Armenian defence ministry hails military ties with Russia

ITAR-TASS, Russia
January 18, 2013 Friday 04:12 PM GMT+4

Armenian defence ministry hails military ties with Russia

YEREVAN January 18

– The Armenian defence minister hailed on Friday the level of
military-technical cooperation with Russia, stressing that it had been
upgraded to the interstate level.

“Our military and military-technical cooperation with Russia is at a
high level,” the minister stated summing up the last year cooperation
results. Russian-Armenian military-technical cooperation has been
upgraded from the intergovernmental to the interstate level, he
stressed. Defence Minister Seiran Oganyan reminded the audience that
an intergovernmental agreement on military-technical cooperation was
signed by the two countries back in February 2003.

According to him, “a draft agreement on the development of
military-technical cooperation, this time already an interstate
agreement, has been worked out and is at the final stage of
consideration by the Russian side”. The minister marked that the new
document envisages the possibility for signing contracts in the
military-technical sphere between organizations and enterprises of the
two countries, and besides on preferential terms.

Oganyan called work on that agreement “a major achievement”. According
to him, “military-technical cooperation with Russia sees a new stage
of development,” and apart from that Armenia has “a vast field for
updating military-technical cooperation also with other CSTO member
countries”.

Last year Moscow and Yerevan agreed to set up joint defence
enterprises in Armenia, the minister said. “This will give us a
possibility to develop the defence industry,” Oganyan believes.

Focusing on the activity of a Russian military base in Armenia, the
minister said in August 2010 he and the Russian counterpart signed
within the framework of a Russian president’s visit “an agreement in
which once again stated that during its long-term stationing in
Armenia the military base will be responsible equally with the
Armenian Armed Forces for ensuring security of the republic”.

“At the present moment this base fulfils its role also with taking
into consideration the aims of the neighboring on Armenia states and
their intentions towards Armenia,” the defence minister stressed. “Of
course, certain problems exist in the activity of the Russian military
base,” he admitted.

“We would like that the resources of the base that have
operational-strategic role be deployed in Armenia,” Oganyan reported.
According to him, necessary steps are being made in that direction
within the framework of the Collective Security Treaty Organization.

When asked whether Armenia is ready to have a Russian radar station on
its territory after Moscow’s refusal to use the Gabala Radar Station,
the minister said “we would not object”.

Syrian Christians are Syrians first

Gulf News (United Arab Emirates)
January 17, 2013 Thursday

Syrian Christians are Syrians first

by Joseph A. Kechichian | Senior Writer

If misguided Christian religious leaders attempted to portray the 2011
revolution as a conflict that did not concern them, and if they stood
by the Baath regime to protect their respective communities from
alleged “terrorists,” most of their flocks finally rejected the
official propaganda that drowned them in the rhetoric of victimisation
so dear to the regime of President Bashar Al Assad. What triggered
the transformation and will this radical shift accelerate the fall of
the Baath?

Inasmuch as fear, intimidation, bigotry, putative financial gains, and
latent racism coloured much of the oratory that was uttered by a few
company clerics, Christian civilians were not only perceived as mere
victims but became casualties as well. To be sure, some were kidnapped
and killed as extremists gained ground, although many more were fodder
in the hands of state authorities. Several prelates counselled
prudence as they positioned themselves on the side of the powerful
with the likes of Greek Orthodox Bishop Louqa Al Khoury or the Syriac
priest Gabriel Dawood participating in pro-government demonstrations
that supported Bashar Al Assad.

Such mixed messages confused masses, who believed that their leaders
rejected the revolution, though most quickly became victims of the
dreaded Mukhabarat. Indeed, some Christians were prosecuted, arrested
and sometimes executed by revolutionaries, but not because they were
Christians. Rather, as was the case with others, they died and
continue to perish because they collaborated with the regime, engaged
in spying activitiess, or otherwise assisted Damascus.

