Galust Sahakian Encourages Ter Petrosian’S Withdrawal

GALUST SAHAKIAN ENCOURAGES TER-PETROSSIAN’S WITHDRAWAL

A1+
26 June, 2008

"The police ruined the intentions of opposition," declared Deputy
Chairman of the Republican Party Galust Sahakian commenting on the
consent of the police to hold the rally of June 20 at the Matenadaran
square.

He was sure the opposition intended to cause conflicts.

"Opposition leaders neglected the presence of about 2000 people
and started the rally at 8:00 p.m. instead of 6:00 p.m. It was a
poorly-organized rally assembled from portions of previous public
meetings," Galust Sahakian expressed his viewpoint in the "Pastark"
Club overlooking the fact that the rally was delayed because the
police hindered the opposition to install the necessary equipment.

"Levon Ter-Petrossian will leave his position to more constructive
opposition leaders and will withdraw. Of course, I encourage such
attitude of his but I am not sure the society will agree to it,"
stated Galust Sahakian. However, his confidence was rather odd and
surprising as the first President had declared at the rally that he
would be the last person to give up politics.

SYSTEM OF A DOWN TO EUROVISION

SYSTEM OF A DOWN TO EUROVISION WITH ARMENIAN GENOCIDE THEME?

Gibrahayer
June 20, 2008

oikotimes.com – June 23 2008 – After Armenia received its best result
ever this year with Sirusho, the world-famous rock band System of
a Down has shown a keen interest in representing Armenia in Russia,
next year. However, the soloist of the American band, Serj Tankian,
has openly stated in a recent visit in Finland that this will be
under one condition: if they will be able to use Eurovision as a way
to make the much-debated Armenian Genocide issue known. "Eurovision
Song Contest would be an excellent way to make this theme known. We
must seriously think of this." said Tankian in response to a question
posed by Finnish News Agency.

System of a Down is very politically active and are noted for the
liberal political views expressed in their songs, tackling myriad
subjects including the War on Drugs, religion, drug use, and especially
censorship.

They have actively campaigned to get Turkey to recognise the
controversial Armenian Genocide and the subject is often-tackled
in their songs. They are also a part of the Axis of Justice, a
non-profit political activist organisation fighting for recognition
of the polemical issue, believed to have taken part in the early 20th
century. Ironically, the band has many Turkish fans as well.

Previously similar themes have been tried at Eurovision with mixed
success. In 1976 Greece sent the song Panaghia mou, Panaghia mou
about the invasion of Cyprus, in 1993 Bosnia-Herzegovina performed
Sva bol svijeta about the war in the region, and it is also believed
by experts that the 1996 United Kingdom entry Ohh Ahh Just a little
bit also has a hidden message about genocide.

With previous song titles such as Violent Pornography, This Cocaine
Makes Me Feel Like I’m On This Song, Peephole and Fuck the System,
System of a Down would perhaps be censored by the EBU rule a bout bad
language that previously forced Silvia Night to officially change the
lyrics of her song, while the EBU would probably choose to believe
the political message was a reference to ancient Armenian bedtime
stories or an ending relationship.

BAKU: Settlement Of NK Conflict Is Out Of Council Of Europe Competen

"SETTLEMENT OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT IS OUT OF COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMPETENCE" – SWEDEN’S FOREIGN MINISTER

Trend News Agency
June 24 2008
Azerbaijan

France, Strasburg, 24 June / TrendNews corr. A.Maharramli / Solution
of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is out of the Council of Europe
competence. This was said by Carl Bildt, Sweden’s Foreign Minister
and Chairman of the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers,
while answering to Azerbaijani MP Ganira Pashayeva’s question why
the Council of Europe did not demand from Armenia to liberate the
Azerbaijani lands.

"The negotiations to solve the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict underway. We should continue to hold
meetings of the two Presidents, who are able to speed up settlement
of the conflict," Bildt said.

According to Bildt, the Southern Caucasus is one of the regions to
cause concern in the Council of Europe. Acceptance of three countries
of the region to the Council of Europe resulted to reach a considerable
success in human rights, supremacy of law and performance of democratic
institutions.

"Solution of conflicts will be the way to prosperous and economically
developed region. I feel regret that conflicts take dominion in the
political life of these countries. These conflicts are out of our
competence. I would like to say that we pay a significant meaning to
Georgia’s territorial integrity, and there must not be a doubt that
Abkhazia will gain a broad autonomy. As, this may negatively affect
the situation in the region," Bildt stated.

