Armenian Prosecutor General’s Petition Remains Unanswered

ARMENIAN PROSECUTOR GENERAL’S PETITION REMAINS UNANSWERED

15:03 * 05.02.15

Both on Wednesday and Thursday, a source at the PR Department of the
Russian Prosecutor’s Office could not answer a question about whether
Russia’s law-enforcers discussed Armenian Prosecutor General Gevorg
Kostanyan’s petition for the transfer of the Avetisyan family murder
case to Armenia’s law-enforcers.

Asked about possible developments, the source said that a relevant
inquiry was sent to the International Cooperation of the Prosecutor
General’s Office of Russia, but no answer has so far been received.

Armenia’s Prosecutor General applied to his Russian counterpart
Yuri Chaika for a transfer of the Avetisyan family murder case to
Armenia’s law-enforcers.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2015/02/05/chayka/1580555

Armenian American Artist Raises Awareness Of Genocide Through Film

ARMENIAN AMERICAN ARTIST RAISES AWARENESS OF GENOCIDE THROUGH FILM

10:32, 05 Feb 2015
Siranush Ghazanchyan

Nazo Bravo is set to release documentary, soundtrack and feature film
commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide

Nazo Bravo, an Armenian American actor and hip hop artist from Los
Angeles, is currently in production on multiple projects dedicated to
the Armenian Genocide and culture as a whole, including a documentary
titled “Armenian American,”Asbarez reports.

In 2014, Nazo visited Armenia for the first time and felt the
importance of documenting the journey of his family’s heritage and
homeland. Nazo states, “It’s a crucial time for my people. April 24th
marks the centennial of the genocide, which Turkey still denies, so
I’m doing what I can to help bring awareness to the issue. I feel
like this documentary is something any first or second generation
American can relate to, no matter where you come from.”

Nazo will premiere the documentary as an episodic web-series on Feb.

11 via his YouTube channel, and will release a song from each week’s
episode via his Soundcloud. The series will conclude with a music video
filmed entirely in Armenia titled “Power of The Hye” (“Hye” translates
to “Armenian”), where Nazo touches on President Obama’s position on
the Armenian Genocide and Hrant Dink, an Armenian journalist who was
assassinated in Turkey in 2007 for speaking out about the issue.

Nazo is also currently working on the feature film “Armenia, My
Country, My Mother, My Love,” a period drama set in 1915 based on
stories from survivors of the Genocide. Nazo plays the role of Grigor
Orbelian, an Armenian intellectual called to Constantinople by Turkey
during World War I on the eve of the Armenian Genocide. Historically,
the rounding up and deportation of Armenian intellectuals (sometimes
known as Red Sunday) marks the first phase of the genocide. The
story then follows Grigor’s family as they face the treacherous death
marches carried out by Turkish soldiers leading hundreds of thousands
of defenseless Armenian women, children, and elderly to their deaths.

The film is scheduled for release in theaters this April.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2015/02/05/armenian-american-artist-raises-awareness-of-genocide-through-film/

ANKARA: In The Footsteps Of The Murders Of Hrant Dink And Nihat Kaza

IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF THE MURDERS OF HRANT DINK AND NIHAT KAZANHAN

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Feb 4 2015

EMRE USLU
February 04, 2015, Wednesday

The murder of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, the killing
of the priest Andrea Santoro and the massacre of missionaries at
the Zirve Publishing House in Malatya are the most famous of the
unresolved murders that have been committed during the Justice and
Development Party’s (AKP) rule. Only the hired killers who committed
the murders were caught, and the people who masterminded the attacks
could not be found.

Dink’s murder was very dramatic. Hired killers are still being actively
used. Many years after the murder the killer contacted the prosecutor’s
office and gave information on several police officers whom he claimed
“had a hand in the murder.” Some police officers were arrested, but
there was something those behind the murder had not calculated. They
had promoted the person who was the head of the intelligence branch at
the Trabzon security directorate at the time of murder and assigned
him as the head of the National Police Department’s Intelligence
Unit. They had appointed his assistant as a “reliable” man to Cizre,
the center of recent skirmishes.

As the investigation led to the head of the Intelligence Unit, they
stalled the investigation once again. They tried to save face with
campaigns to manipulate the public’s perceptions on the matter.

Let us proceed with the correct analysis of what happened. After
an investigation was launched into Ergenekon — a clandestine
organization nested within the state trying to overthrow or manipulate
the democratically elected government — unresolved murders came to
an abrupt halt in Turkey. The defendants in the Ergenekon case were
released from prison and the murders resumed. The recent incidents
of tension in Cizre can hardly be seen as mere coincidence.

I wouldn’t have noticed this if one of my sources hadn’t drawn
attention to the interesting link between Dink’s murder and the
Cizre incidents.

A number of books note that Veli Kucuk, who was accused of being the
head of the Ergenekon organization, had conducted certain activities in
Trabzon in the run up to Dink’s murder. Two critical people in Trabzon
were mentioned as being involved in the preparations for the murder:
Trabzon gendarmerie commander Col. Ali Oz and Ercan Demir from the
Trabzon Police Department’s Intelligence Unit.

Much was written about Oz. My source draws attention to the interesting
ties held by Police Chief Demir, who was arrested in connection with
Dink’s murder.

My source claims that Demir had contacted Kucuk on the phone 26 times
before Dink’s murder.

