Companies Threaten To Halt Public Transportation If Fare Is Not Rais

COMPANIES THREATEN TO HALT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IF FARE IS NOT RAISED

11.07.2013 20:16 epress.am

Heads of transportation companies held a protest today outside Yerevan
City Hall, demanding to accelerate the work of the commission dealing
with transportation issues and increase the public transportation
fare as soon as possible; otherwise, they promise to resort to
“radical” actions.

Company managers said they will wait three days for a clear answer
and then hold discussions, and if their needs are not met, they
are prepared to stop serving public transportation routes. Note, in
Armenia, public transportation routes are served by private companies.

Hayk Yeghiazaryan, chair of the union of transport carriers of Armenia,
in conversation with Epress.am, said their patience has run out, and
they can no longer meet transportation needs under the current rate
(which is 100 AMD, about $0.25).

“Raising the fare is unavoidable, and if things continue as they
are, tomorrow we will walk the walk. Whatever reserves we had are all
exhausted; everyone is mired in debt and cannot buy tires or batteries,
undergo inspection or repair, or pay property tax or compulsory car
insurance. We’ve reached a dead end; there’s nowhere to go anymore,” he
said, promising that after the fare is increased, business plans will
be presented, loans will be drawn, and a new fleet will be acquired.

“Minibuses won’t be overloaded; with a new fleet we will serve our
people in a more civilized fashion. Minibuses will be replaced with
large-capacity buses. Then you won’t ride crowded but standing or
sitting,” said the chair of the union.

According to him, they didn’t hold protests in the past because
they are “working people,” but they learned to hold protests from
activists. “There’s something to learn from everyone, and today we
used this choice of struggle.”

Tigran Hovhannisyan, chair of the bus drivers’ defense league, in turn,
told Epress.am that representatives of several NGOs earlier discussed
the demands put forth by the transportation companies and said that
they’re convinced that such conduct is a mere formality.

“They’re saying this is staged by the municipality: ‘Come and protest
in front of us,’ they say. Halting public transportation service for
even one hour is ruled out, and if that happens then the mayor must
resign,” said Hovhannisyan.

http://www.epress.am/en/2013/11/07/companies-threaten-to-halt-public-transportation-if-fare-is-not-raised.html

Israel Has Given Special Role To Azerbaijan In Its Plan Of Iran’s Is

ISRAEL HAS GIVEN SPECIAL ROLE TO AZERBAIJAN IN ITS PLAN OF IRAN’S ISOLATION

16:55 05/11/2013 ” REGION

Israel’s Foreign Ministry has prepared a secret plan to isolate Iran,
and a very special role is given to Azerbaijan in this regard, writes
the Azerbaijani news portal “Haqqin.az” referring to Israeli sources.

According to the information, in exchange for assistance in the process
of isolating Iran, Israel presents real economic and political aid
to Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

Portal reminds that the Israeli ambassadors to three republics
neighboring Iran – Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan – were
summoned to Tbilisi for a meeting with Zeev Elkin the Deputy Minister
of the Foreign Affairs of Israel.

The ambassadors were summoned to Tbilisi for getting instructions in
connection with the situation over the Iranian nuclear program.

Israel’s concern is caused by the positive change of the attitude of
the West towards Iran after the new president of Iran took the office.

As noted in the material, apparently the meeting of the ambassadors in
Tbilisi is directly connected to the Israeli plans of isolating Iran.

According to diplomatic sources, the Israeli side has committed to
share with Azerbaijan and other neighbors of Iran with information
about the activities of various extremist organizations sponsored
by Tehran. Israel has also promised to help in the fight against
the radicals who have returned to these countries from Syria. In
addition, the official Tel Aviv offers these countries a social
assistance program, implying assistance in the development of health,
energy and agriculture. In return, Israel demands only one thing –
isolation of Iran.

The article notes that in this regard Israel has given a special
place to Azerbaijan and Georgia. A proof of this serves the recent
abolition of the visa regime between Israel and Georgia. “We can
tell with confidence that the plan of Iran’s isolation is presented
to the Azerbaijani authorities as well as to other countries. Baku’s
disposition regarding this plan is still unknown,” the article states.

