Session of CSTO Council of Foreign Ministers kicks off in Dushanbe: Armenia-Azerbaijan border crisis also on agenda

Save

Share

 11:09,

DUSHANBE, MAY 19, ARMENPRESS. The session of the CSTO Council of Foreign Ministers kicked off today in Dushanbe, Tajikistan.

The session is taking place in a narrow format, Armenian foreign ministry spokeswoman Anna Naghdalyan reported on social media.

According to the session agenda, the CSTO Foreign Ministers will also discuss the current situation on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

The CSTO Council of Foreign Ministers is holding the first offline session since the start of the coronavirus pandemic.

The Russian, Armenian, Belarusian, Kazakh, Kyrgyz and Tajik foreign ministers will discuss the international situation and its development prospects, as well as its possible impact on the security of the CSTO member states. They will also discuss the Israeli-Palestinian crisis and the recent border tension between Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Armenian army stopped two more provocations, says Defense Ministry

MediaMax, Armenia

Yerevan /Mediamax/. Armenian Ministry of Defense today has reported that the Azerbaijani armed forces “carried out two more provocations against the sovereign territory of the Republic of Armenia, trying to make positional advances in the border areas of Vardenis and Sisian.”

“In both cases, the Armenian Armed Forces took corresponding action and stopped the advances, demanding that the Azerbaijani troops leave immediately and return to their starting positions. 

The Defense Ministry of Armenia considers the actions undertaken by Azerbaijan since May 12 to be an open provocation. To avoid unpredictable developments, the Defense Ministry urges the Azerbaijani troops to return to their starting positions immediately and refrain from attempts to encroach on the sovereign territory of the Republic of Armenia.”

The Most Righteous Thing Joe Biden Has Done as President

The Nation
April 28 2021

Ihave waited my entire life for an American president to speak a full measure of truth about the Armenian genocide.

On Saturday, Joe Biden did.

I’ve had my differences with Biden in the past, and I will surely have them in the future. But I will always remember that he put America on the right side of history when, on this year’s Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day, he used the word that his predecessors had eschewed.

Successive presidents of the United States, Democrats and Republicans, have issued statements on April 24, recognizing the Meds Yeghern, the great calamity, as Armenians historically have referred to the horrific events of more than a century ago. But they resisted using the term jurist and legal scholar Raphael Lemkin coined to describe this crime against humanity: genocide. They did not want to offend an American ally, the Turkish government, which has a long history of denying the mass murder of Armenians—and of pressuring other governments to do the same.

Biden ended the lie of omission.

“Each year on this day, we remember the lives of all those who died in the Ottoman-era Armenian genocide and recommit ourselves to preventing such an atrocity from ever again occurring,” the president said in a statement issued Saturday.

Beginning on April 24, 1915, with the arrest of Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople by Ottoman authorities, one and a half million Armenians were deported, massacred, or marched to their deaths in a campaign of extermination. We honor the victims of the Meds Yeghern so that the horrors of what happened are never lost to history. And we remember so that we remain ever-vigilant against the corrosive influence of hate in all its forms.

It is necessary to amplify the language of truth about this genocide and others throughout history because the language of denial is so insidious.

I learned that as a child. For me, there was never any question that the Armenian genocide was real, because I grew up with Armenians who had survived it—and who then made their way to a city of refuge in the middle of the United States.

I was born in that city: Racine, Wis. I came of age in the Racine County Courthouse, where my dad was an assistant district attorney. When I was a kid, he would take me to the courthouse with him each morning. I spent my days running around that remarkable building, hanging out in courtrooms and judicial chambers and clerk offices with Armaganians and Gulbankians and all the other Armenian Americans who became such a vital part of the city’s legal community.

For more than a century, Racine has been a place of incoming for Armenian immigrants and a home to their children and grandchildren. They built churches, formed clubs and community groups, opened stores and coffee shops, and became CEOs and doctors and lawyers. Yet they never forgot where they came from, or why they had to come to the United States. My father practiced law with a number of Armenian-Americans, including Vartak Gulbankian, who was born in the village of Talas, in what is now Turkey, on September 17, 1913. She arrived in the United States at the age of 6 with her parents, who settled in Racine. A remarkable woman, she graduated from high school at the age of 14 and, at the age of 21, graduated from the University of Wisconsin Law School as the only woman in the class of 1935. She went on to practice law for more than 50 years and was a proud member of the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups that placed an emphasis on civil rights and civil liberties.

