Plus de 3,2 millions de tonnes de cargaisons et 415 000 passagers tr

ARMENIE
Plus de 3,2 millions de tonnes de cargaisons et 415 000 passagers
transportés par train en 2013

La compagnie des chemins de fer du Caucase du Sud a transporté 3,27
millions de tonnes de cargaisons et 415 400 passagers en 2013 a
rapporté le service de presse de la société.

Selon le communiqué de presse, le trafic de fret des chemins de fer a
diminué de 5,3% en 2013, par rapport à l’année précédente, alors que
le trafic passager a augmenté de 4% à 52,99 millions de
passagers-kilomètres en 2012 à 55,12 millions de passagers-kilomètres
en 2013.

Quelques 456 000 tonnes ont été transportés en dehors de l’Arménie et
1 260 700 tonnes ont été importées et 1 558 500 tonnes ont transités à
l’intérieur du pays.

samedi 5 avril 2014,
Stéphane (c)armenews.com

Seyran Ohanyan to be appointed PM, Vladimir Gasparyan to become DM,

Seyran Ohanyan to be appointed PM, Vladimir Gasparyan to become
defense minister, Armen Yeritsyan – police chief

12:30 / 05.04.2014

Till April 8 names of tens possible candidates for the post of
Armenian PM will be circulated, but according to Nyut.am source Serzh
Sargsyan has clearly decided to appoint Seyran Ohanyan in this post.

The ongoing political consultations are aimed at getting opinions
about Seyran Ohanyan’s appointment. Seyran Ohanyan is non-party. Some
people say he is not seeking to get the post being an honest, modest
person not able to lie. These features do not fit the PM, according to
some opinions.

Anyway, if Seyran Ohanyan is appointed in the post, the president will
make reshufflings in the defense sphere. The president will appoint
incumbent police chief Vladimir Gasparyan as defense minister and
emergency situations minister Armen Yeritsyan chief of the police.
The other appointments depend on two approaches – if it is decided to
create national consent government, the chairs will be distributed
among the Republican, Prosperous Armenia, ARF-D, Armenian National
Congress and Heritage parties. If this variant fails to work Serzh
Sargsyan will remain in front of ‘broken basin’ and appoint only
Republican party members in the new posts and give some two to Rule of
Law.

http://nyut.am/archives/158161?lang=en

Le gouvernement d’Arménie va utiliser un emprunt russe pour l’allong

ARMENIE
Le gouvernement d’Arménie va utiliser un emprunt russe pour l’allonger
la durée de vie de la centrale nucléaire

Le gouvernement d’Arménie examinera le projet d’extension de
l’exploitation de la deuxième unité de la centrale nucléaire
arménienne (APM) lors de sa prochaine séance.

Dans le cadre du projet de décret du gouvernement le ministre des
Finances David Sarkissian sera chargé de prendre des mesures pour la
signature d’un accord de prêt entre l’Arménie et la Russie.

Le ministre de l’énergie et des ressources naturelles Armen Movsisian
sera chargé d’organiser la signature d’un accord entre la centrale
nucléaire arménienne et la société russe Rosatom sur une étude de
faisabilité d’une éventuelle extension des opérations de la centrale.

Après l’achèvement de la première étape, une vérification des risques
professionnels doit être effectuée dans un délai de deux mois. En cas
de conclusions positives de l’audit un accord sur les préparatifs pour
les opérations de prolongation sera signé dans un délai d’un mois.

samedi 5 avril 2014,
Stéphane (c)armenews.com

Kessab, Shoushi, même Combat… ? Par Haytoug Chamlian

OPINION
Kessab, Shoushi, même Combat… ? Par Haytoug Chamlian

La chute de la ville de Kessab, aux confins de la Syrie actuelle et de
notre Cilicie – question de point de vue – , a mis les Arméniens du
monde entier en état de choc.

Faute d’informations suffisantes – ou suffisamment fiables -, il est
illusoire de tenter de comprendre ce qui s’y déroule véritablement en
ce moment.

Une seule donnée est cependant certaine : au moment où nous écrivons
ces lignes, la ville est toujours entre les mains de djihadistes de
diverses provenances, qui bénéficient dans cette opération
spectaculaire du soutien immédiat de la Turquie.