The author draws attention to the special relationship existing
between Baku and Tel Aviv. Azerbaijan buys Israeli contemporary
weapons which cost billions of dollars, and the Western media claims
that Azerbaijan has provided its airfields to Israel for possible air
strikes on Iran. However, the official Baku denies this information.

http://www.panorama.am/en/politics/2013/11/05/israel-iran-azerbaijan/

Viktor Khristenko: There Are Neither Obstacles To Nor Any Approximat

VIKTOR KHRISTENKO: THERE ARE NEITHER OBSTACLES TO NOR ANY APPROXIMATE DATE OF ARMENIA’S ACCESSION TO CUSTOMS UNION

by Arthur Yernjakyan

Wednesday, November 6, 18:36

There are neither obstacles to nor any approximate date of Armenia’s
accession to the Customs Union, Viktor Khristenko, Head of the Eurasian
Economic Commission Collegium told media in Yerevan, on 5 November,
after signing a Memorandum of Deepening Cooperation between the
Eurasian Economic Commission and Armenia. On the Armenian party,
Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan signed the document.

In response to ArmInfo’s question about at least approximate date of
Armenia’s accession to the CU, Khristenko just said that the process
is not easy and needs tangible preparatory measures and adjustment
of the national legislation.

“Therefore, I prefer not to give any date,” he said. Khristenko
said that the working group for Armenia’s accession to the Customs
Union must be set up by 20 November at the meeting of the Council’s
Commission.

He underlined that neither Kazakhstan nor Belarus create obstacles
to accession of Armenia and other CIS countries to the CU.

“I see no obstacles on that way. These are no obstacles, but a desire
to make the process more robust and avoid measures at the expense of
the quality. There are no unresolvable issues for Armenia’s accession
to the CU. Neither there are any political issues torpedoing the
process,” Khristenko said.

He said that 36 countries have already come out for cooperation with
the Customs Union. “India has recently expressed desire to launch
advanced cooperation with the CU. Certain measures are currently
being taken to launch such advanced cooperation with Vietnam, New
Zealand, European Free Trade Association. We will start similar work
with Switzerland,” Khristenko said. He outlined that Turkey is not
among the above 36 countries, despite Kazakh President’s suggestion
to invite Turkey to the CU. “Turkey is not among those countries.

Consequently, the suggestion is not studied,” he said.

To recall, the presidents of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia adopted a
decision to sign the given Memorandum at the meeting of the Supreme
Eurasian Economic Council in Minsk on 24 October. Earlier on 3
September in Moscow, at the meeting with RF President Vladimir Putin,
President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan expressed an intention to join
the CU and take all the necessary practical steps to this end, as well
as participate in formation of the Eurasian Economic Union in future.

http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=3D463860-46F9-11E3-8BE50EB7C0D21663

Boxing: ‘The Raging Bull’: Darchinyan Bent On Revenge Against ‘Overr

‘THE RAGING BULL’: DARCHINYAN BENT ON REVENGE AGAINST ‘OVERRATED’ DONAIRE

Examiner.com
Nov 6 2013

I caught up with three-division world champion Vic “The Raging Bull”
Darchinyan for an exclusive interview just a few days ahead of his
rematch against Nonito Donaire, Jr. to get his thoughts on the rematch
that he has been seeking since dropping his first loss in their first
encounter back in 2007.

The 37-year-old Armenian boxing dynamo is climbing up to the
featherweight division for the first time for a chance to extract
revenge against Donaire. Darchinyan had some choice words for Donaire,
whom he considers as “overrated” and has carefully selected opponents
he can beat on his way to rising atop boxing’s pound-for-pound
rankings.

Donaire, who was named the 2012 boxing writers’ Fighter of the Year,
is coming off a disappointing loss to Guillermo Rigondeaux last April,
and is also seeking his own redemption after being schooled by the
2-time Olympic Gold Medalist from Cuba.

The bout is one of three featured fights this weekend on HBO together
with a super featherweight title bout between Rocky Martinez and
Mikey Garcia, as well as a vacant junior middleweight title fight
between Vanes Martirosyan and Demetrius Andrade.

Check out the transcript of my interview with Darchinyan below:

dSource: “How are you, Vic? How is your camp going?”

Darchinyan: “My preparation has been very good. I’ve been very happy
with my training I am ready to go to war and show the world not only
my power but also my boxing skills . This will be Donaire’s hardest
ever fight and it will be his second loss in a row.”

dSource: “The weight – You are moving up considerably at featherweight
where Donaire seems to be more comfortable at this point of his
career. Are you planning to maintain your usual weight, or try to bulk
up and add power? What, if any, changes have you made in training?”

Darchinyan: “I normally have to come down from about 140 lbs.,
so fighting at 126 is going make me stronger. I had a very good
preparation in Australia where I added a lot of muscle and strength
and it set a good foundation for my training in America.

I have been working more on my skill by preparing much earlier. My
speed is better because strength from not wasting as much as I would
at super bantamweight. It both our first time at featherweight so I
think who handles it better on the night will have the advantage.

