Agreement Reached On Deployment Of Peacekeepers In Karabakh – Azerba

AGREEMENT REACHED ON DEPLOYMENT OF PEACEKEEPERS IN KARABAKH – AZERBAIJANI MFA

news.am
June 7 2011
Armenia

An agreement on deployment of peacekeeping forces in Nagorno-Karabakh
has been reached.

Under the agreement forces will involve peacekeepers from regional
states, not co-chairing countries, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov told journalists on Tuesday.

He noted that the issue requires additional discussion. Mammadyarov
said deployment of peacekeepers was included in the basic principles
for resolution of the conflict.

“The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict must be resolved stage-by-stage and
all stages are interrelated.

The basic principles for the conflict settlement were determined
at the G8 meeting in Canada. First of all, the Armenian troops must
be withdrawn from the occupied territories. All communications and
roads must be opened. Then, the earlier occupied territories must
be restored. The internally displaced people must return to their
native land. The peacekeeping forces must be deployed,” Azerbaijani
Trend agency quotes Elmar Mammadyarov.

Karabakh Mediators Brought No Proposals – Azerbaijani MFA

KARABAKH MEDIATORS BROUGHT NO PROPOSALS – AZERBAIJANI MFA

news.am
June 7 2011
Armenia

The OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs did not make new proposals on resolution
of the Karabakh conflict during their visit to Baku, said Azerbaijani
Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov.

“The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs didn’t make new proposals. They
discuss previous proposals during this visit,” APA news agency quotes
Mammadyarov.

The international mediators on Karabakh are on a visit to the region.

A regular monitoring in the line of contact between the armed forced
of Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh will take place on Tuesday.

The Foreign Ministers of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia will meet in
Moscow on June 11.

The meeting between Armenian, Russian and Azerbaijani Presidents in
Kazan is scheduled for late June.

Le Ministre Turc De La Culture Critique Le Monument Dedie A La Recon

LE MINISTRE TURC DE LA CULTURE CRITIQUE LE MONUMENT DEDIE A LA RECONCILIATION ARMENO-TURQUE
Stephane

armenews.com
mercredi 8 juin 2011

Le ministre turc de la Culture et du Tourisme Ertugrul Gunay a accuse
ceux qui s’opposent a la demolition du Monument de l’Humanite de Kars,
d’avoir en politisant la question, mene a la destruction de la statue.

” Ceux qui essayaient censement de proteger le monument ont cree
un desordre dans le processus plutôt que de calmer les choses ”
a dit Gunay au journa Hurriyet tout en exprimant ses regrets pour
la destruction de la sculpture geante. ” Les arguments chauvins ”
des residants locaux et la politisation de l’incident ont joue un
rôle important dans la conclusion de cette affaire a-t-il dit.

Andrzej Kasprzyk: Nothing Is Being Done Without Karabakh’s Knowledge

ANDRZEJ KASPRZYK: NOTHING IS BEING DONE WITHOUT KARABAKH’S KNOWLEDGE

armradio.am
07.06.2011 18:14

“First of all, it’s necessary to decrease the threat of war,” Personal
Representative of the OSCE chairman-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk said
in an interview with the Polish “Nowa Europa Wschodnia” (New Eastern
Europe), commenting on the situation in the Karabakh conflict zone.

Having participated in the peace talks for ten years, Kasprzyk says
the parties are closer to solving the issue today.

Before signing the final treaty, there is the question of the interim
status of Nagorno Karabakh. The special status cannot considerably
differ from the current status of Nagorno Karabakh, he said.

Speaking about concessions, Kasprzyk said after the signing of a
framework agreement it will be necessary to negotiate the details.

“There are still a number of unsolved issues. For, example, when we
are speaking about the corridor linking Armenia to Nagorno Karabakh,
it’s clear that it should remain. Azerbaijan officially agrees to
this. However, it’s necessary to come to an agreement on the details,
i.e. the width of the corridor or who should control it before the
peace deal is concluded.”

According to Andrzej Kasprzyk, the conduct of a referendum is another
problem. “Armenians see it as a simple voting with the participation
of the population of Nagorno Karabakh as it was during the census
of 1989. Baku insists, in turn, that it should be held all over the
territory of Azerbaijan.

