Examination Of Criminal Case On Fact Of Levon Gulian’s Death To Be R

EXAMINATION OF CRIMINAL CASE ON FACT OF LEVON GULIAN’S DEATH TO BE RESUMED

Noyan Tapan

Ju ne 6, 2008

YERAVAN, JUNE 6, NOYAN TAPAN. On June 6, the general jurisdiction court
of Yeravan’s Kentron and Nork-Marash communities, presided over by the
judge Gagik Avetisian, made a judgement to invalidate the decision
to quash the criminal case on the fact of citizen Levon Gulian’s
death. The court also made a decision to resume the examination of
the case. The general jurisdiction court’s decision can be appealed
against at the RA Appeal Criminal Court in a 10-day term from the
moment of proclamation.

The claimant party, lawyer Hrayr Ghukasian, the representative of
legal successor of L. Gulian, who died on May 12, 2007 in the RA
Police Criminal Investigation Department building in non-clarified
circumstances, said in his interview to journalists that "this can be
considered the first positive step in the examination of this case in
general," however it is not enough to completely achieve a positive
result, as the court decision just "gives a new start to the case and
will oblige the competent bodies to properly examine the case again."

The respondent party, RA Special Investigation Service investigator
Gabriel Petrosian and RA General Prosecutor’s Office’s senior
prosecutor Zelim Tadevosian, was not present at the proclaiming of
the final part of the judicial act.

It should be mentioned that the case on L. Gulian’s death had been
examined at Yerevan Prosecutor’s Office, and after the formation of
the RA Special Investigation Service it was passed to that structure
for examination.

Senior investigator on especially important cases of the RA Special
Investigation Service Petrosian on March 12 made a decision to quash
the criminal case by the motivation of lack of corpus delicti, by the
decision of senior posecutor of the RA General Prosecutor’s Office
Zelim Tadevosian on March 26 the complaint of the representatives
of the legal successor of the aggrieved party Aram Karakhanian and
Hrayr Ghukasian against quashing the case was rejected.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=114241

ENP Meant For Creation Of Developed, Sustainable And Secure Economic

ENP MEANT FOR CREATION OF DEVELOPED, SUSTAINABLE AND SECURE ECONOMIC AREA

PanARMENIAN.Net
05.06.2008 15:39 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) is targeted
at developed, sustainable and secure economic area, said deputy chair
of EC directorate for foreign affairs.

"Presently, the European Union faces new challenges of East and
West. It works with the countries engaged in the ENP and divides them
into regions. Eastern Europe includes Ukraine and Moldova. Morocco,
Tunisia, Israel, Palestine and Jordan are Mediterranean states.

The South Caucasus countries are viewed together with Lebanon due to
commonness of the problems," Mr Hugues Mingarelli said.

He pointed out to necessity of creation of an EU unified energy
and transport system as well as connection of old and new gas
pipelines. "We stand for establishment of dialog between the countries
and political forces. The visa system should be simplified; exchange
programs for students and journalists should be developed. At that,
I should mention that the ENP doesn’t suppose accession of the
participant states to the Union," the EU official said.

Georgia Accuses Russia Of Aggression

GEORGIA ACCUSES RUSSIA OF AGGRESSION
Yusi Simonyan

DEFENSE and SECURITY
June 4, 2008 Wednesday
Russia

GEORGIAN DEPUTY DEFENSE MINISTER: RUSSIA IS ABOUT TO LAUNCH A MILITARY
AGGRESSION TO ANNEX AND OCCUPY GEORGIAN TERRITORY; Tbilisi takes the
appearance of Russian military engineers in Abkhazia as beginning of
an armed intervention.

Tbilisi took the appearance of Russian military engineers in Abkhazia
last Saturday as an act of aggression on Russia’s part. Moscow
explained that engineers were dispatched to Abkhazia to repair the
railroad connecting Russia and Georgia.

Georgia refused to be placated by the explanation. "The military
is on the territory of Georgia illegally. It must leave," Minister
for Reintegration, Temur Yakobashvili, said. "Troops remain troops,
whatever it is they are doing."

"From the military planning standpoint, what is happening constitutes
the preparation of infrastructures for aggression," Deputy Defense
Minister Batu Kutelia told journalists. "Russia is making preparations
for an armed aggression to annex and occupy the territory of
Georgia… Our reaction will be adequate at all international forums."

"Since no permit was requested or granted, the deployment constitutes
an act of aggression," Deputy Foreign Minister Grigol Vashadze said
at a special briefing in Tbilisi last Saturday. Vashadze added that
Georgian secret services were aware of what had been taking place in
Georgia but the Defense Ministry requested discretion at this point. "A
protest will be served to the Russian ambassador," Vashadze said.

Russia points out in the meantime that the agreement to repair
the railroad was reached by presidents Vladimir Putin and Eduard
Shevardnadze in Sochi in 2003. The actual situation is somewhat
different.

A senior official of Shevardnadze’s government claims that "Putin
expressed interest in restoration of the Abkhazian part of the railroad
to restore traffic with Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Turkey… Shevardnadze
and Putin decided to set up a trilateral commission to examine the
railroad and its condition and calculate the costs. Actually, Yerevan
might have joined the commission too. However, all of this remained
wishful thinking."

The Armenian Weekly; May 24, 2008; Community

From: Armenian Weekly Editor <[email protected]>
Subject: The Armenian Weekly; May 24, 2008; Community

The Armenian Weekly On-Line
80 Bigelow Avenue
Watertown MA 02472 USA
(617) 926-3974
[email protected]

http://www.a rmenianweekly.com

The Armenian Weekly; Volume 74, No. 20; May 24, 2008

Community:

1. Bournoutian Tells the Great (and Not So Great) History of Tigran Metz
By Andy Turpin

2. Earthsound Concert Under the Radar
Success for Jazz Nights at ALMA
By Andy Turpin

3. Worcester Commemorates Genocide

4. A Tribute to Virginia
By Lisa Dagdigian

5. In Memory of John Baronian

***

1. Bournoutian Tells the Great (and Not So Great) History of Tigran Metz
By Andy Turpin

BELMONT, Mass. (A.W.)-On May 5, historian George Bournoutian spoke at the
National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR) about his
most recent translation into English of Armenian historian Hakob H.
Manandyan’s (1873-1952) work Tigranes II and Rome.

Manandyan’s work is regarded as the first serious attempt to examine the 1st
century B.C. monarch, without appealing to patriotic sentiments and with a
grounding in Greek and Roman sources.

NAASR director of programs and publications Marc A. Mamigonian introduced
Bournoutian, saying, "He has spoken all over for us and logged many, many
miles on NAASR’s behalf. He is always interesting and entertaining as all of
you will find out."

Bournoutian began by giving context to Manandyan and his pioneering work in
writing Armenian history during the Stalinist Soviet period behind the Iron
Curtain. He explained that Manandyan’s efforts were rare, since "Stalin did
not like any nationalisms for Soviet minorities."

Of Tigran the Great (also referred to as Tigranes II or, in Armenian,
"Tigran Metz") Bournoutian said, "We Armenians only have one ‘Great’ and
that’s Tigran. Most of our dynasties were weak." He continued, "The
Tigranian period was the greatest height of Armenian history."

Of his translation and additional footnotes to Manandyan’s work, he added,
"My notes reflect the scholarship of 2007."

Bournoutian continued, "Tigran Metz has only been studied in a very cursory
fashion by those European scholars interested in the history of Rome and
Pontus."

"All of the European scholars relied heavily on highly inaccurate Roman
sources that painted Tigran as a caricatured monster." Of the dubious and
exaggerated nature of Roman sources, Bournoutian cited that the Jewish
historian Flavius Josephus once said, "Even eyewitness accounts have
tendencies to play up Roman victories."

And always in Roman annals, and later the European works that pedestaled
them, there was a total disregard for Greek, Pontic, and Armenian sources.
Bournoutian said of these biases and derogations, "[The Romans] called the
Eastern peoples ‘dogs’ in their fidelity. And Europeans viewed the whole
area as a war between east and west."

Of today’s research, Bournoutian stated, "Most historians say that had the
Greek and Armenians been allowed by Rome and Byzantium to build strong
cities, it would not have allowed for later the conquests of the Arabs, the
Mongols, and certainly not the Turks."

With great enthusiasm Bournoutian told of the Parthian Persian empire at the
time of Tigran and the role it played in shaping Armenian history. He
stated, "Both cultures had common gods. Zoroastrianism was big. Hellenism
and Hellenistic gods were big."

He explained of the Armenian royal crown that Tigran brought into prominence
and wore on his coinage during his reign, "It’s unique. It looks different
from all other crowns and is called the ‘Armenian Tiara.’"

Of the culture that pervaded during Tigran’s reign, Bournoutian made very
clear to myth-bust nationalist assumptions by stating, "Court was always in
Greek-the language at that time was Greek!"

However, he explained, what made Tigran unique was that "he minted his own
coins with no Hellenistic goddesses on them-unheard of for that period."

Of extreme importance to understanding the mentality and life of Tigran
Metz, Bournoutian explained that as a teen Tigran became a royal hostage of
the Persian court. He detailed that being a "royal" hostage is very
different in treatment from simply being a hostage. Tigran was trained in
Persian military techniques and education his whole adult life. The nobility
hostage system was a comparatively civil institution in every empire of the
period and ultimately its civility was its downfall. Noble hostages became
so well versed in their enemy’s tactics that inevitably it was almost always
a former hostage that heralded the downfall of that horde by commanding
armies against them with insider knowledge.

Such was the case with Julius Caesar destroying the pirates of Cilicia that
had held him; the downfall of Attila the Hun; and the defeat of the Ottoman
forces by Vlad "Dracula" Tepes outside the Romanian city of Targoviste in
1462.