It’s good to hear that Nonito had a good preparation and that he will
have no excuses when he is beaten on Saturday.”

dSource: “There is a lot of bad blood in this fight, but it’s been a
while. Is it still personal for you or are you approaching this just
like any other fight?”

Darchinyan: “I approach all my fights the same.

I want to win all my fights, the same as any fighter. Sometimes I think
people expect me to say I would like to lose every fight I go into.

I want to win every fight I’m in and win by knockout this is my job,
this is how I feed my family, I come to win every fight if I wasn’t
thinking that I would be crazy.

Of course there is bad blood. It has happened because this fight
should’ve happened long time ago. I wanted this fight as soon as the
first fight finished. He wants to beat me, I want to beat him and
knock him out. First I will punish him then I will show the world
that he is overrated, that he is a pretender.”

dSource: “Are you trying to go for a KO and what would it mean for
you to avenge that KO loss to Donaire?”

Darchinyan: “A KO would be great but the win comes first. I fight to
win, I fight to knock my opponent out. I have been dreaming of this
fight for the last six years . I know I’m more skilled than Donaire, I
know I’m stronger than Donaire and I know I’m smarter than Donaire. He
will feel what I felt six years ago and he will know exactly what
he’s in for and that is a very long night of being punished by me.”

dSource: “Did you watch his fight vs. Rigondeaux? Did you see anything
in that fight that you can use against Donaire? I know your style
is way different from Rigo, but are you considering switching up the
way you fight, or do you feel you can beat Donaire by just being the
usual Vic Darchinyan?”

Darchinyan: “I saw the fight and I knew that Rigo would outbox him
and beat him. Donaire has been fighting fighters from flyweight and
super flyweight that can’t punch.

Every fighter he beat wouldn’t fight me when I was fighting at a
lower weights. I’ve had over 300 amateur fights. I know how to box,
but in our game if you box you look boring.

We are fighting at weights where everyone wants to see entertainment
and punchers. Look at Rigo, he beat Donaire easily when Nonito was
top 5 pound-for-pound and he couldn’t get a fight anywhere. At least
I know with Nonito, he comes to fight and I come to fight, except
this time he will be getting a lesson in pain.

You will see the normal Vic Darchinyan mixed with some nice skills
that will end with a devastating win. I can’t wait because this is
what boxing is all about. I know a lot of Donaire’s fans think this
will be a easy fight, but I promise all boxing fans make sure you
watch the fight because I am going to show the world this will be his
hardest fight ever. His head will be very sore at the end of the night.

dSource: “Why has it taken so long for this rematch to happen?”

Darchinyan: “Promoters don’t like each other. Promoters don’t like
fighters leaching them. I can honestly say I wanted this fight 6 years
ago. Before the Agbeko fight I signed the contract the first day I
got it, then I waited 2 months to see the fight fall over. Anyway,
it’s happening now which I am very happy about. Thank you to my
promoter Top Rank and my manager Frank Espinoza for making it possible.

dSource: “What have you learned from that loss against Donaire and can
you tell us how that loss changed you as a person and as a fighter?”

Darchinyan: “I’ve learned that I need to box, be patient and everything
will happen. Wait and see the first time I land clean on his chin,
watch the fear in his eyes. He will know that this was the worst fight
ever for him. We are the same height, same weight, except I have more
power and I am going to show the skills I have to destroy him.

dSource: “Also want to get your thoughts on Manny Pacquiao. He got
KOed in his last fight. Do you think he can still bounce back and
beat Rios and be the way he was before the way you were able to bounce
back from that KO loss to Donaire in 2007?”

Darchinyan: “Manny is great fighter. He’s a southpaw with big power
and I think he will come back and show why he is one of best pound for
pound fighters. I have many Filipino fans and they know that I have
chosen Manny in nearly every fight he has had in the last 15 fights.

Manny is going to win by knockout against Rios. Us southpaws have to
stick together.

dSource: “Lastly, any messages to your fans and supporters?”

Darchinyan: “Thank you to my fans in Armenia, Australia, America and
all around the world. Thank you for being by my side all the time.

Make sure your watching on Saturday night because when I beat Donaire
this win is for all of you!”

dSource: “Thank you so much for your time, Vic. I know all your fans
have been waiting for this fight and best of luck to you.”

Darchinyan: “Thank you for the interview.”

– DG –

http://www.examiner.com/article/the-raging-bull-darchinyan-bent-for-revenge-against-overrated-donaire

David Babayan: It Is Time To Give Renewed Impetus To Negotiations

DAVID BABAYAN: IT IS TIME TO GIVE RENEWED IMPETUS TO NEGOTIATIONS

Wednesday,
November
06

“The negotiations are continuing based on the Madrid Principles, which
are the main principles of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement.

