EDB May Consider Earmarking $100 Mln For Armenia’s North-South Road

EDB MAY CONSIDER EARMARKING $100 MLN FOR ARMENIA’S NORTH-SOUTH ROAD SOON

YEREVAN, June 11. /ARKA/. Allocation of $100 million by the European
Development Bank for construction of North-South highway in Armenia
may be discussed at the end of June, head of EDB Yerevan office Sergey
Ignatov said.

The issue will be discussed at an Anti-crisis fund meeting scheduled
for end of June, he told ARKA.

If the decision is positive, the bank will be waiting for the
feasibility study from the country’s ministry of transport. After the
study results are discussed with the Anti-crisis fund, the project
may be finally approved, Ignatov said.

The EDB’s expert council gave a positive review to the government
application on 100 million dollars for technical surveillance, design
and construction of one of the sections of the North-South highway.

On January 14 2010 Armenia’s government approved the investment
project for construction of North-South road corridor and the
framework agreement between Armenia and the Asian Development Bank
for 500 million dollars.

The construction of the corridor is expected to be completed in 2017.

The road will extend 556 kilometers to the Black Sea and Europe via
Armenia (Meghri-Kapan-Goris-Yerevan-Ashtarak-Giumry-Bavra) and Georgia.

Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) is an international financial
organization established by Russia and Kazakhstan in 2006 to help
develop market economies and boost mutual trade ties in member states.

The bank’s authorized stock is over 1.5bln US dollars. The
member-states are Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia
and Tajikistan.

The bank’s cumulative investment portfolio in Armenia is $109 million
today. -0-

Entrevista con Sergio Markarián

El Espectador, Colombia
8 Jun 2013

Fútbol internacional
Entrevista con Sergio Markarián
`De Colombia me preocupa todo’

El técnico de la selección peruana de fútbol asegura que su equipo se
jugará una verdadera final en Barranquilla. Aún confía en clasificar.

Por: Sergio Farías-* Especial para El Espectador

Sergio Apraham Markarián Abrahamian es un hombre respetuoso que
siempre ha sentido profunda admiración por el fútbol colombiano, en el
que paradójicamente nunca ha trabajado. Se convirtió en técnico en
1976 y ha dirigido en Uruguay, Paraguay, España, Perú, Grecia, México
y Chile. El Mago, como le dicen por su particular virtud de hacer
grandes campañas con equipos modestos, es un estratega de estilo
conservador que prioriza la seguridad defensiva, pero que intenta
sacarles el mayor provecho a las virtudes de sus jugadores.

Sabe lo que es clasificarse a un Mundial. Lo hizo con Paraguay rumbo a
la cita de Corea-Japón 2002. Y aunque ahora la situación al frente de
la selección peruana es diferente, no deja de soñar con volver al
máximo evento futbolístico. `Esto es fútbol y cualquier cosa puede
pasar. Los números indican que hay opciones de pelear un cupo a
Brasil, así que lo haremos’.

Nacido el 1° de noviembre de 1944 en Montevideo, pero de origen
armenio, Markarián no es una persona misteriosa y con su habitual
franqueza confesó que el martes, en el estadio Metropolitano de
Barranquilla, se jugará una verdadera final. Con el triunfo 1-0 sobre
Ecuador en Lima, los peruanos llegan con aire en la camiseta y con la
ilusión intacta de llegar a Brasil.

¿Cómo analiza el juego del martes ante Colombia?
Complicado. Para nosotros es una final, una oportunidad para seguir
vivos e ilusionados. Ellos han logrado hacerse fuertes en su casa y
están pasando por un gran momento. Lo que vamos a hacer es luchar para
acercarnos más a los puestos de clasificación.

