ANKARA: Gul Hopes NK Issue Between Azerbaijan, Armenia To Be Solved

Turkish Press
Sept 13 2008

Turkey’s President Hopes Karabakh Issue Between Azerbaijan and Armenia
To Be Solved

Published: 9/13/2008

BAKU – Turkey`s President Abdullah Gul said on Wednesday that he hoped
Karabakh issue between Azerbaijan and Armenia would be solved through
dialogue, understanding and mutual talks. Holding a joint press
conference with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in Baku, Gul said
that they discussed bilateral and regional matters.

Gul said that relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan were perfect in
every aspect. "Turkey has always supported Azerbaijan in political
issues; and will continue to do so," he added.

Gul gave Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline and Baku-Tbilisi-Kars
railway projects as examples to good economic relations between Turkey
and Azerbaijan.

Gul said that they assessed the new situation in Caucasus during the
meeting and he also briefed Aliyev about his meeting with Armenian
President Serzh Sargsian.

Gul said that Aliyev`s Caucasus vision and his realist analysis about
Caucasus impressed him very much.

ANKARA: Turkey Says Opportunities Emerge To Solve Nagorno-Karabakh C

TURKEY SAYS OPPORTUNITIES EMERGE TO SOLVE NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

Hurriye
Sept 11 2008
Turkey

Turkey’s president said Wednesday Armenia had changed its approach and
opportunities had emerged to solve the long-standing Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict. Turkey’s foreign minister held a telephone conversation
with his U.S. counterpart who extended her support to Turkey’s
initiatives. (UPDATED)

Gul told reporters in Ankara following his visits to both Yerevan and
Baku he observed the same honest and sincere desire for a solution
both in Armenia and Azerbaijan.

"In Azerbaijan I saw the same frank, honest and sincere desire
for a solution and respect to opponent that I observed in Armenia
earlier. There is a significant opportunity to resolve a long-standing
problem. We need to seize this opportunity. Also, everyone is aware
that if a solution is reached, it paves the way for cooperation in
the region," he said after his return from Azerbaijan where he met
the President Ilham Aliyev.

Gul’s Azerbaijan visit came a while after his landmark visit to
Yerevan. Azerbaijan and Armenia have no diplomatic relations due to
Yerevan’s invasion of 20 percent of Azerbaijani territory.

Turkey had proposed the formation of Caucasian alliance to help the
resolution of conflicts through dialogue. Turkey, Russia, Georgia,
Armenia and Azerbaijan are planned to take part in this new formation.

Ankara has intensified its diplomatic efforts for the Caucasus region
as well as the Middle East since the Georgia-Russia war in August.

Gul said Wednesday Armenia had the will to withdraw from the occupied
Azerbaijani territories in case of a final agreement between the
two countries.

"My talks with Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents revealed the
need for exchange of views between the two countries on bilateral,
regional and international developments. Turkey and Azerbaijan have
always advocated that the regional problems should be resolved through
peaceful and diplomatic ways," he said.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan held a telephone conversation
with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Wednesday.

Burak Ozugergin, spokesman for the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
told the A.A on Thursday that recent developments in the Caucasus
were high on agenda and Babacan informed Rice on his visit to Armenia.

"Babacan reiterated that Turkey extended support to the Minsk process
aiming at finding a solution to the Upper Karabakh dispute between
Azerbaijan and Armenia. He said that such a solution would have a
positive impact on Turkey-Armenia relations. Meanwhile, Rice said that
they would support Turkey’s regional initiatives," Ozugergin added.

Swindling Or Treachery

SWINDLING OR TREACHERY
Armen Tsaturyan

Hayots Ashkhar Daily
09 Sep 2008
Armenia

The activists of Armenian Pan National Movement under the name of
"Armenian National Congress" try to represent the necessity of starting
a new wave of demonstrations from September 12, as "the beginning of
the crucial stage of the national struggle against tyranny".

Of course we have many times witnessed similar "crucial stages" when
people become extremely enthused and immediately get disappointed. But
as usual waiting for the beginning of the same boring scenario we can’t
help recording that in terms of time it can match with the culmination
of the developments taking place in the "region and around it".

