PACE Committee Condemns Use Of European Convention In Ramil Safarov’

PACE COMMITTEE CONDEMNS USE OF EUROPEAN CONVENTION IN RAMIL SAFAROV’S CASE

Thursday 29 May 2014 10:55

Yerevan /Mediamax/. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
Europe (PACE) Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights condemned
the use of Article 12 of the European Convention on the Transfer of
Sentenced Persons by Azerbaijan in the case of Ramil Safarov convicted
for murdering Armenian officer Gurgen Margaryan.

As PACE official website reports, PACE Committee described the use
of the European Convention by Azerbaijan to release Safarov “as a
violation of the principles of good faith in international relations
and of the rule of law”.

The Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons provides for the
transfer of foreign prisoners to their home countries. Its purpose
is primarily humanitarian, to improve prospects of rehabilitation
and reintegration of prison inmates into society.

The draft resolution notes with concern that the Convention was
invoked in order to justify the immediate release upon transfer to
Azerbaijan of Ramil Safarov.

“Upon his arrival in Azerbaijan, he was welcomed as a national hero”,
the draft resolution reads.

The text underlines that the Convention “is not designed to be used
for the immediate release of prisoners upon return to their own
country”. It underscores the importance of “applying the Convention
in good faith”.

The draft resolution should be presented for debate to the Assembly
later in 2014.

http://www.mediamax.am/en/news/foreignpolicy/10381/

Armenia’s President, Top-Ranking Officials Visit Memorial To Sardara

ARMENIA’S PRESIDENT, TOP-RANKING OFFICIALS VISIT MEMORIAL TO SARDARAPAT BATTLE HEROES – VIDEO

12:59 * 28.05.14

On the occasion of First Republic Day, Armenia’s high-ranking
officials, military commanders and ordinary citizens visited the
Memorial to the Sardarapat battle heroes.

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan talked to Armenia’s Minister of
Defense Seyran Ohanyan, Catholicos of the Great House of Cilicia
Aram I.

Armenia’s leader, accompanied by President of the Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic (NKR) Bako Sahakyan, Armenia’s Premier Hovik Abrahamyan and
President of Armenia’s Parliament Galust Sahakyan, laiod flowers at
the memorial.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/05/28/sardarapat-president/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxye2o5mtSo

Sharmazanov On Incident In Goris: The Criminal Must Be Punished Rega

SHARMAZANOV ON INCIDENT IN GORIS: THE CRIMINAL MUST BE PUNISHED REGARDLESS OF HIS PARTY AFFILIATION

by Ashot Safaryan

ARMINFO
Wednesday, May 28, 00:32

The criminal must undergo punishment no matter whose relative he is
and what party he belongs to, Eduard Sharmazanov, Vice Speaker of
Armenian Parliament, Spokesman for the ruling Republican Party of
Armenia (RPA), says when commenting on the recent incident in Goris.

“A criminal is a criminal no matter whether he is a member of the
Prosperous Armenia Party or the Republican Party of Armenia. Our
assessment, the RPA’s assessment is absolutely clear – there are law-
enforcement structures and the criminal must undergo punishment”,
says Sharmazanov.

To note, due to the measures taken by the Armenian law-enforces,
residents of Goris Gor Harutyunyan and Eyner Khachatryan appeared
before the Goris

Department of Armenian Police and gave explanations about the recent
bloody incident in Goris. The investigation is still going on. The
police are preparing the materials. The sons of Goris resident Gurgen
Harutyunyan (a.k.a. Kulak), Gor Harutyunyan and Artur Harutyunyan,
have already been found.

Eyner Khachatryan, the nephew of Syunik ex-governor Surik Khachatryan
(a.k.a. Liska), and his friends broke into the Harutyunyans’ flats in
Goris, severely beat two brothers Artur and Gor, inflicted numerous
knife wounds to them and took them to an undisclosed location.

Furthermore, Khachatryan’s nephew and his friends did not let
the ambulance help the wounded. According to some media reports,
following the incident, Syunik ex-governor Surik Khachatryan offered
USD 3 thousand to Artur and Gor’s mother for her silence.

More Russian Arms Deals With Azerbaijan Add Insult To Armenia’s Inju

EurAsiaNet.org
May 27 2014

More Russian Arms Deals With Azerbaijan Add Insult To Armenia’s Injury

May 27, 2014 – 9:37am, by Joshua Kucera

A Russian TOS-1A in a Baku military parade in 2013. (photo: Wikimedia Commons)

Just as Armenia was digesting the news that its ally, Russia, was
offering a large batch of top-of-the-line tanks to its foe,
Azerbaijan, it’s emerged that there are other such deals in the works,
as well.