Nous avons tous accompli notre devoir, et nous continuerons à le
faire, afin de soutenir Kessab et sa population arménienne. Autant que
faire ce peut, eu égard aux circonstances. En effet, en cette affaire,
nous sommes en terrain particulièrement… désobligeante, et cette
fois-ci non seulement en Diaspora occidentale, mais même au
Proche-Orient. Quant à l’Arménie et à l’Artsakh, ils ont démontré en
cette matière une sollicitude, un esprit de corps et une solidarité
remarquables, un engagement réel et sans faille, s’inscrivant dans la
logique de tout ce qu’ils font et accomplissent déjà, effectivement et
assidument, pour soutenir les Arméniens de Syrie et leur porter
assistance, et ce, depuis le début des hostilités dans ce pays.

Cela étant dit – et fait – , il conviendrait de se pencher sur ce
sujet dans une autre perspective.

Tous comptes faits, avons-nous, Arméniens, failli envers Kessab ?
Aurions-nous dû défendre nous-mêmes cet ultime bout de Cilicie , par
une mobilisation combattante panarménienne ?

L’analogie applicable à cet égard serait ce qui constitua la phase
initiale et cruciale de la guerre de libération de l’Artsakh,
culminant avec la victoire de Shoushi. Sans laquelle, cette région
arménienne n’aurait pas pu être libérée (sauf à parfaire).

Alors, Kessab et Shoushi, même Combat ? Du moins au niveau de l’étape
à court terme, sinon, pour le moment, d’un objectif final…

Sur le plan idéologique, l’argument est certes valable. Cependant, il
ne résiste pas au test élémentaire de la réalité et des faits.

Aujourd’hui, contrairement à d’autres époques révolues, la Diaspora ne
dispose pas de >.

Lorsque les djihadistes ont attaqué Kessab avec le soutien logistique
de la Turquie, la Diaspora arménienne était donc tout simplement
incapable d’y mener un combat armé, avec les Arméniens de Syrie au
premier rang. Comme cela fut fait, mutatis mutandis, en Artsakh, à
Shouchi.

Pour ce qui est spécifiquement du potentiel de combat armé des
Arméniens de Syrie mêmes, il faut souligner que cela avait été
éradiqué depuis fort longtemps, avec les compliments des prédécesseurs
du régime Assad actuel, et ce, par des moyens d’une férocité inouïe.

Quant à la thèse d’une intervention armée à partir de
l’Arménie/Artsakh, elle relève également du romantisme superficiel. En
effet, il n’y plus de combattants en Arménie et en Artsakh – Dieu
merci – . Il y a des soldats. Il y a une armée nationale. En
conséquence, l’intervention de militaires Arméniens à Kessab, pour se
battre aux côtés de l’armée syrienne et contre des forces soutenues
par laTurquie, le tout, sur fond de sérieux accrochages continuels sur
les fronts de l’Artsakh et du Nord-Est de l’Arménie même, ainsi que
dans un contexte d’exacerbation extrême de la guerre dite froide sur
le front ukrainien… il s’agit là d’un scénario impensable.

Mais en revenant à la Diaspora, étant entendu qu’elle n’avait pas les
moyens de mener un combat armé à Kessab, ne devait-elle pas alors
organiser au moins, convenablement, une évacuation digne et ordonnée
de la ville ? Or, tout ce qu’on a entendu à ce sujet indique plutôt un
état de confusion totale à cet égard également, entre la panique
approximative et le sauve-qui-peut improvisé, ayant notamment pour
effet de laisser les éléments les plus vulnérables e la population à
la merci des envahisseurs. Ainsi, deux mamigs se sont même retrouvées
soudain en Turquie ! Et qu’on n’ose pas parler d’effet de surprise, de
grce, cet événement était certainement prévisible, hautement probable
même, depuis deux ans.

Mais ce n’est pas fini encore, hélas… Non seulement la Diaspora
était incapable d’assurer la protection des Arméniens de Kessab, non
seulement elle n’a même pas pu organiser leur fuite, mais pour
couronner le tout, à ce jour encore, le mot d’ordre d’une certaine FRA
demeure en vigueur, exhortant les Arméniens de Syrie à rester en
Syrie…

Cette posture est non seulement abjecte en raison de l’impuissance
totale du même parti à assurer la sécurité de nos compatriotes en
cause, mais elle constitue également une violation flagrante de
l’idéologie fondamentale, du Programme plus que centenaire, de l’me
même de ce parti, étant donné qu’au même moment où celui-ci demande
aux Arméniens de rester mourir en Syrie (pour quoi, pour qui,
exactement… ?), la Mère Patrie, elle, ouvre grand ses bras pour
accueillir ces Arméniens, assurer leur survie physique, et leur offrir
au moins un avenir quelconque.

