There Will Be Revolution In Armenia – Opposition Member

THERE WILL BE REVOLUTION IN ARMENIA – OPPOSITION MEMBER

September 25, 2013 | 13:46

YEREVAN. – A reform is no longer possible within the authorities, and
therefore there will be a revolution, no matter what we do in Armenia.

Armen Martirosyan, opposition Heritage Party Vice-Chairman and member
of the “Barev [Hello], Yerevan” faction at capital city Yerevan Council
of Elders, stated the aforesaid during a press conference on Wednesday.

“If something suddenly happens, it will be like a flood; the
disappointment exists. The public wants the unity of the opposition,”
he noted.

As per Martirosyan, the Armenian authorities attempt to ensure their
legitimacy by way of receiving help from abroad, and they give some
things in return.

“Today’s result is a result of illegitimate authorities. The
opposition forces, the body politic-which were prepared for a short
struggle, which did not try to create a single opposition front and
to struggle-have their fault here. The problems can be solved solely
in a united agenda,” he said.

Armen Martirosyan stressed that the opposition may have shortcomings
at most, whereas the authorities have guilt.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Views From Yerevan: Karabakh Should Be Opened Not Closed

VIEWS FROM YEREVAN: KARABAKH SHOULD BE OPENED NOT CLOSED
by David Stepanyan

arminfo
Wednesday, September 25, 13:05

Informal meetings of representatives of the Armenian and Azerbaijani
civic societies are quite rare. They meet only outside the region,
which makes such meetings expensive and not easy to organize. In
addition, Armenian analysts and civic society representatives cannot
travel to Azerbaijan, Director of the Caucasus Institute Alexander
Iskandaryan told ArmInfo.

“Meanwhile. foreign citizens visiting Nagorny Karabakh find themselves
in the ‘black lists of personas non-grata’ in Azerbaijan. I think,
it is necessary to do everything quite on the contrary in order to
avoid paranoidism characteristic to close societies. Karabakh should
be opened not closed. It is necessary to try to talk to the Karabakh
people. After all, Baku considers Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan, but
the citizens of Azerbaijan cannot travel to Karabakh,” he said. In
this light, the political scientist believes that Baku’s policy is
a failed PR.

Earlier on 23 September, Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry has removed
four foreigners from the list of the people, who have visited the
Nagorno Karabakh Republic. A member of Russia’s State Duma Alexei
Mitrofanov, head of the Moscow office ‘Voice of America’ James Brook ,
Johns Hopkins University students Ivan Benovich and Nicholas Vondra
are those ‘happy’ people that have been removed from the list of
“persona non grata” after expressing their sincere regret for visiting
Nagorno Karabakh.

They appealed to the government of Azerbaijan and expressed their
remorse, after which their names were removed from the list of
“persona non grata”. Azerbaijan has already blacklisted 300 prominent
and well-known people who ‘dared’ to visit Nagorno Karabakh ‘without
permission of Baku.’

"ONEArmenia" And "Sahman" NGO Raised Over $8,000 For Berkaber Projec

“ONEARMENIA” AND “SAHMAN” NGO RAISED OVER $8,000 FOR BERKABER PROJECT

September 25, 2013 | 02:36

YEREVAN. – Through the project of “ONEArmenia” designed to raise
money for bordering houses in Berkaber, located in the Tavush Region
of Armenia, a total of $8,095 was raised with $595 above the goal,
director of the organization “ONEArmenia” David Bequette told Armenian
News – NEWS.am.

“We got more than the amount of money we expected, and the
representatives of “Sahman” NGO have already been in Berkaber to start
construction of the next stage of greenhouses”, he noted, adding that
they are actually going to start another sustainability project there.

David Bequette hopes to start construction on October 10 and finish
the greenhouses before the winter.

He noted that the representatives of “Sahman” NGO visited the two
previous greenhouses and they both have become success stories:
the first one is already selling its harvest in the local market,
while the second owner has started building his own greenhouse.

On August 7, “ONEArmenia” launched its fourth campaign to help build
sustainable greenhouses for over 500 residents in the border village
of Berkaber, located in the Tavush Region in northeastern Armenia. The
project includes the building of greenhouses, the trainings, the seeds,
as well as budget training on how to keep and maintain greenhouses.