APA reported that Russia will shortly deliver another batch of TOS-1A
“Solntsepyok”multiple-launch rocket systems to Azerbaijan. The deal to
buy those systems was announced last year, but at the time it was
reported that it would be for six; now the number has grown to 18.

In addition, Azerbaijan is reportedly in talks with Russia to buy
Bal-E coastal anti-ship missile systems. Russian newspaper Kommersant
quoted “an informed source in the Russian military-industrial complex”
as saying that “negotiations will start later, now there is an
understanding that our Azerbaijani colleagues are counting on the
purchase of one division of the system.”

Naturally Armenia, not having any navy, will not be threatened by the
anti-ship missiles. But the Solntsepyoks, on top of the earlier offer
of 100 T-90 tanks, is rankling in Yerevan. “I can’t be happy with that
but I have no right to stop it,” said Armenian Defense Minister Seyran
Ohanian, reported RFE/RL.

Expert opinion was divided on the impact of the deal. Some downplayed
the news: “The delivery of 100 tanks to Azerbaijan will not have any
significant impact on the military balance. But we’re concerned about
the fact that Azerbaijan keeps on purchasing attacking vehicles. Over
the past three years, Azerbaijan has increased its military purchases,
particularly the purchases of attacking vehicles for 400%. If this
tendency continues, then it might pose a threat for us,” said analyst
Hrachya Petrosyants in an interview with Armenian website Mediamax.

Others were more concerned, if not for the military balance than for
the state of the Armenia-Russia relationship. From RFE/RL:

“If that is not compensated with more arms supplies to Armenia it
could disrupt the balance,” warned Sergey Minasian, the deputy
director of the Caucasus Institute. He said Moscow has until now
cemented the Karabakh status quo with large-scale military assistance
to Yerevan.

Another analyst, Ruben Mehrabian, said Russia is not only
demonstrating that it is not a true Armenian ally but also
deliberately preventing a peaceful settlement by arming both parties
to the conflict. “It’s time to question Russia’s role as a mediator,”
he said.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/68407

Serzh Sargsyan invites Turkish President to visit Yerevan on April 2

Serzh Sargsyan invites Turkish President to visit Yerevan on April 24, 2015

17:48 27.05.2014

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan invites the Turkish President to
visit Armenia on April 24 to face the striking historic evidences of
the Armenian Genocide.

“The 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide is of great importance
for both world-spread Armenians and all humanity. Not only was April
24, 1915 the start of an unprecedented attempt to exterminate a whole
nation. The following events showed that it became the precedent for
other genocides in the 20th century,” Armenian President Serzh
Sargsyan said at the 4th sitting of the commission coordinating the
events dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

“Crimes against humanity cannot have a limitation period. The only
formula for prevention of genocides is the recognition and
condemnation of the hideous pages of history. As a nation that has
survived genocide, we have a special mission to prevent the recurrence
of such calamities in the future,” President Sargsyan said.

“On the threshold of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide we
once again call on all states and the international community to
recognize and condemn this unprecedented crime,” he said. “As a state
and as a nation we’ll continue our struggle for the recognition and
condemnation of the Armenian Genocide and the most terrible crimes
against humanity in different corners of the world,” President
Sargsyan said.

Speaking about Turkey’s decades-long policy of denying the fact of the
Armenian Genocide, the President said the only way for Turkey to get
rid of the heavy burden of the past is the recognition of the Armenian
Genocide. “It’s impossible to reach results with half-steps,” he
added.

President Sargsyan informed he has sent out invitations to the heads
of a number of countries to visit Armenia during 2015 and especially
on April 24 to pay tribute to the memory of the 1.5 million victims of
the Armenian Genocide and to see that “the Armenian people not only
overcame this heavy trial, but also managed to revive. “We not only
survived, but also managed to unite and pave the way towards statehood
and independent Armenia.”

“Official Ankara continues to speak about the creation of a commission
of historians and opening of the archives. First of all, it’s known
that the Armenian archives have always been open to all researchers
interested in the scientific aspect of the issue. The materials kept
in scientific institutions and museums have always been open to
public,” the President said, adding that “visiting any Armenian
family, entering any Armenian home is enough to face the truth of the
Armenian Genocide.”

“It will be enough to visit any Diaspora community and ask how their
ancestors have found themselves in that country. If the Turkish
authorities are interested in the truth, they should visit Armenia on
April 24. I don’t think they will continue to speak about the opening
of archives after that. I avail myself of the opportunity to
officially invite the Turkish President (whoever is elected during the
forthcoming elections) to visit Armenia on April 24, 2015 to face the
striking historic evidences of the Armenian Genocide.”

