Author: Kanayan Tamar

SPbPU Presents At Scientific Conference Hosted By Russian-Armenian University

Kanayan Tamar
Dec 30 2023

The 17th Annual Scientific Conference of the Russian-Armenian University (RAU) took place in the first week of December. A representative delegation of leading professors and staff of the Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade (IIME&T), the the Institute of Humanities (IH) and the Institute of Biomedical Systems and Biotechnologies (IBS&B) of Polytechnic University came to Armenia to attend the conference.

Rector of the Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University, full member (academician) of the Academy of Pedagogical and Psychological Sciences of Armenia Edward Sandoyan welcomed the participants of the conference: Nowadays many researchers can use their skills and knowledge to develop a new product, which can be monetized in the future. Today science is a true and real sector of the economy, with the help of which it is possible to create future strategies for the development of a country. I would like this conference to give us a new potential for the development of the future. I hope that in each section interesting questions will be voiced and answers will be found.

Olga Vlasova, Director of the Graduate School of Biomedical Systems and Technologies of IBS&B SPbPU, delivered a plenary report on «New Biophysical Methods of Neuron Research» at the opening of the conference. The multidisciplinarity of Polytechnic University developments made a special impression on the audience consisting of specialists from various fields.

SPbPU employees presented reports at the «Biological and Chemical Sciences» section. Nikita Zernov, a postgraduate student of SPbPU, research engineer at the Laboratory of Molecular Neurodegeneration, demonstrated the results of a joint research project with Lernik Unanyan, Head of the Structural Bioinformatics Laboratory of RAU, and postgraduate students Ani Makichyan and Victor Kamaryan.

Associate Professor Anastasiya Bolshakova presented research opportunities for students in graduate and postgraduate programs.

During the conference, IBS&B staff participated in a master class and workshop at the RAU Structural Bioinformatics Laboratory.

The workshop participants discussed the specificity of a potential therapeutic compound for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease being investigated both in silico and in vitro, and clarified the conditions for molecular docking.

The visit of the SPbPU IBS&B delegation to RAU has taken a new turn in the development of cooperation between our universities.

The delegation of the Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade presented 12 reports in face-to-face and online format on key problems of management, economics and finance, sustainable development, economic theory.

Associate Professor of the Graduate School of Production Management Natalia Alekseyeva made a report on «Managing the value of intellectual capital of the innovation-industrial cluster» at the «Management» section. Alex Krasnov, Associate Professor of the Graduate School of Service and Trade, made a report on «Strategies of interaction with influencers for consumer segmentation within the concept of influencer marketing».

Associate Professor of the Graduate School of Production Management Nikita Lukashevich held a master class on «Economics of project activity: how to understand that the project is profitable?» for students of the Department of Management and Business of the RAU Institute of Economics and Business. Associate Professor Natalia Alekseyeva held a master class on «Time Management: Skills of a Successful Manager».

Students of the Department of Economics and Finance attended the «Digital Resources in Scientific Research» master class by Victoria Brazovskaya, assistant professor of the Higher School of Engineering and Economics, Chair of the IIME&T Student Scientific Community.

There was also a meeting with the chairman of the RAU Student Scientific Society, where the main directions for cooperation in student science were defined. At the Department of Economics and Finance, ten students were awarded certificates of advanced training on the program «Data analysis in digital environment based on Python programming language».

Undoubtedly, the exchange of pedagogical and managerial experience that took place at the conference will be the beginning of fruitful international cooperation in the field of linguistics, Russian studies, jurisprudence, media communication, pedagogy, psychology and others. The work of the sections took place in different formats. Scientific reports were presented, interactive lectures, round tables and master classes were organized, devoted to topical problems in different fields of science.

The open lecture by Natalia Chicherina, Director of the Institute of Humanities, on the existing models of multilingual university and language practices implemented in them aroused keen interest not only of the student but also of the pedagogical community. The participants of the interactive lecture discussed whether SPbPU and RAU are multilingual universities and what language practices are accomplished in these universities.

Cooperation in the field of teaching Russian as a foreign language is of special significance for Russian-Armenian relations. Anna Rubtsova, Director of the Graduate School of Linguistics and Pedagogy, took an active part in the work of the «Rusistics» section, where innovative approaches in the methodology of teaching Russian as a foreign language, various linguocultural and philological issues were discussed. Anna Rubtsova also held talks on the creation of a network educational program for teaching Russian as a foreign language.

Marina Arkannikova, Director of the Graduate School of Media Communications and Public Relations, made a report «World Trends and Drivers of Development of the Communications Industry», introduced the conference participants to the educational project of the Graduate School of Media and Public Relations «Engineers of Meanings» and proposed to organize with the Institute of Media, Advertising and Cinema of the RAU a joint round table within the framework of the 17th anniversary International Scientific and Practical Conference «PR and Advertising Technologies in the Information Society» in SPbPU in April 2024.