À ce stade-ci de cette réflexion, il convient de souligner aussi la
grave responsabilité de Bachar El Assad dans la situation actuelle de
Kessab. Car elle ne se limite pas au fait susmentionné que le régime
dont il est le successeur dans tous les sens du terme s’était
chargée… d'”assagir” sérieusement les Arméniens de Syrie.

Pour ne pas trop donner de l’eau au moulin de celui qui est devenu à
présent un ennemi commun des Arméniens, des chiites et autres
alaouites , rappelons rapidement, voire furtivement, les quelques
réalités suivantes seulement :

pour ce qui est de l’ennemi commun, justement, il n’en fut pas
toujours ainsi, loin de là… ;

c’est le régime syrien en cause qui avait fait une croix (si l’on
peut dire…) sur le Sandjak d’Alexandrette, et ce faisant, avait
largement amoindri toute importance de Kessab au niveau de certaines
aspirations de restitution… ; tout en encourageant, du même coup,
les velléités expansionnistes d’Ankara, au nom de l'”intégrité
territoriale” de “son” Sandjak. Ce qui n’est pas sans rappeler
d’ailleurs les postures – et postillons – d’un Aliev à l’égard de
l’Artsakh…

Assad père et fils ont également veillé à la “dilution” systématique
de la population originelle de Kessab ; en 1974, déjà, lorsque Kessab
n’était alors qu’un grand village entourés de petits villages et que
tout ce secteur était exclusivement peuplés d’Arméniens, en y arrivant
pour la première fois, le soussigné, adolescent, avait été choqué d’y
voir, avant tout, une immense mosquée, sciemment dressée à l’entrée
principale de la bourgade… ; par la suite, forcément sous la
houlette des dirigeants de Damas, les Arméniens ont graduellement cédé
la place, jusqu’à ne plus représenter qu’une proportion – en voie
d’érosion continuelle encore – non seulement de la population mais
même des propriétaires fonciers des lieux.

Pour faire bonne mesure, ayons aussi le courage de mentionner une
certaine responsabilité des nôtres. Car il y a eu abandon physique de
Kessab, par voie d’émigration continue, en tout temps ; en pleine Pax
Syriana même, donc bien avant le début de quelque indice de
bouleversements. De surcroît, il y a eu aussi une tendance à disposer
un peu trop htivement de biens et terres ancestraux, au profit de
non-Arméniens. (Désolé pour cette dérogation à la “rectitude
politique” interne, mais nous comparons ici Kessab à Shoushi, rien de
moins, et il aurait donc été injuste envers nos compatriotes d’Artsakh
de ne pas relever cette différence notoire aussi, entre les deux
situations… Tout en rappelant à quelle sorte et à quel degré
d’adversité ces derniers ont fait face, notamment durant la longue
période de domination azérie, et ce, avec des moyens de résistance
dérisoires…)

À lumière de toutes les observations exposées ci-dessus, force est
donc de constater que la seule action que nous pouvons mener
aujourd’hui pour sauver Kessab se situe strictement sur le plan
politique.

Or, s’il s’agit là d’une obligation de moyen à laquelle nous ne
saurions nous dérober, il ne faudra pas se faire d’illusions, sur le
plan des résultats. D’une part, parce que dans un conflit armé de
cette nature et de cette envergure, les démarches politiques sont en
tout cas vaines, et encore plus, lorsqu’elles se limitent au niveau
gentiment “citoyen”. D’autres part, parce qu’en ce qui concerne la
plupart des pays de la diaspora, les Arméniens frappent à la mauvaise
porte… En l’occurrence, celle de ceux-là mêmes qui ont ouvert et qui
tiennent la porte par laquelle sont entrés allègrement les
envahisseurs de Kessab…

Sauf si, avec l’assentiment de Bachar El Assad, le secteur est destiné
à devenir une >, Kessab pourra être encore libéré.
Enfin… Pour revenir, pour le moment, à la Syrie. .. Cela dit, eu
égard à la mobilisation mondiale des Arméniens – surtout en Occident
-, dressés dans un élan inhabituellement uni et coordonné pour se
porter au secours de Kessab, Bachar El Assad pourrait même être tenté
de prendre tout son temps, avant de refouler éventuellement les intrus
venus de Turquie… Histoire de profiter le plus possible des effets
de ce “lobby” international inespéré, dans des pays où lui-même ne
pourra plus jamais remettre les pieds.

En dernière analyse, tout comme dans le cas de l’Artsakh, le sort de
Kessab dépend, ultimement du déroulement du conflit titanesque entre
l’Ouest et l’Est. Et plus spécifiquement, des plans de Vladimir
Poutine.

