Azerbaijani To Increase Defense Spending By 3,1%

AZERBAIJANI TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING BY 3,1%

by Marianna Lazarian

ARMINFO
Tuesday, October 14, 16:57

The defense spending of Azerbaijan for 2015 will make 17.9 percent
of the state budget expenditures, APA reports.

According to the draft budget released by the Ministry of Finance, the
military expenditures for 2015 will be 3.1 percent higher than 2014.

It also includes expenditures on the financial provision of projects
and activities for special purposes. Funds are planned to be
allocated from the state budget for defense and security agencies.

Incidentally, Russia’s Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu visited Baku
yesterday. According to the “Komertsant” daily, a part of Shoygu’s
talks was about the arms delivery. In 2010-2012 contracts were made
between Russia and Azerbaijan for the arms delivery for about $4
billion, In 2014 Azerbaijan will buy armament from Russia for $1
billion, the daily says.

Bako Sahakyan, Ara Abrahamyan Attend Opening Of New School Building

BAKO SAHAKYAN, ARA ABRAHAMYAN ATTEND OPENING OF NEW SCHOOL BUILDING IN STEPANAKERT

17:44 14/10/2014 >> SOCIETY

Artsakh Republic President Bako Sahakyan together with President of
the Union of Armenians of Russia Ara Abrahamyan attended the opening
of the new building of Stepanakert basic school N6.

President Sahakyan thanked Ara Abrahamyan for financing the
project, noting that it is among the best manifestations of the
Motherland-Diaspora cooperation.

Primate of the Artsakh Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church
Archbishop Pargev Martirosyan, Prime Minister Ara Harutyunyan and
other officials participated in the event, the Artsakh Republic
President’s press service reported.

Source: Panorama.am

Eduard Sharmazanov Says Cyprus Is Among The Countries Armenia Can Re

EDUARD SHARMAZANOV SAYS CYPRUS IS AMONG THE COUNTRIES ARMENIA CAN RELY ON

by Tatevik Shahunyan

ARMINFO
Tuesday, October 14, 16:59

Vice Speaker of the Armenian Parliament Eduard Sharmazanov and Head of
the Cypriot delegation the 131st Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary
Union (IPU) in Geneva Averof Neophytou discussed issues of the
Armenian-Cyprian cooperation on sidelines of the event.

The sides highly appreciated the warm friendly relations between the
parties. In this light, Sharmazanov said that Cyprus is one of the EU
countries Armenia can rely on at various international organizations.

As for the Karabakh conflict and the Cyprus issue, Sharmazanov said
that the two countries’ stands do not run contrary to each other. He
called inadmissible occupation of the part of Cyprus and Armenia’s
blockade by Turkey.

Sharmazanov thanked Cyprus for recognition and condemnation of
the Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Turkey and suggested the Cypriot
colleagues to hold an exhibition at the Cyprus Parliament timed to
the centenary of that tragedy. The Cypriot delegated welcomed the idea.

Montserrat Caballe Performs In Stepanakert

MONTSERRAT CABALLE PERFORMS IN STEPANAKERT

18:16, 14 Oct 2014

On 14 October Artsakh Republic President Bako Sahakyan was present
at the concert of the world-famous opera singer Montserrat Caballe
held at the Stepanakert Revival Square.

Bako Sahakyan noted that Montserrat Caballe has her unique place
in Artsakh’s life and has made a substantial contribution to the
development of culture in the country, which the President qualified
among the best manifestation of sincere friendship and humanity.

Primate of the Artsakh Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church
Archbishop Pargev Martirosyan, prime-minsiter Ara Haroutyunyan and
other officials were present at the event.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2014/10/14/montserrat-caballe-performs-in-stepanakert/

Putin Is A Gift For West And His Life Will Be Prolonged

PUTIN IS A GIFT FOR WEST AND HIS LIFE WILL BE PROLONGED

Igor Muradyan, Political Analyst
Comments – 14 October 2014, 23:38

Not a long time ago Putin insisted that the Russian General Staff
develop an operative plan of a large-scale landing operation in
Nikolayev and Odessa in order to annex these territories and thereby
leave Ukraine land-locked. It is clear that this would lead to the
annexation of Transdniestr and the Danube territories, which would
further strengthen Russia’s positions in the Black Sea Caucasus,
as well as the Mediterranean.