At the «Political Science» section, Alexander Kholod, Director of the Center for Social Communications Research at GSOMISO, spoke about the projects that create an image of the future for Polytechnic University of 2030, and invited RAU professors and students to take part in the project «Engineers of Meanings» aimed at training specialists in the communications sphere.

Associate professors of the Higher School of Law and Forensic Expertise Alexander Isaev and Alexander Tebryaev made reports and held master classes on the problems of forensic expert examination in law enforcement, on conducting engineering and technical transport expertise, as well as discussed with colleagues from RAU the prospects of cooperation in criminalistics.

Maria Kukushkina, assistant professor of the Higher School of Linguistics and Pedagogy of the Institute of Humanities, conducted a master class devoted to the work with fear of public speaking. RAU students, participants of the master class, derived the «formula of successful performance» and brilliantly applied the obtained knowledge in practice in working with cases.

During the visit to the RAU Institute of Media, Advertising and Cinema, the polytechnic agreed with its director Karen Markarian on academic mobility, joint research projects and organization of a round table at the XVII International Scientific and Practical Conference «PR and Advertising Technologies in Information Society» of SPbPU.


https://indiaeducationdiary.in/spbpu-presents-at-scientific-conference-hosted-by-russian-armenian-university/

Prime Minister Pashinyan receives Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Overchuk

Kanayan Tamar

 12:10,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 15, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Friday received Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Overchuk.
 
The parties discussed current matters of Armenian-Russian relations within the framework of the work of the intergovernmental commission on economic cooperation between Armenia and Russia, as well as collaboration in the EAEU format, the Prime Minister’s Office said in a readout.
 
The interlocutors also reflected on the possibilities of reopening transportation and economic communications in the South Caucasus.
 
Nikol Pashinyan noted that the Armenian government has presented the Crossroads of Peace project, adding that Yerevan is ready for the unblocking of the regional transport infrastructures based on the principles of sovereignty, jurisdiction,equality and reciprocity.

Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan also attended the meeting.

Senior diplomat believes difficulties in Russian-Armenian relations surmountable

Kanayan Tamar
TASS, Russia
Dec 15 2023
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Galuzin pointed to the numerous historical, cultural, humanitarian and economic ties between the peoples of Armenia and Russia

MOSCOW, December 15. /TASS/. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Galuzin expressed confidence that the current difficulties Russia and Armenia are experiencing in their relations can be overcome and there is still a chance to improve ties between the countries.

Galuzin pointed to the numerous historical, cultural, humanitarian and economic ties between the peoples of Armenia and Russia. "This instills confidence in me, not only in me but in all of us, that any temporary difficulties in our relations are not just surmountable, they are surmountable with a chance for the further development of our diverse ties," he told reporters.

"Our peoples are in favor of their strengthening, development, broadening and deepening. This is the main forte of our relations, everything else is surmountable," the diplomat added.

Asbarez: ANCA Pasadena Endorses Brandon Lamar for City Council District 3

Kanayan Tamar
by Contributor

 

 

 

in Latest, News, Top Stories

Brandon Lamar


Endorses Pasadena City Council District 3 Candidate Brandon Lamar        

PASADENA—The Armenian National Committee of America Pasadena Chapter announced its endorsement of District 3 candidate, Brandon Lamar, in his bid for Pasadena’s City Council during the 2024 March Primary Election.

After an elaborate review process, the ANCA Pasadena Chapter Board decided to endorse Brandon Lamar’s candidacy based on his sound vision and strategic plan for Pasadena’s District 3, and his strong support of the local Armenian American Community.

“Brandon has an understanding of the issues that concern the Armenian American community in his district and the City of Pasadena overall, as well as the awareness and insight on how to improve on those issues,” said ANCA Pasadena Chapter board member, Sona Donayan.

As a proud resident of Pasadena, Brandon Lamar has served in multiple public offices and commissions in the City of Pasadena, including as chair of the Human Relations Commission and as a member of the Pasadena Housing Rental Board. Brandon has also been a community volunteer with several organizations such as Young Kings Retreat, which he founded, and volunteer advisor for Harambee Ministries.

In addition to his experience in organizing and building coalitions within communities, Lamar’s reach has been extensive through affiliations with clubs and organizations like Pasadena Young Democrats which he founded and was its president. He was also the VP of Campaigns of the Pasadena Foothills Democrats and a board member of the Pasadena NAACP. His love of people and community makes him a natural leader, something which has propelled him into public life and service.

“I want to express my sincere gratitude to the Armenian National Committee of America Pasadena Chapter for endorsing my Pasadena City Council race. The Armenian community’s significant contributions to the sustainability of Pasadena are truly appreciated. I am eager to collaborate with you to foster a more equitable future for our city. Thank you for your support,” said Brandon Lamar.

