EU in Kosovo Says Turk, Israeli Trafficked Organs

EU in Kosovo Says Turk, Israeli Trafficked Organs
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
June 13, 2011 at 4:08 PM ET

PRISTINA, Kosovo (AP) – A European Union prosecutor in Kosovo has
indicted a Turkish and an Israeli national for involvement in an
international network that falsely promised poor people money for
their kidneys and then transplanted the organs into rich buyers, the
bloc’s rule of law mission said Monday.

Turkish citizen Yusuf Sonmez, and Israel’s Moshe Harel were charged
last week for “trafficking in persons, organized crime and unlawful
exercise of medical activity,” the mission, known as EULEX, said in a
statement.

Sonmez and Harel are considered at large by EU authorities and
Interpol has issued a warrant for their arrest.

The indictments are part of a larger investigation into allegations
that an organized criminal group conducted operations in a clinic
outside of the capital Pristina where the victims’ organs were
transplanted into the buyers.

EU prosecutor Jonathan Ratel – who brought the charges in 2010 – said
victims were promised up to $20,000 (euro14,000) for their kidneys,
but were never paid, while recipients were required to pay between
euro80,000 and euro100,000 euros ($115,000-$143,000).

The victims came from Moldova, Kazakhstan, Russia and Turkey, and
lived in “extreme poverty or acute financial distress,” EULEX said.

Kosovo law forbids the removal and transplant of organs.

The case was brought to the attention of authorities in 2008 when
Kosovo police acted upon information from a Turkish national who said
his kidney had been stolen.

Since then seven Kosovars, including doctors and a senior official in
the Health Ministry, have been charged and are standing trial.

Sonmez and Harel were indicted separately after EU investigators
located Harel in Israel and an EU prosecutor interviewed Sonmez in
Turkey earlier this year. Harel was detained in 2008, but later
allowed to leave Kosovo upon the promise of return pending legal
proceedings.

Death in London: Distinct flavour of Calcutta’s fading colonial phas

The Cacutta Telegraph, India
June 20 2011

A DEATH IN LONDON

– The distinct flavour of Calcutta’s fading colonial phase

by Ashok Mitra

The small news item, with a London dateline, was missed by most
newspapers in the country, including those based in Calcutta. Joe
Galibardy, the rage of Calcutta hockey in the pre-World War II decades
and right half-back in Dhyan Chand’s victorious team in the 1936
Olympics, died on May 17 last. He had migrated to England in 1956 and
settled in a London suburb; he was 96.

Memory is a stock of joint supplies. The very mention of Joe Galibardy
chokes the corridors of the mind with a harum-scarum procession of
other exotic-sounding names: Tapsell, Carr, Furtado, Carvalho,
Carapiet, suchlike; these names spelled the hockey season in Calcutta
in the 1930s. Field hockey in that era was almost unknown in the rest
of the world. It was the pastime of British colonials of the lesser
breed who had come out on business or on a job to South Asia. The
caste system was pronounced among these expatriates: the top layers of
the ruling class in Calcutta, if not privileged to be the seat of the
imperial administration, still the hub of major mercantile activities.
The city’s all-white crème de la crème had cricket and tennis as their
preferred modes of relaxation. They used to congregate in two or three
hoity-toity clubs in which membership was severely restricted. Those
belonging to the subordinate species among the expatriates, even if of
pure British stock, had to look for a different address. That went for
other offal like Anglo-Indians, Jews – whether of Caucasian or other
lineage – and descendents of the heterogeneity arriving in the
previous two centuries from near and distant foreign shores in search
of a living in the burgeoning second city of the empire. All such
species trooped into either the Dalhousie Club or a sporting body
sponsored by this or that profession or service group. Hockey in
Calcutta was for a long while dominated by four clubs, with a riot of
ethnic diversity in their roll of members – Calcutta Customs, Calcutta
Port Commissioners, Bengal Nagpur Railway, the Rangers. A round robin
league competition under the aegis of the Bengal Hockey Association
took up most of the season. It had the format of teams distributed
over a hierarchy of three or four divisions and providing for both
promotion and relegation, depending on the performance of the clubs.
While the Jhansi Heroes, shepherded by Dhyan Chand and his brother,
Roop Singh, shone in lonely splendour in that regimental establishment
in the far interior of the country, Indian hockey was really the story
of the Calcutta and Bombay outfits. Bombay had that dazzlingly
marvellous team, the Lusitanians, with its bevy of Fernandeses and
D’Mellos. Both the Lusitanians and the Jhansi Heroes would visit
Calcutta to take part in the Beighton Cup tournament that followed the
hockey league fixtures. Excitement would run high.

