Armenia’s government at odds with its human rights ombudsman

EurasiaNet.org
Oct 25 2021
Karine Ghazaryan Oct 25, 2021
Armenia’s human rights ombudsman, Arman Tatoyan, gives a presentation on the border situation. (photo: ombuds.am)

On October 18, Armenia’s outspoken human rights ombudsman Arman Tatoyan announced that Azerbaijani forces were fortifying their presence in a small bit of Gegharkunik province where they reportedly have been stationed for several months.

“They continue building new roads, increasing the number of servicemen and armaments at the posts,” Tatoyan wrote on his Facebook page. “Active engineering work is being carried out to reinforce their positions.”

The announcement prompted an unusual rebuttal from Armenia’s ministry of defense, which issued a statement calling Tatoyan’s claims “obviously exaggerated” and “detached from reality.” Tatoyan shot back in another Facebook post, accusing the MoD of feeding into an Azerbaijani disinformation campaign by impugning his claims.

The confrontation represented a new spark in a long-running tension between the government and the office of the ombudsman, who has taken a highly visible role calling public attention to the fragile security situation along the Azerbaijani border following last year’s war.

Tatoyan was appointed to the post of ombudsman in 2016, two years before the “Velvet Revolution” that brought the current government, led by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, to power.

Initially, Tatoyan took a low profile under the new government. But starting after last year’s defeat in the war with Azerbaijan, he has become far more outspoken. That has led to criticism that he has remained loyal to the former regime, which since last year’s war has also heavily attacked the current authorities on security issues.

Tatoyan has stayed quiet about his own political sympathies, though his take on human rights often dovetails with that of the opposition. In 2019, when the country was debating whether to ratify the anti-domestic violence Istanbul Convention, he remained on the sidelines as opposition figures assailed the government on the topic. Human rights organizations also have criticized Tatoyan for failing to properly condemn violations of LGBTQ rights.

He is regularly praised by opposition figures while sparring with government officials and ruling party members of parliament.

In one session of parliament in May, when Tatoyan presented his annual report on the work of the ombudsman’s office, Maria Karapetyan, a member from the ruling Civil Contract party, criticized the ombudsman, reminding him that he is “not a politician” and that the “aggressive tone and content” of his speech were “not appropriate for the institution that he represents.” Tatoyan responded by complaining that ruling party members “overtly falsify facts” about his work.

Tatoyan also criticized the state-run public television for becoming a “government propagandist” because, Tatoyan claimed, the channel’s news programs did not cover his statements about the situation on borders in Syunik province. In response, the leading Public TV host invited Tatoyan for an interview and accused him of taking a political position. 

In March, the government proposed a bill that would reduce funding to the office of the ombudsman. Government officials denied that there was any political motive behind the bill, but some human right defenders criticized the decision as an infringement on the ombudsman’s independence.

While Tatoyan had failed in the past to act on other critical issues for human rights in Armenia, he deserved credit for his work after the war, said Nina Karapetyants, the head of Armenia’s Helsinki Association. And the government’s bill would have set a dangerous precedent for the political independence of future ombudsmen, too, she added. The government eventually withdrew the bill.

This round of conflict has dragged on, as well, with the defense ministry and Tatoyan continuing to issue mutual accusations.

And the spat has drawn in other officials. The Secretary of Armenia’s Security Council, Armen Grigoryan, accused Tatoyan of supporting the political opposition, noting in an interview with news site Rusarminfo that the ombudsman only had a few months left in his term and suggesting that when that happened Tatoyan would openly enter politics. (Tatoyan’s term ends in February 2022.)

Meanwhile, the opposition again stepped up to defend him. “While we hear from Europe that the Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan is a ‘Status A,’ high-class official with exceptional public trust — which for us doesn’t even need proof — the Secretary of the Security Council is hurrying to call him a ‘counter-revolutionary’ and biased,” wrote Lilit Galstian, an opposition member of parliament, on her Facebook page. 

 

Karine Ghazaryan is a freelance journalist covering Armenia.

