BAKU: Armenians May Provoke War Over Karabakh

ARMENIANS MAY PROVOKE WAR OVER KARABAKH

Day.Az
March 24 2010
Azerbaijan

About three years ago I was chatting with a military expert from a
country in the west who was an officer of an alliance of some kind,
not just an ordinary soldier, but someone who was certainly well
informed. He spent a long time complaining about "militarism". The
whole dreariness of the world community, which was supposedly
completely and utterly objective in its mediation and its desire to
resolve the Karabakh problem, was presented in all its glory.

We, of course, know that one of a journalist’s main qualities should
be to have an almost child-like curiosity. Looking at the expert
with all the innocence of the eyes of a 30-year old, I asked him:
"So, if there is going to be a war, who will win?" His reply came as
a surprise, even to me. He claimed that Azerbaijan had a minimum of
tens of thousands of assault troops (a precise number exists, but
I will maintain a discreet silence on that score), who are trained
at the highest level and could within two weeks reach the Armenian
border from the unoccupied part of Agdam or Fuzuli districts, unless,
of course, they were ordered to advance further. Let me repeat,
I am not talking about a regular army, but trained assault troops,
to whom it would not be appropriate to extend the principle "One at
altitude against five attackers from below".

I re-checked my companion’s information at official level. After the
usual silence it was later confirmed by independent experts and even
those who showed opposition at most to the authorities and at least
to the Defence Ministry.

I will not itemize all of Azerbaijan’s armaments and weaponry. It
was enough to have been in last year’s parade in Azadliq Square [in
Baku], but even then by no means everything was shown and not the
most terrible weapons. After all, the parade was for our benefit,
and not the Armenians. But recently I have come to understand the
hysteria of the Armenians with regard to "Azerbaijan’s bellicose
statements". But what can they do after all, the threat is a real,
a tangible one, so to speak.

Armenian war preparations

I wrote recently that the Armenians have been busy digging trenches in
Karabakh. Let me repeat, this information is 100-per cent accurate. An
Armenian counterpart, who has perfectly good eyesight, has seen this
new line of defence for himself. He said the reason for it was because
the Armenians are preparing to repel an attack, whereas I believe the
Armenians are preparing to de-occupy Azerbaijani territories. Whose
prediction will be proved true is a 50-50 question, but I would go
for mine.

The other day the [Armenian] Hraparak newspaper wrote that they
are busy preparing for war in Nagornyy Karabakh. It said that all
young people who had reached adulthood had already undergone medical
examinations, the basements of local hospitals had been cleared out
and beds laid out, first-aid medicines were being purchased and the
population was stocking up on food and water.

Those who agree with the idea of a forthcoming de-occupation believe
that the Armenian leaders are scaring all and sundry about a possible
war, so that if territories are returned the people can breathe easily:
the danger is over, peace is the main thing, is what they are saying.

More subtle specialists and near-experts believe that by declaring a
"patriotic war", in which not just the regular army will take part, but
the population as well, official Yerevan is covering up its inevitable
defeat should hostilities break out. The idea is that it would not be
[Armenian President Serzh] Sargsyan and the military junta as a whole
who would be defeated, but the whole nation. Another excuse for 95
years of mourning [since the 1915 Armenian genocide]?

They are tying to say that the Armenians are innocent, and all this
is the devilry of "cruel monsters" who beat the beautiful and the
misunderstood. So long as Sargsyan is in power a solution to the
conflict exists.

It was here that the experts analysing the "preparation for war"
apparently concluded their suppositions and restricted their
predictions. But I will venture to go further.

Not "hot air"

First, (proceeding from what has already been said), the Armenians do
have something and someone to fear. Azerbaijan’s "aggressive rhetoric"
is by no means just hot air. If they didn’t know, they wouldn’t be
afraid; if they weren’t afraid, they wouldn’t spread slander.

Secondly, at this precise moment we and the Armenians have reached the
crossroads: it’s either peace or war. We will decide this year. Time
is short.

Thirdly, aware of all this, the Armenian generals may turn to
provocation. We have always considered the option of a possible attack
by our troops on the occupying forces, but it is rare that anyone
contemplates the option of a strike from the other side. But it is a
real possibility. It cannot be ruled out that the Armenians will turn
to provocation. Of course, they are not guaranteed military success,
but the talks will be wrecked. And the junta, which has gorged itself
on a war, might choose this path, whether led by President Sargsyan
or without him.

