Mothers Of Deceased Soldiers Protest Outside Government

MOTHERS OF DECEASED SOLDIERS PROTEST OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT

Tert.am
18:56 22.09.11

A group of Armenian citizens had gathered outside the Government
Building in Yerevan, protesting for various issues.

Several women, wearing black clothes, were demanding the government
to find out the real reasons of the deaths of their sons in the army.

Some of them assumed that their sons might also participate in
the military parade celebrating the 20th anniversary of Armenia’s
independence, were they alive today.

Some of those gathered outside the Government Building were former
residents of North Avenue in central Yerevan, protesting for the
protection of their rights.

Also protesting were owners of kiosks who were condemning the decision
of the Yerevan Municipality to dismantle their trade facilities.

“The prime minister [Tigran Sargsyan] ordered not to touch the kiosks.

It turns out that the prime minister’s words are ignored,” said a
kiosk owner.

Speaking to Tert.am, some said they are sure the Yerevan Municipality
is implementing what they called a “denialist policy” and ignores
everybody’s opinion.

They said the kiosks in Yerevan are being dismantled without any
alternative solution offered to their owners.

Military Parade May Serve Deterrent For Azerbaijan – Expert

MILITARY PARADE MAY SERVE DETERRENT FOR AZERBAIJAN – EXPERT

news.am
Sept 22 2011
Armenia

YEREVAN.- Military parade, marking the 20th anniversary of Armenia’s
independence may become deterrent for Azerbaijan, said political
analyst Stepan Grigoryan.

According to him, the parade was also a report about spending budget
funds on military equipment presented to the Armenian society.

“Why not? Let Azerbaijan see our strength and calculate the losses
in case it decides to resume hostilities,” he emphasized.

The expert stressed that Armenia must always take into account the
geographical location. High level militarization is registered in
the entire region, he added.

Grigoryan said we must show our military capability as it can become
a deterrent for those who have any claims to Armenia.

Stepan Grigoryan also mentioned the fact that the first and second
presidents of Armenia did not participate in celebrations.

“If we build a democratic state, everyone has the right to go
anywhere or not, to take part in the festivities or not. In any case,
I think they could participate. However, they are free people and
make decisions themselves,” he said.

Armenia’s first and second presidents refused to participate in
the solemn events dedicated to the 20th anniversary of Armenia’s
independence. Spokesperson for first President Levon Ter-Petrosyan,
did not inform of the reasons, while Robert Kocharyan’s office said
he would not attend the events as he would be out of the country.

Akcam: Scientists Who Deny Armenian Genocide Are Corrupted By Turkis

AKCAM: SCIENTISTS WHO DENY ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ARE CORRUPTED BY TURKISH FOREIGN MINISTRY

Panorama
Sept 22 2011
Armenia

British “Times Higher Education” has published an article about
Armenian Genocide which is titled “Can we know the truth about
Armenian Genocide?”

“The editor-in-chief of “Agos” daily Hrant Dink was murdered in Turkey
in 2007 as he was holding a long lasting campaign against Turkish
denial of Armenian Genocide. Before Dink’s assassination he was sued
for “criticizing the Turks”. Turkish writer, Nobel Prize holder Orhan
Pamuk was also sued for the same issue. Now many scientists say those
who deny Armenian Genocide are corrupted by Turkish Foreign Ministry,”
writes the paper.

Taner Akcam, a professor of Clark University in Massachusetts, has
declared during Bucharest-hosted conference on Armenian Genocide that
he has received phone calls from anonymous sources that scientists
were corrupted to deny Armenian Genocide.

“If anybody works on the issue of Armenian Genocide, he/she can lost
the job. This is the reason why many scientists don’t use genocide
term. If I plan to live Turkey, I cannot find any job there,”
Akcam said.

“If Turkey opens Armenian-Turkish border and normalizes relations with
Armenia, it will positively impact on studies of Armenian Genocide,”
said Akcam.

How Will Armenia Vote On Palestine’s Independence Bid?

HOW WILL ARMENIA VOTE ON PALESTINE’S INDEPENDENCE BID?

news.am
Sept 22 2011
Armenia

Former Soviet republics are pondering on the position on recognition
of Palestinian state. Some take into account relations with Arabs and
Turks, and others – with the U.S. and the EU. But for the same reason,
some countries still can not decide, writes Israel-based Izrus.

