BAKU: ‘We Believe That Armenian People Will Wake Up From Darkness Of

‘WE BELIEVE THAT ARMENIAN PEOPLE WILL WAKE UP FROM DARKNESS OF SAGSYAN’S MYTH’

News.Az
Mon 03 September 2012 13:38 GMT | 14:38 Local Time

Continuous achievements during the period of independence have written
down our history.

Besides strengthening our statehood, they served to day by day and
year by year bring us closer to one common goal – the settlement of
the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and victory.

The statement came from chairperson of the Azerbaijani Parliament’s
human rights committee Rabiyyat Aslanova in her interview to Gun.Az.

Referring to the extradition and release of Ramil Safarov, she said
that a unanimous conclusion was made on 31 August.

“The victory is close. Returning officer of the Azerbaijani National
Army Ramil Safarov from Hungary to Motherland, indeed, in a moment
occupied the agenda of world politics and media. Not only because
it shook the agenda of Armenian politics and caused mourning in the
country, but also because urgent meetings were summoned, diplomatic
ties with Hungary was frozen and embassies of other counties began
to receive threats.”

In her interview, Aslanova noted that Armenia’s policy of fooling
everyone and its people, conducted for 20 years, has failed.

“The Armenian people have become hostage of the conflict and the myth
of justice concocted by Sargsyan for the sake of his stay in power.

Armenia is in a miserable condition, while it has the potential to
be the shortest bridge and minimal investment for Europe and global
projects.

Sargsyan was “winner” 20 years ago, but today is image of a murderer
is exposed, and sooner or later he will pay the price.”

She believes that the Armenian people will wake up from the darkness
of Sagsyan’s myth.

Armenia Does Not Plan To End Azerbaijan Talks

ARMENIA DOES NOT PLAN TO END AZERBAIJAN TALKS

Vestnik Kavkaza
Sept 4 2012
Russia

Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian has emphasized today that
Yerevan does not plan to halt the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process,
Panorama.am reports.

Nalbandian discussed the problem with Argentinean Foreign Minister
Hector Timerman in Yerevan.

Yuli Edelstein, "All Tragedies Are Tragic In Different Ways"

YULI EDELSTEIN, “ALL TRAGEDIES ARE TRAGIC IN DIFFERENT WAYS”

Vestnik Kavkaza

Sept 3 2012
Russia

Author: Interview by Petr Lyukimson, Israel, exclusively to VK

The recent visit of Israeli Minister for Information and Diaspora
Yuli Edelstein to Georgia and Armenia caused controversial comments
in the media and political circles in Israel and Azerbaijan. It went
so far that in Azerbaijan the media spoke about the need of a special
statement by the Israeli Foreign Ministry about the statements made
by Edelstein while in Armenia. However, as reported in the Israeli
Foreign Ministry to VK, they are not going to make any statement
because the minister’s statements were quite correct, but each side
heard what it wanted to hear. The reporter of VK asked the minister
Yuli Edelstein what actually happened in Yerevan and what the goals
pursued by his visit to the South Caucasus are.

– Mr. Edelstein, let’s start with the purpose of your visit to Armenia
and Georgia. What brought you to this area?

– I arrived in Yerevan on the invitation of the Minister of Culture
of Armenia to sign an agreement on cultural cooperation between
our two countries. At the same time there was the celebration of
the 20th anniversary of the revival of the Jewish community, and
therefore part of our delegation also included a number of Israeli
artists. As you know, the agreement was signed, it was of great
interest, and in early 2013 Armenia will hold first Days of Israeli
Culture, and then there will be similar actions in Israel. In Georgia,
I was officially on the invitation of the Minister of the Diaspora,
to reflect on ways to intensify cooperation in this area, but at the
same time there were meetings at the Ministry of Culture, we also
reached an agreement on cultural exchange, and in November Days of
Israeli culture will be held in Tbilisi, again with the hope that in
a very short time we will organize the Days of Culture of Georgia in
Israel. Also, of course, there were meetings with representatives of
almost all the existing Jewish organizations in Georgia, and these
meetings were also extremely interesting and productive.

