George’s Triumph: US President Received Hero’s Welcome in Georgia

Kommersant, Russia
May 11 2005

The George’s Triumph : US President Received Hero’s Welcome in Georgia

Yesterday George Bush finished his visit to Georgia. This trip might
become the main international triumph of President Bush. The
President was greeted by 150,000 cheering people gathered in
Tbilisi’s Freedom Square.

The Long-Awaited Guest

American presidents were called in Georgia many times. Eduard
Shevarnadze was hoping to see one in Tbilisi. Mikhail Saakashvili was
even more persistent trying to persuade a US president to come to his
country. The first information about a possible visit by Bush in
Georgia appeared about month ago. And at that time, the Georgian
president press-secretary Alana Gagloeva categorically denied it. The
Georgian authorities didn’t believe that first visit to the country
by an American president would come true.

To prepare for the Bush visit, there was a special staff created. It
was managed by the head of Saakashvili’s administration. The total
cost of the visit was about $100,000. In the hurry, the center of the
city was cleaned, the buildings painted and the avenues were
decorated. Of course, security was also a priority. A special group
from the FBI and Secret Service arrived in Georgia in early April.
They were checking on the smallest details of the trip itinerary. A
false rumor was intentionally spread that the president would be
staying in the Sheraton in the Old City. However, in reality it was
planned that Mr. and Mrs. Bush will stay in Sheraton on the Rustaveli
Avenue.

Right before the high guest’s visit, Georgian law enforcement found
in the shed of one of the streets close to Freedom Square a Rocket
Propelled Grenade “Mukha”. The president was supposed to be speaking
on the Square. Though, after an investigation, authorities
established that the RPG was left in the shed since the civil war
several years ago.

On Monday, all four Georgian TV stations were doing live reports of
US Air force One landing in Tbilisi airport. Georgian President
Saakashvili and his wife, Sandra Rulovs, the Parlaiment Speaker Nino
Burdjanadze and prime-minister Zurab Nogaideli met George and Laura
Bush in the airfield.

Right from the airport the cortege with the presidents went to the
Old City, where the best Georgian folk dancers gave a special
performance for the heads of states. Bush was definitely impressed.
He even tried once to join the dancers.

Then, Mr. and Mrs. Bush had to try Georgian cuisine in the restaurant
“Gorgasali.” One day before the visit, Secret Service agents from the
Bush entourage visited the restaurant and told the Georgian side,
that during non-official meals, the American president eats only food
that is brought with him from the US. The Georgians were so
frustrated and angered by this fact that the Secret Service had to
give up and let the president try Georgian specialties. The rare
special wine Shavnabada was awaiting the American leader. But Bush
refused to drink and didn’t touch the wine. When leaving restaurant,
the US President was praising the Georgian chefs. His favorite dish
was khinkali – the pita with melted white cheese. He was so impressed
by the food that he almost started to dance when he encountered
another folk musical band at the restaurant exit.

Russian Interest

The official ceremony of the American president’s reception was
conducted in the yard of the Georgian Parliament building. After
that, the two presidents went for a private talk. On the following
press conference, Bush said that he thanked president Saakashvili for
the warm reception. Then, he made several important statements. Bush
promised, for instance, that USA will help Georgia to reunite the
country by participating in conflict settlement with Abkhazia and
South Osetia. The US president also added that the Georgian president
can call him on the phone and ask for support.

According to Kommersant information, the original plans of the US
administration were more radical. It was planned during the visit to
have a peace summit with participation of Saakashvili and leaders of
unrecognized republics — Sergey Bagapsh of Abkhazia and Eduard
Kokoyta of South Ossetia. Though, Washington decided not to be
directly involved in the confrontation among Tbilisi, Sukhumi and
Tskhinvali. Bush limited himself by expressing support to
Saakashvili’s proposal to provide autonomy to both unrecognized
republics. The second important statement was made by Bush about the
closing of Russian military bases in Georgia. He said that Russia and
Georgia should continue to negotiate the terms of the withdrawal,
thus letting Tbilisi understand that he does not support Georgia’s
overly tough position in that problem.

