The Kindness Of Strangers

THE KINDNESS OF STRANGERS
by Ina Friedman

The Jerusalem Report
March 19, 2007

When I discovered that, because they could not travel freely around the
country, the refugees from Darfur and other parts of Sudan had never
been to Jerusalem (see "Forgotten Lessons," February 5, 2007), I called
my brother, Steve, and offered him an opportunity to do a mitzvah.

A systems engineer by profession, at age 67 he had just embarked on a
second career as a licensed tour guide, and he immediately volunteered
to lead these unusual guests, who have been released from prison to
the custody of kibbutzim and moshavim around the country, on a day’s
outing in the holy city.

Organized by a volunteer from the Hotline for Migrant Workers, the
day did not begin auspiciously, as the bus bringing them to Jerusalem
arrived three hours late. But no matter: Good cheer prevailed as we
set off on a lightning tour of West Jerusalem on the way to our main
target: the Old City.

The planning, on Steve’s part, had entailed no little angst. We
desperately wanted to ensure that these 25 accidental tourists,
all but two of whom are Muslims, would be able to enter the Haram
a-Sharif (Temple Mount) and visit the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa
Mosques. But because they lack passports and other official papers,
we feared they would never get past the Israeli security guards
near the entrance to the Mughrabi Gate – the only one through which
Jewish Israelis and foreign tourists can access the mount. And then
the whole issue became academic, as the Mughrabi Gate was closed in
early February due to the unrest sparked by the excavations below it.

The alternative was for the majority of the group to reach the
esplanade through one of the gates in the Muslim Quarter, as all
Muslims are permitted to do. Steve had in fact contacted a few Arab
colleagues who lead tours on the Haram, asking whether they would
fill in for him there. But they asked for fees beyond our modest
means. Then, three days before the tour, the Mughrabi Gate opened
again, and he was told that visiting hours were between 1 and 2:30 p.m.

So we drove up to the Mount of Olives, with its spectacular view of
the Old City, for the nutshell version of Jerusalem’s complex history
and arrived at the Mughrabi guard post at 1:25 – only to discover
that the entry hours are actually 12-1:30. No exceptions.

Eschewing despair, after a felafel lunch we made our way to the Cotton
Market Gate in the Muslim Quarter to try our luck there.

Strategizing along the way, I suggested that we Israelis lay low and
allow the Sudanese, all Arabic-speaking black Africans, to negotiate
their entry to the Haram on their own.

But at the gate, when we happened |upon an affable Arab guide who
gave his name only as Majid, my brother told him the whole story. As
afternoon prayers were about to begin, to verify that these visitors
were indeed Muslims, Majid asked one of them to recite the opening
passage of the Koran and then took the rest on good faith. He calmed
us about his fee by saying, "Don’t worry, we here are good Muslims"
(and in fact, we later learned, asked for only a token five shekels,
just over $1, apiece).

As we waited for them by the gate, seated on low stools outside a
caf? and one of the two Christians in the group smoking a nargileh,
Steve received his earthly reward by talking about the nooks and
crannies of the Old City with a young, Jerusalem-born researcher from
Al Quds University, whose office is nearby. (Purely by coincidence,
his family hailed from Chad, to which many Darfur refugees have fled,
and his father had come to Jerusalem, via Jordan, after making the
hajj pilgrimage to Mecca.) Our luck held as we arrived at the Church
of the Holy Sepulcher just in time for Vespers, organ and all.

But it changed when we emerged from the market and the heavens opened
in a downpour – a contingency for which we had not come prepared.

Still, we had one more stop to make. In the vestibule of St. James’
Church, in the Armenian Quarter, Steve talked to these survivors of
mass murder about the Armenian genocide. He hoped to give them heart by
explaining that two other peoples that populate Jerusalem’s Old City,
Armenians and Jews, had endured horrors parallel to their own and
rebuilt their lives as sovereign nations. As he took all this in, the
English-speaking Armenian guard had no idea who these strangers were.

Yet as we turned to leave, he could not stop thanking them for their
kindness in stopping to pay tribute to the suffering of his people.

Grebyonkina-Azroyan Figure Skaters Leave For Tokyo

GREBYONKINA-AZROYAN FIGURE SKATERS LEAVE FOR TOKYO

Panorama.am
16:48 19/03/2007

Figure skaters, representing Armenia, are in Tokyo to participate in
world championship in figure skating on March 18.