La semana pasada ustedes jugaron un amistoso contra Panamá y lo
ganaron 2-1. ¿Era un simulacro de lo que ocurrirá en Barranquilla?
Bueno, es un rival diferente totalmente, pero sí queríamos probar un
poco la respuesta a la temperatura y al ambiente, porque consultamos a
un experto en el tema y nos explicó que el calor en ciudades como
Barranquilla y Puerto Ordaz complica más por la humedad del Caribe. En
Perú no hay ciudades de clima parecido y Panamá era una buena
alternativa, aunque realmente no hizo tanto calor. Hemos trabajado
mucho en el tema de la hidratación y la preparación física para ese
juego, porque habrá mucho desgaste para los muchachos.

¿Qué es lo que más le preocupa del equipo de José Pékerman?
Generalmente evito hablar de los rivales, pero de Colombia me preocupa
todo. Está entre los mejores 10 equipos del mundo. Eso se logra con
buenos futbolistas y un colectivo sólido que saque resultados, eso es
lo que ellos han conseguido.

¿Cómo van a afrontar el partido en el estadio Metropolitano?
Como una final. Tenemos que buscar afuera lo que hemos perdido en
casa, que tampoco ha sido mucho. Si hacemos las cosas con seriedad y
actitud podemos sacar un buen resultado, pero primero que todo tenemos
que sentirnos capaces de lograrlo, como ocurrió ante Ecuador. Sabíamos
que podíamos ganar y salimos con la actitud adecuada para hacerlo.

¿Cómo analiza la eliminatoria hasta el momento?
Es la más pareja del mundo, la más dura. Aquí no hay equipos fáciles.
A nosotros, por ejemplo, ninguna selección nos ha pasado claramente
por encima, aunque hemos tenido pasajes malos, como los primeros 20
minutos en Chile y en Uruguay, que nos han costado caro.

¿Qué partidos destaca de su equipo?
Hicimos unos muy buenos contra Argentina y Chile, jugando así es
difícil que nos ganen. Y ante Ecuador supimos manejar la presión de
necesitar la victoria.

¿Y cuál no le gustó?
Contra Paraguay en Lima, no se jugó bien, pero anímicamente estamos
bien, haberles ganado a Chile y Ecuador significó recuperar la opción
matemática de clasificar y hacer renacer la esperanza en la gente.
Llevan siete partidos invictos, no pierden desde octubre de 2012.
Bueno, eso demuestra que el trabajo a largo plazo va dando resultados,
pero lo único que realmente nos dejaría satisfechos es clasificar al
Mundial.

¿Qué selecciones cree que van a clasificar?
Esto cada vez se aprieta más, porque en dos fechas puedes pasar del
sexto al segundo lugar, o perder posiciones también. Cada partido será
una final para todos. Creo que Argentina ya hizo la tarea y que los
demás seguimos en la carrera.

¿Firmaría un empate en Barranquilla?
Quiero y necesito ganar, pero ya veremos cómo se da el partido.

http://www.elespectador.com/deportes/futbolinternacional/articulo-426714-de-colombia-me-preocupa-todo

Aliyev says his admin alone can get Nagorno-Karabakh back into Azerb

Interfax, Russia
June 8, 2013 Saturday 7:26 PM MSK

Aliyev says his admin alone can get Nagorno-Karabakh back into Azerbaijan

BAKU. June 8

Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev has made assurances that his
administration alone is capable of achieving a solution to the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which has gone into its third decade.

“Among the tasks of the Yeni Azerbaycan [New Azerbaijan] party,
[seeking a solution to] the Armenian-Azeri Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
is, of course, the main task,” Aliyev told a Yeni Azerbaycan congress.

He claimed that the country’s people support his line on the conflict.

“The territorial integrity of Azerbaijan neither is nor will be up for
negotiations. Nagorno-Karabakh is a historic Azeri land. That’s the
way it is today, and that’s the way it will be tomorrow. Azerbaijan
will use any means to restore its sovereignty, its territorial
integrity,” he said.

The president said the four UN Security Council resolutions on
Nagorno-Karabakh and international law are the only acceptable basis
for a settlement.