Christians were also caught between Free Syrian Army and Al Shabiha
confrontations, which eliminated any neutrality they professed, and
that translated into deaths and mayhem. Of course, and this was worth
repeating, such casualties were not the result of belonging to any
particular community, for deaths befell on all without discrimination.
If churches were destroyed, so were mosques and, it may be safe to
write at this stage that many more mosques were razed than chapels and
monasteries.

If many Christians were forced to abandon their homes, many more
Muslims were in similar situations, as looting was widespread and
indiscriminate. If about 200,000 of the estimated 3.5 million Syrian
Christians were displaced, it was also critical to note that their
forced departures were not related to their religious affiliation, but
the evolution of fighting on the ground, especially in Aleppo.

Several million Muslim Syrians became refugees and were also forced
out of their homes.

Naturally, Damascus successfully presented its quest for order, as
well as its justification on the use of extreme violence during the
past two years, as a posse effort to protect Christian communities.
The latter were “victims of the revolution,” everyone was told, as the
state played its “protection of minorities” song time and again. Yet,
and though Christian clerics polarised their communities by labelling
revolutionaries “rebels” or “bandits,” such erroneous sentiments were
corrected by intellectuals who gradually restored their tarnished
reputations as they insisted that Syrian Christians were Syrians
first.

Starting in March 2011, Christians questioned church authorities, as
they informed the clergy that the uprising was not about a class,
community or a particular religion. They insisted on freedom,
diversity, respect for life and property, all majestically commended
in the Gospels. Most important, intellectual voices cautioned the
clergy not to become a tool for the moribund political system that,
regrettably, failed to register. Leading political activists
intervened to tell the leaders of their communities to desist from
regurgitating the state’s arguments.

A 30-years old Jesuit priest, Nibras Chehayed, the `poet’ of the
revolution on account of his carefully drafted missives against the
blatant use of weapons to destroy Syria, was perhaps the most
eloquent. He replaced Father Paolo Dall’Oglio, the Italian-born cleric
who served at the Mar Mousa monastery for three decades, and who was
expelled by the regime in October 2012.

They were not alone. A Canadian-Syrian attorney, Hind Aboud Kabawat,
promoted interfaith tolerance and cooperation, while Marie Mamarbachi
Seurat, the Syriac faithful whose parents were forced out of Anatolia
during the 1915 Armenian massacres and whose erudite Middle East
scholar husband, Michel Seurat, was brutally murdered in 1986 (his
remains were found in Beirut’s Southern suburbs), fought to restore
Christian credibility in the country.

Ayman Abdul Nour, who ran the online news site All4Syria, as well as
the popular singer Lina Chamamyan, along with the president of the
Syrian National Council, Georges Sabra, all added their voices to the
chorus. None has been as eloquent as Michel Kilo, who insisted on his
patriotic stances irrespective of faith, and whose eloquence in logic
and word remained unparalleled.

As civilians warned priests, bishops and patriarchs against the
machinations of the intelligence services, it was gratifying to
finally note that, after much soul-searching, a few bold clerics
changed their discourse and literally sanctioned members of the clergy
whose actions aroused many months of faithful irritation. Those who
routinely appeared on official television were asked to end their
activities since they did not reflect the positions of the
overwhelming majority of Christians who aspired towards a civil
society.

Interestingly, the newly elected patriarch of the Greek Orthodox
Church of Antioch and all the East, joined the intellectual voices
that called for a careful reappraisal. During his first press
conference after his appointment in late December 2012, Bishop Yuhanna
Yaziji insisted that what happened to Christians happened to all other
Syrians and that Syrian Christians were “in the same situation as
any”. This was a breath of fresh air.

It illustrated that not all were mesmerised by cheap rhetoric and that
a new reading to realities on the ground showed the way for the
future.

Dr Joseph A. Kéchichian is the author of Legal and Political Reforms
in Saudi Arabia.