My source further argues that at the time, Demir had prevented
his staff from gathering intelligence in the gendarmerie’s area,
particularly in the town of Pelitli, where Ogun Samast, the hitman
in the Dink murder, lived.

It is claimed that while Yasin Hayal, who was eventually convicted of
Dink’s murder, was being pursued by the police and went to Pelitli,
Demir told his team not to pursue him, citing previous problems with
the gendarmerie over jurisdiction.

My source also explains that Demir has close relations with Oz at
that time. This piece of information was also verified by one of my
sources from the military, who worked in Trabzon in the past.

For my source, it is not a coincidence that tensions in Cizre
skyrocketed after Demir was appointed to a position in Cizre. Of
course, he also does not believe that it is a coincidence that the
timing of the release of the Ergenekon defendants and the start of
incidents in Cizre coincide.

After Demir was assigned to Cizre, there was a sharp rise in mass
demonstrations. We all observed what happened this year in Cizre when
a 12-year-old boy, Nihat Kazanhan, was shot dead on Jan. 14.

Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) deputy Altan Tan was the first
politician who argued that incidents in the district skyrocketed
after Demir was appointed.

Of course the court will investigate if there was a link between Kucuk
and Demir. It is the duty of the court to find out if this link had
something to do with the murder.

But I don’t think it is a coincidence that the incidents halted
abruptly when the Ergenekon defendants were jailed in 2007, but resumed
after they were released from prison; and that children were being
killed by the police and the prime minister and interior minister
try to conceal this fact.

Given the rumors that Ergenekon had made a deal with the government,
I believe these incidents are expected.

My source is of the same opinion. “Ergenekon has become extremely
successful with the minor efforts it exerted in previous governments’
terms and it has secured its former position in the state thanks
to the agreement it made with the ruling party. Our country is in a
difficult position compared to the past, and we now face the risk of
division of our territory.”

Previously, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) had chosen Yuksekova
as its pilot area. Now, it has picked Cizre as a more suitable place
for Serhildan (rebellion in Kurdish). Is it a coincidence that Demir
was appointed to Cizre? Perhaps Demir has nothing to do with these
incidents, but others may be laying a trap for him. The court must
investigate it…

http://www.todayszaman.com/columnist/emre-uslu/in-the-footsteps-of-the-murders-of-hrant-dink-and-nihat-kazanhan_371769.html

The Destruction Of Syria’s Cultural Heritage

THE DESTRUCTION OF SYRIA’S CULTURAL HERITAGE

Counter Punch
Feb 4 2015

by EVA BARTLETT

Much has been written about the destruction and looting of Syria’s
heritage sites. Syria’s Directorate-General of Antiquities & Museums
(DGAM), as well as UNESCO have documented the vast damage and looting
as extensively as possible in this time of proxy-war-manufactured
crisis. In July 2014, the DGAM issued a statement and plea regarding
the critical situation of Syria’s heritage under attack.

“A year has passed since we last sent an international call out to
all those concerned with defending Syria’s heritage. At the time, we
warned against a possible cultural disaster that might be inflicted on
an invaluable part of the human heritage existing in Syria,” the DGAM
statement read. It noted, “Much of what we had feared happened… vast
regions extending along the geography of Syria are now classified as
‘distressed cultural areas’ due to the exacerbation of the clandestine
excavation crimes and deliberate damage to our historic monuments
and cultural landmarks in those regions…”

As for UNESCO, it noted, “Syria’s exceptional archaeological, urban
and architectural heritage has been considerably damaged during the
conflict, and has affected all six World Heritage Sites in Syria and
eleven sites inscribed on UNESCO’s Tentative List.”

The six UNESCO-recognized sites are: The Ancient City of Damascus;
Palmyra; The Ancient City of Aleppo; Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at
Salah al-Din; and The Ancient villages of Northern Syria, many of
which have suffered intense digging and looting, as well as various
acts of intentional destruction.

Yet, in spite of DGAM warnings and UNESCO confirmations, as we
near the start of year five of the war on sovereign Syria, the
Axis-of-Interventionalists continue to arm terrorists within Syria,
and train and funnel still more terrorists into Syria — terrorists
who are not only murdering Syrians and Palestinians, but destroying
Syria’s heritage, as they have been doing since the beginning.

The “moderate” heritage-wreckers

Over the years, many corporate news pieces either outright blame
the Syrian government and Syrian Army (SAA), or pin the blame almost
solely on Da’ish (ISIS/ISIL/IS), obfuscating and/or justifying the
crimes of the other militia factions who have plundered and destroyed
Syrian heritage for the last four years.

Reports noting the thievings of the so-called “moderates” often
follow with claims that it is out of deparate want of funding that
they pillage. One such piece, a September 2012 Time Magazine article,
both inserts the standard MSM talking points about an “uprising,” a
“civil war,” etc. and also notably promotes the line of cash-strapped
“rebels” giving into necessity and looting the country to fund a
“revolution” against a “dictator.” Time Magazine inserts a sectarian
flourish at the end, “Still, says the Sunni Muslim, who has committed
to helping his co-religionists across the border, ‘sometimes you have
to make a sacrifice. How else will we overthrow Bashar?'”

As with numerous other reports, conveniently overlooked is the
amply-documented role of the NATO-Gulf-Zionist-Turkey alliance
arming (and training and enabling the transit of) terrorists, from
the so-called “FSA” to the Nusra Front to the Islamic Front to
Da’ish themselves, including by air-dropping weapons on more than
one occasion.

