Mathew Bryza: The Issue of Karabakh’s Status Should be Settled by NK

MATHEW BRYZA: THE ISSUE OF KARABAKH’S STATUS SHOULD BE SETTLED BY NK PEOPLE

AZG Armenian Daily #145, 03/08/2006

Karabakh issue

During his Baku visit the US co-chair to the OSCE Minsk Group Matthew
Bryza met not only the country’s president and foreign minister but
also Nazim Bakhmanov, head of the so-called "Azerbaijani community
of Nagorno Karabakh." Commenting on this meeting the later voiced
complaint that Bryza had met the Karabakh Armenians. Moreover,
Bakhmanov thinks that Bryza brought no new suggestions.

Curiously enough the US co-chair voiced optimism about the dispute
being resolved in early 2007. This is in fact the first public
statement of the embarrassed US co-chair about the failure of the
"window of opportunity." Not to show pessimism concerning 2006, Matthew
Bryza meantime states that there is still possibility that Karabakh
issue still can be settled in 2006 thus paving a path for elections in
Armenia and Azerbaijan. According to RFE/RL, speaking to the leaders
of Armenia and Azerbaijan, the US co-chair underscored difficulties
connected with the issues of Kelbajar, Lachin and referendum. Still
in Bryza’s words the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs are sure that it
is up to the people of Nagorno Karabakh to determine the status of
the enclave. "But the question is who should be considered people
of Karabakh. There are also people who settled there after 1988 and
also want to take part in the referendum. All these issues need to
be worked out as a part of an extensive agreement package."

By Aghavni Harutyunian

U.S. Mediator Says Karabakh Peace Possible After 2006

Radio Liberty, Czech Republic
July 29 2006

U.S. Mediator Says Karabakh Peace Possible After 2006

By Emil Danielyan

Failure by Armenia and Azerbaijan to hammer out a framework peace
accord this year would not necessarily keep the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict unresolved in the immediate future, U.S. Deputy Assistant
Secretary of State Matthew Bryza said on Saturday. He insisted that
elections due in the two countries in 2007 and 2008 will not be an
insurmountable obstacle to a compromise solution.

`I think it’s possible to work through an election season and still
make progress,’ Bryza said in an exclusive interview with RFE/RL.
`It’s up to the [Armenian and Azerbaijani] presidents as to whether
or not they have enough good will and political courage to do so.
[Their failure to cut a deal in 2006] doesn’t have to be the end of
the process. It’s just easier, much easier, if we get the heavy
lifting done now.’

Bryza said he still hopes that Presidents Ilham Aliev and Robert
Kocharian will iron out their differences in the coming months on the
most recent peace proposals of the OSCE Minsk Group. `Of course I’m
still hopeful,’ he said. `If I weren’t hopeful, why would I even want
to put in an effort? This isn’t about theater, it’s about results.’

Bryza was speaking in Yerevan after what he described as
`encouraging’ talks with Kocharian that marked the start of his first
tour of the conflict zone since his appointment as U.S. co-chair of
the Minsk Group. He replaced another State Department official,
Steven Mann, in that position in early June following the failure of
Kocharian’s last face-to-face negotiations with Aliev that all but
dashed hopes for a near-term solution to the Karabakh dispute.

In two subsequent statements, the mediating group’s American, French
and Russian co-chairs indicated their frustration with the fiasco.
They said they will initiate no more Armenian-Azerbaijani talks until
the two sides display greater commitment to a lasting peace.

Bryza, who proceeded to the Karabakh capital Stepanakert later on
Saturday, said he is visiting the region to get `some more guidance
from the presidents themselves to determine how they would like to
take the process further.’ He said he was assured by Kocharian that
the Minsk Group plan is essentially acceptable to Yerevan.

`I enjoyed hearing his account of where things stand and how we got
here,’ he said. `I felt a constructive, candid attitude on his part.
He was very open. And he helped me think through what sort of
recommendations I might bring to my fellow co-chairs.’

Asked whether he found the kind of `political will’ for compromise
which was demanded by the mediators, Bryza replied: `I think there is
political will here definitely to keep the process going. There have
been public statements that the [Minsk Group’s proposed] framework,
the principles are agreeable [for Armenia].