Admittedly, this excitement had a specificity. It was confined to
stray sections of the sports-crazy clientele of the city. Hockey as a
sports event involved substantially greater outlay than the ubiquitous
football called for; the lay Bengali kept generally aloof from it.
Interest in hockey grew only in the wake of the stunning exploits of
Dhyan Chand and his team-mates in successive Olympics; patriotic
emotions would swell at the flimsiest opportunity in those otherwise
glum and dull colonial days. Even so, the passion of those who crowded
the few galleries in the Calcutta Maidan swirled mostly around
football. The out-of-the-blue annexation of the Indian Football
Association Shield by the goody-goody Bengali team, Mohun Bagan, by
defeating a British regimental team in 1911 – exactly a century ago –
spurred further their sectarian passion for football.

The natives, anyway, maintained some distance from hockey. At the
other end, to the upper- crust expatriate establishment groups too,
the game was non-U; they continued with cricket and, of course,
tennis. Hockey was for their menials. The city police commissioner,
for instance, would relax on indolent late autumn afternoons serving
gentle lobs in a mixed doubles on the lawns of the sprawling
Ballygunge Sports Club; the wife of the joint commissioner would be
his partner. The police sergeants, although very often pure-breed
English or Scot or Welsh, would find it awfully difficult to gain
entry into this exclusive club; they sauntered to either the Dalhousie
Club or that shelter of last resort, the Calcutta Police Club, sulked
and played hockey. In contrast, the heterogeneous mix of the Eurasian
underclass who succeeded in wrangling jobs in the railways or customs
or the office of the Calcutta Port Commissioners or in the forest
ranges of Bengal, Bihar, Assam and Orissa – Anglo-Indians,
Anglo-Portuguese, Anglo-Italian, Anglo-Dutch, native Christians,
Goans, Jews, Armenians of other hues, Parsis – suffered from no
inhibition. They took in good grace their inferior ranking and
exclusion from the elite clubs and joyfully concentrated on hockey.
Nimble on their feet, with a flair for dribbling the ball with their
sticks, and possessing an eerie skill in converting short corners into
goals, they lorded over the game. The leading teams took their turn to
win the annual league championship, and it was carnival time when the
Beighton Cup tourney commenced in late April. The hockey season was
breathlessly short, but crowded. Along with the Jhansi Heroes and the
Lusitanians, there would also be a number of other out-station teams
participating in the Beighton.

A pot pourri of wide-ranging surnames crammed the sports page in the
hockey season, apart from Galibardy and Tapsell, other ones, like
Costello, Carapiet, Lazarus, Surita, Pinto, Bannister, Bareto,
D’Costa, and, of course, Lumsden. The three Lumsden brothers in the
Rangers Club played hockey, cricket, football, tennis. One team
playing in the hockey league was the Armenian Club, chock-full of
members of the Jewish community. Armenian merchants for a long time
had a near-monopoly of the city’s real estate business; they loved
hockey. Their scions did courses at St. Xavier’s College till as late
as the fag end of the 1940s, when some of them drifted into Utpal
Dutt’s Little Theatre Group. To go back to the not too remote past,
Siegfried Sassoon, the World War I poet, was of Calcutta Jewish stock.
So were the Cohens, one of whom, decades later, joined the Communist
Party of India and stayed with it for quite a while. That heritage is
totally lost.

The fate of the Armenians has been no different from that of the other
ethnic group which contributed so sumptuously to Calcutta’s hockey.
Galibardy, who had quietly migrated to England more than
half-a-century ago, has emerged as a news item only on the occasion of
his death. Nobody knows what happened to the Tapsell and Carvalho
families and to the rest of the lot. The extraordinary churning of
ethnic diversity that marked the city’s fading colonial phase had a
flavour of its own. Does not this slice of social history cry out to
be researched?

To be fair, the cricket teams too would now and then spring a
surprise. The Calcutta Cricket Club was snobbish to the core. Its
skipper for more than a decade, A.L. Hosie, had impeccable managing
agency background. His successor, T.C. Longfield – now a minor
footnote in cricket annals because Ted Dexter, Test captain of England
in a later period, married his daughter – was equally high caste. But
Calcutta CC’s long-time opening batsman was one Behrendt, a
nondescript half-Dutch, a lefty, stockily build, who would routinely
despatch the first ball he faced to the boundary for a four. Another
prominent member of the team had a surname which was Flemish all over,
Van der Gutch, even as a Pugsley, supposedly of mixed
Burmese-Irish-Portuguese descent, became a Calcutta football hero in
the same period.