“No other options are under consideration or are acceptable. And I am
sure that we will solve this problem because our growing domestic
power and military potential and our economic development will
guarantee us victory,” he said.

He claimed that Armenia is heading for a disaster because it is ruled
by a “criminal” government. He predicted that this alleged slide into
an abyss will be accelerating for as long as this government remains
at the helm.

“I am fully confident that this and, on the other hand, our growing
power guarantee that we will restore our territorial integrity. All
that is needed for this is time and an effective policy that is based
on national interests and involves no concessions or compromises. Our
administration alone can do this,” he said.

“It alone can withstand all the pressures, threats and provocations.
In many cases, campaigns against us are based on this conflict, which
is being used to weaken and besmirch Azerbaijan and deal a blow to its
image in order to wrench concessions from us on the Nagorno-Karabakh
issue. This will not go ahead because we are pursuing a just cause,
and the people support our policy,” Aliyev said.
as

The last of the Armenian genocide survivors

Winnipeg Free Press, Canada
June 9 2013

The last of the Armenian genocide survivors

By: Chris Bohjalian

A woman I met last month in southwestern Turkey is going to die,
probably sometime soon. Asiya’s death will not be covered by any news
service, and for all but a few people in her small village of
Chunkush, she will not be missed. Even the relatives who love her will
probably think to themselves, well, she was 98 years old. Or 99. Or,
if she survives until 2015, somewhere in the neighbourhood of a
century. She will have lived a long life.

When I met Asiya in May, her daughter brought me strong Kurdish tea
and fresh strawberries from their yard, and when I return to her
village someday and find that she has indeed passed away, I suspect
I’m going to weep.

Why cry for a woman I met but once, who lived a long life and who
couldn’t understand a word I said? Who spoke only Turkish, a language
in which I know how to say only “please” and “thank you”?

Because Asiya is what some people call a hidden Armenian, and she is
the last surviving Armenian in Chunkush.
Imet her when I was traveling with six Armenian American friends
through a part of Turkey that many Armenians (including me) refer to
as Historic Armenia. We were in a region that today is largely Kurdish
but as recently as 98 years ago was a mixture of Kurds, Turks,
Assyrians and Armenians. We were making a pilgrimage to view the ruins
of Armenian churches and monasteries, the remnants of a culture
obliterated from this corner of the Earth in the Armenian genocide.
During the First World War, 1.5 million Armenians were systematically
annihilated – three out of every four living in the Ottoman Empire.

On our fifth day, we visited Chunkush, where until 1915 there was a
thriving community of 10,000 Armenians. The ruins of the church loom
over you. The town was almost entirely Armenian. Over a few
nightmarish days that summer, Turkish gendarmes and Kurdish chetes –
killing parties – descended on the village and marched almost every
Armenian two hours away to a ravine called Dudan, where they shot,
bayoneted or simply threw them into a chasm of several hundred feet.
One of the gendarmes pulled Asiya’s mother from the line at the edge
of the ravine, however, because he thought she was pretty. He decided
he’d marry her. And so she was spared – one of the very few Armenians
who were saved that summer day in 1915.

My companions and I hadn’t expected to find Asiya when we journeyed to
Chunkush. We simply wanted to see the ruins of the church. Most of the
villagers acknowledged that once upon a time Armenians had lived in
Chunkush, but they were quick to add – whenever we asked what had
happened to them – that at some point they had all “moved away.”

The truth was, they were still there, whatever remained of their bones
deteriorating at the bottom of the Dudan chasm. We didn’t think there
were any living Armenians in the town.

But as we were leaving, a thin fellow in his 60s, with a deeply
weathered face and a ball cap, raced up to our van and banged on the
door. We had been there an hour, and word had spread that Americans
were in town. We had to meet his mother-in-law, he said.