  

Armenian Prime Minister receives Iranian Prosecutor General

Save

Share

 16:03, 13 October, 2021

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 13, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan received Prosecutor General of Iran Mohammad Jafar Montazeri, the PM’s Office said in a statement.

Pashinyan welcomed the Iranian Prosecutor General’s visit to Armenia and stated that the government attaches great importance to the relations and cooperation with Iran, including in the law enforcement field.

“I am happy to record that there is quite an effective cooperation between our offices of prosecutor general. Of course, Armenia is ready to develop and deepen the cooperation in the justice field, and your visit is a good opportunity in this direction. During the meetings with the Iranian President we agreed that all our agencies should establish close cooperation”, the Armenian PM said.

In turn Mohammad Jafar Montazeri said his visit to Armenia is taking place in response to the visit of the Armenian Prosecutor General to Iran.

“Of course, due to coronavirus this visit was delayed a little bit. Before my visit to Armenia, I met with President of Iran Mr. Raisi two-three days ago. He asked to convey his warm greetings to you, praised you and stated that your recent meeting was very good and productive”.

The Prosecutor General said that Iran highlights the development and expansion of the cooperation with Armenia in all areas. He said that the centuries-old friendly relations between the two countries are a good base to resist all the challenges existing in the region and find necessary solutions with the exercise of the existing big potential. “We are interested in developing the relations with Armenia for the benefit of our countries”, Mohammad Jafar Montazeri said.

Mr. Montazeri said that Iran, in its relations with neighbors, is guided by friendly policy, however, adding that they will never allow deployment of terrorists and forces provoking war along the country’s borders.

PM Pashinyan added that he has great impressions from the meetings with the Iranian President and stated that his statement according to which the new governments of Armenia and Iran have started their activity at the same time is viewed as a message to open a new page in the bilateral relations.

In terms of resisting the current challenges, Pashinyan highlighted boosting also the Armenian-Iranian economic cooperation, in particular extending the gas for electricity agreement, complete the construction of the 3rd high-voltage power transmission line, completely utilize the potential of the Meghri free economic zone, etc.

The sides also discussed the regional developments.

Pashinyan also asked to convey his warm greetings to Iran’s Supreme Leader and President.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Local self-government elections to be held in Armenia

Foreign Brief
Oct 17 2021
  • In Daily Brief
  • Alex Avaneszadeh

Photo: OSCE Parliamentary Assembly

The first municipal elections organized under a new local voting format will be held today in Armenia.

Before June 2020, Armenia’s multi-day local elections resulted in the direct appointment of city mayors. In contrast, today’s elections will see voters elect individual candidates, who will then form the city councils that will choose new mayors.

The electoral threshold has also been reduced to 4% for political parties and 6% for coalitions, from 6% and 8%, respectively. Since today’s elections were originally scheduled to take place at an earlier date, two more election days are scheduled for November 14 and December 5.

In the medium- to long-term, expect the change in the electoral threshold to boost party and national minority pluralities. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, however, has been appointing acting mayors—who are also running in the election—as the current municipal election dates surpass the five-year term limits of incumbent mayors. As such, expect the acting mayors to have access to greater administrative resources than their opponents. With Pashinyan maintaining popularity in rural areas, expect the acting Pashinyan-appointed mayors to receive much of the rural vote, thus consolidating the administration’s political influence at various municipalities across the country.

Armenian finance minister introduces government’s five-year action plan to German partners

Save

Share

 16:47, 13 October, 2021

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 13, ARMENPRESS. Finance Minister of Armenia Tigran Khachatryan had a working meeting with the representatives of Berlin Economics independent consulting company and the German Economic Union NGO, the ministry said in a statement.

Minister Khachatryan introduced the guests on the government’s five-year action plan and talked about the manageability of the current foreign debt and the macroeconomic features.

The guests expressed readiness to cooperate around issues of mutual interest and stated that the German partners closely follow the activity of the Armenian government and welcome the ongoing reforms.

