"My Mother’S Voice" Tells Story Of "Armenian Anne Frank"

“MY MOTHER’S VOICE” TELLS STORY OF “ARMENIAN ANNE FRANK”

15:44, 21 November, 2012

South Pasadena resident Kay Mouradian will screen her documentary,
My Mother’s Voice, at the Egyptian Theater on December 1. As reports
“Armenpress” citing southpasadena.patch.com, when Kay Mouradian was
growing up in Boston, she didn’t pay much attention to her mother’s
tragic tales about losing family members to the genocide of 1915. She
just wanted to be like other American kids. As an adult, the South
Pasadena filmmaker believes it is her duty to give voice to her mother,
as well as the millions who were slaughtered during World War 1.

Mouradian tells the story of Flora Munushian and depicts events
endured by the Turkish Armenian community during the early 1900s.

Munushian lost her family to the 1915 genocide, and lived an early
life reminiscent of an “Armenian Anne Frank,” Mouradian has said.

My Mother’s Voice was one of the films nominated for the 2012 ARPA
film festival in Los Angeles, and in October was awarded Honorable
Mention at the 2012 Pomegranate Film Festival in Toronto.

The documentary’s description from the festival: Armenians lost an
incredibly vibrant, successful, and valuable gene pool of 1.5 million
people as a result of the 1915 Genocide. This short film is one young
girl’s poignant story, that of fourteen-year-old Flora Munushian, an
epic chapter in Armenian history. An Armenian Anne Frank in an earlier
generation, Flora’s incredible story honors her people with dignity
and teaches about the spirit of hope, love, and justice. Flora’s voice
is that of all the victims and survivors of the Armenian Genocide,
a story that must not be forgotten.

Soaring On The Wings Of Imagination To Face The Inconvenient Reality

Soaring on the Wings of Imagination To Face the Inconvenient Reality

November 20, 2012

Andrew Demirdjian, Ph.D

A Commentary by Z. S. Andrew Demirdjian, Ph.D., the author of The
Viability of a Worldwide Armenian Organization.

Let us begin by testing the boundaries of our imagination. What if
you were told that in our life time animals will discover fire and
begin to BBQ (cook) their food? Your answer would be “Na” for this
would have profound implications for wildfire which would eventually
wipe out life on our plant.

What if you were told that in our life time we shall see trees begin
to walk to other locations in search of better nutrients and water?

Your likely answer would be “Nope” for this too would be having
drastic implications for our driving on the roads?

What if you were told that in our life time land birds shall begin
to swim? Again, you answer would be “not really” for this would also
have drastic implications for our sushi (seafood) supplies for human
consumption.

Most likely your responses to the above three questions are that
these assumptions are wild prognostication, a figment of one’s
imagination. Agreed.

What if you were told that the Azaris will begin in our life time
to wage war against Armenians in their attempt to recapture Artsakh
(Ngoro-Karabakh), (an Armenian historic province long before the
city of Tigranakert was built there in  honor of  King Tigranes the
Great during the Hellenistic Period from 323 BC to 31 BC)? Naturally,
the recapturing war would have dangerous consequences for the twin
Armenian republics.

What would be your response this time?  Like many Armenians, if
you say “farfetched” or that the “chances are very slim” because
Russia is on our side and Azerbaijan will not dare to attack us or
that Armenia is very strong now -then, I challenge you to continue
reading this commentary to let your imagination soar to see the likely
eventuality. We do not want to see you caught by the enemy while you
are sleeping.

Table 1 contains some sobering statistics to convince you of the
growing danger from Azerbaijan as is objectively shown in the
statistical data of Armenia vs. Azerbaijan.