For a long time Moscow refused this plan because it would lead to a
clash with NATO. Developments that had not been planned by Russians
took place in the southeast of Ukraine which are occupied by Russian
troops. It became known that in the result of military actions the
Russian population is being displaced from these territories whereas
the Ukrainian population continues to stay there.

Each day of the war costs Russia 1-3 million dollars but this is
not the end. Russia did not succeed taking Mariupol, on which the
prospects of the southeast depended. The Ukrainians have moved on
to new methods of military actions, underground and guerilla war is
underway. The Russian propaganda has run out of resources and there
are new propaganda scenarios.

Having received the assistance and support of the West, Ukraine quickly
reorganized the armed forces. Of course, completion of this work will
last for many years but irregular groups of militants were bidden,
which was a success.

Moscow’s attempts to initiate protests of the Russian population of
Ukraine caused a backlash among Ukrainians and terrifying excesses
in several places. Russians and Ukrainians of Ukraine demonstrated
wisdom and did not go for such initiatives. Otherwise, Ukraine would
have turned to a bloody medley.

Moscow seems to be satisfied with the halves of Donetsk and Lugansk
that the Russians were able to take under their control. However, the
Russians are in embarrassment because they do not understand how to
report this occupation in a more or less legitimate way. The Russian
humanitarian science has not offered anything worth attention but
apparently it was not willing to offer anything. Russia does not need
these territories, not even in strategic terms but they are necessary
for Putin’s image. This is the purpose of this mess.

However, Russia is mainly focusing on the ways of escaping the
international isolation in which this huge country has appeared. The
United States and NATO have achieved their goals, i.e. created the
premises for the political and economic isolation of Russia, and they
need not weaken the isolation and return Russia among “designated”
countries.

It is clear that such tendencies as decrease of oil prices are
something new in the world and Europe and are intended to force Russia
to put up with the requirements of the West.

Russia’s two hopes – China and Germany -demonstrated extreme egotism.

China is trying to benefit from this difficult situation for Russia
and pump resources out of Russia for reasonable prices. Unlike other
states, Germany has used this situation to turn Russia to a priority
market for German industries.

Developments in Russia were an effective lever for normalization of
the global economy, shrinking and expanding of the European and Asian
markets, initiation of micro-crises of a regional scope.

An important goal is to mobilize and provide new purpose to NATO
which needs purposes for its goals and objectives.

“In some ways, NATO should thank Vladimir Putin,” Heather Conley,
senior vice president for Europe, Eurasia, and the Arctic of the
Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said. “It
was really searching for its purpose … and it was having a fairly
significant identity crisis. And it has now not only been repurposed,
it’s been reinvigorated.”

NATO purposes are a political and economic locomotive, first of
all, for the defense industry. At the same time, in its present
situation Russia is becoming a suitable target for manipulations
in all directions. The role of low-pay security guard is envisaged
for Russia in Eurasia to parry the expansion of China and Islamic
radicals towards Central Asia. At the same time, it is a scarecrow
for Central Europe and Japan.

Strangely, Russia is going through a transition from red
authoritarianism to a right one, and there is no chance to avoid this
path because the present regime is falling to pieces, and nobody has
a vision of the next regime. Among the narrow circles of Moscow-based
politicized authors Sergey Kurginyan preferred describing the current
political period in Russia as “rise before fall”, as well as the
“price for ignoring post-modern rules”.

However, the West does not mind Putin’s further rule, which guarantees
continuation of non-professionalism and profanation. Vladimir Putin is
a gift for the West and his political life will be possibly prolonged.

According to Moscow think-tanks, there are no groups in Vladimir
Putin’s team because there is no motivation to create groups. Everyone
is thinking for themselves, and everyone is trying to figure out the
future of the team and the president and thereby figure out their
own future. This indicates embarrassment.

The army is especially dissatisfied which is receiving a new
introductory note every week, first of all, on Ukraine’s goals. The
Ministry of Defense has already received a note on what problems are
coming up, , especially with the budget.

The Kremlin is sending all kinds of recommendations to government
agencies relating to certain goals in nearby regions, including the
South Caucasus. Apparently, Vladimir Putin is linking his image to
success in these directions which, however, leads to more problems.