Let us at least assume they will experiment. This very same officer
of the alliance claimed that within another week, that is a total of
three from the start of an attack, our troops could be in Yerevan. We
will speak about the CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization]
next time.

20 Scientists Commend The Role Armenians Play In Arab Economies

20 SCIENTISTS COMMEND THE ROLE ARMENIANS PLAY IN ARAB ECONOMIES

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.03.2010 19:04 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ 20 scientists from different countries attended the
3rd International Conference "Role of Armenians in the economies of
Arab countries" held on March 29 and 30 at the Centre for Armenian
Studies at Cairo University.

The conference was organized with support of the Cairo University’s
rector Proff.Hossam Kamel.

Conference participants were presented the congratulatory messages
from the Armenian Minister of Education and Science Armen Ashotyan
and Lebanese Minister of Industry Abraham Dedeyan.

The conference was attended by 20 scientists from Egypt, Syria,
Lebanon, the United States and Armenia. Reports of all scientists
focused on the role of Armenians in the economic development of Arab
countries. Speakers praised the role of Armenians in the development
of trade and economy in the Middle East. Conference proceedings will
be published in a book, the press office of the RA Ministry of Foreign
Affairs reported.

90 years Turks learnt to deny Armenian Genocide

news.am, Armenia
March 27 2010

90 years Turks learnt to deny Armenian Genocide

13:30 / 03/27/2010 Turkish Premier Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s words `show
that the he has no sensitivity on the subject matter,’ reads the
article by Cengiz Aktar in Turkish Hurriyet Daily News. The author
comments on Erdogan’s explanations about his statement on deportation
of 100.000 illegal Armenians. Aktar notes that Armenians lived in
Anatolia even before Turks, adding that within 90 years Turks
(including Erdogan) were taught to deny killing of Anatolian
Armenians.

`No matter how you name it, this is not normal. So if nobody knows
anything today, it is in a way understandable, however unacceptable,’
he reckons.

According to the author, the word `illegal’ stirred up debates inside
and outside Turkey as presently the migration is a topical issue,
particularly in western countries. This subject is studied at various
universities, including those in Europe. `Almost every day a dramatic
story about illegal workers, including those from Turkey, are covered
in Western newspapers,’ he added. Thus, Aktar regrets that Turkish
Premier is unaware of it and `rudely talks on the BBC radio about the
arbitrary practices of his own country.’

SDHP Stamp Issue in Court

SDHP STAMP ISSUE IN COURT

13:40:39 – 25/03/2010
ahos17292.html

The topic of the SDHP split is again in the center of the attention in
connection with the trial to be held on April 1 where the SDHP leader
Lyudmila Sargsyan’s being the party leader will be decided as well as
the issue of the party’s stamp.

A SDHP member, supporter of Lyudmila Sargsyan, former deputy minister
of National Security Gurgen Yeghiazaryan said in this connection that
during a session of the party, last September, he was asked not to
participate because the question of leaving the opposition and joining
the government was to be discussed. The couple Sedrak Ajemyan and
Vardan Khachatyran did not manage to reach their goal. Afterwards, by
the description of Gurgen Yeghiazaryan, they formed a cooperative
structure and appealed to the court.

Yeghiazaryan, unlike Lyudmila Sargsyan, is not an optimist and thinks
the court decision will not be in their favor.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-lr

President’s proposal to sign agreement on non-use of force shows…

Armenian President’s proposal to sign an agreement on non-use of force
once more showed the world who is threatening regional peace

2010-03-26 16:49:00

Interview of Masis Mailyan, Chairman of Foreign Policy and Security
Public Council, ex-deputy foreign minister of the Nagorny Karabakh
Republic, with ArmInfo news agency

Mr. Mailyan, how perspective is further promotion of H.Res.252 on the
Armenian Genocide? And what do you expect from President Obama’s
traditional speech on April 24?

It is obvious that by affirming the Armenian Genocide resolutions, the
United States and some Western countries exert pressure on Turkey,
which is trying to evade implementing the assumed commitments on
normalization of relations with Armenia. Promotion of H.Res.252, as
well as making new decisions by the two countries’ parliaments and the
extent of sincerity of President Obama’s speech to be made on April 24
depend on how much adequate the Turkish leadership will behave. On the
other hand, taking into account the domestic processes in the Turkish
society and the situation in the Turkish army, considerable
intensification of the pressure on Ankara may lead to destabilization
of the situation. Therefore, further decisions on Turkey will be taken
with due regard for these and other circumstances. As regards
ratification of Armenian-Turkish Protocols, this topic cannot be
considered completely closed.

