Armenia – EC finds conscientious objector wrongfully convicted,

FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway

The right to believe, to worship and witness
The right to change one’s belief or religion
The right to join together and express one’s belief

===============================================
Thursday 7 July 2011
ARMENIA: EUROPEAN COURT FINDS CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR WAS WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED AND JAILED – BUT WHAT WILL GOVERNMENT DO?

The European Court of Human Rights has today (7 July) published a Grand
Chamber judgment finding that Armenia violated Vahan Bayatyan’s right to
freedom of thought, conscience and religion violated. Bayatyan, an Armenian
Jehovah’s Witness, was imprisoned from September 2002 to July 2003 for
refusal on grounds of conscience to perform compulsory military service.
Armenia currently has 69 prisoners of conscience – all Jehovah’s Witnesses
– in jail for refusing conscription. Armenian officials gave only cautious
responses to the verdict to Forum 18 News Service, but the Jehovah’s
Witnesses noted to Forum 18 that it should both lead to the prisoners of
conscience being freed, and “help our fellow believers who are facing are
facing the same issue in Azerbaijan and Turkey”. Armenia claims amendments
to the Alternative Service Law now in Parliament will take the current
alternative service out of the control of the military. But the wording of
the amendments is unclear and does not unambiguously state this. Lieutenant
Colonel Sasun Simonyan, who was involved in preparing the amendments, told
Forum 18 that – as at present – anyone doing alternative service who
violated their terms of service would be dealt with by the Military
Prosecutor’s Office.

ARMENIA: EUROPEAN COURT FINDS CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR WAS WRONGFULLY
CONVICTED AND JAILED – BUT WHAT WILL GOVERNMENT DO?

By Felix Corley, Forum 18 News Service

Exactly eight years after he brought his case to European Court of Human
Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg in 2003, the Court’s Grand Chamber this
morning (7 July) ruled that Vahan Bayatyan had his right to freedom of
thought, conscience and religion violated and awarded him compensation.
Bayatyan, an Armenian Jehovah’s Witness, was imprisoned from September 2002
to July 2003 for refusal on grounds of conscience to perform compulsory
military service. Of the 17 judges, only the judge from Armenia, Alvina
Gyulumyan, dissented from the decision. There are currently 69 imprisoned
conscientious objectors in Armenia – all Jehovah’s Witnesses – and the
ECtHR judgment directly affects their cases.

Armenian officials gave only cautious responses to the verdict. “If this is
the decision of the European Court, the government must pay the
compensation,” Karine Kalantaryan, spokesperson for the Justice Ministry,
told Forum 18 News Service from the Armenian capital Yerevan on 7 July.
“The government has always paid compensation handed down in such cases.”
However, asked about the implications of the judgment for the current
prisoners, she referred to Deputy Justice Minister Emil Babayan. His
Assistant told Forum 18 the same day that he was out at a conference.

A senior official of the central government apparatus – who asked not to be
identified – told Forum 18 that “in the execution of the judgment, the
government might review the situation of the imprisoned conscientious
objectors”, but gave no promises.

Jehovah’s Witnesses welcomed the judgment. “This landmark judgment by the
Grand Chamber should lead to the eventual release of the 69 Jehovah’s
Witnesses imprisoned in Armenia, and helpour fellow believers who are
facing are facing the same issue in Azerbaijan and Turkey,” one told Forum
18 from Yerevan on 7 July.

The Armenian government claims amendments to the Alternative Service Law
now in Parliament will take the current alternative service out of the
control of the military. However, human rights defenders and Jehovah’s
Witnesses have told Forum 18 of their doubt at this claim, as the wording
of the amendments does not clearly establish this.

Rights violated

In today’s ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment, the Court found that Bayatyan’s
right, under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms, to freedom of thought, conscience and religion had
been violated. It stated that Bayatyan’s “failure to report for military
service was a manifestation of his religious beliefs. His conviction for
draft evasion therefore amounted to an interference with his freedom to
manifest his religion as guaranteed by Article 9” (see
).