Born and raised in Pasadena, Lamar has lived in Pasadena, Altadena, and Sierra Madre for all of his young life. His nine-year experience of working on boards and commissions, overseeing initiatives and objectives, set in motion opportunities in engaging with different community leaders, community organizers and stake holders in order to find solutions to public safety, affordable housing, immigrant rights, minimum wage matters and many more. His combined priorities of affordable housing, public safety, and homelessness are at the crux of his campaign. All of these and more are what make his candidacy for Pasadena City Council compelling. His dedication and contribution to public life, at such a young age, is simply exceptional.

District 3 is poised for a bright future, and with Brandon Lamar as its representative, the outlook for the entire city shines even brighter.

The Armenian National Committee of America – Pasadena Chapter is the oldest, largest and most influential non-partisan Armenian American grassroots organization of its kind within the City of Pasadena. Founded in 1979, the Pasadena ANCA advocates for the social, economic, cultural, and political rights of the city’s thriving Armenian American community and promotes increased civic service and participation at the grassroots and public policy levels.

Empathy for the innocent

Kanayan Tamar
December 6, 2023 Stepan Piligian In Sight, Columns 0

One of our challenges as a global nation is to express public empathy and support for those experiencing the horror of man’s inhumanity. There should be a special bond between peoples who have suffered unspeakable atrocities, but it is not always a certainty. Armenians have for too long been mired in our own tragedies. Where were we when the Bosnia, Darfur or Rwanda genocides were happening and in their aftermaths? The unspoken excuse may be that there are limited cultural or political intersections to spur our interest. Apparently, our common existence as humans is not sufficient. There needs to be a relationship, common history or geopolitical connection for most nations, including Armenians, to stand up. This is unfortunate and reflects our need to mature as a global community. Tragically, the instability of our world affords us many opportunities to stand against oppression and atrocities. As victims of genocide, we should be the first to oppose violations of the human dignity of others. Shared interests are the key to political alliances, yet we remain silent.

Tragically, the instability of our world affords us many opportunities to stand against oppression and atrocities. As victims of genocide, we should be the first to oppose violations of the human dignity of others. Shared interests are the key to political alliances, yet we remain silent.

The Kurds have been victims of atrocities in Turkey, Syria and Iraq. We have much in common with the Kurds considering the oppressive policies committed by the Turks and our geographic proximity. Instead of recognizing the protection that Kurds provided to many Armenian villages in northern Syria during the ISIS incursion, we focus on the complicity of some Kurdish tribes during the Genocide. Rather than connect with the Kurds in southeastern Turkey for their local support to rebuild Soorp Giragos church in Diyarbakır, for example, we remain focused on the past. Is this an ethnic bias, anti-Muslim perspective or do we need to desperately upgrade our political thinking? 

The current Israel-Hamas war is another opportunity for us to end our silence. I would prefer to label this conflict as Israeli-Palestinian. With over 15,000 Palestinians dead (70-percent of the victims are women and children), I think it qualifies as a broader conflict than simply targeting Hamas. The western media likes the term Hamas, since it fits the public narrative that this is a war between a nation defending itself against terrorists. It downplays the incredible “collateral damage” to civilians, justified by a search for hidden militants within the general population. No one can justify the killing of Israeli civilians by Hamas. It is an extreme group with foreign funding that is bent on destruction. Yet discussions as to why an extreme group governs the densely populated Gaza Strip typically whitewash all Palestinians as hate-driven racists. The Palestinians are a very cultured people with legitimate rights, yet they are portrayed as either terrorists or merely existing. 

Extremes usually come to power as a response to dysfunction or a loss of hope. The Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank have been deceived and betrayed by many parties in the region and have emerged with a bitter view of life. The Israeli relationship with the Palestinians is a matter of control through subjugation. When Israel decided to “leave” Gaza, it sealed it off from the world, controlling the flow of energy, water and food. Gaza is a virtual prison, and its young people are filled with despair. Maintaining this environment is not in the interests of Israel or Palestine. It breeds mistrust, anger and an endless supply of youth who see fighting as the only answer. Netanyahu is a controversial figure with his own set of legal problems in Israel. The discontent of common Israeli citizens with his policies and drive for judicial reform is masked today, as the nation is consumed with the Palestinian war. His policies of land grabbing and illegal settlements are well documented, reflecting his long-term objective of reducing the Palestinian presence. 

With two extremes governing Gaza and Israel, the region remains a powder keg for violence. Moderate leaders are needed to build confidence. What is the end point of Netanyahu’s campaign of horrific violence? Is it the eradication of Hamas or the permanent displacement of the Gaza Palestinians? Even with the former, what is the governing plan? Netanyahu has already stated that the Palestinian Authority that governs the West Bank is unacceptable. Keeping the Palestinians divided serves a more nefarious purpose and is not in the long-term interests of Israelis.

