Hovhannes Hovhannisian: Yerevan Residents Will Never Conciliate With

HOVHANNES HOVHANNISIAN: YEREVAN RESIDENTS WILL NEVER CONCILIATE WITH FALSIFIED ELECTIONS

Noyan Tapan
March 31, 2009

YEREVAN, MARCH 31, NOYAN TAPAN. In the May 31 Yerevan Council of
Elders elections the Armenian authorities will have en excellent
possibility to organize a normal, fair electoral process. Hovhannes
Hovhannisian, the Chairman of the Liberal Party of Armenia (LPA),
a member of the Armenian National Congress, stating this at the March
31 press conference, added that holding democratic elections will be
the greatest service the authorities can do to the nation. "However,
we see that they have already adopted their own style of rigging the
elections," H. Hovhannisian said. He reported that according to his
information, school headmasters and teachers have started an illegal
signature collection, the participants of which commit themselves to
vote for Gagik Beglarian heading Republican Party’s electoral roll.

Besides, according to the LPA leader, employees’ passports are
collected at institutions.

"If it goes on like this, a calculation from zero will start in the
home political sphere from June 1," H. Hovhannisian said adding that
Yerevan residents will never conciliate with falsified elections,
and a new rally movement will start.

Speaking about the meeting of the PACE Monitoring Committee held
on March 30 in the city of Valensia, Spain, H. Hovhannisian said
that the Europeans are not delighted at all with the false reforms
carried out in Armenia. "Thank God, there are no idiots in Council
of Europe and they understand what indeed takes place in Armenia,"
he stressed. According to the LPA Chairman, as a result of National
Assembly’s amending Articles 225 and 300, RA Criminal Code, "one
absurd was replaced by another."

As to ANC’s and Zharangutiun (Heritage) party’s cooperation in the May
31 elections, according to H. Hovhannisian, it will be well-organized
and solidary. "Believe us, we will hold the whole election campaign
together," he said.

Canada’s Tolerance Misplaced

CANADA’S TOLERANCE MISPLACED
By Mahfooz Kanwar

Calgary Herald
+tolerance+misplaced/1442771/story.html
March 31 2009
Canada

Canada’s Immigration Minister Jason Kenney is getting flak from the
usual suspects, but he deserves praise instead.

Recently, Kenney pointed out that while at a meeting in Toronto,
members of Canada’s Pakistani community called on him to make Punjabi
one of Canada’s official languages. It makes me angry that such an
idea would enter the minds of my fellow and former countrymen, let
alone express them to a Minister of the Crown.

A few months ago, I was dismayed to learn that Erik Millett, the
principal of Belleisle School in Springfield, N. B., limited playing
our national anthem because the families of a couple of his students
objected to it.

As a social scientist, I oppose this kind of political correctness,
lack of assimilation of new immigrants to mainstream Canada,
hyphenated-Canadian identity, and the lack of patriotism in our
great nation.

Increasingly, Canadians feel restricted in doing things the Canadian
way lest we offend minorities. We cannot even say Merry Christmas
without fear of causing offence. It is amazing that 77 per cent of the
Canadian majority are scared of offending 23 per cent of minorities. We
have become so timid that the majority cannot assert its own freedom
of expression. We cannot publicly question certain foreign social
customs, traditions and values that do not fit into the Canadian
ethos of equality. Rather than encouraging new immigrants to adjust
to Canada, we tolerate peculiar ways of doing things. We do not remind
them that they are in Canada, not in their original homelands.

In a multicultural society, it is the responsibility of minorities
to adjust to the majority. It does not mean that minorities have
to to-tally amalgamate with the majority. They can practise some
of their cultural traditions within their homes –their backstage
behaviour. However, when outside of their homes, their front stage
behaviour should resemble mainstream Canadian behaviour. Whoever
comes to Canada must learn the limits of our system. We do not kill
our daughters or other female members of our families who refuse
to wear hijab, niqab or burka which are not mandated by the Qur’an
anyway. We do not kill our daughters if they date the "wrong" men. A
17-year-old Sikh girl should not have been killed in British Columbia
by her father because she was caught dating a Caucasian man.

We do not practise the dowry system in Canada, and do not kill our
brides because they did not bring enough dowry. Millions of female
fetuses are aborted every year in India, and millions of female infants
have been killed by their parents in India and China. Thousands
of brides in India are burned to death in their kitchens because
they did not bring enough dowry into a marriage. Some 30,000 Sikhs
living abroad took the dowries but abandoned their brides in India
in 2005. This is not accepted in Canada.

In some countries, thousands of women are murdered every year for
family or religious honour. We should not hide behind political
correctness and we should expose the cultural and religious background
of these heinous crimes, especially if it happens in Canada. We should
also expose those who bring their cultural baggage containing the
social custom of female circumcision. I was shocked when I learned
about two cases of this barbaric custom practised in St. Catharines,
Ont. a few years ago.