The sides agreed to continue the dialogue over the issue on the agenda and expressed their support to the development of the Armenian-German bilateral economic ties.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Armenian companies will get cheaper loans as a result of S&P Global rating – Pashinyan

Save

Share

 12:02, 14 October, 2021

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 14, ARMENPRESS. The assigning of a rating by the S&P Global Ratings to Armenia for the first time has a strategic meaning, Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan said today at the Cabinet meeting.

According to him, this development contributes to the internal formation of both the domestic and the foreign capital market. “This is very important for us”, he said.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said that over the past years the government has issued Eurobonds twice, and in both cases a historical minimum of rates has been registered. “International investors trusted the capacity of Armenia, and they turned to be right in fact. It’s necessary to work with the private sector very intensively, so that the companies will go to the capital market. This will raise the affordability of loans, because if there is an alternative in the market, the banks will have to run a more flexible interest rate policy, which can inject a new blood in our economy”, the PM said.

Minister of Economy Vahan Kerobyan added that the rating helps to activate the processes in the domestic market. “Even the Central Bank for some reserve normatives has privileges for those companies who have a rating”, he said.

In turn the Central Bank President Martin Galstyan said this rating reduces the spending of private companies. “I think in this sense the government has taken the necessary step, maybe we need to urge the private companies to be open, transparent and accountable in order to be able to attract funds and carry out their activities”, he said.

PM Pashinyan added that the government must work with those potential companies which can be rated. “We should put a task before us that in 2022-2023 we will do everything for the appearance of such companies”, the PM added.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Turkish press: Turkey’s heritages enjoy UNESCO stamp

Handan Kazancı   |15.10.2021


ISTANBUL

With the addition of the Arslantepe Mound earlier this year, Turkey currently boasts 19 sites on the UNESCO World Heritage List, including 17 cultural and two mixed.

As of 2021, UNESCO lists 1,154 cultural and natural sites worldwide on its World Heritage List.

Selimiye Mosque and social complex in Edirne

Added to the UNESCO list in 2011, the Selimiye Mosque and its social complex in Turkey’s northwestern province of Edirne was constructed by Sinan, the most renowned Ottoman architect in the 16th century.

Its complex includes madrasas (Islamic schools), a covered market, a clock house, an outer courtyard, and a library.

“The square Mosque with its single great dome and four slender minarets, dominates the skyline of the former Ottoman capital of Edirne,” according to UNESCO’s website.

Adorned by tiles from the town of Iznik renowned for its ceramics at “the peak period of their production,” the organization says the mosque “testifies to an art form that remains unsurpassed in this material.”

Pergamon and multi-layered cultural landscape

Located in Turkey’s Aegean province of Izmir, Pergamon and its surrounding multi-layered cultural landscape was added to the list in 2014.

As the capital of the Hellenistic Attalid dynasty, the acropolis of Pergamon was a major center of learning in the ancient world, says UNESCO.

“Monumental temples, theatres, stoa or porticoes, gymnasium, altar, and library were set into the sloping terrain surrounded by an extensive city wall,” it adds.

It is possible to see the remains of the Roman, Byzantine, and Ottoman empires in and around the modern town of Bergama.

Ephesus

Also in Izmir province, the world-renowned ancient city of Ephesus was added to the UNESCO list in 2015.

The UN body celebrates “grand monuments of the Roman Imperial period” including the Library of Celsus and the Great Theater, which have been unearthed in excavations.

“Little remains of the famous Temple of Artemis, one of the ‘Seven Wonders of the World,’ which drew pilgrims from all around the Mediterranean.” The House of the Virgin Mary, a chapel close to Ephesus has also become a place of Christian pilgrimage, it says.

Historic areas of Istanbul

Turkey’s largest city Istanbul has been associated with major political, religious, and artistic events for more than 2,000 years, the UN has said.

“Its masterpieces include the ancient Hippodrome of Constantine, the 6th-century Hagia Sophia and the 16th-century Suleymaniye Mosque.”

However, it has warned that all these sites are now “under threat from population pressure, industrial pollution, and uncontrolled urbanization.”

Istanbul was added to the list in 1985.