If the opposition used to consider end of September as the decisive
stage of their actions, at the moment it has been canceled up to
October.

Similar bizarre "friendliness" undoubtedly derives from the "schedule"
of the new developments expected in the region. September is going to
be a crucial stage for the negotiations and at the end of the week
UN will convene its General Assembly. The US Presidential elections
are in November, which means the necessity of the clarification of
regional issues will very soon appear.

Not only does the situation intensify in the South Caucasus, but also
new difficulties and obstacles appear. Let’s enumerate o nly part of
them: besides intensively furnishing Georgia with arms, in the recent
times the USA, International Currency Fund and the European Union have
unimaginably increased the sum allocated for official Tbilisy. This
fact and especially the appearance of NATO’s military ships in the
Black Sea made Russia very nervous.

By Moscow’s instigation Armenian – Turkish negotiations are becoming
more and more vital; soon Armenian – Azerbaijani negotiations will
be added to it.

Turkey, in its turn, plays a double game, trying to suppress the
activeness of the both sides and benefit from the created situation,
and besides all this they secretly participate in furnishing Georgia
with arms.

In the near future a very serious crises can start in the Middle East
as well, linked with Iran’s nuclear programs, etc, etc.

It is natural that in such circumstances the internal political
situation created in Armenia directly depend on the situation created
in the region.

Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s interview regarding the developments in South
Osatia is the bright example of the awareness of this situation. The
interview was followed by the reverences addressed to the West. Davit
Shanazaryan’s "in-law diplomacy", who left for the Unites States
under the plea of participating in the Congress of the Democrats,
was the new proof of the before mentioned.

In parallel reverences were addressed to Turkey by=2 0the "Congress",
by postponing their demonstration planned before the football game.

And in the recent days Armenia’s first President made another
swindling announcement, in his interview under the heading "We Will
Strengthen the Pressure on the Regime", given to the Russian newspaper
"Moskovskaya Pravda". In response to the question about solving the
crises faced by Armenia by "the realization of fundamental reforms",
Ter-Petrosyan announced: "The regime is objectively not ready to make
radical reforms, because it will mean to saw the stump on which they
are sitting."

So we didn’t manage to clarify why and how are the authorities sawing
the stump instead of the brunch? But judging from Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s
obstinacy not to see the reforms made recently in Armenia it is not
difficult to conclude that he intends to benefit from the situation
created in the region.

Because the possibility of Armenian – Turkish and Armenian –
Azerbaijani negotiations is the best moment were we will be in need
of Ter-Petrosyan’s ideas.

Had we not faced swift and extremely dangerous developments in
our region we could easily ignore Ter-Petrosyan’s foreign policy
equilibristic. He could have given one interview per week, each time
expressing diametrically different ideas and finding himself in a
idiculous situation.

But the situation around Armeni a is so tough that the swindling of
the opposition leader is more like a treachery.

Voices In The Wilderness

VOICES IN THE WILDERNESS
By Noam Ben Ze’ev

Ha’aretz
Sept 10 2008
Israel

PETRA, Jordan – Only the view makes the descent to the Red Rock
easier. Your feet hurt as they search for something to grab onto
on the meandering road down. But your attention is not directed at
them and their problems at all: At the foot of these chalk rocks with
their heads in the sky, which nature has formed into incredible shapes
and adorned with many colors, your eyes are always directed upward,
and your attention is occupied by an attempt to take in the sights.

And now another sense is activated, your sense of hearing: The song of
a choir suddenly echoes among the rocks, sacred Christian music. And a
few minutes later, another choir, this time an adaptation of an Arabic
song. By the last bend before the ancient Nabatean temple appears,
they are all singing, each in turn: choirs from Baghdad, Damascus,
East Jerusalem, Amman and Tripoli, Lebanon. Advertisement

That is how the historic first festival of choirs from the Arab world,
called Aswatuna, which means "Our Voices," reached one of its high
points. And at the end, in a large area at the foot of the Red Rock,
all the choirs gathered and sang together, realizing, in the blending
of their voices, the festival’s ideal.