I have said it on radio and television, have written in my columns in
the Calgary Herald, and I have written in my latest book, Journey to
Success, that I do not agree with the hyphenated identity in Canada
because it divides our loyalties. My argument is that people are not
forced to come to Canada and they are not forced to stay here. Those
who come here of their own volition and stay here must be truly
patriotic Canadians or go back.

I am a first-generation Canadian from Pakistan. I left Pakistan 45
years ago. I cannot ignore Pakistan, because it is the homeland of my
folks, but my loyalty should be and is to Canada. I am, therefore,
a proud Canadian, no longer a Pakistani-Canadian. I am a Canadian
Muslim, not a Muslim Canadian.

I do not agree with those Canadians who engage in their fight against
the system in their original countries on Canadian soil. They should
go back and fight from within. For example, some of the Sikhs, Tamil
Tigers, Armenians and others have disturbed the peace in Canada because
of their problems back home. Recently, a low-level leader of MQM, the
Mafia of Pakistan, came to Canada as a refugee and started to organize
public rallies to collect funds for their cause in Pakistan. On July
18, 2007, the Federal Court of Canada ruled that MQM is a terrorist
group led by London-based Altaf Hussain, their godfather. As a member
in the coalition government of Pakistan, this terrorist group is
currently collaborating with the Taliban in Pakistan. That refugee
was deported back to Pakistan. Similarly, I dis-agree with newcomers
who bring their religious baggage here. For example, Muslims are less
than two per cent of the Canadian population, yet in 2004 and 2005,
a fraction of them, the fundamentalists, wanted to bring sharia law
to Canada. If they really want to live under sharia, they should go
to the prison-like countries where sharia is practised.

I once supported multiculturalism in Canada because I believed it gave
us a sense of pluralism and diversity. However, I have observed and
experienced that official multiculturalism has encouraged convolution
of the values that make Canada the kind of place people want to
immigrate to in the first place.

Here, we stand on guard for Canada, not for countries we came
from. Like it or not, take it or leave it, standing on guard only
for Canada is our national maxim. Remember, O Canada is our national
anthem which must not be disregarded by anybody, including the teacher
in Springfield, N. B.

Mahfooz Kanwar, PHD, Is A Sociologist And An Instructor Emeritus At
Mount Royal College.

http://www.calgaryherald.com/entertainment/Canada

Russian Finance Minister Considers It Early To Speak About Creation

RUSSIAN FINANCE MINISTER CONSIDERS IT EARLY TO SPEAK ABOUT CREATION OF JOINT CURRENCY IN CIS TERRITORY

ARMENPRESS
March 31, 2009

MOSCOW, MARCH 31, ARMENPRESS: Vice prime minister of Russia, Alexey
Kudrin, who is also the country’s finance minister, considers it
early to speak about creation of joint regional currency in the
CIS territory.

"Now it is early to speak about joint currency but the expansion of
usage of currencies will be based on the volume and geography of the
trade," PRIME-TASS cited him as saying.

Kudrin explained that "great volume of trade is being made in Russian
rubles but we may also speak about the expansion of usage of Kazakh
currency."

Armenia: Pace Takes Step Back From Punishing Armenia

ARMENIA: PACE TAKES STEP BACK FROM PUNISHING ARMENIA

Eurasianet

March 31, 2009

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe appears to be
easing up on its criticism of the Armenian government, thus diminishing
the possibility that the European body will sanction Yerevan over
alleged rights abuses committed in connection with election-related
political violence in 2008.

The Monitoring Commission of Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe (PACE) recently noted that the Armenian government had made
progress toward complying with PACE recommendations. [For background
see the Eurasia Insight archive]. PACE officials had hinted that
Armenia might be stripped of its voting rights in the pan-European
forum, if it not take action on the PACE mandates. [For background
see the Eurasia Insight archive].

David Arutyunian, the governing Republican Party’s delegate to PACE,
told the Regnum news agency that the Monitoring Commission welcomed
recent amendments to Armenia’s criminal code. At the same time, a PACE
demand that suspected political prisoners in Armenia be released from
custody has not been fulfilled.