Bursa and Cumalikizik

In northwestern Turkey, the city of Bursa and nearby village of Cumalikizik were added to the UNESCO list in 2014 as a serial nomination of eight component sites.

“The site illustrates the creation of an urban and rural system establishing the Ottoman Empire in the early 14th century,” it says, adding that the area “embodies the key functions of the social and economic organization” of the Ottomans’ first capital, which “evolved around a civic centre.”

The village of Cumalikizik is the only rural area “to show the provision of hinterland support for the capital.”

City of Safranbolu

Added to the UNESCO list in 1994, the City of Safranbolu, a typical Ottoman town, is located in northern Turkey.

From the 13th century to the advent of the railway in the early 20th century, Safranbolu was “an important caravan station on the main East-West trade route,” UNESCO says.

It features an Old Mosque, Old Bath and the Suleyman Pasha Medrese, which were built in 1322. “During its apogee in the 17th century, Safranbolu’s architecture influenced urban development throughout much of the Ottoman Empire.”

Hattusha

Hattusha, the capital of the Hittites — one of the most ancient Anatolian civilizations — was added to the UNESCO list in 1986.

The city’s remains, located in present-day central Turkey, is “notable for its urban organization, the types of construction that have been preserved,” including temples, royal residences, fortifications.

UNESCO also notes the rich ornamentation of the Lions’ Gate and the Royal Gate into the city’s interior, as well as the “ensemble of rock art at Yazilikaya.”

“The city enjoyed considerable influence in Anatolia and northern Syria in the 2nd millennium BC,” it adds.

Great mosque and hospital of Divrigi

The distinguished 11th-century Great Mosque and Hospital of Divrigi are located in central Turkey. It was added to the UNESCO list in 1985.

With its single prayer room and two cupolas, the mosque exhibits a “highly sophisticated technique of vault construction, and a creative, exuberant type of decorative sculpture — particularly on the three doorways, in contrast to the unadorned walls of the interior,” it describes the “unique features of this masterpiece of Islamic architecture.”

Arslantepe Mound

Located in eastern Turkey, the 7,000-year-old ancient mound of Arslantepe was added to the UNESCO list just earlier this year.

The site was occupied from at least the sixth millennium BC until the late Roman period, says UNESCO, citing archeological evidence.

“The earliest layers of the Early Uruk period are characterized by adobe houses from the first half of the 4th millennium BCE.”

“The site illustrates the processes which led to the emergence of a State society in the Near East and a sophisticated bureaucratic system that predates writing … Exceptional metal objects and weapons have been excavated at the site, among them the earliest swords so far known in the world, which suggests the beginning of forms of organized combat as the prerogative of an elite, who exhibited them as instruments of their new political power.”

Diyarbakir fortress and Hevsel Gardens cultural landscape

The Diyarbakir Fortress, Hevsel Gardens, and its surrounding cultural landscape in Eastern Turkey were added by UNESCO in 2015 as a single listing.

The area “has been an important center since the Hellenistic period, through the Roman, Sassanid, Byzantine, Islamic, and Ottoman times to the present, the UN agency explains.

“The site encompasses the Inner castle, known as Ickale and including the Amida Mound, and the 5.8 km-long (3.6 miles) city walls of Diyarbakir with their numerous towers, gates, buttresses, and 63 inscriptions.”

Archaeological site of Troy

The legendary ancient city of Troy is located in the western province of Canakkale and was added to the list in 1998. “Troy, with its 4,000 years of history, is one of the most famous archaeological sites in the world,” according to UNESCO.

“In scientific terms, its extensive remains are the most significant demonstration of the first contact between the civilizations of Anatolia and the Mediterranean world.”

“The siege of Troy by Spartan and Achaean warriors from Greece in the 13th or 12th century BC, immortalized by Homer in the Iliad, has inspired great creative artists throughout the world ever since.”

Aphrodisias

Added by UNESCO in 2017, the archaeological site of Aphrodisias in present-day southwestern Turkey comprises of a temple to the Greek goddess Aphrodite that dates from the third century BC, along with a city constructed a century later.