This overturns the controversial 2009 judgment that Bayatyan’s right to
freedom of thought, conscience and religion had not been violated (see
Commentary by Derek Brett of Conscience and Peace Tax International at
). Bayatyan appealed
after that judgment (see F18News 7 December 2010
).

The ECtHR today noted, among other points, Armenia’s formal commitments to
respect the right to conscientious objection when it joined the Council of
Europe (see below). Considering the case, the ECtHR found that the
conviction and imprisonment was “not necessary in a democratic society” and
so violated Article 9. Indeed, the Court argued that: “respect on the part
of the State towards the beliefs of a minority religious group like the
applicant’s by providing them with the opportunity to serve society as
dictated by their conscience might, far from creating unjust inequalities
or discrimination as claimed by the Government, rather ensure cohesive and
stable pluralism and promote religious harmony and tolerance in society.”

The Court’s judgment – which is final and cannot be challenged – orders the
Armenian government to pay compensation to Bayatyan within three months of
10,000 Euros (5,267 Armenian Drams, 77,500 Norwegian Kroner or 14,253 US
Dollars), plus a further 10,000 Euros in costs.

As well as paying compensation and costs, states are required to abide by
judgments by also ensuring that the reasons for violations found by the
ECtHR are removed. This can include changing legislation.

Other Council of Europe member states which currently imprison
conscientious objectors are Azerbaijan (see F18News 22 February 2011
), and Turkey (see
F18News 17 March 2010
). Today’s ECtHR
judgment – in a comment that may have implications for the laws and
official actions of both states – noted that “the overwhelming majority” of
Council of Europe member states have “already recognised in their law and
practice the right to conscientious objection”.

Armenia’s Council of Europe commitment

On its accession to the Council of Europe in January 2001, Armenia formally
pledged to: “adopt, within three years of accession [i.e. by 25 January
2004], a law on alternative service in compliance with European standards
and, in the meantime, to pardon all conscientious objectors sentenced to
prison terms or service in disciplinary battalions, allowing them instead
to choose, when the law on alternative service has come into force to
perform non-armed military service or alternative civilian service”.

The current Alternative Service Law was adopted in 2003 (coming into force
on 1 July 2004), but despite amendments in 2004 and 2006, it still fails to
meet Armenia’s Council of Europe commitment to allow a choice of
“alternative civilian service” to be possible. Jehovah’s Witnesses and a
Molokan who initially accepted the Law’s “alternative service” quickly
abandoned it when it became clear that the “alternative” was controlled and
overseen by the military. They were soon imprisoned, and Armenian has
failed follow its Council of Europe commitment to pardon – and therefore
release – its prisoners of conscience who object to compulsory military
service (see F18News 7 December 2010
).

69 imprisoned conscientious objectors

As of the beginning of July, 69 young men – all Jehovah’s Witnesses – were
imprisoned for refusing both military service and the military-controlled
alternative service, Jehovah’s Witnesses told Forum 18. All were sentenced
under Article 327, Part 1 of the Criminal Code, which punishes evasion of
the call-up to military or alternative service. The maximum sentence under
this article was increased to three years’ imprisonment in December 2005.

Of the current 69 prisoners, four are serving maximum sentences of 36
months, 35 are serving 30-month sentences, one is serving a 27-month
sentence, 28 are serving 24-month sentences, one is serving an 18-month
sentence and one a 12-month sentence. Seven of the prisoners were sentenced
in 2011, with the most recent two trials in April. The 69 prisoners are
serving their sentences in prisons in Artik, Erebuni, Kosh and Nubarashen.

