Un site officiel armeniangenocide100.org pour centraliser les manife

GENOCIDE ARMENIEN
Un site officiel armeniangenocide100.org pour centraliser les
manifestations liées au 100ème anniversaire du génocide arménien

Hier 30 janvier a été ouvert le site armeniangenocide100.org. Dédié au
100ème anniversaire du génocide arménien, cet imposant site est en
arménien, russe et anglais. Selon son créateur Haroutioun Berberian,
le site recensera de très nombreux articles liés aux manifestations du
100ème anniversaire du génocide arménien ainsi que d’autres articles
de la presse internationale liés au génocide. Selon Vicken Sarkissian,
membres du gouvernement arménien et coordinateur des manifestations du
centenaire du génocide, l’objectif principal du site n’est pas de
réunir et de compiler les informations liées au génocide, mais d’avoir
un attrait éducatif. >affirme Vicken Sarkissian qui dit
également que le site centralisera un très grand nombre d’informations
sur le génocide arménien et les manifestations en Arménie et à travers
le monde.

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 31 janvier 2015,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=107590

La Turquie prête à payer le prix des massacres d’Arméniens si elle e

génocide-histoire-Turquie-Arménie
La Turquie prête à payer le prix des massacres d’Arméniens si elle est
coupable (Erdogan)

Istanbul, 30 jan 2015 (AFP) – La Turquie est prête à “payer le prix”
si elle est reconnue par des historiens indépendants coupable des
massacres d’Arméniens commis à partir de 1915, a assuré le président
turc Recep Tayyip Erdogan, qui a rejeté à nouveau leur qualification
en “génocide”.

“Si les résultats des recherches devaient révéler que nous avons
commis un crime, si nous devons en payer le prix, nous prendrons les
mesures nécessaires”, a déclaré M. Erdogan lors d’un entretien
télévisé diffusé jeudi soir sur la chaîne publique TRT.

Les autorités turques nient catégoriquement que l’Empire ottoman ait
organisé le massacre systématique de sa population arménienne pendant
la Première guerre mondiale.

Ankara reconnaît la mort d’environ 500.000 Arméniens, qui s’étaient
rangés du côté de son ennemie la Russie, lors de combats ou à cause de
famines. Les Arméniens évoquent à l’inverse le génocide d’environ 1,5
million d’entre eux.

En avril 2014, le président Erdogan, alors Premier ministre, avait
offert des condoléances sans précédent pour les victimes arméniennes,
parlant d’une “douleur commune”. Mais il écarté l’idée de reconnaître
un génocide à l’occasion du centième anniversaire, cette année, des
événements de 1915.

“Nous ne sommes pas obligés de reconnaître le soi-disant génocide
arménien sur les ordres de quelqu’un”, a-t-il souligné jeudi soir,
“nous ne pouvons pas accepter une chose pareille”.

La veille, le président français François Hollande a appelé la Turquie
à faire un “effort de vérité” sur ces événements, estimant qu’il était
l’heure de “briser des tabous”.

Le chef de l’Etat islamo-conservateur turc a appelé les homes
politiques à laisser cette question aux historiens.

“Si vous êtes vraiment sincères, laissez les historiens faire leur
travail”, a-t-il dit. “Nous avons ouvert nos archives et mis plus d’un
million de documents à disposition. Si l’Arménie dispose aussi
d’archives, elle doit les ouvrir également. Ensuite nous pourrons nous
asseoir et parler entre dirigeants politiques”, a conclu M. Erdogan.

samedi 31 janvier 2015,
Stéphane (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=107601

Studenti lecchesi alla Casa Armena, lezione di storia e di vita

LeccoNotizie.com, Italia
29 gen 2015

Studenti lecchesi alla Casa Armena, lezione di storia e di vita

di C.Bott.

LECCO – “Questa settimana noi ragazzi di seconda del Liceo scientifico
ci siamo recati in visita a Hay Dun, la Casa Armena di Milano, in
occasione della Giornata della memoria. Rispetto alla Shoah il
genocidio armeno è sottovalutato, principalmente per ragioni
politiche. Ed è proprio per questo che, su proposta del nostro
insegnante di Lettere, abbiamo deciso di approfondire l’argomento”.