Table 1 

Some Statistics* on Population, Economy, & Military

Armenia Azerbaijan Difference

 

Population:

2, 970,488 (2012)     9,493,600 (2012) 219% >Armenia

Population Growth Rate:

0.107 % (2012)    1.17% (2012)   990% >Armenia

Total Fertility Rate:

1.38 child./woman (2012)  1.92 child./woman 39%>Armenia

Budget Expenditures:

$2.57 billion (2011)  $20.56 billion (2011)  700%>Armenia

Budget Revenues:

$1.92 billion (2009)    $12.85 billion (2009)     569%>Armenia

Debt – External:

$7.34 billion (2011)  $3.89 billion (2011)    88 %< Armenia Exports: $1.32 billion (2011)    $23.48 billion (2011)  1680%>Armenia

Imports:

$3.54 billion (2011)  $7.08 billion (2011) 100%>Armenia

GDP Purchas. Power Parity:

$17.95 billion (2011)    $93.02 billion (2011)   420%>Armenia

GDP- Real Growth Rate:

4.6% (2011)   0.2% (2011)    2200 %< Armenia! Unemployment Rate: 5.9% (2011)   1% (2011) 490 %< Armenia Labor Force: 1.194 million (2011)   6.119 million (2011)  412%>Armenia

Armed Forces Personnel:**

6 units (2008) 54 units (2008) 800%>Armenia

41,000 (2008)   72,000 (2008)  76%>Armenia

Forces in aircraft:

6 units (2008)  54 units (2008) 800%>Armenia

Forces in Tanks:

110 units (2008)    220 units (2008) 100%>Armenia

Forces in helicopters:

8 units (2008)    15 units (2008) 88%>Armenia

Manpower – Males Ages 15-49:

919, 582     2,159,450 (2008) 135%>Armenia

Manpower – Reaching Military Age:

30, 548 (2008)     94,402 (2008)   209%>Armenia

*The sources of the above statistics are based on estimates provided
by the CIA (Central Intelligence Administration of the United States)
Factbook, Walden University Research Department, and Michigan State
University Research Center – and not by the Armenian or Azerbaijani
governments; (therefore, they are rather more reliable).

**The branches of the Armed Forces of Armenia consist of Ground
Forces, Nagorno-Karabakh Self Defense Force (NKSDF), Air Force and
Air Defense while the Azerbaijani Armed Forces consist of Air, Army,
Navy, Air and Air Defense Forces. While the stats on the population
and the economy of the two countries are current from 2011 and 2012,
the military estimates are from the year 2008 which were the latest
available. Military information is ordinarily sensitive and secrete.

During the last decade, however Azerbaijan has amassed greater
military might because of petro dollars and “allies” like Israel,
Turkey, and the USA.

Let your mind soar on the wings of imagination to see the daunting
reality of the impending national problems facing the Republic
of Armenia, and the Republic of Artsakh. Most of us adhere to the
fossilized idea that we are protected or even invincible and that Big
Brother Russia will come to the rescue in the event of a full-fledged
attack.

The twin Armenian republics are doing their best to be ready to
defend the motherland. The idea is not to alarm anyone but to serve
as a wake-up call to the Diaspora to get up and organize for such
an eventuality. History tells us that the Armenians have been caught
unprepared, unorganized too many times in the past. It seems we tend
not to learn from our experiences. Let us not use stone age speed
for moving forward.

As is shown in Table 1, Azerbaijan outshined Armenia in all the three
major areas of the population, economy, and the military. There was
only one exception in the economy area and that Armenia had a higher
GDP growth rate than Azerbaijan. In all other aspects, Azerbaijan
excelled with a flying color.

Azerbaijan’s might is predicated on its ethnic diversity consisting
of the amalgamation of Mountain Jews, Caucasian Albanians, Pontic
Greeks, Arabs, Armenians, Assyrians, Georgians, Persians, Kurds,
Turks to name a few. I read somewhere that during the Soviet era over
30,000 Armenian women had married with Azari men.

Azerbaijan’s might is also based on its main jihadist religion of
Islam, steady population growth, rising petro dollars and committed
allies. What I mean is that we are not dealing with a small primitive
nomadic Turkish tribe coming from Central Asia any more. Like Turkey,
Azerbaijan is achievement oriented with a vibrant population imbued
with many cultures.

While the Armenian Diaspora raises funds for roads, schools, and
housing, the defense of the two Armenian republics is relegated. We
need to beef up the defense without it our roads, schools, and houses
will probably be trodden and destroyed one of these days.

Akin to earthquake preparedness, it is imperative to face the near
future challenges looming on the horizon despite our reliance on
foreign intervention on and in our behalf.

If the Diaspora were organized, we would have made capital of the
recent release of the convicted murderer (Azerbaijani officer Ramil
Safarov) for the gruesome axing of an Armenian officer while in sleep
in 2004. NATO, Hungary, and Azerbaijan should have been put to shame
for the transfer, release and glorification of this mad man.