– Now I’m beginning to understand why your visit to Azerbaijan was
so carefully watched. Usually, when going to the South Caucasus,
Israeli ministers try to visit all three countries of the region…

– Not necessarily. Moreover, as far as I know, cooperation with
Azerbaijan in general is established, in Israel there is considerable
interest in Azerbaijani culture and, of course, no one is going
to overlook Azerbaijan. I think sooner or later I will visit this
country. Azerbaijan also has Ministry of Diaspora, and, of course, we
have a ground for cooperation in this area. By the way, we in Israel
the word “diaspora” is clearly associated with the adjective “Jewish.”

However, in reality the Ministry or other agencies for Diaspora
exist in many countries, because there is now Armenian, Azerbaijani,
Polish, Korean, and many other diasporas all over the world. And the
Ministries of Diaspora of these countries are strengthening ties with
their own tribesmen. It is no secret that Israel has a great experience
in this area, which we are willing to share, at the same time trying
to learn everything positive that has been accumulated in this field
in other countries. No doubt, these relations will also be developed
with Azerbaijan. Of course, it can always be asked why someone has
not arrived to this or that country, but remember that in Israel,
a lot of work is always waiting for me, and I have to go home.

– In recent years, Israeli politicians often visit the South Caucasus.

Why is this so? What is the place occupied by these countries in your
system of government priorities?

– Our activity in the Caucasus has two aspects. Being not only Minister
of Diaspora but also Minister of Information, I should note that the
atmosphere and the attitude toward Israel in the three countries of
the South Caucasus is strikingly different from that of many other
parts of the planet. Paraphrasing an old Soviet anecdote, we do not
have to convince anyone in Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia that “we
do not lynch Negroes,” that is, that Israel us a democratic state
which carefully monitor the human rights situation, in which there
are not any ethnic cleansings, apartheid and other things invented
by our detractors. That is, during visits to the Caucasus we do not
have to listen to all this nonsense, to explain how they are far
from reality, and we can fully engage in concrete actions, that is,
to establish bilateral cooperation in various fields.

Incidentally, not so long ago was Minister of Agriculture Orit Nuked
visited Georgia and Armenia and signed an agreement on cooperation
with these countries in her area. A couple of weeks before Tourism
Minister Yisrael Katz also visited Georgia and signed the agreement
on “open skies”, that is, on increasing cooperation in the field of
civil aviation. That is, coming to the Caucasus, we do not just kick
a dead horse; we do take action, quickly yielding fruit. But this is
only one aspect.

The second point is our regional and geopolitical interests. The South
Caucasus countries border Iran and this state is in some way trying to
impose them its influence. Of course, we are not going to interfere
in the internal affairs of these countries, but at the same time,
if we do not keep our finger on the pulse and give up the cooperation
and friendly relations with them, Iran will use it immediately.

– What happens to the Jewish communities in these countries? More
than once I have heard that the Jewish communities in Georgia and
Azerbaijan are dying, they have no future. Is this opinion true?

– You just reminded me of the great Jewish writer joke Bashevis-Singer
who said that Yiddish is like the Jewish people: it is dying all
the time, but it will never finally die. Of course, the numerousness
and prosperity experienced by the Jewish community in Azerbaijan and
Georgia before (Armenian Jews have always been very few in number)
are not the same now. By the way, this prosperity can be explained
to a large extent by the fact that in these countries there almost
was not any anti-Semitism – in contrast to, for example, Russia and
Ukraine, where I once lived. Yes, these communities are much fewer in
number now. However, we gradually said goodbye to illusions that in
the foreseeable future, all the Jews in all countries would move to
Israel, and the Jewish diaspora will disappear. Therefore the Ministry
of Diaspora was created relatively recently in order to maintain
contact with the community, so that no one said, “But they are only
500 or even 2000 people, why should we take care of them? ‘. Today
we believe that every Jew is important to us, and we understand that
life is more complicated than slogans and even in those countries where
Jews have hard times, they do not hurry to give up everything and go to
Israel. Therefore it is so important to us to maintain religious and
cultural ties with all the communities, it is important to work with
Jewish youth – because if we leave this work, we will lose the Jews.