The number of conscientious objector prisoners has hovered around 70 for
several years, almost all of them Jehovah’s Witnesses. One Molokan (an
early Russian Protestant-style Christian community), Pavel Karavanov, was
also imprisoned as a conscientious objector, being freed in 2006 (see
F18News 2 May 2007

http://www.forum18.org/

L’Azerbaïdjan interdit une ONG britannique de déminage active au NK

Agence France Presse
8 juillet 2011 vendredi 3:09 PM GMT

L’Azerbaïdjan interdit une ONG britannique de déminage active au Karabakh

BAKOU 8 juil 2011

L’Azerbaïdjan a interdit l’ONG britannique Halo Trust, spécialisée
dans le déminage, sur son territoire car elle menait des activités
dans la région séparatiste du Nagorny Karabakh que Bakou se dispute
avec l’Arménie, a indiqué vendredi le patron de l’agence nationale des
mines.

“Nous avons indiqué que l’organisation devait cesser ses activités
dans les territoires occupés et présenter ses excuses à Bakou. Mais
ils ne l’ont pas fait”, a justifié ce patron, Nazim Ismaïlov, aux
médias locaux.

Du matériel appartenant à l’ONG, qui devait arriver en Afghanistan via
l’Azerbaïdjan, a également été temporairement saisi, a-t-il ajouté.

La tension est nettement montée ces derniers mois entre l’Azerbaïdjan
et l’Arménie, avec des accrochages armés réguliers autour du
territoire séparatiste qui est soutenu par Erevan.

Rattaché à l’Azerbaïdjan pendant la période soviétique, le Nagorny
Karabakh a proclamé son indépendance, non reconnue par la communauté
internationale, après une guerre qui a fait 30.000 morts et des
centaines de milliers de réfugiés entre 1988 et 1994.

Un cessez-le-feu a été signé en 1994, mais Bakou et Erevan n’arrivent
pas à se mettre d’accord sur le statut de la région qui reste une
source de tension dans le Caucase du Sud, une zone stratégique située
entre l’Iran, la Russie et la Turquie.

Depuis 2000, Halo Trust indique avoir retiré “près de 50.000 mines
terrestres, armes à sous-munitions et autres engins d’artillerie
non-explosés” présents sur le territoire du Karabakh depuis la guerre,
selon son site Internet.

Fin mai, un journaliste de la radio indépendante russe Echo de Moscou
a été interdit d’entrer en Azerbaïdjan pour avoir visité la région
séparatiste de Nagorny Karabakh.

eg-emc/lap/neo/ih

President Sargsyan Denies International Pressure on Karabakh Talks

President Sargsyan Denies International Pressure on Karabakh Talks

hetq
17:32, July 9, 2011

After the first conference of young officers in various branches of
the Armenian military, President Sargsyan denied reports that the
international community had stepped up pressure on Armenia to reach a
compromise solution to the Karabakh conflict.

“We are doing everything to reach a peaceful solution of the matter
and the process is continuing. What is more important is that talk
about pressure being exacted is an exaggeration. The Minsk Co-Chairs
are trying to bring the positions of all sides closer together,”
President Sargsyan noted.

He said the process was a difficult one and that Armenia never
expected it to be easy.

“Our position is clear but it’s not easily accepted by the other side.
We are doing all in our power to reach a just solution. The more
officers like you in our ranks, who are confident and combat ready,
the better our negotiating position will be,” concluded the president.

KIEV: Ukrainian, Armenian Presidents Discuss Karabakh Settlement

UKRAINIAN, ARMENIAN PRESIDENTS DISCUSS KARABAKH SETTLEMENT

UT1
July 1, 2011
Ukraine

[Presenter] Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan has arrived on an
official visit to Kiev.

This is the first visit by an Armenian leader to Ukraine for the
last 10 years. Despite the diplomatic pause and bad weather in Kiev,
the reception was warm, the Armenian president said.

Our correspondent Natalya Malyshko knows more.

[Passage omitted: the official ceremony of the reception]

[Correspondent] Serzh Sargsyan is in a good mood. Yesterday, he marked
his 57th birthday. Today, his Ukrainian counterpart congratulated
him on the birthday and promised assistance in settling the Nagornyy
Karabakh conflict in 2013, when Ukraine presides over the OSCE.