In an article the author divides post-Soviet countries into four
groups. The first group includes those who unequivocally support
Palestinians, and it was announced publicly (Russia, Azerbaijan). The
second group includes four Muslim republics of the CIS, which have
not yet expressed public support for the Palestinians, but certainly
will vote in their favor (Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan and
Tajikistan). The third group comprises countries that have already
made it clear that they would not support Palestinian’s independence
bid (Ukraine, Georgia, Estonia and Latvia). The remaining states
are those which have not yet displayed their position on the issue
(Belarus, Moldova and Armenia).

“Armenia has not clarified its position on Palestine’s recognition
by September 22. Armenia does not have close relations with Israel,
but is Iran’s strategic partner in the Caucasus. At the same time
it maintains good relations with Lebanon and Syria, and, like its
opponent – Azerbaijan, is trying to get the support of Arabs on the
Karabakh issue,” the article reads.

The author points out that Yerevan, with regard to problems related
to the Middle East, adheres to Washington’s wishes. The example is
participating in the Iraqi operation and voting on some anti-Israeli
resolution in the UN. However, Armenians tried to keep a “balanced
position” not to annoy Arabs by alternating votes “for” and “against”,
the article mentions.

Leader of Palestine Mahmoud Abbas is expected to appeal to UN Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon with a written request to recognize independence
of Palestinian state during the UN General Assembly session.

New Book: Bournoutian: The 1823 Russian Survey Of The Karabagh Provi

THE 1823 RUSSIAN SURVEY OF THE KARABAGH PROVINCE

Sep 22, 2011

George A. Bournoutian History

A Primary Source on the Demography and Economy of Karabagh in the
First Half of the 19th Century

Description On May 14 (26), 1805 General Paul Tsitsianov, the
Russian commander in the Caucasus, and Ebrahim Khan of Karabagh
signed a treaty, by which the Karabagh Province became a Russian
protectorate. Ebrahim Khan promised to be a loyal subject of the
Russian Emperor, to pay an annual tribute of 8,000 gold rubles to
the treasury in Tiflis, and to send a son and a grandson as hostages
to Tiflis. In exchange, Russia promised that Ebrahim Khan and his
progeny would continue as the khans of Karabagh and that local rule,
including the courts and administration, as well as the taxes would
remain under Ebrahim Khan’s jurisdiction.

On the night of June 2 (14), 1806, a group of Russian soldiers
killed Ebrahim Khan, after he had reportedly resubmitted to Fath
`Ali Shah of Iran and had left Shushi to join the Iranian army. The
Russians appointed Mahdiqoli, a son of Ebrahim Khan, as the new Khan
of Karabagh. He promised to abide by the articles of the 1805 treaty.

On November 21 (December 2) 1822 Mahdiqoli Khan fled to
Iran. Taking advantage of the situation, General Alexei Ermolov, the
Commander-in-Chief of Georgia, Astrakhan, and the Caucasus, declared
the 1805 treaty null and void. He terminated the protectorate and, on
December 26 (January 7, 1823) sent a letter to Count Victor Kochubei,
the Minister of Internal Affairs, stating that Karabagh was now
incorporated into the Russian Empire.

In order to enumerate the population of Karabagh and ascertain the
revenues collected by the Khan, Ermolov, on January 13 (25), 1823,
ordered State Counselor Paul I. Mogilevskii and Colonel Ermolov II
to conduct a detailed survey of the Karabagh Province. On April 17
(29) 1823, they presented their findings in thirty-five registers to
the Municipal Council in Shushi, and on May 2 (14) to General Ermolov
in Tiflis.

The survey, titled The Description of the Karabagh Province, compiled
in 1823, was eventually published in 1866 by the printing house of
the Viceroy of the Caucasus in Tiflis. The number of copies printed
must have been very few, for it, as well as the previous surveys
conducted in the Sheki (Shakki) Province by Mogilevskii and General
F. Akhverdov in 1819, and in the Shirvan Province, by Mogilevskii and
General V. Madatov in 1820, both of which were also printed in 1866 in
Tiflis, soon became rarities. To our knowledge, with the exception of
I. P. Petrushevskii, no serious scholar of 19th-century Transcaucasia
or Iran has mined the valuable information contained in these surveys.

As a historian of the various khanates of Transcaucasia and Iran,
Prof. George Bournoutian had been very interested in examining
this survey for many years. Although he was told that it contained
information about the Armenians of Karabagh, his main interest was
the data on land tenure and taxation of another khanate which had been
under Iranian rule, but which had developed its own unique system of
land tenure and taxation, prior to its incorporation into the Russian
Empire. His interest in the region began as a graduate student, when he
chose the social and economic history of the Khanate of Erevan under
Iranian suzerainty as his doctoral subject. The survey conducted in
the Erevan Province immediately after the Russian annexation revealed
unique data on the administration, land tenure and taxation of the
khanate during the rule of its last Khan, Hoseynqoli, and added a
great deal of new information to our knowledge of the region.