Right before the V-E Day celebration Sergey Lavrov, Russian foreign
minister, and his Georgian counterpart Salome Zurabishvili had tense
negotiations in Moscow about the Russian military bases. They were
discussing the text of the declaration about the withdrawal of
Russian troops from Georgia. The Kremlin was hoping that Saakashvili
will come to Moscow to celebrate the 60th Anniversary of Victory
where he would sign together with Vladimir Putin the declaration.
However, Lavrov’s and Zurabishvili’s negotiation fell through and
Saakashvili refused to come.

According to Kommersant information, during the meeting in Moscow on
May 8 President Putin asked his American colleague to influence on
Saakashvili, so he would refuse from his tough stance on the
timetable of the Russian bases closure. And it looks like, judging by
his statements in Tbilisi, the US president accomplished this task.
That was probably the only good news for Moscow. The rest of the
results should alert the Russian government. The experts think that
Bush’s visit itself demonstrated American decisiveness to help
post-Soviet republics to leave Moscow’s control.

There was one more conflict situation in Georgia before Bush’s
arrival. The Georgian State Minister for Structural and Economic
Reforms Kakhi Bendukidze wanted to sell the strategic gas pipeline,
connecting the Russian pipeline network with Georgian and Armenian,
to Gazprom. The US was categorically against this deal and gave
Georgia tens of millions dollars to rehabilitate the pipeline.
Washington thought that the sale of the natural gas pipeline to
Gazprom might prevent the building project of the pipeline
Baku-Tbilisi-Erzrum.

To the City and To the World

The height of Bush’s visit to Tbilisi was the president’s speech on
Freedom Square, where he was met by 150,000 cheering Georgians.
Almost the same number of people went out in the Tbilisi streets
during the “Rose Revolution,” noticed Saakashvili.

The format of giving a speech to the foreign people was tried for a
first time two months ago in Slovakia. There, he spoke with
Bratislava residents. Only the late Pope John Paul II was talking to
foreign nations like that.

The George Bush speech in Bratislava was successful. But there was no
comparison with the Tbilisi speech.

The people started to gather on the square from 9 a.m., when the
speech was supposed to start only at 2 p.m. Thousands of people were
going through tens of metal detectors. Already by noon it was decided
that the Square was full and the police blocked the access. However
thousands of people kept coming. And head of the Bush Secret Service
decided to move the metal detectors to clear the way. The recent
Bush’s Bratislava speech was a bit spoiled by anti-American slogans
and posters. In Tbilisi, Bush did not meet opponents of America. The
opposition Labor Party was given a place on other side of Rustaveli
Avenue, where they held their own meeting.

President Saakashvili started his speech in a pretty pompous way. He
remembered, that “all great empires: Rome, Byzantium, Turks,
Persians, Mongols, Russians went to Tbilisi and to Georgia to
conquer.” And only George Bush –“the leader of great country came to
us to support our freedom and independence.” “After the “Rose
Revolution” no other country was standing so close to Georgia as
USA,” Saakashvili was screaming. After that, he promised to fight for
democracy all over the world together with Washington– like it was
in Ukraine, like it is now in Iraq.

Saakashvili remembered about Iraq on purpose. Washington admitted
that Georgia sent to Iraq more soldiers than some much larger
countries – NATO members. Right now there are 500 Georgian soldiers
and officers stationed in Iraq, but soon this number will be
increased up to 2,000. In the end of his speech, Saakashvili
announced that he is rewarding George Bush with the Order of
Saint-George “for support of freedom and democracy in Georgia, for
the president’s outstanding deeds in all post-Soviet space and Middle
East.” The American president has become the first recipient of the
Order. This reward was introduced only half a year ago and nobody
deserved it yet.

However, Bush, who is famous for his love to pompous speeches, easily
overshadowed his Georgian counterpart. His speech exceeded all the
expectations of Georgians. He gave high praises to the “Rose
Revolution” as a triumph of democracy and he called Georgia the
“lighthouse of the freedom” in post-Soviet space and all over the
world.

