The Wall Street Journal: Turkey And Armenia Pave Wy For Hstoric Acor

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: TURKEY AND ARMENIA PAVE WY FOR HSTORIC ACORDS

armradio.am
02.04.2009 13:21

Turkey and Armenia could soon announce a deal aimed at reopening their
border and restoring relations, a move that could help stabilize a
region that’s increasingly important as a transit route for oil and
gas, the Wall Street Journal reports, quoting diplomats.

The timing of the deal is being choreographed with the schedule of U.S.

President Barack Obama, who visits Turkey next week, these people say.

The Turkish and Armenian governments have agreed on terms to open
formal talks in three areas: opening and fixing borders, restoring
diplomatic relations and setting up commissions to look at disputes,
including one on the tense history between the two nations.

Normalizing relations between Turkey and Armenia would "create a new
and positive dynamic" in relations across the region, "as well as
in developing the economic and transport links we have been pursuing
ever since the collapse of the former Soviet Union," said U.S. Deputy
Assistant Secretary of State Matthew J Bryza, the State Department’s
point man in the Caucasus.

Mr. Bryza travels to Azerbaijan Thursday to discuss how a
Turkish-Armenian agreement could help revive efforts for a settlement
on Nagorno-Karabakh.

Announcement of a Turkish-Armenian pact is also being influenced by
Mr. Obama’s campaign promise to support a Congressional resolution
that would rec ognize as genocide the Ottoman Empire’s 1915 killing
of up to 1.5 million Armenians in what is now central and eastern
Turkey. Turkey fiercely denies the killings were genocide. The White
House traditionally makes a statement to mark Armenian Remembrance
Day on April 24.

Analysts say Turkey’s government hopes progress in reviving its
relations with Armenia could prompt the White House not to recognize
the killings as genocide and to block the Congressional resolution.

If the U.S. proceeds with the genocide resolution, "I cannot imagine
any Turkish government opening the Armenian border," said Ozgur
Unluhisarcikli, director of the Ankara office of the German Marshall
Fund of the United States, a think tank.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey said on Turkish
television last week he would discuss Nagorno-Karabakh, the Armenian
"genocide" and relations between Russia and Georgia with the
U.S. president, among other issues.

One date under discussion for signing the deal with Armenia, diplomats
say, is April 16. But Mr. Unluhisarcikli said he believes Turkey and
Armenia won’t be ready to sign the deal before April 24, and Turkey
instead will "signal" its commitment to reopen the borders in the
hope that will be enough for Washington.

Open Armenian-Turkish Border VS "Angry"

OPEN ARMENIAN-TURKISH BORDER VS "ANGRY" AZERBAIJAN

Panorama.am
14:50 01/04/2009

"Military balance is changing in the region," says the Director of
the Armenian Center for National and International Studies Richard
Giragosian and ensures that as soon as the Armenian-Turkish closed
border is opened a new wave of change will be witnessed. "Regarding
the military issues, we feel some threats to come from Azerbaijan
and not from Turkey. After the Georgian war Armenia has a new role
and power in the region regarding the change in military balance,"
said R. Giragosian. According to the expert opened Armenian-Turkish
border is not a threat for Armenia but Azerbaijan is a real threat. The
expert says he thinks Armenian-Turkish border will be opened after
May this year.

Armenian Community Of Syria Concerned With Turkish TV Serials

ARMENIAN COMMUNITY OF SYRIA CONCERNED WITH TURKISH TV SERIALS

Noyan Tapan
March 31, 2009

ALEPPO, MARCH 31, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. The Armenian
community of Syria expressed concern with the show of Turkish TV
serials increasing day by day in the country.

According to Turkish media, Nora Arisian, one of the prominent
representatives of Armenian community of Syria, voiced strict criticism
on the issue.

"Turkish TV serials have started influencing the Armenian families
equally to the Armenian Genocide and leaving incurable wounds on the
Armenian consciousness," Nora Arisian stated.

