Armrosgasprom CEO Points Out Armenia’s Progress In Energy Security

ARMROSGASPROM CEO POINTS OUT ARMENIA’S PROGRESS IN ENERGY SECURITY

ARKA
Jan 20, 2009

YEREVAN, January 20. /ARKA/. Armenia has made essential progress
in its energy security, Karen Karapetyan, Chief Executive Officer,
ArmRosgasprom Company, stated at an international gas conference
in Moscow.

Speaking of uninterrupted gas supply and Armenia’s energy security,
Karapetyan pointed out a number of acute problems, the ArmRosgasprom
press service reports.

"However, I can say that the gas supply has regularly been interrupted
in the country in wintertime over the last five years, which has not
affected the users at all," Karapetyan said.

According to him, the Armenian gas users would not have even felt
the January gas-supply interruptions but for the mass media.

"The real state of affairs is that Armenia has a much higher energy
security level than many of the European states with the imports of
energy resources seeming to be more diversified there than in Armenia,"
Karapetyan said.

He said that the conference asked suggestive questions, and the way
Armenia has chosen to resolve the energy security problems is an
effective one.

"This is another testimony that we are following the right way,
taking timely measures," Karapetyan said.

The Moscow gas conference demonstrated the necessity for revising
both the current mechanisms of power supply and energy security and
the relevant laws.

0A The ArmRosgasprom holds a monopoly of distribution of the Russian
natural gas in Armenia.

The company was founded in 1997. The Gazprom OJSC and the RA Ministry
of Energy hold 45% of the company’s stock each, with 10% held by the
Itera Company. Under two of the three phases of the investment stage,
after Gazprom purchased additional shares of the ArmRosgasprom CJSC,
in 2006 and 2008, its share in ArmRosgasprom’s authorized capital
reached 75.55%.

The RA Government’s share is 20%, and that of Itera 4.44.

In Opinion Of Human Rights Activist Vardan Haroutiunian, Sanctions W

IN OPINION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST VARDAN HAROUTIUNIAN, SANCTIONS WILL BE USED NOT TO COUNTRY BUT TO AUTHORITIES

Noyan Tapan

Jan 19, 2009

YEREVAN, JANUARY 19, NOYAN TAPAN. According to human rights activist
Vardan Haroutiunian, the Chairman of the Committee for Protection
of Political Prisoners and Persecuted People, the Armenian society
expects a right and fair position from the Council of Europe. In his
interview to Noyan Tapan correspondent he expressed confidence that
as a result of the latest visit of PACE Co-rapporteurs on Armenia
John Prescott and George Colombier Council of Europe will give an
adequate estimation to Armenia’s home political situation.

Touching upon RPA Board member Rafik Petrosian’s statement voiced
some days ago that the opposition treats the prospect of country’s
being deprived of the vote with calf’s rejoicing, V. Haroutiunian
said that sanctions will be used not to the country but to the
authorities. According to him, "being deprived of the vote in their own
country, now they will not have the vote in Europe, either." He added
that there are all bases for suspending Armenian delegation’s vote.

V. Haroutiunian confirmed the rumors in media, according to which
people imprisoned on the March 1 case are asked, made and are offered
money for writing appeals of mercy to the President. However, such
a conduct of the authorities, according to V. Haroutiunian, is
like the efforts of a drowning man clinging to foams. He stressed
that the prevailing majority of the imprisoned people refused to
introduce an appeal of mercy. "Even if 15-20 people are released,
all the same Armenia’s prisons are filled with political prisoners,"
the Committee Chairman said.

http://www.nt.am?shownews=1011362

ANKARA: Hundreds Commemorate Slain Turkish-Armenian Journalist

HUNDREDS COMMEMORATE SLAIN TURKISH-ARMENIAN JOURNALIST

Hurriyet
Jan 19 2009
Turkey

Hundreds of people commemorated Monday slain Turkish-Armenian
journalist, Hrant Dink, in Istanbul on the second anniversary of
his murder.

Hundreds of people gathered in front of the weekly multilingual
newspaper Agos in the central Sisli district, where Dink was killed.

Dink, editor in chief of Agos newspaper, was shot dead outside the
offices of the paper in Istanbul in January 2007.

Hundreds of people, including relatives and colleagues, held a
graveside remembrance ceremony on Sunday in Istanbul.