Did Joe Galibardy – or, for the matter, Charlie Tapsell – deserve a
biography? Who knows? Or is it a case of who cares? Cultural
anthropologists can have a lovely intra-mural debate on the issue.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110620/jsp/opinion/story_14104252.jsp

Expert: Armenian president left doors half open for opposition

news.am, Armenia
june 20 2011

Expert: Armenian president left doors half open for opposition

June 18, 2011 | 20:05

YEREVAN. – Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan responded to opposition
Armenian National Congress leaving the door for negotiations half
opened. Thus, he said `yes’ to dialogue with ANC but excluded the
early elections point from dialogue agenda, said political analyst
Yervand Bozoyan to Armenian News-NEWS.am.

He emphasized that President Sargsyan intentionally left the door half
open, so that ANC could enter into it.

`And, certainly, ANC will go into it, it will certainly continue the
dialogue with authorities because it is already deeply involved in the
process and does not possess the necessary political recourse to make
a step back,’ added the expert

He noted that authorities initiated the dialogue process with a sole
purpose of weakening ANC and, in the long run, they achieved the set
goal. Bozoyan said that the incumbent president has rich experience in
this context.

`Once Serzh Sargsyan diminished opposition National Unity party led by
Artashes Geghamyan through a dialogue process. In 2008 he weakened
Orinats Yerkir party led by Arthur Baghdasaryan in a similar way,’
concluded the expert.

Byurakan observatory to host seminar dedicated to Anania Shirakatsi

Byurakan observatory to host seminar dedicated to Anania Shirakatsi

June 19, 2011 – 15:15 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – By decision of the Armenian government and UNESCO,
2012 will be declared the year the prominent Armenian mathematician,
astronomer and geographer, Anania Shirakatsi, to honor his 1400th
birthday.

The main event of the year will be a scientific conference to be held
at Armenia’s Byurakan observatory, which will focus of Shirakatsi’s
astrological works as well as the country’s astrological monuments.

As preparation for the event, Byurakan observatory will host a seminar
on July 12-13, 2011, on the initiative of professor Hrach Martirosyan
of Leiden University.

Armenian musicians to perform at Rudaki Symphony Orchestra concert

Armenian musicians to perform at Rudaki Symphony Orchestra concert in Tehran

June 19, 2011 – 17:53 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – The Rudaki Symphony Orchestra will give its first
public performance at Tehran’s Vahdat Hall on June 20 and 21.

The orchestra was established in February by the Rudaki Foundation, a
nongovernmental artistic and cultural institution.

A wide repertoire of Iranian compositions is scheduled to be performed
during the concerts. Twelve Armenian musicians will join the orchestra
for the concerts, which will be conducted by Arash Amini, Tehran Times
reported.

Sakharov’s widow Yelena Bonner dies at 88 in U.S. – media

Sakharov’s widow Yelena Bonner dies at 88 in U.S. – media

Yelena Bonner, a human rights activist and the widow of the late
Soviet dissident and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Andrei Sakharov

MOSCOW, June 19 (RIA Novosti)

Yelena Bonner, a human rights activist and the widow of the late
Soviet dissident and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Andrei Sakharov, died
in the U.S. at the age of 88, Ekho Moskvy radio station reported on
Sunday.

Bonner died on Saturday in Boston after a grave illness, the radio
station said, referring to human rights activist Pavel Litvinov and
the Pyotr Grigorenko Fund.

Bonner’s daughter Tatiana Yankelevich said that her mother would be
buried in Moscow.

“We announce with deep sorrow that our mother Yelena Georgiyevna
Bonner died today, on June 18 at 13:55 (17:55 GMT). According to her
will, her body will be cremated and the cinerary urn will be buried at
the Vostryakovo cemetery in Moscow next to her husband, mother and
brother,” Yankelevich said in a statement.

Sakharov was a Soviet nuclear physicist and an advocate of civil
liberties and reforms in the Soviet Union. He was awarded the Nobel
Peace Prize in 1975.

