The Jewish Vote And The French Election

THE JEWISH VOTE AND THE FRENCH ELECTION
by Nicholas Simon

The Jerusalem Report
April 2, 2007

France’s Jews jokingly divide their country’s politicians into two
categories: former ministers who are friends of Israel, and serving
ministers who are former friends of Israel.

When it comes to candidates for office, however, they all try their
best to be included in the first category. And France’s Jews realize
very well that the politicians cozy up for their votes – but then
quickly forget their campaign promises and conduct the usual pro-Arab
policy when reaching office. This time, they hope, however, that
whoever reaches office will not forget the earlier campaign pledges
to institute a more evenhanded French policy toward the Jewish state.

Although Jewish issues and Israel are not a main topic in the campaign
now furiously under way for the successor to President Jacques Chirac,
and although Jews hardly make up 1 percent of the 42 million voters,
the mythical "Jewish vote" is far from forgotten.

If as expected, no one wins an outright majority in the first-round
vote on April 22, there will be a run-off on May 6 between the two
candidates who scored highest two weeks before, and according to
opinion polls, these are likely to be conservative Interior Minister
Nicholas Sarkozy, who is leading the field with around 30 percent and
Socialist Segolene Royal with around 26 percent. Centrist Francois
Bayrou is credited with about 18 percent and ultra-rightist Jean-Marie
Le Pen with 12 percent. The rest is divided among half a dozen other
politicians, none of whom is credited with more than a few points
each. But a surprise was always possible, and centrist Francois Bayrou,
a longtime friend of the French Jewish Community, suddenly surged in
the polls in early March, coming very close to Royal.

The polls indicated Sarkozy would trounce Royal by about 54-46
percent if they face each other in the runoff. Sarkozy has assiduously
courted the Jewish vote for years and Royal made efforts to attract
Jews at the start of the campaign. But as electioneering heated up
in March, both major candidates stood on their records and avoided
ultra-controversial topics like Arab immigration and the Middle East
conflict in an effort not to alienate any potential voters.

"Mathematically, the Jewish vote should really not count," says Meir
Waintrater, editor-in-chief of the respected Jewish monthly magazine
L’Arche. "But I punched the words ‘Jewish vote’ on Google in French
and got 21,700 results. There are nearly twice as many Protestants
in France as there are Jews, and yet, there were only 106 references
in texts to a ‘Protestant vote.’ And only 56 about Armenian votes,
although France has Western Europe’s biggest Armenian population with
350,000 people," (more than half of the number of Jews).

Does that mean Jews count 200 times more in France than Protestants,
and 400 times more than Armenians? "Apparently so in many minds,
though unfortunately, one suspects that fantasies about ‘Jewish power’
are the reason," says Waintrater.

"Nonetheless," he adds, "there are plenty of other groups in France
with specific interests. Amateur hunters and fishermen are far more
numerous than Jews when it comes to numbers of votes. And they are
far easier to satisfy by extending the hunting season than by fiddling
with foreign policy to please the Jews."

However, Waintrater says, many politicians believe individual
Jews often occupy positions in French society, which afford them
influence over segments of the general public. "When immensely
popular personalities like singer Enrico Macias (stage name of Gaston
Ghrenassia) and actor Roger Hanin (stage name of Roger Levy) say they
are going to vote for Nicolas Sarkozy, that counts enormously, even
if their votes are not necessarily motivated by factors connected to
their Jewish origins," says Waintrater.

He points to a cover story in the highbrow left-wing weekly Le
Nouvel Observateur last month, reporting a rightward swing by some
of France’s top intellectuals. The word "Jew" was not mentioned,
but, of five leading philosophers shown on the magazine’s cover,
Bernard-Henri Levy, Alain Finkielkraut and Andre Glucksman are Jewish.

"Well, multiply that, for example, by thousands of Jewish doctors and
pharmacists who speak to multitudes of people each day. What they have
to say is certainly of importance to politicians," says Waintrater.

One pharmacist, who has no qualms telling his clients who he is
going to vote for, is Casablanca-born Andre Elbaz, 45, a well-known,
much-liked figure in the middle class Paris suburb of Antony. "Like
me, the vast majority of people here are going to vote for Sarkozy,"
says Elbaz, an athletically built, good-looking man with a winning
smile. People come from throughout the neighborhood to consult him
on their aches and pains, swap jokes and ask who he is going to vote
for because they respect his opinion.

