Book: Affectionate Look At Armenia By A Soviet Man Of Letters

AFFECTIONATE LOOK AT ARMENIA BY A SOVIET MAN OF LETTERS

Sunday Business Post
July 28, 2013

BOOK
An Armenian Sketchbook
**By Vasily Grossman**
**MacLehose Press, EUR 15.10**
**Reviewed by Jonathan O’Brien**

…..

The last time that Armenia got into the news with any regularity was
about 25 years ago, when it and Azerbaijan waged a nasty little
conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian enclave on Azeri
territory. The war is long over, but while Azerbaijan has since
elbowed its way into western consciousness with its hosting of the
Eurovision Song Contest, its sponsorship of Atletico Madrid and its
open-door welcoming of Big Oil, its smaller neighbour has languished
in the shadows.

Armenia has no oil and few other resources, leaving it somewhat out in
the cold. A friend who went there for an Ireland game in 2010 reported
back that while the place itself was perfectly safe and fine, if a
little drab, it held a sense of feeling cut off from the world —
unsurprisingly, given its rugged geography.

There’s a lengthy tradition in Russian literature of writers
travelling to the Caucasus — a region which, even after two decades
of strife, still looks like a Timotei-ad Alpine paradise — for
inspiration. Lermontov, Pushkin, Mandelstam and Tolstoy all did it.

Vasily Grossman, the venerated chronicler of the horrors of the
Holocaust and Stalingrad, was thus in good company when he journeyed
to Armenia in the early 1960s.

Grossman went there because, after his book Life And Fate was
“arrested” by Khrushchev’s ministry of literary correctness, he
received a surprising offer to translate an old novel (about, wait
for it, the construction of a copper-smelting plant) from Armenian
into Russan. Relieved at the chance of some respite from the KGB,
he headed south for two months and wrote down everything he saw.

But while those men of letters generally went to the Caucasus to bask
in gorgeous surroundings and take the waters, Armenia was and is the
exception to the region’s jaw-dropping mixture of lush pastures and
tropical vistas. “There is no greenery,” writes Grossman. “The houses
are surrounded by dense scatterings of grey stone. Sometimes a grey
stone comes to life and begins to move. A sheep.”

Everywhere he walks, he sees granite instead of growth, sterility
instead of fertility. “Sometimes this seems to be a strange and
terrible kingdom where the earth engenders not life, but death.”

Reaching Yerevan, the bustling capital, he marvels at the huge Stalin
statue that towers over the city. The Armenians — who will soon tear
it down — react to this praise by dismissing Stalin as a maniac and,
worse, a puppet figurehead. Grossman feels a mad urge to stick up for
the dictator — a bizarre position for a Soviet intellectual to find
themselves in.

Grossman finds Armenia’s inhabitants a puzzle. He recoils from the
stereotype of Armenians as “primitive[s], pederasts and swindlers”,
but keeps running into individuals whose trumpeting of Armenian
superiority in the arts, culture and architecture drives him slowly
insane. He knows it stems from an inner defensiveness caused by the
bloodstained history of the place, but finds it no more palatable for
that: “What matters is the global, even cosmic, superiority of the
Armenian people. Sometimes this passion is touching and wonderful;
sometimes it is sweet and funny; sometimes it is so insane as to
be shocking.”

Grossman died of cancer in 1964 and never saw An Armenian Sketchbook
published. It’s obvious he loved the place, for all its oddness —
the book pulses with life and affection on every page, even though
he apologises on the final page for “clumsy and wrong” things he’d
written. He needn’t have worried. This is a moving, beautiful little
encomium to what is still, even today, one of the obscurest corners
of Europe.