Medvedev, Sargsyan To Discuss Karabakh Conflict

MEDVEDEV, SARGSYAN TO DISCUSS KARABAKH CONFLICT

PanARMENIAN.Net

23.06.2008

President Serzh Sargsyan of Armenia and Dmitry Medvedev of Russia
will discuss the Karabakh conflict settlement, a source in Kremlin
told RIA Novosti.

"Russia’s position is unchangeable. We will help the sides to find an
acceptable solution to the conflict," the source said. "The Presidents
will also refer to the international agenda."

Serzh Sargsyan is in Moscow for a formal 2-day visit on invitation
of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.

President Sargsyan is also scheduled to meet with Russia’s Prime
Minister Vladimir Putin, Federation Council Chairman Sergei Mironov
and State Duma Speaker Boris Gryzlov.

He is also expected to lay a wreath to the Unknown Soldier’s Tomb
and meet with representatives of the Armenian community.

BAKU: Material losses of Armenia during Nagorno Karabakh conflict

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
June 21 2008

Elmira Suleymanova: `Material losses of Armenia during Nagorno
Karabakh conflict is incomparable with losses of Azerbaijan’

[ 21 Jun 2008 12:10 ]

Baku. Tamara Grigoryeva-APA. `Material losses of Armenia during
Nagorno Karabakh conflict is incomparable with losses of Azerbaijan’,
Ombudsman Elmira Suleymanova said while commenting on reports spread
by Armenian Migration Service that Armenians leaving Azerbaijan during
the conflict had $5mln material losses.

Suleymanova noted that Armenians leaving Azerbaijan had sold their
houses, but Azerbaijani refugees had not such chances. `Azerbaijan’s
damage assessments were $6bln. Our moral losses were more than
material losses’, she said.

Baku: Aliyev: "Azerbaijan’S Only Problem Is Non-Solution To Nagorno

ILHAM ALIYEV: "AZERBAIJAN’S ONLY PROBLEM IS NON-SOLUTION TO NAGORNO KARABAKH CONFLICT YET"

Azeri Press Agency
June 19 2008
Azerbaijan

Baku. Elbrus Seyfullayev-APA. "Azerbaijan has only problem and it is
non-solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict yet, which is a source of
threat to whole region.

We hold peace talks, but no results have been achieved yet", said
President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev in his address to the special
meeting of Milli Majlis on June 19 dedicated to 90th anniversary
of Azerbaijani Parliament. The President said four UN resolutions
on the liberation of Azerbaijani lands had not been implemented
yet. "Recently UN General Assembly adopted resolution on the
situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan and supported
Azerbaijan’s position. Organization of the Islamic Conference,
Council of Europe, OSCE and other international organizations
also support Azerbaijan. Unfortunately there is no result despite
all these efforts. One million Azerbaijani refugees and internally
displaced persons were deprived of the elementary Human Rights". The
President said Azerbaijan’s cultural heritage, historical monuments
and cemeteries had been destroyed in the occupied territories, but
the international community remained indifferent attitude to all
these developments. "All countries should obey the international
law. Otherwise it will be impossible to secure the international
law. The international organizations should respect themselves". Ilham
Aliyev said Azerbaijan would secure its territorial integrity. "Our
concession in the solution of this problem is the giving of highest
administration right to Nagorno Karabakh. Nagorno Karabakh conflict
is a threat not only to Azerbaijan, but to entire region. Azerbaijan
has achieved successes in all spheres and international law is in our
favor. We believe that the problem will find its peaceful solution".

Let’s Wait Till Monday

LET’S WAIT TILL MONDAY

Hayots Ashkhar Daily
Published on June 18, 2008
Armenia

After yesterday’s meeting with the parliamentary factions, JORGE
COLUMBIER, co-rapporteur of the PACE monitoring group, avoided
informing the correspondent of "Hayots Ashkharh" about his impressions
of the information he had received.

With diplomatic courtesy, he offered us to wait till Monday, "We still
have to return to Strasburg and participate in the regular session
of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. There,
we are going to present the whole information on the internal
political developments and the current situation, in addition to
our observations.

All this will allow us to consider, together with our partners,
whether it is necessary to initiate a debate on Armenia during the
session of the Assembly."

