ANKARA: Gul: We Had Been In A Passive Position,Now We Are In An Acti

Gul: We Had Been In A Passive Position, Now We Are In An Active Position

Turkish Press
May 7 2005

BISHKEK (AA) – Turkish Foreign Minister & Deputy Prime Minister
Abdullah Gul said on Thursday that Turkey was late to take initiatives
against the allegations of the so-called Armenian genocide, and
stressed that organized efforts were needed to make the reality known
by everybody.

Replying to the questions of reporters, Gul said Turkey was late to
take initiatives against the allegations in question. Gul said that
the Armenian issue was even used as a means in domestic policy in
some countries to wear out the government.

Gul said his government would deploy efforts to prevent any process
against Turkey and to make the parliaments step back from making
wrong decisions.

Stating the decision made in Belgium as an example, Gul said, “can you
imagine? They can make such accusations by taking into consideration
just misinformation and lies. We should inform them correctly. We
should struggle against them.”

Gul said that academicians and NGOs also had a crucial role in
telling the truths to the world regarding Armenian claims, noting
that “only if we can start a civilized fight against these claims,
we can correct the mistakes.”

Upon a question, Gul said that all the archives in Turkey were opened
and the views of Turkey were supported in many platforms including
the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

Gul said “Turkey which had assumed a passive policy till today is
now in an active position.”

Gul said that Turkey evaluated the letter of Armenian President Robert
Kocharian in a comprehensive way and regarded it optimistically.

ANKARA: ‘All Turkish and Muslim Monuments Destroyed in Yerevan’

‘All Turkish and Muslim Monuments Destroyed in Yerevan’

Journal of Turkish weekly, Turkey
May 6 2005

Dr. Erol Kurkcuoglu from Erzurum Ataturk University said that the
Armenians had destroyed the Turkish and Muslim heritage in Armenia.
“Once Yerevan was a Turkish city” Kurkcuoglu added.

Kurkcuoglu said “the name of the city was Revan until the 19th
century. Gok, Kopru Kulagi, Tepebasi Mescits and Serdar Castle were
destroyed by the Armenians. They destroyed all Turkish and Muslim
traces in Armenia. 83 percent of Yerevan was Turkish during the 19th
century, however the share decreased to 4.3 after the First World War”.

There is almost no Muslim or Turkish population in Armenia right now.
More than 1 million Turkish people became refugee after the Karabakh
Occupation. 20 percent of Azerbaijani territories have been under
Armenian population for a decade.

ANKARA: Erdogan might meet with Kocharyan: FM

Erdogan might meet with Kocharyan: FM

NTV MSNBC, Turkey
May 5 2005

There is a possibility that Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan might hold a meeting with Armenian head of state Robert
Kocharyan in Warsaw, Turkey’s Foreign Minister said.

May 5- Referring to German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder
describing the Greek Orthodox Patriarch as ecumenical, Gul said that
Ankara’s clearly does not recognise this status.

While saying that no direct plans had been made to hold informal
discussions between the two, there was a chance such talks could take
place, Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul said
“There is nothing planned but it could happen,” Gul said.
Although Turkey does not have diplomatic relations with
Armenia, Ankara recognises the country and holds meeting at various
levels, he said.
Ankara was taking measures to prevent the making of statements
saying there was no Armenian genocide a criminal offence in some
countries, Gul said, adding that he had held talks with his Belgian
counterpart stressing the mistakes made by his country over the issue
of the alleged Armenian genocide.
Gul also told Belgium that preventing the expression of
thought of an individual was in contradiction to the fundamental
principles of Europe.

Waging Peace on Islam

Christianity Today
May 5 2005

Waging Peace on Islam

A missionary veteran of Asia proposes one way to defuse Muslim anger
about the Crusades.

Interview by Stan Guthrie | posted 05/05/2005 09:00 a.m.

Months before the movie Kingdom of Heaven was to be released, critics
lined up to lament how this big-budget film about the Crusades would
set back Muslim-Christian relations, leading to a Muslim or Christian
backlash, depending on whom you read. But it’s not as if this movie
is raising an issue long since dead. The question is not if the
Crusades are a live memory for Muslims, but why? And how do
Christians who minister to Muslims deal with this sad historical
fact?

