Armenia’S Armavia To Buy Russia’s Superjet 100 Despite Crash

ARMENIA’S ARMAVIA TO BUY RUSSIA’S SUPERJET 100 DESPITE CRASH

Prime-Tass English-language Business Newswire
May 10, 2012 Thursday 5:57 PM EET
Russia

Armenian national air carrier Armavia has no plans to suspend
negotiations over the acquisition of the second Sukhoi Superjet 100,
produced by Russian aircraft maker Sukhoi Civil Aircraft, following
a recent crash of a plane of this type, the airline’s press office
said Thursday, RIA Novosti reported.

Russia’s Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft with more than 40 people on
board crashed on Wednesday into Indonesia’s Mount Salak.

An Armavia representative said that the airline has been involved in
negotiations over the purchase of a second aircraft for two months,
though no exact terms have been reported yet.

The representative also said that the exploitation of the first Sukhoi
Superjet 100, which was delivered in April 2011, is well under way.

“We have no serious claims, though there are some faults like in any
other plane,” the representative added.

Also, the representative pointed out that it is still too early to
speak about the catastrophe as they are still waiting for the results
of the investigation.

The Sukhoi Superjet 100 is Russia’s first all-new passenger aircraft
since the collapse of the Soviet Union. It is expected to eventually
replace the obsolete Tu-134 passenger plane.

Pious Turks Push For Labor Justice

PIOUS TURKS PUSH FOR LABOR JUSTICE
BY: SUSANNE GUSTEN

The International Herald Tribune
May 10, 2012 Thursday
France

Young people protest government’s promotion of a pro-capitalist stance

Young Muslims have been congregating to critique the reign of the
mildly Islamist government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan as
“capitalism with ablutions.”

FULL TEXT For the Turkish youths who set out to change the world last
week, May Day began with prayers.

Prostrating themselves outside the mosque in Istanbul’s pious
neighborhood of Fatih, hundreds of young men and women prayed for
the souls of the workers killed in Turkey’s all too common industrial
accidents. Then they picked up their placards and marched across town
to join the leftists and labor unions at their rally in Taksim square.

A roar of surprise and delight went up from the red-flagged masses in
Taksim when the column marched into the square under a black banner
bearing the slogan “God – Bread – Freedom.”

“It was an emotional moment,” Mem Aslan, 29, one of the organizers of
the Anti-Capitalist Muslim Youth march, said last week, recounting
how an aged Communist had embraced him with tears streaming down
his face. “It proved that we can overcome the division of the people
into left and right, created by our common enemy, the ruling class,
to pit us against each other and enslave us all.”

It was the first public appearance of a movement that has been brewing
at universities and in social media, where young Muslims have been
critiquing the reign of the mildly Islamist government of Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan as “capitalism with ablutions.”

After almost 10 years in power, Mr. Erdogan’s ruling Justice and
Development Party, or A.K.P., is coming under pressure from a new
generation of Muslims calling for more social justice and democracy,
in a trend that could change Turkey and offer new perspectives to
societies in the Middle East searching for ways to combine Islamic
values with a modern pluralist state, analysts said.

“We organized the whole thing within 10 days,” Mr. Aslan said about
the prayer and march, which drew more than 1,000 participants and
made headlines on every news program that night. “That is because
its time has come.”

The march heralds a generational conflict within the Islamist movement,
said Murat Somer, a political scientist and expert on political Islam
at Koc University in Istanbul. “The A.K.P. was born of the marriage
between moderate Islam and global capitalism,” he said in a telephone
interview this week. “The younger generation of some Islamists has
a different take on social justice. They focus more on economics and
a class-based understanding.”

“There is a basis for this movement. It did not come out of nowhere,”
he said.

The angry youths matter to the A.K.P. because they come from the
party’s electoral grass roots, he added, noting that the A.K.P.

“cannot disregard it.”

In Fatih, Mr. Aslan and Murad Icoz, 26, a university student and
co-organizer of the march, detailed their criticism of the A.K.P. and
the rapidly rising Muslim middle class it represents.

“We have a government that calls itself Muslim, but since they came to
power, the number of banks in this street has risen from 10 to 25,”
Mr. Aslan said. “Some people have become rich, while others struggle
to survive. We are talking about people who are sucking our blood.”