`What’s never clear is whether or not there is enough will on both
sides to eliminate or to resolve the distance that still stands
between them. But I will just say I feel encouraged after today’s
discussions.’

Armenian officials have claimed implicitly that the two rounds of
negotiations between Kocharian and Aliev this year collapsed because
the latter backtracked on his earlier acceptance of the key
principles of the peace plan that were officially disclosed by the
Minsk Group co-chairs last month. Bryza effectively denied this and
was careful not to blame any of the parties for the deadlock, saying
that they both want to `enact some changes to the ideas that are on
the table.’

`The principles that are on the table don’t constitute an agreement,’
argued the U.S. administration official. `They are principles,
suggestions. So it’s not possible for anyone to walk away from an
agreement, if there isn’t an agreement.’

At the heart of those principles is the idea of holding a referendum
on Karabakh’s status after the liberation of most of the
Armenian-occupied districts in Azerbaijan proper surrounding the
disputed enclave. Bryza confirmed that the mediators believe the
status should be decided by the `people of Karabakh’ `But the
question is how do you define the people of Karabakh? And there were
residents there in 1988 who wish to participate,’ he added in a clear
reference to the region’s displaced Azerbaijani minority. `All these
things have still to be worked out as part of a broad package.’

Aliev and other Azerbaijani officials have repeatedly stated in
recent weeks that they will never accept any deal that could
legitimize Karabakh’s secession from Azerbaijan. Foreign Minister
Elmar Mammadyarov was quoted by the Day.az news service earlier this
week as indicating that Baku is only ready to let the Karabakh
Armenians decide the extent of their autonomy within Azerbaijan. `The
principle of self-determination does not mean a breach of territorial
integrity,’ Mammadyarov said.

This might explain why, unlike the authorities in Yerevan, the
leadership of the self-proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR) has
expressed serious misgivings about the proposed peace formula.

Bryza, who is apparently the most high-ranking U.S. official to ever
visit Karabakh, appeared to downplay the Stepanakert government’s
objections, implying that it is Baku and Yerevan that have final say
in the peace process. `It’s really up to Presidents Kocharian and
Aliev whether or not they will agree to the formula,’ he said. `We
are just waiting for a sign from the presidents as to whether or not
they would like to restart a formal process,’ he added.

Bryza, who is due in Baku on Sunday, also said he will meet the
group’s French and Russian co-chairs in Paris early next week to
brief them on the results of his shuttle diplomacy. The mediators
stressed in their recent statements that `now is the time’ to resolve
the Karabakh conflict.

Some of them warned earlier that failure to do so before the end of
this year would keep the peace process deadlocked for at least three
more years. They pointed to parliamentary and presidential elections
due in Armenia in 2007 and 2008 respectively and an Azerbaijani
presidential ballot scheduled for 2008. Many observers believe that
it will be even more difficult for each side to make painful
concessions to the other in the run-up to the polls.

But in an indication of the mediators’ fading hopes for 2006, Bryza
insisted that a Karabakh settlement will be feasible even during the
election period. `I don’t necessarily feel that there needs to be a
hard deadline on the peace process,’ he said. `It’s better if we have
a sense of what compromises might be suggested before other political
events [in Armenia and Azerbaijan] move forward. But it doesn’t have
to be by the end of this year.’

`I would argue that the elections in Armenia and Azerbaijan don’t
pose an obstacle to reaching an agreement,’ continued the U.S.
mediator. `They just pose an additional complicating factor. It’s up
to the presidents to guide their populations or societies, their
voters in whatever direction they wish: a) to win the vote for
themselves and their political parties, but b) to build support for
the agreement.

`If the presidents succeed, with our help as mediators, in finalizing
and eliminating the final differences with regard to this framework
agreement and if they come up with an agreement that’s mutually
acceptable, that should be a plus in an election. That’s a huge
achievement that should actually help political leaders and their
parties to win votes. So it could be useful to have elections. The is
question is, though, will the presidents have decided to take these
tough decisions in time?’

