Russian-Armenian Rapprochement Will Continue After Sargsyan Election

RUSSIAN-ARMENIAN RAPPROCHEMENT WILL CONTINUE AFTER SARGSYAN ELECTION – PUTIN

Interfax, Russia
Feb 20 2013

President Vladimir Putin has congratulated Serzh Sargsyan by telephone
on his election as Armenia’s president, the Kremlin press service
reported on Tuesday.

Putin and Sargsyan agreed to continue personal contacts.

Putin has also sent a congratulatory message to Sargsyan.

The outcome of the presidential election demonstrates Sargsyan’s
high standing in Armenia, and strong support for his socioeconomic
and foreign-policy course, Putin wrote.

Russia and Armenia will work together to broaden bilateral relations
for the benefit of the two nations, Putin said.

State Department Statement On Armenian Presidential Elections

STATE DEPARTMENT STATEMENT ON ARMENIAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

State Department Documents and Publications
February 20, 2013

Armenian Presidential Elections
Press Statement
Victoria Nuland
Department Spokesperson, Office of the Spokesperson
Washington, DC
February 20, 2013

The United States congratulates the people of Armenia on their February
18 presidential elections, which were judged by international observers
to be generally well-administered and characterized by a respect for
fundamental freedoms, including those of assembly and expression. The
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s Office for
Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR) found that the
media fulfilled its legal obligation to provide balanced coverage,
and that all contestants made use of their free air time.

We share, however, OSCE/ODIHR’s concerns about a lack of impartiality
on the part of the public administration and the misuse of
administrative resources that resulted in a blurred distinction
between the activities of the state and those of the ruling party,
both during the pre-election period and on Election Day. We agree
with the findings that while Election Day was calm and orderly, it
was marked by undue interference in the process, mainly by proxies
representing the incumbent, and some serious violations, including
cases of pressure on voters.

The United States will continue to monitor the findings of
international and domestic election observers, as well as the
adjudication of election grievances during the post-election period.

We urge law enforcement officials to investigate and to take
appropriate action in response to credible reporting of election
violations, and we call on all parties to remain calm in this
post-election period and to exercise restraint in their actions.

PRN: 2013/0193

Election 2013: Armenian President’S Second-Term Win Disputed By Oppo

ELECTION 2013: ARMENIAN PRESIDENT’S SECOND-TERM WIN DISPUTED BY OPPOSITION CANDIDATE

Global Insight
February 20, 2013

by Lilit Gevorgyan

Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan secured a first round victory
in the 18 February presidential election, but his main opponent,
Raffi Hovannisian, has refused to concede defeat, claiming that the
election results were rigged.

People’s will

The victory of the Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan on 18 February
came as no surprise, as prior to the election most of the opinion
polls were pointing at a clear lead for the incumbent, who is now set
to remain in office for another five years. According to the Armenian
Central Elections Commission, 60% of the former Soviet republic’s
voters took part in the polls. President Serzh Sargsyan, representing
the ruling Republican Party, gained an outright victory with 58.64% of
the votes. However, his key opponent and the leader of Heritage Party,
Raffi Hovannisian, came in second with an impressive 36.75% of the
total votes. The Armenian former prime minister Hrant Bagratyan gained
only 2.15%, followed by the leader of the National Self-Determination
Party, Paruyr Hayrikyan, who gained 1.23%. Hayrikyan’s votes are
relatively low, despite suggestions that the mysterious attempt on
his life on 31 January by unknown assailants may have helped boost
his support.

The veteran politician and Soviet era dissident gave contradictory
remarks following the assassination attempt as he launched a
thinly-veiled attack on Russia’s “imperial intentions”, but then
retracted his comments. The other three presidential candidates,
including Vardan Sedrakyan, the editor-in-chief of Radio Hye, who has
been on hunger strike in the past few weeks, all failed to gain more
than 1% of the vote.

Sargsyan was quick to address his campaign leaders and voters after
it became clear that he had won the race. He said that people had
expressed their will and made the right choice by backing him.