Anastasia Grebionkina-Vazgen Azroyan dance couple, representing
Armenia, left for Tokyo on March 18 from Moscow. Armenian figure
skating federation told Armenpress that our figure skaters are in good
sports state. Alexander Julin, figure skating coach of our sportsmen,
Liudmila Vlasova, dance coach as well as Irina Absaliamova, field
judge of international ranking, also left for Tokyo.

The competition will end on March 28.

Millennium Challenge Program in Armenia may be stopped

PanARMENIAN.Net

Millennium Challenge Program in Armenia may be stopped

16.03.2007 17:50 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Millennium Challenge Program in Armenia may be
stopped if big problems are witnessed in the republic, for example if
election is declared invalid, postponed or cancelled,’ said John
Danilovich, Chief Executive Officer of the Millennium Challenge
Corporation. `I am hopeful that there will happen nothing of the kind
in the near future. A month ago I had a conversation with Armenian
President Robert Kocharian,’ he said. When asked by Congressman
Knollenberg whether recall of funds allocated to Armenia is possible,
Mr Danilovich said, `The allocated funds are not subject to
return. The money is spent immediately upon going into the program,
reports RFE/RL.

The U.S. government is expected to allot $235 million to Armenia for
fiscal 2008.

Armenian American finds joy in helping homeland

PRESS OFFICE
Fund for Armenian Relief (FAR)
630 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 889-5150; Fax: (212) 889-4849
E-mail: [email protected]
Website:

March 16, 2007
___________________

COMPUTER EXPERT FROM TEXAS HEADS TO ARMENIA TO EMPOWER NEXT GENERATION

Jason Kazarian is a third-generation Armenian-American living in Dallas,
Texas. But he’s empowering the next generation of Armenians halfway around
the world in order for them to build a better future for the motherland.

He’s using his knowledge of cutting-edge technology to teach at the Gyumri
Information Technology Center (a program created by the Fund for Armenian
Relief (FAR) in partnership with Enterprise Incubator Foundation and
Armenian American entrepreneurs Zabel Vassilian and Patrick Sarkissian) to
improve the economic situation of northern Armenia.

CREATING OPPORTUNITY

He didn’t set out to visit Armenia, let alone go there to teach for two
weeks, it was really almost accidental. A parishioner at the St. Sarkis
Armenian Church of Dallas, Kazarian sometimes attends services organized by
the mission parish in Austin.

Last year Dn. Ken Maranian of Austin went on the Young Professionals Trip to
Armenia organized by FAR. He sent out an e-mail to the Armenian community
in Texas describing the programs operated by FAR which give hope,
opportunity, and empowerment to the citizens of Armenia. One of those
programs was the Gyumri Information Technology Center (GITC).

Launched in 2005, the GITC develops employment opportunities in the
earthquake zone by training students and linking U.S. IT companies to Gyumri
graduates. With more than 20 years of professional experience in software
and systems engineering, Kazarian was interested in the GITC when Maranian
described it.

In July 2006, Kazarian dashed off an email to FAR and soon was writing back
and forth to the director and staff of the GITC trying to ascertain the
needs of the center’s students. The staff wanted someone to help teach
Linux and Oracle, and Kazarian had both the skills and desire to teach.

So, without even speaking Armenian, he headed off to give of his time and
skills by leading a 12-day, intensive series of classes in Armenia.

PERSONAL CONNECTION

At first, his decision was greeted with suspicion from his family, who had
never been to Armenia, and friends who hadn’t been there recently.

"When I talked to people in church who went to Armenia maybe five years ago,
they warned me to be prepared for something unsavory. But I found most of
their fears were unwarranted," he said. "The Diaspora forgets Armenia has
been independent for 15 years. Things have greatly improved in that time."

He has taught various classes in the United States, including specialized
in-house training for development and engineering firms such as
Alcatel-Lucent, NASA, and Raytheon. He has also been a guest lecturer at
California State University. In Armenia there were some translation issues,
especially with technical terminology. But the students were eager to
learn.