Warren Larson is director of the Zwemer Center for Muslim Studies at
Columbia International University, Columbia, South Carolina. An
associate professor of Islam with expertise in Muslim fundamentalism,
the Canadian-born Larson was a church-planting missionary in the
Punjab, Pakistan’s largest province, from 1969 to 1991. (The small
church he and his wife worked in remains active in the 99.9 percent
Muslim city of Dera Ghazi Khan.)

Today Larson travels widely in the Muslim world. Stan Guthrie, ct’s
senior associate news editor and author of Missions in the Third
Millennium, interviewed him.

The First Crusade began nearly a millennium ago, and yet we often
hear that Muslims think about those terrible events as if they
happened yesterday. Why?

It’s a perception of ongoing Western imperialism. There’s a long
history of unsuccessful encounters. The Crusades are in there, but
also the fact that the Muslims were booted out of Spain in 1492.
That’s also very bitter for them. And then there was colonialism.
Nine-tenths of the Muslim world was under colonialism. They connect
all this~Wincluding Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and other things going on
in the Middle East.

Why do so many Muslims continue to see the West as a Christian empire
when, in fact, it’s become highly secularized and pluralistic in
recent decades?

One reason is that there are a lot of Christians here in the West.
Muslims are convinced that evangelical Christians won the vote for
George W. Bush and that America is quite Christian. Those
perceptions, of course, are only partly true. One would hope
[Muslims] would understand that the West is post-Christian, but in
many ways, it hasn’t quite hit them yet.

When we were living in Pakistan, they felt the things that went on in
America~Wthe immorality, the immodesty, the drinking~Wwere sanctioned
by Christianity.

Sometimes evangelicals in North America, particularly in the United
States, say things that are not wise. They’re not helping
Muslim-Christian relations. In some cases, they have demonized Islam
and denigrated the prophet [Muhammad]. They’ve done it publicly. This
news travels far and wide, and Muslims print it in their newspapers.
That keeps some of the feeling alive.

Can’t we just explain to Muslims the concept of free speech and the
open exchange of ideas?

Yes, but saying that Muhammad was a demonized pedophile doesn’t seem
accurate or fair. Nor is it wise. We have a free press, but we have
to use it with discretion.

How do negative Muslim perceptions affect Christian missionaries and
local Christians at street level?

In some areas of Pakistan, Islam has been radicalized, and
anti-Americanism is higher today than when I was there. Partly as a
result, the 500 missionaries who were there have now been reduced to
about 100.

Christians have suffered. There have been quite a few attacks in
places such as Pakistan. Churches have been burned. Schools have been
attacked. Muslim converts [to Christianity], in particular, have
suffered and feel quite vulnerable. When I was in Ethiopia recently,
the fellow who did my translating was a Somali. He was part of a
group of believers, formerly Muslims, who came out of Somalia in 1994
when the U.S. military failed in Mogadishu. Islamists hunted down and
killed 14 members of his group. He got out of there by the skin of
his teeth.

How should local Christians and missionaries respond to these
historically negative associations with the Crusades in the minds of
Muslims?

I think an apology is in order. But having said that, I think we have
to hold Muslims accountable, too. They might forget or not be aware
that, starting in 1915, Turks killed more than a million and a half
Armenian Christians. There have been unsuccessful encounters between
Muslims and Christians for nearly the last 1,500 years, but [this
history is] not all the fault of the West and Christians. Muslims
have also done wrong.

Wouldn’t you say that Christians have apologized because they
recognized that they did not live up to the ideals of their faith,
such as turning the other cheek? A lot of Muslims might think,
however, that the Islamic doctrine of jihad justifies certain violent
actions. Thus, they may not be so willing to apologize.

That’s true. Islam doesn’t teach you to forgive your enemies. But,
for the sake of truth, we need to confront them. We can do it
lovingly, but we need to do it.

When you forgive Muslims, they recognize the difference. They say,
“We don’t forgive anybody, but now we see that you’re different.” On
November 20, 1979, when the holy Kaaba in Mecca was taken over by
unnamed insurgents, we were living in Dera Ghazi Khan. The rumor went
out, thanks to Ayatollah Khomeini, that it was the work of Americans
and Jews. When the false rumor reached our city, a mob formed and
attacked us at our house and burned our jeeps, burned our literature,
smashed furniture, and could have killed us, but for the grace of
God.