[Yanukovych, in Russian] I want to congratulate you, Serzh Azatovich,
on your birthday and wish you well and peace. We have splendid
partnership and friendly relations in trade and economy both with
Armenia and Azerbaijan. It is in our interests to have this conflict
resolved in a peaceful way.

[Correspondent] Armenia and Azerbaijan were one step away from
resolving the painful issue, Sargsyan said. However, the reconciliation
did not happen during the last talks in Russia’s Kazan.

The countries did not agree the text of a peace agreement.

Yerevan continues to pin hopes on international mediation in settling
the conflict.

[Sargsyan, in Russian] The people of Nagornyy Karabakh
are internationally recognized carriers of the right to
self-determination. This right must be implemented. We hope that
Ukraine’s presidency will make an important contribution to promoting
principles and values of the organization. We are ready to provide
out broadest and effective support for that.

Armenian Opposition Rally Postponed

ARMENIAN OPPOSITION RALLY POSTPONED

news.am
July 6, 2011
Armenia

YEREVAN. – The Rally the opposition Armenian National Congress (ANC)
is postponed. The political council of the ANC made this decision
on Wednesday.

Instead of August 1 the rally will be held on August 2. The decision
has been made due to the fact that August 1 is a Day of Remembrance
of the deceased, ANC spokesperson Arman Musinyan told Armenian News
– NEWS.am.

“We made a mistake on this issue,” he added.

The main discussion topic of the political council was the preparatory
work to the upcoming rally.

Armenian Economy Rated As World’s Second Worst

ARMENIAN ECONOMY RATED AS WORLD’S SECOND WORST
Giorgi Lomsadze

EurasiaNet.org
July 6, 2011

Armenia’s economy is disappointing as it is, but now Forbes had
to rub it in by ranking it as one of the world’s worst economies,
second only to Madagascar.

“Per-capita GDP of $3,000 is less than a third of neighboring Turkey,
and inflation is running at 7%,” Forbes Senior Editor Daniel Fisher
wrote in his blog. “On top of that, Russia cut back on supplies of
diamonds, hurting Armenia’s once-thriving diamond-processing industry.”

CPR performed by international financial institutes, the West and
Russia may have helped put the economy on the mend, but recovery
is slow.

Economic data for the first quarter of 2011 shows no sign of an
immediate turnaround; Gross Domestic Product growth registered just
1.2 percent, RFE/RL’s Armenian service reports.

For a country badly whacked by the global financial crisis, the Forbes
ranking, no doubt, adds insult to injury, but, so far, no official
reactions from Yerevan.

Russian-Armenian Talks

RUSSIAN-ARMENIAN TALKS

Qatar News Agency
July 6, 2011 Wednesday 8:55 PM EST

Moscow, July 06 (QNA) – Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov held
talks here today with his Armenian counterpart Edward Nalbandian who
is currently visiting Moscow.

The talks dealt with the development of relations between the two
countries, especially in the economic, trade and investment sectors.

In a statement after the talks Nalbandian praised the level of
relations between his country and Russia saying “the political and
economic dialogue between the two countries has witnessed unprecedented
development.”

He said the volume of Russian investments in Armenian economy in
the current period totaled three billion dollars, adding that his
country “highly evaluated the efforts of Moscow, in its capacity as
a member of the Minsk Group of the Council of Europe Parliamentary
Assembly, aimed to reach a peaceful settlement to the conflict of
Nagorno-Karabakh region. ”

For his part, the Russian Foreign Minister said in a similar statement
that the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s (OSCE)
supervision of the Nagorno-Karabakh resulted in a decrease in the
number of incidents in the region.(QNA)

BAKU: Russian FM: Russian President To Make Decision On Further Acti

RUSSIAN FM: RUSSIAN PRESIDENT TO MAKE DECISION ON FURTHER ACTIONS TO RESOLVE NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

Trend Daily News
July 6, 2011 Wednesday 2:16 PM GMT +4

The details were added (the first version was posted at 13:19)

Azerbaijan, Baku, July 6 / Trend E.Tariverdiyeva /

Resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will continue in the
near future, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said at a press
conference, Russia 24 TV channel reported.