Vartak Gulbankian and her fellow immigrants taught us the true history of the Armenian genocide, which began on April 24, 1915, when hundreds of Armenian intellectuals and community leaders were murdered by the Turks. With that, according to the International Association of Genocide Scholars, the “Young Turk government of the Ottoman Empire began a systematic genocide of its Armenian citizens—an unarmed Christian minority population. More than a million Armenians were exterminated through direct killing, starvation, torture, and forced death marches.” Henry Morgenthau Jr., the US ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, said at the time, “The great massacres and persecutions of the past seem almost insignificant when compared to the sufferings of the Armenian race in 1915.”

As a child, I learned to recognize the denial of the genocide as an assault on truth and memory that has extended across more than a century. There was never any question in my mind that Colin Tatz, the founding director of the Australian Institute for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, was right when he observed, “The Turkish denial [of the Armenian genocide] is probably the foremost example of historical perversion. With a mix of academic sophistication and diplomatic thuggery…the Turks have put both memory and history into reverse gear.” Stanley Cohen, the great professor of criminology at Hebrew University, said several decades ago, “The nearest successful example [of collective denial] in the modern era is the 80 years of official denial by successive Turkish governments of the 1915-17 genocide against the Armenians in which 1.5 million people lost their lives. This denial has been sustained by deliberate propaganda, lying and cover-ups, forging documents, suppression of archives, and bribing scholars.”

The denial has continued to the present day, so egregiously that when Pope Francis acknowledged the 100th anniversary of the genocide in 2015, The New York Times reported that the papal statement “caused a diplomatic uproar with Turkey,” which recalled its ambassador from the Vatican and condemned the pope’s reference to “genocide” as “baseless.” “Successive administrations have sought to skirt this question,” the Times noted, “because of Turkey’s growing importance as a NATO ally and as an influential political and economic power in the Middle East.”

Biden knew that the Turkish government would respond angrily to his use of the word “genocide,” and it has.

But the president chose to break the silence. In doing so, he acknowledged a bitter truth. “While Armenian immigrants have enriched the United States in countless ways,” he said, “they have never forgotten the tragic history that brought so many of their ancestors to our shores.” I understand there are more truths that this president must speak. I am not naive about how much of our own history must be reexamined and set right. And I am abundantly aware of the fact that acknowledging the truth is not the same as achieving justice for Armenians—or for other peoples who have been the targets of genocide.

On Saturday, though, I knew that Joe Biden had done something that mattered, something righteous.

I thought of Vartak Gulbankian when the president declared, “We honor their story. We see that pain. We affirm the history.”

I thought of how much that ACLU lawyer from Racine who so valued civil rights and human rights would have appreciated a president who said to the United States and the rest of the world,

Today, as we mourn what was lost, let us also turn our eyes to the future—toward the world that we wish to build for our children. A world unstained by the daily evils of bigotry and intolerance, where human rights are respected, and where all people are able to pursue their lives in dignity and security. Let us renew our shared resolve to prevent future atrocities from occurring anywhere in the world. And let us pursue healing and reconciliation for all the people of the world.

John NicholsJohn Nichols is a national affairs correspondent for The Nation and the author of the new book The Fight for the Soul of the Democratic Party: The Enduring Legacy of Henry Wallace’s Anti-Fascist, Anti-Racist Politics (Verso). He’s also the author of Horsemen of the Trumpocalypse: A Field Guide to the Most Dangerous People in America, from Nation Books, and co-author, with Robert W. McChesney, of People Get Ready: The Fight Against a Jobless Economy and a Citizenless Democracy.

Armenian President hosts French parliamentary delegation

Save

Share

 14:29,

YEREVAN, APRIL 29, ARMENPRESS. President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian received a French parliamentary delegation led by Guy Teissier, Vice-President of the French National Assembly’s Armenia-France Friendship Group and Chairman of the France-Artsakh Friendship Caucus, the President’s Office told Armenpress.

The delegation consists of Senator, Vice-President of the French Senate’s Armenia-France Friendship Group and Founding Member of the France-Artsakh Friendship Caucus Valérie Boyer, MPs Jacqueline Dubois, Francois Pupponi and Xavier Breton.