– The political elite and the media of Azerbaijan took your statement,
made during a visit to the Museum of the Armenian Genocide in Yerevan,
with considerable concern. Many people in Baku see this as one more
step towards official recognition of the tragic events of 1915 as
genocide of the Armenians. Is this view true?

– Let us start with the facts. I actually visited the Armenian Genocide
Museum and laid a wreath at the memorial to the dead, and then I
made a tour of this museum. I still think that this is absolutely
right. It would be unacceptable if, in response to an invitation to
visit this museum, I would have said, “Sorry, I cannot, because in
this matter, our countries have different political and geopolitical
interests.” During the tour, I saw that the management of the museum
changes the exposure, and I noticed that in this field Yerevan museum
definitely has something to learn from the Holocaust Memorial Museum
“Yad Vashem”, and these two museums would do well to cooperate. I
personally think that this cooperation seems to be useful.

– Armenian media, as well as Azerbaijani media basing on the recent
reports, claim that you compare the Holocaust with the events of 1915
and almost equalized them.

– I did not say this. Our position on this issue is clear: we are
certainly against comparing the Holocaust and equating it to any
other tragic event in world history. For example, three years ago,
I paid a visit to Lithuania and Latvia, and a little before in Europe
it was decided to celebrate the Day of Remembrance of the Victims of
Nazism and Stalinist terror. I think I will not surprise anyone if
I say that the Stalinist terror was nothing less in its scope and in
its devilment than Nazism. Yet at all the press conferences and in all
my speeches, I have emphasized that the Holocaust is the Holocaust,
it stands alone, but this does not mean that we should forget the
victims of Stalinism. Thus, we can work together, we can discuss it,
but, to paraphrase Tolstoy, all tragedies are tragic in different
ways and should not be compared with the events in Turkey, Rwanda,
Nanchine and elsewhere.

– Are there, in your view, the parallels between the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the conflict between Armenia and
Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh?

– Probably, certain parallels may exist, but I do not think it’s
worth doing – just as it is not necessary to draw parallels between
the Holocaust and other tragic events of world history. Oddly enough,
drawing parallels not only does not help resolve these conflicts,
but also prevents this, because any inter-ethnic, inter-religious,
regional conflict is a unique combination of several factors.

Universal way to solve the conflict does not exist. Academic articles
on such comparisons are useless.

– What is your general feeling of visiting Armenia and Georgia? Are
those who speak of “Georgian miracle”, the unprecedented economic
boom in this country, right? And is there a feeling that Armenia is
really jammed in the “grip of the blockade?”

– Let me remind you that my visits to both countries were not long – I
was there for two days. I could not see and understand a lot of details
during my visit. But I really felt that Georgia is on the rise. The
pace of new construction and infrastructure development in Georgia
is enormous, and this is one of the surest signs of prosperity. But
in Armenia, by the way, there is also quite a lot of building., I
have not noticed any signs of economic collapse. Quite the contrary:
the republic is full of multilingual tourists, and at least tourism
is not in decline.

– What is the role of Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia in the
information war waged by Israel?

– Speaking of the support in the international arena, as it is known,
Georgia has repeatedly supported Israel’s position in international
forums, while Armenia and Azerbaijan have not provided their support
to Israel yet. We hope that our more and more activated relations will
change this. At the same time, the fact that such a significant Muslim
country as Azerbaijan is on friendly terms with Israel is important
and is a model for building relationships with other countries in
the Islamic world. Our friendly relations with Azerbaijan, Georgia
and Armenia clearly show that Ahmadinejad and his supporters and
accomplices have no special influence not only in the whole world,
but even in their region. And this is also very, very important.

