Something Old, Something New

SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW

AZG
26-08-2011

As Armenia’s capital Yerevan takes its first steps towards privatising
key public services, May or Karen Karapetyan tells COURTNEY FINGAR of
his priorities for this ancient city, and his hopes for improvements
in relations with neighbouring countries

——————————————————————————–

Q.Yerevan is not that well known globally, nor is Armenia generally.

Do you think there is a knowledge gap about what the city has to
offer businesses and how do you intend to raise its profile?

A. It is true that Yerevan and Armenia are little known. But I am
positive that we have a lot to say. I don’t know whether you know
that Yerevan is 50 years older than Rome and Babylon. It is one thing
to say that Yerevan is 2794 years old and another to say that it is
a contemporary of such famous cities as Rome and Babylon. Moreover,
one of our districts, Shengavit, is more than 6000 years old. It is
one of the more extraordinary areas in this region.

Armenia itself is the first Christian state; Noah moored his arc to
Mount Ararat during the floods. I agree that we do not communicate
in the right ways and we are little heard of. So, what should we do
about it? We should use all possible information channels.

The streaming of information nowadays provides great opportunities.

Take the Armenian diaspora, for example. There are two and a half
times as many Armenians living outside the country. They have their
own friends, colleagues and, of course, information channels, be
they diplomatic, diasporan or internet. What the City Hall wants to
do about this issue is to boost the brand awareness of Yerevan. We
want to communicate a range of information, including our history,
business and investments. To do this we have created a new department
that will be responsible for this work. We will be using the services,
support and help of certain organisations to do all this.

It is a fact that if we are little heard of, we are little known
about. If we are little known about, then we are little trusted.

Everything stems from that.

Q. What do you feel are the city’s unique selling points as an
investment destination?

A. Taking into account the current situation, Yerevan is a very
profitable market to invest in. I would say it is a good time to
invest as it is such a fallow market. Which sectors are best to invest
in? Almost all sectors connected with municipal services. It is the
aim of the City Hall team to create the utmost open and fair business
environment. We want to give the sectors that have business logic to
private companies, or to create public-private partnerships. These
sectors include medicine, hotel business, public transport and waste
management.

Moreover, we are ready to pass the management of our state-owned
enterprises to potential investors and partners where there is also
business logic. For example, YerCityLight, City Funeral Bureau, the
underground and City Landscape Gardening planting services. We are
more than sure that this will bring a stream of investments, reduce
the risk of corruption, develop these sectors and produce savings in
our budget. Very often we spend the budget on these sectors not as
correctly or optimally as we should.

These cost savings will let us invest more into those sectors where
there is no business logic, for example, road building, landscape
gardening and the provision of urban amenities. We are currently
implementing this policy intensively. Our main task is to gain
investors’ trust so in the near future we can pass our companies over
to them.

The new department I mentioned earlier is called the Department of
City Development and Investment Projects Support. Its main task is
the creation of a transparent business environment. We are ready
to support our investors and assist them any time they encounter
artificial barriers to business development, whether from a state body,
a monopoly or whoever.

To sum up: in my opinion Yerevan today is really interesting for
businesses, especially foreign ones because the norms of profitability
are very different from those in more established countries. Municipal
management is different from business management because it is
difficult to prioritise. Kindergartens are a priority, road building
is a priority. The solution to one problem could come at the expense
of solving another one. All the problems require a solution now.

Q. What are its weaknesses and what your priority areas for improvement
to make the city more attractive for foreign investors?

A. The fact we are not trusted is our major weakness. This is due
to multiple factors, primarily a lack of awareness. Business is
an environment where money is invested when there is stability and
confidence in the deal.

So our first challenge is to make the world aware of us. Then we must
create the right business environment. We have publicly announced
that we intend to eradicate corruption in the City Hall. I think the
public is already receiving the right signals about the sincerity of
our intentions.

Gaining permits and other documents has been massively simplified. We
cut out a lot of bureaucracy to make City Hall work better. Next,
we have to create an atmosphere in which our team will be motivated
to work towards the same goal. This is the problem that we have to
solve first of all. If we do not, there is the risk that deals will
be done illegally. It is very important for us to know that we are
trusted and this trust should also involve recognition and openness. I
am more than positive that we will be successful in achieving this.

Q. The region in which Armenia sits is one that is underexploited in
terms of business development, trade volumes and foreign investment,
yet in many ways is fragmented culturally and economically. Do you
feel that regional integration is essential to Yerevan’s success,
and to what extent is closer integration possible or even desirable?

A. I consider regional co-operation to be both necessary and
desirable. In our region, there are four countries, two of which we
do not have any diplomatic relations with and this is not good. Our
regional leaders’ understanding of this necessity is not at the
appropriate level.