Our Kurdish driver worried that this was the beginning of a nasty
international incident: Seven Americans kidnapped or killed. But the
fellow was desperate, so we agreed to come meet Asiya. My friend
Khatchig Mouradian, editor of the Armenian Weekly in the United
States, speaks Turkish and translated.

I have met survivors of the Armenian genocide before, including my
grandparents. But meeting Asiya was different. She wasn’t in
Washington or Paris or Beirut. She wasn’t a part of the Armenian
diaspora, where we usually find the few remaining survivors of the
genocide. Here was someone whose mother had been at the edge of the
gorge – and who was still living where, more than likely, her
grandparents and her father had been executed. Where her ancestral
culture had been exterminated.

After the massacre, the town of 10,000 Armenians was reinvented as a
town of 10,000 Kurds. Here was someone whose mother had heard the
endless gunshots. The crash of the bodies on the rocks. The wails of
the children.

She and her mother had grown up and grown old, aware of who and what
they were – Armenian – but forced to conform and remain silent. That
was the price of survival in the days after the genocide, and it’s a
custom that, in small villages such as Chunkush, endures today. That
is, perhaps, the very definition of a hidden Armenian.

Whenever we asked Asiya about being Armenian, she would shake her head
ruefully and grow silent. One time her daughter chimed in: “No. We
can’t talk about that.”

Whenever we asked what her mother had told her of the chasm, she would
look down and murmur: “I was too young. I don’t remember.” Sometimes
she would begin a sentence, “My mother said…” but then her voice
would trail off.

At one of those moments when she paused, I took her hand. It was a
reflex, and I had no idea if this was a cultural faux pas. But she
wrapped my fingers in hers; her grip was powerful. She looked at me
from beneath her headdress with eyes that were at once among the
saddest and the strongest I’ve ever seen. I understood instantly why
her son-in-law, a very good man, wanted us to meet her: It was because
she wanted to meet us. She wanted to meet other Armenians.

Today there are but a handful of living survivors of the Armenian
genocide. When the centennial arrives in 2015, there will be fewer
still. I hope that Asiya will be with us, because I plan to return to
Chunkush that year. No one from the village is going to commemorate
the 10,000 who died in that chasm, so it will be up to people like me
to make that effort – and, yes, to embrace the Asiyas of the world who
were there.

Chris Bohjalian is the author of 16 books. His new novel, The Light in
the Ruins, comes out on July 9.
– The Washington Post

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/The-last-of-the-Armenian-genocide-survivors-210613011.html

Spanish Opera Star Caballe Receives Armenia Honor

Spanish Opera Star Caballe Receives Armenia Honor

Montserrat Caballe

© AFP 2013/ Sebastian Willnow / DDP

17:00 09/06/2013

Tags: Bako Sahakyan, Serzh Sargsyan, Montserrat Caballe, Spain,
Azerbaijan, Armenia, Yerevan

YEREVAN, June 9 (RIA Novosti) – Spanish opera singer Montserrat
Caballe who was declared persona non grata in Azerbaijan this week has
received Armenia’s highest honor from the president, the Armenian
leader’s spokesman said on Sunday.

President Serzh Sargsyan gave Caballe the order of honor for
`defending Armenia’s state and national interests, for special
achievements in establishing independence, democracy as well as for
strengthening and developing friendship with the Republic of Armenia
and for a significant contribution to peace building between nations,’
a spokesman said.

`Armenia is an island of peace and love. You have a wonderful country
and people with strong spirits. I will have unforgettable impressions
when I leave Armenia and I am sure that my visit will be continued,’
the singer said as she received the honor.

Baku declared Caballe persona non grata on Thursday, the next day
after she visited Azerbaijan’s separatist region of Nagorno-Karabakh
and met with the self-proclaimed republic’s head, Bako Sahakyan.

Azerbaijan said the trip was `illegal and harmed peaceful resolution
of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.’ Baku sent a special note to Spain’s
Foreign Ministry demanding explanations.

Relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia have been strained for more
than two decades, since the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, a
predominantly ethnic Armenian region, first erupted in 1988. The
region then claimed independence from Azerbaijan to join Armenia.

Over 30,000 people are estimated to have died on both sides between
1988 and 1994, when a ceasefire was agreed. Nagorno-Karabakh has
remained in Armenian control and tensions between Azerbaijan and
Armenia have persisted.

http://en.ria.ru/world/20130609/181587049.html

La compagnie des eaux et des eaux usées a besoin de 1 milliard de do

ARMENIE
La compagnie des eaux et des eaux usées a besoin de 1 milliard de
dollars d’investissement pour améliorer le système d’approvisionnement
en eau

La compagnie des eaux et des eaux usées (Armvodokanal) a besoin
d’environ 1 milliard de $ d’investissement pour améliorer le système
d’approvisionnement en eau a déclaré Vartan Melkonian, le directeur
technique de la société lors d’une conférence nationale sur la gestion
intégrée des eaux urbaines.

« Afin de résoudre les problèmes dans le système de l’eau, en
particulier, améliorer la qualité de l’eau potable au niveau européen,
nous avons besoin de faire environ 1 milliard de $ d’investissements
dans le système » a-t-il dit.

Il a dit qu’un total de 100 millions de dollars a été investi dans le
système depuis 2004, ce qui a permis à la société d’augmenter la durée
moyenne d’approvisionnement en eau de 5h à 16 heures.

« Notre objectif est d’augmenter la durée d’alimentation en eau
pendant une heure chaque année, mais pour ce faire nous avons besoin
de plus de ressources », a déclaré Vartan Melkonian.

Il dit que la conférence permettra aux entreprises du secteur non
seulement d’échanger des idées et des expériences, mais aussi
d’écouter et de discuter des problèmes d’eau potable et d’eaux usées à
travers le pays.

Arevik Hovsepian, présidente de l’ONG « Coopération nationale de l’eau
» a déclaré que le principal problème de l’eau potable en Arménie est
sa qualité.

« Nous n’avons aucun problème avec les sources d’eau, car elles sont
très propres et respectent les normes de l’eau potable, mais l’eau sur
le chemin de la source au consommateur est contaminé. Beaucoup de pays
épure les eaux usées afin de la fournir gratuitement aux agriculteurs
pour l’irrigation. Nous avons également besoin de le faire » a-t-elle
dit.

Elle a également souligné énormes pertes d’eau dans le système,
pouvant atteindre 80 à 85% du débit en raison de la mauvaise gestion
et de tuyaux vétustes.

dimanche 9 juin 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

L’Agonie d’un peuple , rare témoignage d’un rescapé

revue de presse
L’Agonie d’un peuple , rare témoignage d’un rescapé
Le Monde, France

31 mai 2013 vendredi

` L’Agonie d’un peuple `, rare témoignage d’un rescapé, paraît en même
temps qu’une enquête sur les séquelles de la tragédie ; Traces du
génocide arménien

LE MONDE DES LIVRES ; Pg. 7

L’humanité ne peut plus vivre avec, dans sa cave, le cadavre d’un
peuple assassiné. ` Cette phrase, par laquelle Jaurès dénonçait le
massacre d’Arméniens dans l’Empire ottoman, fut prononcée en 1897,
soit dix-huit ans avant l’extermination de près d’un million et demi
d’Arméniens survenue entre avril 1915 et juillet 1916. A l’heure
actuelle, si ce génocide arménien a été reconnu par la France en 2001,
la loi ne punit toujours pas sa négation (en dépit d’un projet de loi
en 2011). Parce que nous manquons de preuves ? Non : à ceux qui
s’interrogent sur les faits, Le Génocide des Arméniens (Odile Jacob,
2006), de Raymond Kévorkian, ou Un acte honteux. Le génocide arménien
et la question de la responsabilité turque (Denoël, 2008, rééd. `
Folio `, 2012) de Taner Akçam (l’un des premiers universitaires turcs
à reconnaître le génocide) apportent toutes les réponses nécessaires.