“The wealth of Aphrodisias came from the marble quarries and the art produced by its sculptors,” adds UNESCO. “The city streets are arranged around several large civic structures, which include temples, a theatre, an agora, and two bath complexes.”

Hierapolis-Pamukkale

Pamukkale, a natural landmark known for its mineral-rich thermal waters and white travertine terraces, has long been a major tourist attraction in southwestern Turkey and was added to the list in 1988.

It is “an unreal landscape, made up of mineral forests, petrified waterfalls and a series of terraced basins,” according to UNESCO.

The adjacent site of Hierapolis was established at the end of the second century BC by the Attalid kingdom as a thermal spa. “The ruins of the baths, temples, and other Greek monuments can be seen at the site.”

Xanthos-Letoon

The ancient city of Xanthos-Letoon was added to the UNESCO list in 1988.

Serving as the capital of the ancient Lycian kingdom in current-day southwestern Turkey, it “illustrates the blending of Lycian traditions and Hellenic influence, especially in its funerary art,” the UN agency underlines.

“The epigraphic inscriptions are crucial for our understanding of the history of the Lycian people and their Indo-European language.”

Neolithic site of Catalhoyuk

Dating back 9,000 years, prehistoric Catalhoyuk is located in what is today central Turkey and was added to the list in 2012.

The site testifies “to the evolution of the social organization and cultural practices as humans adapted to a sedentary life,” according to UNESCO.

“The western mound shows the evolution of cultural practices in the Chalcolithic period, from 6200 BC to 5200 BC. Catalhoyuk provides important evidence of the transition from settled villages to urban agglomeration, which was maintained in the same location for over 2,000 years … It features a unique streetless settlement of houses clustered back to back with roof access into the buildings.”

Goreme National Park and rock sites of Cappadocia

UNESCO describes Cappadocia as “a spectacular landscape,” adding the site to its list in 1985.

The site is “entirely sculpted by erosion,” it says, adding that the Goreme valley and its surroundings contain “rock-hewn sanctuaries that provide unique evidence of Byzantine art in the post-Iconoclastic period.”

Gobeklitepe

The famed ancient site of Gobeklitepe is located in Turkey’s southeastern Sanliurfa province and was added to UNESCO’s list in 2018.

It “presents monumental round-oval and rectangular megalithic structures erected by hunter-gatherers in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic age” between 9,600 and 8,200 BC, according to UNESCO. “These monuments were probably used in connection with rituals, most likely of a funerary nature.”

“Distinctive T-shaped pillars are carved with images of wild animals, providing insight into the way of life and beliefs of people living in Upper Mesopotamia about 11,500 years ago.”

Mt. Nemrut

Located in the Kahta District of the Adiyaman province, Mt. Nemrut, towers 2,134-meters (7,001 feet) high and has been a UNESCO World Heritage site since 1987.

“The mausoleum of Antiochus I (69–34 BC), who reigned over Commagene, a kingdom founded north of Syria and the Euphrates after the breakup of Alexander’s empire, is one of the most ambitious constructions of the Hellenistic period,” says the UN agency.

“The syncretism of its pantheon, and the lineage of its kings, which can be traced back through two sets of legends, Greek and Persian, is evidence of the dual origin of this kingdom’s culture.”

Archaeological site of Ani

Ani, a medieval Armenian city that is often called “the City of 1,001 Churches,” is situated in the eastern Kars province on the Armenian border. The site was added to the UNESCO list in 2016.

The site “combines residential, religious and military structures, characteristic of a medieval urbanism built up over the centuries by Christian and then Muslim dynasties,” UNESCO says. “The city flourished in the 10th and 11th centuries CE when it became the capital of the medieval Armenian kingdom of the Bagratides and profited from control of one branch of the Silk Road.”

“The Mongol invasion and a devastating earthquake in 1319 marked the beginning of the city’s decline … The site presents a comprehensive overview of the evolution of medieval architecture through examples of almost all the different architectural innovations of the region between the 7th and 13th centuries CE.”