Et c’est bien là, en définitive, le seul véritable point commun entre
Kessab et Shoushi : le sort ultime de ces terres arméniennes dépend du
régime actuel de Moscou. Et pas seulement de ces terres, d’ailleurs…

Ce qui nous met, nous, citoyens d’États occidentaux, dans une
situation hautement problématique. Pour le moins dire.

Me Haytoug Chamlian

Montréal, 04 avril 2014

samedi 5 avril 2014,
Ara (c)armenews.com

Lilit Mkrtchyan championne d’Allemagne avec son club de Bad Königsho

ECHECS
Lilit Lazarian championne d’Allemagne avec son club de Bad Königshofen

Lilit Lazarian qui fait partie de la sélection nationale d’Arménie a
été consacrée championne d’Allemagne avec son équipe de Bad
Königshofen. En finale, son équipe s’est imposée sur Baden-Baden sur
le score de 3,5-2,5. C’est Lilit Lazarian qui a donné la victoire à
son club en ramenant le point de la victoire face à Anna Zatonskih
(Etats-Unis).

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 5 avril 2014,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

Peace of Art : << Il est temps de passer les menottes aux criminels

Génocide des Arméniens
Peace of Art : >

A l’occasion de la 99ème commémoration du génocide des Arméniens, la
ville de Boston (Massachusetts), avec le parrainage de l’organisation
Peace of Art, a mis en place plusieurs panneaux, aux points
stratégiques de la ville, en hommage aux victimes du génocide des
Arméniens, ainsi qu’aux survivants.

C’est en 1996 que le fondateur de Peace of Art, Daniel Varoujan
Hejinian, a lancé cet annuel rendez-vous commémoratif, appelant le
président des États-Unis, l’ONU et la communauté internationale à
reconnaître le génocide des Arméniens.

aux
criminels. Pour ceux qui pensent qu’après la mort du dernier
survivant, il n’y aura pas d’autres témoins, et qu’avec le temps le
génocide arménien sera oublié, sachez que tous les Arméniens sont des
survivants du génocide, et aussi longtemps que le génocide arménien ne
sera toujours pas reconnu par la Turquie, des millions d’Arméniens
partout dans le monde exigeront la reconnaissance et la justice “. A
déclaré le président de Peace of Art, Inc, Daniel Varoujan Hejinian.

Le logo rappelle le nombre 100 pour le centième anniversaire et le
bracelet symbolise le génocide arménien nié par les auteurs et leurs
partisans.

samedi 5 avril 2014,
Jean Eckian (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=98757

BAKU: French President’s Visit To Support Settlement Of Nagorno-Kara

FRENCH PRESIDENT’S VISIT TO SUPPORT SETTLEMENT OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

Trend, Azerbaijan
April 4 2014

Baku, Azerbaijan, April 4

By Ilhama Isabalayeva -Trend:

French President Francois Hollande’s visit to Azerbaijan is of great
political importance, French ambassador to Azerbaijan Pascal Monnier
told the media on April 4.

“The French president will visit Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia,”
he said.

“The main purpose of the visit is to support the settlement of the
Armenian -Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict peacefully,” he said.

“I think that the conflict settlement will create more opportunities
for both parties. This is a sovereign region, which may shape its
future. We support peace and friendship between the countries of
the region.”

President Hollande will pay an official visit to Azerbaijan this
year at the invitation of the Azerbaijani counterpart. There is no
information about the exact date of the visit.

The French president confirmed his intention to visit Azerbaijan at
a meeting with Azerbaijani ambassador to France Elchin Amirbayov.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan.

Armenian armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since
1992, including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding
districts.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, Russia, France and the U.S. are
currently holding peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.

Rebel Assault On Kasab, Syria, Revives Dark Memories For Armenians

REBEL ASSAULT ON KASAB, SYRIA, REVIVES DARK MEMORIES FOR ARMENIANS

Los Angeles Times, CA
April 4 2014

It’s unclear how many died in the attack in Latakia province, but
much of the anger is directed at Turkey for allegedly facilitating it.

BEIRUT — A rebel assault on the northern Syrian town of Kasab near
the Turkish border has sparked a furor among Armenians worldwide and
revived dark memories of the Ottoman-era genocide.

It’s unclear how many civilian casualties occurred in the previously
tranquil home to about 2,500 Armenian Christians. But the incident,
which has also heightened tension between Turkey and Syria, provides
a sharp new focus for the propaganda wars between the government of
Syrian President Bashar Assad and the disparate rebel forces that
have been trying to topple him for three years.