First encounters

"Three years ago, we began to plan the convention and the festival,
and it was a dream. Now it is coming true," said Andre de Quadros, the
artistic director and moving spirit behind Aswatuna, which ended two
weeks ago. De Quadros, a native of India who studied at the academy
of music in Bombay, is a conductor, professor of music and director
of the School of Music at Boston University.

"Our goal is social, consolidating the musical community in the Arab
world by means of song, and we have begun here, in the Middle East,"
he said. "Jordan was a logical choice because today, it is the only
place that everyone can reach overland."

And why in Petra of all places?

"Because it is an ancient historical site, a melting pot for the
nations of the region, but also because the place is isolated, in
the middle of the desert, like a monastery. Here there is no city to
which one can escape for shopping or entertainment in the middle of
the activity," he said with a smile.

And what motivated you personally to embark on such an initiative?

"As an Indian, I have a strong connection with the Arab world,"
said De Quadros. "But first of all, I really believe in building
communities by means of singing together, and that a festival has
the potential to be a breakthrough for that."

The power of music

A concerned note crept into the festive supper that opened
the gathering: The Sharagan choir from Baghdad, conducted by
Annie Melconian, had not yet arrived. Initial meetings among the
participants, who were scattered randomly among the tables in order
to break down barriers, took place in the shadow of this concern:
36 hours had already passed since the choir left the city, which is
less than a 12-hour drive away, and it was still en route.

Nevertheless, the meal was cheerful, and its conclusion enabled
the choirs to introduce themselves informally by singing among the
tables. The last to sing were members of a guest choir, Voces Nordicae,
from Sweden. Without even getting up from their seats, the choir’s
members amazed everyone with their clean, clear sound. Their singing
defined an hierarchy that was maintained throughout the gathering: On
one hand, the Arab choirs, whose level is high by any international
criterion, but on the other hand, on an entirely different level,
Voces Nordicae: a super-choir of 16 virtuoso soloists with no vocal
or technical boundaries, which provided an educational model during
the event by demonstrating what heights a chamber choir can achieve
in terms of vocal ability and repertoire.

The next morning, after a few hours of sleep, the Iraqi choir
was already attending the festive reception that opened the day’s
events. De Quadros introduced the choir excitedly, and as its members
described the trials they had experienced during the trip, the young
conductor Melconian burst into tears. She is a graduate of Baghdad
University, and during the two years that she has been conducting
the choir – which has been more or less rehabilitated since the war
and now performs on Christian holidays and at memorial events for the
Armenian holocaust – she has had to survive difficult conditions in
order to continue to lead the young singers.

De Quadros introduced the choirs and the conductors: Palestinian
representative Hania Soudah-Sabbara of East Jerusalem, a graduate of
the music academy in Jerusalem, and his Choir of the Custody of the
Holy Land; conductor and executive director of the festival Shireen
Abu Khader, who has a master’s degree from the University of South
Carolina and conducts the Jordanian choir, Dozan wa Awtar Singers;
Viktor Babenko of Russia, winner of many awards, who has been teaching
since 1992 at the High Institute of Music in Damascus and founded its
chamber choir; and Lebanese-Armenian Barkev Taslakian, conductor of
the Al Fayha choir from northern Lebanon.

"Each of those who helped to produce the convention devoted hundreds
of hours over these years," said De Quadros to the hundreds of
attendees, as he thanked the participants and supporters, including
the International Festival for Choral Music (IFCM) and Sweden Concerts,
the Swedish association for concert music. "Not in order to make music
for fun, but out of thought for the long term – so that choirs will
meet one another year after year, for a week of work and singing. We
want to build the infrastructure for that together, and we believe
in the power of music. What this week leaves within us will define
the continuation."

The first Arab choral festival was underway.

Western influence

In the common perception, a mixed four-part choir of men and women
is a foreign implant in the Arab cultural-musical world. The Arab
vocal tradition is seen as based only on soloists accompanied by
an instrument, and the singing is meant to arouse strong feelings
by expressing profound sadness or great happiness. But the week of
singing at the choral festival demonstrated totally different aspects
of this culture.