Since vaulting to power 10 years ago on religiously inspired demands
for social justice, the A.K.P. has lifted millions out of poverty,
more than doubling the gross domestic product from (EURO)244 billion to
(EURO)551 billion in 2010, according to European Union figures. Per
capita income in purchasing power standards rose from (EURO)7,400 per
annum to (EURO)11,800 during that period, according to those figures,
bringing it from 36 percent to 48 percent of the E.U. average.

The economic boom created by a generation of pious Muslim
entrepreneurs, nicknamed the “Islamic Calvinists” for their religiously
inspired capitalist work ethic, has brought forth a Muslim middle
class that today includes almost 60 percent of the Turkish population
by the definition of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development of having $10 to spend per person per day, according to
a study by the KMG polling firm published this week.

But the minimum wage for workers remains at 700 Turkish lira, or $395,
per month, with a six-day work week, and many workers labor 70 hours
a week for even less pay in the gray market that accounts for a third
of the Turkish economy, according to the Finance Ministry.

Occupational safety is abysmal, with lax laws and even more lax
controls. Seventy-five workers died in industrial accidents in
April alone, according to the Workers’ Health and Safety Council,
a nongovernmental organization that tracks such deaths, bringing the
total of workers drowned, crushed or burned to death in the first
four months of this year to 239.

Labor laws remain almost as repressive as they have been since the
military smashed the labor unions after the 1980 coup d’etat, requiring
workers to register their wish to join a union with a notary public,
with a resulting rate of unionization that remains well below 10
percent and workers left at the mercies of their employers.

The economic upswing and social realignment have caused a new chasm to
open within the pious masses that carried the A.K.P. to power against
the secularist elites in the military, bureaucracy and judiciary a
decade ago.

“Now that there are many rich Muslims, they have begun to regard
themselves as a separate class,” Mr. Icoz said. “They live in their
new suburbs, far away from the poor, to comply with the admonition of
the Prophet against ‘sleeping sated while one’s neighbor goes hungry.’
That’s how low they have dragged Islam.

“They think it is enough to perform the rituals of Islam, like praying,
fasting, the Hajj,” he added. “They exploit the workers and then go to
prayers. They give no thought to the spiritual, moral side of Islam.”

Mr. Aslan said it was the quest for a just society under those moral
imperatives that triggered the anti-capitalist Muslim movement.

“We want to take the Prophet as a role model for our time and ask
the questions he would ask,” he said. “Why do workers in this society
work such long hours, why are they oppressed, why are they scorned?

Why are the Kurds treated as they are, why are the Alevi treated this
way? These are questions the Prophet would ask, because this society
is very far from the ideal society of the Koran.”

The movement does not strive for an Islamic state, both men stressed,
but for social justice in a secular state.

In their march, the youths brandished placards demanding an end to
nuclear energy, a right to conscientious objection, a lifting of the
head scarf ban and more rights for Kurds and Armenians.

“All Property Belongs to God,” proclaimed one sign; “All Oppressed
Are Equal,” said another. A large banner read “Freedom From Slavery”
in Kurdish, Armenian and Arabic as well as in Turkish.Some of the
female marchers wore head scarves, while others went bareheaded. An
impromptu manifesto read out at the rally included quotations from
the Bible and the Torah as well as the Koran.

“They are very open and inclusive,” Ihsan Eliacik, a theologian whose
writings have influenced the students, said in a telephone interview
last week.

“They are also very courageous,” he added, alluding to the fate of
former Turkish youth activists such as the iconic Deniz Gezmis, who
was hanged at the age of 25 exactly 40 years ago this week, or Erdal
Eren, executed at age 16 along with other young activists after the
1980 coup.

Mr. Eliacik, who provided the youths with a basement from which
to organize the march, but insists he plays no leading role in
the movement, advocates a liberal and humanist, if not socialist,
interpretation of Islam comparable to Christian liberation theology.

“Capitalism is teetering, and people are searching for alternatives,”
he said. “Communism tried to provide an alternative without religion,
but that didn’t work. Now people are looking for faith-based
alternatives to capitalism. Islam has the capacity to offer that
alternative.”

The emergence of the anti-capitalist Muslim movement has galvanized
observers on both sides of Turkey’s political scene.

The left-wing columnist Oral Calislar wrote in the Radikal daily,
“Since most workers are pious, this new movement could open new doors
to the organization of the workers.”