Intl community should recognize Nagorno-Karabakh – Sargsyan

Interfax, Russia
Jan 15 2013

Intl community should recognize Nagorno-Karabakh – Armenian president

YEREVAN. Jan 15

Armenia’s victory in its war against Azerbaijan for Nagorno-Karabakh
should be legally consolidated, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan
said.

“Our foreign policy’s main goal is a definitive legal consolidation of
the victory in the war unleashed by Azerbaijan against
Nagorno-Karabakh,” Sargsyan said at an expanded session at the
Armenian Defense Ministry attended by top-ranking officials from the
legislative, executive, and judicial branches.

“The international community should recognize Nagorno-Karabakh,
because there is no logical explanation why the nation that lawfully
exercised its right to self-determination and then defended it in an
uphill battle should be part of Azerbaijan,” he said.

Sargsyan accused Azerbaijan of continuing to violate the ceasefire
accords, the Armenian press service told Interfax. “The truce signed
at Azerbaijan’s request 19 years ago formalized the victory of the
Armenian self-defense forces. However, ignoring the truce, Azerbaijan
is shelling borders of not only Nagorno-Karabakh but also the Republic
of Armenia,” he said.

“I think our neighbors understand that a war, if it happens, will be
just as devastating for Azerbaijan as it is going to be devastating
for Armenia. They will be ready to resume the war if they believe they
have absolute superiority over Armenia,” Sargsyan said.

Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh do not wish a war but “nobody should
doubt that we will give a worthy response to any challenge,” he said.

va rb

Azerbaijan to keep to its territorial integrity principle in settlin

ITAR-TASS, Russia
January 15, 2013 Tuesday 09:30 PM GMT+4

Azerbaijan to keep to its territorial integrity principle in settling
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

BAKU January 15

– President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan has vowed his country will keep
to the principle of the country’s territorial integrity in its efforts
to settle the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

“There are principles we are not going to budge from. This problem
[the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict] must be tackled only on condition of
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity. All occupied territories must be
liberated,” Aliyev said on Tuesday at a government meeting dedicated
to the results of the country’s socio-economic development in 2012.
“This is a fair position, which is based on the international law. Our
position is immutable both in the legal and political terms.”

The Azerbaijani leader also noted that the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement
talks had been suspended “because of Armenia’s non-constructive
approach.” “I am sure that those forces in Armenia that are tackling
this issue in the light of reality are fully aware that the conflict
with Azerbaijan is fraught with nothing good,” he said.

Touching the subject of Azerbaijan’s defence potential, the president
said that the country’s defence-related expenses exceeded 3.5 billion
U.S. dollars in 2012 and will reach 3.7 billion U.S. dollars in 2013.

Baku asks OSCE to verify alleged resettlement of Syrian Armenians to

Interfax, Russia
Jan 14 2013

Baku asks OSCE to verify alleged resettlement of Syrian Armenians to Karabakh

BAKU. Jan 14

The resettlement of Syrian Armenians to the occupied Azeri lands is in
the focus of Baku’s attention, Azeri Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov told a Monday press conference.

“We have asked the OSCE Minsk Group cochairmen to monitor the illegal
resettlement of Syrian Armenians to these lands,” the minister said.

Mammadyarov said though that even if some Syrian Armenians had moved
to the occupied lands their number was insignificant.

Te jv

Origins of Caspers Hot Dogs: A tale of immigration and success out w

San Jose Mercury News (California)
January 10, 2013 Thursday

Origins of Caspers Hot Dogs: A tale of immigration and success out west

By Robert Rogers Contra Costa Times

Tracing the history of one of the Bay Area’s most enduring eateries is not easy.

“Nobody kept books or coherent records,” said Ron Dorian, grandson of
an original partner in Caspers Hot Dogs. “A lot of my knowledge of
company history was passed on from conversations with older relatives
and not from anything in writing.”

Dorian, 54, is the grandson of Steve Beklian, one of the five men who
established Caspers Hot Dogs in the East Bay between the 1920s and the
1940s.