However, US-born Hovannisian denounced his victory. At a peaceful
opposition demonstration in Yerevan’s iconic Liberty Square, he urged
Sargsyan to admit that “the vote was not fair and the (official)
results do not reflect the people’s will”. Hovannisian’s spokesperson
Hovsep Khurshudyan said at a press conference that “these were shameful
elections with a huge number of violations.” In particular, the
opposition claims that despite a pledge by the authorities to ensure
that no so-called “carousel voting” (a practice which allows multiple
voting), would take place, this was not the case. They alleged that the
quickly disappearing ink used to mark passports, and already used for
voting, was part of the scheme. Western observers from the Organisation
for Security and Cooperation (OSCE) also noted the problem.

However, these allegations have been dismissed by the authorities,
which argue that the opposition has to accept “the people’s will”.

Sargsyan came to power in 2008 after being backed by former president
Robert Kocharian. However, his first term election was marred by
rare violent clashes between the opposition and riot police that
left at least 10 people dead on 1 March 2008. Both the opposition
and the government ensured that the latest election was conducted
in a peaceful manner, as noted by international observers. Avoiding
political violence is something that both the opposition and the
authorities agree on, as any outbreaks of unrest will be highly
damaging for Armenia’s efforts to pursue EU integration. Speaking at
the post-vote opposition rally, Hovannisian also pledged to pursue
his goal of a vote recount only through peaceful means, stating that
his first step would be appealing to Armenia’s Constitutional Court
to overturn the election results.

Observers’ dilemma

Clear frustration with the election results by many Armenian voters
has also put pressure on international observers, particularly from the
OSCE. Thus, shortly after the polling stations were closed, opposition
activists rallied to stop international monitors from giving their
preliminary conclusions, urging them to pay closer attention to
electoral violations. Nonetheless, the OSCE has proceeded with the
report saying that the vote on 18 February was a step forward in terms
of freedom of expression and organisation. However, Tonino Picula,
the head of the OSCE mission said: “This election showed improvement,
but lacked genuine competition,” adding “Competition is critical if
Armenia is going to live up to the aspirations of its people for a
vibrant and engaging democracy.”

The US State Department spokesperson, Victoria Nuland, as customary,
echoed the OSCE report by saying “We support the conclusions…that
the elections were generally well administered and characterised by
a respect for fundamental freedoms, including those of assembly and
expression.” Meanwhile, the Russian president Vladimir Putin was the
first to congratulate Sargsyan on his re-election.

Opposition supporters gather for a rally in Yerevan, Armenia, 17
March 2011.

Ref #: PA.10384666

The OSCE report also highlighted the problems with carousel voting,
and urged investigations into the opposition’s allegations. Picula also
highlighted that the voters expressed their apathy with a relatively
low turnout. Speaking of a lack of real competition, the head of
the OSCE mission said that it was concerned with the fact that major
political forces decided to effectively abstain from the political
race and not field any candidates.

The international monitors have been under pressure from Armenian
opposition parties to take a more critical stance on the elections.

The opposition’s attempt to disrupt the announcement of the
preliminary findings, and its subsequent disappointment with the
relatively positive report, is also likely to affect the importance
that grass-roots activists in particular attach to the international
monitors’ opinion in future.

Outlook and implications

The opposition, led by Raffi Hovannisian , stands little chance of
ousting Sargsyan unless Hovannisian manages to rise from his current
rank of a small party boss and become a national leader to inspire a
popular uprising. To his disadvantage, the major Armenian opposition
parties and blocs, including the Armenian National Congress (HAK) led
by the former president Levon Ter-Petrosyan, or millionaire politician
Gagik Tsarukyan of the Prosperous Armenia party, have been reluctant
to join Hovannisian thus far. The election campaign showed that
Sargsyan, much like many of his predecessors, had the advantage of
using administrative resources to help secure his victory. However,
the greatest aid to his victory came from the disunity of the
opposition parties. This reluctance has given rise to speculation
among the Armenian electorate that despite the facade, most of these
political forces remain part of the same set up. While Hovannisian ,
a US-born lawyer and Armenian former foreign minister, has all the
credentials to set him apart from the other political forces, he has
yet to prove his ability to capitalise on the significant vote that
he gained on 18 February. Hovannisian has effectively captured the
“no” vote of disenchanted urban professionals, and has also secured
votes from rural regions, including many in the south – which used
to be Sargsyan’s electoral stronghold.