In The Star daily, the columnist Fehmi Koru, a staunch supporter of
the A.K.P., warned the government to heed the movement’s message.

“The nature of power, with its daily decisions and constraints, can
drag politicians far from their original positions,” he wrote. The
appearance of the Muslim anti-capitalists should serve the A.K.P. as
a reminder of its roots and as a warning to adjust its policies,
he added.

Mr. Eliacik, the theologian, believes that will not be enough. “This
movement will grow, in Turkey as well across the region,” he said,
pointing out that young protesters in Egypt or Syria had rallied under
similar slogans. “God, Bread and Freedom – those demands express the
soul of this region and its societies,” he said.

Only By Knowing History Can New Generation Become True Citizens – Ar

ONLY BY KNOWING HISTORY CAN NEW GENERATION BECOME TRUE CITIZENS – ARMENIAN CATHOLICOS

news.am
May 11, 2012 | 17:13

All Armenian Catholicos Karekin II received the magistrates of
Armenia’s State Pedagogical Institute’s History and Rights faculty
and the Faculty Chair Ruben Mirzakhanyan on Friday at the Holy See
in Saint Etchmiadzin.

During the meeting the Catholicos talked about the important mission
of history teachers to educate the young generation with patriotism.

He stressed that only through knowing history can the new generation
become worthy citizens of our country and discover new ways for the
development of our nation.

Dairy Producer Says Cows Are Dying; Accuses Hospital Of Improper Tra

DAIRY PRODUCER SAYS COWS ARE DYING; ACCUSES HOSPITAL OF IMPROPER TRASH DISPOSAL
Marine Madatyan

hetq.am
17:46, May 11, 2012

A parcel of land owned by AgroHolding Armenia, a diary producer, lies
next to the Fridtjof Nansen Hospital in the town ofSpitak.

Company Director Arshavir Martikyan says that the cows feeding on
grass harvested form the land have been dropping like flies.

He says that workers must first clear the land of any garbage and
medical debris tossed out by hospital staffers.

“One prize milk cow choked on plastic bags in the field,” said
Martikyan, adding that he went to have a talk with the director at
the hospital.

“He told me that they didn’t have the necessary condition fort the
proper disposal of trash. I told him no problem. I figured that since
he was our neighbor I’d give them a break. I even went and purchased
to large trash receptacles for them to use. But the problem continued,”
Martikyan recounted.

Hospital Director Arsen Lazarian told Hetq that he was surprised to
hear that AgroHolding was complaining about the trash issue.

“They should have come to me first instead of going to the press. I
don’t get it,” said Lazarian.

This conflicts with the statements of Martikyan, who claims that
both he and the local company manager had talked to Lazarian about
the problem.

Director Lazarian assured Hetq that the land in question was indeed
clean. He said it was impossible that the site was dirty because
hospital staff had cleaned it just a few days ago.

When I showed him photos of trash on the site, Lazarian replied that
“the wind had blown the garbage on the site. What can I do?”

Lazarian even placed the blame on the patients staying at the
hospital, arguing that they weren’t accustomed to properly disposing
of their trash in the bins.

Agro Holding’s Martikyan said there was more dangerous trash than
plastic bags lurking in the field’s grass.

He said this was medical refuse dumped by hospital staff – needles,
syringes and drug bottles.

“We have land holdings throughoutArmenia. People are amazed at
how clean they are kept. But look at this field. They’re doctors
and should be the first to maintain sanitary conditions,” said a
frustrated Martikyan.

Ra Ambassador To Un: "terrorist Groups Freely Use Azerbaijan’s Terri

RA AMBASSADOR TO UN: “TERRORIST GROUPS FREELY USE AZERBAIJAN’S TERRITORY”

17:11 . 11/05

The Security Council held a discussion of reports of the anti-terrorist
committees by Azerbaijan’s chairmanship. The latter has tried to
exploit the chairing post rejecting Armenia’s request to deliver
a speech realizing that Armenia will not leave the cynical and
false statements of the Azerbaijani president in that body without
a response.