"The hunger for knowledge was more than I expected," Kazarian said. "The
students in the U.S. are interested, but the students at the GITC wanted to
know in excruciating detail every subtle part of the course. They had
questions about why things were. They wanted to really know. In the U.S.,
I might say there’s an algorithm and people are satisfied. The students in
Gyumri wanted to know how the algorithm worked."

EMPOWERING THE FUTURE

Kazarian said the capabilities and interest of the students in Armenia far
exceeded his expectations. In fact, with his students’ strong desire for
more, his teaching didn’t end after he left Armenia.

Using Skype, an Internet-based teleconferencing program, he began teaching a
new systems development course in February. This course, which will run
through June, is a unique program in the region.

It is a senior seminar in which students team up to build a functioning
software product, in this case a registration database for the GITC. They
will go through all phases of the product lifestyle: identifying customer
requirements, designing and developing their software solution, and testing
the finished product.

The course is designed to teach beyond the classroom environment, placing
students into a real world challenge and push their capabilities beyond
their comfort zone.

The new class is designed to give the students the skills and experiences
they need to work in the highly competitive IT industry, bringing needed
income to the Gyumri region. Already 10 graduates have found jobs, many
with entrepreneurs who have successful IT firms in Yerevan. With the
quality of students found at the GITC, these businessmen are going where the
talent is and opening branch offices in Gyumri.

"The students are willing to do work if we give it to them," Kazarian said.
"And now they can go into interviews and say ‘I’ve actually done this.’"

Each year the GITC, a one-room school with no full-time faculty, has to turn
down applicants who want to empower themselves and build a better future for
their families and community.

Thanks to professionals such as Kazarian, the GITC is able to offer its
students a cutting-edge education. And for Kazarian the experience of
traveling halfway around the world to teach was a profoundly deep one.

"Not that I intend to in the near or not too near future, but I can die
happy now. I’ve actually done something that is essentially a life’s work,"
he said emotionally. "You listen to Americans complain about how terrible
things are. You go to Armenia and see what it is like and what we Americans
take for granted. Then you can’t complain."

"It is gratifying to be able to do something for people who appreciate the
work you’re doing and the effort and time you’re giving," he added.
"They’re so hungry and thirsty for knowledge. And I’m thrilled I’m teaching
something that is cutting-edge and of great benefit to northern Armenia.
And it is something I never thought about doing, but after a click on a web
page and e-mails back and forth look what happened."

He encourages other IT professionals to give back by teaching classes in
Armenia. Interested individuals can contact FAR through its website,
or simply call 212-889-5150.

"We’ve got to start giving back," Kazarian said. "This is a new future for
Armenia."

— 3/16/07

PHOTO CAPTION: Some of the students building a better future for themselves
and their families by studying at FAR’s Gyumri Information Technology
Center, which was established to give the young people of the impoverished,
earthquake damaged region increased job opportunities.

www.farusa.org
www.farusa.org

Russian Journalist: There is Lack of Inf About Armenia in Rusia

IN RUSSIAN JOURNALIST’S WORDS, THERE IS LACK OF INFORMATION ABOUT
ARMENIA IN RUSSIA

YEREVAN, MARCH 16, NOYAN TAPAN. In spite of strong contacts between
the two countries, there is lack of information about Armenia in
Russia. Alan Kasamov, Director of RIA-Novosti agency’s CIS and Baltic
countries’ department, stated this at the March 16 press conference.

In his words, Russian media do not set themselves the task to fill up
that gap. He advised Armenian media to inform more actively Russian
citizens about Armenia, especially as there are 1.5-2 mln Armenians
among them. A. Kasamov also said that information like any other
goods should be packed up well and provided to the buyer.

Answering NT correspondent’s question, he said that Russian printed
and electronic media unequivocally express negative attitude to
manifestations of xenophobia in Russia. At the same time, A. Kasamov
said that any Russian media can be blamed for giving opportunity of
expression for opinions of xenophobia, showing neutral attitude to
such cases or not very actively agitating tolerance to other nations.

In A. Kasamov’s words, dozens of NGOs uniting Armenians function in
Russia, which can apply to the court with any fact of xenophobia in
Russian media.