The hangout of the Eurasian company in Minsk demonstrated how helpless,
uncertain and weak Russia is, and all it is capable of is influencing
Armenia. Relations with Belarus and Kazakhstan became uncertain
and suspicious.

The Eurasian project is transforming to an instrument of Turkish policy
and Azerbaijan’s caprice and difficult problems with the future state
of Russia are linked to the Eurasian project. This project will always
remain a marker of isolation and blockade, marginal existence of all
the participants.

To a certain degree such formations as CSTO and the Eurasian project
are favorable for the United States and NATO because the target
and borders of influence of Russia have been identified. They have
become a giant buffer on the Eurasian space in which Russia acts as
a watchdog of this degrading area.

Under such conditions, even without possible big conflict in Central
Asia involving Russia, the conflict in Ukraine which has become
chronic is sufficient to realize the model of Vietnam for Russia, i.e.

a lasting battle with ensuing consequences.

Ukrainian “Vietnam” will resolve a lot of issues of European security
and will waste huge resources of Russia’s. Will the South Caucasus
succeed staying aloof of these developments? Not, of course. The
South Caucasus is fully involved in these developments, and the closer
the countries of the region are connected with Russia, the worse the
consequences will be for them.

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/33100#sthash.FeLBd9yp.dpuf

Allies And Allegiances: Armenia Takes Russian-Azerbaijani Military T

ALLIES AND ALLEGIANCES: ARMENIA TAKES RUSSIAN-AZERBAIJANI MILITARY TIES IN ITS STRIDE

Analysis | 15.10.14 | 10:46

By Naira Hayrumyan
ArmeniaNow correspondent

Yerevan takes “normally” the deepening Russian-Azerbaijani
military-political cooperation, Armenian Defense Minister Seyran
Ohanyan stated on Tuesday.

On Monday, in Baku, the defense ministers of Azerbaijan and Russia
held talks after which a military cooperation plan for 2015 was
signed. “One of the major aspects of our work, of course, is the
strengthening of interstate cooperation in the Caspian Sea. To this
end, we discussed the prospect of creating a system of collective
security in the Caspian,” said Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu
after talks with his Azerbaijani counterpart Zakir Hasanov.

Speaking at the French University in Yerevan Armenian Defense Minister
Ohanyan said: “The Caspian Sea basin is quite a complex area, there
are five states there and they should cooperate. We normally look at
this cooperation that will lead to the fact that security issues in
the region are put on a higher level.”

Azerbaijani media on a daily basis interview Russian experts, who in
one voice say that Russia is cooperating with Azerbaijan in order to
prevent NATO forces from entering the Caspian Sea region. Experts
say that Azerbaijan was close to let NATO into the Caspian as
the North-Atlantic alliance is going to control the laying of a
trans-Caspian pipeline.

However, Moscow torpedoes the construction of the pipeline that is
designed to become part of the western communication system bypassing
Russia. A few weeks ago the Russian city of Astrakhan hosted the
summit of the five Caspian nations that made only one decision – to
prevent “third countries” from entering the Caspian region. Russian
experts link the military cooperation between Russia and Azerbaijan
with these circumstances.

Nevertheless, this cooperation cannot but cause concern in Armenia,
which is in a state of undeclared war with Azerbaijan. More importantly
is that Russia is Armenia’s military ally as both nations are members
of the Collective Security Treaty Organization.

Director of the Armenian Center for National and International Studies
Manvel Sargsyan said in an interview with RFE/RL’s Armenian Service
that after the sale of weapons to Azerbaijan Moscow gradually moves
towards forming a military-political alliance with Baku.

“Russia is trying its best to assure [Armenia] that the sale of weapons
is just business, but in the end it became clear that it is a new
strategy of Russia,” said Sargsyan. According to the expert, Moscow
is deliberately keeping the two South Caucasus states, locked in a
bitter conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, highly dependent on Russian
weapons so that in the future they fulfill its decisions.