Inizia così il resoconto di una giornata che rimarrà impressa a lungo
negli occhi, nel cuore e nei sentimenti degli studenti del Collegio
Volta di Lecco, che nel capoluogo lombardo – oltre ad avere conosciuto
la presidentessa di Casa Armena, Marina Mavian, che ha raccontato loro
la storia avventurosa e quasi incredibile della sua famiglia,
miracolosamente scampata ai massacri – hanno anche incontrato il
professor Aldo Ferrari, armenista dell’Università Ca’ Foscari di
Venezia, esperto di Russia e Caucaso e ricercatore presso l’Istituto
di politica internazionale.

Degli armeni si parla poco, compreso sui libri di scuola, e di loro si
sa qualcosa soltanto del genocidio, mentre pressoché nulla si conosce
della loro storia millenaria. Così il docente ha ritenuto opportuno
colmare questa lacuna, offrendo ai ragazzi una panoramica sulla storia
armena dall’antichità fino all’inizio del ‘900 e ricordando come
l’Armenia storica fosse un grande territorio che si estendeva su zone
ora appartenenti alla Turchia, alla regione del Caucaso e, in parte,
all’Iran.

Ferrari ha altresì evidenziato alcune questioni legate alla Chiesa
armena, appartenente alle Chiese orientali che non hanno accettato il
Concilio di Calcedonia del 451, per poi affrontare il capitolo dei
rapporti tra Cristianesimo e Islam, cruciale dal punto di vista
storico e particolarmente attuale.

“Quando si parla di Islam – ha detto tra l’altro – vi sono due
estremi, entrambi da evitare: una visione “nera”, che dipinge l’Islam
come violento, aggressivo e arretrato, e una visione “rosa” secondo
cui l’Islam è tollerante, aperto e colto. Cosa può dire uno storico?
Di certo l’Islam prevede che le religioni monoteistiche abbiano
diritto all’esistenza: aspetto molto importante, soprattutto se
pensiamo che spesso, nella storia, i cristiani non si sono dimostrati
altrettanto tolleranti”.

Il professor Aldo Ferrari. Il professor Aldo Ferrari.

“Il professor Ferrari – osservano gli studenti lecchesi reduci
dall’incontro di Milano – ha poi amaramente constatato che, come la
storia insegna, alla discriminazione ci si abitua, ma non ci si può
abituare all’insicurezza quotidiana. E’ proprio questo fattore, ossia
la totale mancanza di sicurezza, ad avere spinto molti armeni a
emigrare, intorno all’XI secolo, sia in Oriente sia in Europa. E come
gli ebrei sono stati per secoli oggetto di invidie, maldicenze e astio
sfociati in qualcosa di tremendo, in un male assoluto”.

I primi gravi episodi ai danni degli armeni avvennero nel biennio
1894-1896. Sono i cosiddetti massacri Hamidiani, dal nome del sultano
Abdul Hamid II, che causarono 200.000 morti. Questi massacri, per
quanto terribili, non possono essere chiamati genocidio in assenza del
decisivo elemento della pianificazione.

Il genocidio avvenne invece nel 1915. “I Giovani turchi al potere dal
1908 – osservano gli studenti del “Volta” – avevano notato che Francia
e Germania erano Paesi forti e abitati da popolazioni etnicamente
omogenee, mentre l’impero era un vero e proprio mosaico di popoli. La
loro idea era omogeneizzare lo Stato, un progetto politico
inevitabilmente criminale. E l’occasione fu offerta loro dallo scoppio
della prima guerra mondiale”.

A Costantinopoli vivevano 200mila armeni, ma fu uccisa soltanto
l’élite. La ragione era che lì si trovavano tutte le ambasciate
straniere, per cui non si poteva fare uno sterminio eccessivo. Per
primi furono eliminati gli uomini adulti arruolati, fucilati o fatti
morire di fatica. Donne, vecchi e bambini furono invece deportati,
destinazione il deserto siriano. Un’intera popolazione fu spazzata
via. Gli armeni della regione che dagli stessi turchi era chiamata
Ermenistan sono stati totalmente cancellati e oggi gli armeni in
Turchia sono 40.000, tutti a Istanbul. Nella vecchia Armenia non ce
n’è neppure uno.