Wrong Resolution On Turkish Killings

WRONG RESOLUTION ON TURKISH KILLINGS
By Kenneth Ballen

Baltimore Sun, MD
March 15 2007

Rarely does Congress exclusively hold the key to America’s foreign
relations with a critical ally. But now, with Turkey, the only
Muslim country allied with the United States in NATO, the future of
Turkish-American relations is solely in the hands of Congress.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has pledged to bring before the House next
month a congressional resolution formally recognizing as organized
genocide the mass killings of Armenians from 1915 to 1923 in Turkey’s
predecessor state of the Ottoman Empire. Ms. Pelosi strongly supports
the resolution, and it now appears likely to be approved.

According to a new nationwide public opinion survey of Turkey recently
conducted by Terror Free Tomorrow, the nonprofit organization I lead,
congressional passage of this resolution would set back the cause
it purports to achieve, namely Turkey’s recognition of its past and
reconciliation with Armenia today.

The courageous Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, who was
assassinated for trying to promote reconciliation just two weeks
before our survey, believed that the key for Armenians was Turkish
public opinion, saying: "The winning of the empathy and compassion
of the Turkish population is far more important than the adoption of
Armenian resolutions in hundreds of parliaments elsewhere."

Our survey proves Mr. Dink right. Rather than win Turkish empathy,
the forthcoming resolution from Congress would harden public attitudes
in Turkey – and likely in Armenia as well.

Indeed, the feelings of the Turkish people on this issue run deep –
78 percent of Turks oppose the resolution, and three-quarters feel
that passage will worsen their opinion of the United States.

In our survey of 1,021 Turks 18 and older, only one-fifth of them
expressed a favorable opinion of the U.S. But even among those
Turks who now have a favorable opinion toward America, four-fifths
responded that their opinion would deteriorate if the resolution were
to pass. These attitudes could lead anti-American feelings in Turkey
to the abyss. Seventy-nine percent of Turks favor strong action by
the Turkish government if an Armenian resolution passes, including
suspension of diplomatic relations with the U.S. and boycotting
American products.

Critically, Turks surveyed feel so powerfully about this issue that
should the resolution pass, 83 percent would oppose Turkey assisting
the U.S. in neighboring Iraq.

The reasons for Turkish opinion have less to do with the issue of
recognizing the mass killings of Armenians as genocide than with
outside American political judgment of Turkish history. In fact,
three-quarters of all Turks would accept scholarship by independent
historians on what occurred between Turks and Armenians.

The problem for most Turks is that they do not consider the U.S.
Congress a neutral judge. Instead, Turks largely see the resolution
as driven by anti-Muslim feelings and American domestic politics.

At this moment, when opinion of the U.S. is at a nadir throughout
the Muslim world, Congress is poised to further alienate one of our
few democratic Muslim allies.

If the goal of the congressional resolution is to promote
reconciliation between Turkey and Armenia today, its proponents should
be aware that 73 percent of Turks think the resolution will have the
opposite effect.

Yes, the genocide of innocent Armenian civilians in the waning days
of the Ottoman Empire must be universally acknowledged – even if
condemning the mass killings as genocide provokes the ire of most
Turks. That fact must never be the issue.

But how can Congress best help our ally, Turkey, to acknowledge the
wrongs of its past while advancing reconciliation with Armenia in
the present?

The task should be the one Hrant Dink gave his life for: to help
promote a neutral, independent and credible mechanism that can further
reconciliation while recognizing past wrongs. That neutral forum
should include not only expert historians, legal scholars and political
leaders from Turkey and Armenia but also similar representatives from
other countries that have successfully confronted their histories,
such as Germany and South Africa.

The momentous issue of genocide demands no less than a response
designed to lead to true recognition and reconciliation.

Kenneth Ballen prosecuted international terrorists and served as
counsel to the House Iran-Contra Committee. He is president of Terror
Free Tomorrow, a nonprofit organization in Washington. His e-mail
is [email protected].

imoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.turkey15mar1 5,0,1173034.story?coll=bal-oped-headlines

http://www.balt

Turkey’s Post-Assassination Con Games

TURKEY’S POST-ASSASSINATION CON GAMES
By David B. Boyajian – a freelance writer based in Massachusetts in the USA

Noyan Tapan
March 15 2007

Make no mistake: Turkey and its friends are turning the assassination
of journalist and human rights activist Hrant Dink to their advantage.

With few exceptions, the international community and media have put
most of the blame on the destructive atmosphere created by Turkish
"nationalists" and "ultra-nationalists."