“I am glad for your visit to Armenia and Artsakh, and I am doubly happy and know that you are the good friends of Armenia”, the Armenian President said while welcoming the guests at the Presidential Palace.

Guy Teissier in turn stated that he and his colleagues have long been the friends of Armenia and Artsakh, and noted that their number could be much more because Armenia has many friends in France. He said the adoption of the resolutions by the French Senate and the National Assembly on the need to recognize the Republic of Artsakh is the outcome of their long fight.

Guy Teissier said during the recent war they were sharing the grief and sufferings of the Armenian people, because, he added, that France as well has seen many wars, passed through difficult trials and had millions of losses.

The French parliamentary delegation representatives presented their impressions from the visit to Artsakh. They highlighted talking about the war, its consequences, as well as raising awareness within the international community.

The French lawmakers said they will continue supporting and assisting Armenia and Artsakh.

The Armenian President thanked the French MPs for their activities and stated that the friendship of Armenia and France is multilayered as it covers the history, values, culture of the two peoples, individuals who have created and continue creating that history. According to President Sarkissian, in the 21st century, power, strength are connected with the development of modern technologies, education and science, therefore, he stressed the need for joint efforts aimed at making Armenia an advanced and strong country.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

So far Azerbaijan has failed to implement very important point of November 9 declaration – Pashinyan

Save

Share

 18:55,

YEREVAN, APRIL 29, ARMENPRESS.  Caretaker Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan again referred to the issue of the Armenian war prisoners in a meeting with Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin in Kazan. ARMENPRESS reports Pashinyan notes that so far Azerbaijan has failed to implement a very important point of the November 9 trilateral declaration.

”It’s about the return of POWs, hostages and other detainees. And I want to express gratitude for the efforts the Russian Federation makes to solve this issue”, Pashinyan said.

Armenian shepherd dragged and beaten by Azerbaijanis – Ombudsman

Public Radio of Armenia

The criminal attack of dragging and beating the Aravus village shepherd by Azerbaijani military servicemen confirms the urgent need for a security zone around Syunik, Armenia’s Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan says.

Immediately after this information, the Human Rights Defender of Armenia initiated fact-finding activities with the involvement of the Syunik subdivision of the Defender’s Staff.

The shepherd submitted alarming complaints to the Staff of the Human Rights Defender that he grazed 14 large and small cattle on a pasture about 500 meters from his house on 18 April 2021. Between 5 and 6 pm, when he was in the area about 50 meters away from the Azerbaijani positions, he was approached by three Azerbaijani armed servicemen.

According to the shepherd, the Azerbaijani military servicemen first threatened him with weapons, and then two of them pulled him and tried to take him to the trench in the direction of the Azerbaijani positions by force. The Azerbaijanis constantly cursed and threatened the man.

As Armenian servicemen rushed for help, the third Azerbaijani serviceman hit the shepherd in the eye, causing a bruise and immediately fled to their positions.

During the Human Rights Defender’s Office fact-finding activities, it was also established that the Azerbaijani military had shouted insults at the shepherd in the same place of the Aravus village, and at around 7 pm he received threats from Azerbaijani soldiers who were openly displaying firearms on 20 April 2021.

The staff of the Human Rights Defender also recorded the alarming interview of the head of Aravus village about the incident in mass media.

The head of the Aravus village informed the Human Rights Defender’s Office that there are houses in the villagers less than 500 meters away from the Azerbaijani positions (for example, 100 or 200 meters). This fact was also recorded by the Human Rights Defender’s Office monitoring conducted at the site.

The RA Human Rights Defender specifically states that the Azerbaijani servicemen committed a criminal attack on an Armenian border resident. This confirms the gross violations of the internationally recognized rights of the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, as well as the rights enshrined in the Constitution of Armenia.

These are rights to physical and psychological immunity; right to property and other vital rights.

This incident clearly substantiates the Human Rights Defender’s proposal on creating a security zone around Syunik province in order to guarantee rights of Armenian citizens.

There should be no Azerbaijani soldiers, signs or flags in the immediate vicinity of the Syunik villages and on the roads connecting the communities of the province, the Ombudsman says.

Armenia’s Human Rights Defender will send the information about these incidents to relevant international organizations, as well as will include it in the security zone concept.