Turkish media, in its turn, touching upon the activity of the Armenian
youth organization of Syria mentioned that the latter is concerned with
the noticed rapprochement in Turkish-Syrian relations. A 2009 calendar
was published with the youth organization’s efforts, on which a map
of Erzrum, Kars, Van, Ararat is depicted. And calendar’s first page
presents the photographs of President of Syria Bashar Asad and leader
of Armenian Apostolic Church Berio Diocese Archbishop Shahan Sargsian.

BAKU: Azeri Public In Breathless Expectation Of Outcome Of Turkish-A

AZERI PUBLIC IN BREATHLESS EXPECTATION OF OUTCOME OF TURKISH-ARMENIAN DIALOGUE

Turan News Agency
March 24 2009
Azerbaijan

The Azerbaijani public in general, politicians and the media separately
are trying to second-guess the outcome of the Turkish-Armenian
dialogue, a piece produced by Azerbaijani think-tank group has
concluded. Against the background of opportune geopolitical situation,
the government of Erdogan set to take advantage of the situation
emerged in the Caucasus after the Russian-Georgian August war,
step up its role and subsequently settle down problems with Armenia
to clear obstacles along the way to the European Union, the article
said. Under the report, Turkey seems agreed to this move with Russia
although the initiative put forward previously by other leaders failed
as they were not backed by the key regional players. The following
is the text of analytical report by private Azerbaijani news agency
Turan on 24 March headlined "A proposal hard to reject"; subheadings
have been inserted editorially:

Turkey’s geopolitical and diplomatic role has begun to grow in the
region since about the second half of last year which, in its turn,
became a reason for all-possible gossips.

Caucasus alliance

As is known, on 11 August 2008 following the Russian intervention in
Georgia, Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan spoke about the possibility of
forming a Caucasus alliance. Two days later, he voiced this idea on a
visit to Moscow. And on 20 August Turkey proposed a Caucasus Stability
and Cooperation Platform (CSCP). As was stated, "first of all, the
platform has geopolitical grounds, pursues an aim of establishing
peace and security in the region, and secures economic cooperation
and energy security". The work on the realization of the CSCP allowed
Turkey to further step up "shuttle" diplomacy and political presence in
the region. Subsequently, there came a turn of a "football diplomacy"
when in defiance of the expectations, the Turkish president accepted
the invitation of the new Armenian president to watch a qualifying
game between the two countries’ national football teams in Yerevan.

This meeting has given an impetus to the resumption of the active
Turkish-Armenian dialogue in the course of which the prospect of
settling many disputed problems, including the issue of opening the
borders between the two countries, are being discussed in earnest. To
say that those active and uncommon initiatives of Turkey were
interpreted ambiguously by the Azerbaijani public would mean nothing
to say. Thus, a part of the public believes that playing with Russia
and Armenia, the government of Erdogan is gradually distancing itself
from the West (the USA) by indirectly betraying Azerbaijan’s interests.

Similar moods were heated up by some reports carried by the
Turkish media. Sabah newspaper controlled by the son-in-law of the
Turkish prime minister, reported on 13 March that as a result of
secret Armenian-Turkish talks an agreement was hammered out on the
establishment of diplomatic relations, appointment of ambassadors
and setting up a joint commission for the purpose of normalization of
mutual relations, the conduct of investigation into the 1915 events,
discussion of issues of territorial claims of Armenia to Turkey,
the opening of borders and beginning of trade relations.

Under the same report, information on this agreement would be made
public after 24 April. The similar information was also carried
by Star newspaper close to the government circles. The concern
of the Azerbaijani public is understandable though unreasonably
overstated. So in comment on the agitating reports of the Turkish
newspapers, the Turkish ambassador to Azerbaijan Hulusi Kilic said on
18 March that "statements on the opening of borders are heard only in
the media. Turkey’s policy about Azerbaijan remains unchanged." Similar
statements were also made by other Turkish officials.

Nothing new in Erdogan’s initiative

Feverish reactions of a series of our media outlets to the CSCP are
also surprising. The idea of CSCP initiated by Erdogan is not new. At
one time, the late former presidents of Georgia and Ichkeria, Zviad
Gamsakhurdia, and Dzhokhar Dudayev, initiated the idea of establishing
A Caucasus Home which would unite the Caucasus peoples.