The author, therefore, sought the 1823 survey printed in 1866 for
many years. Although he had been able to obtain a number of Xerox
copies from Armenia and Georgia, they were incomplete and poorly
reproduced. Finally, in 2003, he was delighted to learn that a new
edition, numbering only 500 copies, had appeared in Baku. However,
instead of printing a facsimile of the original, the production team
had decided to reformat the entire text. In doing so, they not only had
made numerous spelling and typographic errors, but had also omitted
important data, some of which appear to have been intentional. The
editors had not bothered to explain the invaluable data on the
administration, land tenure and taxation of Karabagh prior to its
annexation to Russia. One would have hoped that in reformatting the
entire text, the editor or some other scholar would have researched
the many terms and presented a true picture of the socioeconomic
conditions of Karabagh under the last Khan.

The present work is an accurate translation of the original survey,
which was obtained with the help of Vadim Gomoz from the Moscow
Library. It details the revenues collected from the city of Shushi, as
well as each district of Karabagh in 1822. Prof. Bournoutian explains
the various taxes collected and the types of land tenure prevalent
at the time. He also indicates the number of Armenians, Tatars,
and nomadic families, which inhabited each district in the region.

Finally he analyzes the data and provides an accurate picture of
the demography and economic conditions of Karabagh prior to its
incorporation into the Russian Empire and an important addition to
the history of the region under Iranian rule. The present study will
finally put to rest the claims that Armenian arrived in Karabagh only
after 1828.

http://www.mazdapublisher.com/BookDetails.aspx?BookID=300

BAKU: Armenian And Russian Boxers To Live On Special Protected Sport

ARMENIAN AND RUSSIAN BOXERS TO LIVE ON SPECIAL PROTECTED SPORT BASE IN BAKU

news.az
Sept 21 2011
Azerbaijan

National teams of Russia and Armenia in boxing will leave separately
from all teams during the world championship to start in Baku on
26 September.

The statement came from executive director of the Russian boxing
federation Eugeniy Sudakov.

“Now the men’s national team of Russia in boxing is training under
Moscow, in Chekhovo”, Sudakov said. “We will direct to Baku on 23
September morning. Under the agreement with the Boxing Federation
of Azerbaijan and the sport management of Azerbaijan, during the
world championships, the national teams of Armenia and Russia,
which has two boxers with Armenian surnames, will live separately
from other teams-on a specially protected sport base outside the
city. The reasons are clear, they are political. Though the period
of open ethnopolitical conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis
is already a past, we have decided to secure ourselves”.

When speaking about the boxers with Armenian surnames, Eugeniy Sudakov
meant David Hayrapetyan (49 kg) and Misha Aloyan (52 kg).

Elmir Aliyev News.Az

Azerbaijan To Expand Production Of Military Drones

AZERBAIJAN TO EXPAND PRODUCTION OF MILITARY DRONES
BYLINE: Lilit Gevorgyan

Global Insight
September 20, 2011

On 19 September the Azerbaijan Press Agency (APA) reported that the
Azerbaijani military will receive 60 Orbiter and Aerostar unmanned
vehicles (UAVs) by the end of 2011. The UAVs will be produced by an
Azerbaijani-Israeli joint venture (JV) set up in March by Azerbaijan’s
Defence Industry Ministry and Israeli manufacturer Aeronautics UAV.

The news agency’s report comes shortly after an Azerbaijani UAV
was shot down on 12 September by the ethnic Armenian armed forces
of Nagorno-Karabakh, which split from Azerbaijan back in 1988. The
Nagorno-Karabakh Defence Ministry publicised the photographs and
video of the downed UAV. The spokesperson for the Nagorno-Karabakh
president stated that it was carried out with radio-electronic devices.

It clearly showed that parts of the UAV were made by NovAtel company
and that it was of the Hermes type, most likely supplied by Israel to
Azerbaijan. Israel’s Elbit received a contract in the second half of
2008 to supply at least 10 (some sources say 15) units of the Hermes
450 UAVs to Azerbaijan. The Azerbaijani Defence Ministry denied the
news of its UAV being shot down but the APA report confirms that
Azerbaijan is continuing its rearmament project. Azerbaijani-Israeli
military relations have grown stronger over the years seeing a number
of lucrative, including military hardware supply and joint production
agreements signed during Israeli president Shimon Peres’ official
visit to the Azerbaijani capital Baku in 2009. Azerbaijan supplies
up to 40% of Israeli oil demand through the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline
via Turkey. In return, Israel supplies Azerbaijan with new military
technologies, including the UAVs, and is also upgrading Azeri army
battle tanks. Additionally, some media reports suggest that since
2005 Israel has supplied surface-to-air missiles, rocket launchers
and communications equipment to Baku.