Les deux ouvrages qui paraissent aujourd’hui ne visent pas à prouver
quoi que ce soit ; ils se situent en deçà ou au-delà des faits
survenus. La parole du témoin précède, en effet, toute recherche
historique. La publication de L’Agonie d’un peuple est exceptionnelle
à plus d’un égard : paru en 1917 dans un journal arménien, ce récit,
qui n’est autre que le premier long témoignage d’un rescapé, n’avait
jamais été traduit. Qui en est l’auteur ? S’agit-il d’Hayg Toroyan,
Arménien originaire d’Alep qui parvint à survivre en se faisant passer
pour un Arabe chrétien grce à l’aide d’un officier allemand (alors que
celui-ci était officiellement allié des Turcs) et qui fut le
spectateur terrifié d’innombrables massacres durant l’année 1915 ? Ou
de Zabel Essayan, grande figure de la littérature arménienne, qui tira
des souvenirs de Toroyan un texte qu’elle signa de son nom ? Cette
question est au coeur de ce que le traducteur et auteur de la
postface, Marc Nichanian, nomme le ` dilemme du témoin `, à savoir cet
écart entre le sujet de l’expérience et le sujet du récit. Les
paradoxes s’accumulent : L’Agonie d’un peuple visait à dénoncer le
crime du gouvernement Jeunes-Turcs ; pourtant, il fut rédigé en
arménien – écrire dans la langue du survivant ou s’adresser à la
conscience universelle, il lui fallut choisir.

Mais le plus étonnant tient peut-être à l’écart entre l’horreur des
scènes décrites et la réaction d’Hayg Toroyan : c’est lui qui dut
prendre soin de l’officier allemand, habité par la volonté de `
témoigner après la guerre de tous ces actes barbares `, mais peu à peu
gagné par la folie – cet officier finira d’ailleurs par se pendre afin
d’échapper au cauchemar !

Politique d’amnésie

Si le témoignage est une parole incarnée se déployant dans le sillage
immédiat de l’extermination, bien avant qu’interviennent les
historiens, la passionnante enquête menée par Laure Marchand et
Guillaume Perrier (qui écrivent sur la Turquie, la première pour Le
Figaro, le second pour Le Monde) porte sur les répercussions
contemporaines de l’événement. La Turquie et le fantôme arménien
s’ouvre sur une rencontre avec la communauté d’exilés installés à
Marseille et s’achève par le portrait de quelques Justes turcs ayant
sauvé la vie d’Arméniens.

Entre les deux se déploie un étonnant tableau de toutes les manières
dont traumatisme, négationnisme d’Etat, et lutte pour préserver la
mémoire se mêlent aujourd’hui en Turquie. D’un côté, l’amnésie
collective longtemps imposée à la société turque, où l’évocation du
génocide restait impensable, au point que certains des tortionnaires
ont été élevés au rang de héros nationaux, que la plupart des citoyens
ignorent l’ampleur des spoliations, et que l’on n’a pas hésité à
élever le mémorial d’Igdir pour commémorer ` le génocide des Turcs par
les Arméniens `… De l’autre, des figures aussi étonnantes qu’Armen
Aroyan, ancien ingénieur vivant en Californie qui a choisi de
redécouvrir ses racines en Turquie, et organise depuis une vingtaine
d’années des circuits sur mesure pour les descendants de rescapés.
Mais aussi Hasan Cemal, journaliste très connu en Turquie, qui comprit
assez tard que son grand-père, Djemal Pacha (l’un des trois pachas du
triumvirat Jeunes-Turcs à la tête de l’Empire ottoman pendant la
première guerre mondiale) était l’un des responsables du génocide, et
qui a publié un ouvrage sur 1915.