Yet I believe that the Co-Chairs also take the view that it is time
to give renewed impetus to the negotiating process and submit new
proposals,” the spokesman for President of the Nagorno Karabakh
Republic David Babayan told Aysor.am when commenting on the recent
statement of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs and the negotiating
process.

Underlining the importance of the Co-chairs’ efforts to arrange a
summit of the two presidents, David Babayan said that there is much
work to be done because Azerbaijan’s position has not changed and
Baku continues its destructive policy.

TODAY, 18:22

Aysor.am

ANKARA: Another Taboo Finally Addressed: Muslim(Ized) Armenians Of T

ANOTHER TABOO FINALLY ADDRESSED: MUSLIM(IZED) ARMENIANS OF TURKEY

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Nov 4 2013

4 November 2013 /CUMALİ ONAL, İSTANBUL A recent conference held in
Turkey dealt with a topic which, though it has been widely discussed
on a private level, has not received much open focus: Muslim Armenians.

Many academics from abroad and within Turkey attended the “Islamized
(Islamicized) Armenians” conference held at İstanbul’s Bogazici
University in partnership with the Hrant Dink Foundation and the
Association of Philanthropic Malatya Armenians (HAYDER).

Speaking to Today’s Zaman, many academics noted that while the topic of
Armenians who were forced to convert to Islam in one way or another
is an important aspect of the tragedy of 1915, it is not a topic
which has been widely discussed or debated.

AyÅ~_egul Altınay, the director of the Hrant Dink Foundation and one
of the organizers of the conference, said that Muslimized Armenians
in fact played a very important role in the re-shaping of Turkish
society at the start of the century. Altınay, who is also one of the
authors of the book “Torunlar” (Grandchildren), a work which focuses
on Turkish families with Armenians in them, maintained that Turkey has
remained deaf and blind to this important topic for the past century.

Another conference organizer, HAYDER head Hosrof Köletavitoglu,
noted that while the topic of Muslimized Armenians is one which many
have wanted to confront, it is a topic which has not been faced. “This
society needs to throw off some of this baggage so that it can run,”
Köletavitoglu said.

The three-day conference dealt with topics such as the HemÅ~_in
Muslims, the Hamidiye massacres and mass religious conversions,
assimilation, the problem of Arabized Armenians and stories from the
actual unfolding of the tragedies in 1915. Attendees also heard from
people who were forced to convert to Islam and those who had spoken
directly with such people about their experiences. In addition, there
was some focus on topics like Armenian food, literature and music.

Altınay noted that some historians say the number of Armenians who
became Muslim through marriages, adoptions or after being taken under
protection by other families and were thus saved during the forced
relocations of 1915 could be around 200,000.

She said that even if these numbers were only around 100,000, keeping
in mind all the children who have since been born to these Armenians
in the meantime, the numbers would now be in the millions.

Simply mentioning that there was an Armenian in one’s family was for
many years a significant factor in people being excluded, Altınay
said. “We saw how for years, having an Armenian mother or grandmother
meant that people would lose their jobs or cause more difficulties
for them during their military service. For example, one well-known
pious name from society was going to join this conference but decided
not to at the last minute.”

Ethnically Armenian Sami Boyacı joined this conference as an attendee.

He noted that widespread fear that Armenians were going to be targeted
around the time he was born was what caused his parents to give him
the Turkish-sounding name “Sami.” He noted that many people around the
time gave their otherwise Armenian children Turkish names. Boyacı
spoke about how his grandfather and his grandaunt in fact survived
the tragedies of 1915 but, like so many others, it was only through
the help of Muslim neighbors that they were able to do so.

Conference participant Ishkhan Chiftjian, who attended this conference
from Germany, has roots that go back to Adana. He noted that, for
Armenians, this Bogazici University conference was extremely unusual.

Chiftjian, a professor at Hamburg University, maintained that the
whole topic of Muslimized Armenians is a very different and new area
for Armenians.

In the meantime, Sarkis Saropian, one of the founders of the well-known
Armenian-language Agos newspaper, noted that “there ought to have been
more Muslims in attendance at this conference.” He underlined that,
in terms of the topic, the conference carried off a first in the world.

Saropian, noting that it is impossible to actually determine the number
of Muslim Armenians living in Turkey, said: “Since we don’t even know
how many Armenians are living in this country, figuring out how many
Muslim Armenians there are is really impossible. During census counts
taken after the 1930s, asking people about their ethnic roots was
forbidden. So even the state — which labeled us as non-Muslims —
does not know the number of people with Armenians in their family.”