Significance:Developing new military capabilities is at the top
of the Azerbaijani leadership’s political agenda. President Ilham
Aliyev has repeatedly threatened to pull out from internationally
mediated peace process over the status of Nagorno-Karabakh. Bolstered
by energy-export-generated income Azerbaijan is gaining confidence
that it could force Nagorno-Karabakh under its control through
military force. Nagorno-Karabakh has reported an increased number of
sightings of Azeri UAVs over Nagorno-Karabakh in recent months. This
is a violation of the 1994 armistice and the Armenian government is
currently waiting for international mediators to visit the site of
the fallen UAV. While the production of surveillance UAVs is good
news for Azerbaijani military, the political implications could be
rather damaging. Should the violation of the armistice continue, this
is unlikely to persuade the international mediators to change their
position on the basic principles of the settlement of the conflict.

Meanwhile, both Azerbaijani and Israeli governments have been
unsuccessful in their efforts not to showcase their co-operation,
which is politically sensitive for Azerbaijani’s ethnic kin Turkey
and also Azerbaijan’s own mainly Muslim population. This could lead
to political repercussions for the current Azerbaijani government.

The ‘Arab Spring’ Is Frightening Christians In The Middle East

THE ‘ARAB SPRING’ IS FRIGHTENING CHRISTIANS IN THE MIDDLE EAST
By Giacomo Galeazzi

Assyrian International News Agency

Sept 21 2011

Vatican City — First, the Maronite Patriarch, Bechara Raï, in Lebanon,
and now, the Chaldean Archbishop in Kirkuk, Louis Sako, in Iraq. The
development of the Arab spring are causing concern to leaders of
Eastern Christian communities, who have by now started to openly
express their fears with regard to an rise in Islamic radicalism
in the New Middle East. “The Arab Spring has created more Muslim
militants,” the Iraqi Archbishop, Sako complained, pointing out the
risk of the thousand year old Middle Eastern culture of pluralism,
crumbling. But the West too has made a mistake: “Instead of trying
to impose the western model of democracy, they need to invest in
youngsters’ education,” Kirkuk’s Chaldean spiritual leader commented.

Archbishop Sako has, already, on several occasions, made lively appeals
to the International community, asking it to protect Christians in
Iraq who “risk extinction”. Indeed, “in Iraq, the number of Christians
continues to drop. They could disappear altogether as a result of
continuous persecution, threats and violence.” Between America’s
invasion of Iraq in 2003 and today, there have been attacks on about
sixty Churches; one bishop and three priests have been kidnapped and
killed; approximately a thousand innocent Christians have been killed
and hundreds of thousands forced to abandon their homes in search of
safety. This is why, “in Iraq and in other Countries, there is a risk
of the Christian community becoming extinct.”

What is worrying the prelate the most is “the lack of a plan”, when
Christians in Iraq and the Middle East have two options: “They can
either emigrate or accept life as second rate citizens amidst numerous
difficulties and fears.” Hence the appeal: “We are in need of stronger
support from everyone, with a clear political vision and clearly set
out plans, not just to protect and encourage Christians to stay in
their country, but also to promote reconciliation among the Iraqis,
and human rights,” as well as to “ensure governments respect the
rules.” According to Monsignor Sako, “the international community
needs to assume responsibility” and “come to a mutual agreement
with local authorities” in order to guarantee equal protection and
equality between all citizens. The international community must also
“help emigrants to return” or, if this is not possible, they should
help them remain settled wherever they have found shelter.

It is therefore the picture as a whole that is raising alarm bells.

The last Vatican Synod on the Middle East, showed that Christians in
the area, total 20 million in a population of 356 million. Catholics
(in their various rites) are estimated at almost six million. Syriacs,
Copts, Chaldeans and Maronites, are all Christian communities
which are talked about often in the Middle Eastern news, and who
often fall victim to violence, discrimination and bombings. These
are denominations that are not often heard of in the western world,
despite the fact that they are the heirs of ancient Christian Empires
that were created in opposition to Byzantium and went as far as to
conquer Central Asia, before being brushed away by the Tamerlane
hordes. History and continuous schisms weakened these communities
which had once been powerful. Their current presence, numbers aside,
represents an important religious and political heritage for the Church
as a whole, and serves as a reminder of the fact that Christianity
was born in the East and is an Oriental religion.