The Armenian Higher Education Initiative Brings New Regions, New Dis

THE ARMENIAN HIGHER EDUCATION INITIATIVE BRINGS NEW REGIONS, NEW DISCIPLINES TO SECOND ANNUAL SUMMER PROGRAM

19:15, August 7, 2013

The AHEI is pleased to announce the completion of its second annual
Summer Program in Humanities and Social Sciences. This year, students
came together from Javakh, Abkhazia, as well as several regions of
Armenia for an intensive course designed to enhance critical thinking
skills and lay solid groundwork for future research undertakings. The
program was sponsored by the Open Society Institute, and training
space was provided by Yerevan State University.

A variety of experts from across the Armenian diaspora combined efforts
to deliver an integrated series of seminars and lectures in their
respective areas of specialization. Two primary seminars in political
science theory and historiography – given by DrsHamazaspDanielyan of
Yerevan State University and Elke Hartmann of the Freie University
of Berlin – were complemented by lectures in comparative government;
the history of diplomacy; art, politics, and propaganda; and other
subjects. In addition, participants received an intensive two-week
introduction to SPSS, a software program commonly used in social
science research.

Following the course, students will spend the next several months
conducting research on themes determined during the course of the
program. Research projects will be monitored distantly by participating
professors.

AHEI alumni continue to build bonds with one another and share
academic and professional opportunities through active online
networks. Because of the links created between staff, alumni, and
related parties, participants have expanded their academic horizons,
gained employment, and found new volunteer opportunities. In addition,
AHEI networks serve as a bridge between critical members of diasporan
communities that would otherwise have very little or no contact with
one another. The organization continues to work on expanding these
networks and opening more doors to its members.

For more information about the Armenian Higher Education Initiative,
please go to or contact Sarah Ludwig, Executive Director
at [email protected].

http://hetq.am/eng/news/28595/the-armenian-higher-education-initiative-brings-new-regions-new-disciplines-to-second-annual-summer-program.html
www.armhei.org

About 200 Young Armenians To Get Education At Russian Universities

ABOUT 200 YOUNG ARMENIANS TO GET EDUCATION AT RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES

ITAR-TASS, Russia
August 2, 2013 Friday 10:48 PM GMT+4

YEREVAN August 2

– About 200 young men and girls from Armenia will get higher
education at the leading universities and senior colleges in Moscow,
St Petersburg and other Russian cities.

An opportunity for this has opened up thanks to an intergovernmental
agreement on cooperation in the sphere of education.

A gala ceremony of honoring the applicants who have been admitted to
universities was held here Friday.

“You’ll get education in the specialties enjoying a high social
demand,” the Russian ambassador to Armenia, Ivan Volynkin said at
the ceremony as the greeted the new students. “You’ll be educated in
line with the Russian standards, which means you’ll get an up-to-date
quality education.”

“Russian has become the language of your professional training now,”
he went on. “It opens a door into the world of science and innovations,
as well as into high spiritual culture that close and well-familiar
to the broadest sections of Armenia’s population.”

The Russian language will become an important factor for job placement
and professional growth of the young people when they graduate from
universities.

“Your knowledge and skills will be needed, first and foremost at the
1,500 enterprises and companies with Russian ownership that boast a
big production potential and need qualified personnel,” Volynkin said.

“Along with your studies, this demand for personnel will continue
growing, as many new developments will occur over that time in the
multifaceted Russian-Armenian allied cooperation.”

He voiced the confidence that each of the 200 new students “will
complete education in Russia and will work successfully for the benefit
of your homeland, assisting a growth of friendship and cooperation
between Russia and Armenia.”

Volynkin wished “fruitful studies, successes, achievements, and
creative discoveries young people.

Viktor Rebets, the Director General of the South Caucasian Railway
said this affiliation of the Russian state railway corporation RZD
will look forward to employing the graduates of Russian universities
and colleges.