Saropian said that while he had made a request to gain access to code
numbers allegedly used by public agencies to tag individuals according
to their ethnic background, in order to learn how many Armenians
there were in İstanbul, no response had been given. Saropian also
added that one of the heads of one of Turkey’s most famous football
clubs was Armenian but that he had never publically acknowledged this.

Altınay noted that while she had spoken to many people while doing the
research for her book “Torunlar,” most of the people had not wanted
their names and locations included in the book. She added that some
factors, such as there being as of yet no result from the Hrant Dink
murder case and some people still receiving death threats, underscore
just some of the problems that Armenians still face in this country.

Altınay, who noted that Dink was personally called into the governor’s
offices and threatened in the wake of his announcement that Sabiha
Gökcen was in fact an Armenian orphan, said that 2004 marked the
starting point of work on the important topic of Muslim Armenians.

Within this framework, Altınay noted that in the wake of Dink’s
murder, people throughout Turkey began to feel more and more
responsibility for this topic.

Altınay also spoke about allegations made by the former head of the
Turkish Historical Society (TTK), Yusuf Halacoglu, that some Kurdish
Alevis were in fact Armenians, noting that these are not realistic
assertions. She said that in talking to the descendants of Armenians
throughout Turkey, very few of them are in fact now Alevi Muslims and
that, in addition, very few actually converted back to Christianity
after discovering their true ethnic roots.

Noting that Turkey is now carrying on its shoulders a very heavy legacy
where this is all concerned, Altınay said: “There are currently very
many Muslim Armenians. While some deny their true identity, others
describe themselves as ethnically Armenian but Muslim. These are things
which completely overturn our entire perception of identities. We are
actually shouldering a very heavy legacy here. And the most important
thing here is to explain this legacy well. While listening to old
stories, we are hearing stories not only of pain and violence, but
also of vital interaction. In sharing this legacy, we are contributing
to the normalization of this entire period.”

Köletavitoglu, the founder of HAYDER, noted that his own ideas about
Muslim Armenians were formed when he went to find his grandmother’s
gravesite in Hekimhan, Malatya province, in 2001. It was only after
the local mayor had announced that one or two of the local villages
were actually Armenian originally and later, when an Armenian from
France did a study on the topic of Muslim Armenians in Turkey, that
Köletavitoglu decided to move into action and organize a conference
on the matter.

Köletavitoglu, who said that after HAYDER was formed, many people had
come to the organization wanting to share how their ethnic roots were
actually Armenian, noted: “These types of conferences and meetings
need to continue. We have made an important start with this one. When
everyone is able to talk openly about their roots, it will give people
great confidence.”

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-330578-another-taboo-finally-addressed-muslimized-armenians-of-turkey.html

Armenian Leader Accused Of Caving In To Moscow

ARMENIAN LEADER ACCUSED OF CAVING IN TO MOSCOW

Institute for War and Peace Reporting, UK
IWPR Caucasus Reporting #708
Nov 5 2013

Strong reactions to moves to bind Yerevan’s economic future to Moscow.

By Vahe Harutyunyan – Caucasus

As President Serzh Sargsyan insists Armenia’s entry into the Customs
Union will strengthen the country, his opponents are accusing him of
surrendering the nation’s independence.

On October 24, Sargsyan signed an agreement paving the way for
accession to the Customs Union, whose current members are Russia,
Belarus and Kazakstan. The terms include setting up a commission
to draw up a road map for the accession process, and banning any
“statements or actions that run contrary to the interests of the
Customs Union”.

Sargsyan announced plans to join the trade bloc after talks in Moscow
in early September, stunning both Armenians and European diplomats who
were awaiting the signing of an association agreement and trade deal
with the European Union. The two are seen as mutually exclusive. (See
Armenia’s Receding European Ambitions)

Moscow, which has been trying to prevent its former Soviet satellites
from moving closer to the EU scheme, had been putting pressure on
Yerevan to change course.

Sargsyan’s decision takes Armenia out of a group of four republics
– the others being Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova – which will sign
similar agreements with the EU in November.

The president said Armenia, which is already part of the Collective
Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO), a Russian-led defence pact,
had to take national security into account given its tense relations
with neighbours Turkey and Azerbaijan.

“Our colleagues in the CSTO are creating a new platform for economic
cooperation,” he said, in televised comments. “I have often said
that when you are part of a system that provides you with defence
security, it is impossible and ineffective to isolate yourself from
that geopolitical area.”

Russia guards much of Armenia’s border with Turkey, maintains a troop
presence in the country and supplies it with weapons on preferential
terms. Economically, Russia is a major trading partner and also hosts
hundreds of thousands of Armenian migrant workers.

These factors give it significant leverage, as Prime Minister
Tigran Sargsyan admitted in an interview with western journalists
in mid-October.