White pigeons were released in a commemoration attended by a group
of around 100 people in the central Anatolian province of Eskisehir
on Saturday.

BAKU: Azerbaijani, Armenian Presidents May Meet In Late January: OSC

AZERBAIJANI, ARMENIAN PRESIDENTS MAY MEET IN LATE JANUARY: OSCE MG RUSSIAN CO-CHAIR

Trend News Agency
Jan 19 2009
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, Jan. 19 /Trend News, E.Tariverdiyeva/ As a result
of their meeting with Azerbaijani President, the OSCE Minsk Group
co-chairs received an initial consent to meet with his Armenian
counterpart beyond the Davos forum.

"The most likely date of the meeting between the Presidents is the
midday of Jan. 28," OSCE MG Russian co-chair Yuri Merzlyakov said to
journalists on Jan. 19.

"When in Yerevan, we expect to receive a relevant consent from the
Armenian side," he said.

According to the Russian diplomat, the basic principles are still
of current importance. "If the meeting takes place, some principles
will be further specified," he said, adding that some wordings may
be changed.

On Jan. 19, the OSCE MG co-chairs met in Baku with Azerbaijani
President Ilham Aliyev and Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov to
discuss the ways to settle the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian armed
forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992, including
the Nagorno-Karabakh region and 7 surrounding districts. Azerbaijan
and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The co-chairs of
the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France, and the U.S. – are currently
holding the peace negotiations.

BAKU: We have nothing to say to Moscow

Ekspress, Azerbaijan
Jan 12 2009

We have nothing to say to Moscow

Experts: The Kremlin can arm its outpost but official Baku has also to
express its position

Reports about Russia continuing to deliver weapons to Armenia have
topped the agenda. As was reported, Media forum news agency has
obtained the list of 69 types of weapons, ammunition, hardware and
equipment handed over to the Armenian Defence Ministry by Russian
Gyumri-based military unit No 102.

The document on the delivery of weapons has been signed by the chief
of military base No 102 for armament, the deputy chief for armament of
the Northern Caucasus Military District, Lt-Gen Vyacheslav
Golovchenko, in 2008. The overall cost of the weapons, according to
estimations of experts, is about 800m dollars.

The spokesman for the Azerbaijani Defence Ministry, Lt-Col Eldar
Sabiroglu, has said that the report needs to be verified in
earnest. The experts assess the arming of Armenia, the occupier of the
Azerbaijani lands, by Russia – a member of the OSCE Minsk Group – as
indicative of our northern neighbour’s policy in the region.

Expert opinions vary

"Russia wants to silence Armenia by conveying a message to allay its
fears that it is lagging behind Azerbaijan – do not take a step
back. The conflict is only being kept frozen in order for Russia to
retain the region under control. Therefore, I think this case [arms
delivery] is in line with the Russian policy. Types of weapons and
amount are not significant," political expert Zardust Alizada told
Ekspress in a comment on the delivery of the Russian weapons to
Armenia.

In the expert’s view, under the current realities, the sale of Russian
weapons to Armenia is not of great significance for Azerbaijan.
Because the Azerbaijani government has no plans to go to war: "The
people are also indifferent to whether or not Karabakh is under
occupation. If only to make a living." In his opinion, Russia truly
wants stability in the Caucasus; however, this stability is
"peculiar". The stability Russia wants is that "Armenia has occupied
Azerbaijani lands. Azerbaijan is enduring this occupation stably and
does not want to undermine it. Through this conflict, Moscow keeps
both Azerbaijan and Armenia under control."

Former Azerbaijani ambassador to Russia Hikmat Hacizada says that
under the current conditions Azerbaijan has to seek partners and move
towards NATO. However, the North Atlantic alliance still does not let
the South Caucasus closer to itself. As for whether or not a military
agreement will be signed with Turkey, the political expert thinks that
this will not happen: "Turkey alone is not able to help us. This can
be done jointly with the West."

Political expert Vafa Quluzada views arming of Armenia by Russia as an
ordinary case: "It is obvious that Armenia is the outpost of
Russia. All this is obvious and outright. Russia is Armenia’s military
ally and can sell as many weapons as it wants. Azerbaijan also
purchases weapons from Russia, what can we say to Moscow?! We cannot
say anything."

In a comment on the issue to Media forum news agency, the political
expert said that our official circles have to come up with an official
opinion.