"Most of my clients are non-Jews so Israel is not really a subject
they’re interested in," says Elbaz, who owns a holiday apartment in
the Israeli seaside city of Ashdod. "What they are interested in,
and which is of top concern to many French people, and also obviously
to French Jews, is the lawlessness of young Arabs in French streets.

Everyone certainly hopes Sarkozy will crack down and restore order."

Although a middle-class area like Antony was not directly hit by the
late-2005 riots which swept through immigrant ghettos across France,
leaving 10,000 cars burned in three weeks, the memory of the upheaval,
together with continued soaring delinquency rates among young Arabs
and blacks, draws many voters to Sarkozy.

The media "guesstimates" that 80 percent of Jews will vote for
Sarkozy, but the Representative Council of French Jews (CRIF), the
roof organization for French Jewry, says it is not taking sides in
the election, except to remind Jews not to vote for ultra-rightist
Jean-Marie Le Pen, to whom polls are currently giving between 12 and
14 percent of the vote. This follows accusations by Royal supporters
that the CRIF’s attitude toward Sarkozy was openly supportive.

Parliamentarian Julien Dray, a Jew and a main Royal adviser, was
widely reported to have publicly shouted at a CRIF official: "You’ll
have to come crawling on hands and knees if you want to see her when
she is elected."

Conversely, no major French politician has devoted as much effort
over the years to endear himself to France’s 600,000-strong Jewish
community, the world’s third-largest after those of Israel and the
United States, as the 52-year-old Sarkozy.

Royal has built her career around domestic issues like health,
welfare and education. Her grasp of Middle East affairs is shaky,
as was demonstrated by a string of verbal gaffes she made during her
first-ever visit to the region, including Israel, last December.

During a stopover in Beirut, she met members of the Lebanese
parliament, including Hizballah MP Ali Ammar, who launched into a
violent anti-American and anti-Israeli diatribe in Arabic. Royal
replied that she "shared part of his analysis concerning President
Bush’s policies," which instantly drew condemnation from conservatives
in France and later apparently caused Hilary Clinton to call off a
scheduled meeting with Royal in the U.S. But the next day, Royal said
she had belatedly learned Ammar also compared Israel to Nazi Germany
and this had not been translated for her. She said she would have
left the room had she known this was said. Accompanying journalists
were sceptical about the explanation, believing her belated reaction
was prompted by aides contemplating possible damage control. She also
flipflopped on Israeli reconnaissance flights over Lebanon, saying
while in Lebanon that they should cease and later saying in Israel
that she understood why they were needed. Earlier she made statements
indicating she mixed up Iranian civilian and military nuclear efforts.

Royal’s main presumed Jewish connection is Francois Hollande, the
secretary general of the French Socialist Party, who is her partner
(they are not married) and the father of their four children. But
Hollande has no community ties and keeps his presumed Jewish origins
so secret that Jewish friends of the couple say he always evades
questions on the subject.

Close to three-quarters of French Jews are Sephardi, often with close
family ties in Israel. They or their parents fled France’s former
North African Arab territories of Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia when
they became independent between 1956-1962. Jews consequently maintain
a deep grudge against France’s 6 million Muslims, who in turn, brought
with them to France anti-Jewish prejudices harbored in their home
countries. Hostility between the two groups has increased in recent
years as young French Muslims regularly harass or attack Jews to
"avenge" Palestinian brethren. The death a year ago of telephone
salesman Ilan Halimi, 23, after three weeks of agonizing torture at
the hands of a gang of mostly Muslim hoodlums, who kidnapped him for
ransom, has caused outright hatred.

French Jewish solidarity with Israel is near unanimous, unfettered
and highly emotional. Sarkozy knows this from multiple appearances
at Jewish events. His first trip abroad, after taking over the
neo-Gaullist UMP party in 2004 in order to turn it into a machine to
propel him to the Elysee presidential palace, was to Israel. After
the obligatory photo at the Western Wall, he was received by a beaming
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon who told him: "We know you fully realize
we see you as one of our friends."