The first hint of that appeared at a concert of the music institute
choir from Damascus. The 40-minute performance excited the festival’s
participants, as they heard Western choral music, adaptations of Arab
songs, a Ukrainian folk song and, for the finale, an Arab spoken song
about a pretend quarrel between girls and boys, which brought the
listeners to their feet. From jazz rhythms to Arab quarter tones –
it had everything.

Religious, folkloristic and classical choral genres have always
existed in the Arab musical world alongside solo performances. That
was demonstrated by the head of the National Conservatory for Music
in Amman, Kifah Fakhouri, who related the history of Arab group
singing. People always sang together, he said – work songs, life cycle
songs and religious songs. But the rise of radio, Egyptian films and
the advent of missionaries from the West led to the emergence of the
concept of the choir.

One after another, the choirs demonstrated a high level of technique,
vocal production, work and choice of repertoire. But it turns out
that this high level did not result from a comprehensive, nationwide
musical education system in those countries. These choirs are isolated,
localized phenomena, the fruit of the vision of people dedicated to
the idea.

In Damascus, according to a Palestinian colleague who recently
returned after living there for eight years (Syrians are forbidden
to talk to Israelis, and at this festival, too, they strictly
observed this prohibition), the music institute’s choir is the only
professional choir, and acceptance to the institute depends on one
of two conditions: growing up in a family with a Western cultural
bent that can afford to pay for music lessons for the children from
an early age, or being exceptionally talented. Nevertheless, it is
clear that the choirs at the festival reflect a process of awakening
to concert music that is occurring in all the Arab countries.

The most hidden emotions

The feeling throughout the festival was that there was no time to
waste. Organizers De Quadros and Abu Khader are totally devoted to
the event, and the schedule was murderous: After the early breakfast,
people immediately divided into working groups – separate vocal
workshops for the male and female singers, lectures about music in
the Arab world and choral music in general, a round-table discussion
about the problems of conductors and musical directors of choirs in
Arab countries and ways of solving them. At lunchtime, there were
concerts by the choirs, and after the quick lunch, a joint rehearsal
by all the choirs for the final concert.

The evening brought more workshops and individual rehearsals, or
special events such as the journey to Petra, and at night came the
opportunity for parties and meeting new people. And it was the same
every day. Only on the last day, before the final concert at Little
Petra, at the foot of one of the pinkish temples in the fissures
of the rocks, was it possible to find the words "free time" in the
schedule – two hours during which the hundreds of participants could
breathe easy for a little while.

The concert by the Al Fayha choir from Lebanon was another high point,
and as in other concerts, here, too, the special attitude of all the
attendees to the Palestinians and their struggle was evident. The
choir sang a refined repertoire of Arab music and Christian church
music and ended with the song "Jerusalem" by Lebanese singer Fairuz,
in which she integrated the calls of the muezzin and passages of
Christian prayer with great virtuosity.

All eyes were on Hania Soudah-Sabbara, the conductor of the
Palestinian choir. "I hope that next year, we will all be able to
hold the festival in Jerusalem, that you will all be able to come
to us," she said. "Jerusalem is yours just as it is mine. That is my
prayer." And many had tears in their eyes.

"This is a short event, but the idea and the vision behind it are
great: to bring together, for the first time, musicians and ensembles
from the Arab world who have never heard one another," said Shireen
Abu Khader. "This is a workshop for singing, but it is more than that
– it is building a community infrastructure and making peace. Music
can express our most hidden emotions, and through it, and through
the connection that has been formed among us, we will be able to make
this come true."

Armenia-Turkey Football Match Ends in 0-2

ARMENIA-TURKEY FOOTBALL MATCH ENDS IN 0-2

YE REVAN, SEPTEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN. The World Cup qualifying match
between national teams of Armenia and Turkey ended in 0-2. Turkish
football player Tuncay Sanli scored the first goal in the 15th minute
of the second half. Semih Senturk scored in the 78th minute. At the
conclusion of the game Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan congratuled
his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul on the win of the Turkish team.