“Ci è stato spiegato – concludono gli studenti lecchesi – che il
genocidio fu criminale, feroce, spietato ma razionale a differenza
della Shoah, che ha avuto elementi di follia tipicamente nazisti. Al
termine della splendida lezione siamo tornati alle nostre case con una
domanda: cosa spinge l’uomo a commettere azioni così atroci e
“disumane”? Noi possiamo soltanto continuare a studiare il passato, a
ricordarlo e a lavorare quotidianamente per costruire un mondo
migliore, in cui a tutti sia riconosciuta la piena dignità di esseri
umani”.

http://www.lecconotizie.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Aldo-Ferrari_armeni_genocidio-300×474.jpg?7f5cea
http://www.lecconotizie.com/attualita/studenti-lecchesi-alla-casa-armena-lezione-di-storia-e-di-vita-218485/

Francesco: una Messa in ricordo del genocidio degli armeni

Aleteia- Italia
28 gen 2015

Francesco: una Messa in ricordo del genocidio degli armeni

Sarà celebrata il 12 aprile a S. Pietro per il centenario di Metz
Yeghern, il “Grande Male”. Tensione tra Armenia e Turchia a proposito
delle celebrazioni

Chiara Santomiero

Il 24 aprile del 2015 ricorre il centenario dell’inizio del massacro
di un milione e mezzo di armeni ad opera del governo dei Giovani
Turchi del padre della moderna Turchia, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Gli
armeni lo indicano come Metz Yeghern, il “Grande Male”.

Nell’ambito della commemorazione, in Italia e nel mondo di questi
avvenimenti, papa Francesco, secondo quanto stabilito dal calendario
delle celebrazioni presiedute dal pontefice tra febbraio e aprile,
celebrerà una Santa Messa a S. Pietro per i fedeli di rito armeno alle
ore 10 del 12 aprile, domenica della Divina Misericordia.

GENOCIDIO O STERMINIO?

Gli storici non sono ancora d’accordo sull’attribuzione della
definizione di “genocidio” (riconosciuta in presenza di precise
caratteristiche della persecuzione contro “un gruppo nazionale,
etnico, razziale o religioso”), ma in molti ritengono che lo sterminio
della popolazione armena di Istanbul e in tutta l’area dell’ex impero
ottomano sia stato il preludio a ognuno dei grandi massacri del
Novecento, dalla Shoah, ricordata il 27 gennaio con la Giornata della
memoria, al massacro di Srebenica (8 mila musulmani inermi uccisi dai
serbi) del conflitto nella ex Yugoslavia e del quale quest’anno
ricorrerà il ventennio.

Secondo Raz Segal, 39enne storico dell’Università di Tel Aviv che da
anni studia i paralleli e le differenze tra diversi genocidi:
(L’Espresso 27 gennaio).

IL NEGAZIONISMO TURCO

La Messa presieduta da papa Francesco il 12 aprile si inserisce tra le
numerose commemorazioni che si sono aperte ufficialmente in Armenia
nei giorni scorsi e che dureranno per tutto l’anno. Il prossimo 23
aprile il patriarca armeno ortodosso Karekin II presiederà la
canonizzazione di massa di un milione e mezzo di uomini, donne e
bambini armeni morti a causa della loro appartenenza etnica e
religiosa. Nella lettera enciclica scritta per l’occasione Karekin ha
ricordato che “nel 1915 e negli anni successivi un milione e mezzo di
nostri figli e figlie ha subito la morte, la fame, la malattia; è
stato deportato e costretto a camminare fino alla morte” (Il
Sismografo 27 gennaio).

Il patriarca ha sottolineato il mancato riconoscimento del genocidio
da parte delle istituzioni turche, dai tempi del fondatore Ataturk
fino all’attuale presidente Erdogan, cui si accompagna una “negazione
criminale della Turchia”, cioè un’opera attiva di negazionismo.