Sarkozy’s actions as Interior Minister, assigning police and funds
to protect Jewish premises against anti-Semitic attacks, has been
rewarded with prizes from the Simon Wiesenthal Center and B’nai B’rith.

Patrick Gaubert, a prominent French Jewish figure and president of
the influential International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism
(LICRA) describes Sarkozy as "the real star for French Jews."

Minister for Regional Development Christian Estrosi, a key Sarkozy
aide and a non-Jew, sums it up when he says, "Nicolas Sarkozy is the
natural candidate of French Jewry."

When Sarkozy made a lengthy and emotional speech on January 14 to
launch his campaign before tens of thousands of enthusiastic backers,
he conjured up a dozen figures of French history, from Joan of Arc to
Emile Zola and Charles de Gaulle. Saying they had inspired him to seek
the presidency, he included Georges Mandel, a Jewish predecessor as
French Interior Minister who was murdered by French Nazi collaborators
in 1944. Sarkozy, who wrote a biography of Mandel in 1994, also said
that his own life was marked by a visit to Yad Vashem in Jerusalem
where he stood amid multiple small lights twinkling in memory of a
million Jewish children killed during the Shoah.

Some members of the French Jewish community are even convinced that
"Sarko" is Jewish. He is not, but he does have a powerful Jewish
family tie, his maternal grandfather who raised him in the absence of
his unconventional father, Paul Sarkozy de Nagy-Bosca, a non-Jewish
minor Hungarian aristocrat who came to France after World War II to
escape Soviet rule in his home country.

A tall, seductive man who dabbled in art, advertising and bankruptcy,
he married Andree Mallah, a Paris law student and daughter of a
well-to-do doctor. They had three children, all boys, of whom Nicolas
was the second. In 1959, when Nicolas was four, Paul walked out on his
family. Relations between father and son have been poor ever since,
including several years when a teenage Nicolas refused all contact.

Sarkozy’s mother, left without financial support, resumed her law
studies and moved back to her parents’ three-story townhouse in an
elegant Paris neighborhood. She later became a successful lawyer.

When she came back to the family home, her father had been a widower
for three years and was delighted to have his daughter and three
young grandsons live with him.

The adored grandfather who became the main male influence in the life
of the young Nicholas was Benedict ("Benico") Mallah, born into the
once-powerful Jewish community of Salonika, the eastern Mediterranean
port city long dubbed "The Jerusalem of the Balkans." Sephardi Jews
settled in Salonika after their expulsion from Spain in 1492. They
prospered for centuries under Ottoman rule and made up a majority of
the city’s population at the start of the 20th century.

In 1904, "Benico" Mallah’s wealthy jeweller parents, Mordechai and
Reina, sent their 14-year-old son to boarding school in Paris. He
was later admitted to Paris University medical school but did not
return to Salonika because the situation deteriorated for Jews after
the city came under Greek rule in 1912. Those who remained were later
wiped out by the Nazis.

Benedict Mallah served as a doctor in the French army during World War
I when he met his future wife Adele Bouvier, then a nurse and young
war widow. Her parents baulked at the idea that their daughter would
marry a non-Catholic so he converted to please them. He is not known
to have set foot again in a church after his wedding, but neither is
he known to have gone back to synagogue, fitting into, and prospering,
in France’s highly secularized society.

Dr. Mallah’s Jewish origins came back to haunt him during World War II
when he and his family hid for two years in a rural French village,
fearing discovery by the Nazis for whom a Jew was a Jew, converted
to Catholicism or not. Nicolas was baptized, married in church, but,
as he grew up, he was always considered "not entirely French" by some
schoolmates and neighbors. He now describes himself as "an immigrant’s
son with mixed blood" and, if elected, would be modern France’s
first-ever national leader with such powerful foreign antecedents.

Sarkozy’s former fashion-model wife Cecilia, who made the cover
of Paris-Match in 2005, when she left him for the French-Jewish
advertising executive Richard Attias, has even fewer French connections
and some possible tenuous Jewish ones as well. Her mother was Spanish
and her wealthy furrier father, Andrei Ciganer, was born in Odessa,
Russia. French Jews believe he was Jewish and point out that one
of Cecilia’s middle names is Sara and that her eldest daughter by an
earlier marriage is called Judith. The Sarkozys, who have a 10-year-old
son, have reunited.