NATO Information Center to Open in Yerevan in October

PanARMENIAN.Net

NATO Information Center to Open in Yerevan in October
29.07.2006 14:03 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ In early October a NATO information center will open
in Yerevan with the assistance of the Armenian Atlantic Association,
International Center for Human Development and European Integration
NGO.

The Information Center will acquaint the society with Armenia’s
Individual Partnership Action Plan (IPAP) with the NATO, other
cooperation programs between the Alliance and Armenia.

IMF Permanent Representative James McHugh completing mission in Arme

IMF Permanent Representative James McHugh completing mission in Armenia

ArmRadio.am
26.07.2006 15:47

RA Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan received today Permanent
Representative of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Armenia
James McHugh, who is completing his mission in our country. Information
and PR Department of the Government informs that the Prime Minister
positively assessed the cooperation between IMF and the Armenian
government during McHugh’s tenure in office, noting that the positive
outcomes of this cooperation for Armenia are apparent. According to
the Prime Minister, with joint efforts RA Government and IMF managed
to find solutions to a number of questions.

Mr. McHugh underlined that in the course of the last four years the
Government of Armenia managed to resolve a wide range of problems
and to register progress.

James McHugh introduced RA Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan to the
new IMF Representative to Armenia Mrs. Nienke A. Oomes, who has five
years of experience of working in the Fund.

The Prime Minister expressed the hope that the Government will continue
working equally successful with Mrs. Oomes and wished success to
Mr. McHugh in his future activity.

Documentary Film about Sea Expedition of "Cilicia" Vessel Ship to Be

DOCUMENTARY FILM ABOUT SEA EXPEDITION OF "CILICIA" VESSEL SHIP TO BE SHOWN IN MOSCOW

AZG Armenian Daily #139, 26/07/2006

Culture

The presentation of "Travel in Seven Seas" documentary film dedicated
to the sea expedition of "Cilicia" vessel ship will be shown on
August 1, 2006, within the framework of Armenia’s year in Russia,
in Moscow based "Rolland" movie-theatre. It’s worth mentioning that
the ship is an exact copy of the Armenian Middle Age ships belonging
to the Armenian Cilicia Kingdom. The vessel ship has already arrived
from the Great Britain to St. Petersbourg to continue its voyage down
the Russian rivers.

By Tamar Minasian

DM’s joining RPA not against law, Armenian PM states

DEFENSE MINISTER’S JOINING RPA NOT AGAINST LAW, ARMENIAN PM STATES

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
July 24, 2006

YEREVAN, July 24. /ARKA/. Armenian Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan
does not think that RA Minister of Defense Serge Sargsyan’s admission
to the Republican Party of Armenia (RPA) contradicts the Law "On
parties". "The post of Minister of Defense is a civil, not a military,
post, and, according to the Constitution, the Government is formed
of representatives of political parties," Margaryan told reporters.

Therefore, it is quite natural that Ministers sympathize with certain
parties or be included in party tickets, and seek government posts.

As to whether Serge Sargsyan’s appointment as Chairman of the
RPA Council will reduce Margaryan’s powers as RPA Chairman, the RA
Premier said that the functions of the persons holding the two posts
are clearly separated. "Council Chairman coordinates the Council’s
work as Vice-Chairman of the party," Margaryan said.

Margaryan does not think that after filling the post of RPA Council
Chairman Minister Sargsyan will become actual leader of the party.

The RPA has regulations and traditions, and an individual is unable
to dictate his will to several thousand members of the party, most of
them with a wide party experience, Margaryan said. The RPA Chairman
added that Serge Sargsyan’s relations with his and with the party give
no occasion for suppositions of this kind. According to Margaryan,
the RPA has long been cooperating with Serge Sargsyan, who, although
not an RPA member, ranked 2nd in the ticket in the 2003 parliamentary
elections. According to him, this cooperation is supposed to reach
the point of logical decision. "Serge Sargsyan succeeded in clearly
forming its relations with the RPA and was to fill a post adequate
to his potential," Margaryan said. P.T.