For the past 20 years, the farmers in Berkaber have not been able to
farm because their land, located on the other side of the village’s
reservoir, is under the occupation of Azerbaijani forces.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Armenia Lost Its European Prospect – European Parliament Member

ARMENIA LOST ITS EUROPEAN PROSPECT – EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MEMBER

September 25, 2013 | 12:26

It is not that Europe lost Armenia, but rather Armenia lost its
European prospect; this is the correct approach.

Elmar Brok, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European
Parliament and Vice-Chair of the European People’s Party, told the
aforesaid toRFE/RL Armenian service.

“And Armenia had this loss because of an incredibly great pressure
by Russia, which was pressuring with the security matter,” he added.

“This is why I have to say that such pressures by Russia, to prevent
the countries’ sovereign decisions to join the union of their choice,
is simply unacceptable,” Elmar Brok stated.

To note, following the talks that were held on September 3 in Moscow
between Armenian and Russian Presidents Serzh Sargsyan and Vladimir
Putin, Sargsyan had announced that Armenia plans to join the Customs
Union and subsequently engage in the formation of the Eurasian
Economic Union.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Zhoghovurd: Armenian Economists To Negotiate CU Membership Procedure

ZHOGHOVURD: ARMENIAN ECONOMISTS TO NEGOTIATE CU MEMBERSHIP PROCEDURES IN RUSSA

11:08 ~U 25.09.13

Upon his return from Sochi, Russia, where he was taking part in the
Collective Security Treaty Organization’s summit, President Serzh
Sargsyan reportedly issued an instruction for sending a delegation
of knowledgeable Armenian economists to the country.

Citing its sources, the paper says that the president expects the
delegation to inform the Russian side of the possible economic risks
that the country may face in case of joining the Eurasian Customs
Union.

“The group, headed by President of the Armenian Union of Manufacturers
and Businessmen Arsen Ghazaryan will leave for the Russian capital
today to discuss with Russian experts and the chairman of the Eurasian
Economic Commission Board, Victor Christenko, the mechanisms of a
united Customs zone with Armenia in the absence of a common border.

Considering the haste with which the group was formed, it is easy to
guess that the Russians wish to maximum accelerate Armenia’s membership
in the Customs Union,” the paper comments.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Selon Un Expert L’Armenie Peut Profiter Des Avantages Du Couloir Rus

SELON UN EXPERT L’ARMENIE PEUT PROFITER DES AVANTAGES DU COULOIR RUSSIE-EURASIE SI LE TRONCON FERROVIAIRE ABKHAZE OUVRE

ARMENIE

L’Armenie peut profiter des avantages du corridor eurasien que
la Russie a propose d’ouvrir si le chemin de fer qui s’etend sur
l’Abkhazie separatiste s’ouvre a declare Aram Safaryan, responsable
d’une ONG appelee ” integration et developpement “. Le couloir du
projet s’etend de la region de l’extreme-Orient a la frontière de
l’Union europeenne.

” Les specialistes ont calcule que si ce corridor fonctionne
correctement, en conformite avec ses règlements techniques et
economiques, le transport de fret de l’Extreme-Orient vers l’Europe
prendra moins de temps, jusqu’a 50 jours, a l’avenir, grâce a
d’immenses investissements publics, et cela peut devenir meilleur
marche ” a declare Aram Safaryan.

” Mais seule l’ouverture de la section abkhaze du chemin de fer
donnerait cet avantage a l’Armenie “.

Aram Safaryan a dit que si le chemin de fer abkhaze commence a
fonctionner cela serait benefique pour le commerce de l’Armenie avec
la Russie et ses partenaires.

” La Chine est notre deuxième partenaire commercial après la Russie,
et le premier partenaire, si la composante du gaz n’est pas prise en
compte. Notre chiffre d’affaires des echanges s’est eleve a près de
500 millions de dollars en 2012 “.

Aram Safaryan a egalement declare que les prix des marchandises
chinoises peuvent baisser si la section abkhaze s’ouvre.

mercredi 25 septembre 2013, Stephane ©armenews.com

La Securite Nationale De L’Armenie En Peril Par La Migration Croissa

LA SECURITE NATIONALE DE L’ARMENIE EN PERIL PAR LA MIGRATION CROISSANTE SELON LE DASHNAKTSUTIUN

ARMENIE

La migration menace la securite nationale du pays a declare Armen
Rustamyan, le chef de la faction de la Federation revolutionnaire
armenienne a l’Assemblee nationale lors d’une rencontre avec des
journalistes pour presenter le programme social du parti appele ”
Nous allons vivre dans notre pays “.

