Chess: Armenia On Track For New Olympic Success

CHESS: ARMENIA ON TRACK FOR NEW OLYMPIC SUCCESS

News | 03.09.12 | 11:42

Team Armenia, the winner of two chess Olympiads in 2006 and 2008,
is in the middle of another effort to assure its world supremacy at
the biannual event in Istanbul, Turkey.

After five rounds of the World Chess Olympiad the team (consisting
of GMs Levon Aronian, Sergei Movsesian, Vladimir Akopian, Gabriel
Sargissian and Tigran Petrosian) is in the lead with five wins in as
many matches. The strong team of Ukraine was the latest to be beaten
by Armenia. The other teams defeated by Armenia at the current Olympiad
include Bolivia, Bangladesh, Spain and the Philippines.

Meanwhile, the women’s chess team of Armenia is currently in 32nd
place among 126 teams after three victories and two defeats in the
Olympiad so far.

Play continues today. The 11-round tournament ends on September 9. For
more information and results visit:

Meanwhile, the European Youth Chess Championship held in Prague in
late August proved the continuity of chess traditions in Armenia
as 12-year-old Hayk Martirosyan won the title for the second time
in his career. Manuel Petrosyan, 14, and Hovhannes Gabuzyan, 18,
won silver medals in their respective age groups.

http://armenianow.com/news/39666/armenia_chess_olympiad2012
www.chessolympiadistanbul.com.

Azerbaijan May Be Expelled From UN Security Council – Expert

AZERBAIJAN MAY BE EXPELLED FROM UN SECURITY COUNCIL – EXPERT

PanARMENIAN.Net
September 3, 2012 – 17:20 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Azeri assassin Ramil Safarov’s extradition proved
Armenia needs strategic planning, Director of Regional Studies Center
(RSC) believes.

At September 3 news conference in Yerevan, political expert Richard
Giragosian shared a forecast as to possible development of events.

According to him, Azerbaijan may be expelled from UN Security Council,
with import ban on weapons to be imposed.

“Turkey’s reaction to Baku’s step proved the official Ankara’s weakness
in allowing Azerbaijan to control its international policy, as Turkey,
clearly, did not expect such actions,” the expert said.

“The international community will be sure to punish Azerbaijan,
with the country posing a threat to Armenia as well as the whole world.

Safarov’s crime is the perpetuation of 1915 Genocide,” Giragosian said.

Armenia Was Given Warning 11 Days Before Safarov Extradition – Hunga

ARMENIA WAS GIVEN WARNING 11 DAYS BEFORE SAFAROV EXTRADITION – HUNGARY’S ARMENIANS

PanARMENIAN.Net
September 3, 2012 – 18:21 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Armenian National Autonomy of Hungary issued a
letter to Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan.

As the Autonomy stressed in the letter, since the murder of Armenian
lieutenant Gurgen Margaryan in 2004, the Autonomy took every effort
to promote fair punishment for Azeri assassin Ramil Safarov.

Following the opening of Azeri embassy in Hungary, the Autonomy always
kept Armenian Diaspora Ministry as well as Austria’s Armenian embassy
aware of Azerbaijan’s anti-Armenian actions.

“We repeatedly requested Armenia’s Diaspora and Foreign Ministries to
open an embassy in Hungary in view of frequent conflicts with Azeri
side in the country. However, our requests were refused, with lack
of staff cited.”

“On August 20, 11 days before Safarov’s extradition to Azerbaijan, the
Autonomy’s deputy chair Nikoghos Hakobyan informed Armenia’s Foreign
Ministry and Austria’s Armenian embassy about extradition plans,
requesting to take steps to prevent the decision. Unfortunately,
all of our efforts proved useless,” the Autonomy said, demanding
explanation as to inactivity of the Armenian side.

“With Azeri lobby gaining the upper hand in Hungary, Armenia’s
diplomatic involvement in the issue would have been crucial,” the
statement said.

Iraq Could Have Embassy In Yerevan

IRAQ COULD HAVE EMBASSY IN YEREVAN

news.am
September 03, 2012 | 15:41

YEREVAN. – Armenia’s Ambassador to Iraq, Murad Muradyan, met on August
27 with Iraqi Deputy PM Rose Nuri Shaways.

They discussed the PM’s scheduled visit to Armenia in early September,
and the cooperation domains that present a mutual interest for both
countries, Armenian MFA press service informs.

Shaways noted that he expects his visit to bring a new impetus to
the development of Armenian-Iraqi ties.

On the same day, Ambassador Muradyan also met with Iraq’s other
Deputy PM, Saleh al-Mutlaq, during which they explored the prospects
for developing the interaction between Armenia and Iraq. They also
exchanged views on Iraq’s domestic political situation and regional
matters.