It has also triggered a raging battle on social media, with
pro-opposition activists on the defensive against what they call
an Internet disinformation campaign by supporters of the Assad
government. Syrian officials, meanwhile, have accused Turkey of backing
an Al Qaeda-led offensive from its territory with tanks and aircraft.

Thousands of Syrian rebels, many of them with Islamist radical groups,
including some linked to Al Qaeda, surged across the Turkish-Syrian
border March 21 and seized a swath of mountainous territory in
northwestern Syria’s Latakia province, including Kasab.

Many residents of the town have since fled, like their ancestors who
survived the genocide of the early 20th century, joining the legions
of Syrians displaced by the war. The United Nations says about 1,550
displaced families from Kasab are receiving aid in the city of Latakia,
which is under Syrian government control.

The large-scale rebel strike appeared to catch the thinly stretched
Syrian military off guard, though the government says its forces
have won back terrain in a punishing counterattack close to the
porous border. Fierce fighting continued Thursday, both sides said. An
opposition monitoring group has reported more than 300 fighters killed,
including rebels and loyalists, while pro-government activists have
said that more than 1,000 rebels have been killed in almost two weeks
of clashes.

On March 28, hundreds of protesters gathered outside the Turkish
Consulate in Los Angeles to assail Turkey — which has called for
Assad’s ouster and has long harbored rebel fighters — for helping
facilitate the Kasab attack. Demonstrators waved U.S., Syrian and
Armenian flags and hoisted signs bearing messages such as “Freedom
from Turkish aggression.”

Among those plunging into the Internet fray is Kim Kardashian, a
Los Angeles-based celebrity of Armenian heritage, who has sent out
a number of messages on Twitter urging followers to marshal their
mobile devices in support of Kasab.

“If you don’t know what’s going on in Kessab please google it, its
heart breaking!” Kardashian tweeted, using an alternate spelling of
the town’s name. “Let’s get this trending!!!!”

During the Syrian conflict, now in its fourth year, social media and
the Internet have become virtual fronts in the war fueled by sectarian
rivalries and the geostrategic interests of other nations. Each side
has accused the other of inflammatory manipulation of online images and
serial distortion of events in an attempt to score propaganda points.

In the case of Kasab, the painful history of Armenians in Turkey
weighs heavily in the debate.

Armenian groups, scholars and many governments say Ottoman forces
committed genocide against ethnic Armenians during and after World
War I, killing more than a million people and driving multitudes from
their homes, including many who ended up in current-day Syria. Turkish
authorities have long denied any campaign of systematic extermination
and say those who died were casualties of war, famine and disease.

Syria’s Christian minority is generally seen as backing the Syrian
government, though many Christians also seek a more democratic
leadership.

Elsewhere in Syria, Islamist radicals have defaced churches and
kidnapped Christian clerics and nuns. A pair of bishops and an Italian
Jesuit priest, Paolo Dall’Oglio, have been among those abducted,
reportedly by Islamist rebels.

In Kasab, opposition forces have rejected Internet accounts of
Christians being killed and churches being vandalized.

“Our battle is not a sectarian one,” Ahmad Jarba, head of the
U.S.-backed Syrian National Coalition exiled opposition group,
said during a visit this week to a rebel-controlled area in Latakia
province, according to a video posted on YouTube. “Our battle is
with this ruling mafia…. It is not with the Alawites, nor with the
Armenians, or the Christians.”

Jarba’s visit highlighted the symbolic value the opposition places
on maintaining pressure on Assad’s native province, which is also
the homeland of his ultra-loyalist Alawite minority sect and of
many commanders in the Syrian military and security apparatus. Still,
experts say the likelihood of rebels pushing deep into heavily defended
Latakia appears slim.

With government forces advancing on several fronts and many rebels
turning in their weapons, the opposition has touted the Latakia
offensive as evidence that it can still strike at Assad’s ancestral
home and along the Mediterranean coast.

“Whoever thinks there is pressure on us to stop this battle is
delusional and wrong,” Jarba told the rebels gathered for his visit.

His appearance also dramatized how even “moderate” U.S.-backed
opposition groups like the Free Syrian Army — ostensibly under the
umbrella of Jarba’s coalition — coordinate in the field with extremist
Islamist factions. Both sides in the war have reported that the rebels
fighting in Latakia include elements of Al Nusra Front, an Al Qaeda
franchise deemed a terrorist organization by Washington. At least one
Free Syrian Army-affiliated faction, the Syrian Revolutionary Front,
is also participating.