“With all this we never spread hatred towards the Turkish people.
Moreover, we are trying to create conditions for Armenian and Turkish
people to communicate with each other to find ways of reconciliation.
This was the objective behind our initiative to normalize the
Armenian-Turkish relations and open the shared border,” the President
said. “Turkey is well aware of the ways of normalizing the relations
with Armenia, if it’s really sincere in its wish,” he added.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2014/05/27/serzh-sargsyan-invites-turkish-president-to-visit-yerevan-on-april-24-2015/

4 non-coalition parties to form common agenda

4 non-coalition parties to form common agenda

May 27, 2014 | 15:32

YEREVAN. – The four non-coalition parliamentary forces will form a
common agenda comprised of around 10 key problems, secretary of
Prosperous Armenia group Naira Zohrabyan told reporters.

“We will finalize our demands during the next week’s meeting and will
move in this direction,” she said after the meeting on Tuesday.

Naira Zohrabyan said she is not authorized to name the problems, but
assured the media is well aware of them.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Serzh Sargsyan invited to Supreme Eurasian Economic Council’s meetin

Haykakan Zhamanak: Serzh Sargsyan invited to Supreme Eurasian Economic
Council’s meeting

11:20 27/05/2014 >> DAILY PRESS

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan has received an invitation to attend
a meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council on May 29, Haykakan
Zhamanak writes. However, there is no information about whether or not
he will participate, head of the Department of Integration of Eurasian
Economic Commission Viktor Spasky told Haykakan Zhamanak on Monday,
adding that he is not well informed of the organizational issues
concerning the meeting.

“I am informed that there has been an invitation, but I do not know
who will participate and in what format,” he said in response to the
question of whether Serzh Sargsyan will participate in the meeting.

Source: Panorama.am

Those Nights In Nairobi

Outlook
May 24 2014

Those Nights In Nairobi

>From early seafarers to a globalised people, overseas Gujaratis are
etched as a distinct type

by Pranay Sharma

Seafaring Gujaratis are known to have engaged with the outside world
for centuries. Gujaratis have had trade links with the ancient Romans,
Persians, Chinese and Egyptians. It may have been a Kutchi sailor, by
the name of Kanji Malam, who escorted Vasco da Gama from the Kenyan
coast to India. So, as the era of colonialism began, a Gujarati was
best qualified to be there at the inauguration. This zeal for outbound
trade has taken them, in recent times, to far ends of the world. Even
so, it might make eyes pop, in India and beyond, when we are told that
rock star Freddie Mercury, actor Ben Kingsley, conductor Zubin Mehta,
Pakistani wri-ter Bapsi Sidhwa, the statuesque Persis Khambatta and
acid-jazz singer Asha Puthli are Gujaratis or have some links with
Gujarat. An impressive diasporic roster, yes–but you do not expect it,
even in a jocular aside, to be stretched up to the doorstep of the
British royal family. If reports from June 2013 are to be believed,
Prince William and his brother, Andrew, have links to Gujarat.

Here’s the back story. Trace William’s matriliny, via Lady Di, all the
way to seven generations back, and you reach Eliza Kewark. Of
Armenian-Indian origin, Eliza was the hou-sekeeper of Theo-dore
Forbes, a Scottish merchant who worked for the East India Company in
Surat. Thus, dna research has offered reason for Diana and her sons to
be smuggled into the bulging pantheon of Non-Resident Gujaratis
(NRGS)!

Not that this roster needs any burnishing. The larger story of the
high-achieving Gujarati diaspora is one that reaches deep into
historical time, with unknown sailors making off from the
manufacturing and trading hubs in Gujarat from the days of the Indus
Valley Civilisation, and this involved cultural goods like printed
textiles, a connection that endures.

No wonder Gujaratis have had no qua-lms in crossing the ‘kaala paani’,
traditionally proscribed for savarna Indians, and it shows in the
lives of many of them. Gandhi’s two decades in South Africa are rather
well known. Dhirubhai Amb-ani, founder of Reliance Industries, spent
part of his formative years in Aden, including as an attendant in a
gas-filling station. And Freddie Merc-ury was born in Zanzibar–a
factor of the Gujarati settlements in British-held parts of Africa
since the 19th century, being everything from ordinary shopkeepers to
trading in gems and spices.