On August 29, Armenia’s ambassador met with Iraqi Deputy FM Lubed
Abawi. The parties discussed the plan for opening an Iraqi embassy
in Armenia and the establishment of a bilateral legal framework.

Highly appreciating the opening of Armenia’s Embassy in Iraq, Abawi
noted that he will personally pursue the opening of an Iraqi embassy
in Armenia’s capital, Yerevan.

Azerbaïdjan: l’Arménie suspend ses relations diplomatiques avec la H

Agence France Presse
31 août 2012 vendredi 5:26 PM GMT

Azerbaïdjan: l’Arménie suspend ses relations diplomatiques avec la Hongrie

: EREVAN 31 août 2012

L’Arménie a annoncé vendredi qu’elle suspendait ses relations
diplomatiques avec la Hongrie à la suite de l’extradition par Budapest
d’un soldat azerbaïdjanais ayant décapité un officier arménien lors
d’une formation de l’Otan en 2004, soldat qui a ensuite été gracié en
Azerbaïdjan.

“Aujourd’hui, nous suspendons nos relations avec la Hongrie”, a
déclaré le président arménien, Serge Sarkissian, dans un communiqué
publié par le service de presse de la présidence.

“Par leurs actions conjointes, l’Azerbaïdjan et la Hongrie ont ouvert
la voie à ce que ces crimes se répètent. Je ne peux pas le tolérer. La
république d’Arménie ne peut pas le tolérer”, a-t-il indiqué.

Condamné à la perpétuité pour le meurtre d’un officier arménien à
Budapest en 2004, Ramil Safarov, 35 ans, a été extradé vendredi vers
son pays par les autorités hongroises et gracié aussitôt par le
président azerbaïdjanais, Ilham Aliev.

En 2004, Safarov avait décapité l’officier arménien Gourgen Margarian
dans son sommeil, lors d’une formation d’anglais organisée dans une
académie militaire à Budapest par l’Alliance atlantique pour des
soldats originaires des pays de l’ex-URSS.

Le président arménien a qualifié la décision de la Hongrie d’extrader
Safarov de “grave erreur”, soulignant qu’il s’agissait d’un “meurtre
pour des motifs ethniques”.

Par ailleurs, plusieurs Arméniens en colère ont lancé des tomates
vendredi soir sur le btiment de l’ambassade de Hongrie pour protester
contre cette extradition.

L’Arménie et l’Azerbaïdjan se disputent depuis des années le contrôle
du Nagorny Karabakh. Rattachée à l’Azerbaïdjan pendant la période
soviétique, cette région a proclamé son indépendance, non reconnue par
la communauté internationale, après une guerre qui a fait 30.000 morts
et des centaines de milliers de réfugiés entre 1988 et 1994.

Un cessez-le-feu a été signé en 1994, mais Bakou et Erevan n’arrivent
pas à se mettre d’accord sur le statut de la région.

BAKU: Hungary MFA and MoJ issue joint statement on Safarov transfer

APA, Azerbaijan
Sept 1 2012

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Justice of Hungary issued
a joint statement on the transfer of Ramil Safarov to Azerbaijan

[ 01 Sep 2012 22:28 ]

Hungarian Foreign Ministry expressed regret about the Armenia’s
decision to suspend diplomatic relations with their country

Baku. Victoria Dementyeva – APA. “Hungary acted transmission of Ramil
Safarov in accordance with the rules and in the spirit of openness.”
This was said in a joint statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
and the Ministry of Justice of Hungary, issued on September 1, APA
reports . The statement noted Hungary acted the transfer in accordance
with Strasbourg Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons of
1983.

“Hungary respects international law and international partners are
doing the same thing”, the statement said.

It is noted that Hungary regrets the decision of Armenia to suspend
the diplomatic relations with their country. “Hungary respects for
Christian Armenia, the Armenian people, their culture and traditions.”

On August 31 Ramil Safarov, who was given a life sentence by a court
in Hungary for the murder of an Armenian citizen, was transferred to
the Azerbaijan and pardoned by President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev.
In connection with this decision, Armenia announced a suspension of
diplomatic relations with Hungary.

Turkish Initiative: Bluff or Real Politics?

TURKISH INITIATIVE: BLUFF OR REAL POLITICS?

Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:56

Due to the summer vacations’ season, a kind of “dead season” has
reigned in the world of politics. But, as life in general and, in
particular, the political one cannot stand still at all, this calm is
disturbed by some political event or statement attracting certain
attention. The latter, perhaps, can include also the proposal of
Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmed Davutoglu on the organization, in
Istanbul, of negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which he made within the August 23 Summit
of the Council of Turkic-speaking States’ Cooperation held in Bishkek.