“If we don’t join the Customs Union, that will create new barriers
between businesses in Armenia and Russia. A political decision was
therefore taken that our country’s economic development must be
within the framework of the Customs Union,” Tigran Sargsyan said,
according to an account published on the government website.

Gagik Minasyan, head of the Armenian parliament’s finance committee and
a member of Sargsyan’s Republican Party, confirmed that the decision
had not been taken because of the potential economic benefits.

“Only when the documents are finally drawn up for Armenia to join
the Customs Union will it be possible to predict whether the impact
on the economy will be positive or negative,” he told IWPR.

Opposition politicians were in no doubt that the decision was
catastrophic.

Levon Ter-Petrosyan, Armenia’s first post-Soviet president and now
head of the opposition Armenian National Congress, said Sargsyan had
effectively surrendered control of foreign policy to Moscow.

Raffi Hovhannisian, a former foreign minister who heads the Heritage
Party, called in the president to step down, saying that the decision
showed he had no judgement.

“Sargsyan has turned himself into a [Russian] provincial governor, and
he must go,” the opposition politician said. “Following the notorious
anti-state protocols [failed attempt to improve ties with Turkey],
elections that are staged illegally and then stolen, his continuously
harmful policies, and now this unilateral decision announced in the
Kremlin… there is no other possible option.”

Ruben Mehrabyan, a political analyst with the Armenian Centre for
Political and International Studies, said that Sargsyan’s decision
looked unconstitutional. He even compared it to the Soviet Union’s
forcible annexation of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia in 1940.

“It resembles what happened to the Baltic states, only without
the army being involved. The process that began in September 3
and continued on October 24 looks like an occupation,” Mehrabyan
told IWPR. “The constitution explicitly prohibits Armenia from
undertaking any obligations that, in whole or in part, transfer
national sovereignty to any supranational structure. There are no
mechanisms in the constitution that allow us to change this. And if
it happens, it is nothing other than occupation.”

David Shahnazaryan, former head of Armenia’s National Security Service,
said he was certain Moscow was seeking to exert the control it once
had over Armenia.

“It’s clear that what we’re talking about is restoring the Soviet
Union, and that this is a deadly threat to the Republic of Armenia,”
he told IWPR.

The Armenian government is still insisting it will sign a document
of some kind in at the EU meeting Vilnius.

“I think we will sign a document with the European Union in Vilnius,”
Levon Sargsyan, the president’s brother who serves as a special envoy,
said at a press conference in mid-October. “It will become clear at
the summit what kind of document that will be.”

Vahe Harutyunyan is a freelance journalist in Armenia.

http://iwpr.net/report-news/armenian-leader-accused-caving-moscow

Turkey-Azerbaijan Relations Still Strong

TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN RELATIONS STILL STRONG

Al-Monitor
Nov 5 2013

Author:Tulin Daloglu
Posted November 4, 2013

When Turkey decided to launch an initiative to normalize its relations
with Armenia in May 2009, Azerbaijan perceived it as a betrayal by the
Turkish-Azeri alliance and their brotherly relations based on sharing
the same ethnic background. The Azeri officials still insist to this
day that Turkey did not inform them about that initiative in advance,
and that they learned it from the media like everyone else. That
caused a significant turmoil in Azeri confidence in Turkey. Ankara
was perceived as acting solely on its own national interests, trading
off the territories in mountainous Karabakh that have been occupied
by Armenia since 1991. And this perception of Turkey really struck
a sensitive nerve in the Azeri society.

Perhaps these two countries won’t ever trust each other as they did
prior to this incident, but, nevertheless, it has also become clear
that no crisis between Turkey and Azerbaijan can leave a permanent scar
in this pivotal relationship. Although the Turkey-Armenia normalization
efforts are long gone, technically speaking, Ankara did not actually
cause any harm to Azerbaijan in the end. What’s noteworthy is that
Azerbaijan started to pay more attention to balancing and improving its
relationships with its powerful neighbors like Russia and Iran. It’s
as if the Azeri government is trying to implement Turkish Foreign
Minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s failed attempt for Turkey’s “having zero
problems with neighbors” policy.

“Today, Azerbaijan’s initiatives in regional affairs are of great
importance not only for our country, but also for the region. Our
economic and political initiatives pursue one goal: first of all, to
enable the people of Azerbaijan to live even better,” Ilham Aliyev,
president of Azerbaijan, told a crowd of nearly 1,000 people last
week, Oct. 31, during the third Baku International Humanitarian
Conference. “On the other hand, we want to be in constant communication
with neighboring nations. The purpose of our regional initiatives is
to further strengthen our ties with neighboring countries. Today this
is the case. Azerbaijan has very sincere and constructive relations
with its neighbors. Our relations with all countries are based on a
very sound footing. These are relations of friendship and partnership,
equal relationships.”