For Hovannisian to succeed, he needs to overcome strong electoral
apathy, as many voters see Sargsyan’s rule for the next five years
as inevitable, particularly given the relatively strong support from
both from Russia and the EU.

Poland Will Not Sign Eastern Partnership Project For 2013 Until Talk

POLAND WILL NOT SIGN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP PROJECT FOR 2013 UNTIL TALKS WITH MOLDOVA, AZERBAIJAN AND ARMENIA ARE OVER

ARMINFO
Thursday, February 21, 17:47

Poland is not going to put its signature under Eastern Partnership’s
new project for 2013 until the talks with Moldova, Azerbaijan and
Armenia are completed, Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said
at a press conference in Gdansk following the meeting of the foreign
ministers of 12 European countries.

According to Xinhua news agency, the Polish minister said that 1.5 bln
EUR investments are needed to implement the project. If the agreement
on Eastern Partnership is signed in 2013, possible controversy may
arise in the future.

The Swedish foreign minister, in turn, said that the work on the
Eastern Partnership project is long and complicated and may be done
by means of stage-by-stage measures only.

The Eastern Partnership (EaP) is a project initiated by Poland and a
subsequent proposal was prepared in cooperation with Sweden. It was
presented by the foreign minister of Poland and Sweden at the EU’s
General Affairs and External Relations Council in Brussels on 26 May
2008. The Eastern Partnership was inaugurated by the European Union
in Prague on 7 May 2009. The first meeting of foreign ministers in
the framework of the Eastern Partnership was held on 8 December 2009
in Brussels. The Eastern Partnership is a forum aiming to improve the
political and economic trade-relations of the six Post-Soviet states
of “strategic importance” – Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia,
Moldova, Ukraine with the European Union.

Ashotyan: Staff Reshuffle Expected In Armenia’s Governing Institutio

ASHOTYAN: STAFF RESHUFFLE EXPECTED IN ARMENIA’S GOVERNING INSTITUTIONS

YEREVAN, February 21. /ARKA/. Certain changes will be made in the
staff of Armenia’s governing institutions, Armen Ashotyan, education
and science minister and deputy chairman of the ruling Republican
Party of Armenia, told journalists on Thursday.

He was quoted by Novosti-Armeniaas saying that this staff reshuffle
will particularly be made in those agencies which are shaped due to
presidential elections.

Asked about possible replacement of the education minister himself
with another, he advised journalists not to worry about him, since
Armenia has more pressing problems today.

Under the Armenian Constitution, the president accepts the government’s
resignation in 50 days after the election and appoints a new prime
minister proposed by the majority of the National Assembly in ten
days after accepting the resignation.

The Cabinet is shaped in 20 days after the prime minister appointment.

According to the preliminary results of the poll released by the
Central Election Commission, Serzh Sargsyan, the incumbent president,
was reelected by 861,378 voters (58.64%) and Raffi Hovannisian won
539,674 votes (36.74%). -0-

Georgia farms face Indian ‘invasion’

Georgia farms face Indian ‘invasion’

Thousands of Punjabi farmers have bought land in distant Georgia lured
by cheap prices, angering some locals.

Al Jazeera
21 Feb 2013

Felix Gaedtke and Gayatri Parameswaran

Samgori, Georgia – Larisa Maisuradze was astonished to see the sudden
proliferation of foreigners driving farm machinery near her sleepy
village, about 25 kilometres south of the Georgian capital, Tbilisi.