In August, a rebel sweep into a different area of Latakia resulted in
the executions of scores of pro-government civilians and the kidnapping
of hundreds more, mostly women and children, in predominantly Alawite
villages, according to an investigation by Human Rights Watch, a New
York-based watchdog group. Many Alawite civilians remain hostages
from that offensive.

U.S. officials who back the Syrian opposition have voiced concern
about the makeup of the forces that overran Kasab. U.S. Sen. Robert
Menendez (D-N.J.), who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
said in a letter to constituents that he was “gravely concerned” about
reports of the attack “by Al Qaeda-linked terrorists based in Turkey.”

Times staff writer McDonnell reported from Beirut and special
correspondent Bulos from Amman, Jordan.

,0,2301911.story#axzz2xws5Ccgk

http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-syria-kassab-20140404

Armenian PM Sarkisyan Leaves, After All

ARMENIAN PM SARKISYAN LEAVES, AFTER ALL

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
April 4 2014

4 April 2014 – 9:21am

Susanna Petrosyan, Yerevan. Exclusively to Vestnik Kavkaza

Yesterday the Prime Minister of Armenia Tigran Sarkisyan surrendered
office, and President accepted the resignation at a session of the
board of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia. Right after the
session Sarkisyan left the building of the head office of the RPA
and didn’t answer a question whether his resignation was connected
with a verdict on the pension reform by the Constitutional Court.

The other day the Constitutional Court (CC) announced its verdict
on a suit of four opposition forces which demanded to find the law
on funded pension anti-constitutional. The CC’s verdict is based on
the legal rule which forbids any restriction of rights for citizens,
including the property right. The document points out necessity to
improve the law in the sphere of responsibility of state structures
and liabilities of pension funds.

The complicated and voluminous document adopted by the CC demands
attentive study, but the opposition has already expressed its attitude
to the verdict. According to an MP from the National Assembly from
the opposition Dashnaktsutyun Party, Artsvik Minasyan, the CC verdict
covered all aspects outlined in the suit by the opposition.

The court’s decision was a surprise for the opposition –
Dashnaktsutyun, the Armenian National Congress, Prosperous Armenia,
and Heritage. They thought that the CC which is an adjunct of the
authorities would make an unclear decision at best and wouldn’t
deprive the government of such a great amount of money.

Considering the Armenian specificity, for example, power
overconcentration in President’s hands, it is impossible to imagine
that there is no political component behind the legal verdict. The
CC verdict is a starting point in internal political processes in
the country which will define further behavior of two rivals – the
authorities and the opposition.

Funded pensions and dissatisfaction connected with them among the
majority of the population are only a part of the internal political
process aimed at holding radical reforms in the country, including
a shift in power.

Regarding the CC verdict, two scenarios could be implemented for the
authorities. The first determined the authorities’ behavior, according
to the well-known scheme in parliament, i.e. the boycotting of sessions
by the parliamentary majority or voting against any initiatives
by the opposition. The second scenario required a concession to
demands of the opposition on dismissal of the government headed by
Tigran Sarkisyan. It is unlikely, but the leadership could realize
that it was impossible to continue cheating on the society and make
unpopular decisions.

As for the opposition, before the CC verdict they have many times
stated that they intend to start a new stage of the struggle. “90%
of the population wants a change of the government; this number is
more important than the “button” majority,” the head of Dashnaktsutyun
Armen Rustamyan believes.

“The authorities will yield only if people come to the streets. Our
goal is to provide all-national mobilization on Freedom Square,”
the head of the ANC Levon Zurabyan said.

The opposition plans to hold a three-day meeting on Freedom Square
on April 28-30. President will conduct political consultations in
the nearest future, after that a new prime minister will be elected.

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/analysis/politics/53546.html

What The Former Soviet States Are Thinking About Russia

WHAT THE FORMER SOVIET STATES ARE THINKING ABOUT RUSSIA

National Journal
April 4 2014

In the west, all is not good in the neighborhood. In the east, it’s
a different story.

By Marina Koren April 4, 2014

With no evidence that Russia has any plans to withdraw its troops
from the border of Ukraine, some former Soviet states are worried
about their own regional security. Farther east, other countries,
closely aligned with Moscow rather than the West, say they are trying
to ease tensions. And several central Asian states have responded by
simply staying silent.

The United States and NATO announced this week that they are boosting
military support in the Baltic region, which is on especially high
alert. Moscow has long complained about Russians’ rights there, and
its takeover of Crimea suggests it may be willing to do something
about it. Russian President Vladimir Putin has said he has no plans
to go further than the recent annexation, but maintains his right to
defend ethnic Russians in foreign countries.