“GUERRA” DI COMMEMORAZIONI

Per la Turchia è difficile riconoscere degli eventi storici la cui
crudeltà coinvolge gli stessi padri fondatori della moderna
repubblica. Qualche apertura diplomatica verso l’Armenia non ha mai
preso in considerazione la possibilità di riconoscere il “genocidio”:
per i turchi le vittime furono “solo” 350 mila e per la maggior parte
morirono per “tragica fatalità” durante i trasferimenti coatti della
popolazione armena nell’est del Paese.

L’anno scorso, tuttavia, in occasione del 24 aprile e della memoria
del “Grande Male”, il presidente Erdogan inviò un messaggio con il
quale offrì le condoglianze ai discendenti degli armeni morti “nelle
circostanze dell’inizio del XX secolo”, specificando che “è un dovere
umano capire e condividere la volontà degli armeni di commemorare le
loro sofferenze durante quel periodo”.

Quest’anno, nel timore delle ricadute politiche delle celebrazioni che
si svolgeranno a Yerevan il 24 aprile prossimo, il governo turco ha
deciso di anticipare di due giorni l’anniversario della vittoria nella
battaglia dei Dardanelli del 1915 (di solito ricordata il 25 aprile)
proponendo a 102 capi di Stato e di governo – tra cui il presidente
armeno Serzh Sargsyan – un vertice per la pace a Istanbul proprio il
24 aprile. “Un tentativo grossolano – lo ha definito nella risposta a
Erdogan il presidente armeno – di distrarre l’attenzione della
comunità internazionale dalla commemorazione del centennale del
genocidio armeno”.

IL “GIORNO DELLE MEMORIE”

Di fronte alla “contabilità” dei morti e ai contorcimenti diplomatici,
assume maggior significato la proposta dello scrittore Moni Ovadia che
vorrebbe trasformare la “Giornata della memoria” istituita il 27
aprile in ricordo delle vittime della Shoah che non furono solo ebrei
ma anche “rom, antifascisti, omosessuali, menomati, Testimoni di
Geova, slavi, emarginati, militari che rifiutarono di piegarsi ai
nazifascisti” in “Giorno delle memorie”. “La nuova denominazione –
scrive lo scrittore – dovrebbe riorientare le manifestazioni, gli
studi, l’edificazione della casa della Memoria come laboratorio della
cultura di pace, di giustizia, di uguaglianza nel ricordo di tutti i
genocidi e degli stermini di massa” (gariwo.net).

http://www.aleteia.org/it/dal-mondo/articolo/francesco-messa-ricordo-genocidio-armeni-5899250785320960

ANKARA: Armenian genocide denial case comes before ECtHR

Cihan News Agency, Turkey
Jan 30 2015

Armenian genocide denial case comes before ECtHR

ISTANBUL – 30.01.2015 08:56:30

Last week I was talking to a law professor from the US. To give him a
glimpse into the level of nationalism found in Turkey, I said, `Just
look at how all these Turkish people with different worldviews around
this table unite when I say something.’ Then I proceeded to say,
`Turkey still denies the Armenian genocide.’ Just as I had predicted,
the professor witnessed quite a heated debate over my words.

Most people in Turkey united behind DoÄ?u Perinçek in his case before
the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on Tuesday. It’s a long
story, but for those of you who do not know the Perinçek v.
Switzerland case, it can be summarized as follows: During a conference
in Switzerland, Perinçek said that the `Armenian genocide is an
international lie.’ He was given a prison sentence and fine under
Swiss laws punishing the denial of genocide. According to these laws,
to my understanding, denying any genocide constitutes hate speech or
racism.

Perinçek brought this case to the ECtHR, and the ECtHR found that he
breached Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights
regulating freedom of expression. This past Thursday an appeal hearing
on the case was held in Strasbourg.

I am personally a little ambivalent about punishing the denial of any
genocide unless the words concerned clearly constitute hate speech
targeting a certain vulnerable group. When it comes to freedom of
expression, the stakes are too high, and therefore limitations to it
should really be exceptional.

However, when I look at the comments and reactions to the case in
Turkey, I see that people see this case as the ECtHR’s refusal to
define the events of 1915 as genocide. People in Turkey should focus
on another case: the Taner Akçam v. Turkey case, in which the ECtHR
criticized and condemned Turkey for limiting the debate on Armenian
genocide with prosecution and the threat of prosecution under the
infamous Article 301 that prohibits `denigrating Turkishness.’