Bournoutian said of Tigran that when he was finally released from Persia as
a hostage and free to be king in Armenia, "He was 45 years old. He had
conceded 70 valleys in what is today Azerbaijan to Parthia to allow him to
go home."

Of what that geographical home actually was, Bournoutian said of Armenia’s
capital Tigranagert, "Diyarbekir [in present-day Turkey] is not Tigranagert.
The site is actually at Silvan, very close to Diyarbekir."

Armenia’s stability relied heavily on royal alliances and, as with all royal
politics, intrigue and deception was rampant. To secure his borders, Tigran,
Bournoutian detailed, "married the daughter of the king of Pontus to cover
his flank from the west."

He also explained to quash false perceptions of Tigran as a one-woman family
man that "Tigran was not Christian. He had a harem. He killed four of his
boys-but with reasons, not because he was crazy."

Tigran executed his eldest son for rebeling against Armenia and siding with
Tigran’s enemies in a bid for the crown. A younger, handicapped son was
executed after he stole the crown from Tigran’s head on a hunting trip and
road to the capital proclaiming himself king as a lark. To save face, Tigran
called for his death.

Bournoutian explained, "You can’t blame his eldest son though. He was
restless. In a time when people didn’t live past their 50s, Tigran was 75
years old and refused to give up the crown. That’s the problem with some of
us, we don’t know when to quit." Tigran reigned for another 10 years, until
he was 85.

Of Tigran’s policies as a ruler, Bournoutian stated, "He brought new
populations to Tigranagert, especially Greeks. Not just Greek-speaking
peoples but real Greeks."

He continued, "He needed non-Armenians in his kingdom because populations
were not big in cities at that time. It would not do if someone inevitably
invaded his capital and was able to take the king and all the Armenian
people under control."

Of Tigran’s faults, Bournoutian noted that he married into the Pontic
kingdom but did not back his wife’s family when they were threatened by
Rome. He said, "Rome could not tolerate a strong Armenia united with a
strong Pontus. But Tigran’s big mistake was that he tried to remain
neutral."

In the end, the famous Roman general Pompey used deceitful tactics to gain
senate support to destroy Armenia and wage a long guerilla-war in Pontus on
the pretense that Tigran had placed 15,000 Armenian soldiers on the Pontic
border in a covert war alliance with the Greeks against Rome.

In fact, those 15,000 Armenians were mercenaries for Pontus, unknown to and
not commanded by Tigran. Bournoutian compared Pompey’s trick to the tactics
used by the Bush administration to gain approval to invade Iraq, but chided
that had Tigran supported Pontus initially he would not have made himself
vulnerable.

Bournoutian ended by saying of Tigran’s true character in history, "He was
an emperor of his time, a strong king. But we cannot make him something he
was not" through nationalism.

A very mixed audience reaction followed Bournoutian’s lecture. Many
history-oriented members expressed overwhelming thanks to Bournoutian for
his clear portrait, while others were more shaken. One attendee chimed that
Tigran "must not even have been Armenian." Bournoutian assauged the crowd by
explaining, "We’ve intermaried before! We’ve undergone the Greek Orthodox
mass over the centuries, too. This does not mean these people were bad
Armenians. It was a different time from today. Culture mixes. Art mixes."

Another member asked Bournoutian to explain why at an earlier point he did
not regard the early Urartian confederation as totally Armenian. Bournoutian
answered, "Urartu was not an Armenian dynasty. It was not a kingdom, it was
a confederation. And though it was in Armenia, there are almost no traces of
the Armenian language," only Sumerian-Akkadian cunieform.

Asked why such gaps exist in Urartian scholarship, Bournoutian stated
plainly, "There are no jobs. We complain about there being no scholars, but
we have no jobs to give them."
————————————– ————————————————-

2. Earthsound Concert Under the Radar
Success for Jazz Nights at ALMA
By Andy Turpin

WATERTOWN, Mass. (A.W.)-On May 2, the Armenian Library and Museum of America
(ALMA) presented a performance by Bossa Nova fusion group Earthsound as part
of their ongoing "Jazz Nights at ALMA" concert series.

ALMA pubic relations coordinator Christie Hardiman introduced the band to
the audience. "To those of you who are new, welcome, and to those that are
not we thank you for returning," she said.

ALMA’s "Jazz Nights" series has done an exceptional job of attracting a
diverse audience demographic. The crowd on this night consisted of Armenian
regulars as well as jazz, Brazilian, and non-Armenian music aficionados.

Earthsound is a Boston-based project group that showcases original world
music and jazz alongside recorded environmental sounds. The music draws upon
the sounds and styles of diverse composers such as Duke Ellington, Antonio
Carlos Jobim, Thelonious Monk, Maurice Ravel, and Igor Stravinsky.
Improvized pieces over recorded soundscapes of natural settings complement
the unique sound of the ensemble.

Bandleader Jason Davis introduced his fellow musicians as they began their
playing with a rendition of "Raindance" from Stravinsky’s controversial
"Rite of Spring." He noted, "Those of you familiar with Stravinsky will
recognize the song, but we mix it up with a Coltrane-like sound."

Next, Earthsound followed with "Os Cinco Companheiros," a classic of the
choro repertoire by prolific Brazilian composer Pixinguinha. Choro is a
tyape of urban folk music from Rio de Janeiro typically performed with
instruments such as the flute, guitar, and mandolin.

Those "environmental soundscapes" mixed in the rhythm of Earthsound may
sound abstract on paper, but to hear them, they meld smoothly and
seductively, and are reminiscent of the Nuevo Afro Samba and Bossa Nova
compositions that have come upon the music scene in the last 20 years
(examples of which include the Malian album "Mali: Les Escrocs-Mandinka Rap
>From Mali" and the Franco-Sambas of Coralie Clément).

The band then played the Komitas-collected Armenian folk song "Vagharshapti
Par." Davis added, "It’s only fitting that being in the Armenian museum we
should play some Armenian songs."

Of ALMA and its "Jazz Nights," he noted, "Christie and Mariam [Stepanyan,
ALMA’s director] have worked so hard on everything and been so supportive.
We all as music lovers really need to thank them and support the
organization’s concerts here."

Other highlights included a playing of "El Plebeyo," a Peruvian waltz that
means "the commoner" with lyrics that speak to a working-class man
hopelessly in love with an aristocratic woman.

Earthsound member Jorge Perez played this piece on the cajon, which is
literally a box used as a percussion instrument integral to this style of
Peruvian music.

Earthsound is new to the Boston area, but to those locals that have become
addicts of favella beats in Brighton-Allston or seek to resurrect "Black
Orpheus" memories, keep tabs on their upcoming gigs at
and don’t miss them next time they play. Their ALMA
performance was among the most well received, best played, yet under
attended "Jazz Nights" concerts to date.
——————————————– ———————————————-

3. Worcester Commemorates Genocide

WORCESTER, Mass. (A.W.)-On April 26, the Armenian community of Worcester
commemorated the 93rd anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

The program opened with a prayer by Deacon Francis Merzigian, pastor of the
Armenian Church of the Martyrs. Mistress of ceremony Arpi Aprahamian
welcomed those attending and commented on the appropriateness of holding the
commemoration in the Church of the Martyrs, founded over 100 years ago by
those fleeing Turkish persecution.

Maral Saccoyan sang the U.S. national anthem and Worcester area youth sang
the Armenian national anthem.

Leena Verjabedian, president of the AYF Worcester "Aram" Chapter, talked
about the importance in remembering and commemorating the genocide and how
honored the youth were to participate in this year’s commemoration.

The program also served as a tribute to Armen Anush (Marashlian) on the 50th
anniversary of his passing.

Passages from Anush’s poignant account of surviving the genocide while
marching from Urfa to Der Zor ("Passage Through Hell") were read by Katie
Aghjayan, Andrew Abrahamian, Nooshig Varja-bedian, Angela Bahnan, Danielle
Kaprielian, Rita Bahnan, Chris Aghjayan, Anna Abrahamian, Dzovig
Varjabedian, and Sarah Aghjayan. Talin Avakian, Talar Aprahamian, and Kenar
Charchaflian read from additional passages.

The singing of "Es Inch Tsav Eh" followed the recitations.

Rev. Father Khatchadour Boghossian, pastor of the Holy Trinity Church,
commented that commemorating the genocide is a solemn occasion and that
there is much to be thankful for in the participation of the youth.

Rev. Father Boghossian led the closing prayer.

The Armenian Church of the Martyrs, the ANC of Central Massachusetts, the
ARS Worcester "Knar" Chapter, the ARF Worcester "Aram" Gomideh, the AYF
Worcester "Aram" Chapter, and Holy Trinity Armenian Apostolic Church
sponsored the commemoration.
———————————– ————————————————– –

4. A Tribute to Virginia
By Lisa Dagdigian

Four plaques, each a cover of one of her books, hung above her kitchen
table. Later, during her last year of life, these were moved to the wall
across her bed at the nursing home. These four plaques told the story of
Virginia Tashjian:

She was an author.
She was a lover of books.
She was an Armenian.
She was a storyteller.
She loved music.
She loved people and especially children.

When Virginia graduated from Simmons College she was interviewed by the
director of the Newton Public library for the position of a children’s
librarian. She told me that at the interview she told the director that if
he hired her he would never be sorry for that decision. And she was true to
her word. From being one of the children’s librarians she became the head of
the children’s department, then director of one of the branches, after which
she was appointed assistant director and eventually director of the Newton
Libraries with a multi-million dollar annual budget. She planned and built
the new main library building of the city of Newton-a major accomplishment.
To honor her, the city named the children’s department the "Virginia
Tashjian Children’s Room."

At her house as one entered the hallway, one wall was covered by bookshelves
stacked high by books. This was true with the walls of some of the other
rooms. Of course some were Jimmy’s, too, who was an author himself.