Where are Armenians relative to the latest outbreak of violence in the Middle East? Our relationships with the two adversaries are quite complicated. Armenians, particularly here in the United States, have always had an affinity for the Jewish people. There are natural connections as victims of genocide and the common cultural attribute of entrepreneurship. Armenians and Jews in America are generally well-educated and are the product of strong traditional family values and Judeo-Christian tradition. The challenges lie in the political impact of Israel’s policies. Many Jews are appalled by the Israeli government’s aggression. Others are aligned with their homeland. For Armenians, a gap has emerged between respecting the Jewish people while disagreeing with the policies of the Jewish state. Israel has not only refused to recognize the Armenian Genocide but has actively worked over the years to prevent its recognition in the U.S. This policy is shameful given our shared history with genocide. In addition, Israel is a major arms and technology provider to the terrorist state of Azerbaijan, which has resulted directly in the loss of Armenian lives and territory. Azerbaijan and Israel’s swap of energy and spy capabilities for military aid is painful for Armenians. The current controversy in the Armenian quarter of Jerusalem only further complicates an already tense interplay.

“From Artsakh to Gaza, No More Genocide” (Armenian Action Network, Twitter)

The Armenian-Palestinian relationship is equally complicated, with diverse views within our community. Many Armenians maintain an unfortunate anti-Muslim bias based on historical conflicts. With this perspective, we tend to forget that it was the Arab nations that welcomed Armenians after the Genocide. In the West Bank, where Armenians maintain responsibility for many churches and holy sites, the Palestinian Authority has been very supportive over the years and provided the small Armenian presence a counterbalance to the difficult situation facing Christians. 

In the U.S., the current dilemma illustrates that it is dangerous and inappropriate to paint anti-Semitism and opposing Israeli policies with the same brush. Generalizations regarding race and ethnicity are a convenient tactic to put critics on the defensive. I believe Israel has a right to exist and defend itself, and we should all have empathy in response to instances of anti-Semitism. Likewise, Palestinians have a right to live in dignity with self-determination. Removing those inalienable rights by force will lead to resistance (remember our fedayees and our Artsakh heroes) and is not in the best interests of either party.

Hamas came to power as an extreme group several years ago in part due to the horrendous conditions in Gaza. Their rise to power led to extreme acts that cannot be condoned. Prior to the establishment of Israel, the Zionists were frustrated by the British position on establishing a Jewish state. Menachem Begin, who later became prime minister of Israel, was leader of the Irgun military group that implemented terrorist activities, the most significant being an attack on the British HQ at the King David hotel, where many civilians died. He became a wanted man but was a hero to his fellow Jewish nationalists. This history, however, does not justify the deaths of the innocent in the Hamas attacks. Nothing can rationalize such horrific violence. Likewise, the eradication of Hamas does not give the government of Israel the license to conduct a scorched earth policy in Gaza and continue land grabbing and oppression in the West Bank. With the massive number of casualties, the war has transitioned from self-defense to atrocity revenge. 

Gaza is one of the most densely populated areas on earth. 2.3 million people live on a small strip of land. Palestinians living in the north were told to move to the south, which was subsequently bombed beyond human comprehension. Now there is nothing to return to, except a replica of Dresden in WWII. What is the end point if Hamas is removed and the Palestinian Authority is unacceptable? The permanent displacement of these people, with the establishment of buffer zones or deportation paths to Egypt, is criminal. The United States, the major military and diplomatic ally of Israel, has made it clear that it is unacceptable to permanently displace the Palestinians, but Armenians in Artsakh heard those same empty words. For the oppressed, trust is a difficult response when you are fighting for survival.

Armenians must be more active in opposing atrocities and violations of basic human rights. If we expect the world to respect our rights, then we need to reciprocate when appropriate. Unchecked aggression will leave thousands of innocent Israelis and Palestinians dead, with a destroyed infrastructure in Gaza. The construction of more refugee camps and dependence on humanitarian aid to assist the millions displaced will only generate more anger, frustration and revenge. Where is the leadership with the leverage to stop the violence and end the oppression?

Supplying arms to Israel has made the United States appear complicit in the eyes of those on the receiving end of the carpet bombing. Netanyahu is obsessed with destruction. Is this his way of covering for his gross lapses in security? It pains me to discuss this with my Jewish friends, but generations have not known peace in Israel. The demonstrations organized by Jews seeking a ceasefire should be an eye opener for all of us. They have a right to be war weary, as are the Palestinians. This problem will not be solved by denying human rights to one group. While the political and humanitarian complexities are sorted out, we must stand against what is wrong. Armenians should internalize the many parallels with the plight of the Palestinians. Supporting Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic. It is possible to support the rights of Israel and the rights of Palestinians. It is also appropriate to be critical when human rights are violated. We can earn respect by showing respect.