Il a egalement souligne le manque de conscrits dans l’armee armenienne.

” Il y a des lacunes dans d’autres domaines “, a-t-il dit.

Le programme se compose de 11 sections ciblant divers domaines,
notamment l’economie, la politique et l’education.

Dans son programme, le parti Dashnaktsutiun propose de separer le
monde des affaires et la politique, de poursuivre une juste politique
de ressources humaine, de rendre les activites des fonctionnaires
plus transparents et responsables, de donner aux jeunes la place
pour traduire leurs ambitions en realite, de creer de nouveaux
emplois, de rendre la politique fiscale et douanière plus previsible
afin de stimuler les investissements, de realiser une transition
vers l’agriculture industrielle et d’accroître la qualite et la
disponibilite de l’education.

Armen Rustamyan a declare que la federation revolutionnaire armenienne
s’est lancee dans ce programme il y a quelques mois.

” Nous avons tenu une serie de discussions de fond sur diverses
plates-formes professionnelles, et nous avions besoin de commencer une
nouvelle etape aujourd’hui ” a-t-il dit, ajoutant que les discussions
se continuent sur d’autres plates-formes et soulignant que ce document
n’est pas un projet ordinaire du parti – il revendique le statut du
programme national.

Le chef de la faction a egalement declare que le parti est pret a
cooperer avec d’autres, non seulement les partis de l’opposition,
dans la mise en ~uvre de ce programme.

” Les autorites doivent comprendre que la poursuite de cette situation
signifie l’auto-destruction, et nous esperons qu’il y a des gens qui
comprendront egalement parmi les fonctionnaires ” a-t-il dit.

La population de l’Armenie s’est contracte de 15000 personnes depuis
le debut de cette annee.

Selon les rapports en juin 2013, il y avait 3 011 900 citoyens dans
le pays dont 1 904 400 vivaient dans les villes et 1 107 500 dans
les zones rurales.

mercredi 25 septembre 2013, Stephane ©armenews.com

L’UD Et Le Karabagh : L’integration De L’Armenie Dans Le Bloc Dirige

L’UD ET LE KARABAGH : L’INTEGRATION DE L’ARMENIE DANS LE BLOC DIRIGE PAR LA RUSSIE SIGNIFIE UNE NOUVELLE ETAPE DANS LE REGLEMENT DES CONFLITS

ARMENIE

Le sujet du Haut-Karabagh est devenue plus d’actualite a la lumière
de l’accord du president d’Armenie d’adherer a l’Union Douanière (UD)
dirigee par la Russie. La decision annoncee le 3 Septembre a donne
lieu a des affirmations selon lesquelles une nouvelle etape va voir
le jour dans le règlement et que la concurrence entre l’Occident et
la Russie autour de cette question deviendra plus rigide.

Le nouveau co-president americain du Groupe de Minsk de l’OSCE,
James Warlick, qui a visite la region la semaine dernière, a declare
qu’un nouveau ” chemin realiste ” devrait etre trouve pour resoudre
le conflit. Il suggère de faire avancer la creation de mesures de
confiance et de contacts afin d’aider a resoudre comme le conflit ”
gele ” et preserver le statu quo.

Ni l’Armenie, ni les responsables russes ont dit un mot sur la facon
dont le Karabagh serait lie a l’Union douanière. Le ministre armenien
des Affaires Etrangères Edouard Nalbandian a note seulement que le
Karabagh ne devrait pas souffrir de la nouvelle situation. De nombreux
responsables estiment toutefois qu’il n’y a pas d’accords clairs sur
ce point.

Mais au niveau des experts, il y a des opinions que, selon les souhaits
de l’Armenie et de l’Azerbaïdjan de s’integrer dans la communaute
eurasiatique, la Russie pourrait prendre des mesures actives sur le
Karabagh. C’est peut-etre meme la reconnaissance du Karabagh comme
une revanche sur l’Azerbaïdjan, ou une ” petite guerre ” avec la
division du Karabagh – si l’Armenie se comporte mal.

L’expert azerbaïdjanais Rauf Mirkadyrov croit generalement que
la Russie ne pourrait tout simplement pas reconnaître le Karabagh
comme partie integrante. Par ailleurs, dans quelques semaines, le
200e anniversaire du Traite de Gulistan sera marque et vertu de ce
traite la partie du Karabakh de l’Armenie est passe du contrôle perse
a celui de la Russie.