The criminal was not a lone man, or just one person. Condoning the
act, rewarding the criminal, treating the criminal as a national
hero indicates that Azerbaijan fails to meet the human standards of
Western civilization. The entire nation, therefore, has to be blamed
for glorifying the criminal who committed a barbarian act and whose
government not only condoned it, but also treated the heinous crime
as a brave act.

The Talmud has a saying: “Who can protest an injustice but does not
is an accomplice to the act”. To leave the destiny of Artsakh in the
hands of the Azaris would be a precarious proposition to say the least.

The barbaric act alone should justify to the rest of the civilized
world as to why the Armenians of Artsakh should remain independent
based on self-determination and not under the criminally minded
government of Azerbaijan.

In the event of war, a worldwide Armenian organization would play a
vital role in defending the motherland. How many Diaspora Armenians
would be willing and ready to come to the rescue of their brothers
and sisters should be known in advance? How many Diaspora Armenians
would volunteer for the defense? What basic preparedness is needed
and who would provide that, etc., etc.?

When Armenia is under attack, most of the young and able-bodied
Armenians are in overseas working. A large number of them are married
and have families. When war breaks out, it would be difficult to
respond to the call of duty. It would be chaotic as the war drags on.

Sustainability is the main issue here. How long can Armenia endure
the human and material loss as a result of protracted war?

A worldwide Armenian organization would instill and even boost
confidence in the twin Armenian republics that their brothers and
sisters have committed themselves to helping out with the conflict.

Such a social mobilization would also serve as a deterrent to the
enemy by showing that they will be facing the federation of the
Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Artsakh, and the formidable
Armenian Diaspora. In this way, we would be practicing management by
objectives rather than management by crisis.

History is mostly made by individuals rather than groups. We need
leaders to step forth and begin to organize the Diaspora.

A glance at the Armenian history would show one that Armenians have
been disunited even in the face of the enemy. Then as now, Armenians
have suffered from lack of a world organization as noted by many
non-Armenian observers.

Against the backdrop of increasing threat from Azerbaijan, we cannot
sleep while the sworn enemy readies for a forceful recapture of
Artsakh. Let us not kid ourselves about the power of Azerbaijan. Let
us take that as given even if we are wrong about it, and proceed
planning from that premise. As you well know, wars are not fought on
horseback nowadays nor are they carried on in the tranches anymore.

High-tech warfare has already been used in many of the recent
international conflicts. For example, weapons in Iraqi war have been
high-tech wonders, like unmanned drones that drop Hellfire missiles
on the enemy below, troupes like US Sergeant Christopher Lejeune went
into battle with different kind of weapons, one so stealthy that
few Americans even knew of its deployment. In today’s world, where
paradigm shifts are the order of the day, change is the only constant.

Many Armenians hold the notion that in the event of war with
Azerbaijan, Armenia will come out victorious. That may very well
be true, but the price of victory maybe too high.  However, there
is such a thing as victory in defeat: the fateful epic Battle of
Avarayr (May 26, 451 AD) is a case in point. Also, there is defeat
in victory: the tiny Armenian nation cannot afford to lose any part
of its youth to war. Armenia is already bleeding from dual loss of
mostly able-bodied young men and women to debilitating brain drain,
skilled laborers and to the imperceptible jaws of assimilation of
the Diaspora around the world.

Unleash your imaginative powers to soar in the realm of possibilities
and to come up with the conviction that Armenians should unite
internationally in order to be able to face this impending calamity.

I know that most of you agree with that, yet hesitate to clear away
the negative energy of dwelling on our differences to put the muscle
behind the unity idea.

Our national purpose is bigger than our differences. Our only hope
is you, the young Armenian men and women, to come forth and put some
activation energy in our veins to make us find a common ground to
move forward and face the inconvenient reality of the growing threat
to our very existence.

Note: My special thanks go to Ms. Zara Mokatsian for her careful
review of the statistical data in Table 1.

http://www.armenianlife.com/2012/11/20/soaring-on-the-wings-of-imagination-to-face-the-inconvenient-reality/

Corpse Found Under Bridge

CORPSE FOUND UNDER BRIDGE

03:22 PM | TODAY | SOCIAL

A corpse has been found under Kievyan bridge in Yerevan at 12.23
November 21.