Rick Sterling’s “U.S. Alliance with FSA and ISIL in Six Photographs”
notes the US alliance with Da’ish. In just six photos, the link
between so-called “moderate rebel” leader ‘Abd al-Jabbar al-Okaidi and
Da’ish and US politicians, is clear. The fourth photo, a still from
a November 2013 video interview with al-Okaidi, quotes the “moderate”
terrorist saying, “My relationship with the brothers of ISIL is good.”

The US politicians include Former US Ambassador to Syria and
Coordinator of the “Friends of Syria”, Robert Ford — shown in
May 2013 with al-Okaidi — and US Congress members–including the
repeatedly-illegally-sneaking-into-Syria, John McCain — shown meeting
with al-Okaidi. [see also “Who is Ambassador Robert Stephen Ford? The
Architect of US Sponsored Terrorism in Syria” and “Washington Admits:
FSA Equals Fictitious Syrian Army” and “FSA Leader Defects to ISIL
and Exposes FSA as a Saudi-Israeli Run Project”].

Maram Susli’s (the “Syrian Girl”) December 27, 2014 article in the
New Eastern Outlook, “US Armed Rebels Gave TOW missiles to al-Qaeda,”
notes, “US supplied TOW anti-tank missiles have ended up in the hands
of Jabhat al-Nusra, Syria’s branch of al-Qaeda. The US provided the
missiles to CIA-vetted Syrian rebel faction Harakat al-Hazm in May. A
video posted by al-Nusra shows the weapons being used to take over
Syrian military bases, Wadi Deif and Hamidiyeh in Idlib province…

Currently Harakat al-Hazm is united with Jabhat al-Nusra, in Handarat
Aleppo, and are jointly fighting the Syrian Army. The militant
employing the TOW missile in the video, shows clear proficiency in its
use, indicating that he has directly or indirectly benefited from US
training. In spite of this revelation, there is evidence to suggest
the US is still arming the FSA with TOW missiles.”

The article goes on to explain these new revelations are only the
latest in years of documented alliances between Western-sponsored
“moderates” and Da’ish. “In 2012 the Free Syrian Army (FSA),
referred to as the ‘moderate rebels’ by the US State Department,
fought alongside ‘Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham’ (ISIS) in Aleppo
against the Syrian military for control over Menagh Airbase. The FSA
head of Aleppo Military Council ‘Abd al-Jabbar al-Oqaidi, who has met
with US Ambassador Robert Ford, was filmed with ISIS Amir Abu Jandal
praising ISIS for helping take the base using a suicide car bomb. As
late as September 2014, FSA commander Bassel Idriss said that they
had joined forces with ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra in Qalamoun Mountain.”

Anthony Cartalucci’s November 28, 2014 artilce, “Germany’s DW Reports
ISIS Supply Lines Originate in NATO’s Turkey,” further exposes Turkey’s
blatant role in supplying arms to terrorists in Syria.

“Germany’s international broadcaster Deutsche Welle (DW) published a
video report of immense implications — possibly the first national
broadcaster in the West to admit that the so-called “Islamic State”
(ISIS) is supplied not by “black market oil” or “hostage ransoms”
but billions of dollars worth of supplies carried into Syria across
NATO member Turkey’s borders via hundreds of trucks a day. The report
titled, “‘IS’ supply channels through Turkey,” confirms what has been
reported by geopolitical analysts since at least as early as 2011:
that NATO member Turkey has allowed a torrent in supplies, fighters,
and weapons to cross its borders unopposed to resupply ISIS positions
inside of Syria.”

Before she was killed in a highly-suspect car crash (days after
stating the Turkish intelligence had threatened her), journalist Serena
Shim had reported on World Food Organization trucks ferrying Da’ish
terrorists via Turkey into Syria. With the clearly-documented ties
between the US (and its Axis-of-Destruction allies) and the numerous
terrorist groups destroying Syria, the hollow concern that US figures
and media sometimes voice is blatantly hypocritical.

In September 2014, the US Department of State urged “all parties in
Iraq, Syria, and the international community to respect and protect
archaeological, historic, religious, and cultural sites, including
museums and archives. All those who destroy important cultural property
must be held accountable.” American Secretary of State John Kerry
topped this hypocrisy with his statement at a white-washing event
in New York City, “Threats to Cultural Heritage in Iraq and Syria,”
in September, 2014 that, “…no one group has done more to put our
shared cultural heritage in the gun sights than ISIL. How shocking and
historically shameful it would be if we did nothing while the forces
of chaos rob the very cradle of our civilization. We are determined
instead to help Iraqis and Syrians protect and preserve their heritage
in peace.”

The sting of these hypocritical words is that Syrian patriots
are trying to protect their heritage (in many cases give their
lives while doing so), and that Da’ish’s recruiters, trainers, and
enablers continue to supply weapons and open borders while crying
crocodile tears over Syria’s destroyed and pillaged heritage. Had
the Western-Zionist-Gulf alliance not cooked up this plan to attempt
to destroy Syria, Syria’s heritage would not be in peril — period
(see Seymour Hersh’s 2007 investigative report, “The Redirection”
in The New Yorker).