He started by saying greetings in Georgian – Gamarjoba. Than he
remembered about events in Tbilisi on April 9, 1989, when Soviet
troops dispersed peaceful a demonstration and dozens of people died
as a result. “Since that time, you continue to fight for freedom and
American people will be always with you.” George Bush announced the
Rose Revolution to be a mother of all revolutions `which inspired
many people.’ `Today from the Caucuses to Central Asia, people demand
freedom and they will get it,’ predicted the U.S. president. `You are
helping to free other people. Georgian soldiers right now are serving
in Afghanistan and Iraq, thus helping to free other people and
deserving gratitude from Americans and all allied countries.’

The square was exploding with applause. And George Bush continued to
compare Georgia and Iraq, speaking about the Rose Revolution with the
same words that he used to characterize the war in Iraq. `Spreading
freedom is spreading peace because free societies are peaceful
societies.’ In the end George Bush promised to help integrate the
republic into Europe. And he finished his speech in Georgian.
`Gaumardjos Sakartvelos’ (Long Live Georgia).

by Vladimir Novikov, Tbilisi; Mikhail Zyga

ANKARA: EU Constitution’s Future in the Hands of Turks?

Journal of Turkish Weekly
May 11 2005

EU Constitution’s Future in the Hands of Turks?

“There’s no correlation between Turkey’s membership and the EU
Constitution” French President Jacques Chirac explained on a live
television program, and he added that “Europe needs enlargement to be
strong and to expand the values of democracy and peace.” Efe Peker
from the Dominion reported.

The need for such clarification stems from pressures by the
right-wing anti-constitution movement and its placement of Turkey’s
pending EU membership at the centre of its campaign.
According to recent polls, 70 to 80 per cent of the French public is
suspicious of the EU’s decision in December 2004 to begin formal
negotiations with Turkey. This discontent may substantially affect
discussions of a draft EU Constitution. The opposition with the
Armenian lobby try to show the Constitution referendum as referendum
for Turkey’s EU membership.
Chirac warned: “I know all too well that there is also a temptation
to twist the referendum for political gain. The stakes involved in
the European constitution are national and European.”

Despite having promised that the issue of Turkey’s accession will be
left to a separate French referendum to be held in a decade at the
end of last year, it seems that Chirac could not prevent the
association of the EU Constitution to Turkey’s entrance into the
Union.

As campaigning on both sides of the Constitution debate intensifies,
French commentators are doubtful about whether the president’s `yes
campaign’ will be successful in increasing the 48 per cent to a
simple majority before May 29th.
`Turkey issue’ has been a crucial topic in French politics for the
recent years. The Armenian diaspora has a great role in these
debates. The Armenians in France who are mostly anti-Turkish and
biased about Turkey, have made anything possible to undermine
Turkey-France relations. Dr. Sedat Laciner from Ankara-based think
tank ISRO says `France’ Turkey politics has a boomerang effect. The
wrong policies now hit France itself. If Chirac fails in referendum
he should question his Turkish policies. He always neglected
relations with Turkey till 17 December and now pays the cost’.

Dr. Nilgun Gulcan, another Turkish expert, argues that Armenian
diaspora with anti-EU groups undermine France’s EU policies and
possible European leadership:

`There is a strong Armenian diaspora in France and they are abused by
the anti-European groups. They use the militant Armenians in order to
prevent a European federation. It is unfortunate that French leaders
preferred Armenia to Turkey in the past and neglected Turkish
friendship. There is a strong mistrust in Turkish and French peoples
now and French politicians have to accept that they are responsible
for that.’

ANKARA: The European Union And The Time To Settle Accounts

Turkish Press
May 9 2005

The European Union And The Time To Settle Accounts

BY FERAI TINC

HURRIYET- As we watch the celebrations held to mark Europe’s
liberation from Nazi occupation, I see that we look at this day as a
`matter concerning Europe.’ We view these events as if they are a
process taking place outside of us. However, even given the fact that
we didn’t take part in World War II, the reasons behind the conflict
as well as its outcome are also part of our history.