In the result of the pressure by the council member countries,
the Azerbaijani chairmanship had to provide Armenia’s permanent
representative in the UN, ambassador Karen Nazaryan with a chance to
deliver a speech. Taking into consideration the cross-border character
of the crime of terrorism, Armenia’s ambassador stated that in this
sphere the closed borders with neighbouring countries are one of the
main obstacles of regional cooperation and expressed a deep concern
that the international structures clearly state that the territory of
Azerbaijan is freely used by different terrorist groups and extreme
religious groups, which consider that country a safe environment for
that criminal activity.

To note, as a document of the Security Council, the statement of
the Armenian foreign ministry was officially circulated in the UN
connected with Aliyev’s May 4 speech, which brought about surprise
and evident dissatisfaction of the member countries.

http://www.yerkirmedia.am/?act=news&lan=en&id=7058

Nina Iskandaryan: The Higher The Post, The More Promises A Politicia

NINA ISKANDARYAN: THE HIGHER THE POST, THE MORE PROMISES A POLITICIAN GIVES DURING ELECTION CAMPAIGN

arminfo
Friday, May 11, 20:37

If the political parties want the people to vote for them, they
should keep their promises, Nina Iskandaryan, Head of the Planning
Department of the Caucasus Institute, said in Yerevan on Friday, when
commenting on the results of the monitoring of the political parties’
election promises.

Iskandaryan said that the Caucasus Institute monitored the election
promises of all the 9 parties, but presented the programs of the
6 parties that have obtained seats in parliament. In particular,
the Caucasus Institute analyzed the promises in the sphere of state
institutions and the legal system, including freedom of speech,
economy, education, social issues, healthcare and rural development.

She added that it was impossible to use internet resources only, as
some web pages contain outdated information. For instance, the website
of the Prosperous Armenia Party provides information of 2007. Some
parties created their websites on the threshold of the elections.

Therefore, the analysis included the politicians’ speeches and their
media coverage.

Iskandaryan also pointed out that in late April, on the threshold
of the elections, the promises of the parties considerably grew
in number. All the parties promised to support small and medium
businesses. Orinats Yerkir and Heritage parties promised to provide the
first grade pupils with free computers. Prosperous Armenia promised to
contribute to development of sport in the country, and Orinats Yerkir
promised to provide free education for the people with disabilities and
for their children. As regards the sphere of human rights, Heritage
promised to improve the freedom of speech in the press. The Armenian
National Congress promised to support the families that suffered
on 1 March 2008. The smallest number of promises and the smallest
figures were in the election program of the ruling Republican Party
of Armenia. Iskandaryan said that none of the parties presented the
mechanisms to combat shadow economy and monopoly. It is noteworthy that
the higher the post, the more promises the politicians gave, she said.

685 Accidents Registered Since Beginning Of 2012 In Armenia

685 ACCIDENTS REGISTERED SINCE BEGINNING OF 2012 IN ARMENIA

news.am
May 11, 2012 | 16:15

YEREVAN. – 685 accidents were registered since the beginning of this
year in Armenia, Road Police deputy head Hayk Sargsyan said at a
press conference on Friday.

According to him, 73 people died, 968 were injured. As compared to
the same period of last year, the accidents increased by 63 and 57
more people were injured in Armenia.

Regarding the capital city, the accidents reduced, having registered
275 accidents, as a result of which 17 died, 360 were injured. The
number is lower by 30 accidents, 7 deaths and 51 injured, as compared
to the same period of last year.

Road inspectors revealed 150,000 traffic violations and 48,000 through
surveillance and speedometers. As for the reports that police lessened
attention on security belts and telephone conversations while driving
a car, Sargsyan said it does not correspond to reality.

To note, majority of drivers prefer not to tighten the security belts.

Armenian Political Figure Forecasts No New Na’s Policy Toward Nagorn

ARMENIAN POLITICAL FIGURE FORECASTS NO NEW NA’S POLICY TOWARD NAGORNO-KARABAKH

tert.am
11.05.12

Larisa Alaverdyan, Armenia’s former human rights defender (ombudsman),
who is a member of Armenia’s parliament of the 4th convocation from the
Heritage party, does not expect anything positive from Armenia’s newly
elected parliament with respect to the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process.

“They are not going to do anything just as they have not done anything
so far, pleading the fact that, under Armenia’s Constitution, it is
the president that directs Armenia’s foreign policy,” Alaverdyan said.

“Even if any active steps are made, they are most likely to be
ritualistic ones,” Alaverdyan said.