Mais il semble que l’Europe a decide d’etablir des liens plus etroits
et des relations directes avec le Karabagh. Au cours des derniers
jours Stepanakert a ete visite par des membres des parlements danois
et allemands, ainsi que des representants de marques europeennes
bien connues, qui ont annonce des plans pour etablir des usines de
confection au Haut-Karabagh.

En outre, a la lumière de l’adhesion de l’Armenie a l’Union Douanière
des fonctionnaires europeens ont declare qu’il est temps que l’Europe
renforce son rôle dans les negociations sur le règlement du Karabagh.

Le 2 octobre, lorsque le president armenien Serge Sarkissian va prendre
la aprole lors de la session de l’APCE a Strasbourg dans le cadre de
l’achèvement de la presidence de l’Armenie du Conseil de l’Europe,
les questions liees au règlement du Karabagh sont susceptibles d’etre
evoquees.

Au Karabagh lui-meme les responsables semblent etre un peu indifferent
a ces processus. Par exemple le secretaire de presse du president du
Karabagh David Babayan, a dit ” que diplomatiquement l’Armenie et le
Nagorno-Karabakh doivent avoir de bonnes relations avec tous les pays
où il y a une diaspora armenienne “.

Et le Premier ministre du Karabagh Ara Harutyunyan, parlant aux
medias, a declare que le Karabagh ne doit pas etre melange dans les
relations armeno-russes. Il a mis en garde : si nous parlons beaucoup
du Karabagh, nous pourrions abîmer ce que nous avons la par defaut.

Que va donner l’adhesion de l’Armenie a l’Union douanière pour le
Karabagh ? Dans une interview avec Deutsche Welle le politologue et
ancien conseiller du president americain sur la securite nationale
Zbigniew Brzezinski, repondant a la question de savoir qu’est-ce qui
se cache derrière la creation de l’Union douanière de la Russie, la
Bielorussie et le Kazakhstan, a declare qu’en fait, il y a meme rien
de cache. Selon lui, il est bien evident que l’essence de l’Union
est d’essayer de dompter les pays post-sovietiques independant les
uns après les autres.

Par Naira Hayrumyan

ArmeniaNow

mercredi 25 septembre 2013, Stephane ©armenews.com

Tied To The Land: Documenting Western Armenia

TIED TO THE LAND: DOCUMENTING WESTERN ARMENIA

By George Aghjayan // September 24, 2013 in Featured, Headline, Opinion

Each time I return from Western Armenia, the reaction I get from
family and friends is the same: Why? Why do I subject myself to the
emotionally draining experience of viewing first-hand the destruction
of Armenian cultural heritage? Viewing my pictures only deepens their
conviction that they could not make such a trip.

Armenian monastery in Moks near Van. (Photo by George Aghjayan)

Beyond the emotional strain, many Armenians view traveling to Western
Armenia as counter to our national interests. One argument is that
such travel by Armenians contributes to the Turkish tourism industry.

Another argument against documenting the remaining evidence of
Armenian heritage is that it exposes these structures to further
destruction. Lastly, many will never feel secure traveling to the
region as long as it is part of Turkey.

It is not my intent to dispel these reasons as unjustified. Quite
honestly, travel to Western Armenia is not for everyone. However,
I think it is important to explain why I, personally, have made this
journey a number of times over the past three years.

The first reason is rather clear. I spend significant time researching
and documenting the previously Armenian villages of Western Armenia.

Many of the names of the villages have been changed and a large number
of villages no longer exist. There is only so much research that can
be done through books and other sources; field research is a critical
component. The history of the villages as well as the significant
Armenian structures that remain are retained by the local population.

Oftentimes, it is the only way to verify the location as well as the
current state of these monuments.

On a recent trip, we were in a village just on the other side of
a hill from the Armenian monastery we were looking for. We asked a
local child where the Armenian church was, but he didn’t know what
we were talking about. Finally, he said, “You mean where the gold
is?” Time and time again, in every location, there is evidence of the
treasure-seekers that operated with total disregard for the damage
they inflicted on the structures. This is not a new phenomenon; it has
been going on for centuries on these lands. Today, it is in search
of Armenian gold. A hundred years ago it was in search of Hittite,
Assyrian, and Urartuan gold.