“The Karabakh conflict is not frozen. What is frozen is its
settlement. According to my assessment, 36 people have died on both
sides over the past year. I interfered in the situation several times,
when the exchange of fire could grow into large-scale confrontation.

Then I called Washington, Paris and Moscow to try to stop it together,”
Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office stated.

Speaking about the role of Moscow, Kasprzyk said Russia aims to
relieve the tension. “The whole Caucasus is mined today, the outburst
of the Karabakh conflict would further destabilize the situation in
the North Caucasus, he noted.

“Russians are doing business in both Armenia and Azerbaijan. Thus
they are trying to escape the hostility of any of the countries. The
black-and-white idea that Russia supports Armenians, while Turkey
backs Azerbaijan is too primitive,” the diplomat stated.

According to Kasprzyk, nothing is being done without the consent
of Stepanakert. “They are always well-informed, their position is
being taken into consideration. When it comes to concrete results,
they should be accepted by Karabakh.”

Gevorg Gevorgyan: Different Countries Interested In Armenian Cinema

GEVORG GEVORGYAN: DIFFERENT COUNTRIES INTERESTED IN ARMENIAN CINEMA
Sona Hakobyan

“Radiolur”
08.06.2011 15:47

The Armenian National Cinema Center has been participating in the
Cannes Film Market for the third time in a row. This time the Cinema
Center had prepared special post cards for every film, which allowed
spectators to establish contacts with its authors.

Director of the National Cinema Center Gevorg Gevorgyan, many countries
are already interested in our films. As a result, agreements on
cooperation an international distribution were signed for the first
time in the history of Armenian cinematography.

Emphasizing the importance of the Cannes Film Market for countries with
small film budget like Armenia, Gevorg Gevorgyan noted: “The signing
of agreements with different countries is not the main function of
the Cinema center. Our task is to create favorable conditions of
cooperation with different organizations of the world.”

The Armenian delegation at the Cannes Film Market comprised director
Aram Shahbazyan, producers Hovhannes Galstyan and Aram Sukiasyan,
as well as Vrezh Kasuni, Director of the Reanimania international
festival of animation films.

Turquie : Un Nouveau Suspect Dans L’affaire Dink

TURQUIE : UN NOUVEAU SUSPECT DANS L’AFFAIRE DINK

Source/Lien : Bianet
Publié le : 08-06-2011

Info Collectif VAN – – ” Ã~@ l’audience
du lundi 30 mai, quatre ans et demi après le début du procès,
la 14ème Haute Cour criminelle d’Istanbul a décidé d’enquêter
sur une autre personne impliquée dans le meurtre du journaliste
arménien de Turquie Hrant Dink. Depuis le début du procès en 2007,
il y a des allégations indiquant qu’au moins une autre personne, en
plus du meurtrier présumé Ogun Samast, aurait été impliquée. Le
procès a été reporté au 29 juillet. ” Le Collectif VAN vous
propose la traduction d’un article du site progressiste turc Bianet,
en date 31 mai 2011.

4 ans plus tard : la Cour pense a un suspect supplémentaire

La Cour a finalement décidé d’enquêter sur une autre personne
impliquée dans le meurtre du journaliste turco-arménien Dink. Osman
Hayal sera mis en examen. Les données du téléphone portable ont
été exigées du TIB et de trois opérateurs GSM. Le procès a été
reporté au 29 juillet.

Ã~@ l’audience du lundi 30 mai, quatre ans et demi après le début
du procès, la 14ème Haute Cour criminelle d’Istanbul a décidé
d’enquêter sur une autre personne impliquée dans le meurtre du
journaliste turco-arménien Hrant Dink. Depuis le début du procès en
2007, il y a des allégations indiquant qu’au moins une autre personne,
en plus du meurtrier présumé Ogun Samast, aurait été impliquée.

Hrant Dink, un journaliste d’origine arménienne et fondateur du
journal arménien Agos, a été abattu par balle près de son bureau
dans le centre ville d’Istanbul le 19 janvier 2007.

Conformément a la requête de l’avocate Fethiye Cetin, l’un des
avocats de la famille Dink, la Cour a décidé de faire faire des
photos en pied, de face et de profil, d’Osman Hayal, ainsi que des
photographies biométriques. Hayal est le frère du suspect Yasin
Hayal qui aurait été aux alentours de la scène du crime le 19
janvier 2007.