A team of rescuers and a task force were dispatched to the scene to
remove the body from the Hrazdan river, the Ministry of Emergency
Situations reports.

The Ministry will give more details later in the day.

http://www.a1plus.am/en/social/2012/11/21/corpse

Como Termino Uruguay Envuelto En Un Conflicto Diplomatico En El Cauc

COMO TERMINO URUGUAY ENVUELTO EN UN CONFLICTO DIPLOMATICO EN EL CAUCASO
Natalio Cosoy

BBC Mundo
Hace 1 h 28 min

La region se encuentra en una situacion de alta tension.

Como termino Uruguay envuelto en un conflicto diplomatico con la mas
grande exrepública sovietica del Caucaso, Azerbaiyan, a mas de 13.000
kilometros de distancia de Montevideo?

Todo comenzo con la visita de una delegacion de parlamentarios
uruguayos a Armenia, quienes el 13 y 14 de noviembre cruzaron a
Azerbaiyan e ingresaron en la region separatista de Nagorno Karabaj,
en la que viven algo menos de 150.000 personas de origen armenio,
y se reunieron con autoridades locales.

Contenido relacionado La estatua azerí que causa controversia en Mexico
OTAN preocupada por decision de Azerbaiyan de indultar a un militar
Armenia dice que esta lista para la guerra con Azerbaiyan Al saber de
la visita, Azerbaiyan, que considera al territorio de Nagorno Karabaj
como propio, envio una queja formal a la Cancillería uruguaya en la
que solicito que investigue que fue lo que sucedio. La nota sostenía
que la visita fue realizada sin permiso del gobierno azerbaiyano,
que fue ilegal, y que podría afectar las negociaciones y el proceso
de paz entre ese país y Nagorno Karabaj.

Los armenios de Nargorno Karabaj creen -y Azerbaiyan teme- que Uruguay
podría convertirse en el primer país en dar reconocimiento al estado
de facto.

La agencia de noticias APA (Agencia de Prensa de Azerbaiyan, una
empresa privada de distribucion de noticias del Caucaso) publico una
parte de la respuesta del país sudamericano a la queja de Azerbaiyan,
donde se lee que el “principal deseo del gobierno de Uruguay no es
otro que hacer esfuerzos para resolver el conflicto”. Y agrega que el
comportamiento o las posiciones uruguayas “no deben ser interpretadas
fuera de ese marco”.

El rol de la diaspora El origen del conflicto

En 1991, tras la ruptura de la Union Sovietica y en medio de
un conflicto armado entre la minoría armenia en Nagorno Karabaj
(respaldada por Armenia) y Azerbaiyan, la region montañosa se declaro
independiente en forma unilateral.

Esa guerra, que había comenzado en 1988 y se extendio hasta 1994,
fue uno de los mas sangrientos conflictos disparados tras la ruptura
del bloque sovietico. Decenas de miles de personas murieron y cerca de
un millon debieron huir de sus hogares. Unos 800.000 azeríes dejaron
Karabaj, mientras alrededor de 300.000 armenios que vivían en el
norte de Azerbaiyan, se refugiaron en Armenia.

Aunque hace 20 años que Karabaj se declaro independiente, el estatus
de la region no se ha resuelto aún, ya que ninguna nacion en el mundo
le ha dado reconocimiento.

Hasta el momento, la comunidad internacional le ha dado casi
íntegramente la razon a Azerbiayan.

Ni siquiera Armenia reconoce a Nagorno Karabaj como un estado
independiente, entre otras cosas porque podría causarle un problema a
Rusia, que es su aliado pero tambien mantiene vínculos con Azerbaiyan.

La única institucion estatal que ha reconocido a Karabaj ha sido, este
año, el Parlamento del mayor estado de Australia, Nueva Gales del Sur.

Azerbaiyan considera a Nagorno Karabaj parte de sus territorios
historicos. Y que aunque no hay un elemento economico en la disputa,
sí hay un componente cultural. Algunas de las principales figuras
artísticas y culturales azerbaiyanas provienen de la region, por lo
que sienten que esa es una de las cunas de su cultura.