L’Etat turc voit arriver avec inquiétude la célébration du centenaire
du génocide, en 2015. Mais l’espoir subsiste : la présence de 100 000
Turcs scandant : ` Nous sommes tous des Arméniens `, le 23 janvier
2007, derrière le cercueil du journaliste Hrant Dink, assassiné par un
nationaliste turc, était un signe. Peut-être la société saura-t-elle
secouer cette politique d’amnésie sur laquelle continue à reposer sa
vie culturelle et politique.

Jean-Louis Jeannelle

L’Agonie d’un peuple, de Hayg Toroyan et Zabel Essayan, traduit de
l’arménien par Marc Nichanian, Classiques Garnier, 212 p., 24 .

La Turquie et le fantôme arménien. Sur les traces du génocide, de
Laure Marchand et Guillaume Perrier, Actes Sud-Solin, 256 p., 23 .

dimanche 9 juin 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=90283

Construction of new republican hospital underway in Stepanakert

Construction of new republican hospital underway in Stepanakert

14:22 08.06.2013

Nagorno-Karabakh

On June 8 President of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic Bako Sahakyan
visited the construction site of new republican hospital being built
in Stepanakert and got acquainted with the construction works on site.

The President stressed the importance of ensuring construction quality
of the health care facility noting the need to preserve deadlines of
putting it into operation.

The President was accompanied by Ministers of Municipal Engineering
and Public Health Karen Shahramanyan and Zoya Lazaryan, Central
Information Department of the Office of the NKR President reported.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/06/08/construction-of-new-republican-hospital-underway-in-stepanakert/

ANKARA: Erdogan’s Character and Great Transformation

Star, Turkey
June 7 2013

Erdogan’s Character and Great Transformation

Commentary by Erdogan’s Aide Yalcin Akdogan

Every government, every politician, every prime minister can
criticize, can make mistakes, can be debated. Menderes, Ozal, Demirel.
They all accomplished great things by securing the support of very
large masses. And they were also exposed to criticism again by very
large masses. The point achieved in Turkey in every field under the
AKP [Justice and Development Party] cannot be compared to any other
period. The transformation effect by Erdogan in order to democratize
the system is again incomparable.

Despite this, there are attempts being made to day to categorize
Erdogan as a “dictator” because of certain styles, approaches and
deeds. I ask those liberal pens who are criticizing Erdogan’s style,
“For God’s sake, is this not bullying? Do those who are inciting
rebellion against Erdogan not wand a democratic Turkey?” The terrorism
that is being inflicted on the conservative masses in the city
centres, the insults being levelled at the AKP’s voting body, the
attacks; what is human about all that? Putting aside the youths, the
environmentalists and the artists who are protesting in Gezi Park,
what on earth are those people who get organized in an instant in
dozens of cities attacking public buildings, torching party buildings
and clearly bent on taking down the government? These are not people
mingling with innocent crowds. They are agitators who keep innocent
people in reserve and who mask them. Those people who are with good
intentions always showing Gezi Park are actually unwittingly
overshadowing a much larger photograph.

There is an attempt afoot to give Erdogan a certain image. Within this
consortium there are people who would give him a lesson, and those who
would destroy him. There are those who do not want him to become
President of the Republic. There are those who want to see the back of
the AKP never to return.

A mindset similar to the one that treated Abdullah Gul becoming
President of the Republic as cause for military coup on 27 April is
emerging today from self-style democrat circles. Erdogan supposedly
should announce he is not going to run for President of the Republic
or there will be civil war in Turkey. You make a lot of fuss about
Erdogan imposing his will, but you are not afraid to make impositions
of your own and dictate terms against the national will.

If you look at the facts you will see that the footsteps heralding
this great conspiracy were the string of weighty insults levelled at
the prime minister by Kemal Kilicdaroglu calling him a “murderer” and
a “terrorist.”

In the wake of this and just one day before the incident one Turk
elder warned about “imposing a way of life.”