Sen. Obama Urges Bush Administration To Change Position On Armenian

SEN. OBAMA URGES BUSH ADMINISTRATION TO CHANGE POSITION ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
18.06.2008 14:40 GMT+04:00

With the Senate Foreign Relations Committee set to consider
U.S. Ambassador to Armenia nominee Marie Yovanovitch at a confirmation
hearing on Thursday, presumptive Democratic presidential nominee
Barack Obama restated his commitment to U.S.

recognition of the Armenian Genocide, the Armenian National Committee
of America (ANCA) Communications Director Elizabeth Chouldjian told
PanARMENIAN.Net.

In a June 16th letter to ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian, Sen. Obama wrote,
"I share your view that the United States must recognize the events of
1915 to 1923, carried out by the Ottoman Empire, as Genocide. . . We
must recognize this tragic reality. The Bush Administration’s refusal
to do so is inexcusable. I will continue to speak out in an effort
to move the Administration to change its position."

Social Justice: Heed Chilling Warning

SOCIAL JUSTICE: HEED CHILLING WARNING
By Allan Shanoff, [email protected]

Law Times
=com_content&task=view&id=4111&Itemid= 82
June 16 2008
Canada

As a lawyer with 30 years of practice acting for media clients, it
saddened me to read about the spectacle in Vancouver earlier this
month where the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal parsed the
content of a cover story published in Maclean’s magazine.

The cover of the magazine read, "Why the future belongs to Islam"
and "The Muslim world has youth, numbers and global ambition. The
West is old, barren and exhausted. Mark Steyn maps the new world
order." Inside was a short excerpt from Steyn’s bestselling book.

Under human rights codes anybody can file a complaint. In this case
it was Naiyer Habib and Mohamed Elmasry, both Muslim activists and
members of the Ontario-based Canadian Islamic Congress.

They filed in British Columbia, presumably because of the breadth
of the B.C. Human Rights Code, which prohibits any publication or
statement that "is likely to expose a person or a group or class of
persons to hatred or contempt because of the race, colour, ancestry,
place of origin religion . . . of that person or that group or class
of persons."

Saskatchewan has an even broader provision prohibiting publications
that tend to expose a person or class of persons to hatred "or
ridicules, belittles or otherwise affronts the dignity of any person
or class of persons on the basis of a prohibited ground" but there
is a freedom of expression declaration in the Saskatchewan code.

The federal code covers internet postings and captures "any matter
that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt
by reason that that person or persons are identifiable on the basis
of a prohibited ground of discrimination."

Aside from the vagueness of the language in these codes and the
prospect of forum shopping, there are a myriad of problems with
these provisions.

The intention of the publisher is irrelevant. It matters not that,
for example, the controversial Danish cartoons are published to show
what led to the recent bombing of the Danish Embassy in Pakistan.

Complainants needn’t reside in or have any real connection in the
province in which complaints are filed, nor are they required to
testify or subject themselves to cross-examination. Indeed they need
not attend the hearings they initiated, even though they have become
self-appointed class action representatives and spokespersons for
entire communities.

Truth is not a defence. That’s right. It’s not even a relevant
consideration. Having an honest belief in the truth of an item is
not a defence. Why should it, if truth is irrelevant?

Fair comment is not a defence. Nope, not even close.

There is no prohibition on a multiplicity of proceedings. Complainants
may file complaints in more than one jurisdiction — indeed
complaints in respect of the same Maclean’s item were filed in three
jurisdictions.

Evidence from racism experts can be led to establish the underlying
meaning of the words published. It doesn’t matter what the publisher
meant; what is important is what an expert says the words meant and the
impact created by those words. And just how does one become qualified
as an expert in racism?

That’s up to the tribunals. Of course the tribunals are not required
to follow the rules of evidence and they can accept as an expert
anyone they wish — in this case they accepted a PhD in journalism and
communications. Oh, and forget about any coherent rules of evidence.

Provinces with no jurisdiction over publications may still accept
complaints, and there is nothing to stop any of these commissions
from condemning an item as racist while at the same time declining
jurisdiction — all this without holding a hearing. Indeed, that’s
what happened to Maclean’s in Ontario.

The spectre of the Maclean’s case is chilling. Win or lose,
publications, whether large or small, will engage in subconscious
self-censorship. Smaller publications or publications with limited
resources will surely engage in conscious self-censorship.