During this time, the American embassy was burned to the ground in
Islamabad. A few days later, the news came out that [the perpetrators
at the Kaaba were] not Americans and Jews, but Saudis. The police and
the military in our city rescued us and grabbed a few of the rioters
and put them in prison.

We went to them and said, “We forgive you. We’re not going to lodge a
case against you.” Then, neighbors, some of the people who knew me
well, embraced me.

They said, “Mr. Larson, we now know the difference between you and
us. We do not forgive our enemies. When there’s trouble between us,
Sunnis and Shiites, we fight and burn one another’s shops. But you
have forgiven us.”

That was a great help, because it furthered our cause.

I said, “We’re just doing what Jesus taught us to do.”

Do you see that as a model for future interactions?

I sure do. I think it’s very much waging peace on Islam rather than
taking a militant stance as Christians. It’s a kind of spirit. It’s
doing mission in the light of the Cross, or in the shadow of the
Cross. It’s a spirit of reconciliation, and it certainly does help.
And Muslims respond. They do.

Seeing Christ on the Cross forgive his enemies in The Passion of the
Christ was really quite powerful for Muslims. They may have gone to
see the movie with wrong motives, but the fact that he forgave his
enemies from the Cross seemed to touch them. Many, many Muslims went
to see this movie. It was very powerful.

Do you expect Kingdom of Heaven to have an effect on Christian-Muslim
relations?

I don’t know. I hope it doesn’t hinder them, because there’s enough
already out there to worsen conditions.

Antelias: The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia participates in thec

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V. Rev. Fr. Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

Armenian version:

THE CATHOLICOSATE OF CILICIA PARTICIPATES IN THE CONFERENCE DEDICATED TO ISLAM

The American Catholic University of Washington and the Cultural
and Islamic Affairs Center of Iran organized a conference entitled
“Islam and political order” in Washington on April 25-26.

Archbishop Sebouh Sarkisian, Primate of the Diocese of Tehran,
participated in the conference on behalf of the Catholicosate of
Cilicia.

Archbishop Sarkisian stressed the importance of dialogue during his
lecture and spoke about the contribution of the Catholicosate of
Cilcia in this field. He also touched upon the issue of the Armenian
Genocide and called the participants to support the Armenian people
in the name of justice.

Archbishop Sarkisian held meetings with senior American officials and
underlined the importance of the recognition of the Armenian Genocide
by the US Government.

##

The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates
of the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the
Ecumenical activities of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer
to the web page of the Catholicosate, The
Cilician Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is
located in Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.cathcil.org/
http://www.cathcil.org/v04/doc/Armenian.htm
http://www.cathcil.org/

Los esfuerzos de Turquia

Los esfuerzos de Turquia

El Pais, España
Miércoles 4 Mayo 2005

Viene de la pagina anterior dias de merecido descanso, disfrutar de
unos dias de puente. Hasta el proximo.- Sebastian Fernandez
Izquierdo. Petrer, Alicante.

He leido con asombro y tristeza el articulo de Carmen Lopez Alonso,
publicado en su prestigioso diario EL PAIS de 20 de abril de 2005, en
el que acepta el “genocidio armenio” como un hecho historico de
veracidad absoluta. Estos acontecimientos, altamente complejos y
multidimensionales, necesitan sin duda ser desentranados con toda
claridad. Solamente de esta forma se puede iluminar el futuro.
Presentar el “genocidio” como un dato firme sin hacer una
investigacion exhaustiva y objetiva no solamente genera una
tergiversacion de los hechos historicos, sino que tambien dificulta
que las naciones turca y armenia, que han convivido estrechamente
durante toda su historia, puedan crear un futuro comun.