It started in the 1920s, when Kasper Koojoolian, an Armenian
immigrant, decided to flee Chicago for the warmer climate and business
opportunities of California.

Dorian said the first store was in Oakland, and it was called “Kaspers.”

Kaspers’ success soon drew friends and family, including cousins like
Steve Beklian, business savvy restaurateur Paul Agajan, Hagop Beklian
and brother Paul Koojoolian.

“Agajan operated two cafeterias in Cicero before moving to California.
You had to be tough to operate businesses like that in Chicago in the
1930s,” Dorian said.

New stores popped up in Oakland and surrounding suburbs, including the
Richmond store in 1947.

As often happens in business startups, the family relationships were
strained by the growing enterprise. Kasper and his brother Paul
Koojoolian broke away and retained his “Kaspers” name, while the other
partners branched out and expanded their “Caspers” brand, Dorian said.
Paul’s son, Harold Koojoolian, still operates the Kaspers in Oakland.

Tragically, Kasper Koojoolian died in 1943 while en route to Fresno,
where he was looking for a ranch to buy. He always wanted to leave the
city and retire as a rancher, Dorian said.

Today, there are eight Caspers with 12 owners, including Dorian, all
descendants of the original five.

But it all started with a dream and impossible odds.

“The Koojoolian brothers and Beklian brothers emigrated as young boys
— all together with no adults — fleeing Turkey with money their
parents gave them,” Dorian said. “The parents couldn’t leave — and
they knew their children would be killed if they stayed. The five of
them made it from their village in Turkey to France and sailed to
Philadelphia and crossed to Chicago at a time in their lives that kids
today would still be in school. Their closeness cannot be
underestimated.”

Shakhtar 3-2 Al-Hilal: Henrikh Mkhitaryan goal author (video)

Shakhtar 3-2 Al-Hilal: Henrikh Mkhitaryan goal author (video)

22:20 – 19.01.13

Donetsk’s Shakhtar beat Al-Hilal 3-2 in the latest round of the
Matchworld Cup 2013 tournament.

Armenian midfielder Henrikh Mkhitaryan hit the first goal at the 20th
minute of the match. The score was evened at the 28th minute by Yu Ben
Su. But Shakhtar took advantage in the second half. After receiving a
pass from Arna, Rats became a goal author. The team’s last goal was
hit at the 88th minute by Tayson, who replaced Mkhitaryan after the
interval.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2013/01/19/shaxtar1/

Crime Boss Murder Won’t Mean Comeback For Russian Mafia

CRIME BOSS MURDER WON’T MEAN COMEBACK FOR RUSSIAN MAFIA
Vitaliy Belousov

RIA Novosti

Mafia Boss Gunned Down in Moscow

MOSCOW, January 18 (Alexey Eremenko, Alexandra Odynova, RIA Novosti)
– Aslan “Gramps Khasan” Usoyan was leaving his favorite restaurant
in central Moscow when a bullet from a silenced assault rifle hit
him in the neck.

The portly 75-year-old’s private guards pushed him back inside, but
more bullets sailed through the closed door, piercing the backside
of a woman nearby, costing her 4½ liters of blood. Usoyan’s consorts
sped him to the hospital in a Mercedes jeep, where doctors proclaimed
him dead on arrival.

Wednesday’s assassination robbed the Russian underworld of one of
its last legendary greats, and stirred up memories of the bloody turf
wars that grabbed headlines in the country’s “turbulent 1990s.”

But experts do not foresee a revival of the all-mighty “Russkaya
mafiya” of that time, with its glorified image and omnipresence in
pop culture. On the contrary, they believe Russian organized crime has
settled into a pattern similar to many other countries’, focusing on
a few lucrative, mostly illegal domains, but outgunned and outmanned
by government bodies, who have regained the upper hand over the past
decade or so.

