www.collectifvan.org/article.php?r=0&id=66257
www.collectifvan.org
www.collectifvan.org

I Am Talking To The Wise People

I am talking to the wise people
by Nahid Hattar

Al-Arab al-Yawm
Aug 8 2012
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

The United States is playing an immoral double game towards the Syrian
affair. This is because it knows only too well that the road to direct
military intervention in Syria is blocked by new international balances
with Russia and China and the countries that oppose such action. This
means that the chances of bringing down the Syrian regime by force
are slim in view of the following:

1. The overwhelming superiority of the Syrian Arab Army over the
armed resistance.

2. The economic assistance that the Russians and Iranians give to
Damascus.

3. The political support for President Bashar al-Asad from at least
50 per cent of the Syrians.

4. The opposition is divided and is being courted by the different
capitals and intelligence agencies and the main weight of this
resistance has moved into the hands of the fundamentalist, takfiri
and terrorist groups.

Yet, the United States does not cease to spread the illusions about the
possibility of the fall of the Syrian regime through the “available
means.” It encourages the armed elements, including the terrorist
elements, extends political, financial and intelligence support for
them and provides the cover for Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to
arm and fund them. It is doing this in the hope of “the miracle”
and the fall of the hostile regime through the terrorist operations
accompanied by political and media incitement and defections.

This is merely hope and not a goal and Washington has admitted that it
knows little about Syria and this does not allow it to form a practical
and realistic vision for the future. Despite that, the Americans have
practical and realistic objectives in Syria represented by prolonging
the drain of the country, destroying its infrastructure and economy,
exhausting the capabilities of the army and society and taming the
Syrians to accept US hegemony and peace with Israel.

It is these objectives that explain the large number of terrorist
operations that do not aim to weaken the regime but the capabilities
of the state and army, including the blowing up of infrastructures,
railway lines, bridges, gas, oil and water pipes, electricity
transmission lines and public facilities, as well as the assassination
of scientific, military and technical cadres. For example, what kind
of a political objective would be behind the assassination of the
director of the Syrian missile project? It was recently confirmed
through monitoring contacts between US officers and officers from
Free Syrian Army that those targeting operations were planned by
the Americans.

The ongoing quibbling over Syria is no longer meaningful because
the picture has become bare and clearer. We are now witnessing a
confrontation between the Syrian army and the armed groups in all
their colours. It is the weapons that talk today and not discussions,
demonstrations or political and media frenzy. It is the outcome of the
war in the field that will politically settle the situation. For the
Americans, it would be a comprehensive victory if the regime fell, and
there would be nothing to prevent them from negotiating with Damascus
when it settles the situation militarily. In the first scenario, the
Gulf States would find themselves behind the American master and in
the second scenario they would pay the terrible revenge price.

Turkey would be the biggest loser in the Syrian crisis regardless
of its come. Turkey today has its lost its regional standing and has
become entangled in animosities with Syria, Iraq, Iran and Russia.

However, its biggest loss is represented in the dramatic eruption of
the Turkish-Kurdish issue and the secession of the Kurdish region that
encompasses 20 million people is about to be a topic on the agenda.

Damascus dealt a strategic blow to Ankara when it recognized the
Syrian Kurdish cause and armed the Kurdistan Workers Party fighters
who are now seeking to liberate a buffer zone inside Turkey that would
be tantamount to a base to liberate the entire Kurdish region. The
unified Kurdish state is looming on the horizon and this would mean
opening the file of Iskandarun and the Arabs, Alawites and Armenians
in Turkey. The Turkish adventure in Syria has burned the fingers of
a major regional country the size of Turkey. What do you think would
happen to Jordan?

We are not talking only about the weak capabilities but about
realistic elements for the alternative homeland project, which could
come together and combine and create a qualitative step that would
soon move, God forbid, to a state of chaos whose possibilities would
interact with several shocking indicators.

[Translated from Arabic]

Book Review: Genocide Center Of Novel

GENOCIDE CENTER OF NOVEL

Sarasota Herald Tribune (Florida)
August 5, 2012 Sunday

by Susan Rife

A look at the comments section underneath a review of Chris Bohjalian’s
new novel, “The Sandcastle Girls,” in the Washington Post makes it
quite clear that the controversy over the nearly 100-year-old Armenian
genocide is far from over.

The neutral terminology would be the “Turkish-Armenian conflict,”
suggests one writer.

But for Bohjalian, there’s no question as to who were the losers in
the Ottoman Empire in early World War I.

His new novel, “The Sandcastle Girls,” draws on his grandparents’
experiences in Turkey and Syria in 1915, and it is a story both
excruciating and exhilarating.

The novel shuttles back and forth between modern-day Laura Petrosian,
a 40-something writer of women’s fiction, and 1915 Aleppo, Syria,
where Laura’s grandparents met and fell in love.