Political expert Ilham Ismayil has said that the list of weapons
delivered to Armenia shows that they are not new: "Obviously, Russia
is replacing weapons in military base No 102 with new ones and beefs
up both its positions and Armenia’s by handing old ones to its
ally. It strengthens itself in the anticipation of the possibility of
NATO stationing bases in Georgia in future and supports Armenia as its
outpost." (Media Forum)

Defence Ministry considering report

At the same time, the expert says that although the weapons are not
new, it is possible that they are in good conditions and fit for war
against Azerbaijan and the matter has to be viewed in the context of
interstate relations: "We are pondering over the issue, Defence
Ministry spokesperson Eldar Sabiroglu said in a comment."

These are indefinite thoughts, it is impossible to go far with this. I
consider that this issue should be paid a special attention in
interstate relations. Azerbaijan has to investigate the matter at the
level of the president, deliver its response to Russia and take
necessary measures. The issue should be dealt with separately in the
context of Russia taking the initiative in the Nagornyy Karabakh
conflict. Taking the initiative in the mediation is not at all a
manifestation of Russia’s affection for Azerbaijan but proceeds from
its interests in the South Caucasus. At first glance, it seems that
Russia is a close friend of Azerbaijan. However, even under the USSR,
Russia always preferred Armenia to Azerbaijan. Although the regime has
changed in Russia, its interests have not.

Conflict studies expert Elxan Mehdiyev believes that the demand to
purchase weapons from Russia came from Armenia: "Moscow has always
tried to keep the balance tilted in favour of Armenia. Azerbaijani
officials have always declared that our military budget is equal to
the state budget of Armenia and the process of building the army is
speeding up by the day. Given the situation, Russia helps its
ally. For example, Azerbaijan procures weapons from Russia at world
prices but Armenia does so at domestic prices. Sometimes, weapons are
handed over to Armenia free."

In a comment for Media forum news agency, the chairman of the board of
the Musavat Party, Sulhaddin Akbar, recalled that Russia and Armenia
are military allies under the agreement signed in 1997. "Second, in
the South Caucasus, Russia only has a military base in Armenia. Both
Russia and Armenia are members of the Collective Security Treaty
Organization. Moreover, both states are members of the joint air
defence system. The sides have signed contracts on purchase of
military hardware, as well as agreements in the military and economic
spheres."

Akbar said that from this point of view, the fact of delivering
weapons to Armenia should not be surprising. On the contrary, we
should be surprised at the fact that knowing this, official Baku
inclines towards closer relations with Russia instead of changing the
balance in its favour in the region, the existing status between the
two warring states as well as tipping the balance in own favour.

"After Russia’s so-called success in Georgia, it wants to further
strengthen its positions in the South Caucasus. By beefing up
Armenia’s capacity militarily and strategically, Russia aims to
strengthen its positions in the region. Azerbaijan has to think
seriously that Russia, a military ally of the invading Armenia, cannot
be an impartial and fair mediator. At the same time Russia, which arms
Azerbaijan’s enemy and is behind it, cannot be Azerbaijan’s friend."

[translated from Azeri]

Sargsyan may turn out to be only head of state at Moscow gas summit

President of Armenia may turn out to be the only head of state to take
part in the gas summit in Moscow.

2009-01-17 12:31:00

ArmInfo. President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan may turn out to be the
only head of state to take part in the gas summit in Moscow.

Russian mass media report that most probably the summit will turn into
a gas conference as mostly energy ministers will take part in it.
President of Russia Dmitry Medvedev has invited the heads of all
states receiving gas from Russia or ensuring its transit to other
countries. However, none of the European leaders has yet confirmed his
visit to Moscow. The President of France has refused to come. The
President of Moldova will send his Prime Minister. Serbia will send
energy ministry as most of the other participant states will most
probably do.

The European Union will send the Minister of Industry of the Czech
Republic and the European Commissioner for Energy.

As regards Ukraine’s participation, President Yuschenko will not come
to Moscow. Interfax quotes him as saying that he will not take part in
the summit because Russia, as a conflicting party, has no right to
host such a meeting. Today, prime ministers of Russia and Ukraine
Vladimir Putin and Yulia Timoshenko will meet for the first time since
the start of the gas conflict.