Sarkozy has further foreign connections since a step-sister and a
step-brother, children of his father by one of his other marriages,
reside in the United States and are U.S. citizens.

It is a weightier issue concerning the United States, which has been
prominent in the news in France in recent months. Sarkozy has long
been one of the most pro-American politicians on the French scene.

Speaking to the American Jewish Committee in Washington in 2004, he
boasted that French journalists called him "Sarkozy the American"
and he said he took that as a compliment. The nickname was not,
however, meant to be laudatory and there was a row last September
when a Socialist party report described Sarkozy as "an American
neo-conservative with a French passport."

This followed Sarkozy’s calling on President George Bush at the White
House. Bush is detested by much of the mostly left-leaning French
press and Sarkozy was blasted by French media after he said while
in the U.S. that he regretted "French arrogance" toward the United
States in leading diplomatic efforts to prevent the second Gulf War.

Sarkozy pledged that if he was president, "France would never again
appear to rejoice when America was in trouble."

The words have come back to haunt him because Sarkozy now needs
President Chirac, who conceived the anti-U.S. campaign, to support
his bid for the five-year presidential term. Sarkozy has therefore
started to water down his once-unwavering support for the U.S. and
praised Chirac’s role during the Iraq conflict. Unveiling his foreign
policy platform at a news conference in Paris on February 28, Sarkozy
pledged deep friendship to the United States, but asked Washington
to stay out of French affairs while paying tribute to Chirac for
"lucidity " in keeping out of the Iraq conflict he described as a
"historical error."

Some Jews immediately scrutinized Sarkozy’s statements to see if there
was any such turnabout concerning Israel. They were reassured to see
statements demanding the disarming of Hizballah and rejecting the
possibility of a nuclear-armed Iran, "which would be a danger for the
existence of Israel." But there was some unease that, while Sarkozy
repeated "Israel’s security is non-negotiable," he echoed Chirac’s
stance that Israeli military reaction in Lebanon last summer was
"disproportionate."

And especially, they noted, each sentence about Israel’s security
needs was linked with words about the need for a "viable Palestinian
state." That wasn’t really new, but French Jews are not used to
hearing it from Sarkozy in the same breath as his backing for Israel.

The very next morning, Claude Goasguen, a close Sarkozy ally and the
vice chairman of the Israel-France parliamentary friendship group,
was on French Jewish radio to soothe ever-sensitive Jewish anxieties.

"Is Monsieur Sarkozy changing his stance toward Israel?" he was
asked. "Not at all," Goasguen replied. "President Chirac is going
to speak in a few days and we have no interest whatsoever in showing
the deep differences which exist in our camp on these subjects," he
said candidly. Goasguen added: "I think that with time, we will be
able to obtain a radical change in French policy, which will bring us
back to true friendship between France and Israel and that we will,
once and for all, end all differences between the two countries."

Time will tell. There is another French proverb which says: "The
only people who believe promises by politicians are those to whom
they are made."

Armenians Pay Their Last Respect To Prime Minister Andranik Margaria

ARMENIANS PAY THEIR LAST RESPECT TO PRIME MINISTER ANDRANIK MARGARIAN

ARMENPRESS
Mar 28 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 28, ARMENPRESS: Thousands of Armenians, government
officials, foreign diplomats and representatives of many governments
came today to Opera and Ballet Theater in downtown Yerevan to pay
their last respects to Prime Minister Andranik Margarian who died of
a heart failure on Sunday, March 25.

Before Margarian’s body was laid in state at the theater it was
transported from his apartment in a Yerevan district to the central
office of his Republican Party and the government premises.

The burial service will be held later today at Komitas Pantheon,
a site reserved only for the most prominent Armenians.

Turkish politician held over murder of Dink

MWC News, Canada
March 26 2007

Turkish politician held over murder

Global
Written by Agencies

Turkish police have detained a right-wing politician for
interrogation in connection with the killing of an ethnic Armenian
journalist, a news channel has reported.

Police detained Yasar Cihan, head of the local branch of the
conservative and nationalist Great Unity party in the port city of
Trabzon, private NTV television reported on Sunday.

The detention came several hours after Patriarch Mesrob II, the
spiritual head of the Armenian Orthodox community in Turkey,
criticised the authorities for failing to find those who ordered the
killing of Hrant Dink.