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/interviews/politics/30948.html

WSJ: Hungary Taking Heat For Extraditing Azeri Convict

HUNGARY TAKING HEAT FOR EXTRADITING AZERI CONVICT
By Gergo Racz

Wall Street Journal

Sept 3 2012
NY

Hungary has raised concerns in the United States and the European Union
after Budapest unexpectedly extradited an Azerbaijani murder convict.

Ramil Sahib Safarov was convicted of premeditated murder and sentenced
to life in prison after he used an ax to kill an Armenian national
Gurgen Margarjan in Budapest in 2004. The two were participating in
an international military exercise.

An investigation found that Mr. Safarov’s targeted Mr. Margarjan
purely out of political reasons to reflect the deeply-rooted animosity
between their home nations.

Mr. Safarov Friday arrived in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, to
a hero’s welcome, immediately received a pardon, was set free and
promoted. Armenia was outraged and the country’s President Serzh
Sargsyan announced that Yerevan was severing diplomatic ties with
Hungary as a result.

“Not I or Armenia can accept this. The Armenian people will not
forgive this,” he said.

The Hungarian government condemned Azerbaijan’s actions and claimed
it was misinformed by Baku on how Mr. Safarov would be treated. He
was extradited with the original intent of serving the rest of his
prison sentence at home, the government in Budapest said.

State secretary Peter Szijjarto also tried to reject the government’s
culpability in the events and stated that the transfer was transparent
and conducted in line with international law.

Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban Monday downplayed the incident
and said the government is “acknowledging the debate with coolness
and calm.”

The opposition took a different tone.

“Hungary’s government aided a murderer to freedom,” said head of the
main opposition socialist MSZP party, Attila Mesterhazy.

“We wouldn’t even dare consider the prospect that the Hungary
extradited Ramil Safarov…in return for Azerbaijan’s investments,”
representatives of the green opposition LMP party said citing reports
form last week that the government is planning to issue 2 billion to
3 billion euros ($2.5 billion to $3.7 billion) in debt to Azerbaijan.

The government is scheduled to issue altogether 4 billion euros
this year.

Besides the diplomatic backlash for Hungary, the incident has also
invigorated the tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan. President
Sargsyan said that Azerbaijan “has been warned” and that while Yerevan
doesn’t war, it definitely won’t back away from one.

http://blogs.wsj.com/emergingeurope/2012/09/03/hungary-taking-heat-for-extraditing-azeri-convict/

Eu In Fact Approves Safarov’s Transfer To Azerbaijan By Saying It Wa

EU IN FACT APPROVES SAFAROV’S TRANSFER TO AZERBAIJAN BY SAYING IT WAS DONE IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE CONVENTION OF STRASBOURG

Mediamax
Armenia
Sept 3 2012

The spokespersons of Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the
Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice President of the
Commission and Stefan Fule, European Commissioner for Enlargement
and Neighbourhood Policy, issued the following statement today:

“The High Representative and Commissioner Fule are concerned by
the news that the President of Azerbaijan has pardoned Azerbaijani
army officer Ramil Safarov, who was convicted and sentenced to life
imprisonment for the murder of Armenian Army officer Gurgen Margaryan
in Budapest in 2004.

Ramil Safarov was transferred from Hungary to Azerbaijan on 31
August on the basis of an Azerbaijani request, in the framework of
the Convention of Strasbourg on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons of
21 March 1983, to serve the rest of his sentence. EU representatives
are in contact with the relevant authorities and will continue to
follow the situation closely.

In the interest of regional stability and on-going efforts towards
reconciliation, the High Representative and Commissioner Fule
reiterate their call on Azerbaijan and Armenia to exercise restraint,
on the ground as well as in public statements, in order to prevent
an escalation of the situation.”

Hungary Considers "Unacceptable" Azerbaijan’S Decision To Pardon Ram

HUNGARY CONSIDERS “UNACCEPTABLE” AZERBAIJAN’S DECISION TO PARDON RAMIL SAFAROV

Mediamax

Sept 3 2012
Armenia

Yerevan, September 3. /Mediamax/. Hungary considers it unacceptable
and expresses utter disapproval at the fact that Ramil Safarov, who
was sentenced for manslaughter by Hungarian court, received pardon
from the President of Azerbaijan.