Here’s where the former Soviet republics stand on the Ukraine crisis.

Ukraine

Well, you know.

“I want to be perfectly clear. We will never recognize the annexation
of Crimea,” Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk told Reuters
on Friday. “The time will come when Ukraine will take over control
of Crimea.” Russia has hiked up the price of natural gas for Ukraine
by 80 percent, a move Yatseniuk called “totally unacceptable.”

Estonia

Last month, Russia “signaled concern” at Estonia’s treatment of
its large ethnic Russian minority. Russian officials took aim at
Estonia’s national language policy, which is similar to that of
Ukraine, where all children use Ukrainian in school. A quarter of
Estonia’s 1.3 million people are Russian speakers.

Some fear this could give Putin all he needs to intervene in the
country, but Russians there say they don’t need to be “rescued.”

Still, the Estonian government is wary. “Russia’s posture has no place
in the 21st century,” Foreign Minister Urmas Paet said last week. This
week, Estonian Prime Minister Taavi Roivas called for NATO to deploy
“boots on the ground” to the Baltics. Estonia regained its independence
when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, after more than 50 years of
Russian rule.

Latvia

“We are very much concerned about what is happening currently
in Ukraine, but we are not hysterical of course,” Latvian Foreign
Minister Edgars Rinkevics said recently. If the situation escalates,
his government would consider imposing sanctions against Russia. Until
then, a NATO presence is crucial in all Baltic states, he said.

This week, Latvia banned a Russian-language TV channel, citing
“war propaganda.”

Latvia, like the other Baltic states and much of Western Europe,
depends heavily on Russian exports of natural gas and crude oil.

Latvian President Andris Berzins has called for accelerating
construction on gas pipelines linking Poland, Lithuania, and
eventually Latvia. This week, Berzins asked the head of the Russian
Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, who is considered a Kremlin ally,
to postpone his planned May visit to Latvia, citing tensions between
Russia and Ukraine.

About 35 percent of Latvia’s population of 2 million are Russian
speakers. About 270,000 Latvians, most of whom came to the country
for work during the Soviet era, do not have citizenship. They feel
like they are “second-class citizens.” “This is Russia’s land,” one
resident recently told Reuters. Latvia was also taken over by the
Soviet Union in 1940 and did not regain its independence until 1991.

Lithuania

“The Russians occupied a part of Ukraine and they concentrated
their forces, and I think we should be ready to defend our states if
this aggression should continue,” Jouzas Olekas, Lithuania’s defense
minister, said this week. Regularly scheduled Russian military activity
over the Baltic airspace has put Lithuanian officials on edge.

Last month, Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite said Russia’s
annexation of Crimea is a direct threat to Lithuania’s regional
security. “We witnessed the use of brutal force to redraw the map of
Europe and to undermine the postwar political architecture established
in Europe,” she said.

The Soviet Union annexed Lithuania in 1940. Russians make up 6 percent
of Lithuania’s population.

Belarus

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, a close ally of Moscow,
said last month that Russia’s annexation of Crimea sets a “bad
precedent.” Ukraine, he said, should remain “a single, indivisible,
integral, nonbloc state.”

Belarus and Russia, however, are still talking. The two nations’
foreign ministers met on the sidelines of a Moscow meeting of the
Commonwealth of Independent States, an organization of former Soviet
republics, to discuss working together to diminish regional tensions.

Belarus also voted against a U.N. General Assembly resolution last
month declaring Crimea’s referendum invalid.

A Belarusian news agency on Thursday said Belarus-Russia cooperation
in the nuclear energy sector has “a bright future.”

Moldova

Moldovan Prime Minister Iurie Leanca has asked both Western leaders
and Russia “to prevent his country from falling apart.” But the
country has recently shown its Western leanings. On Thursday, Leanca
praised a decision by the European Union to lift visa restrictions on
Moldova, allowing its citizens to travel through the Schengen area,
a passport-free zone spanning 26 European countries. “I want to tell
the skeptics, who until recently have not believed that we will
travel freely to the European Union, that the prospect of joining
the European Union will be recognized in the same way,” he said.

Rumors are swirling that Russian special forces have already arrived
in Transnistria, a small Russian-occupied republic that broke away
from Moldova after a civil war in 1992. Transnistria, which no United
Nations members legally recognize, is well under Moscow’s influence.

Moldova’s closer ties to the E.U. have been met with threats from
Moscow’s representative to Transnistria.

Armenia

Armenia, unlike just about everyone else, recognized the results
of Crimea’s March referendum to become a part of Russia. Armenian
President Serzh Sargsyan told Putin that the vote was “yet another
example of the realization of peoples’ right to self-determination.”