“Organized crime has been marginalized in Russia in recent years,
returning to the niche it is supposed to occupy,” said sociology
professor Vadim Volkov, an expert on Russian mafia at the European
University at St. Petersburg.

Life After Gramps In press reports, Usoyan had long been labeled
Russia’s most influential “thief-in-law” – a title denoting a don of
the underworld both in Soviet and post-Soviet criminal culture. His
spheres of activity have been rumored to include drugs, guns and
construction materials, including some lucrative deals involving next
year’s Olympics in the southern Russian city of Sochi.

After his death, Russian media swelled with speculation, blaming the
hit on Usoyan’s numerous rivals, who supposedly opted not to wait
until his planned retirement later this year and the ascent of a
nephew he had carefully groomed as successor.

The Investigative Committee, roughly comparable to Russia’s FBI,
also said it was looking into a possible dispute among crime bosses
as the cause of Usoyan’s shooting.

Logically, predictions of impending gang warfare followed.

But similar forecasts abounded after the 2009 assassination –
possibly by the same killer, according to one tabloid – of thief-in-law
Vyacheslav Ivankov, known as Yaponchik or “Little Japanese.” And those
forecasts failed to materialize, at least in any high-profile way.

The Russian mafia has reached an era of stability, settling all its
major disputes and dividing up territory, said Alexander Gurov, a
former head of the State Duma Security Committee who made his name
in the Soviet Interior Ministry fighting organized crime in the 1980s.

“It took the Sicilian mafia about two centuries, a few decades for
the United States. It took the Russian mafia two decades,” Gurov said.

Racketeering Regulators One obituary called Usoyan, before his death,
“the last surviving mammoth” of a bygone age. Indeed, Gramps Khasan
emerged from a criminal subculture believed to have started taking
shape around the time of his birth, in the 1930s.

Soviet-era thieves-in-law, who earned their stripes in prison, had
intricate codes of etiquette and behavior enforced with no less
zeal than the Criminal Code. They eschewed the state and derived
sustenance from a classic mix of robbery and fraud, but gradually
also from a shadow economy that started taking root in the Soviet
Union in the 1960s, despite – or, perhaps, because of – bans on
private entrepreneurship.

And it was this very connection to business that came to play the
pivotal role in the rise of Russian mafia in the 1990s, experts told
RIA Novosti.

The Soviet Union’s demise wreaked chaos in established state
institutions in Russia and other post-Soviet countries, leaving them
crippled and unequipped to deal with a new capitalist reality, said
Andrei Soldatov, editor-in-chief of Agentura.ru, a non-profit online
think-tank studying Russian law enforcement services.

Old bastions of law enforcement like police and courts were incapable
of helping newly emerging businessmen settle disputes or providing
them with protection, Soldatov said.

And so the mafia stepped in to fill the void.

Protection became a service offered by ubiquitous and highly
territorial racketeer gangs that settled conflicts through organized
showdowns involving dozens of people and, as often as not, a lot
of rapid machine gun fire. The country’s most prominent newspapers,
like Kommersant and the now defunct Segodnya, devoted daily spreads
to casualty reports and stories about thieves’-in-law activity.

The State Duma said in a report in 1998 that up to 40 percent of
private companies and 85 percent of banks nationwide were controlled
by organized crime.

A rare poll from 1998-1999, cited in a textbook by the Russian
Criminological Association, showed that 30 percent of businessmen in
Moscow were somehow involved with organized crime groups.

At the same time, the old-school Soviet criminal culture collided
with a new crop of gangsters, unencumbered by such elaborate rules
and balking at nothing to carve themselves a piece of someone else’s
juicy turf.

These SUV-driving, gun-toting, crimson-jacket-wearing thugs, who
constructed mammoth marble tombstones to their fallen brethren,
permeated the nation’s life and sensibility.