Her home is sandwiched between the lone street that runs through the
small village of Samgori on one side, and a vast tract of
underutilised farmland on the other.

“I didn’t know what was going on, I was so surprised,” Maisuradze
recounted on a recent afternoon. “There were all these Indian farmers
driving tractors here.”

Maisuradze said the unusual scene from that day months ago are etched
in her memory, as she never imagined she’d have so many neighbours
from a land so far away.

The Indians Maisuradze witnessed that day were the first wave of many
who have come to Georgia to farm land in the Caucasus region in recent
months.

The government is seeking to bolster domestic agricultural production
to help Georgia become more food self-sufficient. Most Georgians farm
small plots of land for sustenance only, not enough for commercial
production.
Agricultural production has plummeted from 12.8 percent of the
country’s GDP in 2006 to just 8.3 percent at present.

Georgia has stepped up the immigration of people with agricultural
know-how and farmland sales to foreigners, as the country’s abundant
and agriculturally potent conditions have not been properly utilised
by local farmers.

Many Georgians, however, view the influx of foreign farmers as an
“invasion”. Estimates suggest thousands of Indian farmers – mostly
from the northern state of Punjab – have immigrated since 2012.

Maisuradze admits it was difficult to develop relationships with the
new arrivals, but it didn’t take her long to realise they were “nice
people”.

“There’s no drinking water in the fields, so they always come here to
drink water. I give them water and in return they always bring me some
vegetables from the farm – tomatoes or potatoes or something
else. They are nice people, very hardworking and calm,” said
Maisuradze.

Harvesting opportunity

Ramandeep Singh Palhan, a Sikh farmer from Punjab, owns nearly 30
hectares (74 acres) of farmland that stretches beyond Maisuradze’s
home.

One of the reasons Palhan chose Georgia is because land here is so
inexpensive.

“I can buy a hectare of land for US$1,000-$1,500. I can’t imagine
finding something that cheap in Punjab,” the bearded farmer said. “You
can’t compare the prices. I sold one hectare of my land in Punjab and
with that money I could buy 200 hectares [495 acres] of land in
Georgia.”

Palhan grows wheat, potatoes, garlic, onion and a variety of other
crops. The 42-year-old recently walked through a fresh morning mist
that hung over his fields, and bent down to grab a handful of dirt.

“Feel the texture of the soil, it’s great. It’s very suitable for the
crops we’d like to grow. It’s not very different from the soil we have
back home,” he said.

Stroking his turban he added jokingly: “I am a true Punjabi at
heart. We have this inherent hunger for buying more and more
land. There’s not one Punjabi who is satisfied with the land he owns.”

Though he is trying to adapt to Georgian life, Palhan faces some
hurdles. The culture and language are “different”, and the food is
“not spicy”.

“Of course, I miss my family and my friends but most of all makki di
roti aur sarso da saag [corn bread and mustard spiced curry],” he said
longingly.

Palhan found out about agricultural investment opportunities in
Georgia through a newspaper advertisement by an immigration agency.

Posters welcoming immigrants to Georgia are stuck on the walls of
Crown Immigration Consultancy Services office on the top floor of a
shopping mall in a Tbilisi suburb.

The agency has facilitated the migration of about 2,000 farmers since
last year, according to Dharamjit Singh Saini, executive director of
the firm, who also hails from Punjab.

Punjabi farmers find Georgia attractive because of the lack of red
tape, said Saini. “Everything is transparent … and there’s no
corruption here – unlike India. If all goes well, there will be more
[Indians] to come.”

The agency is also planning to open a Georgian-Russian-language school
in Jalandhar in Punjab state to prepare farmers before they head to
their new home.

Unhappy Georgians

Not everyone is content with recent developments. Georgian farmers
with small and medium-sized farms complain while the government
facilitates foreign investment in agriculture, it doesn’t encourage
local farmers.