First Nations Need To Quit Blaming The Past

FIRST NATIONS NEED TO QUIT BLAMING THE PAST

The Vancouver Province (British Columbia)
July 31, 2013 Wednesday
Final Edition

by Naomi Lakritz, The Province
Editorial

It was edifying to learn that colonialism was responsible for the
death of five-year-old Phoenix Sinclair of Fisher River, Man. I always
thought that her mother, Samantha Kematch, and Kematch’s common-law
husband, Karl McKay, were responsible. After all, they’re the ones
serving life sentences for her murder. They’re the ones who chose to
torture her to death.

According to Jay Funke, a lawyer for the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs
and the Southern Chiefs Organization, it was colonialism. Last week,
he told an inquiry into the little girl’s death that “First Nation
leaders believe that the tragedy suffered by Phoenix was, in large
part, the result of centuries of colonial-based policies and practices
which have been forced upon the First Nations people of Canada.”

That’s odd. All the colonials I know had the same reaction when
they heard of the terrible abuse Kematch and McKay inflicted on this
poor child, including beatings, shooting her with a BB gun, choking
her until she was unconscious, forcing her to eat her own vomit and
leaving her to die on a cold basement floor, eight years ago. That
reaction was: “I wish I could have adopted her and loved her and
saved her life.”

Oh, these heartless colonials, eh? But First Nations leaders believe
colonialism was responsible. Deflect, deflect, deflect. Excuses,
excuses, excuses. Poor Kematch and McKay, they’re not to blame. They
were just puppets of forces bigger than themselves. Apparently not
endowed with the ability to make decisions, know right from wrong or
take adult responsibility for their adult lives, they were victims
of colonialism.

Can’t you just see it now? “Karl, our ancestors were misled and lied
to by David Laird after he was made Indian commissioner responsible
for Manitoba in 1898. So, shoot Phoenix some more with the BB gun. She
isn’t crying hard enough.”

Odd, too, how colonialism could have such a huge effect on McKay, but
leave his teenage son unaffected and perfectly able to distinguish
right from wrong. The boy testified at his father’s trial that
he noticed how “skinny” Phoenix had become in the spring of 2005,
but that Kematch threatened him if he tried to give Phoenix food. He
told the court he never saw the little girl eat and then, weeping, he
testified that “I waited until those guys left and gave her food. They
didn’t help her.”

They didn’t help her – not because of the historic wrongs done to
aboriginal people, but because “those guys” were scum. They alone are
responsible for her torture and murder, not history. This is about
individuals and their character, not their ethnicity.

Funke also told the inquiry that a lot of aboriginal people see the
seizing of native children as being like the residential school
system. Who cares how they see it? If they are not going to take
proper care of their children, then they have nobody to blame but
themselves when their kids are seized. If Phoenix had been placed
with foster parents, white or aboriginal, and not returned to the
piece of garbage who is her mother, she would be alive today.

There are no circumstances which prevent anyone from deciding that they
are going to be the best parents they can be. Nothing prevents them
from seeking help to achieve that goal, if needs be. No situation,
whether it took place in history or is being lived right now in
the present moment, is so bad that it makes individuals decide to
shoot, choke, beat and otherwise torture a fiveyear-old child. At
the trial, McKay’s lawyer said that his client was just performing
“fun choke holds” he’d seen on TV wrestling shows and was surprised
that he had hurt Phoenix. Performing “fun choke holds” from wrestling
shows? Colonialism no more makes you perform fun choke holds on your
child until she blacks out than it makes you a fan of TV wrestling.

Funke told the inquiry that “the First Nations leaders of (Manitoba)
are committed to ensuring that Phoenix did not die in vain.” Sadly,
Phoenix did die in vain and nothing can change that. But those leaders
can see to it that more children do not die in vain by dropping
the victimization mantle because it is not doing aboriginal people
any favours.

There is not an ethnic group in the world that has not suffered
terrible injustices at one time or another in its history. No one has
escaped this. To name just a few, the Armenians suffered genocide
in 1915, the Tutsis of Rwanda in 1994, the Jews and Roma suffered
unspeakable horrors during the Holocaust, the Ukrainians were victims
of Josef Stalin’s forced famine, with more than seven million starved
to death in Stalin’s diabolical plot to destroy them for the “crime”
of wanting independence from his reign.