Armenia recently announced plans to boost its yearly imports of
gas from neighboring Iran by 75 percent, and in exchange export
electricity to the Middle Eastern country. The move has been met
with relative silence from Russia, which controls Armenia’s entire
gas-pipeline system.

The non-reaction, Marianna Grigoryan explains at Eurasianet.org,
could be attributed to Putin’s desire to bring Armenia into a Eurasian
Economic Community union it created with Belarus and Kazakhstan in
2010. Members hope to expand the organization this year to other
former Soviet states, and furnish it as a counterweight to the
E.U. An E.U. commissioner said Friday that the union “undermines the
sovereignty of individual countries.”

Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, on the other hand, condemned the Crimea referendum, and
a statement from its embassy in Kiev said it “condemns extremism,
radicalism and separatism in its every manifestation and once again
confirms its adherence to the principles of sovereignty, independence
and support of the territorial integrity of Ukraine.”

But Azerbaijan has to tread carefully. Russia, along with the U.S. and
France, has played the role of mediator in Azerbaijan’s ongoing
battle with Armenia for Nagorno-Karabakh, a landlocked region in the
South Caucasus.

Georgia

Georgia broke diplomatic relations with Russia six years ago,
following the South Ossetia war, a brief armed conflict between the
two nations. Russia still occupies two breakaway provinces inside
Georgia, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, which Russia helped support in
their fight against Georgia in 2008.

NATO membership for Georgia is far off, but the alliance’s foreign
ministers met this week with their Georgian counterpart in Brussels
to talk about its possible eventual accession. In February, Georgian
Prime Minister Irakli Garibashivili advocated for a full seat at the
table. “This desire is supported by the overwhelming majority of the
Georgian population, as well as Georgia’s major political parties,”
he said. “The Georgian government will undertake every effort to
continue the path of reforms that will bring us closer to NATO.”

Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan, which borders Russia in the south, has the largest
population of ethnic Russians out of the former Soviet republics
in central Asia, at 22 percent of its population. Last month,
its president, Nursultan Nazarbayev, told Putin that he understood
Moscow’s stance on Crimea. But he said that Kazakhstan’s cooperation
with Russia on the recently formed union doesn’t mean Moscow would
exert more influence in the country.

“As far as our political independence is concerned, this is sacrosanct,
and Kazakhstan will not cede its sovereignty to anyone,” Nazarbayev
said.

Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan’s foreign ministry bashed ousted Ukrainian President Viktor
Yanukovych in a statement last month, which hinted at the country’s
past failed attempts at parliamentary democracy.

“The only source of power in any country is its people, and
a president who lost his people’s trust, who de facto lost his
presidential authority and, moreover, who fled the country, cannot
be legitimate,” the statement said. However, Kyrgyzstan, faced with
threats of retaliation from Moscow, abstained from voting last month
on a U.N. resolution that declared Crimea’s referendum illegal.

Kyrgyzstan maintains strong ties to Russia, which provides generous
aid packages to the cash-strapped nation, as well as arms and fuel,
and it hopes to join the Eurasian Economic Community. In other other
words, Kyrgyzstan is firmly in Russia’s grasp.

Tajikistan

Tajikistan also depends heavily on Russian aid. Like Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan did not vote in the U.N. resolution condemning Crimea’s
vote to join Russia. Russian and Tajik representatives continue to
cooperate on economic and trade issues, and have largely steered
clear of discussing the Ukraine crisis.

Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan broke its silence on escalating tensions in Ukraine in early
March but did not mention Russia. The events “pose a real threat to
the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,” a statement
from its foreign affairs ministry said, and ” elicit deep concern
in Uzbekistan.”

Uzbekistan’s leaders have cooperated with NATO on security issues
in the past, but the country leans heavily toward Russia, thanks to
strong economic ties. On Thursday, Moscow welcomed Uzbekistan into
the free-trade zone of the Commonwealth of Independent States, an
arrangement that will boost trade between Uzbekistan and its fellow
former Soviet republics. Uzbekistan has also asked Russian energy
firms to help tap its vast hydrocarbon deposits.

Turkmenistan

Turkmenistan, ruled by a Soviet-era holdover with zero tolerance for
dissent, depends on a Russian pipeline for exports, but it has recently
turned to Beijing for more business. The competition may spell future
trouble for Russia, but Turkmenistan has no plans to sever ties with
Moscow, let alone make comments about its involvement in Ukraine.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/what-the-former-soviet-states-are-thinking-about-russia-20140404