  •  Bio
  •  Latest Posts
Columnist
Stepan was raised in the Armenian community of Indian Orchard, MA at the St. Gregory Parish. A former member of the AYF Central Executive and the Eastern Prelacy Executive Council, he also served many years as a delegate to the Eastern Diocesan Assembly. Currently , he serves as a member of the board and executive committee of the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR). He also serves on the board of the Armenian Heritage Foundation. Stepan is a retired executive in the computer storage industry and resides in the Boston area with his wife Susan. He has spent many years as a volunteer teacher of Armenian history and contemporary issues to the young generation and adults at schools, camps and churches. His interests include the Armenian diaspora, Armenia, sports and reading.


International support essential for protecting the victims of ethnic cleansing of Nagorno- Karabakh: Mirzoyan

Kanayan Tamar

 21:11, 4 December 2023

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 4, ARMENPRESS. On December 4, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia delivered remarks at the intersessional meeting of the Human Rights Council dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

The meeting was organized based on the tasking of the Human Rights Council’s resolution authored by Armenia, the foreign ministry said in a statement.

According to the source, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk and the Special Adviser of the UN Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide and Under Secretary-General Alice Wairimu Nderitu also delivered opening remarks during the event. High-ranking representatives of UN specialized bodies, rapporteurs and well-known experts in the field participated as panellists at the meeting.

In his speech, the Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan said:

“Excellences,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Armenia warmly welcomes the participants and panelists of the Intersessional Meeting on the Prevention of Genocide and extends its gratitude to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights for the organization of today’s session.

On 9 December we will mark the 75th anniversary of the adoption of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Today, 153 UN member states are bound by the universal obligation of punishing and preventing this crime of crimes.

Indeed, the Convention is a powerful crime suppression multilateral treaty. But not only. Today, the obligations emanating from the Convention have been well mainstreamed in the resolutions of the Human Rights Council on genocide prevention. 

Against this backdrop, I find it extremely important that the resolutions on Genocide Prevention enjoy wide cross-regional support and consensus in the Human Rights Council. It reflects a larger international consensus on the absolute imperative to prevent genocides through protection of individual and collective human rights of ethnic, religious, racial and national groups.

In this regard, the Human Rights Council is well-placed to be at the forefront of genocide prevention. We hope that the synergies and the cooperation between the Office of the Special Adviser of the Secretary General on the Prevention of Genocide, treaty bodies, and special procedure mandate holders will be further strengthened and institutionalized.

I take this opportunity to highlight the extensive work carried out by Special Adviser Alice Wairimu Nderitu.  

Excellences,

I have no doubt that the deliberations at this meeting will once again demonstrate the relevance of mass atrocity prevention in today’s world. The world we live in today is a dangerous place for many ethnic and religious groups, and the intent to destroy them on a certain territory has been manifested worldwide, particularly now when the international security arrangements and human rights mechanisms are in continuous decline.

The very idea of eliminating right holders as the medium of resolving conflicts has never been so “appealing” for perpetrators of crimes as it is today. The conflict situations provide ample environment for perpetrators, who under the guise of another party to the conflict, claim from the international community a treatment equal to one that should be extended to the victims.

Disparity of force has always been a constant feature of genocide. And by saying force, I did not exclusively refer to the military advantage of perpetrators but their ability to use new technologies in disinformation and misinformation in order to dehumanize victims, prepare grounds for deadly actions with their subsequent justification.  

One year ago, the 4th Global Forum Against the Crime of Genocide organized in Yerevan considered the role of new technologies in genocide prevention both from positive and negative angles. The Yerevan declaration adopted during the Forum acknowledged that the spread of disinformation and misinformation, particularly on social media platforms, can serve as a new propaganda tool to mislead and spread racism, intolerance, xenophobia, negative stereotyping and stigmatization, to violate and abuse human rights and dehumanize groups on the basis of identity.

Dear friends,

The perpetration of mass atrocities, including genocides, continues to take a considerable time in all its phases. As a matter of fact, the collective punishment of targeted groups takes different forms and manifestations, evolving incrementally in its gravity, including through violations of international human rights and international humanitarian laws, disruption of critical infrastructure, siege and massive violence. Needless to say that many mass atrocities could have been prevented once early warning signals were identified during those phases.

Collective failure should not be a justification for individual inaction for each and every UN member state.

Another important dimension of international responsibility is the international protection of victims, including those forcibly displaced.

Two months ago, the Republic of Armenia provided shelter and means of subsistence to more than 100 thousand refugees, the entire population of Nagorno-Karabakh uprooted from its ancestral homeland. Support of the international community is essential in providing international protection for these victims of ethnic cleansing.

Excellences,

Decades ago, when Armenia assumed responsibility in mainstreaming human rights into genocide prevention, we were driven by our moral duty towards the past. Today, we see that it is not merely about the past, rather our joint efforts are aimed at the present and future: a future of humanity free of hatred, racism, xenophobia and intolerance leading to mass atrocity crimes.