If people genuinely defend Perinçek’s freedom of expression concerning
the Armenian genocide, they should then defend people in Turkey who
claim that what happened in 1915 was genocide.

When it comes to freedom of expression, as I said above, there is a
clear and undisputable exception to it that should be banned and
punished: hate speech and threats. Just remember how `The Cut,’ a film
shot by Fatih Akın whose central theme is the events of 1915, was
received in Turkey. Even before it was shown in cinemas, Akın and
Agos, the Armenian-Turkish weekly that interviewed him about the film,
were openly threatened by several ultranationalist organizations. In
some of these threats posted on Twitter they even dared to say, `We
are watching you with our white berets.’ This was a reference to the
fact that Hrant Dink’s murderer was wearing a white beret when he shot
Dink from behind. I have not heard about anyone being arrested for
these threats. When Akın’s film hit theaters, only viewers above the
age of 18 were allowed to watch it.

You see, if we really wish to discuss `freedom of expression’ and the
Armenian genocide debate, there is still a long way to go in Turkey.
And focusing on the Perinçek case, in which the ECtHR rejected using a
prison sentence to punish genocide denial, would not bring anyone in
Turkey closer to furthering freedom of expression or enriching
democracy in this country.

ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ

http://en.cihan.com.tr/news/Armenian-genocide-denial-case-comes-before-ECtHR_4117-CHMTY2NDExNy81

Are Rumors Replacing News in Azerbaijan?

EurasiaNet.org
Jan 30 2015

Azerbaijan: Are Rumors Replacing News in Azerbaijan?

January 30, 2015 – 1:33pm, by Nargiz Rashid

The media climate is growing so grim in Azerbaijan that some observers
are reminded of an old Soviet-era adage that just about the only safe
topic for public discussion is the weather.

A government crackdown over the past year, carried out in the wake of
the Euromaidan revolution that toppled the government in Ukraine, has
muzzled independent voices and public critics of President Ilham
Aliyev’s administration in Azerbaijan.

The crackdown is continuing unabated. Earlier in January, the
alternative news site Mediaforum.az announced its closure. It blamed
complicated new requirements for receiving grants; rules, it alleged,
had prevented the site from receiving financing. The online entity
Channel 13, which once posted some 15 video stories a day, also has
shut down.

“Our bank accounts were frozen and we could not receive money from our
donors,” Channel 13’s former general manager, Anar Orujov, told
EurasiaNet.org. “We had to stop working.” Orujov now studies abroad.

Other outlets have been forced to close offices in Baku and shift
operations outside Azerbaijan.

One of the main sources of in-depth news about Azerbaijan, the
US-government-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFERL), now
covers the country only out of its headquarters in Prague. In late
December 2014, representatives of the general prosecutor’s office
raided and shut RFERL’s Baku bureau. Some 40 reporters were forcibly
detained and interrogated without the presence of a lawyer.

Prior to the closure of RFERL’s bureau, Berlin-based Meydan TV, an
outlet known for outspoken criticism of the Aliyev administration,
opted to close its own Baku office in an effort to shield its
reporters from official harassment.

The action against RFERL followed the December 5 arrest of RFERL
investigative reporter Khadija Ismayilova on charges of inciting an
attempted suicide. [Editor’s note: Ismayilova also has worked for
EurasiaNet.org]. Ismayilova and international media watchdogs maintain
the arrest was politically motivated. On January 27, a court extended
Ismayilova’s pre-trial detention by two months, until April 5.

Officials and government supporters dispute the notion that the Aliyev
administration strives to cut off the free flow of information. Zahid
Oruj, an unaffiliated MP who tends to support ruling Yeni Azerbaijan
Party positions, insisted that foreign-funded media organizations such
as RFERL do not enjoy a sufficient level of popularity among Azeri
listeners to be a concern to the government. Oruj also claimed that
the new restrictions on foreign financing for non-governmental
organizations are intended promote transparency.

Meanwhile, at a recent news conference in Berlin, President Aliyev
declared that freedom of speech in Azerbaijan is “guaranteed 100
percent.”