Igor Giorgadze: Fights for Georgia

IGOR GIORGADZE: FIGHTS FOR GEORGIA

Moscow News (Russia)
July 21, 2006

By Dmitry Starostin The Moscow News

The Georgian opposition leader has dreams of building another
Switzerland

The man that some Georgian politicians have compared to bin Laden,
whereas others see as the country’s future savior, has been on the
international wanted list for the past 11 years, moving frequently
between undisclosed countries abroad. The son of a Soviet KGB general,
Igor Giorgadze, in 1973, graduated from the KGB Higher School in Moscow
and was sent to work in Georgia. In 1980-81, he fought in the war waged
by the USSR in Afghanistan as part of the Kaskad special task unit. By
the time the Soviet Union disintegrated, he had reached the rank of KGB
lieutenant general. When Georgia’s first president, Zviad Gamsakhurdia,
was toppled, Giorgadze threw his support behind the Military Council
("triumvirate") that came to power in the country in March 1992. In
1993, Giorgadze was appointed Georgia’s state security minister. In
1995, Igor Giorgadze left the South Caucasus state after an alleged
assassination attempt on President Eduard Shevardnadze. The ruling
authorities accused him of masterminding the attack and charged him
with terrorism.

In 2001, Giorgadze’s supporters in Georgia formed an opposition party,
known since 2003 as Justice. It also serves as an umbrella group for
the Anti-Soros Movement and a charity foundation.

On May 23, 2006, Vladimir Kolesnikov (then-deputy prosecutor general
of the Russian Federation) said that Russia might grant Igor Giorgadze
political asylum. The Georgian Foreign Ministry immediately protested
the move.

An MN correspondent met with Igor Giorgadze in one of the FSU states.

You have denied any involvement in the assassination attempt on
President Eduard Shevardnadze on August 29, 1995? What happened on
that day?

A presidential election was set for November 1995. By that time, my
disagreements with Shevardnadze over Georgia’s future had come to a
head. April and May polls showed that I was far ahead of Shevardnadze,
as were Aslan Abashidze then-leader of the Georgia region of Adzharia
and Dzhumbert Patiashvili, a former secretary of the Central Committee
of the Communist Party of Georgia. I made it clear that as state
security minister

I would not allow ballot rigging.

An easy way out of that situation was to stage an assassination attempt
on Shevardnadze and then crack down on his political opponents. In its
wake, about 400 people were arrested. Not surprisingly, Shevardnadze
won the election.

Are the people who you say were involved in the act still alive?

Yes, they are.

Do you know who they are?

Shota Kviraya, then-interior minister, and people in charge of
Shevardnadze’s personal security.

There were 14 defendants and 365 witnesses in the 1997-98 trial of the
alleged masterminds and perpetrators of the assassination attempt. None
of them testified against me or produced any physical evidence.

You returned to politics in July 2001. Presumably, you managed to
convince a certain part of the Georgian business community that you
had good political potential.

Luckily, many Georgian businessmen immediately saw through the
"rose revolution." It was a travesty. Shevardnadze was hated so much
that had he appointed a successor (as Yeltsin had), he would have
been torn into pieces. About two years before the 2003 parliamentary
elections, the Saakashvili-Zhvania-Burdzhanadze troika was cast as an
opposition. As a matter of fact, they were Shevardnadze loyalists,
his followers. Many businessmen both in and outside of Georgia saw
that. And this is how I acquired money and support.

It was to a very large degree through the Russian media that we
managed to galvanize the Georgian population into action. (Georgian
television imposed a virtual news blackout on our activities.) Three
weeks ago, 1,500 party activists marched to the administrative border
with the Republic of Adzharia, to the checkpoint that Saakashvili had
solemnly bulldozed in May 2004. Georgian television showed footage
of the action for just three seconds and from an angle that showed
not more than 20 people.

What was the aim of the action?

There was only one demand: The present government must resign. Early
parliamentary and presidential elections should be held. Georgia
is continuing to slip into a dangerous confrontation with Abkhazia,
South Ossetia, and Russia.