Are we doing everything to create an environment of regional
co-operation? I don’t think so. Nonetheless, I think that very often
we do much more than our neighbouring countries, but it’s not enough.

We all have to be consistent and should never tire of dealing with it.

Co-operation is essential in all spheres.

Armenia is a small country and its market is so small that producers
should focus not only on internal consumers, but also on external
ones in order to secure a critical mass of sales. In which fields
could there be co-operation? Various ones, such as energy or medicine.

In the field of medicine, we should regionally agree on creating
smaller specialised clinics rather than bigger ones with multiple
specialisations because the market is small.

When I negotiate with potential investors in the field of medicine,
I tell them that they shouldn’t think of Yerevan just as a city
with a population of 1.2 million, but they should also take into
account the neighbouring countries of Iran, Georgia and the south
of Russia. To tackle this issue, the governments, the municipalities
and the businesses need to have the courage to start negotiations.

Before I became the mayor, I headed the gas company of Armenia and
before that the electrical networks company and we were determined
to start trade with Turkey and even with Azerbaijan. I hope you
know about the political problems with our neighbours. They seem to
have more complexes and to be more closed than us in trying to solve
this problem.

Does this mean that we should feel disappointed and discontinue the
attempts? Of course not. Does this mean that we should do it at the
expense of our dignity?

Of course not. It is God’s will for neighbours to live in friendship
and to reach a compromise. One cannot avoid it, one does not choose
neighbours. We need to find an acceptable way of communicating.

Conference In Tsakhkadzor To Focus On Funding In Science

CONFERENCE IN TSAKHKADZOR TO FOCUS ON FUNDING IN SCIENCE

Tert.am
25.08.11

Armenia’s resort town of Tsakhkadzor will from August 26-28 host a
conference that will focus on possibilities of increasing funding in
science and ways of diversifying financial recourses.

The conference is organized by the Youth Foundation of Armenia and
the Association of the Graduates of US universities.

The conference aims at bring together young and elder scientists,
to exchange views, present thematic lectures in an attempt to find
ways of increasing financing in the sphere of science, as well as to
contribute to the creation of necessary conditions to diversify the
sources of funding.

The conference will be attended by scientists of both young and
elder generation.

Armenia’s Minsiter of Education and Science, Armen Ashotyan, as well
as representatives of agencies in chare will deliver speeches.

Why They Recalled Kocharyan

WHY THEY RECALLED KOCHARYAN
HAKOB BADALYAN

Lragir.am

25/08/2011

Though with a weaker public focus, WikiLeaks, nevertheless, continues
to reveal interesting details of the internal correspondence of the
American diplomacy.

In particular, WikiLeaks has revealed the letter of the second
president of Armenia, Robert Kocharyan, to the Turkish prime minister,
Erdoghan, which was Kocharyan’s reply to Erdogan’s letter. This
correspondence was dated to Kocharyan’s office. Turkey proposed
consideration of the genocide by the commission of historians and
Kocharyan refused. Instead, the Armenian side proposed discussion
of any issue at an intergovernmental level. “An intergovernmental
commission can meet to discuss any and all outstanding issues between
our two nations, with the aim of resolving them and coming to an
understanding,” Kocharyan wrote to Erdogan.

It is not news, of course. So it is hard to say why this story is
refreshed through WikiLeaks. Maybe it is a message to Turkey which
has recently withdrawn from the agenda of its parliament the Zurich
protocols. It may thereby hint to Turkey that should they fail
to return the protocols on the agenda, Armenia’s position might
“come back”.

The point is that these protocols note the subcommittee of historians.

In other words, what Robert Kocharyan had refused was accepted by
Serzh Sargsyan. It’s a reminder of Kocharyan, perhaps hinting that
Serzh Sargsyan may return to Kocharyan’s position in case Turkey
fails to maintain the process.

Here the question of the Armenian position rises. Robert Kocharyan
criticized Serzh Sargsyan’s position on the Armenian-Turkish
normalization. But apparently some clarification is, nevertheless,
required: is Kocharyan against consideration of the genocide or is he
against consideration by historians? Judging by his reply to Erdogan’s
letter, he is not against discussion but he agrees to consideration
at an intergovernmental level, in other words, officially and actually
legally. The difference is obvious, with ensuing political “effect”.

Only the question occurs what the Armenian side expected to focus on in
the consideration of the genocide during Kocharyan’s office. Would they
consider if the genocide happened or not, what Turks propose or demand,
or would they consider recognition, as well as ensuing contribution.

Notably, Kocharyan had told in an interview with the Turkish journalist
that Armenia has no claims to Turkey. According to Kocharyan, the
Diaspora, Turkish citizens who suffered during the genocide and their
successors, may have similar claims.