Kitschy, sappy and primitive tunes about the mafia’s struggles, known
as “chanson,” became a staple of Russia’s musical diet in the 1990s,
even among those who’d never been near a gun or jail, and the first
domestic films and television shows to rival Hollywood productions
were gangster tales.

This was also when the Russian mafia became a global phenomenon,
taking advantage of the newly opened opportunities for travel and
tapping immigrant communities abroad to join global networks of
drug, arms and human trafficking – and to popularize the notions of
onion-dome tattoos, perpetual scowls and ridiculous accents that can
now be found anywhere from a Grand Theft Auto video game to David
Cronenberg’s filmography.

The Silovikis’ Revenge The tide changed at the turn of the third
millennium, when the Russian state started to restore its functions
as arbiter and its coercive power.

Disputes could now be solved in arbitrage courts and protection
obtained from private security companies, said Volkov of St.

Petersburg’s European University.

Lower taxes in the early 2000s also delivered a blow to the shadow
economy, he said.

Most crucially, the security and law enforcement services, or
“siloviki,” resurgent under the presidency of ex-KGB officer Vladimir
Putin, could now provide high-level protection to entrepreneurs,
who were quick to capitalize on it.

“When the law enforcement services got their strength back, the
businessmen flocked to them,” said Soldatov of Agentura.ru.

The new system was very corruption-prone, with law enforcement
officials charging money for protection and abusing the law when it
suited them or businesses in their care, Soldatov said. By the late
2000s, the Russian business community realized it had been overwhelmed
and taken over by those it originally hired to protect it, he added.

Corrupt officials, or “white-collar criminals,” pose a much greater
danger to Russia today than the thieves-in-law, Gurov said.

But early in the game, the “siloviki” option looked much more
attractive than the mafia, with its violent gunfights and other rough
tactics. So the official-looking guys took away market share from
the shadier-seeming ones, both experts said.

No More Songs In 1998, Russian police estimated the number of known
thieves-in-law across the world at 1,560. But by 2010, the last
year for which statistics were available, they numbered about 150,
according to Russia’s Interior Ministry.

Back in 2008, declaring the war on the Russian mafia victorious,
the Kremlin disbanded police units combatting organized crime and
created an anti-extremism department instead, which busied itself
cracking down on political dissenters.

Russian organized crime has not disappeared, but its activity is now
mostly limited to traditional domains such as arms trade, illegal
drugs and prostitution, Volkov said.

“It is a part of the [society’s] eco-system, you could say, and nobody
[in the law enforcement services] sees it as a serious threat anymore,”
Soldatov said.

Many crime bosses have turned a new leaf, investing money earned in
the 1990s in perfectly legitimate enterprises, said Kirill Kabanov,
who heads the National Anti-Corruption Committee. The late Usoyan was
reported to run several hotels in southern Russia in addition to his
other pursuits.

A handful of minor gangs from the past “that attract the youth through
a romanticized vision of crime” have survived, but only in remote
backwaters, Kabanov said.

“New ethnic Asian groups from Tajikistan and others” have emerged,
but “they are not yet rich and don’t wield much power,” he added.

Most importantly, the legend of the Russian mafia itself is fading from
the nation’s mind. There are no more daily briefs on goings-on in the
gangster world in the media, and a criminal career is not attracting
the young: According to a nationwide poll by state-run VTsIOM in 2009,
the list of young Russians’ dream jobs is topped by posts at national
gas giant Gazprom and the Kremlin administration. By contrast, media
in the 1990s often cited anonymous polls of high school students who
named “mafia hitman” and “prostitute” as their highest job aspirations.

Glorious mafiosi have been sidelined by college students and medical
interns on primetime television, and “chanson” performers are outsold
by a new breed of artists who, music reviewers say, sing essentially
the same songs, but with lyrics about love and life instead of gang
shootings and doin’ time.

“The Russian mafia is sticking to its old violent ways,” Volkov said.

“It’s just that the public isn’t paying much attention to it anymore.”