If half of Europe had not remained under Soviet occupation, could
Turkey have taken its present place on platforms weighing heavily on
Turkey’s integration with Europe? Would the Ankara agreement be
signed, which opens the door to Europe, and would Turkey be seen as a
partner of the European market?

Even if we didn’t enter World War II, the VE Day to be celebrated
with the participation of European leaders as well as those of the
United States and Russia is also a part of our history. If we grasp
this situation, it would help us understand our real role in all of
the discussions throughout the world.

As for Europe, it is going through an interesting period. The
discussions which it had left behind in the pages of history are
coming to life again. It has been said that condemning the Nazis is
not enough to stop genocide. Some say that both genocides in history
and genocides still being carried out must be condemned.

Another subject which should be borne in mind is May 8, the date when
Nazi Germany surrendered unconditionally, is not a liberation day for
all of Europe. This day was a liberation for some countries, but for
Germany and Eastern Europe it was the beginning of the Soviet
occupation.

This year, under the pressure of Germany and other European Union
leaders, the European Union Commission not only celebrated the
victory but also said that it was commemorating the innocent victims
of past clashes. This process also adds to the pressure on Turkey
about the Armenian issue.

Is settling accounts a threat for Europe? No it is not. We should
learn Europe’s methods too.

12 Armenian conscripts deserted the Akhaltsikhe 31st Infantry Battal

12 Armenian conscripts deserted the Akhaltsikhe 31st Infantry Battalion
JOHN C.K. DALY

United Press International
May 6 2005

UPI Intelligence Watch

When you say “draft dodgers,” most people think of U.S. youth opposed
to the war in Vietnam. Last Monday, however, 12 Armenian conscripts
deserted the Akhaltsikhe 31st Infantry Battalion of the Georgian
Ministry of Defense. The Armenian conscripts, all from Akhalkalaki,
had been called up for service in the Georgian army; they claim they
went AWOL because they were subjected to ethnically motivated abuse.
Georgia’s Defense Ministry has launched an investigation into the
circumstances surrounding the desertions from the 31st Infantry
Battalion; the battalion commander categorically denies the soldiers’
allegations. According to the battalion commander the draftees from
Akhalkalaki when originally called up were promised positions in the
border defense force but were sent instead to serve in Akhaltsikhe,
which is why they deserted. The draft dodgers, who returned to their
homes, have stated that they have no objections to serving in the
Georgian army but want to be posted to Akhalkalaki.

French Senators to visit Armenia in 2006

FRENCH SENATORS TO VISIT ARMENIA IN 2006

Pan Armenian News
03.05.2005 05:26

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Today Armenian Parliamentary Speaker Artur
Baghdasarian met with French Co-Chair of the Armenian-French
Friendship Group of the French Senate, Bourg-le-Valence city Mayor
Bernard Piras, reported the Press Service of the National Assembly
of Armenia. Armenian Co-Chair of the Armenia-France Parliamentary
Group Mher Shahgeldian was also present at the meeting. Bernard Piras
conveyed the regards of Senate President Christian Poncelet. In the
course of the meeting the parties discussed questions of strengthening
friendly ties and parliamentary relations between Armenia and France,
establishment of friendly relations between Armenian and French towns,
implementation of health, scientific and educational programs, as well
as prospects of promotion of the French language speaking in Armenia.
The friendly relations between Bourg-le-Valence and Armenian Talin
towns were mentioned. The Bourg-le-Valence administration intends
to implement specific programs in Talin aimed at the economic
development of the town. Artur Baghdasarian noted the importance of
the cooperation with Talin and implementation of specific programs
taking into account the hard social and economic situation. In his
turn, Mher Shahgeldian noted the importance of the efficient work of
the parliamentary group in strengthening interparliamentary relations,
inviting members of the Armenian-French Group of the French Senate
to Armenia. The visit will take place in 2006.

Production Volumes Of Kapan Mining and Processing Plant In FirstQuar

PRODUCTION VOLUMES OF KAPAN MINING AND PROCESSING PLANT IN
FIRST QUARTER OF 2005 FELL 38% TOTALING $1.7 MLN

YEREVAN, MAY 2. ARMINFO. The production volumes of Kapan mining and
processing plant in the first quarter of 2005 fell 38% as compared
to the same period of 2004 totaling $1.7 mln, Head of the Department
for Economy, Management of Nature and Ore-Mining Industry, Armenian
Ministry for trade and Economic Development, Artur Ashughyan told
ARMINFO’s correspondent.