Raul Babunashvili is the founder of the Georgian Farmers’ Union. On a
weekday the union’s office in Tbilisi is buzzing with activity. Sacks
of seed are brought in to the storage hall, and farming equipment is
briskly bought and sold.

Babunashvili, 71, sits in a quiet office far from all the
distraction. “In the past, the government neglected agriculture.

It wasn’t a priority for them. That made the farmers so broke that
they have no choice but to sell their lands at a pittance to
foreigners – and here let me specifically mention the Indian farmers.”

The union founder admitted the inadequacies of local agriculturalists,
but said the government should focus on Georgians instead of
foreigners to boost food production.

“Georgian farmers lack the know-how and skills. We don’t have the
resources to invest in building infrastructure. That’s why Georgian
farmers are lagging behind, while Indians come and literally grab
their land for the cheapest prices.”

Babunashvili said he doesn’t have any statistics on how much land
Indian farmers own in Georgia, but he wants immediate government
action to halt foreigners from buying up prime agricultural areas.

“We must stop this invasion of land-buyers from India. I call it
invasion because they are coming in massive numbers,” said
Babunashvili.

Paying heed to ‘black sheep’

In an interview, Agriculture Minister David Kirvalidze was asked
whether the government was ignoring the needs of Georgian farmers.

Kirvalidze said they were not made a priority by past governments, but
added his administration was paying attention to the “black sheep in
the family” – Georgia’s agriculture sector – after it came to power in
October 2012.

“We are trying to bring the rural Georgian population back to life,
back to business. We are making huge investments, you will see the
results in the coming months. I ask you to return after seven-eight
months,” Kirvalidze said.

The government under Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili has increased
funding for agriculture by more than 60 percent from the previous
budget, he noted. And a fund worth about US$600m was also created in
January to provide credit for small farmers.

Georgia imports 80 percent of its packaged food products, a problem
that negatively affects the economy. “It’s nonsense, real nonsense,”
Kirvalidze said. “Georgian farmers have very good natural resources:
soil, water and climate.”

Although Kirvalidze stressed improving conditions for Georgian
farmers, he doesn’t shun foreigners. “Any kind of investment, foreign,
local or domestic – we welcome all. Every single investor who is
looking to build up long-term relationships with us is welcome,” he
said.

Ranjot Singh – who owns 150 hectares of farmland land in Georgia – saw
yet another business opportunity with the wave of Punjabi immigrants.

“We are running an inexpensive hotel and canteen for the new
arrivals. When they arrive, they can come here and feel at home. They
can speak Punjabi and eat Punjabi food and get to know other Punjabis
in Tbilisi,” Singh said.

But for Singh, Georgia doesn’t feel like home.
“Georgians are very nice people. But we are very different from
them. The culture is different, even the religion is different. But
there’s a business opportunity here.”

Andreas Ghukasyan: Republican Party Of Armenia Is At The End Of Its

ANDREAS GHUKASYAN: REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ARMENIA IS AT THE END OF ITS RESOURCES TO RULE THE COUNTRY LEGITIMATELY

ARMINFO
Thursday, February 21, 17:30

The Feb 18 2013 presidential election has once again demonstrated
that the country’s authorities are unable to hold honest and
transparent elections and it has become clear that the Republican
Party of Armenia (RPA) is at the end of its own resources to rule
the country legitimately, presidential candidate Andreas Ghukasyan
says in his statement.

“During the voting half a million of voters turned against the ruling
regime. It’s time for the people to decide the political future of the
country themselves. The country’s citizens and the political forces
may set up a national Council that will assume the responsibility to
hold the second round of honest and transparent elections. For the
welfare of our motherland, I call on the citizens to join efforts and
not to allow anybody to break the people’s striving for democratic
and lawful Armenia”, Ghukasyan says in his statement.

To note, according to the preliminary results of the Feb 18 election,
the incumbent President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan obtained 58.64%
(861,160 votes), the leader of Heritage Party Raffi Hovannisian –
36.75% (539,672), Hrant Bagratyan – 2.15%, Paruyr Hayrikyan – 1.23%,
Andreas Ghukasyan – 0.57%, Vardan Sedrakyan – 0.42%, Arman Melikyan –
0.24%. The voter turnout was 1,518,407 or 60.05% of the total number
of voters of the republic.