Pero Armenia y las personas de origen armenio que habitan en Karabaj
dicen que ese pueblo tiene derecho a su autodeterminacion.

Los intentos de mediacion internacional encabezados por Estados Unidos,
Francia y Rusia no han logrado darle una resolucion definitiva al
conflicto.

Uno de los elementos que sostiene la esperanza en Karabaj de que
Uruguay reconozca su independencia es el hecho de que en 1965 Uruguay
fue el primer país del mundo en decir que las matanzas masivas de
armenios llevadas a cabo por el Imperio Otomano durante el período
de la Primera Guerra Mundial se habían tratado de un genocidio.

Uruguay tambien fue la primera nacion latinoamericana en reconocer
al Estado de Israel en 1948. Y en 2011 reconocio la existencia de un
Estado palestino.

A todo eso debe sumarse el rol de la diaspora armenia en Uruguay,
integrada por descendientes de inmigrantes que llegaron en la decada
de 1920, huyendo de la masacre que el Imperio Otomano -actual Turquía-
llevo a cabo contra los armenios de la region a comienzos del siglo XX.

Esa colectividad es pequeña (menos de 16.000 personas), pero tiene
peso dentro de un país con mas de 3,3 millones de habitantes. “Muchos
descendientes de armenios en Uruguay ocupan posiciones importantes
en diferentes areas de la sociedad; de la política al deporte,
de los negocios a los medios”, le explica a la BBC Felipe Arocena,
Profesor de Sociología de la Universidad de la República de Uruguay.

Arocena agrega que su país es “muy sensible a la opinion de la diaspora
armenia”. Ciertamente, desde la colectividad armenia defienden su
derecho a cabildear para que el gobierno lleve adelante ciertas
políticas, como respaldar la causa de Nagorno Karabaj.

“¿Cual es el problema?”, le dijo a la BBC el Dr. Gustavo Zulaiman,
expresidente de la Union General Armenia de Beneficencia de Uruguay.

“Los lobbies existen en todos”, explico. “Nosotros somos armenios
en Uruguay, pero somos uruguayos tambien, y es obvio que uno tiene
injerencia en los países en los que vive”.

“¿Acaso Azerbaiyan no hace lobby en otros lados? Ese es el juego
político de estos tiempos”, sentencio.

A fines de julio de este año el presidente de Uruguay Jose Mujica y
el ministro de Relaciones Exteriores Luis Almagro se habían reunido
con el canciller de Azerbaiyan, Elmar Mammadyarov, quien estaba de
gira por Sudamerica. Hablaron de establecer vínculos comerciales y
el canciller invito a Mujica a conocer su país.

clic Lea tambien: “La estatua azerí que causa controversia en Mexico”
“Simpatizantes de la causa armenia” En septiembre de 2011, el canciller
Almagro había dicho: “Somos extremadamente simpatizantes de la causa
armenia”. Tambien había asegurado: “entendemos que Nagorno Karabaj
esta íntimamente ligado a Armenia”. Y, finalmente, que “su ligazon
con Armenia en el futuro es el mejor camino para Nagorno Karabaj”.

El caso Safarov

En 2004 el militar azerí Ramil Safarov mato a hachazos a un hombre
armenio en Hungría, durante un curso de idiomas patrocinado por la
Organizacion del Tratado del Atlantico Norte.

Estuvo en prision en el país europeo hasta fines de agosto de 2012,
cuando fue extraditado a Azerbaiyan, donde se esperaba que terminara
de cumplir su condena a cadena perpetua.

Pero en vez de eso fue perdonado, ascendido y se le dio un apartamento
para vivir. Eso llevo a que el Parlamento armenio suspendio formalmente
sus lazos con su contraparte húngara.

Fue un golpe para la posicion azerí frente a la comunidad internacional
y los armenios quieren aprovechar esta situacion.

OTAN preocupada por decision de Azerbaiyan de indultar a un militar
BBC Mundo intento sin exito comunicarse con Almagro o algún otro
alto funcionario de la Cancillería para preguntarle si efectivamente
Uruguay tenía intenciones de reconocer la independencia de la region
separatista.