“We stated that the presidents in Kazan stressed the coordination
of important issues that create conditions for achieving a final
agreement on a settlement,” Lavrov said.

Lavrov said that Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, acting as a
mediator with the consent and support of the U.S and France, completed
the analysis of the situation after the Kazan meeting and will make
a decision on further actions soon.

“Taking into account the special ties with the parties of the conflict,
President Medvedev expressed the initiative to hold some consultations
with the presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia two years ago to find
specific agreements to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,” he
said. “We think that now it is time to make decisions.”

Changing the format of the talks will not be productive, he said.

The OSCE Minsk Group’s co-chairmen are mediators in the conflict,
rather than the OSCE Minsk Group.

Presidents Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan, Dmitry Medvedev of Russia and
Serzh Sargsyan of Armenia discussed in Kazan the basic principles of
the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement. The meeting, which was the
ninth in the last three years, ended without reaching an agreement on
the basic principles of settlement. In a joint statement, the sides
mentioned the progress towards this goal.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France, and the U.S. –
are currently holding peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.

Should Israel Apologize To Turkey?

SHOULD ISRAEL APOLOGIZE TO TURKEY?
By DEBORAH DANAN

Jerusalem Post

July 7 2011

If the Turkish demand for an apology is nothing more than a hammed-up
provocation, is Israel justified in refusing to acquiesce – even if
it means restoring ties with its Muslim ally?

The back-and-forth spat between Israeli and Turkish officials over the
Mavi Marmara affair conjures up scenarios of a schoolyard bully pulling
his classmate’s pigtails before a teacher intervenes and demands an
apology. But bizarrely, at the bully’s insistence that “she started
it,” it is the hair-abuse victim who is asked to apologize.

Israel is the unassuming little girl, the IHH-backed ship is the
bully and the teacher is the Turkish government.

Of course, most people will argue that the allegory’s characterizations
are the wrong way around: after all, the image of trained IDF soldiers
shimmying down ropes doesn’t exactly bring Laura Ingalls to mind,
and for that matter the phrase “humanitarian activists” isn’t quite
analogous with the image of a tormenting schoolboy menace.

But it is exactly like that.

Without the Turkish government’s support of the IHH – recognized by
Israel as a terrorist organization – the Mavi Marmara might never
have breached the blockade, and nine lives would have been saved.

However, for argument’s sake, let’s imagine for a moment that the
facts on the sea are irrelevant. In such a scenario, the only relevant
question is this: Is the excessive hoo-hahing about who owes whom an
apology worth the price that both sides are paying?

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, not known for his eloquence, fell
on the sword of his own rhetoric on Wednesday at a meeting of the
Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. Lieberman restated
his view that “there is no need to apologize” to Turkey, and that
doing so would be “a humiliation.” He also accused Turkey of using
the apology-card as a cheap trick to flex their muscles in the region,
stating that it was simply “a matter of honor” for the Turks.

Yet when speaking to reporters after the meeting, Lieberman seemed
to have undergone a change of heart regarding the importance of honor.

Israel cannot apologize to Turkey because, according to Lieberman,
doing so will “harm Israel’s dignity [and] national honor carries a
real significance.”

But if this is a legitimate rebuttal on Israel’s part, why is Turkey
slated for its own efforts towards the same end?

Semantics aside, can’t Israel simply swallow its pride and apologize
in much the same way a Englishman is prone to say sorry to the person
stepping on his toe? Isn’t the greater good of repairing diplomatic
relations with Israel’s Muslim ally worth the temporary embarrassment
of apologetics? And as we already know, sorry is not the hardest word
for Israel, as evidenced by the public apology to Turkey last year
over the “Sofagate” incident.