Osman Hayal avait été précédemment arrêté et plus tard
relâché. La Cour était d’avis qu’il n’y avait aucun besoin “pour le
moment” d’arrêter de nouveau Hayal pour les mêmes allégations. Une
fois que les photographies seront prêtes, un expert déterminera si
la personne sur les enregistrements vidéo est Osman Hayal ou non. La
requête d’arrestation de Hayal sera évaluée en conséquence.

De plus, l’identité d’un suspect qui a parlé via un téléphone
portable de deux endroits différents près de la scène du crime,
le jour du meurtre, sera déterminée. La Cour a demandé a la
Présidence de la Communication et des Télécommunications (TIB)
et a trois opérateurs GSM différents, toutes les conversations
téléphoniques de cette personne, passées entre 11h10 et 11h25 et
entre 2h45 et 3h00 sur la scène de crime.

La Cour a rejeté la demande de libération de l’instigateur présumé
Yasin Hayal et de l’informateur de la police Erhan Tucel. Le procès
a été reporté au 29 juillet.

Suite a une requête précédente des avocats de la famille de
Dink, il a été demandé au Conseil de la recherche scientifique
et technologique de Turquie (TUBITAK) la séquence de la caméra de
surveillance installée a la succursale Akbank, puisque le meurtre
est survenu juste devant la banque. On avait demandé a TUBITAK si
les enregistrements avaient été supprimés et s’il serait possible
de les reconstituer. Le Conseil avait initialement répondu qu’il
n’avait aucun enregistrement.

On a demandé a TUBITAK de passer en revue les données, mais la
nouvelle analyse numérique est arrivée au même résultat. Selon
le rapport, la séquence a été effacée et ne peut pas être
reconstituée.

Les Amis de Hrant

En outre, avant la 18ème audience du procès, environ 300 “Amis de
Hrant” se sont rassemblés a Besiktas (Istanbul) et ont réitéré
leur demande de justice lors d’une une marche en direction du Tribunal
de Besiktas.

Le groupe a appelé a poursuivre en justice Muammer Guler, l’ancien
chef de la police d’Istanbul et Cemil Cicek, l’ancien porte-parole
gouvernemental et Vice-premier ministre actuel. On pouvait lire sur les
bannières portées par les membres de groupe : “Nous n’oublierons
pas”, “Pour Hrant, pour la Justice” ou “Les fascistes frappent,
l’AKP protège.” (EO/NV/VK)

©Traduction de l’anglais C.Gardon pour le Collectif VAN – 3 juin
2011 – 07:10 –

Retour a la rubrique

www.collectifvan.org
www.collectifvan.org

PM Tigran Sargsyan To Pay A Working Visit To Vienna

PM TIGRAN SARGSYAN TO PAY A WORKING VISIT TO VIENNA

armradio.am
07.06.2011 10:56

The delegation headed by Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan is leaving
for Vienna today to participate in the meeting of the World Economic
Forum on Europe and Central Asia.

On the first day of the visit the Armenian Prime Minister will
participate in the reception organized by the President of Austria
and the working dinner.

On June 8 Tigran Sargsyan will participate in the plenary sitting
of the World Economic Forum on Europe and Central Asia. He will have
meetings with the Prime Ministers of Austria, Ukraine and Hungary.

The Armenian Prime Minister will visit the headquarters of the OPEC
Fund for International Development, where he will meet OFID Director
General Suleiman Jasir Al-Herbish.

The Armenian government delegation will return to Yerevan on June 9.

L’Armenie De Toujours: Fidele Au Poste

L’ARMENIE DE TOUJOURS: FIDELE AU POSTE

La Croix
Mardi 31 Mai 2011
France

AUTEUR: LE PRIOL Pierre-Yves

L’Armenie fete les vingt ans de son independance et pour qui aime
ce peuple, bien connu en France avec sa diaspora, un voyage par
procuration etait propose dimanche matin, sur France 5 (“Echappees
belles”). L’emission faisait elle-meme suite a une autre, diffusee
recemment (“Armenie a la croisee des chemins”), et bien des similitudes
ne manquaient pas de frapper entre les deux.