Por lo pronto, uno de los miembros de la delegacion uruguaya que
visito Karabaj, Ruben Martínez Huelmo dijo que es “en teoría” posible,
pero que debe avanzarse paso a paso.

Otro grano de arena Si Uruguay llegara a dar ese paso decisivo,
sumaría un grano de arena mas a una montaña de elementos conflictivos.

Analistas especializados en la region aseguran que la zona se encuentra
en una situacion de alta tension, reavivada por el reciente caso de un
azerí condenado a cadena perpetua por matar a un armenio en Hungría,
quien fue perdonado tras ser extraditado a Azerbaiyan (ver recuadro).

En este contexto, un reconocimiento de la independencia de Nagorno
Karabaj por parte de Uruguay alimentaría suspicacias en una delicada
situacion.

De todos modos, los expertos creen que no conseguiría romper el
delicado equilibrio regional. Hay demasiado en juego, y un nuevo
conflicto armado podría extenderse a otros países de la region
y comprometer oleoductos azeríes (cuya economía tiene una fuerte
dependencia del petroleo) y la infraestructura de transporte la zona,
entre ellas las vías sobre las que se llevan provisiones a las fuerzas
de Estados Unidos y la Organizacion del Tratado del Atlantico Norte
en Afganistan.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/mundo/noticias/2012/11/121117_uruguay_nagorno_karabaj_armenia_azerbaiyan_nc.shtml

The Poems By The Prominent Canadian-Armenian Political Scientist Are

THE POEMS BY THE PROMINENT CANADIAN-ARMENIAN POLITICAL SCIENTIST ARE INTRODUCED IN THE BOOK “RETURN TO ARMENIA”

14:40, 21 November, 2012

YEREVAN, NOVEMEBR 21, ARMENPRESS. The Embassy of the Republic
of Armenia to Canada organized the presentation of the bilingual
collection of poems by prominent Canadian-Armenian political scientist
and poet Professor Alan Whitehorn.

A number of representatives from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of
Canada and the Ministry of Defense of Canada attended the presentation
of this book. The hall of the Embassy of the Republic of Armenia
to Canada have been full with a plenary of ambassadors, publishers,
public organizations, and the heads of the structures of the Armenian
community of Canada.

The Ambassador of the Republic of Armenia in Canada Armen Yeganyan
made opening remarks.

Alan Whitehorn is a former professor of the Royal Military College
of Canada and author of a number of books. The majority of the poems
of Prof. Whitehorn is dedicated to the Armenian Genocide and his love
and yearning for the motherland. “Return to Armenia” by Alan Whitehorn
is dedicated to the same topics. This is the first book by Whitehorn,
which is introduced in the Armenian language as well.

Former Artsakh Pm – Next Five Years Crucial For Karabakh

FORMER ARTSAKH PM – NEXT FIVE YEARS CRUCIAL FOR KARABAKH
Sona Avagyan

HETQ
14:08, November 21, 2012

Former Artsakh Prime Minister Arman Melikyan said that Baku will pull
out all the stops to resolve the Karabakh issue in its favor within
the next five years.

Melikyan says that Azerbaijan’s oil reserves will start getting
depleted by then.

The analyst, who hinted at a possible presidential run next year
inArmenia, said Yerevan must choose sides in terms of international
allies given that the region faces potentially huge instability risks.

Melikyan pointed to Russia, Iran and partiallyTurkey as nations to
which Armenia must look as bastions of stability.

Heritage Party Leader Does Not Rule Out Support For "Single Candidat

HERITAGE PARTY LEADER DOES NOT RULE OUT SUPPORT FOR “SINGLE CANDIDATE” IN 2013 ELECTION

POLITICS | 21.11.12 | 13:14

Raffi Hovannisian, the founder and leader of the opposition Heritage
party, does not rule out support for a single opposition candidate who,
he says, would bring “victory” in next year’s presidential election.

At a press conference on Wednesday, Hovannisian, who earlier this
month announced his intention to run for president in February,
warned, however, that he would reject any pretence and eyewash that
would eventually end up in a “deal”.

Hovannisian’s remarks came amid continuing consultations among mostly
opposition political forces launched last week around a possible
common platform with which to challenge President Serzh Sargsyan in
the upcoming election.