Dink was killed outside his paper, Agos, in Istanbul in January.

Prosecutors have pressed charges against 10 suspects, including some
former members of the youth wing of Great Unity.

According to NTV, police were still looking for another leading
member of Great Unity, Halis Egemen.

Dink’s killing prompted international condemnation as well as debate
within Turkey about free speech, and whether state institutions were
tolerant of militant nationalists.

475&Itemid=1

http://mwcnews.net/content/view/13

US Secr. of State Rice, administration warn against genocide resol.

Southeast European Times, MD
March 27 2007

US Secretary of State Rice, administration officials warn against
Armenian genocide resolution
27/03/2007

Top US officials, including Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, have
been seeking to convince lawmakers not to pass a resolution that
defines the World War I killings of Armenians as genocide. Supporters
say the bill is a moral imperative, but opponents argue that it would
hurt US interests and damage ties with Ankara.

The United States should leave Turkey and Armenia to resolve their
dispute on whether the mass killings of Armenians in the wane of the
Ottoman Empire constituted genocide, US Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice told a US Congressional committee Wednesday (March
21st).

"What we’ve encouraged the Turks and the Armenians to do is to have
joint historical commissions that can look at this, to have efforts
to examine their past, and in examining their past to get over it,"
the AP quoted her as saying. "I don’t think it helps that process of
reconciliation for the United States to enter this debate at that
level," Rice added.

She was responding to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif), sponsor of a bill
defining the killings of up to 1.5 million Armenians in the Ottoman
Empire during World War I as genocide. Supporters say passing such
legislation is a moral imperative, while opponents argue that the
cost, in terms of US interests and relations with Ankara, is too
high.

In recent weeks, senior US officials have sought to convince
lawmakers that passage of such legislation might not only damage
US-Turkish co-operation, but could impede efforts by Turkey’s
Armenian community to persuade the country to come to terms with its
past.

"Members of the Armenian-Turkish community tell us that such
resolutions would stifle the dialogue they seek and would even raise
popular emotions so dramatically as to threaten the progress they
have made in Turkey," US Assistant Secretary of State for European
and Eurasian Affairs Daniel Fried said in a testimony before the
House Foreign Affairs Committee Subcommittee on Europe on March 15th.

He also warned that if the legislation were passed, Turkey might
respond by closing down the Incirlik air base, a key hub for air
cargo shipments for US troops in Iraq. According to Fried, Ankara
could also move to slow down traffic at the Habur gate on the border
with Iraq, or restrict overflight rights for US aircraft.

"Turkey’s contribution to the global war on terrorism and US
strategic objectives in the region is significant – it would all be
at risk," Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Europe and NATO
Daniel Fata told lawmakers at the same hearing on February 15th.
Similar worries were expressed in joint identical letters sent by
Rice and US Defence Secretary Robert Gates to House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi and other senior members of Congress.

Submitted on January 30th, Resolution 106, co-sponsored by nearly 180
US lawmakers, is expected to be put to the vote in the 435-member
House of Representatives in April. A similar bill was introduced in
the 100-seat Senate last week, with 21 of the body’s members backing
it.

Rep. Schiff says the legislation is needed in order to protect the
moral authority of the United States in dealing with human rights
atrocities, such as the killings in Darfur.

"More often with friends than foes you have to speak candidly," a UPI
report quoted him as saying. "I happen to believe … that the final
act of genocide is the denial of genocide."

Both resolutions would be non-binding and have no legal bearing on US
foreign policy. But their passage would serve as a rebuff to Turkey.
It has long argued that the killings, rather than constituting
genocide, were part of a general climate of instability in which
Turks also died. Analysts say the government of Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan would face strong domestic pressure to respond.

After France last year passed a bill making it a crime to deny that
the massacres of Armenians were a genocide, Turkey suspended all
military ties with the country, suspending also military contracts
that were already under discussion.

Recent months have seen increased lobbying efforts by senior Turkish
officials, including Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul and Chief of the
General Staff General Yasar Buyukanit.