Be a Detachment Leader for 1 Week in Shushi, Karabakh

Be a Detachment Leader for 1 Week in Shushi, Karabakh

06.18.2011 17:16
epress.am

>From Aug. 3-10, in the city of Shushi, the European Movement in
Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) is organizing a summer school for 15
students from Nagorno-Karabakh high schools. At the summer school,
those who want will have the opportunity to be a detachment leader.

Organizers will cover transportation, food and accommodation for participants.

`With much anticipation, we wait for all those engaged people who
might make the students’ routine interesting and useful. We
particularly need such specialists who will suggest interesting
methods for organizing entertainment,’ reads the press statement by
the group.

Will they look into Serzh Sargsyan’s eyes?

Will they look into Serzh Sargsyan’s eyes?

07:20 pm | June 17, 2011 | Politics

Political scientist Levon Shirinyan says Serzh Sargsyan and Ilham
Aliyev will be presented with an agreement on the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict resolution in Kazan, but is rest assured that neither will
sign it.

“If the resolution states territorial integrity, that doesn’t favor
Armenia. If it will be a document on principles, I don’t think Serzh
Sargsyan will sign,” Mr. Shirinyan told “A1+”.
The political scientist views the presentation of a document from the
psychological angle. “They can present the document to check the
sides’ reactions, even by looking into their eyes.”
As for Azerbaijan’s recent belligerent declarations claiming that the
process must be accelerated, the political scientist said:

“I don’t believe either side. The Armenian authorities say Armenia
will sign, if Azerbaijan signs. However, Azerbaijan will only sign
under a document that is not in the interests of Armenia or Artsakh,
and Armenia won’t sign that document. So, nothing will work out.”

The political scientist sees the enlargement of clear-cut,
well-organized war propaganda. “There is pressure from the
international community on both sides.
Levon Shirinyan says Armenia’s situation is absurd. “An army that won
the war is speaking as one that is defending itself. This signifies a
psychological defeat and is very dangerous.”

The political scientists says what Armenia needs to do now is to
present the essence of the NK conflict correctly. “This is a conflict
between the Republic of Artsakh and the Turkish state of Azerbaijan,
and that conflict has been solved from the military angle. What we
need to do is formulate.”

Shirinyan considers the view that conflicts are not resolved without
mutual concessions absurd, including in the case of the NK conflict.

“This is a manifestation of the Armenian-Turkish conflict where there
are no concessions, particularly on the part of Turkey. Throughout the
past 200 years, especially after the genocide, the Turks have not made
any concession and there cannot be any discussion on the return of our
lost lands. Who has given land without a war? This is a national
liberation struggle, a sacred act. We must work together and show the
world that the right to territorial integrity may not be above the
right of nations to self-determination. The right of nations to
self-determination is a much higher value; otherwise, the United
States would remain a colony of England to this day and there wouldn’t
be any French Revolution. It is inadmissible to speak about returning
a piece of land.”

The political scientist emphasized that Azerbaijani snipers take the
lives of Armenian soldiers before each meeting of the presidents and
Armenian snipers should give an adequate response to their opponents.

http://www.a1plus.am/en/politics/2011/06/17/levon-shirinyan

Opposition’s ultimatums are impermissible – Sargsyan

Interfax, Russia
June 17 2011

Opposition’s ultimatums are impermissible – Sargsyan

YEREVAN. June 17

Opposition’s ultimatums are impermissible – Sargsyan
Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan is ready for a dialog with the
opposition but finds the ultimatums from the opposition Armenian
National Congress impermissible.

“We have always been open to and ready for any discussion. And if
there are political forces that have concrete and reasonable proposals
we are ready for concrete decisions,” he said with regards to the
proposal of leader of the congress and former President Levon
Ter-Petrosian.

“From this point of view the most important principle is clear –
ultimatums are impermissible. To speak with each other in a language
of ultimatums is a style of action leading nowhere. The attempts to
transform the dialog into negotiations are simply unacceptable,”
Sargsyan said.

“If instead of unacceptable talks the Armenian National Congress is
really ready to continue a dialog on a broad range of key issues
concerning the development path of the country, the home and foreign
policies, and if it wishes to achieve this not only through specific
appointments, then representatives of coalition parties may sit down
to the table of discussion. The political coalition is ready for such
discussions with all political forces that have concrete proposals,”
he said.

“All other ways are fraught with serious dangers and unavoidable
losses,” he said.