Meanwhile, a high-ranking Russian military delegation led by commander
of the Russian Armed Forces Engineering Troops Yuri Stavitsky has
arrived in Armenia. On October 14-17, a working group of the Office
on Radiation, Chemical and Biological Protection of the Russian Armed
Forces is also on a visit to Armenia.

http://armenianow.com/commentary/analysis/57619/armenia_azerbaijan_military_cooperation

L’ex-International Armenien Eric Assadourian Confie A La Depeche.Fr

L’ex-international armenien Eric Assadourian confie a La Depeche.fr ses >

AVANT ARMENIE-FRANCE

Le franco-armenien Eric Assadourian, international francais Espoirs
et international armenien, n’a pas le coeur armenien ! Dans une
declaration accordee a La Depeche.fr avant le match Armenie-France,
Eric Assadourian confirme son peu d’enthousiasme pour la chose
armenienne… Alors qu’il etait slectionne a 12 reprises et marque
3 bus sous les couleurs de l’Armenie entre 1996 et 1998 -lors des
rencontres de qualifications pour la Coupe du monde 1998-, Eric
Assadourian qui a egalement evolue de 1999 a 2001 au club armenien
de Valence, l’ASOA Valence, ne se sent pas concerne par l’Armenie !

International armenien qui est l’actuel directeur du Centre de
formation de Brest (L2) repond a la question de La Depech.fr > Eric
Assadourian dit >. A la question >, Eric Assadourian repond >.

Lorsque le journaliste rappelle a Eric Assadourian au sujet de la
selection armenienne > il repond >. Au rappel du match nul (2-2)
retentissant decroche par l’Armenie en automne dernier a Naples contre
l’Italie, Eric Assadourian repond >. Puis finalement lorsque La Depeche.fr
questionne .

Une deception pour Eric Assadourian avec l’Armenie, sa carrière
internationale se termine avant la rencontre France-Armenie du 31 mars
1999 au Stade de France. >.

Le pronostic d’Eric Assadourian pour ce match Armenie-France est de
4-0…pour la France.

Precisons que Michel Der-Zakarian a dans une declaration au Republicain
Lorrain declare qu’il etait fier de l’Armenie…

Krikor Amirzayan

mardi 14 octobre 2014, Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

Faut-Il Exclure La Turquie De L’OTAN ?

FAUT-IL EXCLURE LA TURQUIE DE L’OTAN ?

JERUSALEM POST

Une fois encore, la Turquie a montre qu’elle etait la moins fiable des
“alliees” des Etats-Unis et de l’Otan.

Lorsque les Etats-Unis et l’Otan ont demande l’aide de la Turquie
pour prevenir un desastre humanitaire a Kobani, près de sa frontière,
la Turquie s’est croise les bras une fois de plus. Pour une raison
en evidente : les dirigeants turcs aimeraient voir tues le plus grand
nombre de Kurdes.

Les Kurdes de Turquie, de Syrie et d’Irak sont a la recherche d’un
etat independant depuis beaucoup plus longtemps que les Palestiniens,
avec des arguments beaucoup plus forts en droit ou relatifs a la
diplomatie, a la morale, et a leur identite ethnique. Historiquement,
les Turcs ont toujours eu une reponse aux aspirations de ceux qui
reclamaient leur independance – le massacre.

Les Turcs ont massacre les Armeniens. Ils nient pourtant encore leur
responsabilite dans ce genocide bien documente. Ils ont au contraire
erige en crime le fait d’admettre que la Turquie ait commis un
genocide contre les Armeniens. Et maintenant les Turcs font tout ce
qu’ils peuvent pour aider au massacre d’un autre de leurs ennemis :
les Kurdes. Comme le resume justement un Kurde : ” Ils ne veulent pas
aider ceux qu’ils considèrent comme leurs ennemis. C’est pour cette
raison que la Turquie souhaite que Kobani tombe aux mains de l’EISL “.

Meme avant cette recente duplicite, le gouvernement turc a refuse
d’autoriser l’Otan a atterrir sur son territoire ou a fournir a la
guerre contre l’Etat Islamique un soutien logistique. Que penser d’un
” allie ” qui refuse son aide en temps de crise ?

Les Turcs se sont egalement dresses contre Israël, leur plus fiable
allie dans la region, prenant pour pretexte que les soldats et marins
israeliens se soient defendus contre l’attaque de ressortissants turcs
potentiellement mortelles, qui se sont reveles pour certains etre
des terroristes, en train d’essayer de forcer illegalement un blocus
maritime israelien legitime instaure pour empecher l’importation de
roquettes par le Hamas. Le president de Turquie, Recep Erdogan, usant
au cours de sa campagne electorale, de tropes antisemites, a dresse
son pays contre Israël, qui avait ete precedemment un allie politique
et militaire important de l’etat-nation juif. L’ego maniaque Erdogan
exige les abjectes excuses – du Vice-president des USA Joe Biden et
du Premier-ministre Benjamin Netanyahu – alors meme qu’il n’y a pas
matière a excuses. Ensuite, ayant recu ces excuses, il se renie et
persiste dans ses visees pernicieuses.