The story of the Gujarati diaspora, in this sense, differs largely
from the migratory patterns of other Indian communities. Indian-origin
people to be found in the old colonial holdings, especially from
eastern UP, Bihar, the Chhottanagpur plateau and parts of south India,
were largely taken as indentured labour. Gujaratis, on the contrary,
launched themselves into the outside world voluntarily, in the quest
for commerce and expansion of mercantile links. “Gujaratis have long
been part of the Indian Ocean trade networks and have looked at the
global economy as an opportunity rather than a threat, quite unlike
their counterparts in the east,” says Devesh Kapur of the University
of Pennsylvania.

True, with a 1,600-km long coastline, it’s also natural that these
links with the outside world through trade were fostered by local hubs
of great importance on the medieval Indian map. The Gulf of Cambay,
bang in the centre of flourishing, old sea trade routes that stretched
from China at one end and linked up with Persia, Aden and the
Euro-pean civilisations via the Red Sea in the ancient days, allowed
the port cities of Lothal, Bharuch, Cambay and Surat to develop over
two millennia. A deep Gujarati engagement with West Asia, East and
South Africa, and South-east Asia on the other side, and openness to a
certain multiculturalism, was a concomitant development.

But are there special traits Gujaratis have that distinguish them from
others in the Indian diaspora? “The very strong family ties and deep
cultural roots that helped build trust and networks distinguish
Gujaratis and have in turn been critical for their entrepreneurial
success,” says Kapur. As a leading expert on the Indian diaspora and
author of Diaspora, Development and Democracy, he poi-nts out that the
provision of access to cre-dit within the network rather than having
to seek recourse to the formal banking system also allowed Guj-a-ratis
to succeed and sustain business expansion even during times of crises.
Other commentators have noted that the community’s global renown in
business matters was such that a bill of credit issued by a Gujarati
merchant would be honoured as far as 5,000 miles away.

However, there was a marked acceleration in migration from the late
19th century, when Gujaratis began to go to East and South Africa and
parts of the Gulf. The destination seemed to change towards the West
after World War II and Independence. From the 1960s on, large number
of Indians, including many Gujaratis, went to the UK and the US. It
included droves of Gujaratis from East Africa, particularly from
Uganda when dictator Idi Amin expelled Indians who controlled the
country’s commerce.

Experts feel the expulsion from Uganda had an impact on Gujaratis,
especially those who went to the UK and later to the US (the Indian
government was reluctant to take them back). As they bounced back
through sheer resilience and talent, the West allowed Gujaratis to
break away from many of their typical professions. Thus, the
‘dukawalas’ or shopkeepers in Africa and UK and, later, the
Motel-Patels in the US, tried their hand in other businesses and
professions. Now, non-resident Gujaratis are one of the most affluent
and influential sections among nris, and many from these sections were
actively invo-lved as a strong diasporic element providing momentum
(and funds) to the Modi campaign.

“There was a lot of Gandhian idealism in my grandmother’s generation.
Then my mother’s generation turned more consumerist. Then came
globalisation in our time. It is the most globalised community in
India now,” says Vibhuti Patel of Mumbai’s SNDT University. Truly, in
a globalised world, the image of the stereotyped Gujarati is
challenged by those in politics, arts and entertainment, medicine,
information technology etc.

This section constitutes among the str-ongest Indian lobbies in the
US. Their aggressive lobbying dur-ing the 1999 Kar-gil war forced the
US to pressurise Pak-istan to vacate Indian territory. The irony is
that, after the 2002 riots, the Gujarati diaspora lobbied with their
gov-ernments to deny Modi a visa. Later, a key section supported him
in a bid to end his interna-tional isolation and did their bit to
reach out to Japan, Singapore, China and Rus-sia, ped-dling the
‘Gujarat model’ as a viable plan to engage with investors.

Many in the Gujarati diaspora will now naturally ramp up their voluble
support for Modi and bask in the glory of Gujarati pride, but we
should not be surprised if some of them continue to be against his
visit to the US. For in 2014, overseas Gujaratis are a disparate lot.

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?290794

Loans from int’l organizations hardly serve the purpose – Vahagn Kha

Loans from international organizations hardly serve the purpose –
Vahagn Khachatryan

15:29 * 25.05.14

Loans borrowed from international organizations do not often serve the
purpose, economist Vahagn Khachatryan told Tert.am as he commented on
the signing of a $50 loan agreement between Armenia’s Ministry of
Finance and the World Bank.

Cooperating with international donors gives rise to a problem of how
well Armenia’s economy is capable of utilizing the loans and whether
resolving such problems is part of Armenia’s economic strategy.

“Loans are often borrowed because the World Bank grants them and our
government takes them out. And then we see they are hardly effective.
A glaring example is the loans taken out for corruption control and
raising efficiency of tax collection. But their effectiveness is
highly dubious,” Khachatryan said.

