LOGGING: THE THIN LINE BETWEEN BUSINESS AND ORGANIZED CRIME
Edik Baghdasaryan
July 18, 2012
Trucks with no license plates. Loggers not carrying permits, as
required by law. The buzz of chainsaws despite the fog and light
rain. Lori, one of the most heavily forested regions in Armenia,
is rife with illegal logging.
Even on Sept. 21, 2011, a quiet day when Armenia celebrates its
independence, a team of reporters was able to watch trees being felled
and transported away without surveillance by the Jiliza Forestry Branch
of Hayantar, a state organization charged with protecting forests.
The only sight of a forest warden happened in the town of Alaverdi,
where the reporters parked their car earlier that day. Upon the
reporters’ return, they were surprised to find warden Henrik Mosinyan
next to their vehicle waiting for them.
He offered to talk and they arranged an interview for the next day.
Together with Mosinyan and Aram Baroyan, director of the Jiliza Forest
Branch, the reporters visited the spot where the logging had happened.
This time there was no rain, and no chainsaw buzz. Baroyan said the
logging the reporters had witnessed was legal and that it had been
allowed because larger trees were preventing the growth of smaller
ones.
Around him, the remains of smaller trees smashed when the large trees
were chopped down the day before seemed to belie his explanation.
Asked to show the permits, he said he didn’t have them handy. “I
can show them to you later,” he offered, but the documents were
never disclosed.
Asked why unlicensed trucks were allowed to carry away wood, he said
he is “not responsible” for the trucks. He did say “it’s out of the
question” that any trees could be transported out of that forest
without his knowledge.
Illegal logging, whether carried out entirely without a permit or in
quantities larger than those allowed, is periodically covered by the
Armenian press, but also periodically denied by Hayantar, the agency
attached to the Ministry of Agriculture.
Business or Organized Crime?
Hayantar’s duties not only include conservation but also harvesting
timber, processing it at lumber mills and selling it at lumberyards or
exporting it. This dual role is also seen in some Hayantar employees,
who are involved in the lumber business.
Kamo Shahnazaryan, director of the Lalvar Forestry Branch, owns Karast
Ltd., his own private lumber mill and lumber business.
Police investigations revealed in 2011 a number of abuses allegedly
carried out by Karast Ltd., after the company was hired by the mining
firm Teghut Ltd. to clear away the forest for the start of a mine.
About 5.6 million Armenian Dram (US$14,000) worth of felled trees
disappeared.
Members of the army, military police and local councils are frequently
among those who own sawmills.
Transporting illegally obtained wood, usually in covered vehicles,
is not too difficult. A driver of a truck selling wood in Yerevan
confessed, on condition of anonymity, that he buys a permit to log
30 cubic meters of wood from the forestry enterprise and uses it to
log twice and sometimes three times as much.
“If it is 7,200 AMD (US$19) with a permit, we pay 5,000 AMD (US$13)
up front to the warden for a cubic meter of fuel wood. I pay another
4,000 AMD (US$11) to the woodcutters. On average, I spend 10,000 AMD
(US$27) for every cubic meter of wood from the forest,” he said.
“Here in Yerevan I sell a cubic meter for 16,000 AMD (US$43). In a
word, it’s pretty good.”
The driver added he also pays another 20,000 (US$53) to bribe the
highway police.
During a discussion in the “Stable Forestry Regulation” seminar in
2011, Gagik Amiryan, Chief Forestry Warden at the Gougark Forestry
Enterprise, said, “This is not a forestry business, but an organized
crime.”
A 2011 study by the International Union for Conservation of Nature
(IUCN) and the International Center for Agribusiness Research and
Education (ICARE) about the impact of illegal logging, found evidence
that permits granted by Hayantar are routinely abused for multiple
loggings.
It also determined that gaining entry to the forest has become easier
and that there are significantly more loggers than in 2003.
Widespread small-level logging also seems to be on the rise. Eighty
percent of Armenia’s population heats their homes with natural gas,
but residents in rural areas say that for the monthly price of
heating their homes with gas – about 30,000 AMD (US$80) -they can
bribe the local forestry warden and cut wood to heat their homes for
an entire winter.
Additionally, with the global economic crisis, the population
officially labeled as “poor” in Armenia reached 37 percent, and as
a result, more people are using wood as fuel.
Old, unreliable statistics
Environmental organizations say that illegal tree logging is
increasing, but Hayantar says the opposite.