The Monitoring Commission held a session on March 30 in Valencia,
Spain. According to Arutyunian, the commission does not plan to
recommend that a full PACE session take action to punish the Armenian
delegation. Raffi Hovannisian, a PACE delegate from opposition
Heritage Party, criticized PACE for softening its stance toward
Armenian government, the A1plus news site reported.

http://www.eurasianet.org

Foreign Ministry Of Armenia Denies Statement Being Attributed To Arm

FOREIGN MINISTRY OF ARMENIA DENIES STATEMENT BEING ATTRIBUTED TO ARMENIAN FM SAYING ‘OPENING OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH BORDER HAS BEEN SCHEDULED AFTER US PRESIDENT’S VISIT TO TURKEY

ArmInfo
2009-03-30 15:42:00

ArmInfo. Foreign Ministry of Armenia denied the statement being
attributed to FM of Armenia Edward Nalbandyan saying ‘opening of the
Armenian- Turkish border has been scheduled after US President Barack
Obama’s visit to Turkey’. As Head of the Department for Mass Media
Relations of Armenia’s FM press service Tigran Balayan told ArmInfo,
the information about the statement made by Armenia’s foreign minister
does not meet the reality.

To note, the Azerbaijani media report referring to the Turkish press,
in particular, CNNTurk TV channel and the news portal Abhaber.com,
that E. Nalbandyan made such a statement. According to the Turkish
media, opening of the border will take place before April 24 and after
US president’s visit to Turkey. ABhaber.com, referring to source in
the European Commission reports that the Turkish foreign minister
schedules to visit Armenia in the midst of April. To recall, Foreign
Minister of Turkey Ali Babacan actually intends to visit Armenia and
take part in OBSEC session.

Chief Of General Department Of Civil Aviation Of Armenia Artem Movsi

CHIEF OF GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION OF ARMENIA ARTEM MOVSISYAN: ARMENIA NEEDS RENEWAL OF AVIATION LEGISLATION

ArmInfo
2009-03-30 17:57:00

Arminfo. Armenia needs renewal of aviation legislation, Chief of
General Department of Civil Aviation of Armenia Artem Movsisyan said
today. Earlier he submitted the draft law on alterations and amendments
to the law "On aviation" to the parliament.

He also added the necessity of making alterations rose on the basis
of research and practical tasks as well as taking into account the
necessity of meeting IRAO and other aviation organizations’ documents.

Charles Aznavour Enjoys Russian People’s Love

CHARLES AZNAVOUR ENJOYS RUSSIAN PEOPLE’S LOVE

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.03.2009 13:33 GMT+04:00

Chairman of the Russian Federation Council Sergei Mironov met with
renowned singer and actor Charles Aznavour. Chairman of the committee
on economic policy, entrepreneurship and property Hovhannes Ohanyan
also attended the meeting.

"We appreciate highly your contribution to music and cinema. Eternal
love is your gift to humanity," Mr. Mironov said.

Charles Aznavour, (born Shahnour Varenagh Aznavourian on May 22, 1924,
Paris) is an Armenian-French singer, songwriter, actor and public
activist. Besides being one of France’s most popular and enduring
singers, he is also one of the most well-known singers in the world. He
is known for his characteristic short figure and unique tenor voice;
clear and ringing in its upper reaches, with gravely and profound
low notes. He has appeared in more than 60 movies, composed about
1,000 songs (including at least 150 in English, 100 in Italian, 70
in Spanish, and 50 in German), and sold well over 100 million records.

In 1998, Charles Aznavour was chosen as Entertainer of the Century by
CNN and users of Time Online from around the globe. He was recognized
as the century’s outstanding performer, with nearly 18% of the total
vote, edging out Elvis Presley and Bob Dylan.

He is the founder of Aznavour for Armenia charitable organization
along with his long-time friend and impresario Levon Sayan.

In December 2008, Azvavour acquired Armenian citizenship.

Javakhk Issue And National Interest

JAVAKHK ISSUE AND NATIONAL INTEREST
By Sevak Artsruni

AZG DAILY
24-03-2009

Javakhk

Javakhk and its adjacent Armenian-populated regions were parts of
historical Armenia. In general, the national-cultural heritage of the
Georgian Armenians became a foundation-stone for re-establishment of
the Armenian statehood in the 20th century.

Nevertheless, today the Armenian nation is facing a demographic crisis
in Georgia. It is indisputable that the crisis is not the problem of
the Armenians of Javakhk and Georgia, but the entire Armenian nation.

For Armenia, Georgia and the world, Javakhk issue didn’t exist
before 2007. The situation has changed since 2007, especially
July 2008, after the arrests of the Armenian political activists
in Javakhk. Authoritative international organizations and offices
started to publish reports on Javakhk issue and rights of the ethnic
minorities in Georgia, and the most important thing – recommendations
were sent to the Georgian authorities for solution of the issues that
the Armenians of Javakhk and Georgia faced. Everybody realized that
the situation was alarming and that the Armenians of Javakhk lived
under conditions when their elementary rights were grossly violated.

Preservation of national and religious essence – is the elementary
right of a human being. Protection of national interest demands
involvement of every individual and organization – the constituents
of the Nation – in the above-mentioned issue.