The ruling authorities had not expected that. Nor did they expect
8,000 people to turn out at a protest rally in Tbilisi. The resistance
movement is gaining momentum.

So there is going to be a real revolution in Georgia – not a rose,
but nettle revolution.

There is a view in Russia that the older generation of Georgians tend
to favor rapprochement with Russia, whereas young people are looking
to the West.

This is a delusion. We have a very large proportion of young people
among our party members. Young people can see clearly the results
of confrontation with Russia. They can see that their parents, elder
brothers and sisters work hard all through the year to gather a good
harvest, but then are unable to sell it. The border with Russia has
been closed. The vast Russian market, sought after by the United
States and China, was abruptly closed by Saakashvili because he
suddenly decided that Russia was bad.

The confrontation with Russia was provoked by a group of people who
are still being paid by George Soros. We have the worst kind of a
puppet government in Georgia.

In February 2005, Georgian Prime Minister Zurab Zhvania died under
mysterious circumstances. Do you think it was an accident or an
assassination?

You can stop any Georgian in the street and he will tell you that it
was murder. The Zhvania family also knows this. Consider: Experts from
the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) came to the conclusion that
the concentration of gas in the apartment where Zhvania and regional
governor Raul Yusupov were found dead was insufficient for killing two
persons simultaneously. The FSB report was translated into Georgian
to mean exactly the opposite: The gas concentration had been lethal.

I was not surprised.

You have said that should you come to power, you could start an
effective negotiating process with the breakaway republics of Abkhazia
and South Ossetia. Meanwhile, some people in Abkhazia are saying:
"Better Saakashvili than Giorgadze. If Giorgadze becomes president,
Moscow will force us to come to terms with Tbilisi."

Abkhazia is heterogeneous, as is Georgia. Since there were people
in Georgia who started the war, so there are people in Abkhazia who
are thus far happy with the status quo. I do not want to criticize
or condemn them. Everyone has a right to uphold his own position.

I can only say that unlike the incumbent authorities, I and my
supporters are campaigning for the reunification of Georgia, not
territorial integrity. These are very different things. Saakashvili
and his team simply want to regain control of these territories by
force. Their main goal is to stick a Georgian state flag on the border
with Russia.

What is really important for me is that our Abkhaz and South Ossetian
brothers remember that there are Georgians who were opposed to this
war right from the start. It was not Georgia but its irresponsible
leadership that started a war against them. We cannot possibly
live in a state of constant war. All conflicts will be resolved one
way or another. Only we would like to take a shortcut to peace. We
recognize Russia’s status as a guarantor of security for the Abkhaz
and South Ossetians. This does not make us the Kremlin agents: We
are pro-Georgian politicians who want to use peaceful means to bring
back into the family fold ethnic groups that were deliberately pitted
against one another. If our party comes to power, we have incomparably
better chances of sitting down at the negotiating table with them
and settling the conflict. This is the central issue in the current
political standoff.

You said earlier that if the incumbent regime stays in power, Georgia’s
disintegration could go even further with Samtskhe-Dzhavakhetia
Armenians and Kvemo Kartli Azeris breaking away.

The people of Dzhavakhetia have repeatedly demanded an autonomy
status. They never did under the Soviet rule or under Gamsakhurdia or
under Shevardnadze. This means that all is not well in our state. And
even though the Azerbaijani authorities are attempting to pacify
Georgia’s ethnic Azeris, I do not rule out that they could also make
this demand.

But disintegration will also move along other lines. A group of U.S.
Senators who recently visited Georgia said there were no obstacles to
Georgia’s accession to NATO without Abkhazia or South Ossetia. Yet
there was no reaction from the Georgian ruling authorities because
they are relying on NATO tanks and combat aircraft to enforce control
over the restive territories. This is where our positions diverge.
You can return these territories, but it will not be a whole Georgia.
You will end up with another Palestine. But we want to build another
Switzerland.

What do you expect from Saakashvili’s visit to Washington?