Virginia wrote seven books; the best known among them were Once There was
and Was Not, Three Apples Fell from Heaven, The Miller King and Juba This
and Juba That. These were Armenian children’s stories that were told to her
by her mother. She wanted to record these stories for Armenian children in
the United States who could not read Armenian. Juba This and Juba That was a
book written for children’s librarians and included Armenian riddles, songs,
and games.

For over 20 years every fall, a storytelling event is held in the Metro West
and Central Massachusetts towns. Its name is "The Three Apple Story
Telling." Storytellers from all over the country attend these events to
tell stories. Their brochure always mentions that their name is of Armenian
origin and is the title of a children’s book by Virginia Tashjian.

As a storyteller, Virginia was in her true element. She could sit in front
of dozens of children and adults and spellbind them all by her stories. She
would become animated while telling these stories. Often she would not
finish the story and would tell the listeners that if they wanted to know
how the book ended, they could go to their library, find the book, read it,
and learn the ending. For adults, she reviewed books, would give a 5- to
10-minute synopsis of several books, and entice them to go and read them.
She had developed a few groupies who would go to various functions and
libraries just to listen to her book reviews. This had made her life
difficult because she had to review new books each time.

She served the city of Newton for 53 years. Her retirement was a citywide
function. She received congratulatory letters from the president of the
United States, Queen Elizabeth II, and many more dignitaries.

Virginia, together with her husband, were among the founders of FACS
(Friends of the Armenian Cultural Society). At that time, FACS also
sponsored a one-hour Sunday program on WCRB. In 1968, when I visited their
house for the first time, they and their guests were in the process of
stuffing and mailing envelopes for the upcoming Armenian Night at the POPS.
Every year, she reserved several tables for her friends and family.

I remember fondly her Christmas gatherings at her house. People of every age
would gather, eat scrumptious dishes of hors d’oeuvres, dinner, and finally
desert. She would hire an entertainer for the children to do magic and sing
song. She would prepare games for the kids to play, would pass out her
booklets of Christmas carols, and would accompany the guests on her piano.
Jimmy would play Santa Claus and bring gifts for everyone, young and old. At
these gatherings, I came to meet most of their family and friends, who would
come from all over New England and New York to be together.

It was only after her death that a friend told me about the amount of work
Virginia had put into starting the Sunday School of St. Stephen’s Church.
She had written the curriculum and trained the new teachers.

Virginia loved to travel and had visited most of the European countries. Her
most favorite place was China, from where she had brought back some
artifacts and a few pieces of exquisite embroidery. Before she became ill, I
had promised her a trip to Armenia, which unfortunately was never realized.

Virginia was a mentor for me; we were both in the same profession. Whenever
I needed help or advice I would turn to her and she never declined help. She
had been the president of the Mass Library Association a couple of times as
well as that of the New England Library Association. She was involved with
the American Library Association, where she had chaired the Children’s
Roundtable several times. Now when I meet some of my colleagues who knew
Virginia, invariably conversation turns to her, and everyone speaks of her
with admiration, awe and love.

Her loss was felt not only by her family and friends, but also by the entire
Armenian community and by the library community of of Massachusetts. She
will be missed dearly.
—————————————— ——————————————

5. In Memory of John Baronian

It is with great sadness that the Sayat Nova Dance Company of Boston has
learned of the passing of our friend John K. Baronian. We extend to you and
your entire families our deepest sympathies.

The Sayat Nova family will remember for many years the support and
encouragement that Mr. Baronian always showed to us in all of our endeavors.
He was a tremendous supporter who never once denied us a contribution when
he received our mailings. In fact, he was always one of the first envelopes
we received back in the mail. We could always count on Mr. Baronian to be at
our performances and support our various activities.

Many times over the years, he expressed to us his wish to have the dance
company perform at Tufts University. As recently as six months ago, as Josh
Tevekelian greeted him at the church, he said, "You know Josh, we should
really get Sayat Nova to dance at Tufts. I will get everyone there!" Our
entire group had no doubt that if we had performed there, he would have had
everyone there. He was a dynamic, friendly, and passionate man who was
dedicated to his people and their organizations, both Armenian and
non-Armenian.

We have lost a true friend of the dance group and the community at large.
May God bless you and your families as you deal with your loss, and may you
be comforted in knowing that your loss is shared by the many whose lives
were touched by Mr. Baronian and all of the things, known and unknown, that
he did for the advancement of the Armenian people and their organizations.

Sincerely, Apo Ashjian, Director, and Joshua A. Tevekelian,
on behalf of the Sayat Nova Dance Company of Boston

***

It is from the valley below Mount Ararat, the twin peaks of John Baronian’s
Armenian pride, that we join in mourning the loss of a true man and patriot.

The conscientious carrier of his parents’ cross of pain, the triumphant
titan of his favorite Medford field, and the soldier in the service of
liberty’s cause, Uncle John built his life day by day, becoming a respected
professional, a community captain, an institution unto himself.

My own path, childhood dreams, and career choices turned in no small measure
on the charisma, counsel, and passion that were and will always remain, in
each and every one of us, the hallmarks of John Baronian.

And so farewell, Uncle John, from the cabbage patches of old Kesserig to the
cigar-scented lessons in Lexington Square and the trusted School atop the
hill, day is done. But your sun will never set.

Hishadage orhnutiun yev luis anmar.
Sirov u khorin vishov,

Raffi and Armenouhi, Garin, Daron, Van, Shushi,
and Armen Richard Hovannisian

***

Our heartfelt condolences reach out to Mr. Baronian’s family during this
difficult time. Mr. Baronian, also known as "Mr. B" and "Uncle John" to
those who loved him was a kind and loving man. He treated all the students
at Tufts as his children and grandchildren.

My husband Shant and I, along with our families, loved him dearly and will
remember him and his Jumbo spirit fondly.

Ani Setrakian Manoukian
New York, N.Y.

www.EarthsoundOnline.com

The Armenian Weekly; May 24, 2008; Commentary

The Armenian Weekly On-Line
80 Bigelow Avenue
Watertown MA 02472 USA
(617) 926-3974
[email protected]

http://www.a rmenianweekly.com

The Armenian Weekly; Volume 74, No. 20; May 24, 2008

Commentary:

1. Reflections on the 90th Anniversary of the First Republic
By Michael G. Mensoian

2. Recognizing our fate and May 28
By Lucine Kasbarian

3. Armenian Independence: A Debate of Two Dates
By Tom Vartabedian

4. May 28
By C.K. Garabed

***

1. Reflections on the 90th Anniversary of the First Republic
By Michael G. Mensoian

The 90th anniversary of the independence of the First Republic brings to
mind events that were the most unlikely precursors to its creation. During
the period from April 24, 1915 through 1923, the Armenian nation not only
experienced the excruciating agony of the genocide, but the independent
Armenia created by the Treaty of Sevres fell victim to the perfidiousness
and self-interests of Western democracies. Dissident Turks under Mustafa
Kemal Ataturk rebelled against their government’s acceptance of the treaty
provisions partitioning Anatolia. The Kemalists were unhindered as they
sought to re-establish control over their Anatolian provinces. The October
Revolution that brought the Bolsheviks to power in Russia was a fortuitous
event for the Kemalists. The Bolsheviks, capitulating to the German demands
in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, abandoned the Caucasus front allowing the
Kemalists to occupy its eastern provinces and push toward the Caucasus. The
Armenians were left alone to protect the remnant Armenian population in
eastern Anatolia and to confront the Turkish forces as they advanced toward
the Armenian core area of Yerevan and Alexandropol. Gathering what troops,
volunteers, and conscripts they could, the Armenian forces defeated a much
larger Turkish force in the epic Battle of Sadarabad-epic because it
literally saved the Armenian nation from complete annihilation.

>From this victory, the First Republic was born on May 28, 1918 under the
aegis of the Dashnaktsutiun. From its inception, the republic was faced with
severe shortages of food and shelter as it sought to care for the tens of
thousands of refugees. At the same time, the government was beset from
within and without by the subversive activities of the Russian Bolsheviks
and their Armenian counterpart. Unable to continue, the First Republic
officially ceased on Dec. 1, 1920. The Treaty of Lausanne, ratified in 1923,
replaced the Treaty of Sevres. Defeated Ottoman Turkey now under the
leadership of Mustafa Kemal was actually rewarded. Turkey was recognized as
a sovereign state encompassing its Anatolian provinces with a European
foothold across the Straits. The new treaty ignored the Armenian Genocide
and Armenian independence.

For seven decades, Armenia endured as a Soviet republic. During these many
years, throughout the diaspora, May 28th-Independence Day of the First
Republic-was celebrated. Testament to the indomitable spirit and ceaseless
efforts of the Dashnaktsutiun, faith finally gave birth to reality on Sept.
21, 1991 when a second republic was declared during the waning days of the
Soviet Union. Paradoxically the diaspora that had become an unwanted legacy
of the Armenian Genocide had by then developed into a vibrant system of
communities worldwide that were willing and able to assist their newly
independent homeland in responding to the myriad problems common to all
emergent countries. This was in stark contrast to the First Republic that
could rely on no effective assistance from beyond its borders.

The Armenian nation had not only overcome the catastrophic effects of the
genocide but also the sterile socio-economic and cultural environment that
had been foisted upon them by the Soviets after the collapse of the First
Republic. The Armenian nation that a succession of Turkish leaders and their
Azeri counterparts believed had been ground into oblivion in the "ashes" of
the genocide and soviet domination now had risen like the proverbial
Phoenix.