None of these ethnic groups blames their own histories when a member of
the group abuses, neglects, or tortures to death their own children,
as Kematch and McKay tortured Phoenix to death. If First Nations
leaders want to start somewhere, a good place would be with the
concept of individual responsibility.

Naomi Lakritz is a columnist with the Calgary Herald.

Owner Of Riverboat In Egg Harbor Township Pushes Vessel Back Into Wa

OWNER OF RIVERBOAT IN EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP PUSHES VESSEL BACK INTO WATER

The Press of Atlantic City (Pleasantville New Jersey)
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Business News
July 29, 2013 Monday

by Joel Landau, The Press of Atlantic City, Pleasantville, N.J.

July 29–Egg Harbor Township’s riverboat is back where it belongs. The
Belle Miracle Ann returned to the water in the township near the
Longport-Somers Point Boulevard on Wednesday, said its owner,
Leonard Dagit.

The historic riverboat, one of the South Jersey’s more unique roadside
attractions, sustained damage and washed ashore after Hurricane Sandy
in October. Dagit did not have a monetary figure for the damage,
noting some of his other properties — including his home — were
also damaged and that it was a cumulative cleanup.

Dagit had to wait for the boat, which dates to the 1920s, to be
restored before it could be moved several hundred feet back onto the
water at the Anchorage Poynte community.

“So far so good,” he said Thursday night, adding it was a relief to
return the large vessel to the water. “A lot of people in the area
will be affected by Sandy a lot longer than this.”

A large crane and excavator were used to push the boat onto the water.

Dagit said they waited for a full moon and high tide so the water
level would be at its highest.

“If it wasn’t (moved Wednesday), it would have been (moved) next
month,” he said.

The multilevel boat was first brought to the back bays of Egg Harbor
Township in 2005 by Hosrof “Sonny” Bagraduni, the Armenian-American
owner of a West Atlantic City hotel. Bagraduni died in 2008 before
he could renovate the vessel — then known as the Tarlan Rose —
as a floating event hall.

Two years later, Dagit purchased the boat, renamed it the Belle Miracle
Ann and towed it to its location near the entrance to Anchorage Poynte.

The boat’s purpose is mainly for private parties that Dagit said
occur only a couple of times a year.

Israel And Azerbaijan: Geopolitical Reasons For Stronger Ties

ISRAEL AND AZERBAIJAN: GEOPOLITICAL REASONS FOR STRONGER TIES

Jerusalem Post
July 26, 2013 Friday

BYLINE: ANNA GEIFMAN AND DIMA COURSE

SECTION: FEATURES; Pg. 12

The South Caucasus region is of strategic value for Israel, due
to its geopolitical position and proximity to Iran. Azerbaijan, a
key player in the region, is a Shi’ite country that maintains close
working relations with the Jewish state. Strained relations between
Azerbaijan and Iran are an equally critical factor. Aside from the
fact that Israel is dealing with a classic situation of “the enemy
of my enemy is my friend,” it benefits from selling the Azeris’
technical services, technologies and security systems. Moreover,
Israel has always been on the lookout for a moderate Muslim partner,
a role previously filled by Turkey – and Azerbaijan can fit that role.

It is hardly accidental that President Shimon Peres, accompanied by
three ministers and representatives of 60 Israeli industrial companies,
visited Baku in 2009. Then-foreign minister Avigdor Liberman made
a trip to Azerbaijan in April 2012. His counterpart, Azeri Foreign
Minister Elmar Mammadyarov, paid a return visit to Israel in April
2013. Currently, the bilateral relationship is good, and there are
prospects for even stronger ties between the two countries.

TURMOIL IN the Middle East affects the Caspian Sea region and
simultaneously provides opportunities for Israel, whose mutual interest
with Azerbaijan is to confront an increasingly radical Islam.