How is an editor to know what might or might not offend the
sensibilities of any identifiable group? Any controversial statements
about any religion or race are potentially subject to sanction if
anybody finds them offensive. Writing about Chinese treatment of
Tibetans or Tiananmen Square may offend some Chinese.

Writing about the Armenian genocide may offend some Turkish. Writing
about the Holocaust may offend some Germans. Earlier this month
al-Qaeda took credit for the bombing of a Danish Embassy in Pakistan.

Ridiculous as it may sound, there would be nothing stop the B.C. HR
Tribunal from entertaining a complaint from an al-Qaeda supporter in
respect of an editorial condemning al-Qaeda for the bombing.

As a media law lawyer, I was often asked to give advice on the risks
of publishing letters to the editor.

Sometimes the letters expressed a narrow-minded view towards
identifiable groups. I always cautioned my clients about potential
risks but concluded that the risks were minimal and that it was
important for the newspapers to publish the letters so that the public
could be educated on the bigotry that existed in their communities.

Even though some people might be offended by the letters, I felt
that there was a greater good in having bigotry exposed and I knew
that the letters would spark healthy public debate. No longer would
I dare give such advice.

As Julian Porter, counsel to Maclean’s said in his closing argument to
the B.C. HR Tribunal, "Beware." That chilling warning must be heeded.

http://www.lawtimesnews.com/index.php?option

Paradise Lost Smyrna: The Destruction of Islam’s City of Tolerance

Paradise Lost Smyrna 1922: The Destruction of Islam’s City of Tolerance
by Giles Milton
A powerful account of one of the most horrific humanitarian disasters
of the 20th century

The Sunday Times/UK
June 15, 2008

The Sunday Times review by William Dalrymple

For centuries, the great city of Smyrna was a European foothold on the
Anatolian coast. The British Levantine Company had had a factory there
since 1667, trading in raisins and carpets, and even then the place was
renowned for its lively social life. Francesco Lupazzoli, the priapic
Venetian consul, lived on a diet of fruit, bread and water and a few
slices of unseasoned meat, yet survived until the age of 114, and
fathered 126 children on his five wives and innumerable Smyrniot
mistresses.

By the end of the 19th century, Smyrna had grown into one of the
largest, richest and most cosmopolitan cities in the Mediterranean. It
contained large Armenian and Jewish communities, plus at least twice as
many Greeks as then lived in Athens. There were 11 Greek newspapers
available in the city, as well as seven in Turkish, five in Armenian,
four in French and five in Hebrew. Smyrna was also home to a collection
of amazingly rich Anglo-Levantine families. The Girauds owned the
Oriental Carpet Manufacturing Company, which employed 150,000 people,
while the Whittalls controlled an even larger fruit exporting empire.
These clans inhabited vast palaces and were serviced by a string of
opera houses, theatres, department stores and brasseries. According to
one visitor, even their hair salons `were reminiscent of ballrooms’.
There were no fewer than 17 companies dealing with Parisian luxuries
for these families. It is the lives of these dynasties, recorded in
their diaries and letters, that form the focus for Giles Milton’s
brilliant re-creation of the last days of Smyrna.

In the course of the late 19th century, the Ottoman empire lurched from
disaster to disaster, slowly and bloodily shedding its Greek, Bulgarian
and Egyptian fringes. To make matters worse, it backed the wrong side
in the first world war, thus losing its remaining possessions in the
Hejaz, Palestine and Syria. Yet through all this, Smyrna flourished as
if on a separate planet. Protected by Rahmi Bey, its liberal Ottoman
governor, Smyrna continued to prosper while nearby the caliphate
collapsed, the Armenians were led off to their genocide and allied
troops died in their tens of thousands trying to capture Gallipoli.
Pictures taken in 1917 show the Smyrna Opera packed to bursting with
Edwardian gentlemen in black tie, enjoying Rigoletto only a few miles
from the landing beaches where so many of their compatriots had died.

Then quite suddenly, in 1922, four years after the end of the first
world war, Smyrna was snuffed out in a single week of mass-murder,
rape, looting, pillage and one of the greatest acts of arson in the
20th century. At the end of it, the New York Times ran the headline:
`Smyrna wiped out.’ As Milton points out: `It was not hyperbole; it was
a bold statement of fact.’