Azerbaijani Press: Azerbaijan condemns the statement of the President of the United States of America on the occasion of Armenian Memorial Day.

Caspian News, Azerbaijan

By Nargiz Mammadli

Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev (R) and his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan in a meeting in Baku, Azerbaijan, December 10, 2020 / President.Az

Authorities of Azerbaijan condemned the recognition of the so-called “Armenian genocide” by U.S. President Joe Biden vowing to support Turkey’s stance on this issue.

President Ilham Aliyev held Saturday a phone call with his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan to voice Azerbaijan’s position with regard to the statement made by the U.S. leader. Noting that this decision was erroneous, President Aliyev called it a historic mistake. President Aliyev said Azerbaijan considered that statement unacceptable and was convinced that it significantly damaged the emerging cooperation trends in the region.

The Foreign Ministry of Azerbaijan issued a statement on the same day to call the statement an attempt that distorts the historical facts about the events of 1915.

“The events of 1915 should be studied by historians, not politicians. However, as it is known, Armenia, which wants to cover up the events and try to portray itself as an oppressed country, did not accept Turkey’s proposal to investigate the events of that period by a joint historical commission,” the ministry said in a statement. “The falsification of history, attempts to “rewrite history” and its use for political pressure are unacceptable.”

U.S. President Joe Biden classified on Saturday the alleged events of 1915 as “genocide.” “We remember the lives of all those who died in the Ottoman-era Armenian genocide,” he said.

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Chavushoglu said in a Twitter post that Ankara entirely rejected Biden’s statement that based “solely on populism.”

“Words cannot change or rewrite history. We have nothing to learn from anybody in our own past. Political opportunism is the greatest betrayal to peace and justice,” he said.

The Foreign Ministry of Turkey called on the U.S. president to correct this “grave mistake” and “to support the efforts aiming to establish a practice of peaceful coexistence in the region, especially among the Turkish and Armenian nations, instead of serving the agenda of those circles that try to foment enmity from history.”

Turkey accepts that some part of Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire died in clashes during the First World War but calls for an open investigation into the figures claimed by Armenia and denies that a deliberate systematic massacre against Armenians took place. Turkish authorities have repeatedly called for opening the archives jointly with Armenia, a proposal that was adamantly rejected by the Armenian government. Armenian sources claim 1.5 million deaths as a result of the massacres that allegedly took place during the reign of the Ottoman Empire in 1915. While the historical facts prove that the number of Armenians living in the Ottoman territories was quite fewer than the claimed figures.

President Erdogan said he honored the memory of the Armenians of the Ottoman state who died in the difficult conditions of the First World War and expressed his condolences to their grandchildren. The culture of exemplary coexistence of the Turkish and Armenian people should not be forgotten, he added. Erdogan said the attempts to politicize historical events would not help put pressure on Ankara noting that the principles of good neighborliness and mutual respect should be the basis for developing Turkey-Armenia ties.

“We, on different occasions, have always stated that we stand ready to enhance our relations with Armenia on the basis of good neighborhood and mutual respect. We renewed this call of ours loudly once again after the Karabakh crisis had been resolved. I reiterate the same call,” he said in a message to the patriarch of Armenians in Turkey, according to a statement published on the Turkish president’s website.