Though nominally Muslim, Azerbaijan’s secular regime perceives
both Sunni and Shi’ite fundamentalists as an alarming threat. The
Sunni radicals connected to al-Qaida are willing to cooperate with
neighboring Dagestan’s terrorist underground, which is periodically
activated in the northern parts of Azerbaijan. An even greater reason
for concern is the Shi’ite radicals; they are a tool for Iran’s
Revolutionary Guards and seek radical changes in Azerbaijan, to turn
it into a pro-Iranian regime. Any contact with Israel therefore causes
anxiety in the Islamic Republic; for example, the 2009 Peres visit to
Baku led to complications between Baku and Tehran and the recalling
of the Iranian ambassador “for consultations.”

There is also strong evidence that Iran is intent on undermining
domestic stability in Azerbaijan. In October 2011, the leader of the
pro-Iranian Islamic Party of Azerbaijan Movsum Samadov and several
of his comrades were sentenced to 10-12 years in jail for attempting
to overthrow the government by terrorist means. In February 2012,
dozens of militants were arrested in a rural area near Baku. Iran also
persistently threatens its northern neighbor; shortly after Samadov’s
arrest, Iranian Chief-of-Staff Maj.-Gen. Hassan Firouzabadi promised
Azeri President Ilham Aliyev “a grim future.”

It is therefore not surprising that, according to foreign sources,
Azerbaijan is a strategic bridgehead of Western and Israeli
anti-Iranian military and intelligence efforts. Tehran is nervous
about persistent, if officially denied, rumors about Israeli military
presence in Azerbaijan as a forward base against Iran. Regardless
of the validity of these rumors, Israeli authorities appreciate the
importance of cooperation with Azerbaijan, which seeks to hold its own
under the Iranian threat. In early 2012, this collaboration yielded
valuable results: the prevention of terrorist attacks against Israeli
diplomats in Baku.

ASIDE FROM Iran, Russia is a reason that Baku and Jerusalem should
strengthen their strategic partnership. Israel is upset about Russia’s
subversive presence in the Middle East, namely its interactions with
Iran, acceptance of Hamas and persistent backing of the Syrian rebels.

Azerbaijan is also unhappy with Moscow’s support for Armenia’s
position in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Yet, Israel may be swayed
into better relations with Russia due to potential benefits from
collaborative ventures in the technological sphere, as well as joint
fear of radical Islam; contrary to what may look like a partnership,
Russia’s relations with Iran are quite strained.

In 2011, the “Center-2011” maneuvers took place in the Caspian Sea,
the largest such exercise since 2002. Some 1,000 Russian servicemen
and dozens of vessels and boats participated. Despite attempts on the
part of some commentators to explain the maneuvers as necessitated
by NATO’s presence in Afghanistan and Turkey, it appears that the
“alleged enemy” was none other than Iran, or possibly its terror
proxy, Hezbollah. A similar exercise in the Caspian Sea took place
this April. Iran could react aggressively towards Azerbaijan in the
event of a Western attack on its nuclear program. For its part, Baku is
aware that Moscow is supportive of its secular regime and is friendly
towards the Azeri position with regard to the Caspian Sea division.

There is also the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is a connecting
point between Azerbaijan and Israel. For Azerbaijan, Armenia is a
bitter enemy with whom there are no serious chances for reconciliation
in the foreseeable future, especially after the Armenian defeat of
the Azeri military in 1994. As far as Israel is concerned, Armenia
is one of Iran’s closest partners; it is also probably a “loophole”
for Iran’s acquisition of prohibited weapons and technologies from
several former Soviet republics.

AMONG THE hurdles for Israeli-Azeri relations may be the “Turkish
issue.” In the past, all appeared simple, as Turkey was Azerbaijan’s
closest ally and Israel’s strategic partner. In the last few years,
however, the situation has become significantly complicated by
Turkish Islamization. Israel is currently interested in Azerbaijan’s
independence from any Turkish influence.