If Armenia has no legal claims to Turkey, what should it discuss with
Turkey? If there is discussion, if there is a proposal of discussion,
Armenia should announce its claims to Turkey. Otherwise, a logical
controversy occurs because if Armenia has reason to consider the
genocide with Turkey at an intergovernmental level, it means Armenia
has reason for claims. And it would be ingenuous to think that
Turks are not aware of this. Consequently, they will never agree to
discussion at an intergovernmental level, as it is a trap. But it does
not mean that the Armenians should agree to discuss the question at the
level of historians because this time Armenia and the Armenians would
be trapped. Meanwhile, the point of the Armenian-Turkish protocols
which concerns the subcommittee of historians is a step toward this
trap which Armenia has taken.

The Armenian side must work out the possibility to discuss the issue
of the genocide. Can it be discussed at an intergovernmental or
historical or social level or this issue cannot be discussed at all?

Logically, consideration of this issue should be unacceptable for the
Armenian side. Meanwhile, the ways and timetable of its resolution
and possible consequences could be considered. Consequently,
whenever a proposal on consideration is made or a proposal needs to
be responded, the Armenian side must understand its agenda and focus
of the discussion to prevent further diplomatic speculations and to
avoid theoretical or practical traps.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments23086.html

Suren Zolyan: NKR Recognition Issue Must Always Be In Armenia’s Poli

SUREN ZOLYAN: NKR RECOGNITION ISSUE MUST ALWAYS BE IN ARMENIA’S POLITICAL AGENDA

ARMENPRESS
August 25, 2011
YEREVAN

The issue on recognition of Nagorno Karabakh Republic must always be
in Armenia’s political agenda, political specialist Suren Zolyan said
today at a meeting with journalists, adding that perhaps this is not
a convenient moment: it must be done in a corresponding atmosphere.

“If the Azerbaijani position is not changed in the negotiation process
of the conflict, then Armenia must suspend its participation in the
negotiation issue and refer to NKR recognition issue,” the political
specialist said.

According to him, Azerbaijan hoped that it will get the support of
international community on the way of NK conflict settlement, but
seeing that three is not such a thing it expresses his disappointment
over co-chair countries of OSCE Minsk Group.

WikiLeaks: Armenia Will Not Support Iran On UN Human Rights Council

WIKILEAKS: ARMENIA WILL NOT SUPPORT IRAN ON UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

Tert.am
25.08.11

In May 2006 Armenia’s ex-foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan took a final
decision not to support Iran’s bid for a seat in the UN human rights
council, according to a recently leaked WikiLeaks cable/

“On May 6, Deputy Foreign Minister Armen Baiburtian phoned DCM to
inform that Minister Oskanian had taken the final GOAM decision
not/not to support Iran’s bid for a seat on the new UN Human Rights
Council. Baiburtian said that Oskanian’s decision, taken after his
return from a conference in Vilnius, was influenced by the Secretary’s
letter,” reads the cable.

Karabakh Resolves Its Problems Independently – Expert

KARABAKH RESOLVES ITS PROBLEMS INDEPENDENTLY – EXPERT

Tert.am
25.08.11

Unlike other countries in the South Caucasus region, Nagorno Karabakh
has always resolved its problems independently, according to political
analyst Suren Zolyan, the rector of the Yerevan State Linguistic
University.

“Azerbaijan used to rely on the [foreign] powers benefiting from its
natural gas and oil but Karabakh’s economic and military development
dashed its expectations,” he told a news conference on Thursday.

“Unlike Georgia and Azerbaijan where political crises are overcome
with the world community’s mediation, Karabakh resolves its problems
independently,” he added.

The expert noted in the meantime that a population increase in Artsakh
could be of a factor in the conflict settlement process. Further
he stressed the importance of elaborating strategic programs and
developing infrastructures.

“Karabakh cannot develop without Armenia. The stronger Armenia,
the stronger Karabakh,” he said, adding that Azerbaijan’s builds its
plans based on the indexes of Armenia’s economic downfall.

Bryusov Rector Views Government-Opposition Dialog As A Big Waste

BRYUSOV RECTOR VIEWS GOVERNMENT-OPPOSITION DIALOG AS A BIG WASTE
Mаry Mamyan

hetq
August 25, 2011

Souren Zolyan, Rector of the Valery Bryusov University of Linguistics,
stated today that he couldn’t take the ongoing dialog between the
government and opposition HAK (Armenian National Congress) seriously
because the two sides essentially have nothing to negotiate about.

“One of the sides knows that it’s demand for snap elections isn’t
acceptable to the other, but the talks continue,” Zolyan said,
adding that under such conditions such meetings really should only
last five minutes.

The analyst said that there were many more substantial issues that
could be discussed.