Zsolt Nemeth, Parliamentary State Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, asked Vilayat Guliyev, Azerbaijan’s Ambassador to Hungary,
into his office on September 2 to inform Ambassador Guliyev about
the position of the Government of Hungary.

Zsolt Nemeth has pointed out that the measures made by Azerbaijan are
contrary to the relevant rules of international law and blatantly
contradict the promise officially confirmed by Azerbaijan earlier
that Safarov would continue to serve his sentence in Azerbaijan.”The
steps taken by the Azeri party are not appropriate with respect to
the relation of mutual trust that has developed between our countries
over the past years, and which could serve to further improve our
bilateral cooperation”, Hungary’s MFA stated.

The Parliamentary State Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
handed over the following diplomatic note to the Ambassador of
Azerbaijan:

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Hungary presents its compliments
to the Embassy of the Republic of Azerbaijan in Budapest and has the
honour to communicate the following.

The Government of Hungary was astonished to receive the news about
the decision of the Azerbaijani side granting pardon to Ramil Sahib
Safarov, who was sentenced to life imprisonment for manslaughter
in 2006.

Hungary refuses to accept and condemns the action of Azerbaijan,
which contradicts the relevant rules of international law and sharply
contrasts the undertaking of the Azerbaijani side in this matter,
confirmed by the Deputy Minister of Justice of the Republic of
Azerbaijan in his letter XX-NBSKFO/3743/4/2012 of 15 August 2012
addressed to the Ministry of Public Administration and Justice
of Hungary. In this letter the Republic of Azerbaijan quoting the
relevant international Convention undertook that the sentenced person
will serve the remaining part of his prison sentence in the Republic
of Azerbaijan and may be released on conditional parole only after
he has served at least 25 years of his sentence.

Hungary regards the decision of Azerbaijan inconsistent with the
spirit of cooperation based on mutual trust that has been achieved
during the past years between our respective countries.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Hungary avails itself of this
opportunity to renew to the Embassy of the Republic of Azerbaijan in
Budapest the assurances of its highest considerations”.

http://www.mediamax.am/en/news/politics/5721/

Armenia’s Ministry Of Justice Advices Syrian-Armenians To Call Hot L

ARMENIA’S MINISTRY OF JUSTICE ADVICES SYRIAN-ARMENIANS TO CALL HOT LINE

news.am
September 03, 2012 | 18:34

YEREVAN. – The Ministry of Justice of Armenia turned to the
Syrian-Armenians.

In the message released for the Syrian-Armenian compatriots,
the Ministry calls them to call the Ministry’s hot line and get
consultations about issues which are within the authority of the
Ministry. The services of the Justice Ministry may include the
registration of the civil acts, which include birth, marriage, death,
divorce, child adoption, determination of paternity, name change
and apostil, as well as state registration of the legal entities and
notary issues.

Azeri FM "Puzzled" Over U.S. Response To Safarov Liberation

AZERI FM “PUZZLED” OVER U.S. RESPONSE TO SAFAROV LIBERATION

PanARMENIAN.Net
September 3, 2012 – 21:52 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Azeri Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov had a
telephone conversation with U.S. Deputy Secretary of State William
Burns, Foreign Ministry spokesman Elman Abdullayev said.

As Mammadyarov noted during a conversation, “Azerbaijan cannot
understand U.S. reaction over the liberation of Ramil Safarov.”

Earlier, U.S. National Security Council (NSC) Spokesman Tommy Vietor
commented on Azerbaijan’s Decision to Pardon Ramil Safarov.

“President Barack Obama is deeply concerned by announcement that
the President of Azerbaijan has pardoned Ramil Safarov following
his return from Hungary. Safarov confessed to the murder of Armenian
Army officer Gurgen Margaryan in Budapest in 2004, and was serving a
life sentence in Hungary for this brutal crime. We are communicating
to Azerbaijani authorities our disappointment about the decision to
pardon Safarov. This action is contrary to ongoing efforts to reduce
regional tensions and promote reconciliation. The United States is
also requesting an explanation from Hungary regarding its decision
to transfer Safarov to Azerbaijan.”