Elizabeth Endicott is newly graduated from Mount Holyoke College,
speaks a bit of Turkish and Armenian and has taken a crash course in
nursing when she and her father head to Aleppo from Boston as part of
a humanitarian mission to deliver food and medical aid to Armenian
refugees, who turn out be be entirely women and children who have
been marched across the desert to “relocation camps.” The men are
nearly entirely gone.

The Endicotts’ first exposure to the refugees is stunningly graphic.

As they walk to the central courtyard of Aleppo, they encounter a
“staggering column” of hundreds of naked women and children that
Elizabeth first takes to be Africans, so blackened are they by
the sun. They have been herded across the desert for weeks; the
atrocities committed against them are described in grim detail by
Bohjalian: Group beheadings treated like sport by sword-wielding
Turkish soldiers on horseback; women impaled on spikes like some sort
of obscene desert plant.

In tending to the needs of the refugees, Elizabeth befriends one of
their number, Nevart, and the 8-year-old orphan she is protecting,
Hatoun, who has not spoken a word since witnessing her mother’s
decapitation.

And then Elizabeth meets Armen, an engineer working with
German troops. Armen has lost his wife and infant daughter in the
catastrophe. When he and Elizabeth begin to fall in love, Armen leaves
Syria to join British forces elsewhere in the Middle East.

Bohjalian alternates the horrors of the genocide with the love story
between Elizabeth and Armen, and then shifts to the story of Laura
Petrosian’s digging into her grandparents’ pasts.

When a friend calls to tell her that a photograph of Petrosian’s
grandmother is on display in Boston, she is startled to find an image
not of her grandmother, but of another woman who shares Laura’s name.

Who is she, and how did her image come to be part of the collection?

What secrets did Armen and Elizabeth bring to the United States?

“The Sandcastle Girls” is Bohjalian’s 14th novel, and he’s at the
top of his game with this deeply personal story. The narration by
Cassandra Campbell and Alison Fraser is spot-on, with Laura given
a breezy, 21st-century first-person tone and Elizabeth and Armen’s
story told in the third person, presented in a somber, riveting style.

Two Survivors Share Horror And Hope

TWO SURVIVORS SHARE HORROR AND HOPE
by: Tomi Obaro

The Washington Post
August 6, 2012 Monday
Suburban Edition

At first glance, Freddy Mutanguha and Margit Meissner couldn’t be
more different.

Mutanguha, 36, is tall and black, with a round face, high cheekbones
and quiet voice. Meissner, 90, is short and white, with a beak-shaped
nose and a frank, disarming manner.

But they both work in museums. They both have Facebook profiles.

And they are both genocide survivors.

Meissner was 16 years old when she fled Czechoslovakia for France,
just as the Nazis were annexing Austria. Mutanguha was 18 when he
fled Rwanda’s western province for the southern part of the country,
leaving behind two dead parents and four dead sisters.

Meissner, a volunteer at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
lives in Bethesda.

Mutanguha, director of the Kigali Genocide Memorial, lives in Rwanda.

And this weekend, they both were in Washington, where Meissner gave
Mutanguha a tour of the Holocaust Museum – and they both reflected
on their mutual hope that educating people about genocides that have
already occurred might prevent others.

The two survivors first met in June when Meissner visited the Kigali
Genocide Memorial as part of a trip she was taking with Women for
Women International, an organization that teaches women in eight
war-torn countries basic economic skills. Meissner sponsors a young
Rwandan woman as part of the program, but because Women for Women
International’s relationship with the Kigali Genocide Memorial was
so informal, Mutanguha didn’t even know about Meissner’s visit.

“When [a colleague] said, ‘Did you know there was a Holocaust survivor
that came to the memorial,’ I said . . . ‘It’s not possible,’ââ~B”
exclaimed Mutanguha.

The two finally met for breakfast, on the last day of Meissner’s trip.

“We became friends; we get along very well,” Mutanguha says.

Meissner convinced Mutanguha to come to Washington.

On his way to a conference in Los Angeles on preventing genocide,
Mutanguha spent 24 hours in Washington with support from Women for
Women International and a bed for the night in Meissner’s home.

Meissner has been a museum guide for the past six years. She spent
30 years working in special education administration in Montgomery
County. It was only after writing her memoirs – encouraged by her
children – that she realized the significance of her story.

“As a survivor, I realized I was in a unique position. There are
thousands of people who could do [special education advocacy], but
there are not a lot of Holocaust survivors left.”

Mutanguha got involved in genocide prevention work as a volunteer with
a student association at his university. He helped gather testimony
and photographs from thousands of survivors of the 1994 slaughter,
which left an estimated 800,000 Rwandans dead. After graduating with a
degree in biography and geography, Mutanguha was offered a volunteer
job with Aegis Trust, a genocide prevention organization that was
tapped to create a memorial museum in Kigali. In 2006, Mutanguha was
offered the post of director of the Kigali Genocide Memorial.

“If you want to understand what happened and you don’t listen
to survivors, you will never have full, relevant information,”
Mutanguha says.