Turquia esta en paz con su historia y, como pais de derecho,
respetuoso con los derechos humanos, esta poniendo todo su empeno
para que resplandezca toda la verdad. Animado por este afan, el
Parlamento de la Republica de Turquia emitio una declaracion, con
fecha 13 de abril de 2005, que busca la reconciliacion entre las
naciones turca y armenia que han estado conviviendo durante siglos en
paz y armonia en las mismas tierras, y liberarlos de los profundos
prejuicios que los atenazan como resultado de los anos de guerra,
proponiendo la creacion de una comision conjunta compuesta por
historiadores de Turquia y Armenia. Asimismo, el primer ministro de
la Republica de Turquia ha remitido una carta al presidente de
Armenia formalizando esta propuesta de crear una comision conjunta
para el estudio de estos acontecimientos tan dolorosos para todos y
expresando la disposicion de Turquia a presentar a dicha comision
todos los documentos e informacion que obran en su poder. Esta es una
demostracion de nuestra voluntad sincera de hacer frente al problema
armenio.

La autora del articulo me ha desilusionado como persona que desea que
las verdades se sepan con toda claridad al repetir en su articulo,
una vez mas, una alegacion cada vez mas politizada como si fuera un
hecho historico, sin referirse para nada a estos esfuerzos sinceros
de Turquia.- Volkan Vural. Embajador de Turquia.

–Boundary_(ID_z3wv2czkV2HEABEmry74Kw)–

Genocide denial on the web

GENOCIDE DENIAL ON THE WEB

AZG Armenian Daily #080, 04/05/2005

Armenian Genocide

More than a month ago was hacked by the Turkish
deniers of the Armenian Genocide; the language was garbled into
Turkish and the section of the Armenian Genocide was renamed “So-called
Armenian Genocide.”

Recently the Web site has been liberated from the hackers and is
functioning now. Please participate in the discussion by registering
at

www.genocide.com
www.genocide.com.

Nothing extraordinary happens in Armenia regarding Constitutional…

NOTHING EXTRAORDINARY HAPPENS IN ARMENIA REGARDING CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS

Pan Armenian News
03.05.2005 07:38

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The referendum on constitutional changes in Armenia
will be held in August 2005 the earliest. In the words of Armenian
Parliament Vice-Speaker, head of the Armenian delegation to the PACE
Tigran Torosian, it is technically impossible to hold the referendum
before that time. The head of the Armenian delegation to the PACE also
commented on some details of the PACE spring session, specifically,
referring to the PACE Bureau decision not to include the situation
on the constitutional reform in Armenia as a pressing issue in the
session agenda. In Tigran Torosian’s words, the PACE presidency has
turned down the proposal, as is well-informed on the processes in
the republic. “Nothing extraordinary happens in Armenia regarding
constitutional reforms, all our moves are known and coordinated

Armenien stabilisieren statt isolieren

Süddeutsche Zeitung
3. Mai 2005

Armenien stabilisieren statt isolieren;

Von Jörg Himmelreich;
Außenansicht

Armenier in aller Welt gedachten jüngst des Völkermordes an ihren
Landsleuten vor 90 Jahren. Die Bundesregierung sollte dieses Gedenken
zum Anlass nehmen, ihre Außenpolitik und die der Europäischen Union
gegenüber Armenien zu überprüfen. Die Stabilisierung Armeniens und
seiner südkaukasischen Nachbarn Georgien und Aserbaidschan ist für
die EU, die USA und Russland im Hinblick auf die Brückenfunktion des
Südkaukasus in den Mittleren Osten und nach Zentralasien von
strategischer, geopolitischer Bedeutung. In diesem europäischen
Hinterhof droht sich ein nationalistisches und islamistisches
Konfliktpotenzial zusammenzubrauen, dessen Explosivkraft sträflichst
unterschätzt wird.

Im Sommer 2005 wird die neue Ölpipeline von Baku über Tiflis zu dem
türkischen Mittelmeerterminal Ceyhan fertiggestellt. Öl und, vom
nächstem Jahr an, Gas aus den Energiereservoirs Aserbaidschans im
Kaspischen Meer werden so auf die europäischen Energiemärkte
geliefert werden. Diese so genannte BTC-Pipeline dient auch als ein
Bindeglied zu einer möglichen Energietransportverbindung durch das
Kaspische Meer zu den Gasvorkommen Zentralasiens, insbesondere
Turkmenistans. Bisher haben Öl und Gas aus dieser Region vornehmlich
über Russland den europäischen Markt mit bis zu 300-prozentigem
Preisaufschlag durch den russischen, staatlichen Zwischenlieferanten
erreicht. Die hohe Abhängigkeit Europas von Gasimporten aus Russland
würde durch einen solchen, das russische Territorium umgehenden
Energietransport beträchtlich verringert werden.