Gulf’s geopolitics twist and turn in new alignments

Asia Times
[Biden administration's regional rethink is helping to reshape
relations and dynamics in previously unimagined ways]
By MK Bhadrakumar
The geopolitical alignments of the Persian Gulf region are rapidly
transforming both in bilateral and multilateral formats.
Starting with the rapprochement between Qatar and Saudi Arabia in
January, the common thread is that the shift in the regional strategy
under US President Joe Biden has been critical one way or another.
The thaw discernible in Saudi-Turkish relations lately and the
dramatic meeting this month in Baghdad between the top security
officials of Saudi Arabia and Iran can be seen as “derivatives” of the
shift in the United States’ policies.
Anwar Gargash, advisor to Emirati President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed,
said last week that “the changing face of the Middle East” is to be
attributed to the Abraham Accords of last August, which he described
as “an alternative strategic view” aimed at bolstering regional
security. But such tall claims are not without an element of truth,
either.
Indeed, the historic transformation of relations between Israel and
the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has provided an anchor sheet for the
new unprecedented regional grouping that has appeared on the horizon
comprising four countries of the wider Eastern Mediterranean, West
Asia and the Persian Gulf – Greece, Cyrus, Israel and the UAE.
However, fundamentally, it is the shift in the locus of the United
States’ traditional regional Gulf security strategy away from the past
pattern – dividing the region into rival camps to fuel any antipathy
toward Iran and take advantage of it for advancing American interests
– that is already having a calming effect on the region.
Certainly, each of the recent trends in Gulf alignments also would
have specific features. Thus the “normalization” between Saudi Arabia
and Qatar was mostly due to Riyadh’s concerns about the incoming Biden
administration’s foreign policy.
Riyadh wants some goodwill with Biden in the context of the severe
damage to the image of Saudi Arabia – and specifically its Crown
Prince – in the eyes of many Democratic lawmakers in Washington.
The improved relations between Riyadh and Doha may not necessarily
lead to dense bilateral cooperation or breathe new life into the
moribund Gulf Cooperation Council, but it leads to more diplomacy,
and, therefore, fewer threats and acts of violence.
Interestingly, Ankara played a critical role in terms of giving Doha
the confidence to stand strong in the face of the Saudi blockade, but
the very prospect of Saudi-Qatari relations moving in a positive
direction also raises hope for Ankara that it can build a stronger
relationship with Riyadh without undermining the Turkish-Qatari
alliance.
Again, Qatar’s ability to bust the Saudi-led embargo indirectly
boosted Turkey’s regional standing as an increasingly influential
power. The Turkish-Qatari military base and the presence of Turkish
military personnel in the sieged Gulf Arab country no doubt
contributed to Qatar’s deterrence.
Most Western pundits made a hasty conclusion that Iran would be the
“loser” out of the Saudi-Qatari reconciliation. But they
underestimated the pragmatism of Gulf Arab states.
For although Tehran was a major beneficiary of the Gulf dispute when
it erupted three and a half years ago and the crisis offered Iran an
opportunity to bring its partnership with Qatar to new heights, the
warmth in the Iran-Qatar relationship has now become an enduring
feature of Gulf diplomacy.
Meanwhile, the signs are that the talks in Vienna to work out the
return of the US to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and
the lifting of Iran sanctions are progressing well.
This will prompt a further rethink in Riyadh, which may partly explain
the meeting in Baghdad on April 9 between Khalid bin Ali Al Humaidan,
chief of the Saudi General Intelligence Directorate, and General
Ismail Qaani, the head of the elite Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps.
Alas, this meeting could have been held much earlier but for
Washington undermining it with the assassination of Iranian general
Qasem Soleimani in January last year. Suffice to say, the Saudi
rethink on Iran is independent of the US strategies toward Iran. Now,
that gives reason for hope.
Of course, an easing of Saudi-Iranian tensions may not blossom
overnight into amity, as acute contradictions bedevil that
relationship. Nonetheless, a suspension of mutual hostility alone is
bound to improve the Gulf security situation.
Indeed, the trajectory of the US-Iranian engagement through the coming
one-year period is going to be decisive. For if the US sanctions are
lifted and Iran’s integration into the international community
accelerates, the West Asian landscape will change phenomenally.
Notwithstanding the locus of power in Iran after the coming
presidential election, there should be no doubt that Iran’s
willingness to be a factor of regional stability is genuine.
For a start, Iran never had any intentions to make a nuclear bomb.
Second, its priority does not lie in the projection of power in its
neighborhood but in the reconstruction of Iran’s economy, which has
been ravaged by decades of Western sanctions and isolation. As a
responsive regime, the domestic public expectation is to be taken
seriously.
Third, the Biden administration has resuscitated the Palestine file.
With all this, the scope for expanding the gyre of the Abraham Accords
in the Gulf region in an anti-Iran direction has shrunk. That partly
explains the “Look West” policy by Israel and the UAE to team up with
Greece and Cyprus to form a new regional security grouping.
The foreign-minister-level meeting of the four countries on Friday in
Paphos, on the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, can be seen in this
light.
The host, Cypriot Foreign Minister Nikos Christodoulides,
grandiloquently described the event as signifying a new era for the
region, driven by the common vision “of the wider Eastern
Mediterranean, Middle East, and Gulf as an area of stability,
prosperity and peace.”
He claimed that this new era will help dispel “the prevailing,
restrictive narrative of our neighborhood as a region of turmoil,
conflict and crisis” and unfold a “radically different” one with a
positive and inclusive agenda that will promote “cooperation, peace,
stability and prosperity.”
Quintessentially, however, the four participants hope to acquire
strategic depth in the pursuit of their shared antagonism toward
Turkey by pooling their resources and strengthening all-around mutual
cooperation.
On Sunday, Israel and Greece announced their biggest ever defense
procurement deal, which includes a US$1.65 billion contract for the
establishment and operation of a training center for the Hellenic Air
Force by Israeli defense contractor Elbit Systems over a 22-year
period.
The Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz has said, “I am certain that
[this program] will upgrade the capabilities and strengthen the
economies of Israel and Greece and thus the partnership between our
two countries will deepen on the defense, economic and political
levels.”
Meanwhile, the UAE and Greece too have a significant defense
cooperation program. Greece plans to acquire 40 fighter aircraft
inclusive of French Rafales and US-made F-35 stealth fighter jets. The
Biden administration has reportedly cleared the sale of 50 F-35s to
the UAE.
Clearly, Greek, Israeli and Emirati interests are converging on
containment of Turkey’s vaulting ambitions of regional dominance, with
which Cyprus also is in agreement. Importantly, it also enjoys US
backing.
But, significantly, Saudi Arabia and Egypt have kept out of the
four-nation grouping and are instead prioritizing the stabilization of
their relationship with Turkey.
Israel anticipates that the momentum toward the US-Iranian engagement
is becoming unstoppable and any new Gulf security paradigm would
inevitably visualize Iran’s inclusion. Israel needs to think hard and
fast as the Iran bogey has outlived its utility. Clearly, Iran’s
anti-Zionist policies never really added up to “anti-Semitism,”
either.
There must be a way forward to put aside the sword and take up the
plowshare to turn the loosened soil.
 