Ramil Safarov, the Azerbaijani army officer who was serving a life
sentence in Hungary for axing to death Armenian Lt. Gurgen Margaryan,
was extradited to Azerbaijan and pardoned by Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev.

Official Yerevan reacted by suspending diplomatic ties with Hungary.

The Department of State, through a formal announcement issued by
Acting Deputy Spokesman Patrick Ventrell, also took a stand against
Hungary’s extradition and Azerbaijan’s pardon, explaining that: “The
United States is extremely troubled by the news that the President
of Azerbaijan pardoned Azerbaijani army officer Ramil Safarov, who
returned to Baku today following his transfer from Hungary. . . . We
are expressing our deep concern to Azerbaijan regarding this action
and seeking an explanation. We are also seeking further details from
Hungary regarding the decision to transfer Mr. Safarov to Azerbaijan.”

Ashton And Fule Are Concerned About The Decision Of The President Of

ASHTON AND FULE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE DECISION OF THE PRESIDENT OF AZERBAIJAN TO RELEASE RAMIL SAFAROV

ARMENPRESS
3 September, 2012
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 3, ARMENPRESS: Catherine Ashton, High Representative
of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and
tefan Fule, European Commissioner on Enlargement and Neighborhood
Policy issued today the following statement on the release of Ramil
Safarov. As Armenpress was informed at the Press center of the
European External Action Service, the statement reads as follows,
“The High Representative and Commissioner Fule are concerned by the
news that the President of

Azerbaijan has pardoned Azerbaijani army officer Ramil Safarov, who
was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of
Armenian Army officer Gurgen Margaryan in Budapest in 2004.

Ramil Safarov was transferred from Hungary to Azerbaijan on 31 August
on the basis of an

Azerbaijani request, in the framework of the Convention of Strasbourg
on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons of 21 March 1983, to serve the
rest of his sentence. EU representatives are in contact with the
relevant authorities and will continue to follow the situation closely.

In the interest of regional stability and on-going efforts towards
reconciliation, the High

Representative and Commissioner Fule reiterate their call on Azerbaijan
and Armenia to exercise restraint, on the ground as well as in public
statements, in order to prevent an escalation of the situation.”

AZAD Sent Open Letter To Secretary Hillary Clinton On Ramil Safarov

AZAD SENT OPEN LETTER TO SECRETARY HILLARY CLINTON ON RAMIL SAFAROV CONTROVERSY

WASHINGTON, DC. September 2, 2012: The Azerbaijani Americans for
Democracy has addressed an open letter to the US Secretary of State
on the issue of the Azerbaijani officer Ramil Safarov. Below is the
full text of the letter:

Dear Madam Secretary,

On August 31, the US State Department issued a statement noting
that it was “extremely troubled by the news that the President of
Azerbaijan pardoned the Azerbaijani army officer Ramil Safarov,” who
killed an Armenian officer Gurgen Margaryan at a NATO sponsored event
in Budapest, Hungary, after the latter insulted the Azerbaijani flag. A
strongly worded statement from the US State Department expressed ~Sdeep
concern~T and underscored that the US is ~Sseeking an explanation~T
from Azerbaijan and ~Salso seeking further details from Hungary”
about the extradition of Safarov to Azerbaijan.

Ilham Aliyev’s government has committed countless transgressions
violating the rights of hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijani
citizens. Scores of people were physically attacked, arrested,
tortured, and some died at the hands of the Aliyev regime. Yet, the
strongest ever US State Department protest to the actions taken by
the dictatorship in Baku seem to be motivated not by the concerns for
rights and freedoms of the people of Azerbaijan, but rather by the
deference to the out-of-proportion influence of the Armenian lobby
on the US foreign policy.