In January, 2015, the US Defense Department said that “as many as 1,000
American troops and trainers would be sent to Turkey, Saudi Arabia and
Qatar to assist in the training of Syrian opposition groups,” Sputnik
News reported. According to the same report, crocodile-tears Kerry
stated that in addition to so-called “moderate” Syrian rebels, “other
nationals will also undergo special training to join the coalition
in their fight against IS militants.” You can bet the newest batch
of terrorists will be just as respectful of Syria’s heritage as all
the terrorists before them.

Gleefully destroying the cradle of civilization

When terrorists — no, not Da’ish, but al-Nusra and the so-called
“FSA” — terrorized the ancient village of Ma’loula for eight months,
they meted out considerable destruction and damage on this heritage
site, as well as looted and burned the town’s monasteries and historic
buildings. They burned the shrine containing the remains of St.

Thekla, stole her bones. They vandalized icons and frescoes in the
church in the Convent of St. Thekla, and burned parts of the church
itself. They shelled and looted icons from the Monastery of Sts.

Sergius and Bacchus (see video report, “Syrian historical treasures
and archeological artifacts destroyed or stolen by terrorist gangs”).

In Homs, it was likewise not Da’ish but al-Nusra and the so-called
“FSA” who not only stole the food and valuables of residents in the Old
City, but also vandalized, blew up, and set afire historic buildings,
like the torched Church of Um al-Zenar (St. Mary’s Church), “built
upon an ancient crypt cave with signs of Christian worship dating
back to 59ce.”

In both cases, it was the SAA, local volunteers in the National Defense
Forces (NDF) and empowered residents who struggled to preserve and
minimize damage to their heritage sites. And in both cases, once
under control of the SAA and government, plans for restorations were
immediately started.

Damascus, which UNESCO describes as “founded in the 3rd millennium BCE,
…one of the oldest cities in the Middle East,” has also suffered
damage to its heritage sites. Terrorists’ car bombs and mortars, which
have terrorized residents of the city, have also hit historic places.

The 11th-century Citadel, the 8th-century Umayyad Masjid, the
13th-century Great Madrasah, al-Adliya, the Greek Orthodox Church of
Antioch in Bab Touma, and the Armenian Orthodox Church in Bab Sharqi,
have all suffered, according to UNESCO’s report. But some of the worst
destruction and damage to cultural heritage thus far documented is in
Aleppo, which UNESCO describes as “one of the (if not the) oldest,
continuously occupied cities in the world with some 7,000 years of
known settlement history.”

The Aleppo section of UNESCO’s latest “Damage Assessment Overview”
is lengthy. Some of the assessment includes:

* “At least 121 historical buildings have been damaged or destroyed —
equal to 30-40% of the World Heritage property area — in addition
to the destruction of more than 1,500 shops of the Suq.

* “The 11th century Minaret, the prayer hall, and the main gate of
the Omayyad Masjid have been destroyed. The masjid’s courtyard and
all of its decorative elements have also suffered severe damage,
as did the surrounding neighbourhood.

* “The wooden minbar has been dismantled and transferred to an
unknown location.

* “Damage to the gates of the city wall has occurred… to some of
the most important Islamic architecture buildings… and to most
historic houses of the Jdeideh quarter…

* “The Waqifiyya Library has been damaged due to a fire.”

YouTube videos and online images showed terrorists from the Islamic
Front (Robert Ford’s “moderates”) gleefully exploding the 150-year-old
Carlton Citadel Hotel in Aleppo’s Old City in May 2014, the destruction
and damage extending to the 13th-century Citadel facing the hotel. A
report in the Independent cited the Islamic Front’s Twitter account
as claiming responsibility for destroying the Carlton.

A video posted online shows the takfiris in a tunnel beneath the Old
City, repeatedly stating their intent to blow up the hotel. Clearly,
with over 23 tons of explosives, these Western-sponsored terrorists
knew the detonation would mean extensive destruction to Aleppo’s
historic sites surrounding the hotel.

Yet, the corporate media noted the destruction with little-to-no
condemnation. The Los Angeles Times reported blithely, “The explosion
ripped through the Carlton Citadel Hotel, near the landmark medieval
Citadel and Aleppo’s walled Old City, both deemed United Nations
World Heritage sites,” carefully choosing their words to abstain from
condemnation of the terrorist act. The Los Angeles Times additionally
took the opportunity to plug the so-called “revolution,” “‘The attack
came as a way to raise the morale of the people after the deal that
happened yesterday,’ said the pro-opposition activist…” Other
headlines justified, rather than condemned, the calculated
destruction. Reuters reported, “Syrian rebels blow up Aleppo hotel
used by army.” The Guardian said, “Syria rebels blow up Aleppo hotel
used as barracks by government forces.”

Conversely, the DGAM stated, “This criminal act is part of a series
of similar acts targeting historic and unique buildings and landmarks
in Aleppo, such as the incidents of the Police Headquarters and the
Justice Court… This targeting has resulted in great loss in the
components of Syria’s archaeological heritage, which can be added to
a long list of painful losses that cannot be replaced.”

In early December, Islamic Front militants bombed a historic masjid
in Aleppo’s Old City. Al-Masdar News noted, “The militants from the
Islamic Front (Jabhat al-Islamiyah) bombarded multiple historical
sites in the Old City of Aleppo this weekend, destroying residential
buildings and the 900-year old al-Sultaniyah Masjid. According
to a military source in Aleppo, the Islamic Front has destroyed
numerous sites in the Old City, including the outer walls of the
Aleppo Citadel.” Video footage shows terrorists bombing the Citadel
area at the end of November.