Die staatliche Fragilität der südkaukasischen Staaten stellt einen
Nährboden für die organisierte Kriminalität, für Menschen-, Waffen-
und Drogenhandel sowie ein Rückzugs- und Aufbaugebiet islamistischer
Terrorgruppen dar. Sie gefährdet die Stabilität und den Frieden
Europas unmittelbar und wirkt sich destabilisierend auf den
russischen Nordkaukasus und auf den Norden der Türkei aus. Die
Instabilität Armeniens trägt maßgeblich zu diesem
Gefährdungspotenzial für Europa bei.

Das große außenpolitische Problem Armeniens ist die Lösung des
Nagorny-Karabach-Konflikts, einer von armenischen Streitkräften seit
dem Krieg mit Aserbaidschan 1994 besetzten Provinz auf dem
Territorium Aserbaidschans. Die so genannte Minsk-Gruppe der

OSZE unter gemeinsamer Leitung Frankreichs, Russlands und der USA
bemüht sich seit 1993 vergebens um eine greifbare Lösung, sofern die
Einhaltung des Waffenstillstands nicht schon als solche ausreichen
soll. Die Außenminister und Präsidenten Armeniens und Aserbaidschans
vermitteln nicht den Eindruck, an Kompromissen tatsächlich
interessiert zu sein. Auch scheinen sie innenpolitisch nicht in der
Lage zu sein, diese durchzusetzen. Jede Seite geht fälschlicherweise
davon aus, die Zeit spiele zu ihren Gunsten; gleichzeitig profitiert
jede Seite wirtschaftlich vom Status quo.

Die zweite, nicht weniger komplexe außenpolitische Frage ist die des
Umgangs von Armenien, der Türkei und der internationalen Gemeinschaft
mit den Ereignissen, deren die Armenier in aller Welt am 24. April
gedachten. Das Deutsche Reich hat 1915 fest zu seinem türkischen
Bündnispartner im Ersten Weltkrieg gestanden. Bezeichnend ist der
Aktenvermerk des damaligen Reichskanzlers Theobald von
Bethmann-Hollweg: “Unser einziges Ziel ist, die Türkei bis zum Ende
des Krieges an unserer Seite zu halten, ob darüber Armenier zugrunde
gehen oder nicht.” Die türkische Regierung bestreitet bis heute den
Tatbestand des Völkermords nach den Kriterien der Genfer Konvention.
Ihre Grenzen nach Armenien sind geschlossen.

Aus diesem historischen Erbe und aus ihren traditionell guten
Beziehungen zur Türkei kommt der Bundesrepublik heute eine besondere
Verantwortung zu, sich in der EU für eine Vermittlung zwischen
Armenien und der Türkei einzusetzen. Vorrangiges Ziel muss es sein,
die Frage der Anerkennung des Tatbestandes des Völkermordes durch die
Türkei von der der Öffnung der Grenze zu trennen. In der türkischen
Regierung nimmt die Bereitschaft zu einer solchen pragmatischen
Verständigung mit Armenien zu. Gewisse Rücksichtnahmen auf das
historisch eng verbundene muslimische Aserbaidschan (“Eine Nation,
zwei Länder”) scheinen dem noch entgegen zu stehen. Der zügigen
Öffnung der türkisch-armenischen Grenze käme in den Verhandlungen der
EU mit der Türkei über ihren Beitritt und mit Armenien und
Aserbaidschan im Rahmen des Europäischen Nachbarschaftsprogramms
höchste Priorität zu.

Verglichen mit Georgien und Aserbaidschan befindet sich Armenien
politisch im Schatten der westlichen Aufmerksamkeit und droht
wirtschaftlich isoliert zu werden. Zwangsläufig sieht es sich
genötigt, seine ohnehin schon bestehenden engen politischen und
wirtschaftlichen Beziehungen mit Russland, aber auch mit dem Iran
weiter auszubauen.