Dodge Collection Acquired by the ALMA

Armenian Library and Museum of America
Caroline Ly- Program and Administrative Manager
65 Main Street, Watertown MA 02472
Web:
Tel: 617-926-2562 ext. 4
Fax: 617-926-0175
Facebook:
Follow us on Twitter –

ALMA Acquires Paintings by Armenian Artists
>From the Dodge Collection of Soviet Art

Watertown, Mass.- February 21, 2013 – The last three decades of the
Soviet
Union witnessed a tremendously rich and productive art movement that
stands as a stirring example of the individual’s ability to achieve
self-expression despite the oppressive constraints of a totalitarian
state.
Remarkably, it was due largely to the concentrated
efforts
of one man, Professor Norton T. Dodge, that world attention was
attracted to the movement, support was provided to the artists, and a
huge collection
of the resulting art work was established in the United States.
The Armenian Library and Museum of America is fortunate to
have acquired eight paintings by Armenian artists from the collection,
thanks to the generous donation arranged in December by Nancy Ruyle
Dodge, Norton Dodge’s widow.
The works donated to ALMA were painted slightly later,
during the momentous period spanning the period from the last years of
the Soviet Union to the early years of the Armenian Republic, from
1988 to 2005. The artists represented are Armen Adikhanian, Felix
Eghiazarian, Vartan Gabrielian, Sarkis Hamalbashian, Ashot Kazarian,
and Samuel Khachikian.
Professor Dodge began to visit the Soviet Union in
1955, soon after Nikita Khrushchev’s rise to power, to conduct
scholarly research in his academic field, Soviet economics. Contact
with one or two of the non-conformist artists there aroused his
interest and led him to explore the movement more comprehensively and
to purchase paintings. This was not easy in the Soviet Union of the
time, when Socialist Realism was the only accepted form of art, and
non-conformist artists had to work clandestinely, making
it difficult for them to earn a living.
Professor Dodge’s crusade to contact these artists without
the knowledge of the authorities and without endangering the artists
themselves, as well as his ingenious means devised to purchase
paintings, many of them very large in size, and ship them to the
United States, makes a fascinating story. It has been described in
publications such as John McPhee’s
New Yorker articles, subsequently expanded into the book titled The
Ransom
of Russian Art (1994).
Though generally categorized as “non-conformist,” the art work
produced during this period was rich and eclectic, encompassing
different historical, philosophical, religious, and national roots and
exhibiting
aspects of Surrealism, Abstract Expressionism, Pop Art, and other
avant-garde movements.
The collection eventually grew to over 20,000 works
representing more than 2,000 artists and is widely considered to be
the largest collection of its kind in the world. Included are works by
artists from throughout the former Soviet Union, including over 1,000
works by more than 100
artists from Armenia.
In 1986 the bulk of the collection was donated to Rutgers University
in New Brunswick, NJ, where it is housed at the Zimmerli Art Museum as
the Norton and Nancy Dodge Collection of Non-Conformist Art from the
Soviet Union. The richly illustrated book, From Gulag to Glasnost,
edited by Norton Dodge and Alla Rosenfeld (1995), provides a
comprehensive description of the collection. Paintings have been
donated also to the Davis Center at Harvard University and to the
Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center.
To amass this large collection, Professor Dodge
depended on several associates, prominent among them the Paris art
dealer Garig Basmadjian, who specialized in the paintings of Armenian
artists. The association continued until one morning in 1989, when
Basmadjian left the Moscow hotel where he had been staying in the
company of two young men, never to be seen again. It has been
suggested that his disappearance was at the hands of the Russian
mafia, or the state security forces (or a combination of the two), but
the case has never been solved.
“We feel extremely fortunate to have these wonderful
paintings at ALMA, in memory of Norton Dodge and celebrating
everything he accomplished for Soviet artists,” commented ALMA Vice
President Barbara Merguerian. “We are proud of our diverse
collections, and these striking works add a valuable new dimension to
our holdings.”
ALMA is making plans to mount an exhibit of the new
acquisitions in September.