In 1992, they even set up a confederation of the Caucasus peoples
where Georgia, Azerbaijan and a series of movements from the North
Caucasus joined. After several years, the next president of Chechnya,
Aslan Maskhadov, and another Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze
discussed the issue of establishing an organization on security
and cooperation in the Caucasus. Discussed was also the issue of
establishing a Caucasus parliament a structure to unite the South
Caucasus region and republics of the North Caucasus. In 1996 during a
visit of the Azerbaijani former president, Heydar Aliyev, to Georgia,
a Tbilisi declaration was signed where there was also talk on the
Caucasus Home under the South Caucasus.

On 15 January 2000 in Tbilisi [the former] Turkish President
Suleyman Demirel put forward a pact on stability in the South
Caucasus. However, as distinct from previous projects, the plan
of Demirel was geographically broad it enveloped not also the South
Caucasus but also the Black Sea basin with the exit to the Balkans and
should have been realized under the aegis of the OSCE. With similar
integration-related projects for the Caucasus in the various versions
came forward earlier the USA, Russia and the EU countries. In previous
years, this idea did not cause a surge of emotions and rejection in
our society. Apparently, at that time, no-one did believe in its quick
implementation. It looked definitely unpersuasive since other than
Azerbaijan and Georgia, all other countries of the region had very
fundamental contradictions between themselves. Nevertheless, after
the August 2008 events in the South Caucasus there emerged a certain
vacuum. On the one hand, by recognizing independence of Abkhazia
and South Ossetia, Moscow certainly weakened tangibly the position
of the USA. However, on the other hand, with these acts, it also
significantly complicated own claims to the role of a peace-keeper,
guarantor and arbiter. The "geopolitical breaches" that have emerged
in the region allowed Turkey to develop unprecedented activity which
technically met interests of both the West and Russia. Damaging own
image, Russia made attempts to acquire at least temporary allies in
confrontation with the West (the USA).

Moves designed to step up Turkey’s role in Caucasus

Under the existing situation, such an ally for Russia could only
be Turkey. Being from "the western camp", at the same time, it has
certain "resentment" at own allies. Moreover, Turkey depends on
Russian gas supplies and has a solid goods turnover (34bn dollars)
with it. At the same time, Turkey with its activity could neutralize
undesirable for Russia geopolitical influence of other players on the
South Caucasus. Probably, all these were understood well in Ankara and
possibly exactly, these considerations made Erdogan to reanimate the
idea of integration into the South Caucasus. And it is not surprising
that Moscow supported this project within which there was not any
hint at other players apart from the South Caucasus, Turkey and Russia.

In a nutshell, the August proposal of Erdogan was not at all
spontaneous, it had own prehistory and evolved in the course of
development of events and it goes without saying has own aims. The most
important of them for Turkey is to reinforce its role in the region. It
is also clear that the task of the West in the South Caucasus is
to tear Armenia off Russia. It is obvious that the opening of the
Turkish-Armenian borders serves simultaneously the strengthening of
Turkey’s role and reducing the level of confrontation in the region (by
significantly facilitating the realization of the West’s plans). Such
a role of Turkey, to all appearances, is absolutely acceptable for
the West (the USA). To this testifies the fact that US Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton paid an official visit to Turkey on 7 March
during which she was received by the president, prime minister and
foreign minister of the country.

The media characterized this visit as a "repairing move" (relations
between Ankara and Washington were fairly spoiled by the Bush
administration). It is noteworthy that after Hillary Clinton, new US
President Barack Obama is planning to visit Turkey in April. Another
target of Turkey is to end once and for all the boring problem of
recognition of mythic "genocide" of Armenians in the Ottoman empire. It
should be acknowledged there has cropped up a serious argument for
Turkey: recognition of the genocide may once and for all spoil mutual
relations between Ankara and Washington and bring to a standstill for a
long time the process of normalization of relations with Yerevan. The
latter is one of the conditions for Turkey to be accepted to the
European Union and therefore, the establishment of friendly relations
with Armenia will actually remove a threat of recognizing the genocide.