Alaverdian has disagreed with the policy all the three Armenian
presidents have pursued in dealing with the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

“Not that the international community is supportive of Azerbaijan’s
aggressive policy. On the contrary, many nations are ready to
contribute to the triumph of justice. However, Armenia is not acting as
a partner in this process. Rather, it agrees to the Madrid principles,
which are unclear for me,” Alaverdyan said.

Elections Brought No Change – Heritage Rep.

ELECTIONS BROUGHT NO CHANGE – HERITAGE REP.

tert.am
11.05.12

The parliamentary elections brought absolutely no change as President
Serzh Sargsyan proved yet another time that he maintains all levers are
in his hands, Alaverdyan, a member of the opposition Heritage party,
has said.

“The incumbent president proved there is no dual power in the country,
with all levers being in his hands ahead of the presidential election.

The [ruling] Republican Party dominates the political arena, at least
for the time being,” she told reporters on Friday.

Alaverdyan, who is a member of the outgoing parliament, said the new
National Assembly will have two poles, both representing ruling forces.

“The society did not gain anything new, with the same regime being
in power,” she said, adding a race for power will be probably evident
in the new parliament.

As for the elections proper, Alaverdyan said she thinks positively
of the process.

“The civil society is little by little coming to realize that no
serious process is possible without its intervention,” she said,
referring to the bloggers’ community and the civil society’s broad
involvement in observation missions.

But the mission, according to Alaverdyan, continues to remain weak.

“We have had no progress in terms of effectiveness. The civil society
has to become more skilled to make its observation a legal fact,”
she said, noting that civil societies in progressive countries have
followed that path of development.

How We Can Hold The South Caucasus?

HOW WE CAN HOLD THE SOUTH CAUCASUS?

– May 12, 2012

Arevagal: The following article by the former Russian ambassador to
Armenia was written just before Moscow liberated South Ossetia and
Abkhazia from Georgian/Western aggression. The commentary by the
ambassador is a little insight into how Moscow views Armenia and its
role in the Caucasus. The article clearly suggests that Moscow was
feeling the urge to make a grande stand in the Caucasus. It also
reveals that it views Armenia as a natural ally that needs to be
preserved in the volatile region. Nevertheless, contrast the sound
geopolitical reasoning of what you will be reading below with what
high level American officials (not the ones that are tasked with
giving our naive people lip service) have been saying about Armenia…

While these unrecognized states, namely Abkhazia and Nagorno Karabakh,
are in danger of existence, there is wide disbelief that Russia has no
effective measures left to restrain the advance of the USA and its
allies on the post-Soviet terrain, which hurts Russia’s national and
state interests. So far, Russian has been carrying on with the
`mini-empires’, agreeing with their ridiculous proofs of `rights’ on
the lands of neighboring peoples. These lands, which, in reality,
until recently did not belong to them. I am confident that public and
policy statements on the highest levels defending the sovereign rights
of the smaller nations could spearhead negotiations between some
former Soviet republics and their former autonomies on the structure
of their new relations in a reasonable framework. But Moscow still
refuses to do that. Nevertheless it is about time to learn to
distinguish among the `real, true allies’, simply partner and those,
who look at the other side. We should not be afraid to offer support
to those whose interests coincide with ours.

It is significantly important to recognize that we are constantly
being provoked to argue and undermine our relationship with our
strategic allies. The Pro Azeri lobby in Moscow has been especially
active in these attempts, doing all they can to drive Russia away from
Armenia. These groups present the Turkish-oriented Azerbaijan as `the
Russian basis in the Caucasus.’ At the same time we are being
threatened with NATO military bases on Apsheron and a new war against
NKR, if the latter refuses to dissolve itself as an independent state
and accept sham autonomy within Azerbaijan. Pro Azeri lobbyists use
lies and scare tactics, hoping that our memories are short. Suddenly,
the infamous Mutalibov has remembered the `tragedy of Khodjali, when
in February of 1992 hundreds of civilians were slaughtered in Nagorno
Karabakh as a result of a joint operation of the Armenian military
groups and 366th motor-division of the Russian Army.’ But back in
1992, Mutalibov himself had admitted that `the tragedy of Khodjali’
was, in essence, a provocation carried out not by Armenians but by
Elchibei’s bandits against his presidency (see his interview for NG
April 2, 92). Why would Mutalibov remember the old lies of Elchibei
propaganda now? The answer is clear: to destroy Russian-Armenian
relations. Those feeding from the Azeri lobby push Moscow to help
Azerbaijan to fulfill their plans of annexing NKR territory.