To buttress their claims, Aliyev and others point out that roughly
three-quarters of Azerbaijan’s roughly 9.42 million citizens have
Internet access. Outside reports on Azerbaijani media, however,
contend that while greater freedom exists in social media, residents
outside of urban centers still have relatively limited access to the
Internet. And prosecution for criticism of the government, even on
social media networks, is an ever-present risk.

Despite the inhospitable operating environment, Mehman Aliyev,
director of the Turan news agency, a regular government critic, holds
out hope that free speech will prevail. Azerbaijani citizens widely
use social media to share the views of those who think independently
from the government, he noted. A video of expatriate Azerbaijani
blogger Habib Muntazir shouting in Berlin at President Aliyev, calling
on the president to free political prisoners is one case in point.
“There will be new alternatives to emerge,” predicted Turan’s Aliyev.
Closing the country’s “information space” will “not be possible.”

While the Internet may indeed be untamable, that’s not stopping the
government from trying to harness it, according to independent
political analyst Zardusht Alizade. “There are lots of new websites
that have emerged and are mostly funded by the government itself to
fill in the information gap and manipulate public opinion,” Alizade
said. The government’s goal with these websites, he claimed, is to “to
manipulate information as was done during the Soviet era.”

Under the circumstances, Internet-borne rumors can sometimes gain the
currency of news. This trend is particularly noticeable concerning
developments on the frontline separating Azerbaijani and Armenian
forces, said Aynur Elgunesh, a journalist who is now at Meydan TV
after working for 17 years in Azerbaijani print media. Although a
ceasefire technically governs the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, Armenian
and Azerbaijani troops routinely engage in firefights along the
frontline.

“Rumors from the frontline have become, I’d say, more credible for
readers than [reports from] news media.” said Elgunesh.

Editor’s note:
Nargiz Rashid is a pseudonym for a freelance journalist who
specializes in covering Azerbaijan.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/71846

Analyst: It is the military-political balance rather than the Russia

Analyst: It is the military-political balance rather than the Russian
base that defends Armenia against Turkey
by David Stepanyan

Friday, January 30, 18:03

It is the military-political balance rather than the 102nd Russian
military base that defends Armenia against Turkey, political analyst
Saro Saroyan has told ArmInfo.

“It is accepted in Armenia and Russia to present Russians and the
102nd Russian military base as the only guarantor of Armenia’s
security. I think it is time to dispel that false stereotype. Turkey
cannot undertake any aggression against Armenian people, disregarding
the current military-political balance in the world. Such aggression
will inevitably break the global balance and will probably lead to
punishment of its initiator”, says the analyst.

Saroyan stressed that there are dozens of small states like Armenia,
which also repose on balance. So, under the current conditions, the
analyst thinks that Turkey may display aggression against Armenia only
if that aggression is sanctioned by NATO. This will become possible
only in case Yerevan suddenly spoils its relations with the West. But
no such a thing is observed, fortunately.

The analyst also points out the absolute lack of problems between
Turkey and Russia and the current problems between Turkey and the
West, particularly, the problems of Iraq, Syria, Kurds, and ISIS.
“Therefore, Turks cannot simply attack Armenia for no special reason
as much as they would like to do”, he says.
The 102nd Russian military base was officially deployed in Armenia in
1995 under an Armenian-Russian interstate agreement.

http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=3B28C750-A891-11E4-806D0EB7C0D21663

Amal Clooney, Renee Zellweger and the best responses to those endles

Amal Clooney, Renee Zellweger and the best responses to those endless,
anodyne questions about fashion and aestheticism

Great responses from women, at events to promote their jobs, to those
fashion and beauty queries that the men don’t seem to receive

JENN SELBY
Friday 30 January 2015

Amal Clooney happens to be married to an extremely famous man.

She also happens to be a woman.

As such, after being thrust in front of the media spotlight for said
relationship with said man, she now has her looks routinely
scrutinised while she casually carries on being one of the world’s top
human rights lawyers.

Her witty and withering response to one reporter’s question about her
fashion choices as she appeared in the European Court of Human Rights
(ECHR) in Strasbourg earlier this week was priceless.

`I’m wearing Ede & Ravenscroft,’ she said.