Baku is constantly stating about some mythical soon settlement of the
Karabakh conflict. Can one speak of any terms of settlement today and
how do you imagine this taking into account the current realities?

If we are stemming from the methodology of settlement applied by the
OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen, and as a result – the Madrid proposals
of the intermediaries, the negotiating positions of the parties, the
distorted negotiating format, we may say that in this form the
negotiating process and reaching compromise have no prospect. But in
case of new approaches application and changing of international
parameters of settlement, the conflict may be resolved in a short
period of time. Compromise is possible if Russia, the USA and EU
countries give new quality to Nagorny Karabakh settlement process via
recognition of the NKR statehood. Only then the parties will be able
to agree on peaceful and even kind neighborly relations on equal
conditions. Only using of the recent precedents of Kosovo, Abkhazia
and South Ossetia by the international community for resolving of the
Karabakh conflict may prevent a new war and will guarantee regional
security and create the needed conditions for reaching strong peace as
soon as possible.

In an interview with Euronews, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan
offered Baku to sign an agreement on non-use of force. In response,
Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry Spokesman Elkhan Polukhov said that Baku
is ready to sign the agreement on non-use of force only after
"deoccupation of the Azerbaijani territories’. How much does this
approach meet the renewed Madrid principles of the Karabakh peace
process, which rules out any use of force and is positively
characterized by Azerbaijan?

The Armenian President’s proposal to sign an agreement on non-use of
force once more showed the world who is threatening peace and security
in the region. Baku’s refusal showed that danger is actually not in
the existence of the conflict that does not hinder active development
of Azerbaijan and foreign investments in economy of that country, but
it is in the political ambitions of the Azerbaijani leadership. In
addition, Azerbaijan showed how easily it can neglect the commitments
it undertook when joining the UN, CSCE (OSCE) and the Council of
Europe. The basic documents of those commitments imply peaceful
resolution of disputes, non- use of force or threat of force. Even if
leave aside the NKR security problem, the territories fixed in the NKR
Constitution, etc., the talks about "de-occupation of the Azerbaijani
territories" or withdrawal of our troops beyond the line of the
"internationally recognized Azerbaijani borders" are inappropriate, as
these borders have not been determined at the international level.
Official Baku often makes reference to the international recognition
of the Republic of Azerbaijan within the "internationally recognized
borders", being voluntarily interpreted by it in its favor, that does
not meet the reality.

According to the world practice, the issue of territorial delimitation
among the neighboring states may be solved by the states themselves,
or these states may delegate the authorities on determination of
borders to a neutral mediator. A separate person, country, group of
countries or a special international conference may be a mediator.
Such issues in our regions are solved by the countries themselves.
Despite the fact the Republic of Azerbaijan was internationally
recognized for about 18 years, the process of delimitation and
demarcation of the Azerbaijani-Georgian border, Azerbaijani-Russian
border, Azerbaijani-Iranian sea border is still going on and
disputable sections remain with Turkmenistan in the water area of the
Caspian Sea. The process of determination of borders between
Azerbaijan and the NKR, Azerbaijan and Armenia did not start at all
because of the absence of diplomatic relations and an
intergovernmental commission on delimitation and demarcation of
interstate borders between these countries.

Ilham Aliyev has recently said that the main part of the negotiations
on the Karabakh conflict is over. Does this statement contain truth,
besides traditional populism?

The OSCE MG Co-Chairs stress that consultations between Armenia and
Azerbaijan as part of the Madrid process are conducted on the
principle of "nothing is agreed until everything is agreed’. Taking
into consideration the mutually exclusive and sometimes insulting
statements by officials from Baku and Yerevan, it is very difficult to
trust in the latest statement by Ilham Aliyev.

Interviewed by David Stepanyan, 26 March 2010, ArmInfo

RA Government Endorsed Iraqi Armenians’ Integration Concept

RA GOVERNMENT ENDORSED IRAQI ARMENIANS’ INTEGRATION CONCEPT

news.am, Armenia
March 25 2010

RA Government approved concept on integration of Iraqi Armenians in
Armenia at the March 25 sitting.

Concept refers to 750 Iraqi Armenians who left the country due to
intolerance towards Christians by extremists during the war, RA
Government press service informed NEWS.am.

RA Premier Tigran Sargsyan noted that all organizations should assist
smooth integration of these families into society.

Armenian community of Iraq presently totals 15.000 people residing
in Baghdad, Kirkuk, Basra and Mosul cities. At the rough estimate,
about 2.000-2.500 Armenians left Iraq since the hostilities in the
country aroused.