The protanganists throw an oft-used theory of alleged `Pro Western’
orientation of the present Armenian government into the controversy.
Yet, the official Yerevan line simply tries to diversify its foreign
ties, which is a reasonable and most rational way of survival for
Armenia. In the current circumstances, Armenia needs neither `pro
Western’ nor `pro Russian’ orientation. But it needs a `pro Armenian’
one. Russia should understand these nuances, in which it is not able
to assist Armenia fully. For example, would Russia be capable of
sustaining and providing regular humanitarian aid, that amounts to
hundreds of millions of dollars, and which Armenia has been receiving
from the USA for the past ten years now? An honest appraisal will
ensure Russia’s stance in the South Caucasus. However, Russia still
has other measures to strengthen its positions in the Transcaucasus.
One of those is a military cooperation, including air defense and
border patrol. In that region, we have such presence only in Armenia.
Another lever is to own industrial and scientific property of
strategic economic and social importance in a country. Again Armenia
reappears, as we are currently conducting negotiations on these issues
with the state government. A third way is to effectively use the
patronage offered by Russia to the Armenians, in the Karabakh
question. This should be done without any fear of confrontation with
Turkish-Azeri pressure, conflicting with our interests, for it is
strongly connected with the far-fetched plans of pan-Turkism.

The words of the Russian President, uttered in Yerevan in September
2001, hold a special importance in light of these circumstances, i.e.:
`the whole policy of Russia in the region will be directed to provide
a reliable defense for Armenia;’ and that the solution of the Karabakh
problem should be coming out of the present status quo, by which
`Russia, should not disturb the established balance between Armenia
and Azerbaijan.’ I believe that to be the position conforming to the
Russian strategic interests. We should rid ourselves of the bad habit
of taking on trust everything that Azerbaijan says. Here, we do
business with a partner, who promises undying friendship to Moscow and
acts as a complete vassal of Turkey in Ankara and conductor of
pan-Turkism at home. Once we attempt to meet their interests and give
up Karabakh to them, they will not need us, for the pan Turkism
orientation of Baku is rooted deeply in its body.

All of this is not a call to stop having any business with Azerbaijan
and impose any sanctions on the country. There are about three million
citizens of Azerbaijan, who live and work in Russia. Some of them have
become Russian citizens. Moreover, Azerbaijan is our neighbor. A
neighbor should be treated in a friendly, neighborly way, despite the
fact that it behaves otherwise. It is important to promote trade,
cultural exchange and cooperation in possible and profitable areas.
Nonetheless, we should not close our eyes and ignore its true goals,
especially if they contradict the Russian interests. Armenia has been
our strategic ally from the beginning and until the present day.
Therefore we should act towards it in an appropriate fashion. We
should be considerate of Armenia’s interests and Karabakh’s interests,
for without Karabakh there is no independent and friendly Armenia.
Furthermore, without the Armenians, Russia would not have any
positions in Transcaucasus. My idea of Karabakh’s protectorate evolves
exactly from that logic: we simply ought to protect Karabakh, assist
in all possible ways to strengthen its security on its historical
territory; that had its borders distorted by the Russian Bolsheviks,
demanding restoration now. The entirety of NKR, deserves no lesser
respect than entirety of territories of any other state.

In my view, the true settling of the Karabakh conflict suggests
complete rejection by Azerbaijan of the primal Armenian lands. It is
possible to resolve the problem of the refugees by providing them with
opportunities in places where they live now. How come in almost every
discussion on Karabakh the only refugees that are being consistently
mentioned are the Azeri refugees? Why can’t the Armenians return to
Baku, Gyandja, Sumgait, Artsvashen, Getashen, etc.? It seems to me
that the most optimal resolution of the Karabakh problem is to
legitimize the status quo within the borders on the confrontation
lines, set by the truce of 1994. Aside from the war anything else is
simply unrealistic. Azerbaijan pretty much hopes for a war. However, a
war is not going to deliver anything good neither to the Armenians,
nor to the Azeri people.

http://www.armenianlife.com/2012/05/12/how-we-can-hold-the-south-caucasus/