Armenia vows not to allow any change in borders

Iran Front Page
Oct 13 2021

Armenia’s National Security Council Secretary Armen Grigoryan has stressed that Yerevan will not allow any change in regional borders.

“The Armenian armed forces are ready to defend the country’s territorial integrity and security. Armenia will not allow border changes in the region; in this case we can clearly say that there is an international consensus on this.” Grigoryan stated in an exclusive interview with Iran’s Tasnim News Agency in Yerevan.

He categorically rejected the idea of creating new corridors in the southern parts of the Caucasus after the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict which resulted in the liberation of the Republic of Azerbaijan’s territory from Armenian occupation.

“I want to emphasize that Armenia has never proposed, and will not propose anything about this corridor, and it has never held and will not hold negotiations about the corridor,” Grigoryan noted.

The concept of a new corridor called Zangezur between Nakhchivan and the Republic of Azerbaijan has become a hot topic in southern Caucasus these days. But Armenian officials have repeatedly stated that they have not discussed the issue with other parties.

“I would like to make it clear once again that the government of the Republic of Armenia has never negotiated on the territory and sovereignty of Armenia. We have not and will not have any negotiations on the right of sovereignty and territory belonging to Armenia,” the Armenian National Security Council secretary stressed.

Grigoryan said Azeri President Ilham Aliyev’s statements about a new road in southern Armenia are outside the scope of the negotiations, which will never help the development of the talks and will not have a positive effect.

The Azeri president has in the past threatened to use force to establish a corridor through southern Armenia to connect his country with the Autonomous Nakhchivan Republic.

The top Armenian security official stressed that based on previous agreements, the Republic of Azerbaijan can use Armenian territory to connect to Nakhchivan, and Armenia can use Azeri roads and railways to reach central Asia and Russia.

Grigoryan also voiced concern about the insecurity caused by the presence of terrorists and the armed forces of certain countries in the region, saying that Armenia has always warned others about the situation.

EAM S Jaishankar discusses ‘nurturing bonds’ with Armenia’s National Assembly president

Republic World, India
Oct 13 2021
Written By

Aanchal Nigam

IMAGE: @DrSJaishankar/Twitter


External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday met President of the National Assembly of Armenia Alen Simonyan and discussed bilateral ties. EAM Jaishankar, who was on a two-day visit to Armenia, shared images from his meeting with Simonyan on Twitter and expressed “pleasure” to meet with the latter. EAM Jaishankar said that he discussed the importance of “nurturing” the bonds between India and Armenia with the President of the National Assembly of Armenia. 

Jaishankar arrived in Yerevan on Tuesday and was welcomed by the Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan. On Tuesday, he became the first External Affairs Minister of India to have visited the country. On Sunday, Jaishankar kicked off a three-nation tour including Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Armenia. Jaishankar started off his tour in Armenia by paying tribute to the 1.5 million Armenians who were killed in the first genocide of the 20th century at the hands of the Turkish government.

After paying his homage to the victims of the genocide at Yerevan’s Tsitsernakaberd Memorial Complex, Jaishankar tweeted, “Began the day by paying homage at the Tsitsernakaberd Memorial Complex.” Apart from Simonyan, EAM also met with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Passhinyan on Wednesday and conveyed the greetings of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. According to Jaishankar’s tweet regarding his meeting with Pashinyan, EAM said that it “brought out the many convergences and shared outlook of our two countries…We agreed to develop a broad agenda of practical cooperation that is to our mutual benefit.”

Apart from meeting Armenian officials, Jaishakar visited the Matenadaran library in Yerevan where according to him, “the Armenia-India connect so visible.” He also posted the images of the first  Armenian newspaper and constitution that were published in Madras (Chennai) along with the copy of Mahabharata in Sanskrit.

Hailing “Ajanta in Armenia”, Jaishankar also witnessed the paintings of the caves by renowned Armenian Artist Sarkis Khachaturian at the National Gallery of Armenia in Yerevan. Earlier, while meeting with his Armenian counterpart, EAM stressed the need for elevating the connectivity between both nations. He tweeted saying that both officials “agreed on enhancing our trade, education and cultural exchanges.”