A Turkish parliamentary delegation visited the United States last
week to press Ankara’s case against the bill, and representatives of
the Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen’s Association are
currently in Washington for the same reason.

sources: (AP, UPI – 21/03/07; The Washington Times – 20/03/07;
Hurriyet, Middle East Newsline – 19/03/07; Turkish Daily News, The
New Anatolian, Turkish Press – 17/03/07; Eurasianet, Turkish Daily
News, Zaman – 16/03/07; AP, Turkish Press, US Department of State –
15/03/07; AP – 14/03/07)

html/en_GB/features/setimes/features/2007/03/27/fe ature-01

http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/x

Territories are life and security for Karabakh people

Territories are life and security for Karabakh people

23-03-2007 11:53:24 – KarabakhOpen

Recently the mediators and political scientists have been using often
the term `provisional status’. What is it? What will Karabakh have to
face to once it accepts it?

The talks in Geneva, which generated `optimal’ proposals on solving
two issues, pullout of Armenian force from the territories around
Nagorno Karabakh and a provisional status for the unrecognized state
until a referendum is held, aroused anger among part of the public.
It should be noted that the people we talked to had no idea of this
decision, and these people had different occupations.

Narine Stepanayan from Stepanakert was indignant. `Are they trying to
fool us? How can people ever agree to return these territories? Whom
did the idea of pullout of force occur to? Who can guarantee our
security? Who gave Merzlyakov the right to decide our fate? We did not
fight to be caught in a trap today. The OSCE Minsk Group and the other
similar organizations should take into account what these territories
mean to each people. If for the people of Karabakh they are life and
security, for Azerbaijanis they are caprice and additional
territory. People may agree to live without luxury but they will fight
for their security and life. And no talks in Geneva can persuade of
the contrary.’

`Status? What status? We gained our status a long time ago. And it
sounds like this: we have established a state, we will be independent,
only our force will guard our security,’ Ashot Sargsyan comments. `The
winners are not judged. And we do not have to accept the terms of our
neighbor unless they are acceptable for us.’

`For me such decisions are not unexpected. I will not be surprised if
our government signs such an agreement,’ says Sergey Danielyan. `The
old saying runs: `If you want peace, prepare for war’. Today there is
an interesting situation in Karabakh. There is uncertainty in the
republic, whereas our `in charge’ are competing whose car is bigger
and more expensive and whose house is nicer. Their behavior shows that
they also want peace, but it is not clear who will be preparing for
war.’

Mortgage loan eligibility benchmarks not set yet

Mortgage loan eligibility benchmarks not set yet

23-03-2007 11:53:09 – KarabakhOpen

The government has confirmed the order of mortgage lending. The
government has also confirmed the staff of the commission, which sets
the benchmarks of eligibility for mortgage lending.

The commission continues to work on the benchmarks, said Armen
Avagyan, the d irector of the Artsakh Development Agency, in an
interview with KarabakhOpen.

The mortgage lending policy is implemented by the ADA. This year the
government assigned 700 million drams for mortgage loans.

According to Armen Avagyan, after ratification by the prime minister
the benchmarks will be released. Afterwards the applications will be
accepted. Armen Avagyan said they will probably announce the date of
submission of application in late March or in early April.

VimpelCom to provide Mobile Services under "Beeline" brand

Mediamax Agency, Armenia
March 23 2007

`Most likely, we will be providing mobile services in Armenia under
`Beeline’ brand’, Vice-President of `VimpelCom’ stated

Yerevan, March 22 /Mediamax/. The Vice-President of `VimpelCom’ OJSC
Sergey Avdeev stated in Tsakhkadzor today that `we will quickly
conclude the process of purchasing the 10% shares of the `ArmenTel’
Company from the Armenian government’.

Mediamax reports that today in Tsakhkadzor there took place the
conference of the Top-Managers of the `VimpelCom’ OJSC and the
General Directors of the Companies, which enter the `VimpelCom’
group: `ArmenTel’ (Armenia), `CaR-Tel’ (Kazakhstan), `Ukrainian
RadioSystems’ (Ukraine), `UNITEL’ (Uzbekistan), `TACOM’ (Tajikistan),
`MOBITEL’ (Georgia).

Sergey Avdeev reminded that the condition for selling the 10% share
of `ArmenTel’ was the renunciation of the new owner of the company
from monopoly rights.

`We renounced monopoly and hope to quite soon conclude the process of
purchasing the shares. We are glad that the Armenian government made
today the corresponding decision’, the Vice-President of `VimpelCom’
stated.