Israel and Azerbaijan stand to benefit greatly from even stronger
ties. From the Israeli point of view, there is serious potential for
expanding economic ties – if only because Baku sells oil to Israel
and is already a client of the Israeli hi-tech and military industries.

Israel’s drone planes are as much in demand in Azerbaijan as they are
elsewhere. Israel also sells its Azeri partner armored troop carriers,
multiple rocket launchers, Tavor rifles and ammunition.

However, since neither country has enough friends beyond its borders,
it should be clear that each partner may contribute to much-required
foreign lobbying for the sake of the other. Azerbaijan could be a
positive influence in Turkey, while Israel might prove equally helpful
in lobbying for the Azeris in the EU and the US. Though further
cooperation between Jerusalem and Baku will depend on geopolitical
developments, Israel would do well to capitalize on the opportunity.

Dr. Anna Geifman is a senior research fellow in the Department of
Political Studies at Bar-Ilan University and Professor Emerita at
Boston University.

Dima Course is a PhD candidate in political studies at Bar-Ilan
University.

This article was originally published on the Begin-Sadat Center for
Strategic Studies website.

Mougouch Fielding: Bohemian Muse And Widow Of The Painter Arshile Go

MOUGOUCH FIELDING: BOHEMIAN MUSE AND WIDOW OF THE PAINTER ARSHILE GORKY, WHOSE WORK SHE CHAMPIONED AFTER HIS SUICIDE

The Times (London)
July 26, 2013 Friday
Edition 1; National Edition

As Arshile Gorky’s wife and muse, and for six decades his widow,
Mougouch Magruder Gorky Phillips Fielding nurtured the work and
burnished the reputation of the father of Abstract Expressionism and
the man Robert Hughes described as “a kind of Bridge of Sighs between
Surrealism and America”.

A bright, bold, patrician beauty, she had a genius for friendship,
drawing devotees from New York’s postwar Surrealists to the last
members of the Bloomsbury Group. The travel writers Patrick Leigh
Fermor, Robin Fedden and Bruce Chatwin were among her admirers. When
her daughter Antonia married Martin Amis, his friend Christopher
Hitchens summed up her provenance as “pure bohemian aristocracy”.

Agnes Magruder was the daughter of the East Coast establishment –
Washingtonian John Holmes Magruder II, a US naval attache (later
Commodore), and his Bostonian wife, Ester Hosmer. She attended
schools in Washington, The Hague and Switzerland. Aged 19, she went
to Manhattan, where she enrolled at the Art Students League before
quitting for a typing Job at a communist magazine.

In February 1941 she was introduced to Gorky by her friends Elaine and
Willem de Kooning. Tall and good-looking with an extravagant moustache,
Gorky presented himself as a Georgian prince, a nephew of Maxim Gorky,
an alumnus of Brown and a student of Kandinsky. Although she would
not know it until a decade after his death, he was, in fact, Vosdanig
Manoug Adoian, an Armenian refugee who had survived the Turkish
genocide and landed on Ellis Island in 1920. When Agnes met him, he
was eking out a living by teaching at the Grand Central School and
selling the odd painting. His work was heavily derivative, brilliantly
imitating Cezanne almost stroke for stroke, and so closely following
Picasso that he would exclaim, “If he drips, I drip”. He called Agnes
“Mougouch” – little mighty one – a name which stuck. She would say,
“When I think of Gorky, I think about my life beginning.”

They married, to her parents’ horror, in September 1941 in Nevada
before a JP, with a curtain ring from Woolworths. Mougouch moved into
his Union Square studio where they lived on 64 cents a day. With his
captivating wife by his side, Gorky’s circle expanded.