At a March 31 rally, Ter-Petrosian supported talks with the
authorities on holding early presidential and parliamentary elections.

ml eb

Hopes and fears rise in Karabakh conflict

Al-Arabiya , UAE
June 18 2011

Hopes and fears rise in Karabakh conflict

Saturday, 18 June 2011

Hopes have been raised of progress towards a peace deal to end the
long-running stand-off between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorny
Karabakh, but analysts warn that a return to war is also possible.

There has been speculation ahead of talks between the Armenian and
Azerbaijani presidents on June 25 in the Russian city of Kazan that
the bitter enemies could sign a `basic principles’ agreement — a
small step on a long road to a settlement of the dispute over the
mountainous region.

But 17 years after the ceasefire that ended all-out hostilities,
tensions have risen again with regular firefights along the Karabakh
frontline and repeated threats from Baku to seize the region back by
force if talks don’t yield results.

In response, the ethnic Armenian forces who have controlled Karabakh
since the war and their backers in Yerevan have threatened large-scale
retaliation if Baku takes military action.

`This is not a `frozen conflict;’ it is actually smouldering,’ said
Thomas de Waal, a Caucasus expert at the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace in Washington. `The level of the rhetoric makes
war more possible and the danger is that, at some point, words could
become deeds.’

Energy-rich Azerbaijan, flush with oil and gas money, has massively
increased military spending, and a report from the International
Crisis Group think tank earlier this year warned that an arms build-up
and clashes on the frontline could lead to renewed fighting.

The conflict in the 1990s killed some 30,000 people and forced around
a million more from their homes.

A return to war could threaten important pipelines which pass close to
Karabakh, taking Caspian Sea oil and gas from Azerbaijan to Europe,
and even involve neighboring powers like Turkey, which supports Baku
over Karabakh, and Russia, which has troops stationed in Armenia.

`The scenario could get very ugly — energy pipelines could be
considered fair game, you could have a huge refugee exodus and the
danger is that Turkey and Russia could be dragged in,’ said Lawrence
Sheets, Caucasus project director at the International Crisis Group.

A statement issued by the US, Russian and French presidents at the G8
summit last month put pressure on both countries to `move beyond the
unacceptable status quo’ and `take a decisive step towards a peaceful
settlement.’

`We strongly urge the leaders of the sides to prepare their
populations for peace, not war,’ the statement said.

It urged them to sign a `basic principles’ document that envisages an
Armenian withdrawal from areas around Karabakh also seized during the
war, the return of refugees, international security guarantees, and a
decision on the final status of the territory at an unspecified point
in the future.

Officials in both countries said they had come closer to resolving
differences over the document ahead of the talks this month, although
they continued to express suspicions about the other’s motives.

`I’ve seen some very hostile statements from both sides and nothing to
suggest that some sort of breakthrough is on the horizon,’ said Mr.
Sheets.

Even if the document is signed, huge obstacles to a peace deal remain.

Azerbaijan insists that Karabakh must remain part of its sovereign
territory, albeit with widespread autonomy, while Armenia says it must
never return to Baku’s control.

The ethnic Armenian authorities who now control the region say that
they too should have a seat at the negotiating table, although Baku
regards them as illegitimate.

Karabakh remains a highly emotive issue in both Azerbaijan and
Armenia, where enmity is constantly stoked by official rhetoric and
media reports.

`No one (in Armenia) believes that Nagorny Karabakh can be handed over
to Azerbaijan,’ said Manvel Sarkisian of the Armenian Centre for
Strategic and National Studies. `They believe that Karabakh should be
recognised as an independent state or joined with Armenia.’

In Azerbaijan however it is considered absolutely unthinkable for the
region to be allowed to secede.

`Azerbaijan’s position is clear — territorial integrity cannot be a
subject for discussion,’ said foreign ministry spokesman Elkhan
Polukhov. `This position has the unequivocal support of the
Azerbaijani public.’

No country in the world, even Armenia, has recognized Karabakh as
independent from Azerbaijan, but while Baku says that its sovereignty
must be maintained, Yerevan says that the people now living in the
disputed region must have the right to self-determination.

Negotiations mediated by the Organization for Security and Cooperation
in Europe have continued since the 1990s without significant progress,
and Mr. De Waal said that a basic principles agreement would represent
a `huge commitment to embark on a serious peace process.’

But he cautioned that the document would not signal an end to the conflict.

`It’s important to stress that this is only a framework, a road map to
a peace treaty — not a final settlement,’ he said.

http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/06/18/153786.html