A. Gul returned to Turkey immediately after the end of the match.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=117118

Aznavour’s Great Interest About Sargsyan’s Invite of Gul to Yerevan

CHARLES AZNAVOUR LEARNS WITH GREAT INTEREST ABOUT ARMENIAN PRESIDENT’S
DECISION TO INVITE PRESIDENT OF TURKEY TO YEREVAN

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN. The world-famous singer Charles
Aznavour received "with great interest" Armenian President Serzh
Sargsyan’s decision to invite Turkish President Abdullah Gul to attend
a match of Armenian and Turkish football teams in Yerevan. The text of
his letter to S. Sargsyan was submitted to Noyan Tapan by the RA
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The letter in particular reads: "It was
with great interest that I learned about your initiative to invite
Turkish President Abdullah Gul to Yerevan in order to attend an
Armenia-Turkey qualifying match of the 2010 World Cup. It was also
pleasant for me to be informed that your Turkish counterpart accepted
your invitation. I hope that your meeting will record a step forward in
the regulation of the relations between the two countries.

At this important moment I would like to be next to you, Mr. President,
but sudden sharp pains in the spine prevented me from leaving for
Armenia. Nevertheless, Mr. President, I am with you both in my mind and
soul.

Wishing you success in your high mission in the interests of Armenia
and the Armenians, I ask you to accept the assurance of my deep
respect."

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=117120

ANKARA: Turkish pres invites Sargsyan to return game in Turkey

Hürriyet, Turkey
Sept 6 2008

Turkish pres invites Sargsyan to return game in Turkey

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan Saturday he had been invited by his
Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul to attend a return football match
between the two nations in Turkey next year. (UPDATED)

"Today the president of Turkey invited me for a reciprocal visit to
Turkey to watch the next match. I think this is a good start,"
Sarkisian said at a joint press conference, without specifying whether
he would attend the game.

Turkey is due to play Armenia in a World Cup qualifier in Turkey on
October 14, 2009.

TIME: Can Soccer Heal Turkey-Armenia Rift?

TIME Magazine
Sept 5 2008

Can Soccer Heal Turkey-Armenia Rift?

Friday, Sep. 05, 2008 By ANDREW PURVIS

Soccer’s world governing body FIFA pays no heed to historical enmities
or geopolitical feuds in the draw for the World Cup qualifying
tournament; only seedings count. That’s how South Korea ended up
facing the diplomatically sensitive challenge of having to beat North
Korea in order to secure one of the 32 places at World Cup 2010 in
South Africa. Even more potentially volatile was the May 31 match-up
between Sudan and Chad ‘ FIFA postponed that one indefinitely, because
the two countries were on the brink of war. (A World Cup qualifier in
which El Salvador beat Honduras in 1969 saw long-running tensions
erupt into a brief war.) But many in Turkey and Armenia are seeing
their national teams’ World Cup encounter in Yerevan on Saturday as an
opportunity to help thaw the troubled relationship between the two
countries.

Among the fans taking their seats for the game in the Armenian capital
will be Turkey’s President Abdullah Gul and his Armenian counterpart,
Serzh Sarkisian. Gul’s visit is the first ever by a Turkish head of
state to Armenia, and it is being heralded as a potential breakthrough
in efforts to normalize relations between the traditional
adversaries. Their common border was sealed in 1993 as the two
countries found themselves supporting opposite sides in the conflict
between Azerbaijan and its breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, and
they have never enjoyed diplomatic relations.

France, which holds the presidency of the European Union, is welcoming
the visit as "historic and highly symbolic," and as a "strong and
encouraging sign" for relations between the two countries. Gul’s
office said in a statement that the visit "will be an opportunity to
overcome obstacles and prepare a new ground to bring the two people
together." Armenia’s President Sarkisian told his country’s diplomats
this week that "without forgetting the past, we must look to the
future." He added, "If there is a dialogue, we can discuss any, even
the most difficult questions. We must shape a mutually beneficial
agenda and begin contacts without preconditions."