As many as 1.960 Christians were killed in Iraq in 2003-2009.

Presently, the number of Christians in Iraq is about 500 000.

BAKU: Nagorno Karabakh Will Never Be Independent, Ilham Aliyev

NAGORNO KARABAKH WILL NEVER BE INDEPENDENT, ILHAM ALIYEV

news.az
March 24 2010
Azerbaijan

President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev made a speech during festivities
on Novruz holiday.

The resolution of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno
Karabakh is the most important problem facing us. Definite steps
are taken in this direction and today Azerbaijan’s positions in the
negotiation process are much stronger. Certainly, our diplomatic
efforts have played their role in strengthening these positions.

Meanwhile, the processes of construction and development, ongoing
in Azerbaijan and consolidation of the country have strengthened
our positions in the negotiation process. Today we are the most
economically developed country of the region and our development
cannot be compared to the development of other countries.

All these factors consolidate our positions during negotiations
and we lay hope for the negotiation process, and we must
continue these efforts. Today we are on the decisive stage of
the conflict settlement. It is possible to say that the main part
of the negotiations has almost been completed. I can say that the
introduced proposals with some small exceptions ensure the interests of
Azerbaijan, its territorial integrity, return of all occupied regions
under Azerbaijan’s control. Thus, we consider that if the opposite
party demonstrates constructivism and agrees to the proposed variant,
we will further advance in the issue of the conflict settlement.

We have not stepped a bit back from our principal position in the
process of negotiations. We said this several years ago and we adhere
to the same position today. The territorial integrity of Azerbaijan
has never been a subject of discussion. The territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan must be restored. The occupational troops must be withdrawn
from all the occupied lands and the Azerbaijani citizens must return
there. All communications must open. Armenians and Azerbaijanis living
in Nagorno Karabakh who must return to Nagorno Karabakh must live
in conditions of high autonomy. The future that can happen either
tomorrow or in a hundred years or may never happen will show the
nature of this status.

This means that independence of Nagorno Karabakh beyond Azerbaijan
is absolutely unacceptable. This is our principal position. Nagorno
Karabakh will never be independent. Azerbaijan will never recognize
it. The world community will also not recognize the formation that
has not been recognized by us.

I think today there are good opportunities for the resolution of
the issue. Azerbaijan will intensify diplomatic efforts, it takes
a constructive position during negotiations and at the same time it
uses its potential to strengthen. This consolidation is observed in
the economic, political and military sphere. We do not conceal it. We
live in conditions of war. It is not by accident that a greater part
of our state expenses goes for defence. This is natural. There will be
no need for large defence costs after the Karabakh conflict is settled.

But today there is a strong need for that. We will raise our defence
costs every year, strengthen army, purchase new arms and do so that
the armed forces of Azerbaijan could fulfil the order of the Supreme
Commander within a short period of time and at any minute. This is
our sovereign right and we do not need advisers in this issue.

It has already been twenty years that we live in conditions
of independence. The first years of independence were hard and
complicated. We managed to attain the current realities merely through
our own efforts and by holding the policy of our great leader Heydar
Aliyev without any assistance and advises from outside. Thanks
to the progressive reforms both in political and economic sphere
Azerbaijan has already turned into a strong state. If we need advise,
we will appeal to whom we need. But there is no need for untimely
recommendations. Those who want to interfere with our internal
affairs should have understood long before that their efforts are in
vain and useless. There can be only one result here: the relations
between Azerbaijan and those who want to interfere with our internal
affairs may deteriorate. We are ready for any relations. We want to
build our relations with all countries on the basis of principles of
friendship, mutual respect and non-interference. We do not interfere
with anyone’s internal affairs, we do not criticize anyone, though
in some cases there are sufficient grounds for criticism. Certainly,
we expect the same attitude to us.

Therefore, I do not want the situation to worsen to the extend when
we were obliged to settle issues with someone in an extremely serious
and strained form.

On this remarkable day I would like to repeat that Azerbaijan follows
its own way. This is a way of democracy, development, progress,
freedom and sovereignty. We must follow this way together with our
friends. But we cannot follow this way with those who want to blacken
us or interfere with our affairs.

We rely on our own potential and we live well. And we will live even
better. Our current success is based on the will, determination and
talent of the Azerbaijani people. Today, on this great day, I would
like to say addressing to the Azerbaijani people that as a President of
the country I will continue the independent policy of Azerbaijan and
will never give up this way. We will further do everything possible
for the successful future of Azerbaijan.