Britain played an important role in this disaster. Lloyd George hated
Muslims, and especially the Turks. In the course of the Paris
conference, at the same time as he casually handed over Palestine (then
90% Arab) to the Zionist movement, he encouraged the ambitions of his
friend Eleftherios Venizelos, the prime minister of Greece, to annex
chunks of Anatolia. When Venizelos dined at Downing Street, Lloyd
George proposed the toast: `May the Turk be turned out of Europe and
sent to . . . where he came from.’ Lord Curzon agreed: `For more than
five centuries, the presence of the Turk in Europe has been a source of
distraction, intrigue, and corruption . . . Let not this occasion be
missed of purging the earth of one of its most pestilent roots of
evil.’

In 1919, while the Paris peace conference continued its deliberations
on the future of the Middle East, Greek troops landed in Smyrna under
British protection. Blessed by the Greek bishop Metropolitan
Chrysostom, they began committing atrocities against the city’s Turkish
inhabitants, killing large numbers of unarmed citizens. The Greek army
then advanced inland, and was soon pushing back Mustafa Kemal Ataturk’s
new Turkish Republican army.

Lloyd George dismissed Ataturk as a `carpet seller in a bazaar . . .
[given to] unnatural sexual intercourse’, yet the Turkish leader was
more than a match for the Greeks. Arming his troops with weapons
procured from Italy and France, both of whom distrusted this
Anglo-Greek imperial project, Ataturk stalled the Greek offensive, and
cut off their supply lines with his cavalry. By August 1922, the Greeks
were in chaotic retreat, committing further atrocities as they
staggered back to the Mediterranean. It was Smyrna that paid the price
for British and Greek miscalculations. When the Turks entered the city
on September 9, few doubted they would take revenge for what had been
done to them. Few, however, guessed the scale of the horrors that would
be meted out on the city. Estimates vary but some suggest that by the
end of the mayhem 100,000 people had been killed, with many times that
number turned into homeless refugees.

Perhaps the only flaw in Milton’s powerful and moving narrative is the
degree to which he depicts Smyrna as somehow an exceptional case: as
the book’s subtitle has it, he believes he is writing about `the
destruction of Islam’s city of tolerance’. In reality, both the
pre-first-world-war tolerance, and the bloody fragmentation of that
multicultural world as the empire collapsed, were part of a wider
pattern across Ottoman lands. What is true of Smyrna was equally true
of Salonica, Istanbul, Alexandria and Jaffa. For across the Ottoman
world, eastern Christians, Jews and Muslims lived side by side for
nearly one and a half millenniums. By modern standards, the Christians
and Jews (the dhimmi) were often treated as second-class citizens, but
it was at least a kind of pluralist equilibrium that had no parallel in
Europe until the 1950s.

What one historian has called this hybrid `multiconfessional,
extraordinarily polyglot Ottoman’ multiculturalism where even
`bootblacks commanded a working knowledge of six or seven languages’
survived until European ideas of the nation state shattered the mosaic
in the early 20th century. Across the Ottoman empire, the century saw
the bloody unravelling of that tapestry – most recently in Kosovo and
Bosnia, but before that in Cyprus, Palestine, Greece and Anatolia. In
each,pluralism was replaced by a savage polarisation as minorities fled
or were driven to places where they could be majorities.

Milton has written a grimly memorable book about one of the most
important events in this process. It is well paced, even-handed and
cleverly focused: through the prism of the Anglo-Levantines, he
reconstructs both the prewar Edwardian glory of Smyrna and its tragic
end. He also clears up, once and for all, who burnt Smyrna, producing
irrefutable evidence that the Turkish army brought in thousands of
barrels from the Petroleum Company of Smyrna and poured them over the
streets and houses of all but the Turkish quarter. Moreover, it is
clear that it was done with the full approval of Ataturk, who was
determined to find a final solution to his `minority problem’ to ensure
the future stability of his fledgling Turkish republic. A relatively
homogenous Turkish nation state was indeed achieved; but as Milton
shows, the cost was suffering on an almost unimaginable scale and one
of the most horrific humanitarian disasters of the 20th century.

Paradise Lost Smyrna 1922: The Destruction of Islam’s City of
Tolerance, by Giles Milton

Sceptre £20 pp426

Buy from Books First for £15.29 with free delivery in the UK