ANKARA: Key Ergenekon Suspect Says Military Hired Him

KEY ERGENEKON SUSPECT SAYS MILITARY HIRED HIM

Hurriyet
Jan 13 2009
Turkey

ISTANBUL – A former police chief and suspect in the trial of the
alleged Ergenekon gang told an Istanbul court Sunday that the military
had called on him to form a 300-strong anti-terror team and collect
information on Armenians in Turkey.

İbrahim Å~^ahin, who had previously been convicted of forming and
heading a criminal gang in 2000, used to be the acting head of the
anti-terror squad in the 1990s and was convicted when his illicit
relations with the mafia came to light during the Susurluk scandal. Of
the 33 people detained last Wednesday, Å~^ahin was one of 17 to be
charged by the court over the weekend.

Among those charged along with Å~^ahin, were socialist writer Yalcın
Kucuk, two colonels, one retired colonel and two lieutenants, as
well as former Higher Education Board, or YOK, president Kemal Guruz,
retired generals Kemal Yavuz and Tuncer Kılınc and the son of former
Istanbul Mayor Bedrettin Dalan.

The charges involve membership in a criminal gang accused of
plotting to overthrow the government. The media has called the
gang Ergenekon, which comes from a legend of the same name. As the
legend goes, pre-Islamic Turks were able to recuperate from a heavy
defeat to overcome their enemies under the guidance and cunning of
a gray wolf. Most of those arrested or charged are known for their
nationalistic sympathies.

The Ergenekon case started after the discovery of 27 hand grenades
in June 2007 in a shanty house in Istanbul’s Umraniye district that
belonged to a retired noncommissioned officer. The grenades were
found to be the same as those used in the attacks on Cumhuriyet
daily’s Istanbul offices in 2006.

The findings led to scores of detentions, putting more than 100
journalists, writers, gang leaders and politicians under arrest. The
alleged gang is accused of trying to instigate the military to topple
the government in 2009 by initially spreading chaos and mayhem.

The earlier bombings of daily Cumhuriyet, the murder of journalist
Hrant Dink, the murder of a top judge of the Council of State and
the alleged plans for the assassination of high-profile figures in
Turkish politics are sometimes associated with the case.

The list of detainees includes retired generals Å~^ener Eruygur and
HurÅ~_id Tolon and retired Maj. Gen. Veli Kucuk. Many detainees
are retired officials who gathered in associations linked to the
ultra-nationalist Kuvayi Milliye (National Forces) Ä~^ a reference
to irregular forces that led the Turkish war for independence back
in the early 1920s.

Å~^ahin says it is his official duty Å~^ahin, in his testimony to
the prosecutors and the court over the weekend, said he was invited
to a meeting with the Chief of General Staff three months ago by
Lieut. Gen. Bekir Kalyoncu, the current commander of the seventh corps
based in Diyarbakır in the southeast. There he was told to form a
300-strong anti-terror team and would be appointed undersecretary
of a new intelligence department. "I prepared a list of 300 former
anti-terror officers and that is the list found in my home," Å~^ahin
told the court.

He was told to conduct an investigation on Armenians in the central
Anatolian Sivas and Kayseri provinces.

When asked about his relationship with another suspect, Fatma Cengiz,
he said Cengiz had given him intelligence about Armenians working
for the pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party, or DTP.

He also denied ownership of the map found in his home that led police
to a large buried weapons cache. "If it is checked, you will realize
the writing on it is not mine," he said. If it were up to him, he
would not have hidden the weapons in GölbaÅ~_ı, where it was found,
but in less conspicuous Elmadag nearby.

Å~^ahin was seen as one of the rising princes of Mehmet Agar, a former
police chief and interior minister, and was appointed as the acting
head of the police anti-terrorism squad in 1993.

He established the police department’s Special Forces School, graduates
of which formed the basis of later anti-terror squads.

After the Susurluk accident in November 1996, when a right-wing
mafia leader, a police chief and a former beauty queen died and a
parliamentarian was severely injured, his descent began. The Susurluk
scandal showed illicit links between the mafia, police and politicians,
with Å~^ahin’s anti-terrorism squad implicated.

Newspapers later printed photos of Å~^ahin together with the fugitive
right-wing militant and mafia boss Abdullah Catlı, who died in
the accident.

He was suspended and then investigated for protecting anti-terror
squad members implicated in the murder of Omer Lutfu Topal, who owned
gambling establishments, and the kidnapping of National Intelligence
Agency, or MİT, officer Tarık Umit.