Despite all setbacks of the international human rights and security system, we will continue to actively engage in the Human Rights Council and other multilateral platforms for further elaboration of tools and mechanisms for the prevention of genocides and other mass atrocities.

I thank again the OHCHR and High Commissioner Volker Türk for the organization of the meeting and wish every success to panellists and participants.”




Armenia’s Artistic Gems: A Must-See Museum Trail

Kanayan Tamar
Dec 3 2023

Heritage


These museums are not just repositories of dusty artefacts; they are vibrant storytelling hubs that bring Armenia's rich heritage to life

Veidehi Gite

Armenia, a country in the heart of the Caucasus region, boasts a rich heritage that spans thousands of years. From its ancient historical sites to its vibrant contemporary art scene, Armenia is a treasure trove for travel enthusiasts. One of the most captivating aspects of this country is its many museums, each housing a unique collection of gems that offer a glimpse into the country's past and present. Embarking on a museum trail across Armenia promises an enriching and immersive experience, unveiling the diverse facets of its art and history.


In 1919, an ethnographer, archaeologist, and folklorist named Yervand Lalayan laid the foundation for what became the first museum of the Republic of Armenia in Yerevan. This three-story edifice, now a cornerstone of Armenian cultural heritage, houses an astonishing collection of 400,000 artefacts, including unique archaeological finds, numismatic treasures, and ethnographic specimens. While the museum's first two floors showcase a rotating array of temporary exhibits, it is the third floor that holds the permanent collection.

Begin your journey on the first floor, where a room next to the reception unveils the museum's journey through its formative years, from 1921 to 1931. As you ascend to the third floor, the museum's permanent collection unfolds before you, with a 1,800,000-year-old basalt chopper from Tavush, and the 1,200,000-year-old basalt hand axe from Kurtan, the oldest of its kind in Western Eurasia.

Stone Age exhibits amaze with the artefacts from the Paleolithic, Mesolithic, and Neolithic periods, offering a glimpse into the lives of prehistoric ancestors. exhibit, marvel at stones adorned with The Kingdom of Gods gallery is a veritable feast, offering a glimpse into Armenian wall painting fragments, a 9th-century phallus, and sculptural portraits of men. The statuette of goddess Arubani and God Teisheba, as well as other artefacts from the 4th to 6th centuries BC, are the standouts.

Getting There: For a swift commute from Yerevan Zvartnots Airport to Republic Square, consider a taxi. These reliable rides cost $6 and whisp you to Republic Square in 30 minutes.

Timings and entry fee: The museum is open to the public from 11am to 6pm, with the exception of Mondays when it is closed. The entry fee for adults is INR 312.

Address: 4 Republic Square, 375010, Armenia


Agulesti, a renowned Armenian painter, is affectionately called the "Van Gogh of Armenia." Her home, appropriately named "Armenia in one room," serves as a poignant tribute to Agulesti's profound love for her homeland. Founded in 1982, and housed in the artist's former home, this heritage house museum, nestled on Muratsan Street, is dedicated to the life and work of Lusik Agulesti.

The museum's labyrinthine corridors are a display of Agulesti's portraits and paintings. Intricate silver belts, adorned with intricate motifs and delicate gemstones, shimmer under the soft glow of museum lights. While traditional Armenian garments with elaborate embroidery, invite you to imagine the grace of those who once wore them. Utensils, dolls, weapons, carpets, and sculptures, all lovingly collected and preserved, offer a glimpse into Aguletsi's multifaceted talents and her deep appreciation for Armenian craftsmanship.

Getting There: The Lusik Agulesti House Museum is a mere 15-minute stroll from Yerevan's central train station and a 10-minute cab ride from the city centre.

Timings and entry fee: For a nominal entry fee of INR 415, the Lusik Agulesti House Museum welcomes visitors with open doors from 12 to 7pm.

Address: 79 Muratsan St, Yerevan, Armenia


Another captivating museum that ranks among the top three must-visit destinations in Armenia, is the Dzitoghtsyan House Museum of National Architecture and Urban Life in Gyumri, established in 1984. Built in 1872 by the affluent Dzitoghtsyan family, this stately residence, adorned with the distinctive red tuff stone, stands as a timeless testament to the city's architectural heritage.

Step inside and immerse yourself in the lives of Gyumri's elite, as the meticulously preserved interiors and traditional furnishings transport you back to the 19th and early 20th centuries. Furniture, wood carvings, metalwork, carpet weaving, textiles – these are just a few of the artistic expressions that adorn the museum's walls and shelves, each telling a story of the craftsmanship that flourished in Gyumri. Exhibits showcasing woodwork, carpets, hat crafting, embroidery, shoe making, tinwork, and silversmithing will open your eyes to the skills of Gyumri's artisans. But the Dzitoghtsyan House Museum isn't just about objects; it's about the people who breathed life into these spaces.

Getting There: The Dzitoghtsyan House Museum in Gyumri is a 2-hour drive from Yerevan by a cab.