Matt Bryza, the former US ambassador to Azerbaijan, however, argues
that they’re not really multitasking. “They have the opposite ambition
of Turkey,” he told Al-Monitor. “They’re extremely vulnerable to
outside intervention, and they’re trying to do the best they can to
save themselves from any problems.” He added: “Azerbaijan’s survival
as an independent and sovereign state is dependent on the pipelines
that physically and economically interconnect it to Turkey and the
Western world.”

Still though, Azerbaijan announced in October that it is considering
opening Hudaferin border gate to Iran. Even the thought of this would
not have been possible a few years ago. The reason is simple. Iran
has developed strong relations with Armenia in a way to side with the
Soviet Union and, today, Russia against the United States, and that
put it in an awkward position – religiously – as it stood against
the interests of Azerbaijan. Not that Iran had any direct role to
play in the Nagorno Karabagh conflict, but its posturing benefited the
Armenians on this issue. Azerbaijan, ethnically Turkish and religiously
from the Shiite school of Islam like Iran, chose to stay away from
the orbit of Russia after announcing their independence, and therefore
sided with Turkey and therefore the United States and NATO alliance.

The Aliyev government is certainly trying to do its best in keeping
its relationships manageable with all of its neighbors – even with
those like Iran, where half the population is of Azeri origin, and
which can not relieve itself from the fear that this Azeri population
will one day seek to establish a greater Azerbaijan, taking significant
chunks land away from them.

All that said, at the core of all of this outreach to its neighbors,
one would not be exaggerating to say that Azerbaijan is always
thinking about how it can help end Armenian occupation of its land
in Nagorno-Karabagh.

“We hope that the conflict will be resolved and Azerbaijan’s
territorial integrity recognized by the international community will
be restored in the near future. There is a strong legal basis for
that. There are four UN Security Council resolutions which explicitly
state that the Armenian armed forces should unconditionally withdraw
from the occupied Azerbaijani lands,” Aliyev said.

The sense in Baku is that the failure in following up on these
resolutions directly challenges the credibility of the United States
and United Nations. Moreover, Azeri authorities have no confidence
in the MINSK group, headed by a co-chairmanship consisting of
France, Russia and the United States, which is tasked to resolve
the Nagorno-Karabagh issue. The MINSK group also includes Belarus,
Germany, Italy, Portugal, the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Turkey,
Azerbaijan and Armenia.

Under these circumstances, it looks quite unlikely to expect Armenians
to end their occupation in Nagorno-Karabagh any time soon. On the
contrary, Azerbaijan warns against ethnic Armenian Syrians being
relocated to the occupied territories. Azernews reported in its Jan.

5, 2013, edition that Armenia continues its illegal activity of
attempting to artificially change the demographic situation in
Nagorno-Karabagh thus ignoring the international community’s position
which condemns such activities. “Recently, about 200 Armenian refugees
from Syria were settled in the occupied Zangilan region, which was
another clear evidence of the illegal settlement policy pursued by
the Armenian state,” the paper reported.

One would have hoped in fact that these war-torn Syrian refugees were
to be placed in a safer area – away from any potential conflict. But
the international community seems to also fail to warn Armenia on
this matter as well.

To sum up, the attempted effort to normalize relations between
Turkey and Armenia failed at no cost to relations between Turkey and
Azerbaijan, because Turkey remains the most reliable and safe route for
Azeris to export their oil and natural gas to international markets. In
that light, in addition to the Baku-Tiblisi-Ceyhan pipeline, Azerbaijan
started to prioritize its direct investment in Turkey. In September,
Turkish Energy and Natural Resources Minister Taner Yildiz announced
that Azerbaijan will make 17 billion lira investment in the economy
of Turkey for the construction of the Trans-Anatolian gas pipeline
project (TANAP) and implementation of other project. TANAP will
allow transporting gas from Azerbaijani Shah Deniz field to Europe
through Turkey – and this is the way for Azerbaijan to sustain its
independence and strengthen its sovereignty.

http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/11/azerbaijan-turkey-relations-russia.html

Iran, Armenia Agree On 3 Power Projects

IRAN, ARMENIA AGREE ON 3 POWER PROJECTS

Press TV, Iran
Nov 5 2013

File photo shows power transmission lines between Iran and its
neighbors.

Tue Nov 5, 2013 2:50PM GMT

Iranian Energy Minister Hamid Chitchian and his Armenian counterpart
have signed three agreements for the implementation of joint hydropower
projects.