Hovannisian’s Heritage party members last week also met with
representatives of the Prosperous Armenia Party that initiated the
consultations on the basis of two main issues – transforming Armenia
into a parliamentary republic by 2018 and scrapping elections to
the National Assembly from single-seat mandates and passing to an
all-party list ballot.

At the press conference on Wednesday Hovannisian also announced that he
was leaving for Baku later that day to take part in an international
conference of Asian political parties. He said that organizers of the
event in Azerbaijan had promised equal conditions for expression and
security to him.

http://www.armenianow.com/news/politics/41292/armenia_raffi_hovannisian_opposition_candidate

The Government Is Looking Forward To The Decision Of Flora Martirosy

THE GOVERNMENT IS LOOKING FORWARD TO THE DECISION OF FLORA MARTIROSYAN’S FAMILY REGARDING THE PLACE OF THE FUNERALS

12:51, 21 November, 2012

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 21, ARMENPRESS. Whether the civil funerals and
burial of People’s Artist of Armenia Flora Martirosyan will be
held in Armenia or not has not been clarified yet. The Department
of Public Relations of the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of
Armenia informed “Armenpress” about this. The Government is looking
forward to the decision of the beloved singer for the preparation
of all necessary documents for repatriation. After the positive
answer of Flora Martirosyan’s family members in accordance with the
decision of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia a special
committee will be created for the organization of the civil funerals
and burial in Armenia. The Chief Consul of the Republic of Armenia in
Los Angeles is seeing to the preparation of all necessary documents
and the organization of the procedures.

People’s Artist of the Republic of Armenia Flora Martirosyan passed
away. The cause of death was the difficulties, which arose after her
gall-bladder was operated on.

Flora Martirosyan was the founder of the International Musical
School after Komitas, “Artists for Peace” Charity Organization and
the initiator of the cultural movement “Never Again”.

L’etudiante Franco-Kurde Accusee De Terrorisme Reste En Turquie

L’ETUDIANTE FRANCO-KURDE ACCUSEE DE TERRORISME RESTE EN TURQUIE
Stephane

armenews.com
mercredi 21 novembre 2012

Un tribunal turc a confirme lundi l’interdiction de quitter la
Turquie imposee a l’etudiante franco-kurde Sevim Sevimli, accusee
d’avoir entretenu des liens avec un groupe d’extreme-gauche interdit,
et fixe la prochaine audience de son procès au 16 janvier.

A l’issue de deux heures de debats, la cour criminelle de Bursa
(nord-ouest) a une nouvelle fois rejete la demande de levee du
contrôle judiciaire de la jeune femme, qui risque une peine maximale
de trente-deux ans de prison, contre les requisitions du procureur.

“Permettez-lui de poursuivre ses etudes en France et de revenir en
Turquie pour les prochaines audiences”, a demande au president de la
cour son avocat, Me Inayet Aksu, “si vous la maintenez sous contrôle
judiciaire, elle perd un droit fondamental pour un jeune, le droit
a l’education”.

Sevim Sevimli, qui nie les accusations portees contre elles, n’a fait
aucun commentaire a sa sortie du tribunal.

Devant la presse, Me Aksu a denonce la decision “dure, exageree”
du tribunal. “A mon avis, cette decision n’etait pas necessaire”,
a commente l’avocat, “il y a des centaines de dossiers similaires en
Turquie dont les accuses sont tous libres de leurs mouvements”.

“J’esperais une autre appreciation de ce dossier”, a pour sa part
reagi, decu, le president de l’universite de Lyon 2, Jean-Luc Mayaud,
où Sevim Sevimli suivait ses etudes avant de venir en Turquie.

“Ce que j’ai pu entendre, c’est que les faits sont très fragiles,
qu’il y a une discordance entre ce que dit la loi turque et ce qu’en
disent les services de securite”, a poursuivi M. Mayaud.

“Je suis decu mais je ne lâche pas facilement. C’est une etudiante
de chez moi et je viendrai la chercher”, a-t-il assure, “chez moi,
quand il y a un doute, ca profite a l’accuse”.

Outre le president de l’universite de Lyon 2, plusieurs avocats du
barreau de Lyon et le consul general de France a Istanbul Herve Magro
etaient presents a l’audience.