Surely, Turkey as a regional power has always played a prominent role
in the South Caucasus. Moreover, after the collapse of the Soviet
Union, which led to serious geopolitical changes and emergence of a
completely new situation, Ankara intensified its foreign policy in
order to strengthen its role as an influential regional player. Let us
remember, in particular, the initiative of Turkish Prime Minister
Erdogan on the creation of an alliance – “Platform of Stability and
Cooperation in the Caucasus”, which, as expected, in addition to
Turkey, would include Russia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia. Let’s
recall that it was launched on August 12, 2008, that is, immediately
after the military phase of the crisis in the South Caucasus caused by
the Russian-Georgian war. Frankly, it was already clear that the
Turkish initiative would be dead in its tracks, as deep confrontations
existed between the member-states of the expected alliance (between
Armenia and Azerbaijan, Russia and Georgia), which would hardly allow
enabling the peacekeeping potential of the “Platform” members. Life
has confirmed the validity of such a forecast – today, exactly four
years later, the noted initiative of Ankara has been successfully
forgotten.

How real is the realization of Ankara’s new initiative? Let’s say at
once – in search of an answer to this question it is extremely
difficult to get rid of skepticism. Here is why. Davutoglu’s proposal
cannot be taken seriously, especially because Turkey, by definition,
cannot be an impartial and objective mediator in the Karabakh
settlement process. It is Turkey that in tandem with Azerbaijan
exerted and continues to exert efforts to isolate Armenia, initiating
and implementing regional and international economic projects without
its participation. It is Turkey that still continues to blockade
Armenia and keeps close the border with it, which is qualified as an
element of military operations by international law. It is Turkey that
in the period of Azerbaijan’s armed aggression against the NKR
provided it with military-technical assistance and today, continues to
openly take a pro-Azerbaijani position in the process of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement. Moreover, Ankara has never
concealed its alliance with Baku, which is legally documented today.
President Abdullah Gul stated directly: “We always stand for
Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan’s problem is my problem. There cannot be any
other option’.

Let’s note after the President of Turkey that there cannot be any
mediation by Ankara. However, the author of the initiative Davutoglu
is also well aware of it. With the above mentioned luggage of grave
sins (we cannot do without euphemisms – frank crimes), it is unreal to
claim to be a peace-loving dove. What, then, Ankara expects and what
are the true motives of its mediation?

Surely, it is naive to believe that by offering such an initiative,
Turkey was filled with purely pacifist ideas and concern for peace and
stability in the region. Such, if I may say so, diplomatic activity
is, above all, conditioned by own interests. And they are that, first
of all, to demonstrate to the international community its tolerance
and willingness to act as a fair peacemaker, expecting to gain
political dividends from its initiative. Second, it expects to earn
the reputation of a regional leader able to solve international
problems. Third, putting forward, in fact, a claim to the competence
of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmanship, under the aegis of which the
Karabakh settlement process is going on, Turkey is again trying to
squeeze into the format of negotiations in order to influence the
process and to achieve the desired outcome for itself and Azerbaijan
in the conflict resolution. Besides, it tries to accuse indirectly the
Minsk Group of the mediation disability, which Ankara and Baku have
repeatedly done, and tries to bring down the tendency of international
support for the self-determination of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Alas, Turkey, with its Bishkek initiative, will inevitably be
disappointed. Authoritative international organizations, including the
United Nations, the Council of Europe, the European Union and others,
pointed directly to the inevitability of the OSCE Minsk Group, the
format of which will not be changed in the nearest future, even if
Ankara and Baku wish this. And Armenia itself will hardly respond
positively to the proposal of the Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs.
Surely, Turkey also understands this, and hence its initiative on
Ankara’s hypothetical mediation is open bluff, which has nothing to do
with real politics.

Leonid Martirossian

Editor-in-Chief of Azat Artsakh newspaper

http://artsakhtert.com/eng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=784:-turkish-initiative-bluff-or-real-politics&catid=3:all&Itemid=4

Fruitless Eulogy, Or Why Safarov Made It Back to Azerbaijan

Fruitless Eulogy, Or Why Safarov Made It Back to Azerbaijan

Armen Arakelyan

01:34, September 1, 2012

The steps and declarations made by Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan
regarding the secret extradition of Azerbaijani army officer Ramil Safarov
from Budapest to Baku, remind me of a eulogy at the gravesite of one that
has already died.

The bluster and bravado exhibited by Sargsyan at an assembly of the foreign
diplomatic corps inYerevan changes nothing on the ground – Ramil Safarov is
back in Azerbaijan and has been pardoned for his heinous crime.

The murderer of Gurgen Margaryan has become a living legend.

Safarov’s safe return to his native country has less to do with any
conspiracy of Hungaryor Budapest’s betrayal of the norms of justice, than it
does with the Armenian government’s near total lack of pro-activity on the
issue.

Baku never attempted to conceal its ambition to get Safarov back. This was
apparent as far back as 2004-2006 when Safarov’s murder trial was taking
place. The ever-growing possibility that Safarov would be extradited had
been raised by NGOs in Armenia and by attorneys for the Margaryan family.
They pointed out that Hungaryand Azerbaijan were taking steps towards closer
commercial and political ties.