Mougouch charmed dealers and cooked deliciously for curators. The most
dramatic effect on his work was three summers spent at the Magruder
estate in Virginia. At Crooked Run Farm, with his wife and their
daughters, Maro and later Natasha, his happiness spilt into his work.

Somehow reconnecting with the country of his childhood, his pictures,
like Water of the Flowery Mill and One Year the Milkweed, came alive
in mesmeric forms, not unlike Miro but entirely his own. “Dreams
form the bristles of the artist’s brush” was how he put it. A New
York Times critic described his abstract landscapes from this time as
“bathed in autumnal Keatsian mist, their forms as pulpy and sweet as
peeled ripe fruit”.

But in 1946 their life began to unravel. A fire in Gorky’s studio
destroyed 27 paintings, some portraits of Mougouch among them, and a
lifetime of drawings and art books. Two months later he was diagnosed
with rectal cancer and had a colostomy. A burst of painting followed,
including the elegiac Charred Beloved, but he was, in turn, angry
and depressed. A desperate, bewildered Mougouch had a brief affair
with Gorky’s friend, Edward Matta Echaurren – a serial seducer. As
she recalled, “[I] ruined my life with one zip”. Soon after, Gorky
broke his neck in a car accident and his painting arm was temporarily
paralysed. Mougouch returned to a demented Gorky. When he began hanging
ropes in the garden she told their daughters he was making swings
for them. After he pushed her down the stairs, his doctor advised
she take the children away and they fled to Virginia. Days later,
on July 21, 1948, Gorky hanged himself, leaving in chalk on the box
he had stood on and kicked away, “Goodbye my loveds”.

After a decade married to another painter, the Bostonian John (Jack)
C. Phillips, with whom she had two daughters, Mougouch moved to
London. In 1961 she Joined the circle (and thus the diaries) of Frances
Partridge, the last of the Bloomsburys, and David (“Bunny”) Garnett. In
1979 she married the writer and Crete war hero Xan Fielding.

All through her life she kept the flame of Gorky alive, lending his
pictures for retrospectives and showing remarkable generosity and
honesty with biographers. Among the results were superb books by her
son-in-law, Matthew Spender, and her stepdaughter, Hayden Herrera. In
2011 she appeared with Maro and Natasha in an extraordinary film
directed by her granddaughter, Cosima Spender. Together they visited
Union Square and the places of Gorky’s birth and death. As she rolled
her own cigarettes, 90-year-old Mougouch, still strikingly handsome,
recalled in her low rich voice her life with Gorky. “He was so proud,
and high and fine-looking. And he had a mighty paintbrush. I was
smitten immediately.”

She is survived by four daughters.

Mougouch Fielding, widow of Arshile Gorky, was born on June 1, 1921.

She died on June 2, 2013, aged 92

Activists Glad About Victory, Ready For Further Struggle

ACTIVISTS GLAD ABOUT VICTORY, READY FOR FURTHER STRUGGLE

17:13 07.08.13

Styopa Safaryan, a member of the Barev Yerevan (Hello Yerevan) group
at Yerevan’s City Council, and activist Ani Kaguinyan believe that
although civil society succeeded in getting fares reduced to the
previous rate, struggle for higher-quality transport services must
be continued.

“I do not view it as a victory because it [Yerevan Mayor Taron
Margaryan’s decision] reads ‘suspended’,” Kaguinyan said.

With respect to the sit-down protest in front of the Yerevan
Municipality and protesters’ demands for resignations, as well as for
dismissal of Head of the Transport Department, Yerevan Municipality,
Henrik Hambartsumyan, and Director of the Yerevantrans CJSC Misak
Hambartsumyan, Kaguinyan said that she joins her “friends’ struggle.”

In his turn, Styopa Safaryan said that public protests at the fare
rise had no precedents and is evidence of favorable tendencies.