But political analysts say that while the visit may be historic, it is
at best only a first step. Both countries have been seeking ways to re
establish normal relations at least since Sarkisian was elected
earlier this year, but obstacles include the ongoing dispute over
Armenian occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh, claimed by Azerbaijan with
Turkey’s backing. And then there’s the long-standing tension over
Turkey’s refusal to call the deaths of hundreds of thousands of
Armenians at the hands of Ottoman Turks during the First World War a
genocide.

"What we are seeing is some prospect of the de-escalation of conflict
between the two peoples, but it’s not going to be easy," says former
U.S. ambassador to Turkey Mark Parris, currently a scholar at the
Brookings Institution. "Both capitals have wanted to find a solution
for some time, but third parties ‘ including Azerbaijan, in the case
of Turkey, and the Armenian diaspora, in the case of Yerevan ‘ have
militated against one."

Gul is expected to spend only a few hours in the Armenian capital, but
his aides say that on the sidelines of the soccer match, the
Presidents will discuss a Turkish proposal to establish a new regional
"platform" to facilitate conflict resolution and strengthen economic
ties among Turkey, Armenia, Georgia, Russia and Azerbaijan. They may
also discuss a proposal to set up a commission of unbiased historians
to examine the murders of Armenians in 1915.

Adding urgency to the current discussions is the Russian invasion of
Georgia, which has raised fears not just in Turkey but also in the
West that instability in the region could interrupt energy supplies
from the Caspian through Turkey to Western consumers. Ankara hopes its
proposed "platform" would help reduce regional tensions.

Armenia is particularly eager to find a way to reopen its border with
Turkey, because it is currently forced to conduct its international
trade via Georgia’s Black Sea ports. That corridor has been squeezed
by the Russian military action in Georgia; a key railway bridge was
mined and the port of Poti remains occupied by Russian troops.

Still, nationalist elements in both countries are opposed to any kind
of rapprochement. Deniz Baykal, leader of Turkey’s Republican People’s
party, said he would prefer to see President Gul attend a match in
Baku instead. Devlet Bahceli, leader of the Nationalist Action party,
said it was a mistake to travel to Yerevan before Turkey and Armenia
had solved their problems.

Domestic political opposition may limit the room for maneuver of
Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) but its Armenian
initiative is part of the party’s broader strategic framework of "zero
problem with the neighbors," and includes diplomatic efforts in
countries such as Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Iran.

Saturday will not be the first time that the two countries have
clashed on the soccer field. In July, a youth match saw Armenia win 2
-1. But Turkey’s senior national side is currently ranked tenth in the
world, and it would be a major upset for 98th-ranked Armenia to
prevail. While Turkey is a soccer-mad nation (some 5,000 fans are
traveling to the match on special visas issued by the Armenian
government ) organizers are hoping that the two sides will keep their
passions on the pitch. As for embracing the opposing side after the
match, all eyes are likely to be on the presidential box. The
presidents, in this case, will lead the way.

,859 9,1839199,00.html

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0

Turkish President’s Historic Visit To Armenia Sharply Criticised

TURKISH PRESIDENT’S HISTORIC VISIT TO ARMENIA SHARPLY CRITICISED

Focus News
Sept 4 2008
Bulgaria

Ankara. President Abdullah Gul on Saturday becomes Turkey’s first head
of state to visit Armenia, but his bid to ease decades of hostility
over massacres under the Ottoman empire angered Turkish nationalists,
AFP informed.

Gul will go to Yerevan to attend a football match between the two
countries, which do not have diplomatic relations and remain deeply
divided over Armenia’s international campaign to have the massacres
classified as "genocide".

"A visit around this match can create a new climate of friendship in
the region," the Turkish presidency said in a statement.

"It’s with this in mind that the president has accepted the
invitation."

The two countries will face off in a qualifying match for the 2010
World Cup finals and Armenia’s President Serge Sarkisian invited Gul
last month to attend.

Cheney: U.S. To Help Keep Energy Flowing In Caucasus

CHENEY: U.S. TO HELP KEEP ENERGY FLOWING IN CAUCASUS

Houston Chronicle

Sept 3 2008
TX

Vice President Dick Cheney said the U.S. will work with countries in
the Caucasus region to develop additional routes for energy exports
to promote energy security, which is becoming an "increasingly urgent"
issue.