Timings and entry fee: It is open from 9am to 5pm and closed on Mondays. The entry fee is INR 208 for adults.

Address: 47 Haghtanaki Avenue, Gyumri 3116, Armenia

https://www.outlooktraveller.com/experiences/heritage/armenias-artistic-gems-a-must-see-museum-trail

"Change strategy and fight" – political scientist’s proposal to Armenian authorities

Kanayan Tamar
Dec 1 2023
  • Armine Martirosyan
  • Yerevan

Armenia’s security

The old world order is collapsing, a new one is still in the process of formation, and these global changes cannot but affect the South Caucasus region. Armenian analysts argue that the 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh changed the security architecture of the region, making Armenia vulnerable and its policy overly cautious. Armenia’s expert community discusses that the authorities, instead of promoting the country’s interests, are “making concessions in exchange for a dubious peace.” And all regional actors are taking advantage of this in their own interests.

In this regard, the experts suggest that the Armenian government should “straighten its back and take more confident steps”. With the current course there is a danger of “turning into a quasi-state”, they warn.

Opinion of Lilit Grigoryan, political scientist and expert on CIS issues, on what steps are needed to ensure Armenia’s security.

  • “There are no Armenians left in NK, though Russians have taken to defending them”. Opinion about reasons
  • The impact of the Israeli conflict on the situation in the region. Will Azerbaijan start a war?
  • “Yerevan should reject this proposal”: opinion on direct talks with Baku

“Armenia is facing serious challenges, but the government does not seem to realize this. Incorrect analysis of the situation leads to constant mistakes.

There is a misconception in Armenia about the position of the international community. Here they think that it can guarantee established norms that Azerbaijan cannot ignore.

For example, the authorities think that by accepting the generally accepted Soviet borders, Armenia will be more protected. And it was possible to leave Artsakh to get security for Armenia itself in return. This is a big misconception.”

“The Armenian political identity has been weak since the 90s, since the time of the first president Levon Ter-Petrosyan, and now it is even weaker. We could say that it has never been formed.

Political identity means that you have ambitions in a good sense, goals. And you realize that you are creating a state and solving its problems. Armenia has a cultural identity: ancient history, literature, traditions and so on. But there is no political identity.

In the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh there was only forced self-defense. There were no preventive measures. But even this self-defense failed because of the lack of political identity, purpose and concept. In 1994, after the victory of the Armenian side, the Karabakh issue failed and the foundations for a new war were laid.

Now in Armenia the perception of itself has been critically debased. Armenian political thought believes that the country is weak, has no allies or its allies do not want to help it. So there is nothing left for it but to give in.

And the authorities have trapped themselves in this position and are wasting all their energy and resources on justifying their steps, instead of reconsidering their tactics and policy.

It is very important that the Armenian authorities realize their mistake and stop. And in this case we are talking about a group of people who make single decisions for the whole nation. The parliament does not take part in the processes at such a critical moment, despite the fact that Armenia is a parliamentary country. There are no discussions with the society, there are no serious studies.”

“The peace agenda of the Armenian authorities is simply capitulation. Because there is no compromise in it, it provides all conditions for one side, confirms the results of aggression, war, and forces the winner to put it on paper.

But when one side dictates and the other side is forced to give in, there will be no peace. And that is a problem. The problem is that this surrender is presented to the domestic audience as peace and the only way out.

A new order has been established in the region, and Armenia’s security situation is becoming even more complicated. In addition to Russia, new players and the forces supporting them – Turkey and to some extent Iran – are coming into play.

Regionalism and Eurasianism are no longer the game of a single actor. And in the near future we may see in Armenia the dynamics of the situation similar to the Middle East. This will further fragment the country and complicate the formation of new leadership.”

“Even in this situation, Armenia would have opportunities if there were the right political leadership. And not only in power, but also in alternatives to it.

Armenia should get rid of such false discussions as Armenian-centrism. As if we cannot go to the West or to the East, we must remain Armenian-centered, we are not pro-Russian, we are not pro-Western, but pro-Armenian. Relying on ourselves means self-isolation.

The Scandinavian countries, which adhere to neutrality, are members of the European system of values and European economic system by all parameters. They are not neutral either in economy or in arms production. And in a global sense they are members of the Western camp.

And when Armenia declares its neutrality, it means that if before it was in the Russian system, now it will be in the Eurasian system: Russia and Turkey and to some extent Iran.”

“If Armenia believes that this is the most convenient and less risky option, it should be ready to pay for it. In addition to Artsakh, Armenia will pay for this choice with so-called enclaves and certain demographic changes.

Now a period of soft war is beginning, when dangerous narratives are being spread through various influential people interested in trade with Azerbaijan and Turkey, but at the expense of Armenia’s interests.

And the reason for this situation is the constraint of Armenia’s political elite in its thoughts and decisions – on the Karabakh issue, on the issue of borders. It is the inability to form a political identity.