True, Prime Minister Recep Erdogan and his Islamic AKP Party came
in for some criticism, but only because these allegedly "moderate,"
"reformist" sweethearts were supposedly not standing up to the big,
bad "nationalists."

It’s the old "good cop – bad cop" routine: We’re now all supposed to
trust the "good cops," Erdogan and the AKP.

Never mind that the AKP is a strongly conservative, right-of-center
– hence nationalist – political party. Never mind that it was an
AKP-majority parliament that enacted Article 301, the law against
"denigrating Turkishness" under which Dink had been convicted.

Never mind that Erdogan has called for a beefed-up campaign of
Genocide denial. Never mind that he’s dispatching AKP member and
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul and AKP parliamentarians to the U.S. to
demand that Congress defeat the Armenian Genocide resolution.

Con Games

Another con game that Turkey’s friends are playing goes like this:
‘Yes, Dink’s murder was unfortunate. But it’s just a bump in Turkey’s
road to reform.

The Turkish government needs your sympathy and the help of the European
Union (EU) more than ever.’

That’s no exaggeration. Read part of the EU’s reaction to the slaying:
"Turkey will steadfastly continue along the path towards … freedom
of expression."

And like much of the media, the Wall Street Journal Europe remained
in a state of denial: "Turkey’s democracy is as healthy and vibrant
… as never before." Fascinating. Assassinations and prosecutions
of dissidents are apparently signs of political health.

Count on the West to continue babbling about "reforming" Turkey while
providing it ever more political support, money, and weapons.

Not Just 301

Governments and media worldwide are attempting another
post-assassination con job by calling for repeal of Article 301,
as if that would be a cure-all.

As if prior to 2005, when 301 was enacted, Turkey was a shining
example of freedom.

Turkey has long had numerous laws that stifle dissent. Laws against
separatism, for instance, are used to prosecute Kurdish political
activity. And Article 216, which outlaws "enmity … towards
another group," is currently used against those who acknowledge the
Genocide. Even Turks point out that the government has plenty of laws
it can use if 301 is repealed.

For some Armenians, Dink’s huge funeral march of Turks, Armenians,
Kurds, and others, stirred hopes for cooperation and reform.

The march was mainly about Turkish civil rights in general, however,
not necessarily Genocide acknowledgment or Armenia. Moreover, nearly
200 years of Turkish "reforms" have proven disastrous for Armenians.

Reform’s Tragedies

Turkey’s Tanzimat decrees of 1839 and 1856 promised equality for all
Ottoman citizens, including Armenians. They were largely failures.

The Ottoman Armenian National Constitution, approved in 1863,
did little to improve the lives of ordinary Armenians. The Turkish
Constitution was suspended soon after it was proclaimed in 1876.

The Treaty of Berlin (1878) promised European oversight of reforms
in the Armenian provinces. It, too, failed. Continuing "reforms"
culminated in the 1890’s massacres of 300,000 Armenians.

In 1908, the empire’s Armenians, Turks, and other ethnic groups raised
banners hailing the "reformist" Young Turk revolution and literally
embraced in the streets. Somewhat like the Dink funeral procession.

The following year saw 30,000 Armenians slaughtered in Adana. Eerily
similar to what Erdogan would do 98 years later, the Young Turks
apologized – insincerely – but blamed ultra-nationalists.

A European plan to supervise reform in the Ottoman Armenian provinces
in 1914 never got off the ground. Under the cover of WW I, Turkey
then used genocide to "reform" the Armenian provinces.

After the war, Kemal Ataturk, the well-known "modernizer" and
"reformer," massacred and expelled most remaining Armenians and
attacked the just-born Armenian Republic.

"Modern" Turkey continued mistreating its remaining Christians using
discrimination, labor camps, riots, and confiscation, down to the
present day.

Imagine that each of the foregoing example of "reform" were to take
place in today’s Turkey. The world – including some Armenians – would
stand up and clap. As we can now look back and see that tragedies have
followed each Turkish "reform," it might be wiser to hold the applause.

Nevertheless, will the EU successfully reform Turkey, and might Turkey
then amend its policies toward Armenia?

The EU Looks East

Though the EU has affirmed the Genocide, it has rejected any
requirement that Turkey itself must do so before joining. That shows
bad faith towards Armenia.