Unm Slams Ivanishvili For Naming Armenia As Model For Ties With Russ

UNM SLAMS IVANISHVILI FOR NAMING ARMENIA AS MODEL FOR TIES WITH RUSSIA, NATO

Civil Georgia, Tbilisi / 18 Jan.’13 / 20:29

President Saakashvili’s United National Movement (UNM) party said on
January 18 that PM Bidzina Ivanishvili’s remarks that Armenia was
“an example” for Georgia how it is possible to have good relations
with both NATO and Russia was “alarming” and “dangerous”.

“Armenia is our friendly state and I respect their choice, but Armenian
path and its relation with Russia and NATO cannot serve as [a model]
for Georgia; it is in conflict with Georgia’s state interests,”
UNM secretary general and former PM Vano Merabishvili said.

A senior UNM lawmaker Giorgi Gabashvili said that Armenia, which is a
member of Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO)
and which cooperates with NATO but does not seek its membership,
cannot serve as a model for Georgia’s foreign policy.

“It would amount to U-turn in Georgia’s foreign policy,” he said.

“This is very alarming and very dangerous for Georgia.”

Another UNM lawmaker Davit Darchiashvili said that “nothing more
scandalous and alarming” than that had been said by new government
since coming into power three months ago.

“If it was said because of lack of experience that’s also source of
alarm,” MP Darchiashvili said.

Foreign Minister Maia Panjikidze said on January 18 that there were
no changes in Georgia’s foreign policy.

“I do agree with the course that Georgia should try to have good
relations with everyone. That’s what every normal country tries and
many of them achieve it. What the PM said is that it’s desirable to
have good relations with everyone,” she said.

When asked during an interview with the RFE/RL Armenian service on
January 17, when PM Ivanishvili visited Yerevan, if Georgia’s foreign
policy priorities would change, he responded: “In the near future it’s
hardly [possible], but in general countries develop, people develop,
society develops and they change priorities, but I do not think that
in the near future we will be changing our priorities.”

“We have stated about our priorities for multiple times – that’s Europe
and Euro-Atlantic alliance; we will unwaveringly follow this path,”
Ivanishvili said.

“But in parallel to it a question arises: is it possible to combine
restoration of friendly relations with Russia and at the same time to
have good relations with NATO and to aspire towards NATO and to have
good relations with the United States and NATO-member states? I think
that here Armenia is a good example; Armenia gives a good example
for Georgia and it can be a source of envy in positive sense,” the
Georgian PM said.

“Armenia is on excellent terms with Russia and has friendly relations
with [Russia] while also being on excellent terms with the United
States and with other NATO-member states. So I think it’s possible
and I think that we have to and I believe that we will combine it,”
Ivanishvili added.

http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=25657

Minister – Expressionist

MINISTER – EXPRESSIONIST

Wednesday, 16 January 2013 15:45

On the eve of a new year, as you know, it is accepted to sum up the
year past. This practice is as old as the world, and Foreign Minister
of Azerbaijan Elmar Mamedyarov did not either break the tradition. In
an interview to some news agencies, he presented the activity of
his office in 2012 and touched upon a series of issues of the foreign
policy agenda. Judging by the statements of the Minister on the results
of the past year, we can conclude that Azerbaijan definitely completed
the year of 2012 with solid achievements at the international arena.

They are strengthening of the positions of the Azerbaijani Republic
in the world and acquisition of new partners through its membership in
the UN Security Council, cooperation with international organizations
for establishing peace and security in Africa and the Middle East,
partnership with NATO for restoring and strengthening peace in
Afghanistan, etc.

In short, no matter where you cast a glance – there are only
achievements. This is the rainbow foreign-policy picture painted with
the expressive colors of the Azerbaijani Foreign Minister. According
to Mamedyarov, the Azerbaijani diplomacy suffered only one
failure – it is to resolve the Karabakh conflict (surely, in the
favorite-for-it direction), and as you can easily guess, just due to
the “unconstructive position of Armenia,” which, in the minister’s
mind, remains the major obstacle. And in the rest, as it is said in
a famous comic song, “all is well, all is well”.