Instead of speaking from the position of the state, from the position of strength, Armenia displays cowardly behavior. Of course, it is necessary to be cautious, particularly when the country has lost part of the army’s capabilities. But when it becomes a character trait, the country pays the price.

It is not so much the defeat that is terrible, but the building of a new political identity on it, belonging to a narrow group of people. This already happened in Armenia’s history 100 years ago, when the ultra-left Bolsheviks promoted the idea of peace at any cost and only at the expense of Armenia’s interests.”

“Armenia should form a group of experts capable of defining the future, new role of the country in the region. It must decide whether it accepts the results of the 2020 war of aggression and the situation surrounding it.

It cannot accept the results that were achieved in violation of all international norms. The authorities should talk to new partners, who are interested in creating a new Armenia, a new statehood. Because to a certain extent the statehood has not been fully formed in Armenia. In this regard, both the authorities and the society should be ready for a proactive role and policy.

It is important to realize that there will always be a struggle. And it is necessary to understand which countries want Armenia to be a country capable of fighting.

Regional countries prefer Armenia to be a quasi-state, they have absolute consensus on this issue.

But there are Western countries, whose interests coincide with those of Armenia, and they do not benefit from the emerging order. We need to work with them, reform the army, restore the balance of power. Armenia should be armed and as strong as Azerbaijan, at least.

And the main thing is to create a concept both for the domestic audience and regional players. It is necessary to talk to Russia, Turkey and Iran and explain that Armenia will not accept their desire to keep itself in the position of a weakling.

We need cooperation with neighbors taking into account Armenia’s opinion. But the country cannot afford such a position if there is no combat-ready army and economic development. Armenia should have started diversifying its energy sector and economic investments long ago to be able to face challenges.

I do not believe the current government is capable of changing the situation because it is trapped in its “peace agenda”. Ideologically, it is in favor of a concept that is now taking shape, but it has its roots in the 90s and beyond. It is neo-Bolshevism.

There are forces in Armenia that could take the responsibility to change the behavior of the country. These are people who really think about the preservation of statehood.”

https://jam-news.net/how-to-ensure-armenias-security/

Turkish Press: Azerbaijan, Armenia revive talks on border delimitation amid peace efforts

Kanayan Tamar
Anadolu Agency, Turkey
Nov 30 2023
Burç Eruygur

ISTANBUL 

Azerbaijan and Armenia revived talks Thursday on border delimitation as peace efforts intensified. 

A statement by the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry said the fifth meeting of the State Commission on the Delimitation of the State Border between Baku and Yerevan was held on the border between the two countries.

It indicated that the meeting took place under the chairmanship of the Azerbaijani and Armenian prime ministers and said the parties discussed “several organizational and procedural matters and proceeded with their discussion on delimitation issues.”

The statement said both sides agreed to start working on talks for a draft regulation on joint activities of the state commission on border delimitation and the commission on the delimitation of the state border and border security.

“The parties also had come to an agreement to intensify the meetings of the commissions. The parties also agreed to determine the date and venue for the next meeting of the Commissions,” it said.

Relations between Baku and Yerevan have remained tense since 1991 when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent regions.

Most of the territory was liberated by Azerbaijan during a war in the fall of 2020, which ended after a Russian-brokered peace agreement that also opened the door to normalization.

Azerbaijan established full sovereignty in Karabakh after an "anti-terrorism operation" in September, after which separatist forces in the region surrendered.

Deputy Prime Minister emphasizes the EU’s support in overcoming challenges caused by forced displacement of NK people

Kanayan Tamar

 19:52,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 28, ARMENPRESS.  Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Khachatryan on November 28 met with the members of the Joint Delegation of the European External Action Service and the European Commission Directorates-General for Neighborhood and Enlargement Negotiations.
The head of the EU delegation in Armenia, Ambassador Vassilis Maragos also attended the meeting.
The Deputy Prime Minister underscored the significance of the delegation's visit amidst the current challenges and then presented the participants of the meeting in detail with the measures implemented by the government aimed at addressing the primary needs of forcibly displaced persons from Nagorno-Karabakh. The Deputy Prime Minister emphasized the importance of the support of the European Union in overcoming the challenges due to the created situation, Deputy Prime Minister’s Office said in a statement.
According to the source, during the meeting, reference was made to the implementation of the Armenia-EU Comprehensive and Extended Partnership Agreement, as well as the course of cooperation in a number of directions within the framework of the EU Economic and Investment Plan. The participants also discussed opportunities for the development of Armenia-EU trade and economic relations.
It is mentioned that Deputy Prime Minister Khachatryan reiterated the government's commitment to broaden cooperation with the EU. He expressed the government's readiness to introduce new directions essential for sustainable economic development, enhance resilience, and diversify the economy, thereby enriching the bilateral agenda.