ARF To RP

ARF TO RP

Lragir.am
22/03/10

March 22, reporters asked ARF parliamentary member Artsvik Minasyan
his opinion about the possibilities for Nagorno-Karabakh participation
in the NKR issue negotiation about which the OSCE Minsk group French
co-chair Bernard Fassier stated recently in Yerevan. Reporters asked
Artsvik Minasyan whether he agrees with the statement of a number
of governmental members as well as Fassier himself, that Karabakh
was pushed out of the negotiation process only "thanks" to Robert
Kocharyan’s efforts whom the ARF has supported for 10 years.

Artsvik Minasyan called the statement on the participation of Karabakh
opportunistic, but the Armenian side should continue to fight for
its participation, and Armenia is obliged to conclude a strategic
documentary alliance with Karabakh.

As for the "merits" of Kocharyan, Artsvik Minasyan believes this
is some kind of misunderstanding. ARF considers that in the sense
of protecting the rights of Karabakh, it is not eliminated from the
process. The point, says Minasyan, is about who should represent the
interests of Karabakh, and this role assumed Robert Kocharyan.

Minasyan reminded the ruling Republican Party once supported Robert
Kocharyan too, and very strange that they are trying to create the
impression that Karabakh is pushed out of the process because of
Kocharyan.

Azerbaijan In Fact Recognized

AZERBAIJAN IN FACT RECOGNIZED

rahos17236.html
10:56:54 – 22/03/2010

Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia Shavarsh Kocharyan
answered a "Mediamax" question in connection with a number of
statements of the Azerbaijani president.

"Mr. Aliyev announced another monologue about nonexistent dialogue.

According to the monologue, Azerbaijan essentially completed
negotiations with itself and something that it reached, in general,
is in the interests of Azerbaijan. However, with some exceptions,
perhaps, it cannot agree with itself", said Shavarsh Kocharyan.

Baku pretends not to understand the lack of any alternative to the
independence of Nagorno-Karabakh – either now or in hundred years,
or ever. Nagorno-Karabakh Republic took place in full accordance
with international law, the State, which managed to resist the policy
of ethnic cleansing and aggression of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan, being
forced to sign a truce with the Nagorno-Karabakh, in fact recognized
the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh in 1994", said Deputy Minister
of Foreign Affairs of Armenia.

According to Kocharyan, the statements of President Aliyev are direct
evidence of reluctance to engage in constructive dialogue to resolve
the conflict. Azerbaijan continues to inflate the bubble of illusions
arising from sitting on the oil needle, distortions of the nature of
the problem, the causes of conflict and the negotiation process.

Azerbaijan has the opportunity to withdraw its troops from the
occupied territories of Nagorno-Karabakh and to begin negotiations with
Nagorno Karabakh before this excessively bloated bubble of illusions,
distortions, and smug bragging bursts", said the Foreign Ministry
of Armenia.

Recall that Aliyev said that the settlement has entered a crucial
phase, and they hope that the conflict will be resolved within the
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-l

‘100 Steps’ Is Theoretical: Razmik Zohrabyan On Opposition’s Program

‘100 STEPS’ IS THEORETICAL: RAZMIK ZOHRABYAN ON OPPOSITION’S PROGRAM FOR REFORM

Tert.am
22.03.10

Republican Party of Armenia (HHK) has not held a special discussion
on ‘100 Steps,’ a program authored by former RA prime minister Hrant
Bagratyan, said HHK Deputy Chair Razmik Zohrabyan at a press conference
today, adding that he had, however, flipped through the document.

Zohrabyan said the program prepared by the opposition is a theoretical
one.

"At first glance, the program seems to be normal, but you cannot say
anything [sure] unless you put it into practice … As soon as they
[Armenian National Congress] assume leadership – I don’t know when
that’ll happen – they can implement their program," said Zohrabyan.

Asked whether he thought it possible that the opposition might return
to power, he said: "In a democratic country every political power
that gets public backing assumes authority. It is not excluded that
they can return to power. Elections are expected in two years, let
them try and we will see [what happens]," said Zohrabyan.

He also commented on a statement by the Armenian National Congress
on early elections, saying if the ANC wants to come into the
constitutional field it must do so through constitutional means.

Zohrabyan also said that there aren’t any threats to the Constitution.

On the other hand, according to Zohrabyan, the opposition has started
preparing for not extraordinary, but simply the next elections.