Their shared interest in survivor testimonies is clear as Meissner
takes Mutanguha through the Holocaust Museum. Mutanguha watches a
screening in the “From Memory to Action” installation, waiting for
a taped interview with Carl Wilkens, a humanitarian aid worker who
was one of the few Americans to stay in Rwanda when the genocide
took place.

After the tour, Mutanguha and Meissner share their thoughts. Mutanguha
is gentle with his praise, while Meissner isn’t afraid to disagree. He
appreciates the way the museum touches on other genocides in the world,
but Meissner disagrees.

“[The Holocaust Museum] doesn’t have anything about Armenia. The main
exhibit is only about the Jews, so I was very impressed with the
[Kigali Genocide Memorial]. You talk about the Holocaust, you talk
about Bosnia, you talk about Armenia, you talk about Cambodia. This
museum doesn’t talk about Cambodia at all,” Meissner says.

Some of their opinions seem to reflect generational differences:
“The messages on the table, this is good,” Mutanguha says about an
exhibit in “From Memory to Action” that lights up with information
when touched.

“I don’t know that it is good.” says Meissner, as Mutanguha laughs.

Meissner continues, “I personally think that it is a distraction.”

What emerges most is the emotional bond that quickly developed between
two people who have shared atrocity.

“Margaret . . .” Mutanguha begins.

“Margit!” Meissner interrupts him.

“Margarit, sorry my English . . . ”

They laugh.

“Margit is like a mother to us,” Mutanguha continues.

The shared pain of their past has left Mutanguha and Meissner keenly
aware of the ways in which the world has failed to prevent other
genocides. But Mutanguha is cautiously optimistic about the impact
this museum and others like it could have.

“This memorial in Washington, it’s very well done,” he says. “It covers
everything we need to know about. So let’s see what the world will do.”

Russia Sees Settlement Within OSCE Minsk Group

RUSSIA SEES SETTLEMENT WITHIN OSCE MINSK GROUP

Mediamax
Aug 8 2012
Armenia

Yerevan/Mediamax/. Russia thinks efforts toward settlement of Karabakh
conflict should be focused on OSCE Minsk Group as before.

Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Grigory Karasin said this speaking on
“Golos Russia” radio station, Mediamax reports.

“Armenia and Azerbaijan are our close partners within CIS. We value
our relations both with Yerevan and Baku and do our best fairly and
honestly to bring the positions of both sides on Nagorno Karabakh
together. It’s an extremely difficult and complex topic which has
its roots and its history. I think we should focus our efforts on the
Minsk Group as before. There is Minsk Group comprising Co-Chairs and
representatives of France, United States, Russia, OSCE representatives
which work very conscientiously: they travel to the region, meet with
Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders, help them find acceptable wording
for future documents. We support this activity in every possible
way and expect it to yield a definite result in the nearest future”,
said the Russian diplomat.

He noted that electoral cycles in Armenia and Azerbaijan affect the
settlement process but he expressed the hope that “we may begin to
move forward in 2012-2013”.

Russian And Armenian Presidents Meet

RUSSIAN AND ARMENIAN PRESIDENTS MEET

Vestnik Kavkaza
Aug 8 2012
Russia

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan is on a visit to Moscow where
he met Russian President Vladimir Putin and discussed key issues
of bilateral cooperation. Putin thanked Sargsyan for the positive
investment climate for Russian business. They decided to organize
a Russian-Armenian intergovernmental commission in autumn 2012 for
economic cooperation until 2020, RIA Novosti reports.

Russian-Armenian trade turnover reached $1 billion in 2011 and
increased by 32% in Q1 2012. Armenians working in Russia bring about
$1 billion back to Armenia every year. Sargsyan expressed hope for
doubling or tripling trade turnover in the next 2-3 years.

Gazprom (Russia) and the Armenian Ministry for Energy and Natural
Resources are rumoured to be negotiating adjustments to gas prices.

Gazprom is expected to increase gas prices from $180 per 1000 cubic
meters today to $280 on October 1 and $320 on January 1, 2013.

Armenian Minister for Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisyan
confirmed the negotiations without giving details. Higher gas prices
may cause public discontent in the light of the presidential polls
of 2013.

Yerevan is in need of loans, because the EU postponed the consideration
of the issue. Aykakan Zhamanak said that Armenia is having unofficial
negotiations with Russia to receive a loan of $0.8-1 billion.

105 Passengers To Arrive In Armenia From Aleppo Today

105 PASSENGERS TO ARRIVE IN ARMENIA FROM ALEPPO TODAY

Panorama.am
08/08/2012

Armavia Air Company will operate Yerevan-Aleppo-Yerevan additional
flight today, August 8. According to preliminary information, 105
passengers will arrive in Armenia on Armavia plane, the air company
told Panorama.am.

Beginning August 9, Armavia, jointly with the Armenian government,
will operate flights to transport Syrian-Armenian children to Armenia.

The flights will be implemented as part of Armenian Diaspora Ministry’s
program.

>From August 9, Armavia will operate Yerevan-Damascus-Yerevan and
Yerevan-Aleppo-Yerevan special flights.