When a court ordered his arrest, he fled before surrendering and then
serving six months in jail. He was released in September 1997.

He was again charged in March 1999 in connection with weapons given
to the police department that had gone missing.

In 2000, he was severely injured in a traffic accident and he was still
in hospital when he was sentenced to a year in jail for dereliction
of duty.

He was also found guilty in the so-called Susurluk case, found guilty
of forming and leading a criminal gang together with former MİT
member Korkut Eken, each being sentenced to six years in jail.

He was pardoned in August 2002 due to bad health. There were also
photos of him showing his close relationship with retired Maj. Muzaffer
Tekin, who is also currently being tried in connection to the so-called
Ergenekon gang.

Eken, a former MİT member and retired lieutenant colonel, told
daily Hurriyet over the weekend that he could not understand how an
experienced person could leave the map of a weapons cache at home to
be found.

Eken, who worked as a teacher at the Special Forces School in the
1990s, also said the weapons found by police were not linked to the
missing weapons in the Susurluk case. "Those were sent overseas for
an operation. There were 10 guns. However, with the advent of the
Susurluk case, we couldn’t bring the weapons back."

He said he still could not understand why Å~^ahin was convicted and
sentenced to six years in the Susurluk case. He served 2.5 years in
jail before being released.

PM defends probe

Last October, 86 people went on trial, accused of belonging to a
terrorist organization and of plotting to topple the ruling Justice
and Development Party, or AKP, government. The trial will expand to
include suspects retired generals Eruygur, and retired Major Gen. Kucuk
and the others.

The probe initially received support for countering the so-called
"deep state," a term used to describe security forces acting outside
the law, often in collusion with illegal factions, to protect what
they see as Turkey’s best interests.

But the probe’s credibility has been increasingly questioned after
it began targeting journalists, academics, intellectuals and retired
generals who are all known to be vocal government critics. Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan Sunday called on the Republican
People’s Party, or CHP, which has been critical of the probe, to let
investigators do their work. "There are in this country magistrates
and prosecutors who have a free conscience," he said. "Nobody should
think of themselves above justice," he told a party meet.

Cicek denies

Deputy Prime Minister Cemil Cicek said yesterday he had no knowledge of
İbrahin Å~^ahin being offered to head the new anti-terror department.

In response to questions during a remembrance ceremony held
in Parliament for former Labor Minister Necati Celik who died
Sunday, Cicek said: "That’s his testimony. We can’t know if it
is true." Å~^ahin told a court that senior military officers had
approached him three months ago.

They asked him to form an anti-terrorism squad and told him that
he would head it, Å~^ahin said. Cicek, spaeking after a Cabinet
meeting two weeks ago, said the government would be forming a new
anti-terrorism department. The Office of the Chief of General Staff
released a statement yesterday, dismissing Å~^ahin’s claim that the
military had offered him the head of the new anti-terror department.

–Boundary_(ID_zpqEIG91MyGWfCfZbmVdtA )–

Hrant Bagratyan: The Crisis Phenomena In Armenia And CIS Not Linked

HRANT BAGRATYAN: THE CRISIS PHENOMENA IN ARMENIA AND CIS NOT LINKED TO THE WORLD CRISIS
Lusine Vasilyan

"Radiolur"
14.01.2009 14:38

The crisis phenomena in Armenia and the Commonwealth of independent
States are not connected with the world financial crisis. The world
financial crisis simply stimulated the trends that speak about
the structural deviations of economy in Armenia and CIS countries,
economist Hrant Bagratyan told a press conference today.

Bagratyan added that the second phase of the world economic crisis is
expected within the coming months. According to him, Armenia will not
be able to avoid deflation of the national currency and the growth
of unemployment rate.

Zharangutiun Has Little Expectations From Armenian And Azeri Preside

ZHARANGUTIUN HAS LITTLE EXPECTATIONS FROM ARMENIAN AND AZERI PRESIDENTS’ JANUARY 29 MEETING

Noyan Tapan

Jan 13, 2009

YEREVAN, JANUARY 13, NOYAN TAPAN. The Zharangutiun (Heritage)
party has little expectations from the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs’
visit to the region and the January 29 meeting of Azeri and Armenian
Presidents. RA NA Zharangutiun faction member Vardan Khachatrian
stated this at the January 13 press conference, commenting upon the
current stage of Nagorno Karabakh settlement.