The Syriac Church, which is present primarily in Iraq, was born in
the fifth century in Antioch: its founders were Monophysites, in
other words, contrary to the Byzantine Roman tradition, they denied
the double nature of God as man too in the form of Jesus. Hostile as
they were towards Byzantium, the Syriacs fitted in well with the new
Arabic Islamic structures. In the Eighteenth century, a group of them
decided to reunite with Rome and today are called Syriac Catholics.

The Assyrian Church, which also has its roots in Iraq, was born out
of Mesopotamia’s earliest Christian communities, during the second
century of the Christian era. It developed in relative isolation
compared to Byzantium and welcomed Nestor’s heresy theories, which
spoke of a human Jesus and a divine Jesus, making them their own. The
Assyrian Patriarchate’s headquarters, were established in Bagdad.

The Chaldean Church, on the other hand, was formed out of a schism
in the Assyrian Church, during the Sixteenth century, when a number
of bishops and faithful decided to reunite with Rome. The Chaldean
community is concentrated mainly in Iraq.

The Coptic Church, in turn, was born in Alexandria. The name derives
from the Greek word “aigyptos”, meaning Egyptian. This Church was also
against Byzantium and the doctrine of Christ’s dual nature. The Arabic
invasion of 641 marked the beginning of their decline, but also the
Islamisation of society. The Copts still form a considerable minority.

A small Coptic Catholic Church has also existed since the Eighteenth
century.

Then there is the Armenian Church. The Armenians were the first people
to convert, as a nation, to Christianity during the Fourth century.

Since then, they have kept their own independent identity. During the
Nineteenth century, an Armenian Catholic Church was officially formed
(in a meeting in Rome), with Patriarchal headquarters in Istanbul.

The Maronites were founded in the Fourth century, around the teaching
of Saint Maron. The Maronite Church was founded as a Christian
enclave in the Lebanese mountains during the Crusades in 1182,
declaring its unity with Rome. Added to all these autocephalous
churches are those of Orthodox rites, which remained faithful to
Byzantium, following the schism of 1054 with Rome. The Melkites are
Orthodox faithful who re-entered the Catholic Church and are mostly
concentrated in Palestine. It is difficult to give numbers for each
of these communities.

http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it
http://www.aina.org/news/20110921191717.htm

Medvedev Lauds Ties With Armenia

MEDVEDEV LAUDS TIES WITH ARMENIA

The Voice of Russia
Sept 21 2011

President Medvedev praised Russia’s cooperation with Armenia in
his greetings to the country’s leadership on its 20th independence
anniversary.

Medvedev welcomed the two countries cooperation in high technology
areas and expressed hope that the forthcoming visit to Russia by
Armenia’s President Serzh Sargsyan would give fresh impetus to
bilateral ties.

Russian servicemen stationed in Armenia took part in an anniversary
parade in Yerevan on Wednesday.

A TV commentator covering the parade said that Armenia’s strategic
cooperation with Russia promoted further development and modernization
of the Armenian Armed Forces, which rely on predominantly Russian-made
equipment and hardware.

President: Armenians Would Build A Country Close To Their Ideals

PRESIDENT: ARMENIANS WOULD BUILD A COUNTRY CLOSE TO THEIR IDEALS

ARKA
Sep 21, 2011

YEREVAN, September 21. /ARKA/. Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan,
speaking today at a military parade dedicated to the 20th anniversary
of Armenia’s independence, said that within 20 years Armenians would
build a country close to their ideals.

“We have reached dramatic progress for two decades, but we still have
plenty to do,” he said. “Both achievements and faults are ours. With
such an acknowledgement and public solidarity we’ll be able to build
a close-to-our-ideals country. I believe in this, just as I believe
in our collective strength.”

He said that this is not the Armenia that was 20 years ago. The country
went through many trials for these two decades and grew stronger.

“This is a new Armenia that can’t be deceived, intimidated, forced
or blackmailed,” the head of state said. “It is possible to establish
friendship with Armenia, cooperate with it, share success and sorrow
with it, to set an example to it and follow its example. This is
a new Armenia which remembers many things, but is not rancorous,
which has seen a great deal, but directs its eyes to the future.”

He congratulated Armenian people and wished them prosperity.

Today Armenians celebrate the 20th anniversary of independence
declaration.

On this day in 1991 the Supreme Soviet (parliament) of the republic
held a referendum on secession from the USSR and the creation of
an independent state. About 99% of eligible citizens vote for
independence. Officially, the independence was declared by the
parliament on 23 September.