Car il existe des thematiques recurrentes dans tout reportage consacre
a ce pays : le lac Sevan, la vue sur le mont Ararat, le catholicossat
de Etchmiadzine. À Erevan, ne pas rater le musee du Matenadaran, si
riche en manuscrits anciens, et puis le monument en memoire du genocide
de 1915. Immanquablement, le commentaire evoque ” l’histoire tourmentee
” de ce peuple, son ” heritage millenaire ” . Faut-il completer la
carte postale ? Ce sont les joueurs d’echecs filmes sur les trottoirs,
les femmes qui preparent le lavach (galette de farine), la musique du
duduk (hautbois traditionnel). Le documentaire peut alors s’achever au
beau milieu d’une fete de famille, comme le mariage de ce dimanche,
et c’est encore l’occasion de vanter l’hospitalite remarquee des
Armeniens.

Un souvenir nous revient precisement a ce sujet, lors de vacances
passees sur place, voila dix ans. Une belle auberge nous avait ete
recommandee, sorte de caravanserail a l’ancienne où nous debarquâmes
a plusieurs, sans avoir reserve. Or, une soiree privee se deroulait
a l’interieur, tout un repas de bapteme. Il fallait donc repartir,
non sans avoir jete un oeil desole sur le cadre prometteur.

Nous etions deja loin dehors lorsque le parrain de la fete (et du
nouveau baptise) nous rattrapa, nous supplia de revenir partager la
joie des siens. C’est Dieu qui nous envoyait, disait-il, des etrangers
On trouverait de la place ! Ce fut une soiree inoubliable, a la table
d’honneur avec ces inconnus, dans les danses et au son du duduk.

Aujourd’hui encore, pour emaner d’une ” tradition très ancienne ” ,
cet accueil-la n’en vit pas moins en nous, tout neuf, comme s’il ne
devait jamais se faner.

Soccer: Russia recovers to beat Armenia

RIA Novosti, Russia
June 4, 2011 Saturday 9:54 PM GMT+3

Russia recovers to beat Armenia

ST. PETERSBURG, June 4 (RIA Novosti, The Moscow News correspondent
Andy Potts) – Roman Pavlyuchenko put a smile back on the face of
Russian football with a hat-trick in Saturday’s 3-1 Euro 2012
qualifying win over Armenia.

The Spurs forward had complained before the game of the low morale in
Dick Advocaat’s squad but went on to supply the perfect on-field tonic
after Armenia grabbed a shock first-half lead.

However, his scoring exploits could not stem a fan exodus early in the
second half as ‘ultra’ followers of Zenit filed out of St.
Petersburg’s Petrovsky Stadium in protest over planned new laws
controlling supporters’ behaviour.

No politics please

For Russia’s head coach Dick Advocaat, the fan protests were an
unwelcome addition to an otherwise satisfactory day.

“I’m not here to make political statements, my job is to concentrate
on the game,” he said abruptly in response to a question about the
walk-out.

And as for the match he conceded that it was a result that would
impress more than the performance.

“It was a very good result because we knew we had to win,” he said in
the post-match press conference. “But it wasn’t our best performance
and we were a bit nervous at times.”

Advocaat has made a reputation for being contrary with the media, and
he wasted little time in taking a swipe at those who had criticised
his team after the 0-0 draw in Yerevan in May but were satisfied with
this victory.

“We played much better in the away game,” he said, adding, “there was
a lot of hard work out there and not much good football.

Rapid recovery

After a bright start from Russia they quickly got bogged down in a
congested midfield – and it was Armenia who stunned their more
illustrious hosts by grabbing a 26th minute lead.

It was a move which started on the Armenian goalline, where Roman
Berezovsky did well to palm away Yury Zhirkov’s shot, and swept to the
other end in seconds where Marcos Pizzelli had the freedom of the
Russian half.

He drew Igor Akinfeyev off his line and placed a low shot beyond the
retreating Sergei Ignashevich to open the scoring.

But Russia hit back immediately – thanks in part to an eagle-eyed
assistant referee.

The unmarked Pavlyuchenko thumped a low volley which bounced awkwardly
in front of Berezovsky, and while the goalie scooped it to safety the
official was quick to raise his flag to confirm an instant equaliser.

Emptying fast

If his first goal drew a delayed reaction from fans unsure whether it
had gone in, Pavlyuchenko’s second was even more surreal.

As he volleyed Igor Semshov’s cross into the roof of the net from
eight yards, two sectors of the home support were already leaving the
ground.