Arrivee de Lyon a Eskisehir (nord-ouest de la Turquie) en debut
d’annee dans le cadre du programme d’echanges universitaires europeen
Erasmus, la jeune femme a ete arretee le 10 mai et placee en detention
provisoire pendant trois mois, avant d’etre remise en liberte sous
contrôle judiciaire.

L’etudiante est accusee d’appartenir a une organisation d’extreme
gauche interdite, le Parti/Front revolutionnaire de liberation du
peuple (DHKP-C).

A l’origine de nombreuses actions violentes en Turquie depuis la fin
des annees 1970, le DHKP-C a revendique le 11 septembre un attentat
suicide qui a coûte la vie a un policier a Istanbul. Il figure sur
la liste des organisations classees terroristes par les Etats-Unis
et l’Union europeenne.

L’accusation reproche a l’etudiante d’avoir diffuse des publications
du mouvement, pourtant en vente libre en Turquie, ou d’avoir participe
a des reunions ou des manifestations autorisees.

A l’audience de lundi, l’avocat de Sevim Sevimli a une nouvelle
fois denonce ces accusations “vraiment exagerees”. “Sa seule faute,
c’est d’etre arrivee en Turquie comme une etudiante avec des idees
de gauche. La liberte d’opinion existe en Turquie, non ?”, a lance
Me Aksu au president de la cour.

mercredi 21 novembre 2012, Stephane ©armenews.com

Robert Kotcharian Prend Ses Distances De L’Initiative D’Armenie Pros

ROBERT KOTCHARIAN PREND SES DISTANCES DE L’INITIATIVE D’ARMENIE PROSPERE ET CRITIQUE EXPLICITEMENT LE GOUVERNEMENT ACTUEL
Stephane

armenews.com
mercredi 21 novembre 2012

Dans un entretien a son site officieux , Robert Kotcharian
commente la recente proposition d’Armenie prospère de proceder a des
reformes constitutionnelles pour passer a un système parlementaire.

Rappelons que le parti Republicain a brusquement reagi aux appels
d’Armenie prospère, son porte-parole Edouard Charmazanov ayant
declare que ” les gens qui n’ont aucune chance d’arriver au pouvoir
en leur propre nom ” sont derrière l’appui ” soudain ” dont beneficie
Armenie prospère. Plusieurs commentateurs y avaient vu une allusion a
Robert Kotcharian. Dans son entretien, celui-ci refute tout soutien
au système parlementaire de gouvernance et relève que si tel etait le
cas l’Armenie serait devenu un Etat parlementaire suite au referendum
constitutionnel de 2005, dont il etait l’initiateur. Il relève
que l’on peut diriger le pays avec sagesse ou avec incompetence
depuis le bureau de President, comme depuis celui de PM, ce dont la
pratique internationale donne bien des exemples. Il rappelle que les
reformes constitutionnelles de 2005 avaient sensiblement augmente les
competences du Gouvernement. ” On se demande pourquoi dans les faits
son rôle a sensiblement diminue …La proposition d’Armenie prospère
est plutôt une reaction au desequilibre evident entre les pouvoirs
executif et parlementaire “, a-t-il souligne. Robert Kotcharian relève
par ailleurs qu’il est en faveur de la suppression de l’election
majoritaire de circonscription et regrette de ne pas avoir pu le faire
sous son mandat. L’election majoritaire de circonscription contribue,
selon lui, a la ” feodalisation ” des regions. Enfin, il conseille a
tous ceux qui cherchent son ” ombre ” partout d’ouvrir les yeux et
de constater qu’Armenie prospère a pu creer une equipe capable de
former son agenda politique independamment…

Reagissant aux propos du deuxième President, Edouard Charmazanov,
porte-parole du parti Republicain, a dit respecter, mais ne pas
partager son avis, notamment en ce qui concerne la ” feodalisation ”
des regions. Il rappelle que le Code electoral actuel a ete adopte par
les trois forces de l’ancienne coalition gouvernementale a laquelle
Armenie prospère etait associe et que ce Code a permis de tenir les
meilleures elections de l’histoire de l’Armenie independante.

Extrait de la revue de presse de l’Ambassade de France en Armenie en
date du 14 novembre 2012

mercredi 21 novembre 2012, Stephane ©armenews.com

www.2rd.am