If official statistics are to be believed, the number of logged trees
in recent years has decreased dramatically from more than 32,000 in
2004 to less than 3,000 in 2010, and forested areas continue to cover
334,000 hectares (11.2 percent of the Armenian territory), as it was
in 1991.
But Hayantar hasn’t conducted a new inventory of Armenia’s forests, and
photos taken by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) show forested areas were only about 8 percent of the territory
in 2001. “Analyzing the NASA images, some 48,000 hectares were
destroyed just in the 1990s,” said Karine Danielyan, head of the
Association for Sustainable Human Development.
Hovik Sayadyan, a lecturer at the Armenian State Agrarian University’s
Department of Forestry and Agro-Ecology, says that even official
documentation renders Hayantar’s statistics not credible.
According to him, these figures have been deemed dubious by studies
like the National Forest Project adopted in 2005.
This year’s ICARE research report found that, “It is evident that
official statistics under-represent the figures by a factor of 80.”
While Hayantar insists that around 75,000 cubic meters of timber are
logged yearly, independent studies suggest much higher numbers.
A 2009 survey by the non-governmental organization the Greens’
Union of Armenia (GUA) interviewed household members in communities
adjacent to forested lands about the amount of wood used for fuel
in the course of a year. “Our calculations indicate that between 1
(million) and 1.3 million cubic meters of wood is logged every year,”
said Hakob Sanasaryan, GUA chairman.
A similar study by EcoLur, an environmental non-governmental
organization, suggests that approximately 700,000 cubic meters of
forest are cut down annually in the country, said EcoLur’s president,
Inga Zarafyan.
In response, Hayantar’s director, Martun Matevosyan, said, “While
qualitative changes to the forest have occurred, the overall amount
of forested areas is the same today as in 1988.”
‘Fed Up’ With Corruption
[jiliza.jpg]
As long as the government refuses to revise and update its data about
forestry areas, the lack of solid information will hinder any real
opportunity for accountability in the timber business. The lack of
legitimate data is also a reflection of little transparency in Armenia.
In April 2011, the Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC) in Yerevan
presented its 2010 “Armenia Corruption: Survey of Households,” showing
that over 80 percent of Armenian citizens believe that corruption
is a serious problem. That is 10 percent higher than the prior year,
said CRRC Director Heghine Manasyan.
According to Transparency International’s 2011 Corruption Perception
Index, Armenia ranked 129th (unchanged from 2010) out of the 183
countries assessed, with a 2.6 score. The score indicates the
perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 to 10,
where 0 means a country is perceived as highly corrupt.
When it comes to corruption perceptions, the government also plays
down the numbers. In November 2011, Georgi Kutoyan, chairman of
the Anti-Corruption Strategy Monitoring Committee and an adviser
to the president of the Republic of Armenia, presented a report
about implementation issues with the functions of the monitoring
commission. After the Anti-Corruption Council discussed the
information, the official statement said, “There was a reduction in
corruption risks in the above-mentioned time period as compared to
2008 and 2009.”
Asked why there are no improvements on corruption regarding the
perception of citizens and civil society organizations, Armenian
Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan said, “There is the real state of
corruption, and there is the perception of corruption. For two years,
we have banned 18 investigative bodies from conducting inspections in
around 50,000 enterprises. Naturally, this has led to a sharp drop
in corruption and all the studies show that corruption risks have
actually decreased.”
The Armenian public is “fed up with corruption,” he added. “This
means that we have serious work to do in bringing corruption levels
down and in portraying the true picture to the public.”
Transparency International’s Varuzhan Hoktanyan offered a couple of
suggestions for battling corruption and corruption perceptions.
“Without measures like the separation of the business and political
spheres and the decrease of monopolies it’s quite unlikely that the
perception will improve,” Hoktanyan said. “It is even possible to
cut the level of corruption without arrests, if that separation is
achieved or if other steps are taken to put an end to the monopolies.”
* Edik Baghdasaryan is the founder and head of Investigative
Journalists of Armenia and editor in-chief of the newspaper Hetq. A
lecturer at Yerevan State University, Baghdasaryan has received a
number of local and international awards. In 2010 he won the Gerd
Bucerius “Free Press of Eastern Europe” Award, and in 2011 he received
the 2011 Media Freedom Prize in Armenia.
Home page
http://hetq.am/eng/articles/17338/logging-the-thin-line-between-business-and-organized-crime.html
http://www.globalintegrity.org/report/Armenia/2011/notebook