Some stopped to applaud, but none were persuaded to remain until the
final whistle leaving an eerie gap in the previously packed stadium.

They missed Pavlyuchenko complete his hat-trick on 73 minutes,
confidently slotting home from the penalty spot after Yury Zhirkov was
crudely checked by Sarkis Hovsepyan.

That third goal ended any fears of an Armenian come-back – though
there was one remaining anxious moment when Henrik Mkhitaryan found
Akinfeyev’s net only to be denied for offside.

The win takes Russia to 13 points and ensures they will be at least
level with Slovakia and Ireland at the top of Group B.

Their rivals face Andorra and Macedonia respectively later on Saturday evening.

‘Dr. Death’ led crusade for physician-assisted suicide

The Washington Post
June 4, 2011 Saturday
Suburban Edition

‘Dr. Death’ led crusade for physician-assisted suicide

BY: Sindya N. Bhanoo

Jack Kevorkian, 83, the zealous, straight-talking pathologist known as
“Dr. Death” for his crusade to legalize physician-assisted suicide,
died June 3 at a hospital in Royal Oak, Mich.

He had been hospitalized since last month with pneumonia and kidney
problems, close friend and attorney Mayer Morganroth told the
Associated Press.

Dr. Kevorkian spent decades campaigning for the legalization of
euthanasia. He served eight years in prison and was arrested numerous
times for helping more than 130 patients commit suicide from 1990 to
2000, using injections, carbon monoxide and his infamous suicide
machine, built from scraps for $30. Those he aided had terminal
conditions such as multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
and malignant brain tumors.

When asked in a 2010 interview by CNN’s Anderson Cooper about how it
felt to take a patient’s life, Dr. Kevorkian said, “I didn’t do it to
end a life. I did it to end the suffering the patient’s going through.
The patient’s obviously suffering – what’s a doctor supposed to do,
turn his back?”

Dying, he believed, should be an intimate and dignified process,
something that many terminally ill people are denied, he said.

He garnered a fair amount of support from other medical practitioners,
although most thought he was an extremist. In 1995, a group of doctors
in Michigan publicly voiced their support for Dr. Kevorkian’s
philosophy, stating that they supported a “merciful, dignified,
medically assisted termination of life.”

Shortly after, a study in the New England Journal of Medicine found
that many doctors in Oregon and Michigan supported some form of
physician-assisted suicide in certain cases.

One of his greatest victories occurred in March 1996 when a U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals in California ruled that mentally competent,
terminally ill adults have a constitutional right to die with the aid
of medical experts and family members. It was the first federal
endorsement of its kind.

But ultimately, Dr. Kevorkian’s impact was not in the U.S. legal
system but in raising public awareness about euthanasia and the
suffering of the terminally ill.

In the 1990s, the peak of his time in the limelight, he notoriously
tried publicity stunts of all sorts to draw attention to his cause. In
one instance, he showed up at trial dressed in Colonial attire. He
also taped one of his patient’s deaths and gave the video to CBS’ s
“60 Minutes” for broadcast.

During this period, his face was frequently on television and in
newspapers, and he gladly agreed to a barrage of news media interviews
so he could share his views. His crusade and antics were documented
last year in an HBO movie, “You Don’t Know Jack,” in which Al Pacino
portrayed him as a passionate, but intolerably single-minded crusader.

“He was involved in this because he thought it was right, and whatever
anyone wants to say about him, I think that’s the truth,” said Arthur
Caplan, a professor of bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania.
“He didn’t do it for the money, he didn’t do it for the publicity, he
wasn’t living a luxurious life – he wanted change.”

Despite his best efforts, Dr. Kevorkian was, for the most part, a lone
soldier who had an abrasive personality. Although he was the
best-known figure in fighting for euthanasia’s legalization, the
legislative results of his efforts were largely unsuccessful, if not
counterproductive.

His goal was to make it legal for a doctor to actively help a patient
commit suicide. But to date, no state has made this legal and only
three states, Washington, Oregon and Montana, have legalized any form
of physician-assisted suicide. To the contrary, the state of Michigan,
where Dr. Kevorkian did much of his work, explicitly banned
physician-assisted suicide in 1993 in direct response to his efforts.

“I think Jack Kevorkian was like a flare on the battlefield – he lit
up the issue and everyone paid attention,” Caplan said. “He got to
absolute center stage, but he didn’t have the nuance to take it
forward the way he wanted to.”