As regards the claim the Barev Yerevan group’s lodged with the court,
which demands invalidation of the Yerevan mayor’s decision, Safaryan
is sure that the administrative court will allow the claim.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2013/08/07/styopa-safaryan/

Armenia’s Political Parties Need Better Government Financing – Armen

ARMENIA’S POLITICAL PARTIES NEED BETTER GOVERNMENT FINANCING – ARMEN MARTIROSYAN

19:21 07.08.13

The government must allocate an equivalent of ~@60,000-70,000 to the
political parties that received 3% of votes in the parliamentary
elections, and the total amount is expected to reach ~@2m in case
desired changes take place, Vice-Chairman of the Heritage party Armen
Martirosyan told Tert.am as he commented on the bill envisaging
increased government financing of political parties, approved by
Georgia’s Parliament in its first reading.

“Government financing of political parties is generally practiced,
especially in European countries. This solves a major institutional
problem. If the government finances a political party, it becomes
independent of any other sources of financing. In Armenia’s case they
are oligarchic structures. When the government finances political
parties to citizens’ benefit, they serve the state interests rather
than oligarchic interests,” Martirosyan said.

At present, the Heritage party receives $10,000 a year from Armenia’s
government, which is not even sufficient for renting an office
in Yerevan.

“Opposition parties cannot carry out large-scale activities in
Armenia’s regions on the funds they receive from the government. So
government financing is most important – of course, not for all the
officially registered parties,” Martirosyan said.

According to him, proper government financing of political parties
results has economic benefits.

“If political parties – especially opposition ones – were financed in
Armenia, they would be able to expand their activities and supervise
the shadow economy, which would ensure better supervision over
budgetary funds and bring benefit to citizens,” Martirosyan said.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2013/08/07/armen-martirosyan/

Ara Papyan: "The Relations With Turkish Are Getting Worse" (Video)

ARA PAPYAN: “THE RELATIONS WITH TURKISH ARE GETTING WORSE” (VIDEO)

[ Part 2.2: “Attached Text” ]

August 6 2013

The president of “Modus Vivendi” Center Ara Papyan, to the question
of Aravot.am whether it was not early for the condolence expressed by
Armenia’s Foreign Ministry on the occasion of Azerbaijani shepherd
killing by the Russian frontier at Turkish-Azerbaijani border,
answered,- “I do not think that we hurried, because the reaction,
in fact, was one or a day and a half later. It’s a different thing
that the Russian side gave a vague response to the first requests,
saying that the shepherd was armed and he was the first to shoot,
but the weapon was not presented. I’m still waiting for the Russian
side to present the weapon, and as long as there is no weapon,
the assertions are ungrounded. If the person is killed, naturally,
the gun must be in the territory of Armenia, he could not carry the
gun back. We did not hurry; simply we must have clearly demanded
the reaction of the Russian side, which was not done.” To the next
question whether this case will bring tension to Armenian-Turkish
relations, Papyan said: “Of course there will be tension because a
man has been killed, Turkish nationalism will use this, but I think
that this is also beneficial to other countries because it will wake
up fear in Armenians again, and I’m sure that many people will say
that relations with the Turks are getting worse. And what European
choice, because if we make a European choice, and Russians will not
defend us, the Turks we destroy us. This frame of mind instills in
the people. And who is interested in any incident or crime? This
gives rise to thinking.” To our observation that it was emphasized
that the deceased was Azerbaijani, whether it was done on purpose,
Papyan said: “Azerbaijani is a very abstract concept, I do not know
what an Azerbaijani is. Until recently Azerbaijani was the same
Turk, simply it was just the Shiite Turk, who was living in that
territory. Now, if he is a Shiite Turk, but, as I understood, was
once migrated from Azerbaijan, this is emphasized and here there is a
problem of inflaming anti-Armenian, i.e. inflaming Turks against us,
inflaming once again Azeri against us. There is a problem of putting
Armenians in a difficult situation.” 

Eva HAKOBYAN  

Read more at:

http://en.aravot.am/2013/08/06/155877/