It is difficult to understand the urgency and importance given by
the US State Department to the pardoning of the Azerbaijani soldier
Ramil Safarov.

Safarov’s extradition from Hungary could have been handled by
Azerbaijan with more consideration of diplomatic sensitivities
and without aggrandizing someone sentenced to life for killing an
Armenian officer. However, the practice of extraditing convicted
foreign citizens to their home countries where they receive lenient
terms or pardons is hardly extraordinary. One may recall the case of an
Armenian terrorist Varoujan Garabedian, convicted in France for bombing
Turkish Airlines check-in counter, subsequently freed and extradited
to Armenia. Garabedian was greeted as a national hero by the president
of Armenia and given the rank of an army colonel. The current Armenian
Minister of Defense, Seyran Ohanyan, had led a well-documented massacre
of Azeri civilians by Armenian forces in the town Khodjaly in 1992.

What is extraordinary and puzzling is that the arguably strongest-ever
criticism used by the US leadership against the Azerbaijani authorities
comes in response to the Ramil Safarov incident, rather than the
numerous grave trespasses on democracy and human rights perpetrated
by the Aliyev dictatorship against Azerbaijani citizens. It is
unfortunate that given the gross injustices perpetrated by the Aliyev
regime against its own people over the past two decades, the US State
Department appears to show greater concern for the sensitivities of
Armenia which currently occupies 20 percent of Azerbaijani territories,
having driven out all of its Azeri inhabitants.

It would be highly desirable to see equally strong reactions by
the US administration to fraudulent elections, violent attacks
against peaceful protesters, arrest, torture, beating and murder of
journalists, dissidents and civic activists in Azerbaijan. In many
of those instances, instead of expressions of “deep concern” and
“extreme trouble”, and demands of explanation from the Azerbaijani
government, as it was included in the US State Department~Rs and
National Security Council spokesperson~Rs statements on Safarov case,
the United States responded with much milder statements of concern
and “hopes for improvement”, effectively watering them down by the
assurances of cooperation and alliance with the ruling regime in Baku.

We cannot help but remember the ~Selection victory~T congratulations
delivered on behalf of the US government by the Deputy Secretary of
State Richard Armitage to the Azerbaijani dictator Ilham Aliyev while
the streets of Baku were still reeling from violent suppression of
protests against the wholesale election fraud in October of 2003.

More recently, the nomination of Matthew Bryza to the position of
a US Ambassador to Azerbaijan and his failed Senate confirmation
process revealed a misplaced emphasis in the US approach towards the
Azerbaijani regime. Mr.

Bryza~Rs personal connections to the Azerbaijani regime were
questioned extensively in light of his perceived anti-Armenian bias
and pro-Azerbaijani position on the Karabakh conflict. Solely on those
grounds, two US senators effectively blocked his confirmation. His
credentials on democracy and human rights were never questioned by the
US government or members of the Congress. Ironically, Matthew Bryza~Rs
actions during and after his brief ambassadorship tenure – including
his high-profile job with an oil firm linked to Azerbaijan~Rs State
Oil Company, and his statements supportive of the Aliyev government
and lacking criticism of its human rights record – proved his bias
in favor of the regime in Baku on the issue of democracy, but not on
the Karabakh problem or on the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict.

The corrupt dynastical Azerbaijani dictatorship led by Ilham Aliyev
can and should, indeed, be heavily criticized and pressured by the
US and other Western governments. However, the issue of democracy and
human rights, and not the Armenian-Azerbaijani relations, is the most
appropriate subject where the strongest language and the heaviest
pressure should be applied.

The current short-sighted foreign policy focus might temporarily
appease the ethnic-Armenian lobby groups, but it certainly does not
serve the US national interests in Azerbaijan and the broader region,
harms the democratic development in that country, damages the US
reputation in the eyes of Azerbaijani people and further complicates
the resolution of the Karabakh problem.

Sincerely yours,

Elmar Chakhtakhtinski, Chairman Azerbaijani-Americans for Democracy

http://azerireport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3695&Itemid=53