Unfortunately – at least in this part of the world – the answer is no.

A diplomatic apology is not a band-aid that gets discarded once the
wound has healed. Official apologies remain in collective memory
forever. They carry tremendous power and can reshape the historical
account of events. Furthermore, a diplomatic apology necessarily
includes an acknowledgement of responsibility and acceptance of
liability.

Consider what transpired at the UN-sponsored World Conference against
Racism in Durban, South Africa, close to 10 years ago. The conference
was a veritable finger-pointing fest, with Arab representatives
accusing Israel of racism while representatives from African countries
slammed Europe and the US over slavery. In the latter case, African
delegates demanded recognition of slavery as a crime against humanity
(which has no statute of limitations) and further demanded individual
apologies from European countries.

In the interests of preventing future liability, the delegations of
European countries – including Britain, Holland and Spain – fought
hard to substitute the word “apology” with “regret” – the same word
Israel is currently offering as an olive branch to Turkey.

[Incidentally, the issue of reparations and apologies over slavery is
one of the reasons the US pulled its delegation from the conference.]

So Europe and the US get away without ever officially succumbing
to the humiliation of apologising for slavery – indeed, they even
escaped having to pay reparations – while Israel is expected to
apologize over the use of “excessive” force during the breach of a
legally sound blockade?

And while we’re on the subject of overdue apologies, Turkey may want
to revisit its own sordid history on the matter.

Israel is not the first country to have its ties with Turkey severed
over the issue of apology. While the argument of “they did it so why
can’t we?” never works for Israel – primarily because the Jewish state
is measured by a different moral standard than the rest of the world –
there are things that are either too juicy or too horrifying to ignore.

Exhibit A is the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians at the hands of
the Ottomans during World War I. Demands by the Armenian community in
Turkey to receive an apology from Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
have consistently been met with refusal. To add insult to annihilation,
Turkey continues to reject the term genocide.

In light of its ongoing 16-year-old blockade with Armenia, one would
think Turkey would be a tad more sympathetic towards Israel’s own
blockade of Gaza.

So here’s a demand for you Prime Minister Erdogan: Instead of trying
to mask your country’s macabre history with deplorable refutations,
how about taking a leaf out of your own book and owning up to it? You
never know, apologizing to the Kurds and the Armenians might just
spur Israel to follow by example.

The writer is editor of The Jerusalem Post’s Premium Zone.

http://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Features/Article.aspx?id=228434

Secret Recording Of Negotiations Of Armenian Catholicos And Georgian

SECRET RECORDING OF NEGOTIATIONS OF ARMENIAN CATHOLICOS AND GEORGIAN PATRIARCH (VIDEO)

news.am
July 7 2011
Armenia

YEREVAN. – A new video excerpt from the negotiations between
Patriarch of All Georgia Ilia II and head of Armenian Apostolic
Church, Catholicos of All Armenians Karekin II appeared on Youtube
video hosting.

The clergymen speak in Russian and, judging from the clip, Armenian
Catholicos and the present party remained in highest spirits.

“You have it all, you have chickens, you have greens, and you have
vine,” Karekin II told Ilia II on the video.

Note that after the visit of Armenian Catholicos Karekin II to
Georgia on June 11-15, Georgian Patriarch Ilia II stated during Sunday
sermon at Holy Trinity Cathedral that Karekin II is a young man and
he probably needs more experience.

‘He has an acute mind, but he tries to make things go fast, which
does not work out. I told him that I have profound experience, which
suggests that the composed way is the best way.”

The Patriarch said that the Georgian Church is open for everybody
but it will never permit oppression of Georgian people and Georgia.

Armenian Church refrained from commenting this statement.

“Karekin II respects Ilia II and gives highest estimations of his
experience,” Spokesperson for Etchmiadzin Ter Vahram Melikyan told
Armenian News-NEWS.am correspondent.

watch video at

http://news.am/eng/news/67090.html