Armenia discussing new nuclear plant with Russian mining company

Nuclear Engineering
Oct 11 2021

 Email

The Armenian government is negotiating with the Russian mining company Geopromining on the construction of a new nuclear power plant, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan told parliament on 6 October during a parliament-Cabinet Q&A session. He said an offer had been made to Armenia by one of the owners of Geopromining, a member of the Board of Directors, “we discussed the offer, we saw that the offer corresponds to the economic and state interests of Armenia”. 

He added: “This includes two very important components: the first is the construction of a copper smelter, which means that Armenia will no longer export concentrate and import ready-made copper from somewhere else to be used in other products, but copper will be produced in Armenia. Second, the construction of a new nuclear power plant is part of this programme, and this large company has undertaken investment commitments for the establishment of a copper smelter, which has been duly recorded, and negotiations on the construction of a new nuclear power plant in Armenia have already started.”

Pashinyan stressed that participation of the Government in the process is important as a nuclear power plant cannot be built by a private company.

He noted that the construction of the new copper smelter should begin by June 2025, adding that it would be good if the operation of the copper smelter and the nuclear power plant coincide.

On 1 October, the Armenian government announced that Geopromining, which produces gold, antimony, copper and molybdenum in Russia and Armenia, had acquired 60% of the shares of the Zangezur Copper-Molybdenum Combine and transferred 15% of the total capital of the combine to the Armenian government. 

The currently operating Armenian nuclear power plant was built in the 1970s with two Soviet-supplied VVER-440-V230 units, but was closed following a devastating earthquake in 1988. However, unit 2 was recommissioned with Russian help in 1995 following severe energy shortages. In March 2014, the Armenian government decided to extend the plant’s service life to 2026. Most of the overhaul (until 2019) was funded by an interstate loan from the government of the Russian Federation, the remaining work is carried out at the expense of the budget of Armenia.

Construction of a new nuclear plant has long been part of Armenia’s overall plan. However, finance has been a problem in the past with Armenia unable to attract private investors. In addition, in the past Armenia met opposition to its plans from both Turkey and Azerbaijan. However, as Turkey is now building its own plant and Azerbaijan is also considering building a plant, such opposition is now less of an issue.

Armenia 2 has been closed for some time for life extension work. Plant director Movses Vardanyan said on 7 October that reconnection to the grid would be delayed because of the need for additional checks of repair work. According to the original plans, the outage was supposed to last 140 days – from 15 May to 2 October. However the scope of work turned out to be more than expected, so the plant management decided to double-check safety before restarting the reactor. Grid connection is tentatively scheduled for 10 October.

As part of the overhaul, which has been underway since 2015, the equipment of the turbine hall (generators, turbines and auxiliary equipment), the automation unit, as well as the protection and emergency cooling systems of the reactor have already been replaced. It remains to modernise the cooling towers (cooling towers), as well as build a new open switchgear (OSG), from where the generated electricity is fed to the grid.


Iran-Azerbaijan tensions are all about Israel and geopolitics

Oct 6 2021
Fardin Eftekhari
If the situation deteriorates and Baku opts not to address Tehran’s concerns and warnings, a direct confrontation could be on the cards

The 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war between Azerbaijan and Armenia had profound repercussions for Iran’s influence and policies in the South Caucasus. Tehran neither impacted the trajectory of the conflict nor exerted significant diplomatic influence in ceasefire negotiations and the ensuing peace agreement. 

Though Iran was the most relevant regional power in the conflict, bordering both Armenia and Azerbaijan, it was sidelined by Turkey and Russia. Tehran was obliged to align with Ankara and Moscow in supporting Baku’s territorial conquests, revealing a significant departure from its traditional pro-Armenia stance. 

From Iran’s point of view, it is Tel Aviv that provokes Baku to take a belligerent policy against Tehran and to challenge the geopolitical status quo

But Azerbaijan did not reciprocate Iran’s good faith. According to Iranian officials, Baku knowingly isolated Tehran in Nagorno-Karabakh’s reconstruction, while prioritising Israel and Arab and European countries.