On December 30, the DGAM reported further tunnel explosions in the
Old City near the Citadel. “The Armed groups have detonated bombs in
tunnels under the Aleppo old city, the bombs were reportedly placed in
two tunnels running under historic parts of the city. The explosions
caused severe damage to the market and the historical buildings in
the area…” Other examples of the terrorists’ deliberate destruction
of Syrian heritage include:

March, 2013: al-Nusra terrorists destroyed a Muslim shrine in Raqqa.

PressTV reported, “Videos posted online show foreign-backed militants
blew up the tomb of ‘Ammar ibn Yasir, who was one of the companions
of Islam’s Prophet Mohammad (pbuh)… Anti-government militants have
attacked and destroyed several holy sites, including Shia mosques,
since the beginning of unrest in Syria.”

May 2, 2013: Syria News reported, “[Terrorists] destroyed one more
grave in Syria, the Prophet’s (pbuh) companion Hijr ibn ‘Adi al-Kindi
in Adra, Damascus Countryside. They took out his dead body, he died
some 1,400 years ago and buried it in an unmarked place…”

November, 2014: The Independent reported that al-Nusra blew up an
Armenian church in Deir al-Zor dating to 1846. “All of the church
archives, dating back to 1841 and containing thousands of documents
on the Armenian Holocaust, were burned to ashes, while the bones of
hundreds of genocide victims, packed into the church’s crypt in memory
of the mass killings 99 years ago, were thrown into the street beside
the ruins,” the report noted.

January 8, 2015: Business Insider reported that al-Nusra blew up a
13th-century tomb near the Jordanian border.

January 17, 2015: DGAM reported that terrorists destroyed “the shrine
of Shaykh Muhammad Nabhan in The Kiltawiye Masjid at Bab al-Hadid,
the historical gates of the Ancient City of Aleppo, despite the
appeals from residents and dignitaries of the region.”

Eva Bartlett is a Canadian freelance journalist and activist who has
lived in and written from the Gaza Strip, Syria, and Lebanon.

This essay originally ran in The Crescent.

http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/04/the-destruction-of-syrias-cultural-heritage/

Croatia Vs Serbia: Genocide The Hardest To Prove

CROATIA VS SERBIA: GENOCIDE THE HARDEST TO PROVE

Agence France Presse
February 3, 2015 Tuesday 1:34 AM GMT

The Hague, Feb 3 2015

Genocide, of which Croatia and Serbia have accused each other
before the UN’s highest court, is the gravest crime in international
humanitarian law — and also the most difficult to prove.

The International Court of Justice will hand down its judgement in
The Hague on Tuesday in a long-running case between the two former
foes for acts committed during the bitter civil wars that followed
the break-up of the former Yugoslavia in 1991.

Derived from the Greek word “genos”, for race or tribe, and the suffix
“cide” from the Latin for “to kill”; genocide is defined by the United
Nations as an “act committed with intent to destroy in whole or in
part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.”

The word was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew who took
refuge in the United States, to describe crimes committed by Nazi
Germany during the Holocaust.

It was used for the first time within a legal framework by an
international military tribunal at Nuremberg to try Nazi leaders for
their crimes in 1945. Those accused were however convicted of crimes
against humanity.

Genocide has been recognised within international law since 1948,
with the advent of the UN Convention, and lists murder among a series
of crimes.

The UN in 1985 recognised the 1915 killing of hundreds of thousands
of Armenians as genocide.

In 1994, the Rwandan genocide in which the UN said some 800,000
Tutsis and moderate Hutus were murdered, led to the creation of the
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, based in Arusha, Tanzania.

It has been handing out convictions since 1998 for the crime of
genocide and complicity.

The massacre of almost 8,000 Muslim men and boys by Bosnian Serb forces
at Srebrenica in July 1995 during the Bosnian war, was recognised as
genocide by the ICJ in 2007.

The Balkans war crimes court, the International Criminal Tribunal
for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), has convicted several accused
of genocide.

Two former leaders of Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge regime from 1975-79
were handed life sentences in Phnom Penh for crimes against humanity
last August and their genocide trial before a UN-sponsored tribunal
continues.

Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is wanted by the International
Criminal Court (ICC) on an arrest warrant for genocide related to
crimes committed against Darfur’s civilian population.

Since its inception in 2002, the Hague-based ICC is the only permanent
independent international court able to try the perpetrators of
genocide on all continents.

How Foreign Governments Can Influence American Media – And Tried To

HOW FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS CAN INFLUENCE AMERICAN MEDIA – AND TRIED TO BLOCK MY DOCUMENTARY

The Conversation
Jan 30 2015

Ted Bogosian, Instructor and Visiting Filmmaker at Duke University

Feature films and television shows notoriously play fast-and-loose
with the facts. When prologues proclaim “Based on a True Story,”
they’re gracefully implying that what follows is mostly fiction.

Awards shows and moviegoers seem to have few problems distinguishing
narrative films from documentaries – and assign different editorial
standards accordingly. Case in point: last year’s box office behemoth
Gravity was rife with scientific inaccuracies, large and small –
and took home seven Academy Awards.

Foreign governments are another story. No matter if films are purported
to be fact or fiction, governments care how their countries are
being portrayed. And though some may think of the media as immune
to foreign influence, history – along with my personal experience –
tell a different story.

Foreign PR campaigns have been waged for decades

Last month, North Korea conducted a now-infamous cyberterrorism
campaign against Sony Pictures in an attempt to block the company
from releasing The Interview.