He said that export in the period under review halved totaling 555 mln
AMD ($1.2 mln). The process of liquidation of the enterprise through
procedure of bankruptcy in November 2004 had a negative impact on the
production volumes, he said. The plant had $11 mln debts, including
to the government. In conformity with the effective legislation,
the owner of the plant had to recognize the plant a bankrupt and to
establish a new juridical entities on its basis “Deno Gold,” Ashughyan
said. He added that the plant was privatized in conditions of strikes
when the personnel were not receiving wages for months. 100% of Kapan
mining and processing plant were purchased in Dec 2002 by the DENO
company registered in Switzerland for $2,5 mln. In December 2004 the
plant’s owners paid $1 mln of the debt, he said. At present, DENO
company is negotiating with foreign banks to attract new investments
in the enterprise.

Neue Irritationen zwischen der =?UNKNOWN?Q?T=FCrkei?= und der Schwei

Neue Irritationen zwischen der Türkei und der Schweiz

SwissInfo, Deutsch
2 Mai 2005

ISTANBUL – Vorermittlungen der Schweizer Justiz gegen einen
prominenten türkischen Historiker wegen Leugnung eines Völkermordes
an den Armeniern haben neue Irritationen zwischen der Türkei und der
Schweiz ausgelöst.

Die Türkei bestellte den Schweizer Botschafter ein, um gegen
Ermittlungen der Staatsanwaltschaft in Winterthur zu protestieren.
Wie das Aussenministerium in Ankara gegenüber der Nachrichtenagentur
sda erklärte, wurde Botschafter Walter Gyger bereits in der
vergangenen Woche einbestellt.

Zugleich intervenierte die türkische Botschaft in Bern demnach bei
der Schweizer Regierung, um gegen die Ermittlungen zu protestieren.
Die Schweizer Behörden hätten sich äußerst kooperativ gezeigt, sagte
ein Sprecher des Aussenministeriums in Ankara.

Die türkische Regierung sei von der Stellungnahme der Schweizer
Botschaft in Ankara beruhigt, wonach es sich lediglich um
Vorermittlungen gegen den türkischen Historiker Yusuf Halacoglu
handle, kein Haftbefehl bestehe, und der Historiker weiterhin frei
reisen könne.

Für die weitere Entwicklung des Falles sei enge Zusammenarbeit
zwischen Bern und Ankara vereinbart worden, “um das Problem zu
lösen”, erklärte das türkische Aussenministerium. “Wir sind
zuversichtlich, dass sie es in den Griff bekommen”, sagte ein
Ministeriumssprecher. “Wir denken, dass es dort unter Kontrolle
gebracht wird.”

Zuvor hatten sowohl der türkische Aussenminister Abdullah Gül als
auch Historiker und führende Mitglieder der armenischen Gemeinde in
der Türkei in Stellungnahmen gegen die Vorermittlungen protestiert.

Die Schweizer Botschaft hatte zudem eine Meldung türkischer Medien
dementiert, wonach die Schweizer Justiz den Vorsitzenden der
Türkischen Gesellschaft für Geschichte mit internationalem Haftbefehl
von Interpol suchen lasse.

–Boundary_(ID_PvBGCZGWX5MVUmYLpUNR+g)–

Mothers’ laments for war

Mothers’ laments for war
By Darren Levin

Age , Australia
May 3 2005

Singing for life: a mother and her child in Lullabies Over Palm
Trees.

A celebration of mothers’ lullabies brings home the horrors of war,
writes Darren Levin.

It was Mother’s Day 2004, and Samia Mikhail – a survivor of war-torn
Lebanon – was glued to the conflict unfolding in Iraq. “I was
watching the war on TV here in Australia, and it re-created the same
feeling I had in Lebanon,” she says. “I wanted to stop it, but I
couldn’t, so I wrote this idea about mothers singing for their kids,
singing for life. It can be the most beautiful thing.”