The Armenians of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabagh) were no less fortunate. Time and
again they had been thwarted by Moscow in their desire to secure
independence from Azerbaijan. For nearly seven decades they too had chafed
under the rule of Soviet Azeri leadership. The determination of the Ottoman
Turkish leaders to empty their eastern provinces of their Armenian
population that fueled the genocide continued unabated in a different form
when Artsakh was given by Russia to Azerbaijan. Can it honestly be said that
during the years that Artsakh was under Azeri rule the Armenian and his
cultural heritage were respected? Or that the Azeri government ever sought
to provide even the basic infrastructure that would allow the Armenians to
develop a viable economic and social life? Or that Armenian families were
able to provide unhindered a better life for their children within the
context of their own culture? Discrimination, economic exploitation, and
deprivation were all that the government at Baku had determined their
Armenian minority deserved. Their objective was to create such intolerable
conditions in Artsakh that Armenian families would abandon their homes and
lands. Did this differ from the conditions that the Armenian population
endured within Ottoman Turkey prior to the genocide?

Today Artsakh enjoys its independence only because some 7,000 azatamartiks
willingly gave their lives for their people’s freedom. Is there not a
parallel between Artsakh and the sacrifices at Sadarabad that led to the
independence, limited in time that it was, of the First Republic? On the
occasion of its 90th anniversary, might Armenians contemplate what could
have been if the republic had survived? Will history record that Artsakh’s
independence was also short lived?

Unlike the First Republic, whose existence and ultimate demise had limited
ramifications beyond its own borders, the situation in Artsakh cannot be
viewed as some isolated event existing in a vacuum. Artsakh has meaning that
reaches beyond its borders and its heroic population that impacts Armenia,
the diaspora, and the Dashnaktsutiun. Should Artsakh revert to Azeri
control, no amount of rationalizing could mitigate the significance of this
defeat. Unfortunately, any objective assessment of the current situation
vis-a-vis Azerbaijan offers few, if any, simple solutions. It becomes
necessary, at the least, to accept as highly unlikely that current
negotiations will be able to resolve the issue of Artsakh’s independence.
However, diplomacy requires that "good faith" efforts be continued under the
auspices of the Minsk Group. Yet, Azerbaijan’s claim of territorial
inviolability openly supported by the United States and Artsakh’s demand for
independence represent opposite ends of a continuum which is devoid of any
meaningful middle ground. Each side holds antipodean positions.

Given this reality, the present situation begs a proactive effort by a
specially formed committee (the "Artsakh Committee") to undertake two
simultaneous responsibilities in support of Artsakh’s position. Such a
committee would most effectively operate under an existing international
entity such as the Dashnaktsutiun.

Its primary function would be to develop materials for publication in
various media and for dissemination to appropriate individuals and audiences
that explain the moral and political justification of Artsakh’s position. An
added responsibility that the Artsakh Committee would shoulder is the
capability to immediately counter in any forum or effort by Azerbaijan to
influence opinion or settlement of the issue in its favor. A recent
resolution submitted by Azerbaijan to the United Nations General Assembly
called for (in addition to other demands) the immediate withdrawal of
Armenian forces from its territory. Although it was approved on a 49 to 7
vote, it was in essence a "victory" for Armenia and the role of the Minsk
Group co-chaired by France, Russia, and the United States, which voted "no."
Of the 192 member states of the United Nations, 146 either abstained or did
not want to participate. There is nothing to suggest that a future vote
would be favorable for Armenia and Artsakh. The need for the Artsakh
Committee to prepare position papers that would be readily available and
selectively distributed to support the reasonableness and the justification
of Artsakh’s position should be apparent.

A secondary function would be to publicize the dangers inherent in the
unilateral expansion by Azerbaijan of its military establishment and the
constant threat by the Azeri political and military leadership to solve the
Artsakh issue by military means. The threat this poses to regional stability
is real. Attention should be called to the disparity in the aid Azerbaijan
receives from the United States compared to Armenia (hopefully to be changed
under a new administration), as well as the huge disparity in the annual
government appropriations for military procurement that exists between Baku
and Yerevan. Position papers citing the danger inherent in any military
adventurism by Azerbaijan within the Caucasus region should be readily
available.

A cogent relationship must be developed connecting Artsakh’s claim for
independence with the Armenian Genocide; the treatment of Armenians during
their years under Azeri control; and the purpose in transferring control
from Armenia to Azerbaijan.

Armenians should not be fearful of the threat of military action by
Azerbaijan. The principal nation and likely the only nation that would
support any ill-advised Azeri military action against Artsakh is Turkey.
However, any overt or covert support from Ankara would be tempered by the
knowledge that Russia, Iran, and even the United States would not sit idly
by. The geo-strategic interests of Russia and Iran are aligned with the
existence of a viable Armenia and Artsakh rather than with a
Turkish-Azerbaijani victory. This is a diametric change from the interests
of the Russian Bolsheviks some 90 years earlier when they sacrificed Armenia’s
historic lands to Turkey and Azerbaijan in the misguided belief that they
would gain ideological converts.

May 28th is an appropriate time to reflect on the past and on the
relationship of Artsakh to Hai Tahd as homage is paid to those who
established and served the First Republic. Artsakh represents the keystone
of the Armenian Cause to create a unified integrated Armenia on its historic
lands of Artsakh, Nakhichevan, Javakhk, and the western provinces. Such was
determined by the Ninth World Congress of the ARF in 1919. The opportunity
exists now, some 90 years later, for the spatial integration of Artsakh with
the motherland. Failure to do so would logically call into question when or
even if the goal of a unified integrated Armenia can ever be achieved. Any
vacillation or compromise that allows Artsakh’s independence to be subverted
in any way whatsoever would parallel the fate of the First Republic. It
would be a singular defeat for Armenia, the Dashnaktsutiun and to our
brothers and sisters in Artsakh. That thought should be with those who
commemorate Independence Day of the First Republic this year.
——————————————– ——————————————–

2. Recognizing our fate and may 28
By Lucine Kasbarian

"One sniff and the bad memory is gone." Thus ran the headline from a recent
article in the New Scientist magazine. According to the piece, anesthesia
may soon be used to purge thoughts of our disturbing experiences before they
become embedded in our memories.

Doesn’t society anesthetize us enough as it is? How can we be sure that this
numbing procedure won’t make us any different from the housewives featured
in the film "Fahrenheit 451," where they consumed drugs to forget the
sorrows (and joys) that make life the demanding yet rewarding existence that
it is?

Today’s dominant cultural milieu advocates forgetting in order to dismiss
ugly truths, transgressions, and accountability-in spite of the fact that
(or precisely because) the perpetrators still rule and even enjoy the
benefits of their transgressions.

While these popular social currents carry us into a state of forgetting,
will ignoring and even wiping out painful memories change history? Or make
us any happier? Or change how genocide, ruin, and dispossession affected the
lives of those exiled yesterday and today?

What do I recall when I remember our first Armenian Independence Day?

When I think of May 28, 1918, I recall how unbearable life was in the
Armenian heartland, for centuries at a time, and brought to gruesome life in
Raffi’s historic novel, The Fool. Reading the book was excruciating, but it
memorialized the nature of the Armenian character and explained why the
Armenian liberation struggle was essential to our survival as a people. Are
these memories all bad, and should they be anesthetized?

When I think of May 28, I remember leafing through a picture book, Hayduk,
containing images of our bravest Armenian resistance fighters. Some carried
black flags that read "Mah gam azadoutiun (Death or freedom)." These
desperate, humiliated, endangered men and women took up arms as a last
resort and in so doing reasserted their dignity. Are these memories all bad,
and should they be anesthetized?

When I think of May 28, I remember our family’s ancestral homes in Sepastia
and Dikranagerd, and how with May 28, at least a portion of our native lands
still belonged to us, rather than none. Are these memories all bad, and
should they be anesthetized?

When I think of May 28, I recall Antranig Zaroukian’s autobiography, Men
without Childhood, about growing up an orphaned genocide survivor. In one
chapter, the scrappy orphans barely contained their excitement upon hearing
that a famous writer and humorist was going to entertain them one Christmas.
However, when the speaker, a genocide survivor himself, lay eyes upon these
urchins, he broke down and sobbed. There was to be no comedy at the decrepit
orphanage that day. Back then, the children were puzzled by the guest’s
behavior. It was only much later that Zaroukian understood what the speaker
must have seen and felt. (That guest was none other than satirist Yervant
Odian.) Are these memories all bad, and should they be anesthetized?

When I think of May 28, I remember learning that in 1918, independence was
thrust upon the Armenians and that it was "do or die." At the time, Turkish
generals were known to have said that they had never seen a more formidable
fighting force than the Armenians at Sardarabad, Bash Abaran, and
Karakilisse. If, following our greatest national catastrophe, the Armenians
had not defended selves and homeland with every last fiber, Armenia would
simply have become an antique geographical term for an extinct nation, much
like Cappadocia had become, according to Christopher Walker, author of
Armenia: Survival of a Nation. How could one not feel proud that these
traumatized people, surrounded by poverty, hunger, and disease, persisted
amidst the greatest of odds? Are these memories all bad, and should they be
anesthetized?

When I think of May 28, I remember standing with scores of diasporan youth
on a visit to the Sardarabad monument when Armenia was under Soviet rule. As
we sang "Seroundner took tzez janachek, Sardarabaditz," we knew that our
generation did indeed, to explain the words, recognize ourselves as the
descendants of survivors called upon to carry the baton for what Sardarabad
represented. Of all places, our summer camp was situated in Karakilisse-one
of the three historic battlegrounds where our independence was won. Are
these memories all bad, and should they be anesthetized?

When I think of May 28, I remember when the Armenian tricolor flag was not
embraced by all Armenians, and how we were frowned upon at public gatherings
for being the children of Tashnagtzagans. And yet I remember how privileged
I felt to sing "Haratch, nahadag tzeghi anmahner (forward, immortals of a
martyred race)" to these very flags when I was growing up. Are these
memories all bad, and should they be anesthetized?