North Korea may have lost the war, but they did win one censorship
battle: before Sony distributed the film overseas, its rattled
producers decided to tone down the gore in Kim Jung Un’s death scene.

Showtime’s Homeland has come under fire from the Pakistani government.

blur95/Flickr, CC BY

And Pakistan recently complained about the Showtime series Homeland
for portraying its country as “a grimy hellhole and war zone where
shootouts and bombs go off with dead bodies scattered around.”

“Nothing is further from the truth,” a Pakistan embassy spokesman said.

If Pakistan looks like a much more welcoming place on Homeland next
season, maybe their not-so-quiet diplomacy will have fostered subtle
censorship.

In fact, American media outlets have feel external editorial pressures
for decades. Whether it was Hollywood executives running scripts by
Nazi officials for approval in the 1930s, or studios inserting subtle,
pro-China messages into their films to cull favor with China’s
notoriously strict censors, foreign countries have long exerted
influence on the final products emerging from America’s television
and film studios.

And studios have ample reasons to capitulate. From overseas box
office receipts to retaining access to foreign filming locations,
it doesn’t hurt to be on the good side of a foreign regime.

Hired from within?

But unless more emails of diplomats and media executives are hacked and
published, we can only guess how frequently these events are unfolding
among insiders. What many don’t know is that American lobbyists also
play a part in the process – and work as paid mouthpieces for foreign
governments. Aside from an act of cyberterrorism or a diplomatic
complaint, if a foreign country wants to lawfully — and effectively –
influence the editorial direction of American news and entertainment,
it hires a Registered Foreign Agent.

Registered Foreign Agents are individuals and organizations paid by
a foreign government or business for lobbying, public relations and
advocacy within the United States. The Foreign Agents Registration
Act (FARA) was passed in 1938 to levy criminal penalties against Nazi
propagandists from unduly influencing the US political process. The law
forces strict reporting requirements on every means of communications
and every meeting.

Some lobbyists choose to break the law rather than do the paperwork.

But those who violate the FARA regulations have to pay hefty fines
and risk up to five years in prison. The Justice Department also can
seek an injunction that would bar violators from acting as a foreign
agent for a certain amount of time.

Today, thousands of Registered Foreign Agents collect – and spend –
many millions of dollars each year to make sure that their foreign
clients’ interests are represented in the corridors of Capitol Hill.

Joseph Califano, Jr., Turkey, and my documentary film

Joseph Califano, Jr. has been in the news recently. In an op-ed penned
for the Washington Post, the former adviser to President Lyndon B.

Johnson declared the film Selma unfit for awards consideration.

“Contrary to the portrait painted by Selma,” Califano wrote, “Lyndon
Johnson and Martin Luther King Jr. were partners in this effort.

Johnson was enthusiastic about voting rights and the president urged
King to find a place like Selma and lead a major demonstration… The
movie should be ruled out this Christmas and during the ensuing
awards season.”

As an expert witness, Califano effectively exercised his right to
discredit a fiction film for its supposed historical inaccuracies. But
how, then, does he contend with the fact that he was paid by a foreign
country to lobby for the censorship of my 1988 documentary film, which
sought to unearth historical truths related to events surrounding
the Armenian Genocide?

Author Ted Bogosian’s 1988 documentary An Armenian Journey.

In 1988, according to his “Short-Form Registration Statement Under
the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended,” Joseph A.

Califano, Jr. served as Registered Foreign Agent No. 3759.

Califano listed his business address as his prestigious Washington,
D.C. law firm, Dewey Ballentine, and his occupation as “Attorney.”

Asked to “describe in detail the services you have rendered” on behalf
of the “foreign principal” (The Embassy of the Republic of Turkey)
that “made it necessary to you file this form,” Califano entered

Representation involves the application of Section 396(g)(1)(A)
of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 to the broadcast of the film
“An Armenian Journey.”

In April 1988, PBS scheduled a nationwide, primetime broadcast of
the WGBH-Boston presentation An Armenian Journey. This hour-long
documentary – which I wrote, directed and produced – would focus on
a historical event that remains controversial 100 years later:

A bitter debate has raged over the deaths of more than a million
Armenians in Eastern Turkey during World War I. Were they simply
casualties of war, or the victims of a calculated effort by Turkish
officials to exterminate the Armenian people?

The press kit describes the film as “a personal quest for the truth” by
“an American journalist of Armenian descent” to reconcile “stories of
the atrocities committed against our people by the Ottoman Turks…with
Turkish government denials.”

Califano and several other Registered Foreign Agents working for the
Republic of Turkey, including the late Frank Mankiewicz, organized a
strong effort to dissuade PBS from broadcasting the film, according
to the New York Times.

Frank Mankiewicz, the vice chairman of Hill & Knowlton, the public
relations firm that is representing the Turkish Government, said
that the [Turkish] Embassy and an umbrella group called the Assembly
of Turkish American Associations were considering such actions as
picketing and a lawsuit.

Joseph Califano, Jr. – whom Turkey paid $122,334.37 – sought to block
the author’s film from being broadcast on PBS. LBJ Foundation/Flickr,
CC BY

Unlike Sony’s response to North Korea’s cyber attack, PBS, WGBH
and hundreds of other local public television stations resisted this
attempt by Turkey and its Registered Foreign Agents to censor a motion
picture presentation inside the United States.