If problems could be resolved by means of loans, the WB loans could
only be welcomed especially since they are granted on favorable terms.

“The fact is that the aforementioned areas need additional funding.
But are loans the best means of resolving the problems? Is there not
an alternative, such as fundraising or more efficient use of available
funds?”

“Or the notorious Russian loan was never utilized. Funds were provided
to serve the loan, but were later returned to Russia. Actually, it was
only done for us to pay interests rather than to invest the funds in
Armenia’s economy. All this should be considered as a whole to
understand if Armenia has borrowed one more loan from the World Bank,”
Khachatryan said.

Asked about public control mechanisms, the economist said:

“The first mechanism is the National Assembly, the second is
transparency of processes. But in Armenia this all is only
declarations.

The public is the last to know about anything now because their
activities are not transparent. The National Assembly cannot even know
because the government provides as much information as it considers
necessary. And we learn about it too late,” Khachatryan said.

The following conclusion can be drawn from this: regularly borrowed
loans serve purposes different than officially declared.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Major Action Was Thwarted In Karabakh

Major Action Was Thwarted In Karabakh

Naira Hayrumyan, Political Commentator
Comments – Saturday, 24 May 2014, 23:41

Judging by hints of politicians and diplomats, a big action was
planned in Karabakh which was prevented by publishing the principles
of settlement that were initially unacceptable for the Armenians. The
American co-chair published them, and the result was the rejection of
the “principles of Madrid”.

One can judge the planned action by several statements. For instance,
the president of Iran Hassan Rowhani announced in Pekin that the
Russian-Iranian cooperation over the past few months has allowed
cutting threat of armed conflicts in the region.

Russia intended to deploy troops in Karabakh on the borders which will
be verified with Baku, return some territories to Azerbaijan, station
the troops on the border with Iran, unite the rest of Karabakh with
Armenia into the Customs Union or annex it altogether.

The recent statement by the NKR minister of defense Movses Hakobyan
indicates that such an action had been planned. “This year, for the
first time over the past five years, Azerbaijan has urged Russia to
mediate for maintaining the ceasefire. We have given our consent but
the enemy broke its word,” Movses Hakobyan said.

He said this year the Karabakhi side advanced 6-7 km in the region of
Haterk and occupied useful heights. And for the first time over these
years this year Azerbaijan failed to advance its positions.

Has Iran really succeeded preventing stationing of Russian
“peacekeepers”? Tehran has announced that change of borders is
unacceptable, and presence of foreign troops in the region cannot be
allowed. Iran’s statement may have made Russia and Azerbaijan to give
up their plans. And Azerbaijan blames the United States for thwarting
those plans.

The United States does not hide its reluctance for appearance of
Russian troops in the region. The U.S. ambassador to Azerbaijan
Richard Morningstar has recently opened the brackets.

“I think perhaps what’s changed is the calculation as to risk, as to
future interference with Azerbaijan. I’m not sure Azerbaijan has seen
it yet. It could see it in the future. I think the Putin trip to
Azerbaijan last summer was very interesting.”

“Obviously, I’m not in Putin’s mind. I was not part of those meetings.
Do you think that either Iran or Russia would like to have common
borders right now?

Russia and Iran may have “common borders” only in case the Russian
troops appear in Karabakh’s territories bordering with Iran.

Notably, Warlick’s points were approved by Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan’s
foreign minister Mammedyarov said Baku does not mind the presence of
peacekeepers in the conflict area. “Peacekeepers are necessary because
there is no confidence between the sides but it is necessary to ensure
people’s security, including of Azerbaijani resettlers.”

The entry of Russian forces to Karabakh may eventually put a full stop
to the prospect of opening the region and turn Armenia to an outcast.
For the time being, however, Iran and Europe are talking about layout
of infrastructures via Armenia and bringing the region under the
responsibility of the Euro-Atlantic community. In fact, by thwarting
the Russian-Azerbaijani deal on division of Karabakh (with Armenia’s
connivance), Iran and the West saved both Armenian states and reserved
their chance to integrate with the global system.

Maciej Bohosiewicz, the Chairman of the Polish-Armenian Chamber of
Commerce, has recently urged Armenia to become a bridge between Europe
and Iran. Armenia has not responded yet. However, when the terrible
action was being plotted, two important things took place. One was a
march against Putin was help in Yerevan, and, second, young people of
Karabakh rejected the principles of Madrid. Besides, the prospect of
membership of Armenia to the European Union is vague.

– See more at:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/32475#sthash.sJaXsgcO.dpuf