When I think of May 28, I remember attending a ceremony at the United
Nations to celebrate the second Armenian Independence (this time from Soviet
rule), achieved on Sept. 21, 1991. Much as I knew it was an important
occasion, I was surprised to feel no visceral joy. Living in the faraway
diaspora with no active involvement in this freedom struggle was the reason.
I revisited modern Armenia thereafter to cultivate an attachment to our
ancestral lands and people. Are these memories all bad, and should they be
anesthetized?

These memories are not recalled simply to mark history. Nor are they written
here just to remind us to remember. Many serve as cautionary tales about
conditions that still lurk in our midst.

As my own mother’s memory fades with age, she sometimes forgets who we are.
I know she would appreciate the irony that there are some Armenians by
contrast who do not sustain memory loss and yet still don’t know who they
are. A friend once said, "Perhaps the benefit of forgetting is that your
mother can lay aside the haunting memories of genocide." Not so. Her
long-term memory appears intact. As intense as those memories of genocide
and hard-won independence may be, there is no chance of her forgetting.
Neither will I. Our fate is our destiny. We will not run from it.

Lucine Kasbarian is a journalist and the author of Armenia: A Rugged Land,
an Enduring People, who wonders if there will ever come a time when we no
longer feel like exiles.
—————————————— ———————————————–

3 . Armenian Independence: A Debate of Two Dates
By Tom Vartabedian

As a conscientious Armenian and active AYFer of the 1960s, the meaning of
May 28th, 1918 remained constant in my normal realm.

We were taught to fight for independence, keep the vigil constant. It was
automatic and if history serves us best, it took a long time to
achieve-nearly 550 years if you go back to King Levon V.

It was our cup of water after a laborious journey through the sands of time.
And it tasted cool and refreshing, quenching the parched bodies of those who
survived the genocide.

The competition to get folks out to a commemoration was keen with
graduations, Memorial Day observances and every other impediment. But we did
it and we were all the better for it. Independence was always the Hye Road.

May 28th was our inspiration and hope for a Renaissance given the USSR and
Iron Curtain.

Then, along came Sept. 21, 1991, and the New Republic-a cause for jubilation
after 70 years of servitude.

For seven decades, our people lived under a Soviet regime that dangled a
carrot under Armenia’s nose while the country lay shackled.

I recall the day with deep sentiment. Champagne corks were popped in our
church and people were dancing in the aisles during a celebration. I had the
privilege of being in Yerevan during the 15th anniversary celebration in
September 2006.

Republic Square was agog with revelers-100,000 was one estimate-as planes
roared overhead while military personnel by the droves held ground. It
reminded me of an armistice declaration.

What we didn’t realize at the time was the controversy the two compatible
dates might create. The question remains, "Which do we properly
commemorate-1991 or 1918?"

Please don’t say both. Our Armenian calendar is bursting at the seams and
yearning to breathe free with one event after another, sapping our energy
and beckoning our time.

Each year, our Gomideh is betwixt and between. Members feel it redundant to
commemorate both and are more apt to lean toward 1991-the more recent and
one achieved in our time. Historically, they were not around for 1918 and
cannot connect with the event.

This is the time frame that remains fresh and indelible in my mind. It
offers a more alternative approach with our families. Would we commemorate
the Levonian Dynasty of 1375? I do not see 451 and the Vartanantz Battle
given its proper recognition, except in one instance. The Knights of Vartan
do it justice but that’s their intent.

Nor is 301 and the adoption of Christianity such a vital day in our midst,
except maybe the church. I can’t recall seeing an actual date, only the
year.

And I can sense some resistance from ungers when the subject of the Feb.
18th Revolt against the Soviets comes up. In their eyes, it’s grown trite,
overworked, and redundant. Other than the Lowell Gomideh, I do not see other
committees so enamored with this historic event.

As independence goes, the main issue I feel is to commemorate the intent,
not the ritual.

The skeptic in me cries out, "What’s there to celebrate?" The enemy’s great
hatred is still prevalent in our country amid a papier-mache disguise one
calls freedom. More lives are being lost now to deprivation and an extreme
lack of economy than ever before.

I can’t help but wonder that with the current desecration of
Nagorno-Karabagh and other territories within the homeland, the crime of
genocide still persists in a violent and naked manner.

The loser of this grim international game is not only Armenia but the
dignity of all mankind who callously stands by while our gallant country is
being dismembered.

The recent political turmoil corroborates the languish. Destruction of our
national monuments remains sacrilegious and immoral.

One cannot conceive of the damaging effects that have caused us to become a
government in exile.

The voice of justice must be heard. It must be our voice and it must be
spoken clear and without hypocrisy. It must come from the American
government and from the United Nations calling for greater foreign aid, the
removal of barriers, and passage of a long-overdue genocide bill.

Our most sacred tenet as Armenians is our resiliency. I look to the youth
for their lofty ideals. I look to them to keep the bonds of tradition
fervent, much like I did when I was their age and May 28th was our
fortitude.

Whatever our independence celebration happens to be, I look to the
gray-haired elders of our kind-our venerables-to enthuse our sons and
daughters in this holy mission.

I look to the wealthy for support and the indigent for their moral
sustenance.

I look to the Armenian woman for her compassion and to the clergy for their
blessing.

My definition of faith is walking in the dark and looking for the light. It
is seeing rainbows when the sky is full of rain. May the restless dream of a
united homeland will continue to burn in our sleep until it becomes an
eternal reality.

May 28 or Sept. 21? Whatever the date, use it to cherish freedom and support
democracy. Gather your community intact, emphasize the cultural, and get
your children involved.

Often times, we need a transfusion, an energizer, a jolt of current which
will rekindle that precious flame of nationhood. Let’s dwell on the happier
times and not the grief imposed by a genocide.

A greater sin would be to ignore the occasion altogether. Those who shun
independence are doomed to forsake their heritage.

You make the choice.
—————————————— ————————————————-

4. May 28
By C.K. Garabed

When I think of May28, I think of more than a date on the calendar, albeit a
very important one to nationalistic Armenians.

I ruminate on certain events of my youth that, even in my senior years,
stand out quite vividly.

I think of the two centers of our Armenian life in those days in Union City,
N.J.: the Holy Cross Church and Armenia Hall. These two centers provided
spiritual nourishment to Armenians who hungered for communion with God and
nation. Their religious needs were ministered to by the Church, and their
nationalistic needs were met by all that Armenia Hall represented.

This was not only the political center for Armenians, but the cultural
center, as well. It housed the ARF, the ARS, and the AYF. It hosted
political, humanitarian, educational, and artistic events. It was our
anchor, firmly holding us fast to our Armenian roots. May 28 was as holy to
Armenia Hall as Christmas and Easter were to Holy Cross Church. And it was
observed in both solemn and celebratory fashion with fitting programs, all
commencing with the attendees’ standing and singing "Mer Hairenik."

The feeling of solidarity permeated every square inch of that humble
building. Eventually it had to be sold to provide "seed money" for the
construction of Sts. Vartanantz Church in Ridgefield, N.J.

What also stands out in my mind when I think of those days in the 1930s,
’40s, and ’50s was the complete apathy to May 28 on the part of some other
segments of the Armenian community. Not only was it not celebrated, it was
totally ignored, as if the First Republic of Armenia had never existed. What’s
worse, the same situation still exists today. The congregations of the
Giligiagan Churches continue to observe May 28, while the congregations of
the Echmiadznagan Churches continue to ignore it.

Another matter that stands out vividly in my memory is the vast difference
between the two youth organizations of the time, the AYF (Armenian Youth
Federation) and the AGAU (Armenian General Athletic Union). The AYF was a
political, as well as social and athletic organization, while the AGAU,
supposedly patterned after the HMEM, was strictly social and athletic. "No
Politics!" was the AGAU’s slogan. What was actually meant, and really
achieved, was "No Nationalism!" I should know; I belonged to both
organizations. The infusion of nationalism in the AYF, thanks to its
founder, General Karekin Nejdeh, has produced a healthy succession of
members who have passed on their dedication to their offspring, which
accounts for the vibrancy of the organization to this day.

On the other hand, the AGAU, robbed of nationalistic feelings, struggled to
retain its Armenianness against impossible odds, and finally succumbed to
the inevitability of time.

As recently as two years ago, at a gathering of Seniors in an Echmiadznagan
church, one of the members who knew where I stood as a hamagir of the ARF,
asked me this frank question, knowing he could do so: "Does the ARF still
indoctrinate its youth as it did in the old days?"

I replied, "In order for me to answer your question, I would have to ask you
to read a book. Are you willing to do so?:" When he replied in the
affirmative, I continued, "Get an English translation of Raffi’s novel The
Fool [set in the Turkish controlled Armenia of the 1800s]. After you read
that book, I will be ready to talk to you."

What was my motive? Well, I knew that the questioner was quite deficient in
his knowledge of Armenian history, and that by reading the book he just
might come to realize how desperate the Armenian people had become because
of their continual oppression at the hands of the Turks and Kurds.

Unless an Armenian knows the conditions that gave rise to the formation of
Armenian political and revolutionary parties and, eventually, May 28, one
cannot understand the Armenian-American diaspora of today, or Armenia’s and
Artsakh’s current predicament.

I’m still waiting for him to get back to me.

One final note: Thanks to the efforts of Vergin Tegrarian, a lon- time
resident of Union City, and with the participation of the ANC and the
Hamazkayin Armenian Educational and Cultural Society, the city commissioners
and mayor of Union City have, for a number of years, commemorated on May 28
the establishment of the First Republic of Armenia by proclamation and a
flag raising ceremony at City Hall.