The `VimpelCom’ OJSC, which functions under the `Beeline’ brand,
purchased in November 2006 the 90% of the shares of `ArmenTel’ from
the Greek OTE for 341,9mln euro, and also took upon itself the 40mln
euros’ debts of the company.

Sergey Avdeev said that `sooner or later, we will start providing
mobile services in Armenia under the `Beeline’ brand’.

What concerns the fixed net; Sergey Avdeev and the CEO of `ArmenTel’
Oleg Bliznyuk consider it expedient to preserve the former brand.

`ArmenTel’ is not an ordinary company for us, as it provides both
fixed and mobile communication. We need some time to finally
understand how to put in order the work’, Sergey Avdeev stated.

According to the Vice-President of `VimpelCom’, `we know that
`ArmenTel’ does not have a very good image’. `We want to
de-monopolize the market, to establish a competitive environment, in
which the operators would hunt subscribers and not vice versa’, he
noted.

Answering Mediamax’s question, Sergey Avdeev confirmed that
`VimpelCom’ is examining the prospects of establishing in Armenia a
convergent product by means of combining the services of the mobile
and fixed nets.

`The idea is that being at home, you are talking by your ordinary
home telephone, and going out, using the same number on your mobile
phone’, the Vice-President of `VimpelCom’ stated.

At the same time, Sergey Avdeev admitted that `this is a future
service; it does not have a mass character yet’. `I even cannot name
large-scale convergent projects, which would be completed’, the
Vice-President of `VimpelCom’ stated.

`In `ArmenTel’ we have the possibility to try this service, as we
have an exceptionally felicitous combination of fixed and mobile
services in the hands of one operator. We are potentially close to
the point to realize the given service at least in a testing regime’,
Sergey Avdeev stated.

`It is very important for us to enlarge the set of products, which
would be realized in the fixed nets. In the nearest future for the
first time in Armenia the service of high-speed transfer of data
based on DSL technology will be implemented’, the Vice-President of
`VimpelCom’ OJSC stated.

"You Forget That I Am the Mayor of Moscow"

A1+

`YOU FORGET THAT I AM THE MAYOR OF MOSCOW’
[06:50 pm] 23 March, 2007

`I approve of the words of RF and RA Presidents; Russia is Armenia’s
number one economic partner’, Ervand Zakharyan, Mayor of Yerevan City,
announced during the inauguration of the House of Moscow in Yerevan.

To note, tomorrow Ervand Zakharyan will participate in the opening
ceremony of a trade centre of Yerevan in Moscow together with his
Russian counterpart Yuri Luzhkov.

`The House of Moscow in Yerevan symbolizes not only the military
collaboration of the two countries, but also the level of new
relations between the countries after the collapse of the Soviet
Union. It is necessary to enhance political, economic, cultural and
human ties between the two countries under question’, Yuri Luzhkov
notes.

One of the journalists wondered why the construction works were
confined with Russian investments.

`You forget that I am the Mayor of Moscow. I can only speak in the
name of Moscow. Yerevan conducts its own policy. As for the foreign
investors, the question is beyond comment’», Yuri Luzhkov says.

Asked the question whether the mayor’s family intends to start
business in Armenia, Mr. Luzhkov said, `My wife has her own business
and I never intervene in her affairs. She is a successful
businesswoman. It is up to her to decide whatever she needs. I have
absolutely no influence on her affairs. I get informed from the press
what she has bought, sold, etc.’

To note, Yuri Luzhkov notices great changes in Armenia. `Yerevan has
become more beautiful. The number of new constructions has
increased. I like the fact that there are no casinos in the city
centre’, Yuri Luzhkov points out.

Azerbaijan seeks US support in NK talks by offering transit

Azerbaijan seeks US support in Karabakh talks by offering transit of Turkmen
gas

Hayots Ashkharh, Yerevan
24 Mar 07

Text of report entitled: "Azerbaijan’s gas attack on Karabakh
negotiation process" by Vardan Grigoryan published in Armenian
newspaper Hayots Ashharh on 24 March:

Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov, who recently was in
Brussels, made an unexpected statement that "buying natural gas
directly from Turkmenistan and not via Russia could contribute to the
strengthening of the European Union’s energy security."