The agreements were reached in Tehran on Tuesday as Chitchian and
Armenian Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisyan
met to discuss enhancement of mutual cooperation between the two
neighboring countries.

Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the meeting, Chitchian
pointed to the high level of cooperation between Iran and Armenia in
the electricity and energy sectors and noted that the new agreements
were related to bartering electricity for natural gas, construction
of a new hydroelectric power plant on the border river, Aras, and
further electricity exchanges between the two countries.

He noted that transit of Iran’s electricity to Russia was also
discussed in the meeting.

The Iranian minister stated that based on the existing agreements,
Iran’s electricity will be transmitted to Russia through Armenia,
Azerbaijan and Georgia.

Iran has bartered more than 1.5 billion cubic meters of gas with
Armenia’s electricity over the past six years.

The National Iranian Gas Company said recently that around 1.5 billion
cubic meters of natural gas has been traded with Armenian electricity
during the 2007-2012 period.

Last year, the Islamic Republic exchanged some 481 million cubic meters
of gas with the neighboring country’s electricity, the largest amount
of barter between Iran and Armenia in six years.

ASH/KA/

Jerusalem: Restoration Of Nativity Church Has Commenced

RESTORATION OF NATIVITY CHURCH HAS COMMENCED

Palestine News Network (PNN) – English
November 3, 2013 Sunday

By Mariam Nabil/ PNN Exclusive

The Nativity Church in Bethlehem is the birthplace of Jesus and
an important destination for millions of pilgrims, tourists and
worshipers. When entering this important historical and religious site,
tourists observe the wooden roof, the beautiful clerestory windows,
which are covered with mosaics depicting the ancestors of Jesus and
providing illumination for the church’s interior. A new project has
been set by the Palestinian government, with the help of European
countries, for the restoration of the Nativity church. This project
will be divided into four phases, expected to take one year of work.

The first phase will be the restoration of the church’s roof
and windows. Ziad Al-Bandak, President Mahmoud Abbas’ adviser for
Christian affairs, said that the Nativity church is one of the most
important churches for Christians in the world, and is part of the
Palestinians’ historical heritage. For centuries, there has been
significant interest in preserving this church due to the wars and
natural disasters that have weakened its structure. He also said that
this project is considered the first comprehensive restoration work for
the church since it was erected in the third century. Al-Bandak added
that the restoration of the roof is important because the church has a
problem of rainwater leakage from the roof and windows, affecting the
church’s walls and mosaics. He also said that an appeal was sent to
three churches: The Greek Orthodox Patriarchate, Armenians Orthodox
Patriarchate and the Custody of the Holy Land, as these churches
have full authority over the Nativity Church. The state of Palestine
has contributed 2 million dollars and the Palestinian private sector
contributed 750,000 dollars. Other countries also offered funds for the
project, including Hungary, Russia, Greece, The Vatican and France. The
project is expected to cost around 17 million Euros. Afif Tweimeh,
Project Manager for the Restoration of Nativity Church, said that
this project was first proposed as an international bid to get the
best offers for the restoration. About the project, Tweimeh said,
“In the first phase, we will first prevent damage from the leakage
and then other parts of the church will be restored throughout the
project.” He continued, “Some parts of the ceiling will be replaced and
other parts will be restored based on the design that was previously
outfitted by the Consultative Group, in cooperation with a partner
group in Italy.” The restoration work is being done at night when the
church is empty, in an attempt to avoid disrupting visitors and for
the sake of their safety. Issa Morra, Structural Engineer, said that
the first phase of the project, restoration of the roof and windows,
is the most important. According to Morra, the scaffoldings were
brought from Italy, for the safety of the workers.

He said, “Our biggest challenge will be completing the work in one
year, while ensuring that the church can continue to receive pilgrims,
tourists and worshipers without any obstacles.” He pointed out that
most of the material used for the restoration of the roof has been
imported from abroad, mostly from Italy, because they undergo certain
technical standards, and due to the fact that the wooden construction
materials are not available in Palestine. Italian Marccelo Piattini,
the Technical Manager of the project, said that the wood that was
used 500 years ago to construct the roof of the Nativity church was
brought from Italy, and, in his opinion, it is better to use the same
material from Italy for the roof’s current restoration. Italians and
Palestinians are working together on this project, he added. This
project is an important step taken by the Palestinian Authority,
in collaboration with European countries, to preserve one of the
most historical and religious sites in the world. Restoration of the
church’s windows and roof will be followed by work on the interior,
including the mosaics, columns, floor and walls. This project will
ensure that the Nativity Church will always have an open door for
worshipers, tourists and pilgrims from around the world.