All the while, officialYerevan had nothing to say on the unfolding matter
nor did it take specific steps to halt the process we have just witnessed.

In this context, President Sargsyan’s directives are restricted to the
consequences of the incident; the man is attempting to put a brave face on
what has transpired in order to justify the inaction and short comings of
his own administration.

It’s no accident that Sargsyan not only condemns the Hungarian government
for the extradition, justifiably viewing it as the consequence of a
political transaction, but he also severs all diplomatic relations and
contacts with Budapest.

Yes, after what has happened, it is vital to demand an explanation from
Budapest, especially about the secret extradition of the criminal.

But, for the most part,Hungary has done nothing that it can be held
accountable for in terms of international law. It has acted according to
international treaties it has signed on to, especially the 1983 Strasbourg
Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons.

This document permits it to conduct the extradition. It also allows Bakuto
free itself from carrying out the obligations imposed by the Hungarian
court.

All of this was well known in Armenia. This is the main neglected proof that
Hungary could one day take such a step.

So what is Sargsyan now demanding from the international community – mutual
understanding or pressure on Baku? And what will it give other than some
disillusioned steps at face-saving?

No one on the outside is really interested as to what will happen to
Safarov. I mean, no one was all that interested back in February 2004 right
after the murder; not even NATO.

After all, it was at a NATO military exercise that Margaryan was murdered
but the military alliance avoided any political evaluation, and thus, by
encouraging Baku’s anti-Armenian stance and freeing the hands of member
state Hungary, facilitating the despicable transaction between the two some
eight years later.

It was this indifference that paved the way for Aliyev to make such
hysterical anti-Armenian statements at the opening session of Euronest a
few months later inBaku.

To construct your entire tactics only on the assurances of Europeans who
can’t see beyond their noses means that one has not only failed to learn the
lessons of history, but that one has no diplomatic corps to speak of as well
as no national security or administrative network.

Instead,Armenias hould have crafted a comprehensive diplomatic, public
relations and political environment that would have made Hungaryt hink twice
before taking such a step and which would have prevented the United Nations,
NASTO, OSCE and especially the European Union from attempting to close their
eyes.

But it would seem that Armenia’s authorities can only launch such a total PR
campaign and pressure against its own population.

When the issue comes down to inter-governmental relations and
politics,Armeniais transformed into a docile servant.

And we have seen the result.

http://hetq.am/eng/opinion/18019/fruitless-eulogy-or-why-safarov-made-it-back-to-azerbaijan.html

Armenian-Azerbaijani cyber attacks continue

Armenian-Azerbaijani cyber attacks continue

tert.am
17:31 – 02.09.12

The cyber attacks between Armenia and Azerbaijan continue after the
news on extradition of Azerbaijani murderer Ramil Safarov broke.

Information security expert Samvel Martirosyan told Tert.am during the
few hours the Armenian hackers broke a server ensuring the work of few
entrainment sites.

Besides they have managed to break the official website of the
Azerbaijani Culture and Tourism Ministry and the website of
Azerbaijani Public TV.

`In general the Armenia side broke 15-20 Azerbaijani websites during
two days and the Azeris about 30 but the qualitative difference is
quite big as among the websites we have broken are the Azeri
president’s, two state websites,’ he said, adding that the websites
have not been restored from yesterday.

`DDoS attacks continue as well. During these attacks the website is
not working and updating,’ he said, adding that reciprocal attack on
media websites has been registered but neither of the Armenian
websites stopped working, while in case of Azerbaijan all the main
media agencies were unable to work.

Congressman Berman Criticizes Extradition And Release Of Ramil Safar

CONGRESSMAN BERMAN CRITICIZES EXTRADITION AND RELEASE OF RAMIL SAFAROV

ARMENPRESS
1 September, 2012
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 1, ARMENPRESS: US congressman Howard Berman issued
a statement on occasion of extradition and release of blood-mad Ramil
Safarov. Armenpress reports that in the statement is particularly
mentioned: “Hungary’s release of Azerbaijani officer Ramil Safarov,
the convicted murderer of Armenian officer Gurgen Margaryan is a gross
miscarriage of justice. That Safarov in a premeditated fashion killed
Margaryan at a NATO Partnership for Peace event underscores the cynical
brutality of his act. For the Hungarian Government to have demonstrated
leniency in this matter is of grave concern.The Hungarian government
owes the Magaryan family, the Armenian nation, all its NATO partners,
and all participants in Partnership for Peace a sincere explanation
and a profound apology for its inexplicable act. The Azerbaijani
government’s decision to free Safarov is contemptible and a serious
blow to hopes for Armenian-Azerbaijani peace.”