Dr. Kevorkian’s path to becoming a doctor was not as unusual as his
career that followed. Born on May 28, 1928, in Pontiac, Mich., he
wanted to be a baseball radio broadcaster, but his Armenian immigrant
parents encouraged him to pursue a more practical path. He graduated
from the University of Michigan’s medical school in 1952 and began a
residency in pathology.

It was about this time that his obsession with death began. In the
1950s, he first received the nickname “Dr. Death” when he began
photographing patients’ eyes to determine the exact time of death.

He also campaigned to use the bodies of death-row inmates for medical
experimentation.

And then, facing the sorrowful faces of terminally ill patients as a
pathology intern, he became convinced that there was a place in the
medical profession for euthanasia.

“Euthanasia wasn’t of much interest to me until my internship year,
when I saw first hand how cancer can ravage the body,” he wrote in his
1993 book “Prescription Medicine: The Goodness of Planned Death.” “The
patient was a helplessly immobile woman of middle age, her entire body
jaundiced to an intense yellow-brown, skin stretched paper thin over a
fluid-filled abdomen swollen to four or five times normal size.”

His life after this was devoted to the cause. Dr. Kevorkian, who lived
alone in a small apartment in Michigan, never married and had no
children. The people most closely associated with him were his defense
attorney Geoffrey Fieger, who represented him without a fee; and one
of his faithful, longtime assistants, Janet Good.

When, on one occasion, Good backed out of letting Dr. Kevorkian use
her home for an assisted suicide, he temporarily turned his back on
her.

To help a patient commit suicide, Dr. Kevorkian often used a homemade
machine that sent a saline drip into the person’s arm. When ready to
die, the patient could press a button that would trigger the release
of a potent chemical that would bring sleep. One minute later, a timer
on the machine would send a dose of potassium chloride into the
patient’s body, causing the heart to stop.

Dr. Kevorkian faced trial four times in Michigan for his actions but
was acquitted in three instances because of then-unclear laws on
whether physician-assisted suicide was illegal. His fourth trial was
declared a mistrial.

Unlike Michigan, most states do not have explicit laws banning
physician-assisted suicide, and nearly always, Dr. Kevorkian was
careful not to administer the fatal medication himself, although it
was his hope that within his lifetime, the law would allow him to do
so. He was thus able to escape jail for a long time.

But after he recorded his assistance in the death of Thomas Youk and
allowed the recording to be aired on “60 Minutes” in 1998, Dr.
Kevorkian was arrested and convicted of second-degree murder in
Michigan.

Youk, who was in the final stages of ALS, known as Lou Gehrig’s
disease, was too ill to administer the drugs himself, so Dr. Kevorkian
had done it for him.

During the trial, Dr. Kevorkian vehemently denied any wrongdoing.

“He calls it a murder, a crime, a killing,” Dr. Kevorkian said,
referring to the prosecutor. “I call it medical science. Tom Youk
didn’t come to me saying, ‘I want to die, kill me.’ He said, ‘Please
help me.’ There was medical affliction. Medical service is exempt from
certain laws.”

Dr. Kevorkian was sentenced to 10 to 25 years in prison but was
paroled in June 2007 for good behavior after promising not to assist
in any more suicides.

“It’s got to be legalized. That’s the point,” he told a Detroit TV
reporter shortly after his release from prison. “I’ll work to have it
legalized. But I won’t break any laws doing it.”

Ultimately, Dr. Kevorkian said his belief regarding a patient’s right
to die had a simple premise: It was in the Constitution, unwritten but
guaranteed by the Ninth Amendment, which states that Americans are not
excluded from rights that are not specifically enumerated in the
Constitution.

“There have been many constitutional scholars over time that have
believed that the Ninth Amendment deserves more respect, but Dr.
Kevorkian took it further than most lawyers and most constitutional
scholars would take it,” said Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard professor and
lawyer who was an adviser in several of Dr. Kevorkian’s legal battles,
and corresponded with him while he was in prison.

“He was part of the civil rights movement – although he did it in his
own way,” Dershowitz said. “He didn’t lead marches, he didn’t get
other people to follow him, instead he put his own body in the line of
fire, and there are not many people who would do that. In the years
that come, his views may become more mainstream.”