Where exactly do they think the Armenians got all this gold and other
wealth? The villages have not changed in 100 years, and all of the
resources available to Armenians then are still available in the
villages today. It is not as if the Armenians had a gold mine. The
gold the locals search for does not exist. The small amount of wealth
that industrious Armenians were able to miraculously accumulate has
long since disappeared. I do have one hope, though: that each church
and monastery had important records and that, one day, some of these
lost treasures will be found in the homes of villagers and returned
to their rightful owners.

Some will point to these few examples as evidence that traveling
to Armenian monasteries and churches only promotes the notion that
treasure is buried there. This impression is further strengthened
when traveling with detailed maps, as I do. Yet, for over 60 years,
very few Armenians ever traveled to Western Armenia, and it is not as
if Armenian monuments were all preserved during those years. Quite
the contrary, hundreds of churches, schools, and monasteries were
destroyed during those years without witnesses.

Yes, the destruction continues unabated, but by traveling year after
year, the destruction can be documented and exposed. Exposing it has
raised awareness in important circles. It is yet to be seen if that
will yield positive results. However, ignoring the destruction has
not stopped it. That is undeniable.

Recently, I read two exceptional articles, one by Varak Ketsemanian
(“Dersim: A Facet of the Silent Revolution in Turkey”) and the other
by Raffi Bedrosyan (“Remembering the Dead and Living Victims of
the Armenian Genocide”). Both touched on another important aspect
of traveling to Western Armenia-the Armenians who still remain on
that land.

There are many things that have changed over the past decade in Turkey:
the murder of Hrant Dink, the publication of Fethiye Cetin’s book My
Grandmother, the reopening of Surp Giragos church in Diyarbakir. Each
of these events, and others, have contributed to an awakening of
“Armenianness” on our ancestral lands. Maybe it is not so much an
awakening as it is allowing a presence that never ended to once again
assert itself.

While the movement is still small-almost unnoticeable to most-it
is growing and our continued presence on the land is an important
component to process. Personally, it is very rewarding for me to meet
those that have retained their connection to Armenians through the
decades since the genocide. In fact, I view this as just one component
of the demographic crisis Armenians face. There is the exodus from the
Republic of Armenia, the turmoil in important diasporan communities
(Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon), the assimilation of Armenians in the
diaspora, and the “hidden” and assimilated thousands in Western
Armenia. We cannot ignore any one of these.

Finally, related to this last point, there is the mantra of a free,
independent, and united Armenia. I believe this to be an achievable
goal. It is one thing to not believe it to be possible, it is another
to believe yet have no plan to achieve it. For me, the way is clear:
For the Armenian presence to truly return to our lands, it is critical
to assimilate back into Armenian culture the thousands that still
live on the land. They are thirsting for it!

If we remain absent, think of the message that is sent to the
government in Turkey and the people on the ground. I go because it is
important for me to show that even though I was born in the diaspora,
of diasporan parents, after 100 years I am still tied to that land. I
cannot be separated from it!

When I step foot on the land, see the mountains, drink the water…I
feel my blood is from the soil and my ancestors are calling.

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2013/09/24/tied-to-the-land-documenting-western-armenia/

BAKU: Azerbaijani Embassy In Canada Checks Information About MP’s Il

AZERBAIJANI EMBASSY IN CANADA CHECKS INFORMATION ABOUT MP’S ILLEGAL VISIT TO NAGORNO KARABAKH

Trend, Azerbaijan
Sept 24 2013

Azerbaijan, Baku, September 23 /Trend, S. Agayeva/

The Azerbaijani embassy in Canada is checking information about the
illegal visit of this county’s MP Jim Karygiannis to the breakaway
Nagorno Karabakh region, spokesman for the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry
Elman Abdullayev said in a briefing on Monday.

“The Foreign Ministry has already given the relevant instructions to
the Azerbaijani embassy in Canada,” he said.

Information about the visit of a Canadian MP to Azerbaijan’s occupied
territories was spread by an Armenian Media outlet today.

Earlier, four foreign citizens on a black list of Azerbaijan’s Foreign
Ministry for their illegal trip to the Azerbaijani territories occupied
by Armenia, were excluded from it.

They pointed out in their appeals that they were brought to
Azerbaijan’s occupied territories by fraud.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 per cent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, Russia, France and the U.S. are
currently holding peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.