Reforming Turkey isn’t the EU’s primary interest anyway. Rather, the
EU – pushed along by Washington and London – wishes to use Turkey
to reach into the massive oil and gas reserves of the Middle East,
Caspian Sea basin and Central Asia, and to surround Russia.

The EU will subsidize and re-invigorate the Turkish economy. Turkey’s
value to the West, as well as its military power and belligerence,
can only grow.

But might Turkey, as an EU member, orient itself to Europe and thus
turn away from adventures to the east that could harm Armenia? Probably
not. As the West wishes to dominate the Caspian, Turkish policy will
necessarily be directed even more assertively to the east, where sits
Armenia. Such an eastern orientation bodes ill as the West has always,
in the final analysis, sided with Turkey against Armenians.

It would be tragic if the prospect of Turkish reform, and the hope now
felt by some Armenians over the amity displayed during Dink’s funeral,
made them forget the hard lessons of history.

Armenia, Azerbaijan Fail To Overcome Divide In Talks; Armenian FM

ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN FAIL TO OVERCOME DIVIDE IN TALKS; ARMENIAN FM

Agence France Presse — English
March 14, 2007 Wednesday

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian said Wednesday talks with
his Azeri counterpart in Switzerland over the disputed enclave of
Nagorno-Karabakh had failed to overcome deep differences.

"Although there is clearer understanding of each other’s positions,
one thing is evident that there are deep differences," Oskanian
said in a statement after he met Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister Elmar
Mamedyarov in Geneva.

However the two ministers did decide to hold a further meeting in
April, which could lead to talks at a presidential level, the Armenian
envoy added.

Nagorno-Karabakh’s break from Azerbaijan in 1991 precipitated a
full-blown war between the former Soviet republic and its neighbour
Armenia, claiming some 25,000 lives before ending with a ceasefire
in 1994.

The region’s status remains unsettled, despite years of diplomatic
talks.

Conference Of Hay Dat Committees Opens In Yerevan

CONFERENCE OF HAY DAT COMMITTEES OPENS IN YEREVAN

Yerkir
12.03.2007 17:09

YEREVAN (YERKIR) – The conference of the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation’s (ARF) Hay Dat committees opened in Yerevan on March 12. It
will discuss key aspects of Armenia’s domestic and foreign policies,
review the ARF Hay Dat strategy and discuss the work to be done by
the committees and offices.

This is the second such conference held in Yerevan. 85 members of
the ARF Hay Dat committees, youth and student organizations from
28 countries, including Argentina, USA, Canada, Belgium, Cyprus,
Uruguay and Great Britain, are attending the conference.

National Assembly deputy speaker and the ARF Bureau member made the
opening remarks. He was followed by Levon Mkrtchian, ARF Armenia
Supreme Body member and the Science and Education minister, and ARF
Armenia Supreme Body representative Armen Rustamian.

Bernard Fassier: Difficult To Guess Outcome Of Meeting In Geneva

BERNARD FASSIER: DIFFICULT TO GUESS OUTCOME OF MEETING IN GENEVA

PanARMENIAN.Net
12.03.2007 20:06 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "One of the goals of my visit to the region is
to prepare the meeting between Armenian and Azeri FMs in Geneva,
which will be held March 14," OSCE Minsk Group French Co-Chair Bernard
Fassier stated to a press conference in Yerevan. He said, the agreement
on holding a meeting was reached during the meeting of OSCE Co-Chairs
in Paris this February. "I am dealing with preparations alone because
my schedule of works is not so intense considered with other Co-Chairs,
but I am speaking on behalf of them. All my meetings in Baku and
Yerevan, including the meeting with the head of Nagorno Karabakh Arkadi
Ghukassian were productive and constructive," Fassier said. In his
words, to guess the outcome of Geneva meeting is difficult, but he
hopes that "the sides will be able to come to any agreement".

"The matter is not about some new offers or magic ways of
settlement. The matter is about the document on the table," the French
mediator stressed. He noted, if talks are successful, that is to say,
an agreement is reached on the main principles of settlement, as well
as if several constructive meetings are held, it will be possible
to speak about preparing a meeting between the presidents of both
countries. "But in any case during electoral campaign in Armenia no
steps will be made. We can speak about something concrete after May
12," Bernard Fassier told.