Mais ce sont les refus purs et simples de la Turquie de satisfaire a
ses obligations de partenaire de l’Otan qui ont provoque la colère
de l’administration Obama et des allies de l’Amerique. Un officiel
de haut rang de l’administration Obama l’a exprime en declarant : ”
Une hostilite croissante envers la Turquie qui traîne les pieds pour
agir en prevision d’un massacre a moins d’un kilomètre de sa frontière.

Après toutes ces vociferations sur la catastrophe humanitaire syrienne,
ils inventent des raisons pour ne pas agir en prevision d’une autre
catastrophe. Cela n’est pas ainsi qu’agit un allie de l’Otan lorsque
l’enfer se profile a moins d’un jet de pierre de sa frontière “.

Les experts conviennent qu’Erdogan prend les civils de Kobani en
otage afin d’arracher des concessions aux Etats-Unis et aux dirigeants
Kurdes. Si ses demandes ne sont pas satisfaites, il laissera l’Etat
islamique massacrer des milliers de Kurdes. Et les massacres auront
lieu. Il y a 12 000 civils a Kobani, qui ont ete qualifies de
” bastion de la democratie et du secularisme “. Si la ville est
prise par l’Etat Islamique, il est probable que ses residents seront
confrontes au choix entre la conversion et la mort – si cette chance
leur est offerte. D’autres Kurdes captures n’ont pas eu le choix. Ils
ont simplement ete abattus ou decapites.

Si Erdogan est le reflet quelque part de Vladimir Poutine, c’est parce
que l’autocrate turc s’est lui-meme efforce de prendre l’autocrate
russe comme modèle. Les deux a la fois sont devenus immensement
populaires chez eux par leur approche conflictuelle de la politique
etrangère, assimilee a une lutte dans laquelle on ne fait pas de
prisonniers. Ils ne se soucient nullement de ce que le monde pense
d’eux ou de leur strategie, tout en critiquant hypocritement les
autres nations de ne pas se conformer aux normes et aux lois qu’ils
defient eux-memes.

Les seules raisons qui expliquent que la Turquie soit maintenue au
sein de l’Otan – et ce sont ces memes raisons avaient motive son
admission dans cette organisation aux origines ” Nord-atlantiques
“, sont sa position strategique et sa puissante armee. Mais ces
points forts n’ont jamais ete partages avec ses allies de l’Otan ;
a quoi peuvent-ils dès lors servir ? Il y a de toute evidence, dans la
region, un autre pays avec une position strategique et une armee forte,
allie des Etats-Unis, et qui serait un allie fiable au sein de l’Otan.

Cette nation ne devrait jamais rejeter une demande americaine tendant
a defaire un Etat islamique ou aider a prevenir une catastrophe
humanitaire. Cette nation, c’est Israël, a qui on n’a jamais offert de
devenir un allie de l’Otan. La substitution de la Turquie par Israël
serait du genre gagnant-gagnant. Mais il ne faut pas trop y compter.

mardi 14 octobre 2014, Ara (c)armenews.com

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Should-Turkey-be-thrown-out-of-NATO-378495
http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=104226

Match Amical Armenie-France Ce Soir En Direct Sur TF1 Des 17h50

MATCH AMICAL ARMENIE-FRANCE CE SOIR EN DIRECT SUR TF1 DES 17H50

FOOTBALL
4ème rencontre entre la France et l’Armenie

Ce soir a 18 heures (heure de Paris), au stade Republicain a Erevan,
se deroulera le match Armenie-France match amical (la France etant
qualifiee d’office) dans le cadre de l’Euro 2016 de football. Le
match est diffuse en direct sur TF1 dès 17h50. A noter que dès 17h15
certaines chaines comme iTv (chaîne 16 sur la TNT) ou l’Equipe TV
(chaîne 21 sur la TNT) seront en direct d’Erevan pour l’avant-match

Ce sera la 4ème rencontre de l’Histoire entre la France et l’Armenie.