The Times continued: “PBS said there was nothing wrong with the
film, as did WGBH, the public television station in Boston that was
co-producer. Letters have gone back and forth, one side enumerating
alleged flaws, the other refuting, and the accusers refuting the
refutations.”

An Armenian Journey was broadcast as scheduled around the day of the
annual Armenian Genocide commemoration, April 24. Nielsen ratings
indicated that more than two million US households tuned in to the
broadcast that week.

TV Guide touted the program as “fascinating viewing.”

For his unsuccessful efforts to block the broadcast, Califano reported
under FARA that his compensation was $122,334.37. In fact, his private,
personal attempt at censorship earned Joseph Califano, Jr.

more money than I did. His fellow Registered Foreign Agents were also
well compensated, according to FARA records.

Thankfully, all of us were able to compete freely in the marketplace
of ideas, but the events in France this month prove how perilous
editorial disputes can be. Je Suis Charlie.

I have yet to meet Califano, but if I ever do I will thank him for
filing his FARA paperwork so thoroughly, even though it was his
legal obligation. Otherwise, the American public would be much less
informed about how foreign censorship is waged against the media
elite and producers.

Fortunately for myself and the makers of Selma, Califano and others
like him were unable to steer audiences away from our efforts to
present well-made films with high standards of journalism and craft
that offer alternative points of view.

Months from now, the Registered Foreign Agents of North Korea and
Pakistan will file their FARA paperwork. Anyone who wants to uncover
the roster of Americans who profited from the attempts of these
countries to censor the theatrical release of The Interview or the
transmission of Homeland can do their patriotic duty: follow the
money trail that leads to censorship by visiting

https://theconversation.com/how-foreign-governments-can-influence-american-media-and-tried-to-block-my-documentary-35996
www.fara.gov.

Stepanakert Explained Reason Of Clampdown

STEPANAKERT EXPLAINED REASON OF CLAMPDOWN

Hakob Badalyan, Political Commentator
Comments – 04 February 2015, 20:15

The Artsakh Deputy Prime Minister Arthur Aghabekyan commented on
the January 31 incident and the preceding developments. There are
interesting nuances between the lines of his comments which help
figure out the picture and motives of the NKR government’s clampdown
on the car march of the Founding Parliament.

After the incident the society is trying to understand the reason of
such cruel and tough, disproportionate and obviously demonstrative
use of force of the government of Artsakh.

What Arthur Aghabekyan conveys between the lines helps shed a light
on the possible reason or reasons.

Aghabekyan has announced that the Artsakh president, chief of police,
deputy prime minister, prosecutor general, head of the National
Security Service, the minister and deputy minister of defense who is
also the head of the Union of Veterans have done everything they could
to have the march cancelled, explaining it by a sensitive situation
for Artakh, challenges at the border etc.

In fact, the deputy prime minister of Artsakh points to the involvement
of the entire elite. It is difficult to imagine that there was a need
to involve the entire elite in the so-called negotiations to prevent
the car march. This indicates that the problem was given a broader
importance, more exactly, in the context of the government of Artsakh.

Evidence to this is the December meeting of President Bako Sahakyan
and all the listed officials with Zhirair Sefilyan and two others to
dissuade them from organizing the march to Artsakh.

Arthur Aghabekyan says the atmosphere seemed good, and they seemed
to have reached an agreement but they were surprised when the new
day of the march was announced after January. Aghabekyan says they
again set to prevent the march.

During January there were other developments. The most important
of them was the announcement of several members of the ARF Artsakh
Committee to leave the party and share the ideas and programs of the
Founding Parliament. When this fact is juxtaposed with the upcoming
parliamentary election in Artsakh, which is a key event ahead of the
end of Bako Sahakyan’s presidency, the reason of involvement of the
entire elite of the government of Artsakh in the prevention of the
march becomes clear.

Most probably, the march and the statement of the ARF Artsakh
committee have caused concerns in the elite in terms of control
over the process of forming government, which led to a decision to
use force after a futile “negotiation” process. The key issue was
the issue of government, not stability in Artsakh because the march
itself did not and could not threaten this stability.

The possible participation in forming government was seen as a threat,
especially in the context of political statements heard in Artsakh
prior to the march.

In fact, not the march was prevented but, as the clampdown decision
makers think, influence on the process of forming government was
prevented. The problem is not how substantial their concerns or fears
were. The problem is that there was fear, and this fear led to the
decision on clampdown because force is the first and last haven of
the ruling system in Armenia and Artsakh to keep power, and all the
rest is intermediate.

The problem is more urgent to the elite in Artsakh because Bako
Sahakyan is a leaving president. Perhaps this is the reason why the
prevention of the car march became a primary issue for Artsakh, in
other words, all the participants of the government viewed it through
the prism of their personal security and risks to their offices,
viewing force as the most reliable guarantee by far.

“Zhiro, I can’t let that action happen,” Arthur Aghabekyan quotes
Baku Sahakyan’s words of his December meeting.

Bako Sahakyan is a leaving president, and he has commitments to the
ruling elite which he must implement in full. He is leaving while
the others must stay, therefore their requirements to Sahakyan are
intensifying, and at their core is the guarantee of the closed joint
stock nature of government.

In addition, it is not ruled out that the demonstration of force is
the message of Artsakh to all the possible Yerevan-based subjects who
have aspirations to power in Artsakh, official Yerevan as well. It
is a message that in the process of forming government in Artsakh,
in case of any scenario, it will be necessary to take into account
everyone who has been involved in the prevention of the march.