"We are still very far from the final settlement agreement. Moreover,
we consider that there is too little room for a compromise, as one
can see from Azeri authorities’ statements that they wish to see all
of us slaughtered.

In consideration of Azerbaijan’s this position, there cannot be verges
of consent today," he said.

As to Azerbaijan’s position voiced repeatedly, to solve the Nagorno
Karabakh problem by war, V. Khachatrian said that there are countries
where general well-being does not affect army’s fighting ability.

http://www.nt.am?shownews=1011231

Tel Aviv: Where have our friends gone?

Ha’aretz, Israel
Jan 11 2009

Where have our friends gone?

By Zvi Ba’rel

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan asked to speak with his
Israeli counterpart Ehud Olmert just before the start of Israel’s
offensive in Gaza. Olmert avoided Erdogan because he did not want to
tell the Turkish premier about the coming attack. He did not want to
be in Menachem Begin’s situation when Begin spoke to Egyptian
president Anwar Sadat one time in 1981 and did not tell him Israel was
about to attack Iraq’s nuclear reactor. As a result, Erdogan was
enraged and insulted. Turkish sources say Erdogan’s campaign of
insults against Israel in recent weeks is a reaction to this.

"Israel is the biggest provoker of terror in the world," the Turkish
justice minister accused. Erdogan no longer wants to talk to Olmert,
ties between Ankara and the Israeli ambassador have been cut off, an
Israeli basketball team was attacked by fans in Ankara and Israeli
tourists are advised to hold off on trips to Turkey. "Being in Ankara
feels like being in a hostile Arab country," an Israeli official
stationed in Turkey told Haaretz.

In Jordan, Prime Minister Nader al-Dahabi gave a speech in parliament
asking to "re-evaluate ties between Israel and Jordan," the first time
this has happened since the two countries made peace. No denials or
corrections were issued. "Jordan and Israel have important mutual
interests," an Israeli foreign ministry official said
indifferently. Do they? Does that argument take into account Jordan’s
delicate position regarding the Palestinians, Hamas or its general
public? How does that official respond to the Jordanian ambassador’s
return to Amman?

Qatar, which is on the list of moderate countries, still allows in
Israeli representatives and holds talks with Israel, but it is now
closer to the Syrian-Iranian axis than the Saudi-Egyptian one. Of all
the cease-fire initiatives, Qatar favors the one by Syria, which
supports Hamas. Qatar favors this over the Egyptian proposal. Saudi
Arabia, another moderate, has started to talk about "turning its back"
to its peace initiative unless the international community stops
Israel.

Just three weeks ago the regional leaders were euphoric. Turkey spoke
about continuing mediation between Israel and Syria, and its president
was about to visit Jerusalem; Syria talked about direct negotiations
with Israel; Jordan was steadfast in its traditional position of
guaranteed friendship with Israel; the foreign ministers of Qatar and
Israel acted like best buddies; and Saudi Foreign Minister Saud
al-Faisal said his country had no intention of abandoning the Saudi
peace initiative just because the Israeli right was benefiting from
it.

Such scenes have disappeared. Even our friendly partner, Palestinian
Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, has cut his ties. Israel is again
in a familiar situation: a threatened state, not speaking to any of
its neighbors and not willing for anyone to waste its time with talks.

Short-term tactics – that’s all Israel is capable of. On the issue of
relations with Turkey? They’ll need us when the U.S. Congress debates
the massacres of the Armenians. Upset Jordanians? They get water from
us and signed a free trade agreement with the United States thanks to
us. Qatar? It leans on our U.S. ally for support. Now it wants to join
the axis of evil? And Syria too is turning its back on us? We’ve told
everyone there is no partner for peace. Our key industry is war, not
peace or talks with our neighbors. We want only want Arabs as enemies.

For a moment it seemed like we convinced ourselves that ties with the
Arabs were not important until it turned out we needed Egypt’s help to
solve our "problems" with Hamas, and that Qatar helped solve the
crisis in Lebanon. And Jordan is able to keep the border safe and
until only recently we wanted so badly to meet with the Saudi king.

And there’s one more small, pestering problem keeping us from enjoying
our indifference toward our neighbors. Who has gained so far from the
situation? So far it is Hamas, which can claim to have undermined
greatly Israel’s ties with Turkey, Jordan and Qatar. And it has only
just begun.

5.html

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/105429