Innenpolitisch hat Präsident Kotscharjan am 25. Mai 2003 seine
Präsidentschaft durch Wahlen verlängert, die keineswegs
internationalen Standards für demokratische Wahlen entsprachen. Aus
Protest boykottieren die Oppositionsparteien seitdem das Parlament.
Demonstrationen werden mit Gewalt unterdrückt. Neue Demonstrationen
der Oppositionsparteien werden vorbereitet. Die Entwicklungen in
Georgien, in der Ukraine und in Kirgisien strahlen aus, während
Präsident Kotscharjan eine Verfassungsänderung zu seiner weiteren
Wiederwahl nach zentralasiatischem Vorbild vorbereitet.

Die Lösung des Nagorny-Karabach-Konflikts ist die entscheidende
Voraussetzung für eine Stabilisierung Armeniens und der gesamten
südkaukasischen Region. Daher ist ein Neuanstoß auf höchster
Regierungsebene der USA und Russlands dringend notwendig, diesen
Verhandlungen der beiden Konfliktparteien nachhaltig zu einem
Durchbruch zu verhelfen. Eine solche Initiative von Russland und den
USA anzuregen, ist die Bundesregierung mit ihren guten Beziehungen zu
beiden prädestiniert. Beide Konfliktparteien müssen angehalten
werden, die Klärung des langfristigen Status von Nagorny-Karabach auf
einen späteren Zeitpunkt zu vertagen, die außerhalb dieser Provinz
von armenischen Truppen besetzten Gebieten zu räumen, eine
Landverbindung Armeniens mit Nagorny-Karabach zu gestatten und
diplomatische Beziehungen wieder aufzunehmen. Das wäre seitens der
Bundesregierung eine konstruktive Russlandpolitik und zugleich ein
Baustein im Wiederaufbau der transatlantischen Beziehungen.

Die Stabilisierung Armeniens liegt im ureigensten Interesse der EU,
USA und Russlands. Dieses Anliegen sollte in den Nebengesprächen am
9. Mai in Moskau aufgegriffen werden, wenn dort des Endes des Zweiten
Weltkriegs und des Nationalsozialismus gedacht wird. Dies wäre dann
ein hervorragendes Beispiel dafür, sich nicht nur einer gemeinsamen
Verantwortung in der Vergangenheit bewusst zu sein, sondern diese
auch in die Zukunft fortzutragen.

GRAFIK: Jörg Himmelreich ist derzeit TransatlanticFellow des German
Marshall Fund in Washington. Foto: privat

–Boundary_(ID_YzPSoEPqcLthZppKaEqNAA)–

Gamsakhurdia supporters stage protest at US embassy in Georgia

Gamsakhurdia supporters stage protest at US embassy in Georgia
By Eka Mekhuzla

ITAR-TASS News Agency
May 3, 2005 Tuesday 2:04 PM Eastern Time

TBILISI, May 3 — The widow of ex-Georgian president Zviad
Gamsakhurdia, Manana Archvadze-Gamsakhurdia, 55, and about one hundred
of her supporters held a rally outside the United States embassy
in Tbilisi on Tuesday, proclaiming: “Mr Bush, you don’t know what
happens in Georgia.”

Gamsakhurdia’s supporters stressed that George Bush who arrives on
a visit in Tbilisi “must learn the truth” about what happens and
happened in Georgia, specifically, that “the lawful president was
overthrown in the country in the early 1992.”

In the protesters’ opinion, George Bush, during his visit in Georgia
on May 9-10, should meet not only the present leaders of the republic
but also members of the opposition, among them Gamsakhurdia’s widow.

Gamsakhurdia left Georgia on January 6, 1992 after a fortnight of
armed clashes between his opponents and supporters. He was for ten
days in Armenia and then flew to Chechnya where he was staying till
September 1993 under the patronage of Dzhokhar Dudayev. Gamsakhurdia
returned to Georgia on September 24, 1993 and tried to regain power
in October-November 1993 with the assistance of armed units loyal to
him. Aster suffering a defeat, Gamsakhurdia was hiding in highland
villages in West Georgia and died on December 31, 1993.