With a symbolic ceremony, that includes the rendition of the American and
Armenian national anthems, the city officially recognizes a member of the
Armenian community and acknowledges the contribution made to the welfare of
the city by Armenian immigrants who sought refuge from the Armenian Genocide
that commenced in 1915.

May 28 of this year marks the 9th consecutive year of the Union City
observance where a guest speaker will deliver some fitting words to mark the
occasion.

President, Lithuanian Amb. Underline Necessity to Promote Econ Coop.

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT AND NEWLY-APPOINTED LITHUANIAN AMBASSADOR TO
ARMENIA UNDERLINE NECESSITY TO PROMOTE ECONOMIC COOPERATION

3955

YEREVAN, MAY 30, NOYAN TAPAN. Welcomimg the Lithuanian side’s step to
open an embassy in Armenia, the Armenian president Serge Sargsian said
at the meeting with the newly-appointed Lithuanian ambassador to
Armenia Giedrius Apuokas that Armenia also intends to open an embassy
in Lithuania.

According to the RA president’s press service, S. Sargsian assessed the
Armenian-Lithuanian relations as friendly. Pointing out the high level
of the political dialog between the two countries, he underlined the
necessity to promote economic cooperation which is still at a low
level, even though it has much potential, with the legal field being
established.

S. Sargsian attached importance to the development of both bilateral
and multilateral cooperation, including under the European Neighborhood
Policy. Noting that Armenia gives priority to European direction, the
president said that the Baltic states’ considerable experience of
Eurointegration may be of great use to Armenia.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=11

Aram Khachatryan’s 105th anniversary on 6 June

Panorama.am

18:43 30/05/2008

ARAM KHACHATRYAN’S 105TH ANNIVERSARY ON 6 JUNE

-On 6 June 105 anniversary of Armenian famous composer
Aram Khachatryan’s birthday will be celebrated in the
big hall of Conservatory named after Chaykovski in
Moscow,- said Karen Khachatryan the son of the famous
composer to Panorama.am reporter.

On that day the representatives of Armenian Embassy in
Moscow, officials and Armenians living in Moscow will
put flowers on the monument near Khachatryan’s house
in Moscow.

Note that on 12 February a big concert has been
conducted in Chaykovski hall commemorating 105
anniversary of Aram Khachatryan.

Source: Panorama.am

Raffi Hovannisian and Heritage at European Conclaves

PRESS RELEASE
The Heritage Party
31 Moscovian Street
Yerevan, Armenia
Tel.: (+374 – 10) 53.69.13
Fax: (+374 – 10) 53.26.97
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Website:

29 May 2008

RAFFI HOVANNISIAN AND HERITAGE AT EUROPEAN CONCLAVES

Paris, Berlin–Raffi K. Hovannisian, chairman of the Heritage Party
and Armenia’s first minister of foreign affairs, took part from May 21
to 28 in a series of international parliamentary conferences convened
in the French and German capitals.

In Paris from May 21 to 23, Raffi Hovannisian attended the meeting of
the Committee on Culture, Science and Education of the Parliamentary
Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) of which he is a member. He
addressed the Committee on agenda items relating to reports on youth
cooperation in Europe, the sports dimension of the Olympic Games, and
cultural heritage.

In this connection, Raffi Hovannisian expressed solidarity with Edward
O’Hara, the Committee’s General Rapporteur on the Cultural Heritage,
who intended to commence his goodwill mission to the entire South
Caucasus with visits to Baku and Nakhichevan over the summer. The PACE
secretariat had written a letter to the head of the Azerbaijani
delegation, O’Hara reported, informing him of this intention but a
response was still pending. Upon this briefing by the Rapporteur, the
Azerbaijani delegate in the Committee launched a tirade against
Armenia, Mountainous Karabagh, PACE and Rapporteur O’Hara, effectively
revealing the predisposition of his government not to allow
realization of the mission. In conclusion, Hovannisian moved without
objection that the Committee provide full support to the O’Hara
initiative, finalize the modalities of his first visit by the upcoming
PACE session in June, and reauthorize him to carry out that mission
immediately thereafter and to report back to the Committee no later
than the September session about its results or, that failing, the
reasons for its failure.

In Berlin between May 23 and 28, Raffi Hovannisian joined MPs Artur
Aghabekyan and Karen Avagyan at the Reichstag to compose the Armenian
delegation to the spring session of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly
(NATO PA). There Hovannisian addressed the Political Committee on a
draft report entitled "Iran: Making a Case for NATO’s Political
Engagement," focusing among other topics on Iran’s role in the area,
the priority of constructive engagement, as well as Mountainous
Karabagh’s liberty, decolonization and lawfully-constituted
sovereignty as a stabilizing factor in terms of the Islamic Republic
and the broader region.

In the NATO PA meeting of the Committee on the Civil Dimension of
Security, under whose auspices Raffi Hovannisian and delegation
chairman Artur Aghabekyan had recently visited Serbia and Kosovo,
Hovannisian took the floor during the discussion on "The Assembly’s
Contribution to NATO’s Strategic Concept," suggesting that the new
concept aspire for the day–or at least countenance the
contingency–that the Transatlantic Alliance and Russia will
ultimately find themselves on the same security page, and that both
members of and applicants to the alliance should demonstrate their
commitment to its "shared values" by passing a periodic state-by-state
examination on democracy, rule of law, good governance, human rights
protection, and condemnation and prevention of genocide and other
crimes against humanity. In the same Committee, he also intervened in
response to a draft report on "State and Religion in the Black Sea
Region," addressing such issues as the Armenian Genocide,
self-determination and sovereignty for Artsakh, and minority rights
guarantees, or the deficiency thereof, in Turkey and Azerbaijan.

During the plenary session of the NATO PA, held on May 27 in the hall
of the German Bundestag, Raffi Hovannisian posed questions to NATO
Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer on NATO’s regional approach to
the Caucasus and on the ostensibly Kosovo-based reasons for
Azerbaijan’s withdrawal from KFOR just as Armenia was doubling its
peacekeeping commitment to it. He also asked of German Minister of
Foreign Affairs Frank-Walter Steinmeier whether there was an inherent
connection between postwar Germany’s fortitude and will to take
responsibility and seek redemption for the genocidal policies of its
predecessor regime and achievement of its current capacity of
leadership in the democratic world; against this background whether
there was any counsel he might offer to other NATO member-states with
similar histories; and finally whether the Federal Republic of
Germany, as the exemplary global benchmark in this field, was prepared
to take it to the highest level by recognizing the German military
role in the Great Genocide and attendant national dispossession of the
Armenian heartlands during and after World War One, in this way
guiding the primarily responsible party toward its own assumption of
history and a long-awaited normalization of relations between NATO
member Turkey and IPAP partner Armenia.

In the margins of the conclave Raffi Hovannisian also spoke at a
luncheon devoted to gender challenges in peacekeeping operations, and
conferred with a variety of public and political figures including
NATO PA President Jose Lello, German Chancellor Angela Merkel,
President Ole von Beust of the Bundesrat, Chairman Karl Lamers of the
Bundestag delegation to the NATO PA, and other parliamentary and
congressional leaders from the United States, the Russian Federation,
the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Portugal, the Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, and elsewhere.

Founded in 2002, Heritage has regional divisions throughout the land.
Its central office is located at 31 Moscovian Street, Yerevan 0002,
Armenia, with telephone contact at (374-10) 536.913, fax at (374-10)
532.697, email at [email protected] or [email protected], and website
at

www.heritage.am
www.heritage.am

Armenian and Russian Foreign Ministers to meet

RosBusinessConsulting, Russia
May 27 2008

Armenian and Russian Foreign Ministers to meet

RBC, 27.05.2008, Moscow 12:42:54.Foreign Ministers Eduard
Nalbandian of Armenia and Sergei Lavrov of Russia will discuss
cooperation between the two countries as part of the Commonwealth of
Independent States (CIS) and the Collective Security Treaty
Organization (CSTO), the Russian ministry’s representative Andrei
Nesterenko reported. He indicated that the Armenian Foreign Minister
would pay a working visit to Moscow on May 29-June 1 to touch base on
Russia and Armenia’s approaches to international issues of primary
importance and to further coordinate Moscow and Yerevan’s foreign
policies, particularly as part of continuing their joint work as part
of the CIS and the CSTO, international organizations, such as the UN,
the Council of Europe, and the OSCE, and multilateral forums.

One of the key items on the agenda for the talks will be issues of
collaboration with a view to providing security and stability in the
Caucasus, as well as the current state of affairs in the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.

Book Review: War Against Azerbaijan – Targeting Cultural Heritage"

New book review.

g%20v7%20-13MAY07.pdf
London, April 2008

"War Against Azerbaijan – Targeting Cultural Heritage", part of the
series "The true facts about Garabagh".
Compiled by Kamala Imranli. (Unknown authors).
280 pages, 27x25cm, cloth-bound, including a CD-ROM and a DVD.
Published by Heydar Aliyev Foundation and The Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of The Republic of Azerbaijan, Baku, 2007
ISBN (10) 9952-8091-4-X, ISBN (13) 978-9952-8091-4-5. Price unknown.

This handsomely prepared book is clearly aimed to appeal the
prospective browser. However, the real aim of the book is somewhat
different. Books of this ilk can only serve a propaganda purpose by
aiming to create and instigate animosity between neighbouring peoples
by direct geopolitical agitation, disinformation and outright reversal
of the truth. This can help the ruling elite, who are interested merely
in their own financial and political gains and status, at the cost of
the lives of their own citizens, as well as others.