The Armenian Library and Museum of America is located at 65 Main
Street in
Watertown MA, 02472.
Contact: [email protected] or 617-926-2562

Become an ALMA Member

http://www.almainc.org
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Armenian-Library-and-Museum-of-America/278876378889211
http://twitter.com/almainc

"Sunrise Over The Lake Van" Screened In Athens

“SUNRISE OVER THE LAKE VAN” SCREENED IN ATHENS

17:17 21.02.2013

The “Sunrise over the Lake Van” was screened at “Microcosmos” Cinema
in Athens thanks to the efforts of the Armenian Embassy in Greece
and the Armenian National Cinema Center. Directed by Artak Igityan
and Vahan Stepanyan, the film participated in the 2012 Peloponnesian
International Film Festival.

The main character of the film is 80-year-old Karapet Pambukchyan,
whose mother miraculously survived the 1915 Armenian Genocide. He tries
to preserve the memory of the lost Motherland in his Americanized
offspring. That’s how he can save the family from mutual alienation
and rift.

The Directorate of the Peloponnesian International Film Festival has
initiated the screening of films of participant countries in different
countries of Greece over the year.

The screening of the Armenian film in Athens was attended by
representatives of the legislative and executive authorities of Greece,
cultural and non-governmental organizations, scholars, journalists,
diplomats, representatives of the Greek Armenian community.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/02/21/sunrise-over-the-lake-van-screened-in-athens/

Thousands Protest In Armenia After President Re-Elected

THOUSANDS PROTEST IN ARMENIA AFTER PRESIDENT RE-ELECTED

21 February, 2013

About 5,000 flag-waving protesters rallied on Wednesday against
Armenian President Serzh Sarksyan’s re-election, saying his victory
was tainted by fraud.

Supporters of Sarksyan’s second-placed rival Raffi Hovannisian filled
Freedom Square in the center of the capital Yerevan to condemn what
they said were uncounted ballots and other violations.

“Are you ready to stay here long?” Hovannisian asked the crowd. “Are
you ready to stay here until victory? I’m ready.”

“The constitution should win over fraud,” he said, raising a first
above his head after kneeling to kiss the national flag.

Many of Hovannisian’s supporters vowed to continue their protests
until Sarksyan quits, but the crowd dispersed quietly after three
hours and there was no violence.

Some protesters said they would gather again in the square on Thursday.

Hovannisian did not make clear whether he would formally challenge the
result of Monday’s election, which showed Sarksyan won 58.6 percent of
votes, far ahead of Hovannisian, a U.S.-born former foreign minister,
on nearly 37 percent.

International observers found an improvement in the conduct of the
election compared to the last presidential vote in 2008 but said the
vote lacked real competition.

Some of Sarksyan’s most popular political rivals did not take part,
saying the vote would be skewed in his favor. Police said they had
received reports of voting irregularities which they were looking into.

Hayrabet Hovannisian, a musician who joined the protest on Wednesday,
said he voted for a different opposition candidate but wanted to show
his anger over the allegations of fraud.

“Today I came here to be together with the people, to return to the
people their stolen votes,” he said.

Foreign governments and investors fret at any hint of violence in
the country of 3.2 million in the South Caucasus because it lies in
a volatile region that carries Caspian oil and natural gas to Europe.

Landlocked Armenia’s relations are tense with neighboring Azerbaijan
over the mountainous enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is inside
Azeri territory but has been controlled by ethnic Armenians since a
war in the 1990s.

After the 2008 election, eight protesters and two police were killed
in clashes. But there was no violence during Monday’s voting.

http://www.financialmirror.com/news-details.php?nid=28922