It is sad to see certain liberal, democrat and conservative circles
being used with various pretexts as tools for the new model 28 Feb,
which the neo-national front is trying to create.

Those who are saying that the government has completely failed to
understand the reaction of society’s new generation are fighting not
to see the big picture.

International power centres appear to be disturbed by “Erdogan type
leadership.” It is a form of leadership that develops serious
cooperation with the West but which at the same time does not hesitate
to question the West. It is a form of leadership in which friends can
and do say the harshest things. It is a stance that does not turn its
back but which also does not enter orbit as a satellite. The West is
unaccustomed to this stance and this kind of leadership. It is an
attitude that fought the hardest to enter the EU and demonstrated
transformation but which is not shy to shout out the EU’s double
standards and hypocrisy. A country that criticizes the EU’s
resolutions and its decision-making mechanism but which still managed
to get chosen as a temporary member of the UN with great support. An
understanding that treats anti-Semitism as a crime but which is not
going to sign off on Israel’s murders.

What is wanted is for Erdogan to fix all of Turkey’s problems that
have been in place for decades, for him to tackle the Kurds’ issues,
the Armenians’ issues, the Alevis’ issues and the minorities’ issues
but not to deal with the pious masses’ issues.
What is wanted is for Erdogan to make roads, make dams and make
bridges but not to make Imam Hatip High Schools. He can concern
himself with the nation’s garbage, water and parks, but stay out of
culture and art.

He must always embrace everything, take it on the chin, empathize and
absorb everything but he must never criticize, never question, never
be defiant. He must never stray from the sentiments and the demands of
those who did not vote for him, not those who did.

Was the prime minister the same person 10 years ago? Open the
newspaper pages from back then and take a look. There was far more
criticism of him then than there is today. The more the system
normalizes, the more attempts there are to portray the steps being
taken for the pious segment of society as “imposition” “creeping
Islamization” and “neighbourhood pressure” in a bid to stop this.

Some people do not want a prime minister who has a backbone and
self-confidence. They want to create a leader who is under the thumb,
who has complexes, who cannot be defiant, who is afraid of his own
shadow and who always observes the balances. It is because Erdogan
does not fit this mould that Turkey was able to carry out this great
transformation and push back the status quo.
Erdogan’s unbending, unyielding and untainted character does not work
for some people today. If there are any who think, “He has done what
we wanted, now let us crush this character and take him under our
control” they are gravely mistaken. It is this leader, this character
that has brought the democracy energy of the great masses to life.

It is because Erdogan heeded the criticism levelled at him and
responded positively to the people’s sentiments and reactions that he
was able to secure 50 per cent of the national vote for his party.
Today, the criticisms being voiced by friendly columnists will of
course be given due consideration. However, we are not about to sign
off on those who are unhappy not with Erdogan’s style but with his
political presence.

[Translated from Turkish]

Soccer: Malta ends 47-game winless streak in World Cup qualifying wi

WCHS-TV8
June 8 2013

Malta ends 47-game winless streak in World Cup qualifying with 1-0 win
at Armenia

Reported by: Associated Press
Reported: Friday, June 7, 2013 7:23 PM EDT

Malta’s players held hands and danced around in celebration Friday
night after earning the tiny country’s second-ever victory in World
Cup qualifying, 1-0 at Armenia.

Michael Mifsud slotted in the rebound after his first shot was saved
by goalkeeper Roman Berezovski in the eighth minute at Yerevan.

Malta, ranked 156th in the world by FIFA, had been 0-42-5 in World Cup
qualifying since winning 1-0 at Estonia in May 1993. Estonia is ranked
89th.

Malta spent the rest of the match defending, and goalkeeper Justin
Haber made several saves. Mifsud’s goal was Malta’s only shot on
target – it only had one effort off target, for that matter – while
Armenia finished with six on target and 11 off.

http://www.wchstv.com/newsroom/sports/snews/201306072323_24b9fab.shtml