The book begins with a brief history of Azerbaijan, so as to convince
the layman that this country had been established in the present region
for millennia. It completely overlooks the fact that the real and
historic Azerbaijan has been and remains a north-western province of
Iran, and the erstwhile country of Lesser Media. During Alexander the
Great’s expeditions, one of the patriotic Median generals named Atropat
fiercely defended his homeland and in his honour the province was named
Atropatene, in time evolving into Adharabadgan, Adharbigan and
Azerbaijan.1

When using the name Azerbaijan, one must be careful to qualify what is
indicated by this name, since for two millennia Azerbaijan has been the
north-western province of Iran, located south of the Araxes river,
while The Republic of Azerbaijan is the name given to the territory
across the river since 1918 only. After becoming independent in 1918
this country was first named `Eastern and Southern Transcaucasia’
renamed `The Republic of Azerbaijan’ by the ruling nationalist Musavat
party it, thus reclassifying the local Tatar population as `Azeris’.2
This very same territory was for centuries divided into various
khanates such as Shirvan, Shamakhi, Talish, Ganja (Elizavetpol)
Qarabagh etc., parts of which were semi-autonomous under Persian or
Russian suzerainty (see map of Fig. 1). According to Toumanoff, after
the demise of the kingdom of Caucasian Albania in 1166 the power was
transferred into the hands of the Armenian Khachen family, whose Meliks
(Lords) ruled their territories and later shared power with various
Muslim Khans until the 19th century.3

In the Russian translation of the 9th century geographical work by Ibn
Khurdadhbeh, published in Azerbaijan, there is a map of the area, which
confirms the above statement. It shows Armenia reaching lake Sevan,
while Azerbaijan is denoted as the territory south of the Araxes River
as one of the regions of Iran. To the north of this are the regions of
Arran, Shirvan, Mughan, Shaki and Tabarsaran.4

The famous Russian Orientalist Academician V. Bartold in one of his
lectures given during November and December of 1924 in the Oriental
Faculty of Azerbaijan State University stated `¦ the territory that is
now known as The Republic of Azerbaijan, which in the past was named
Arran [Caucasian Albania], was given the name Azerbaijan thinking that
when this country is established, the Persian

1 Prof. Enayatollah Reza’s article in the Ettelaat periodical `Siasi va
Eghtesadi’ (Politics and Economics), Arran [Albania] wa Azerbaijan.
Chegune name Azerbaijan bar Arran nahadeh shod?, Tehran, 2002, Vol.
181-182, pp. 4-25.
2 Richard G Hovannisian, Armenia on the road to Independence, 1918,
University of Southern California 1967, p. 189.
3 Cyril Toumanoff, Studies in Christian Caucasian history, Georgetown
University Press, 1963, pp. 216-7.
4 Ibn Khurdadhbeh, Ã?à – èãà Ã?óòåÃ& #xA8; è Ã`òðàà – , Azerbaijan National Academy of
Sciences, Baku 1986, p. 290 map. 10.
1

and this Azerbaijan will become a united country ¦’.5 This political
game was analogous to the case of one of the constituent republics of
Yugoslavia, Macedonia, adopting the name of an existing Greek province
of Macedonia. The tensions engendered by this move still rumble on.

As described in the Introduction of this volume, the region was in days
of old entitled [Caucasian] Albania, populated by Albanians, Christian
since the 4th century. After the onslaught of the Turkic tribes of
Tatars, Mongols and Seljuks were overrun and assimilated with the
ruling newcomers. The resulting mixture of races later converted to
Islam, changing its language to Turkish, spoken by the new rulers. It
must be added that on the other hand the Armenians living in the
isolated mountainous regions stubbornly adhered to their language and
religion.

The population of the Iranian province of Azerbaijan, the true Azeris,
spoke an old Pahlavi dialect – referred to as the Azeri language, which
during the reign of Mongols and Seljuks in the 13-15th centuries
gradually changed into Turkish, the language spoken by the overlords.6
It is noteworthy that in Iranian Azerbaijan there remain certain
villages, where the remnants of the old Azeri dialects, such as Tati
and Harzani are spoken.7
Fig. 1 – Senex’s map of the Caspian Sea, 1742.

The map shows various regional khanates as well as Armenia (yellow) and
Georgia (red).
The area known today as The Republic of Azerbaijan consists of the
khanates of Daghestan, Derbend, Shamakhi and Shirwan (all green).
Adherbijan (purple) is shown inside the territory of Iran, south of the
Araxes River.
5 Vassily Vladimirovich.Bartold Ã?àáîÃ& #xB2;û ïî èñòî&# xC3;°Ã¨Ã¨ Ã?àâêÃ& #xA0;çà è Ã?îñòÃ& #xAE;ֈ – îè
Åâðî&#xC 3;¯Ã», Vol.2, Oriental Literature Press, Moscow, 1963, p. 703.
6 Abdolali Karang, Tati wa Harzani,do lahjeh as zabane’ bastane’
Azerbaijan, Va’ezpour publications, Tabriz 1954.
7 Dr. Saeed Oryan’s website CAIS, at SOAS, London.
2

The anonymous author of the book goes on to claim that the Central
Asian Turkic Oguz tribes of Aghkoyunlus and Karakoyunlus were
Azerbaijanis, and furthermore, that the Persian Safavids, who were of
mixed Iranian and Iranian-Azerbaijani heritage, were in fact from their
country too. Here the author has inferred that Central Asian tribes are
Azeris, while simultaneously confirming that Azeris are descendents of
the Caucasian Albanians. Which of these two contradictory theories are
we to believe?

In spite of the evidence presented by Strabo that `the river Araxes
runs through Armenia’ and `the border of Armenia and Albania is the
river Kura’, the present book claims that no Armenians lived in the
area of present day Armenia and Qarabagh, adding that the Armenians
were settled in the territory of Azerbaijan by the Russians only after
the 1813 and 1828 treaties with Persia, forgetting that since the early
ages the area of The Republic of Azerbaijan was populated by peoples
speaking Persian, Albanian, Taleshi, Armenian etc. and much later also
Turkish.8 The Armenian Meliks, the Landlords, lived in the mountainous
region of Qarabagh and due to their strategically invincible positions
generally remained autonomous, even when the rest of the region had
fallen under Russian and Persian rule. If the book is to be believed,
the famous Armenian patriot Davit Bek, one of the political leaders of
neighbouring Zangezur, is also of Albanian-Azerbaijani origin. So
allegedly are all the Christians living in the vicinity of Qarabagh and
The Republic of Azerbaijan, who are considered by the author to be the
remnants of Christian Albanians. In addition to many other travellers
who visited the region, Johann Schiltenberger9 and Joseph Emin10 have
written about the Qarabagh Armenians in their travel narratives, dating
from the 15th and 18th centuries respectively. Furthermore, the
Cathedral of Holy Echmiadzin, just west of Yerevan, established in
301-303 AD, has for centuries been the central and important religious
centre for Armenians. It should be remembered that around 1603 the
Safavid king Shah Abbas the Great forcefully relocated over 300,000
(supposedly `non-existent’) Armenians from Nakhijevan and Julfa to
New-Julfa, a town built near Isfahan for the resettled Armenians, who
were brought for their skills as craftsmen and international merchants
to help the Shah in his ambitious improvement projects, where their
descendants still thrive.
Even the famous Qarabagh historian Mirza Jamal Javanshir Qarabaghi
(1773-1853) in his Tarikh-e Qarabagh (The History of Qarabagh) written
in Persian between 1840 and 1844 states `In ancient time the town
[Barada in Qarabagh] was populated by Armenians and other
non-Muslims’11 and adds `During Safavid sultans of Iran the Vilayet of
Qarabagh, its tribes, khamsa [five] Armenian mahals [districts] of
Dizaq, Varandeh, Khachin, Chalaberd and Talish were subordinates of
beglarbegi of Ganja’.12

The book spares no effort to eradicate the presence of the Armenians
from these territories, even claiming that the Armenian religious
leaders, the various Catholicoi were Albanian. The Albanian people had
a script, invented by Mesrop Mashtotz, which, due the scarcity of its
surviving samples, are still in the process of being deciphered.13
Evidence shows that all the inscriptions on the Christian monuments in
the territory of Mountainous Qarabagh and The Republic of Azerbaijan
are in the Armenian script and language, yet the book tries to convince
the reader that somehow the local churches, where everything written is
in Armenian, are not of Armenian but Albanian origin. To this end, the
images of the churches and monuments are taken from a distance and are
depicted in such a way that Armenian language inscriptions present, are
indiscernible.
8 Strabo, Geography, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, 1928. Book 11,
Ch. 1,5-6 and Ch. 4,1-2.
9 Johann Schiltenberger, Bondage and Travels – 1396 to 1427, Hakluyt
Society, London, 1879, Chapters 62-64.
10 Joseph Emin, My Life and Adventures, London, 1792. Chapters 17 to 26.
11 Mirza Jamal Javanshir Qarabaghi, Tarikh-e Qarabakh, Manuscript
B-712/11603, Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan, p. 4.
12 Ibid, p. 6.
13 Koriun, Varq Mashtotzi (Life of Mashtotz), Yerevan State University,
Yerevan, 1981, p.288-9. 3
The conflict between The Republics of Armenia and Azerbaijan is put
squarely on the shoulders of Armenia, conveniently omitting that it was
the Azerbaijani army who started the conflict with the bombing of
Stepanakert, the capital of Qarabagh, using aircraft and Grad missiles,
destroying most of the town and killing hundreds of civilians.

The author then laments the destruction of monuments and buildings,
citing 1891 such instances (about which later). The ninth paragraph
starts with naming the `Aghoghlan’ (allegedly Albanian) cloister, whose
faith is unknown to the author. This is in fact the famous 4-5th
century church of Tzitzernavank, whose roof had collapsed in 1986 and
which, since the liberation has been restored by the Armenians and is
now an active church (see Fig. 2). It then goes on naming Amaras (4th
century, built by Gregory the Illuminator), Gandzasar (built in the
10th century, extended during 12th and 13th centuries and later) and
Dadivank (Khutavank – churches built during 12th and 13th centuries)
monasteries as being Albanian, while all the historic documentation,
founding and dedicating inscriptions and carvings in these complexes
bear witness to their Armenian origin.