The Transcaspian gas pipeline, which is designed to transport part of
the Turkmen gas to Baku along the seabed and further to Europe, has
not been built yet. It looks like that the Azerbaijani foreign
minister is running early by making hasty statements, especially that
the Russian Gazprom has a 25-year agreement with Turkmenistan, plus,
it plans to build the second Turkmenistan-Russia gas pipeline.

This show could have been strange, but on the next day, 22 March,
Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov and US Secretary of
State Condoleeza Rice signed a memorandum of understanding on
cooperation between the USA and Azerbaijan in Caspian region. It turns
out that Azerbaijan is rushing ahead and making this move to present
the USA with a gift "decorated" with valuable gas during the
Rice-Mammadyarov meeting.

Liberating Europe from the Russian "gas dictate" is among the hottest
tasks of the current American diplomacy. So, by proposing the USA its
"brokerage mission" of offering a "gas alternative" for the Old World
[Europe], Azerbaijan is trying to "link" this "service" with the
Rice-Mammadyarov meeting, the core of which is apparently the Karabakh
conflict settlement.

What is the main goal of Azerbaijan at the current stage when Ilham
Aliyev, who leads that country’s diplomacy, insists that his country
needs another two or three years to reach an "absolute advantage" over
Armenia to resolve the Karabakh issue, and the mediators are keen to
settle the conflict? For its part, Armenia openly says that it agrees
with the principles of the document on the "negotiations table," but
doubts that Azerbaijan is ready to come to an agreement based on those
principles in summer.

We believe this is why the statement about the Transcaspian gas
pipeline for the international community was made on the eve of the
Rice-Mammadyarov meeting. The pipeline does not exist yet but
Azerbaijan’s resolve to build a pipeline that circumvents Russia is
already a fact, and it sheds light on the problems that rose at the
Geneva meeting of Mammadyarov and [Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan]
Oskanyan. Azerbaijan sticks to details to review the negotiation
principles and it desperately needs the support of the United States
for that. And one of the basic issues of the negotiations, as the
Armenian foreign minister reiterated days ago, is the accomplishment
of the NKR [Nagornyy Karabakh republic] people’s right to
self-determination. So, Azerbaijan’s readiness to pump the Turkmen gas
to Azerbaijan via the Transcaspian pipeline instead of doing so
through Russia is a prepayment offered to the US in exchange for a
support in the Armenian-Azerbaijani talks. Azerbaijan is trying to
show its "indispensability" in the Caspian energy resource export
routes, which would allow it to strengthen its positions or even
derail the talks and get away unpunished.

It is becoming clearer that Azerbaijan’s desire to review the document
on the table will be the main obstacle in the way of signing a
framework agreement this summer. Exploiting the prospect for its
economic attractiveness, Azerbaijan will do whatever it takes to gain
more in the forthcoming talks. Meanwhile, by adopting a seemingly
peaceful position, Azerbaijan will try to concentrate the
international community’s pressure on Armenia to get more concessions.

Under these circumstances, it is essential that Armenia not retreat
from the key issues already agreed upon in the "framework agreement."
Armenia should make every effort to ensure that the talks continue
around the already-clarified principles. This would frustrate
Azerbaijan’s revisionist ambitions, and it will have to face the
option that it is to blame for the failed talks.

Nagorno-Karabakh To Be Represented At Globe-2007 International Touri

NAGORNO-KARABAGH TO BE REPRESENTED AT GLOBE-2007 INTERNATIONAL TOURIST EXHIBITION

DeFacto Agency, Armenia
March 22 2007

March 22-25 GLOB-2007 international tourist exhibition will be held
in Rome. The tourist operators from RA will also participate in
the measure.

Nagorno-Karabagh will be represented at the exhibition as
well, however, not by a separate pavilion, but via Armenian
tourist operators, Director of the Agency for the Development of
Nagorno-Karabagh Republic Tourism Sergey Shahverdian told DE FACTO
agency today. In his words, a lot of tourists display great interest to
visiting Nagorno-Karabagh, so in this connection RA tourist companies
include the NKR in the program of visits to Caucasus.

Sergey Shahverdian stated the prospects on the Nagorno-Karabagh were
in some demand of the foreign tourists.