Energy users and producers are best served when "energy export routes
are diverse and reliable," Cheney told reporters in Baku, Azerbaijan,
after a meeting with President Ilham Aliyev at the presidential summer
palace. He said the U.S. will cooperate with Turkey and Caucasus states
"on additional routes for energy exports that ensure the free flow
of resources."

Azerbaijan is the first of three stops Cheney is making on a mission
ordered by President George W. Bush to reinforce alliances and reassure
leaders in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Ukraine of U.S. support and its
interest in the security and stability of the region.

The U.S. is assessing possible sanctions against Russia for its
military incursion into Georgia and recognition of two separatist
Georgian regions last month. More broadly, energy supplies may be at
risk in the region, and Azerbaijan is the starting point for the flow
of Caspian oil and gas westward to Europe.

"We both seek greater stability and security and cooperation in this
vital region of the world," Cheney said. Aliyev said he hopes for a
"strengthening of security measures" with the U.S.

The European Union on Sept. 1 suspended talks on a new Partnership and
Cooperation Agreement, the fundamental document defining EU-Russian
ties, while shying away from tougher measures that would expose the
energy-dependent EU to Russian retaliation.

No EU leader called openly for sanctions, a sign of Europe’s
dependence on Russian energy. Russia delivers over 40 percent of
Europe’s gas imports, a figure that will rise to 60 percent in 2030,
the European Commission says. A third of Europe’s imported oil now
comes from Russia.

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev welcomed the "sensible, realistic
point of view" that he said prevailed at the EU’s emergency summit.

Cheney, reflecting U.S. and European strategic interests in the region,
within hours of arrival in Azerbaijan began private talks on energy. He
met with William Schrader, president of BP’s Azerbaijan venture, and
Robert Dastmalchi, Chevron’s Azerbaijan country manager, according
to the vice president’s office.

A spokeswoman for BP in Baku declined to comment on the talks when
contacted by Bloomberg News. Chevron could not be reached for comment
this evening.

The U.S. has been urging Europe to diversify its energy shipments
from the Caspian region to enhance its energy security.

BP Plc’s Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, which bypasses Russia, can carry
as much as 1 million barrels of Azeri crude a day through Georgia to
Turkey’s Mediterranean coast. Tankers at the port of Ceyhan began
loading oil from the pipeline on Aug. 26, three weeks after a fire
on a section in Turkey forced its closure.

Another BP-led pipeline, the Baku-Supsa, transports crude from
Azerbaijan to Georgia’s Black Sea coast. BP said Tuesday that the
pipeline, which has a daily capacity of about 100,000 barrels, is
"undamaged" and closed because of security concerns.

The planned Nabucco pipeline, backed by the EU, will bring gas from
the Caspian region via Turkey to Austria and western Europe by 2013.

Cheney also is consulting with the Azeri, Georgian and Ukrainian
leaders on possible sanctions against Russia for its military
operations in Georgia and recognition of the breakaway regions of
South Ossetia and Abkhazia on Aug. 26. Nicaragua became the second
country to recognize South Ossetia, President Daniel Ortega said in
a speech Tuesday.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Tuesday that Cheney isn’t
likely to make any decisions and will instead report to Bush upon
his return to Washington on Sept. 10.

"I don’t expect any announcements from the vice president on this
trip," Perino said.

The conflict over South Ossetia solidified Azerbaijan as a regional
energy giant, U.S. Senator Richard Lugar said after visiting Aliyev
last month.

Aliyev is up for reelection this fall and may be striving to balance
relations with the U.S. and Russia during a time of oil wealth for
his country. Russia has also been concerned about Azerbaijan’s growing
ties with the West.

Azerbaijan has avoided making harsh statements condemning Russia over
its military actions in Georgia, in part because of its long-running
dispute with Armenia over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh.

The region’s mainly ethnic Armenian population declared self-rule
in 1991, sparking a three-year war between that killed an estimated
30,000 people and drove about 1 million people from their homes. A
cease-fire was declared in 1994 and the Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe still mediates in the dispute.

www.bloomberg.com