Mikhail, 43, is artistic director of Lullabies Over Palm Trees, a
one-hour multimedia performance that juxtaposes footage of war with
women on screen and on stage singing to their children.

She spent five months with her husband, a digital artist, shooting
images in Syria, Lebanon, Dubai and Oman.

“There’s a lot of images of women who have lost their kids,” she
says. “I’m trying to make the presentation more artistic, to reduce
the ugliness of those images. I’m looking for a green area. These
mothers’ songs are green areas; they’re places of hope.”

Not all images, however, were confronting. In Syria, Mikhail
encountered an 80-year-old Palestinian woman who had more than 400
descendants.

Advertisement
Advertisement”She was telling me how independent she was,” recalls
Mikhail. “She still sells oil to the local community. During the
shoot, many of her relatives came up to kiss her hand.”

Mikhail says each region put their own cultural spin on the songs.
Syrian lullabies, for example, often take on political or historical
themes, such as the killing of Armenians in Eastern Turkey in the
early 1900s, while in Lebanon and Palestine, they sing about sexual
prowess.

“One lady was singing about her son’s sexual parts, that he’s going
to be a strong man sexually. She was singing about cooking and
feeding the whole neighbourhood because of his (fertility).”

Still, she says, lullabies are bound by a two things: “good wishes”
and a “lot of hope”.

“Lullabies are the wishes of mothers for their babies; they hold
female dreams of how life should develop.

“(They) express women’s desire for the continuity of life, and they
stand strongly against violence.”

Born in Lebanon, Mikhail, a mother of two, studied filmmaking in
Russia and has since directed a number of documentary films screened
on SBS, ABC and at international film festivals. She says the
performance carries a strong anti-war message. “It’s fighting against
something I don’t like,” she says. ” I choose humanistic subjects so
that people can connect.”

Lullabies
Where Incinerator Arts Complex, 180 Holmes Road, Moonee Ponds
When Friday and Saturday at 7.30pm
How much $15/10/5
Detials Tel: 8325 1750

Some for, some against

A1plus

| 13:45:48 | 30-04-2005 | Politics |

SOME FOR, SOME AGAINST

`Referendum as an important institute should be fixed in the Constitution’,
Armenian Justice Minister David Harutyunyan considers. In his opinion the
Constitution should also determine issues not subject to referendum, for
example the issues referring to taxes.

The Justice Minister does not support the idea of empowering the people with
the right to initiate a referendum. `If the issue is very important to the
people they can bring it to the National Assembly with the help of deputies
elected by them. There should be a filter in face of the President or the
National Assembly’, David Harutyunyan said.

ANKARA: MP: Some exploit ‘genocide’ issue to cripple Turkey’s EU bid

The New Anatolian
April 30 2005

Istanbul MP Elekdag: Some exploit ‘genocide’ issue to cripple
Turkey’s EU bid
The New Anatolian / Istanbul

Sukru Elekdag, Istanbul deputy for the main opposition Republican
People’s Party (CHP), said on Wednesday that the issue of the
so-called Armenian genocide is being used by other states to handicap
Turkey’s European Union membership, and to force Turkey to make
concessions.

Speaking at a conference entitled “The So-called Armenian Genocide
Claims and Responses” held at Bahcesehir University, Elekdag stated
that Armenia and the Armenian diaspora have been working hard to push
states to recognize their claims, and that, as a result, the
parliaments of 14 countries might push to recognize the so-called
genocide in the European Parliament.

Saying that Turks and Armenians have lived together in peace and
tolerance for 800 years, and that Armenians played key roles in the
Ottoman Army and administration, Elekdag said that Turks have never
harbored feelings of racial hatred.

He stated that the emigration law was enforced by the Ottoman Empire
during the withdrawal of Ottoman forces after the Sarikamis defeat to
secure their backs as they were threatened by Armenian guerillas. He
added, “If the Ottomans had chosen to force the Armenians to fight
against the invading Russians, they wouldn’t be accusing Turkey of
genocide.”