Fig. 2 -The church of Tzitzernavank.
Restored by the Armenians. 2004.
Prior to coming under the control of Qarabagh Armenians, none of the
Christian monuments, Monasteries or tombs in that territory was
protected. In fact most were systematically and intentionally damaged
and destroyed and it is only after 1995 that the local Armenians
started to restore them. One example is the monastery of Dadivank
(Khudavank), whose importance is mentioned in page 8 of the book, yet
as seen in the photo on page 80, under Azeri rule, it was left to decay
and Armenian specialists have only recently restored some of the
churches in this monastery to their original state (see Fig. 3 and 4).
Yet the author includes Dadivank in the list and claims its fate to be
`unknown’!

Fig. 3 – Dadivank – as depicted in the book
Fig. 4 – Dadivank in 2007. Partially restored. 4

The Monastery of Gandzasar (in the book entitled `Ganjasar cloister’)
is treated in the same manner. The photograph depicted (page 16) shows
the monastery as it was prior to 1993, that is, while under the control
of the Government of Azerbaijan. This important and supposedly
`Albanian-Azerbaijani’ historic monastery was left to decay even
though, if we believe the book, it is part of the Azerbaijani cultural
heritage. When the control of the territory came into the hands of the
Armenians, the complex was cleaned and restored, once again becoming an
active and important religious centre (see photographs of Fig. 5 and 6)
.It must be mentioned that during the war the Azerbaijani army
bombarded the church with missiles, as a result of which one of the
periphery walls was knocked down, revealing many hidden medieval
Khachkars (Cross-stones).
Fig. 5 -The Monastery of Gandzasar as shown in the book, prior to 1993,
while in Azeri hands.
Fig. 6 – Gandzasar as it looks today, after being restored and used as
a religious centre.

The list continues in the same vein. This persists re-naming and
re-attributing all the major monuments and religious historic
buildings, into the chapter on the `Religious architectural legacy of
the Caucasian Albanians’. Subsequent chapters are dedicated to each
`occupied’ district, with some satellite imagery of the sites, small
photos of the objects and a table of various monuments etc., with
columns for their names, date, location, coordinates and present
status. The lists include the following categories
– Castles and towers
– Churches and cloisters [monasteries]
– Temples and pre Islamic monuments
– Mosques
– Caravanserais
– Ancient and modern cemeteries
– Bridges, springs and mills
– Archaeological artefacts & Museums
– Residential houses
– Schools and theatres
– Libraries
– Social clubs
– Houses of Culture
– Other buildings

The sum of the objects in the tables of various districts adds up to
1891 items, listing everything from Cloisters [Monasteries] and
Churches to Mosques and Houses, claiming that 1421 of these have been
destroyed by the Armenians, the fate of the rest being unknown.
Detailed study of the list reveals that 1189 of these allegedly
`destroyed’ objects fall in the category of Residential House, Library,
Social club and House of Culture, few of them being identifiable, in
the absence of names, coordinates or any photographs. For further
clarification the chapters of the books were scrutinised with the
following results.
5

1 – Shusha (or Shushi) District
From the 167 allegedly `destroyed’ Houses, Libraries, Social clubs and
houses of Culture, only 67 have photographic representations. Curiously
thirteen of these images show them as intact buildings with no apparent
damage, such as those numbered 134, 187, 191, 231, 256 and others.

2 – Kalbajar district
The condition of the Gandzasar monastery is shown as `unknown’. This
complex has been restored and is once again the focal point of the
Armenian Church in the district. Given the publicity it has received,
this fact could hardly have escaped the author’s attention.
From the 44 historic monuments and buildings listed, only seven are
claimed to have been destroyed and the rest are classified as `unknown’.
Out of 208 Houses, Libraries, Social clubs and Houses of Culture only
five are shown on satellite photos. Moreover item 207 (listed as
`destroyed’) appears standing.

3 – Lachyn District (Berzor)
Out of the 137 listed Artefacts, Temples, Churches, Tombs, Springs etc.
only 9 are claimed as `destroyed’ and the rest are classified as
`unknown’.
Out of the 196 Houses, Libraries, Social clubs and Houses of Culture
the status of only one is `unknown’ and the rest are allegedly
`destroyed’. Yet the satellite photos include only four of the listed
buildings, object numbers 150, 151, 266 and 299. Item 299 of these four
while being classified as `unknown’ appears to be an intact structure
on the photograph.

The list pertaining to the remaining ten districts continue predictably
in the same vein. Suffice it to say that from the 615 Houses,
Libraries, Social clubs and Houses of Culture listed none have names or
specific coordinates and only 25 have attendant satellite imagery
and/or photographs, leaving the fate of the 590 in the hands of the
anonymous author, who has chosen to classify them as `destroyed’.

Some of the bridges shown as `destroyed’ are most probably war
casualties. It is not unusual for a retreating army to destroy bridges
left behind, such that they are useless to the enemy. The retreating
Azerbaijani army in all probability destroyed many bridges which are
now claimed to be the `proofs of Armenian atrocities’ and `war on
culture’! It also lists a number of Mosques, especially in Armenia,
which have been destroyed, conveniently forgetting that during the
early Soviet era the Communists indiscriminately obliterated most of
the churches and mosques in both countries.

The book has four folding and one single page maps inserted in the last
chapter of the book.
1. Map No 1 is a Russian map dated 1823, where Armenia and Georgia are
shown divided between Iran and Russia. The territory that is now The
Republic of Azerbaijan is shown as the Khanates of Mughan, Qarabagh,
Elizavetpol, Shaki, Shirvan etc. As in every map of up to 1918,
Adherbijan (Azerbaijan) is shown as part of Iran located south of the
Araxes River, confirming our earlier comments.

2. Map No.2 is another Russian map dating from 1834, which shows the
Russian Oblasts (Districts) of Armenia and Qarabagh. This map has no
relevance to the book.

3. Map No.3 shows the immigration of Diaspora Armenians into Soviet
Armenia between 1921 and 1958. This is an irrelevant map, since the
immigration claimed by the author supposedly took place during the
first quarter of the 19th century.

4. Map No. 4 dates from 1847, where the modern day borders of Armenia
have been drawn on the old map. This is to show the changes of
toponyms, but was it not the Soviet communists who had already changed
almost all the toponyms in the USSR?

5. Map No.5 is a map of the modern day Republic of Armenia.
6
Fig. 7 – Armenian Medieval
Cemetery of Julfa/Jugha in
Nakhijevan during 1998,
before being destroyed.
Fig. 8 – The same cemetery being destroyed by the
Azerbaijani army.
December 2005.
Fig. 9 – The site of the old cemetery `converted’ into a military
target shooting range, Spring 2006.
7

Finally, what is perplexing to the writer is the following. During
Soviet rule and after independence thousands of Christian monuments and
artefacts in the territories of Qarabagh and The Republic of Azerbaijan
were at best neglected and at worst destroyed, while after independence
many mosques were rebuilt or restored. These acts of vandalism have not
been witnessed or recorded by outsiders, since the borders were closed
except in the case of the medieval Armenian Cemetery of Julfa (Jugha in
Nakhijevan), where over 10,000 imposing carved tombstones (Khachkars)
with Armenian inscriptions stood. In November 1999 observers from the
Iranian side across the river Araxes noticed that some of the Khachkars
were dislodged and broken up. Soon all were lying flat on the ground.
The last phase of the destruction was completed in December 2005, when
the regular Azeri army broke the Khachkars into pieces and dumped them
in the river, building a military target practice field in its place
(see Fig. 7, 8 and 9).14

The question is the following: if these Christian tombstones were the
cultural heritage left by the Albanian forefathers of the Azerbaijanis,
why were they not preserved but destroyed?

The very same question applies to the hundreds of well-documented
churches and other Christian monuments that once dotted the territory
of Nakhijevan (or Nachchyvan), as well as that of The Republic of
Azerbaijan, which have now disappeared completely? Were they not
Albanian-Christian monuments, the cultural heritage of the
Azerbaijanis? Does one destroy one’s own heritage?

Finally, the CD-ROM insert is a rehashing of the abovementioned tables.
Each district has an accompanying map, and a field, which should
include the details and photographs of each building. The first section
covers Shusha city, where 45% of the photographs are taken. However,
even then, as regards Houses, Libraries, Social clubs and Houses of
Culture, the information and photograph fields are mostly blank. For
the following chapters, there are very few photographs and virtually no
backup information to prove the claimed `destruction’.

The DVD is again a repetition of the claims with some low quality
images of the previous status of the towns and cities, once again
putting the blame for starting the war and destruction on Armenia. It
mentions that during the pre Soviet and early Soviet days, the
territory of Armenia was expanded at the cost of Azerbaijani land – an
`interesting’ observation, since it was during those days that the
Soviets annexed the territories of Qarabagh to Azerbaijan, while in
1922 the districts of Kars, Igdir, Ardahan, Mount Ararat and other
areas were ceded to Turkey and Nakhijevan was given to Azerbaijan.
During 1931 more territories east and west of Zangezur were ceded to
Azerbaijan, cutting off Mountainous Qarabagh from Armenia and further
shrinking the area of Armenia to the fraction of its previously expanse.

Rouben Galichian

Author of `Historic maps of Armenia. The cartographic heritage’ (2004)
and `Countries south of the Caucasus in medieval maps’ (2007).
London, April 2008
14 Photographs were taken by concerned Iranians from across the Arax
River forming the border between Iran and The Republic of Azerbaijan.

http://www.accc.org.uk/Book%20review%20En