Feminist quotes from the icons to inspire you

She was there to represent Armenia in their case against DoÄ?u
Perinçek, the leader of the Turkish Workers’ Party. For a little
background, Perinçek was convicted of denying the 1915 Armenian
genocide in 2007 and Clooney is arguing on an appeal before the ECHR,
which ruled in favour of the man, Dogu Perincek, in December 2013.

Here are some more great responses from women, at events to promote
their jobs, to those endless, sexist questions about their aesthetics.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/amal-clooney-renee-zellweger-and-the-best-responses-to-those-endless-anodyne-questions-about-fashion-and-aestheticism-10014126.html

Armenia’s economy must be ready for any scenario, says premier

Armenia’s economy must be ready for any scenario, says premier

14:15 * 30.01.15

The globally observed economic war forces Armenia’s economy to be
ready to face any scenario, Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamyan said today
as he addressed the cabinet meeting.

“We have created a working group headed by [Vice Premier and Minister
of International Economic Integration and Reforms Vache] Gabrielyan,
and it includes representatives from all the interested ministries,”
he said, asking Mr Gabrielyan to elaborate on their activities.

Responding to the premier, the minister first stressed the need of
ensuring currency flows, considering it an important measure to
increase the economy’s resistance and to enhance the defense sector.

“In particular, there is a draft law on export promotion, which has
been sent to the National Assembly. Additionally, we have also
envisaged steps towards attracting other resources. So, from this
point of view, this measure is very important. It addresses
opportunities of bringing money from foreign markets,” he said, noting
that the domestic bonds’ turnover has a higher interest rate on the
secondary market.

Mr Gabrielyan said that they also have plans to attract investors in
infrastructure programs.

He added that the ministry also discussed procedures for regulating
the currency market, focusing particularly on a concept paper
addressing currency exchange units’ price policies and anti-trust
commissions’ possible reactions to price surges.

“These measures are especially important in terms of attracting
resources from investors,” the minister added.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2015/01/30/varchapet-vachegabrielyan/1574334

Small business owners demand to cancel revised law on sales tax

Small business owners demand to cancel revised law on sales tax

YEREVAN, January 30. / ARKA /. Several hundreds of Armenian small
vendors gathered again today outside the government building to
protest against the revised law on turnover tax that comes into force
from February 1.

The revised law has lowered the turnover tax for vendors with annual
sales of up to 58 million drams ($125,000) from 3.5 percent to 1
percent, but small business owners will have to provide tax
authorities with documentary evidence of their wholesale purchase
deals with larger firms or face heavy fines. The government argues the
change is meant to crack down on tax evasion by big business, but
vendors say they cannot comply with this requirement because their
suppliers usually refuse to provide them with receipts and invoices

Yesterday small business owners marched from the government building
to the presidential residence blocking for a brief time the main road
in downtown Yerevan. Police had to use force to unblock the road.
Today the protesters threatened to shift to ‘radical measures’ unless
their voice is heard by the government, saying they would file
applications en mass to suspend their activity demanding also a
meeting with prime minister Hovik Abrahamyan.

The prime minister Abrahamyan agreed to meet with 15 protesters, the
government press office reported. It quoted Abrahamyan as saying that
the government will not make any steps that run counter to the
interests of the society.

Representatives of small businesses were said to have suggested that
the revised law on sales tax become voluntary, that the minimum annual
sales ceiling be raised and that the number of inspections by tax
authorities be cut.

Before wrapping up the meeting the head of the government said all the
proposals would be discussed by the government and presented to the
society.

In a related development, deputy finance minister Vakhtang Mirumyan
said the ministry has reached a compromise with small business owners.
Speaking at a cabinet session he said small vendors will not have to
provide ‘detailed list of goods” and will have to indicate only
‘categories of goods.’ He said the ministry has developed a clear-cut
inventory procedure for this.

Mirumyan said concessions are provided for cases where traders
purchase goods directly from foreign suppliers, but bring them in by
forwarding companies and therefore can not provide invoices of
suppliers.
He said small business owners will be freed also from providing
documentary evidence for buying agricultural products for resale.

“In fact, we observe all our arrangements and we have no information
about new demands by small business owners,’ he said.-0-

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/small_business_owners_demand_to_cancel_revised_law_on_sales_tax/#sthash.xUaoqlFs.dpuf