Turning to the Karabakh conflict, Zolyan argues that the issue remains
unresolved since the parties involved, including outside mediators,
aren’t really interested in resolving it.

Zolyan said that Artsakh could only be transformed into a strong
state when Armenia’s economy improved.

He said it was senseless to wait for the proposals made by the
international community. Rather, our focus should be on developing
Armenia’s sagging economy.

Regarding the international recognition of Artsakh, Zolyan said that
Armenia must take the lead and press the issue from a political and
legal standpoint.

MP Samvel Aleksanyan: Armenia’s Sugar Baron Sets The Price

MP SAMVEL ALEKSANYAN: ARMENIA’S SUGAR BARON SETS THE PRICE
Grisha Balasanyan

hetq
August 23, 2011

Price hikes in sugar are the latest to put a dent in the pocketbook
of the Armenian consumer.

In many Armavir villages, the price for a kilo of sugar has risen
from 400 AMD just two days ago to 470 AMD today. In Yerevan, prices
fluctuate between 420 – 450 AMD.

MP Samvel Aleksanyan owns Aleks Grig, a network of companies that has
a near total monopoly on sugar imports to Armenia, controlling 99%
of the domestic market.

In essence, he’s the one who sets the price for sugar in Armenia

In a conversation with Hetq, Aleksanyan explained that a contract the
company had with Brazilian suppliers for the importation of inexpensive
sugar had expired and that new, more inexpensive prices had kicked in.

MP Aleksanyan also said that the company only imports unprocessed
sugar and that the raw material is taken to the Akhurian Sugar Plant
for processing.

He said that prices wouldn’t rise until a new stocks of sugar were
imported in 3-4 months.

According to figures from the State Revenue Committee, Armenia imported
97,700 tons of sugar last year, up from 64,800 tons in 2009.

The Akhurian plant produced 45,000 tons of processed sugar last year.

Highway To Tsitsernakaberd Memorial To Be Renovated By Sept 1

HIGHWAY TO TSITSERNAKABERD MEMORIAL TO BE RENOVATED BY SEPT 1

Tert.am
24.08.11

The highway to Yerevan’s Tsitsernakaberd Memorial (Genocide Memorial)
will be renovated, and a new underground passage will be built by
September 1.

According to the Municipality’s Public Relations Department, active
construction work is now underway.

Mayor Karen Karapetyan visited the construction site on Tuesday. He
proposed increasing the workforce and split working hours into three
shifts. Construction workers said, however, that the trafficable
section of the highway will be completed earlier than scheduled.

The highway will not have traffic lights and is expected to clean
heavy traffic areas.

Des Deputes Francais En Visite " De Solidarite " Au Karabakh

DES DEPUTES FRANCAIS EN VISITE ” DE SOLIDARITE ” AU KARABAKH
Stephane

armenews.com
mercredi 24 aout 2011
KARABAGH

Quatre parlementaires francais ont visite le Nagorno-Karabakh dans
le cadre d’une visite de soutien a la reconnaissance internationale
de sa secession de l’Azerbaïdjan.

La delegation menee par Guy Teissier, le president de la commission de
la Defense nationale a l’Assemblee nationale francaise, a rencontre
des parlementaires locaux et a eu des pourparlers separees avec Bako
Sahakian, le president de la Republique du Nagorno-Karabakh (NKR).

” Venir en Armenie est un geste d’amitie. Arriver au Karabakh est un
geste de solidarite ” a dit Guy Teissier dans un discours au Parlement
du NKR.

Le Depute francais de l’UMP a tenu a preciser que le Karabakh avait
ete incorpore dans l’Azerbaïdjan Sovietique ” a la suite d’un caprice
d’un dictateur ” et que sa population armenienne doit etre capable
de determiner son statut.

” Pourquoi resterions-nous silencieux et ne pas dire que les gens très
profondement enracines a cette terre ont le droit de vivre ici ? ”
a ajoute Guy Teissier.

Jacques Remeunier, un autre depute de l’UMP et maire de la ville
francaise de Vienne, a aussi exprime sa ” grande sympathie “” pour
la cause du Karabakh armenien.

” De meme que d’autres nations comme le Kosovo et Chypre, où tous les
deux ont un gouvernement, ils [les armeniens Karabakh] ont le droit
decident de leur destin ” a dit Jacques Remeunier.

Les legislateurs francais ont prevus de visiter plusieurs villages
et de rencontrer des responsables d’ONG representants des refugies
armeniens d’Azerbaïdjan.

Guy Teissier a defendu la visite. ” Est-ce que nous, peuple libre
d’un libre pays, n’avons pas le droit de venir librement visiter ici
et de voir nos amis ? ” a-t-il dit.