Backed by mighty military powers such as Turkey, Israel and Pakistan, Azerbaijan felt it could flex its muscles against Iran’s regional power projection. Last month, Baku hosted a joint military drill with Ankara and Islamabad, aiming to further strengthen ties among the three countries and to bolster counterterrorism efforts. 

The joint drill contradicts the provisions of the Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea, which bans the “presence in the Caspian Sea of armed forces not belonging to the Parties” (Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan, the Russian Federation and Turkmenistan). On the margins of the drill, Baku tacitly challenged Iran’s connectivity with Armenia by disrupting Iranian trucks transiting a road that passes through Azerbaijan’s newly captured territories. Azerbaijan set up checkpoints, began charging fees to Iranian trucks, and even detained two Iranian truckers.

Unlike Azerbaijan’s attempt to depict recent incidents as routine procedure, Tehran sees this new, assertive Azerbaijan in a bigger picture, where Baku plays the anti-Iran “puppet” role for other regional powers hostile to Iran, such as Israel. 

Tehran initially tasked the Revolutionary Guard Corps with deploying equipment and troops across the country’s northwestern border. But this was just a small part of Iran’s grand plan to intimidate Baku. Days later, Tehran launched its own military drill near the Azerbaijani border, saying “we will never tolerate the presence of the fake Zionist regime” near the Iranian border, nor “any changes in the regional borders and geopolitics”.

This rare move, alongside hawkish comments by Iranian officials, suggests that Tehran is indeed concerned about the potential for grave geopolitical changes near its borders. 

Iranian army equipment near the Azerbaijani border on 1 October 2021 (Iranian Army Office/AFP)

Iran’s Kayhan newspaper, a publication close to hardliners, claimed that based on a Turkish-American plan, Armenia’s “western-oriented president”, in “collusion” with Baku, “intends to concede Armenia’s Syunik province to Azerbaijan”. This is the only conceivable reason for Iran’s outrage at Azerbaijan. 

Syunik province separates the rest of Azerbaijan from the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic exclave, and constitutes the Armenian border with Iran. The 2020 peace deal between Azerbaijan and Armenia guaranteed Azerbaijan a corridor to connect Nakhchivan to the rest of Azerbaijan via Syunik province. Previously, all connections were made through Iran in the south or Turkey in the west. 

Baku is apparently not satisfied with this plan, and maintains an ambitious goal to take all of Syunik province, which could put Iran in a disadvantageous geopolitical position. Tehran would lose its connection to Armenia and convenient access to the region, while being compelled to deal with a newly emboldened regional power that is heavily backed by Iran’s arch-enemy, Israel. 

From Iran’s point of view, it is Tel Aviv that provokes Baku to take a belligerent policy against Tehran and to challenge the geopolitical status quo. The title Tehran has chosen for its ongoing drills in the country’s northwest drives this point home: Fatehan-e Khaybar is a callback to the Battle of Khaybar in the year 628, in which the Prophet Mohammed confronted the Jews of the Khaybar region, who were inciting Arabian tribes against the Muslims of Medina. 

How the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict could ignite a Middle East flare-up

Read More »

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei recently warned Azerbaijan against aligning with Israel, noting: “Those who think that their security will be ensured by relying on foreigners should know that they will pay a hefty price.”

The type and scale of military equipment stationed at the border suggests that Iran intends to deter Baku from territorial adventurism, but Tehran ultimately wants to avoid an armed clash. If the situation deteriorates and Azerbaijan opts not to address Tehran’s concerns and warnings, Iran may cross the border to push preemptive deterrence from Armenian soil. A key factor at that point would be the extent to which Azerbaijan’s allies, primarily Turkey, would be prepared to support Baku and participate in a direct confrontation with Iran. 

Meanwhile, Iran seems determined not to step back without affirming its national security red lines, establishing a credible level of deterrence, and asserting its undeniable regional role, which has been somewhat tarnished amid the recent security developments in the South Caucasus. 

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.