While the Armenian figures in Javakhk protect the all-Armenian issue at
the cost of their lives and freedom, the Armenians of motherland and
Diaspora should only protect the rights of Armenians of Georgia and
Javakhk by reminding the Georgian authorities that according to the
UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ Preamble "it is essential,
if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort,
to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should
be protected by the rule of law".

In order to avert undesirable developments round Javakhk issue,
Armenians of the world should unite round imperative necessity to
establish rule of law in Javakhk and whole Georgia and abolish the
crisis in the sphere of Georgian Armenians’ rights.

ANKARA: Remembrance Of Things Past

REMEMBRANCE OF THINGS PAST
by Christopher Vasillopulos

Today’s Zaman
March 23 2009
Turkey

Some years ago in my first days on northern Cyprus, I participated
in an ugly incident. While attending an international conference on
nationalism at Eastern Mediterranean University, I lost my temper with
a Turkish-Canadian economist. Instead of presenting an academic paper,
he complained of Armenian-Canadian efforts to insert the Armenian
massacre into the school curriculum.

His children were being called "war criminals" and "murderers." As
a father he was outraged and eager to protect his children from
abuse. As an ethnic Turk he felt disrespected and misunderstood. He
went so far as to deny that anything happened to the Armenians beyond
the normal horrors of war. As he received a standing ovation from a
largely Turkish-Cypriot audience, the rest of us were stunned into
silence. Except for me.

I had agreed to go to the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (KKTC)
despite many objections, mostly from the Greek-American community,
and personal concerns. I did not want to become a propaganda weapon
in an inter-cultural conflict. And I certainly did not want to be
associated with a claim that several hundred thousand Armenians took
a walk in the Syrian desert and who knows what happened to them. So
I confronted a Turkish-Canadian colleague in a way that was rude and
insensitive to his concerns as a father and an ethnic Turk. When I
regained my composure, I apologized to him and forgot the incident.

Until this week, that is. A friend of mine, Manoug Manougian,
had produced an award-winning four-hour documentary, "The Genocide
Factor." As part of our human rights program, he spoke to faculty and
students at my university. Some of my Turkish students came to the
lecture, which included graphic illustrations of many massacres and
heart-breaking descriptions of rape, torture and murder by survivors
and relatives of survivors, including Armenians. I was concerned
that Manougian’s natural and inevitable emphasis on Armenians would
trouble my Turkish students. They said they were all right, when I
inquired about their reaction to what must have seemed to them to
be a one-sided presentation. Although the presentation did speak of
many other atrocities, it did spend more time on Armenians than any
other. My students seemed stricken and upset. What surprised me more
was how upset I was. It was not that I thought the presentation was
unfair, but that I could not stand to see my students hurt.

So, finally, after 20 years, I understood, at least partially,
my Turkish-Canadian colleague’s concern for his children. It is
not disrespectful to the suffering of thousands to be worried about
the suffering of your children or your students or anyone you feel
responsible for. My thoroughly decent students were being singled
out, unintentionally to be sure, as the descendents of war criminals,
no matter how many years ago, no matter how many regime changes have
intervened. So the damage to Armenians nearly 100 years ago continues
to do damage today.

Resuming my role as a political scientist, I considered what might be
done to close out this tragic issue. What must be done to place it in
its proper historical and cultural context? What must be done to honor
the deaths of so many innocent women and children? What must be done
to honor the children of the present of all nationalities? What must
be done to make such tragedies less likely? I do not have answers to
these questions. Let me echo instead the suggestions of my German
colleagues, who have had experience in this sort of thing. There
should be an inquiry conducted under the supervision of international
scholars who produce a report. The purpose of the report is not to
indict or condemn but to ascertain the facts in the context of the
political and cultural conflicts of World War I. This is more than a
process of setting the historical record straight, of eliminating the
exaggerations of the victims and the denials of the perpetrators. It
is more than an acknowledgment of Armenian suffering and Turkish
complicity. A definitive and objective account would enable Turks and
their friends to live in the present and to face the future without
fearing that their children will be held responsible for atrocities
done by different people in a different time and a different place
and under circumstances than can only be imagined. I cannot say that
the pain inherent in this revisiting the past will be worth it. I
can say that the pain endured by many by not clearing the record is
as difficult to endure as its promise to be unending.

Impending CIS heads of government meeting agenda discussed in Minsk

Source: PanARMENIAN.Net
URL:
Date: 20.03.2009 11:35 GMT+04:00

Impending CIS heads of government meeting agenda discussed in Minsk

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The CIS executive committee will bring together
permanent representatives of CIS member states on Friday to discuss
the agenda of the meeting of CIS heads of government due in Kazakhstan
on May 22.

Prime Ministers will be offered to consider measures to implement the
first stage of CIS strategy of economic development till 2020.

The agenda will also include discussion of action plans for 2009-2010,
socials and security issues, the CIS press office reported.

http://www.panarmenian.net/news/eng/?nid=29650