Les 3 precedentes etant gagnees par la France. Le premier match entre
la selection d’Armenie et la France s’est deroule le 5 juin 1996,
match amical joue a Lille et remporte par les Bleus sur le score de
2-0. Le deuxième match entre la France et l’Armenie s’est deroule
31 mars 1999 a Saint Denis. La France s’imposant une nouvelle fois
sur le score de 2-0 dans ce matche dans le cadre des qualifications
de l’Euro 2000 (buts de Sylvain Wiltord et Christophe Dugarry. Le 8
septembre 1999 s’est deroule la troisième rencontre entre la France
et l’Armenie, toujours dans le cadre de l’Euro 2000 au stade > a Erevan. La France gagnant sur le score de 3-2. Les
buts de l’Armenie furent inscrits par Garabed Mikaelian et Armen
Chahgueldian. Youri Djorkaeff, Zinedine Zidane et Lilian Laslandes
marquant pour la France. La France qui fut championne d’Europe en 2000.

Photo : Vartan Khatchatryan le capitaine de l’equipe d’Armenie et
Didier Deschamps lors de France-Armenie (31 mars 1999).

Krikor Amirzayan

mardi 14 octobre 2014, Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=104224

Armenian Businesses Should Abandon Personal Leadership, Manfred FR K

ARMENIAN BUSINESSES SHOULD ABANDON PERSONAL LEADERSHIP, MANFRED FR KETS DE VRIES

YEREVAN, October 14. / ARKA /. Armenian businesses should abandon the
principle of personal leadership, Manfred FR Kets de Vries, the founder
of INSEAD graduate business school and president of KDVI leadership
development consulting company, told Armenian journalists on Tuesday.

“Armenia has strong leaders, which comes from autocratic leadership
in ancient Armenia and also in the Soviet period, leaving its mark
on leadership,” he said at a leadership skills development master
class organized by Ameria Group of Companies.

He said it is desirable that Armenian business people adopt the
Mediterranean type of business organization system, in which the
focus is on the network leadership principle.

“You need to be able to create different teams, including through
virtual management without a single leader, but it is difficult in
Armenia, where preference is given to personal directors or managers.

The so-called mixed type of control prevails in Armenia, which can
be called as ‘neo-patriarchal management system.’ But there are some
positive trends as well and what is to be done is to be more open
and communicative,” said Manfred FR Kets de Vries.

He noted that the leadership has several fundamental bases – the
ability to assess oneself for rational decision-making, the ability
to get maximum results from subordinates; to overcome arrogance;
also teamwork and productive and easy atmosphere in the team.

According to INSEAD management professor Elisabet Engellau, the course
initiated by Ameria Group of Companies should help the participants
develop ambitions and a vision of future and learn also how to build
personal or professional relationships in the team.

In turn, Ameria Group of Companies development director Tigran
Jrbashyan said the company is actively investing in the development
of its team and has the opportunity to invite the world’s best experts
in the field of leadership.

“This is the second such event, we have had and the results are very
impressive – the team is inspired by communicating with the best world
experts, which contributes to the development of the business. Expert
advice is being actively put into practice and radically changes the
perception of the goals of teamwork, having a good impact on the work,
helping to change the mindset of employees, which is very important
in team work,” said Jrbashyan.

Professor Manfred FR Kets de Vries is conducting “2014 Leadership
Challenges” master classes for senior and middle managers of Ameria
Group of Companies and its partners.

Ruben Vardanyan, founder-partner of Moscow Skolkovo School
of Management and Vice President of the International Advisory
Board, Nubar Afeyan, a senior management lecturer at Sloan School
of Management of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Gor
Nahapetyan from Skolkovo School of Management, Robert von Rekowski,
Fidelity Investment portfolio manager and some others shared their
experience in leadership skills development.

Ameria Group of Companies are among the most aggressively developing
institutions in the Armenian market, providing professional legal and
management services, investment advice and implementation of business
projects, as well as financial and banking services. -0-

15:41 14.10.2014

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/armenian_businesses_should_abandon_personal_leadership_manfred_fr_kets_de_vries/#sthash.uCJeGjk6.dpuf