The realization of all these tasks will undoubtedly lead to
reinforcement of Turkey’s influence in the region and expand
its potential in the resolution of the existing conflicts in the
region. Exactly for this Turkey is currently doing everything in order
to reinforce its position in the South Caucasus. Yerevan also perceived
Erdogan’s initiative positively. No doubt that this step is important
for the Armenian authorities from a point of view of possibility of
joining regional energy projects. Thereby, official Yerevan cuts the
ground from under pro-Western electorate of the country with former
president Levon Ter-Petrosyan and multiplies its possibilities for
political manoeuvring. During an official visit of Erdogan to Baku
on 20 August, President Ilham Aliyev also backed the initiative
of the Turkish side. Probably, the Azerbaijani leadership fairly
decided that if the aim of Moscow is to retain under its influence
the South Caucasus with the help of the conflicts, then the breaking
this monopoly and Turkey’s involvement in the affairs of the region
opens for Baku more positive prospects.

Briefly, by initiating the CSCP and stepping up peace-keeping
activities in the region, Turkey, in essence has made a proposal,
from which it is hard for all countries to refuse. Time will show to
what extent this "proposal" meets Azerbaijan’s interests.

3 Year Suspended Sentence For Vardan Jhangiryan

3 YEAR SUSPENDED SENTENCE FOR VARDAN JHANGIRYAN

LRAGIR.AM
16:56:34 – 31/03/2009

The Kentron-Nork Marash first instance court pronounced the sentence
of Gagik Jhangiryan’s brother Vardan Jhangiryan, who was found
guilty based on the Article 316, and was sentenced to three year of
imprisonment.Considering the Article 69 of the Armenian Crime Code
and the 3 months and 28 days that Vardan Jhangiryan passed under
arrest, the court decided to sentence him to 2 year 8 months of
imprisonment. The court applied the Article 70 also and made the
decision not to execute the sentence, but put Vardan Jhangiryan on
a 3-year probation term

Ahmet Davutoglu : La diaspora condamne l’Armenie a la pauvrete

Nouvelles d’Arménie, France
Vendredi 27 Mars 2009

Ahmet Davutoglu : La diaspora condamne l’Arménie à la pauvreté

vendredi27 mars 2009, par Stéphane/armenews

Le conseiller en Affaires Etrangères du Premier ministre Recep
Tayyip Erdogan, le Professeur Ahmet Davutoglu a fait un discours
à l’Université Princeton sutr les principes de la
politique étrangère de la Turquie. S’exprimant sur les
relations entre la Turquie avec l’Arménie, Ahmet Davutoglu a
dit que l’attitude inopportune de la diaspora arménienne aux
Etats-Unis affecte les relations turco-arméniennes
négativeme nt. Affirmant que la Turquie est enclin à
avoir un accord avec l’Arménie, le Professeur Davutoglu a
déclaré "la Diaspora est en lutte pour la reconnaissance
du prétendu génocide arménien mais qu’elle ne
prenait pas en compte les intérêts de
l’Arménie. Un arménien qui vit à San Francisco ne
fait pas d’investissement à Yerevan. Aujourd’hui,
l’Arménie est le pays le plus pauvre de la région. Nous
aspirons à avoir davantage de coopération
économique avec nos voisins. Nous voulons des voisins riches
car nous croyons que cela rendra notre région plus
sûre."

Ahmet Davutoglu a dit que si les Etats-Unis reconnaissent le
prétendu génocide arménien, non seulement les
Etats-Unis et la Turquie mais l’Arménie aussi
souffriront. Déclarant que les solutions des problèmes
de l’Arménie avec la Turquie et l’Azerbaïdjan seront
avantageux pour les Etats-Unis, Ahmet Davutoglu a dit "si les
Etats-Unis perdent l’Azerbaïdjan dans la question du Karabakh,
donc cela signifiera qu’elle a perdu la porte orientale de la Mer
Caspienne."

BAKU: 3 Armenian servicemen appealed for leaving for third country

APA, Azerbaijan
March 29 2009

Three Armenian servicemen held captive in Azerbaijan appealed for
leaving for third country

[ 29 Mar 2009 15:06 ]

Baku. Kamala Guliyeva ` APA. Grant Markosian, Alik Tevosian and Artur
Sarkisian ` Armenian soldiers, who were detained by civilians near the
line of contact in Munakhorlu village of Agjabadi region on the night
of February 27-28 and handed over to Azerbaijani servicemen, appealed
for leaving for the third country, secretary of State Commission on
Prisoners of War, Hostages and Missing Persons Shahin Sailov told APA.