I believe that the main subject of discussion between Saakashvili and
Bush will be the solution to the South Ossetian and Abkhaz conflicts.
I think that Saakashvili will ask for sanction to use force, but
intuition tells me that the United States will not give him its
blessing. Nevertheless, the Saakashvili team will attempt to escalate
the situation in the zone of the South-Ossetia/Georgia conflict. The
situation in Abkhazia is somewhat different. Abkhazia is no good for
a blitzkrieg, which is exactly what Georgia’s incumbent rulers want.

Do you maintain friendly or business-like relations with Aslan
Abashidze?

No. We had a meeting after he left Adzharia, and I understand that
he has quit politics for good.

Do you think you will become the next Georgian president?

This is a question to the Almighty. Only He knows. I will become
president if the people decide so. If I knew that someone was ready
today to steer Georgia in the right direction, I would be happy to walk
together with this person all the way and cede him the leadership.MN

BAKU: Azerbaijan to participate at special session of S. Caucasian P

Azerbaijan to participate at special session of South Caucasian Parliamentary Assembly

Source: Trend
19.07.2006

Author: J.Shahverdiyev

On July 21-22, the special session of the Parliamentary Assembly of the
South Caucasian countries will be held in London, PM Siyavush Novruzov,
head of the Azerbaijani delegation in South Caucasian PA and also
the deputy executive secretary of New Azerbaijan Party, told Trend.

The reason for the conducting of the special session is justified
through the absence of Armanian delegation at the previous session.
The Armenian delegation didn’t attend that session due to the
contradiction within the country. The special session will focus on
transferring the chairman authorities to Armenia. And Armenia will
present the action plan for the next six months.

Novruzov noted that the composition of Azerbaijani delegation for
the next session of South Caucasian PA hasn’t been defined yet. "The
composition will be appointed in he near future and we always actively
participate in discussions and the agenda, taking part in this special
session," he added.

NKR Foreign Minister: Achievement of Solutions Is Possible Only with

NKR FOREIGN MINISTER: ACHIEVEMENT OF SOLUTIONS IS POSSIBLE ONLY WITH
PARTICIPATION OF LEGALLY ELECTED AUTHORITIES OF THE NKR

STEPANAKERT, JULY 18, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. One may only
welcome a statement of the Great Eight countries on maintenance of
the intermediary efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group and on necessity
of co-ordination of the core principles of the conflict’s peaceful
resolution. Nagorno Karabakh has always come out in favor of peaceful
resolution of the problem and is ready to exert every effort to achieve
the agreement on establishing long-term peace in the region. Nagorno
Karabakh Republic Foreign Minister Georgy Petrossian said commenting
upon the statements of IA REGNUM, made during the summit of the Great
Eight countries in Saint Petersburg.

"Unfortunately, it is not everything that depends on the mediators.
Considering Azerbaijan’s extremely destructive position and its
unwillingness to be in any contact with Nagorno Karabakh it is
very difficult to find an acceptable and correct solution to date,"
G.Petrossian said.

"The President of the Russian Federation has fairly noted that Russia
is not going to impose any solutions on the parties to the conflict and
that the compromise must be reached by people. Taking into account
the Russian Federation’s readiness to become a guarantor of the
agreements’ fulfillment we remind once more that the achievement of
solutions directly concerning the future of our country and our people
is possible only with participation of representatives of legally
elected authorities of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic, the main and the
most suffered party to the conflict," NKR Foreign Minister emphasized.

Vardan Oskanyan off to Bosnia and Herzegovina

Vardan Oskanyan off to Bosnia and Herzegovina

ArmRadio.am
18.07.2006 11:05

RA Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian will depart for Sarajevo, where
he will meet with his counterpart Mladen IvaniÄ~G. A joint press
conference will follow the meeting. Later the same day, Minister
Oskanian will leave for Banja Luka to participate in the opening
ceremony of the Davis Cup tournament with participation of Armenian
national team.

On June 20, Minister Oskanian’s visit to the Common Institutions of
Bosnia and Herzegovina is scheduled, as well as meetings with Adnan
TerziÄ~G, Chairman of the Council of Ministers, representatives of
the Parliamentary Assembly, and the members of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Presidency

–Boundary_(ID_gAokfU1ZbLB szFZyy1tNJw)–