In addition, it should be noted that the problem is not the
justification of concerns of the government of Artsakh, especially with
regard to a specific subject, but the general moods and disposition
ahead of an important stage of forming government.

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/33587#sthash.giB4qS4j.dpuf

Reservoirs Can Be Half Empty Not Because Of Weather But SHPPs: Speci

RESERVOIRS CAN BE HALF EMPTY NOT BECAUSE OF WEATHER BUT SHPPS: SPECIALISTS

14:56 February 03, 2015

Tert.am

At the press conference held several days ago Deputy Director of MES
Meteorological Center Gagik Surenyan said this winter was the warmest
after the winter in 1966. Under him, the thickest snow cover is in
Ashotsq – 52 cm, when the snow cover in the country usually makes up
90 cm. He also advised that February will also be a warm month.

Hrach Berberyan, Chairman of “Agrarian and Rural Union” NGO, also
thinks that the situation is very worrying, as the precipitation is
low, but he thinks it’s too early to worry.

Anyway, he claimed that the Government shall pay attention to this
problem, and not to present the lack of water as cause, but to solve
“problems with SHPPs on each river and brooklet”, which cause the
reservoirs to be half empty.

Environmentalist Inga Zarayan claims it’s too early to speak about lack
of water. “Certainly there are worrying signals, but the situation will
get clearer in February and March. The main problem we experience is
with losses, out losses account for 70-80% in the irrigation system,
and if this year is a dry year, we won’t be able to supply water once
again,” she said and added focus should be on minimizing the losses.

http://ecolur.org/en/news/water/reservoirs-can-be-half-empty-not-because-of-weather-but-shpps-specialists/6987/

Defense Ministry Trying To Cover Up Murder Case To Save Face Of Mili

DEFENSE MINISTRY TRYING TO COVER UP MURDER CASE TO SAVE FACE OF MILITARY OFFICIAL – HRAPARAK

02.04.2015 12:32 epress.am

Six days have passed since the murder of a trainee at the Military
Institute after Vazgen Sargsyan, however the Ministry of Defense is
still not releasing the information that one of the arrested suspects’
father is the Deputy Chief of the Institute’s Armaments department,
Colonel Zarmik Markosyan, writes journalist Syuzan Simonyan for
Hraparak daily.

The journalist notes that Markosyan’s son, Gnel Tevosyan, is one of
the four trainees arrested for the murder of trainee Haykaz Barseghyan.

“According to our source, the monstrous crime’s main culprit
was Tevosyan who ruled others with his “authority” of being a
colonel’s son. The father and son, in fact, have different last
names. The informant revealed that Gnel had changed his last name,
in order to superficially change the connection between him and his
colonel father. Yesterday, Ministry of Defense Spokesperson Artsrun
Hovhannisyan was only given one question – what is the name of Military
Institute’s Deputy Head Markosyan? “I don’t know anyone by that name,”
answered Hovhannisyan, which is, obviously, unlikely.

This simply means that the Ministry of Defense is attempting to cover
up the incident, save the criminal from disgrace, defend his father’s
“good reputation,” although colonel Zarmik Markosyan, as well as the
Institute’s other Deputy head, Armen Mzikyan, have been relieved from
their positions,” writes Syuzan Simonyan.

The article notes that the Ministry of Defense does not officially
explain why people are being fired, which allows the public to assume,
for example, that the deputies, as well as Lieutenant General Martin
Karapetyan, Head of the Military Institute after Vazgen Sargsyan,
were fired for this shameful incident last week.

“It is Minister of Defense Seyran Ohanyan’s style to punish his
subordinates, but to do it in such a way that no one knows why. Maybe
this is the reason that torture against soldiers and cases of murders
in the army have a tendency to repeat,” noted Simonyan.

While the Investigatory Committee is dealing with the murder case,
details are spreading throughout the media that Haykaz’s classmates
tried to subdue him, he defended himself, it led to a late night fight,
which led to the young man being suffocated with a pillow.

Haykaz’s body showed signs of beating, there were cuts on his veins.

Analysis | 04.02.15 | 09:50

http://www.epress.am/en/2015/02/04/defense-ministry-trying-to-cover-up-murder-case-to-save-face-of-military-official-hraparak.html

There Are Not Third-Class Persons: Grievances Continue In Parliament

THERE ARE NOT THIRD-CLASS PERSONS: GRIEVANCES CONTINUE IN PARLIAMENT

18:03 | February 4,2015 | Politics

During today’s question-and-answer session, opposition lawmaker
Lyudmila Sargsyan addressed a question to Minister of Health Armen
Muradyan.

However, it turned out that Minister Muradyan did not participate
in the session and none of his deputies had come to replace him. “We
have already witnessed an unacceptable phenomenon today when Chairman
of the Control Chamber Ishkan Zakaryan did not turn up to present the
report of the Chamber which was eventually presented by a third-class
person. Isn’t this a breach of the Constitution?” she said. Then
she continued her question, “The Chamber’s suggests that they have
detected 72 cases of violation in the healthcare sector. Besides,
it says that over AMD 50 million has been allocated to patients
diagnosed with tuberculosis. Have the offenders been made accountable?”

“There are not third-class persons. As the minister is not here,
you can address your question in a written form,” said Parliament
Speaker Galust Sahakyan.

http://en.a1plus.am/1205355.html