But, just a quick look at Mamedyarov’s assessments of Azerbaijan’s
foreign policy is enough to note a feature, which is important
for the “reporting year”: his long interview lacked the “main
achievements” of 2012 – the extradition of the Budapest murderer,
Safarov. Especially that the repatriation and hasty pardon of the
killer sentenced to life imprisonment, which were the result of the
shameful Azerbaijani-Hungarian deal, were called a great diplomatic
victory of Azerbaijan. Why doesn’t Mamedyarov include this “victory”
in the assets of the Azerbaijani diplomacy? Isn’t it because
this, in fact, criminal act, exactly described by former Russian
mediator Vladimir Kazimirov as “a blunder of Ilham Aliyev’s team”,
will merely spoil the idyllic picture made by Mamedyarov’s creative
imagination? Isn’t it also because it was severely condemned by many
international structures and prominent politicians, including the
heads of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairing states? The opinion was
unequivocal – the pardon and glorification of the killer of a sleeping
man are incompatible with the concept of human morality; besides,
these actions of the Azerbaijani authorities struck a serious blow
to the Karabakh settlement process.

Of course, the Baku regime understands that its “diplomatic success”
didn’t only strike a blow to the peace process, but also seriously
stained and devalued the already questionable image of Azerbaijan at
the international arena, if one can generally speak of a political
image of Azerbaijan from the positive viewpoint (without counting the
petrodollars). And all the cheerful talks of the Azerbaijani Foreign
Minister on strengthening Azerbaijan’s position at the international
arena are suitable only for misleading their own people and are
hardly able to wash away the shame of Budapest and to save the face
of official Baku. Rather, the insatiable desire to neutralize the
negative impression of the Budapest killer’s history encourages the
Azerbaijani party to make false pacifist statements.

Realizing the expectations of the international community, constantly
calling for the peaceful settlement of the conflict and restoration
of confidence between the societies of the conflicting parties,
Mamedyarov represents his country as a supporter of peace and “a
guarantee of security, stability and progress in the region” (!!!).

Truly loose tongue! Mamedyarov noted even the possibility of “a real
program of the Nagorno-Karabakh region’s development to be offered
by Azerbaijan”. Then he went further, losing the sense of proportion
and reality, and uttered the following: “We perceive the Armenians,
living in Nagorno-Karabakh, as our citizens and we want them to live
in good conditions”. We will not comment here and now on the thesis of
the Azerbaijani Minister on “our citizens”, which has no legal basis.

We’ll only note that this hypocritical tolerance is demonstrated rather
to the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairing countries and the international
community as a whole. It is worth noting that the international
Christian organization Open Doors has recently published a list of
50 countries where Christians are mostly persecuted.

Azerbaijan occupies the 38th place in the list. In short, we can
safely assume that the pacifist speech of Mamedyarov is aimed just
at one thing – to restore, at least in part, the lost reputation.

But, the whole problem of Azerbaijan is that the words of its
politicians run counter to their deeds. They do not wish to understand
that the restoration of their reputation is directly linked to
the restoration of confidence between the Armenian and Azerbaijani
people, for which, first of all, they should stop the policy of hatred
towards Armenians and should refuse of the threats of a new war. In
the meantime, the president of Azerbaijan, as it was on the New Year
eve, is delivering a refrain only on restoration of a different kind:
“We cannot allow the creation of the fictitious second Armenian state
on the historical (?!) lands of Azerbaijan. The time will come when
Azerbaijan will restore its territorial integrity by any means”. In
other words, the president disavowed the pacifist statements of his
own minister- expressionist.

Leonid MARTIROSSIAN Editor-in-Chief of Azat Artsakh newspaper

http://artsakhtert.com/eng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=902:minister-expressionist-&catid=3:all&Itemid=4