Sailov said their appeals were being considered.

`The Armenian servicemen have already appealed to the UN office in
Azerbaijan. It is not known when the appeal will be considered. It is
a long-lasting process. It took 8-9 months to send the previous
Armenian serviceman to the third country,’ he said.

Grant Markosian, Alik Tevosian and Artur Sarkisian crossed the line of
contact under the control of Azerbaijani Armed Forces on the night of
February 27-28. The Armenian soldiers said they did it, as there is
lack of care in the army and they can not even find bread to eat.

Armenia draws 2-2 with Estonia in qualifier

Armenia draws 2-2 with Estonia in qualifier
The Associated Press
March 28, 2009

 YEREVAN, Armenia: Armenia substitute Artur Yedigaryan scored a late
equalizer Saturday to give his team a 2-2 draw with Estonia in a World
Cup qualifier.
Yedigaryan came on for Levon Pachajyan in the 84th minute and headed
in Gevorg Ghazaryan’s cross four minutes later.
Henrikh Mkhitaryan gave Armenia the lead in the 31st minute, but
Konstantin Vassiljev leveled five minutes later from a narrow angle
off Martin Vunk’s pass from the right at Republican Stadium.
Estonia substitute Sergei Zenjov, who came on in the 63rd, beat
goalkeeper Roman Berezovski one-on-one five minutes later to make
it 2-1.
Estonia has two points in Group 5, one more than Armenia.
Lineups:
Armenia: Roman Berezovski, Sargis Hovsepyan, Robert Arzumanyan, Vahagn
Minasyan, Aghvan Lazarian, Levon Pachajyan (Artur Yedigaryan, 84),
Artur Voskanyan (Gevorg Ghazaryan, 46), Ararat Arakelyan, Artavazd
Karamyan, Henrikh Mkhitaryan, Arman Karamyan (Gevorg Kasparov, 62).
Estonia: Sergei Pareiko, Enar Jaager, Taavi Rahn, Raio Piiroja, Ragnar
Klavan, Tarmo Kink, Martin Vunk, Aleksandr Dmitrijev, Joei Lindpere
(Sander Puri, 76), Konstantin Vassiljev (Kaimar Saag, 87), Vladimir
Voskoboinikov (Sergei Zenjov, 63).

BSEC Secretary General Gave High Assessment To Armenia’s BSEC Chairm

BSEC SECRETARY GENERAL GAVE HIGH ASSESSMENT TO ARMENIA’S BSEC CHAIRMANSHIP

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.03.2009 17:55 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ RA foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian met today
with Black Sea Economic Cooperation Secretary General Leonidas
Chrysanthopoulos. The parties focused on BSEC agenda and Armenian’s
BSEC Chairmanship, assessed highly by BSEC Secretary General. Edward
Nalbandian and Leonidas Chrysanthopoulos dwelled on 20th meeting of
BSEC FA Ministers’ Council due on Apr.15-16 in Yerevan. RA FM and BSEC
Secretary General also referred to collaboration issues within BSEC.

Open Letter To Encourage Obama To Recognize Armenian Genocide

OPEN LETTER TO ENCOURAGE OBAMA TO RECOGNIZE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Panorama.am
14:00 26/03/2009

The international union of genocide experts sent an open letter to
the President of the United States Barack Obama encouraging him "to
name Armenian massacre genocide" in his memory message. The experts
reminded the President that "in Your letter to the former President of
the U.S. George Bush dated on 18 March, 2005 You have encouraged him to
recognize Armenian Genocide", reports the Armenian Assembly of America.

"Recognizing Armenian Genocide You’ll prove that You are the leader You
have meant on 19 January, 2008, who tells the truth about the Armenian
Genocide and who says "no" to all other genocides," says the letter.

"President Obama’s visit to Turkey gives an exclusive opportunity to
touch upon this significant issue of human rights and to recover its
gaps," says the letter.