Armenia’s security system based on strategic, military-political alliance with Russia – Pashinyan

Armenia’s security system based on strategic, military-political alliance with Russia – Pashinyan

Save

Share

 15:05,

YEREVAN, APRIL 17, ARMENPRESS. The security system of the Republic of Armenia is based on the Armenian-Russian strategic-military-political alliance, ARMENPRESS reports Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan said during the meeting with the citizens in Rind community within the framework of his visit to Vayots Dzor region.

“They say, how are we going to protect the security of our country?’ The security system of our country is based on the Armenian-Russian strategic and military-political alliance. For purely security reasons, we have a joint military group with Russia, a joint air defense system in the Caucasus region. And the logic of those agreements is the following: an attack on Armenia means an attack on Russia. And we have a common security system here,” Pashinyan said.

Answering the questions why that system did not work the way the people wanted during the Artsakh war, the Prime Minister answered that there was a simple reason for that. He stressed that, in fact, this security system extends to the borders of Armenia, which Armenia itself has defined by the 2010 Law on Administrative Territorial Division.

Demonstrating atrocities, Aliyev challenged the entire civilized world –Parliament Deputy Speaker

Save

Share

 17:57, 13 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 13, ARMENPRESS.  Deputy President of the National Assembly of Armenia, member of ‘’My step’’ bloc Lena Nazaryan thinks that by opening a ‘’park’’ in Baku and demonstrating atrocities and murders there, Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliyev has challenged the entire civilized world, ARMENPRESS reports Lena Nazaryan announced at the parliament.

‘’I am confident that our state, our children and their generations will live much longer and happier in this region than Aliyev and his fascist, xenophobic, criminal regime will be able to survive. By demonstrating the atrocities of murder to his people and the entire world, Aliyev has challenged the entire civilized world, where usually parks and museums dedicated to the memories of victims of wars and genocides are opened, but not parks dedicated to barbarism’’, she said.

‘’Aliyev showed the entire world how he killed people, and we must show how we will win fascism in our region, where we live and will continue to live. Peace must be to all the nations in this region, against Aliyev’s wishes, or what will be better, without Aliyev’’, Nazaryan concluded.

A so-called “exhibition-park” related to the September-November 2020 war was opened in Baku on April 12, 2021.

In the “park”, along with the Armenian military equipment, mannequins of the Armenian military servicemen have been displayed, all of which presented in a degrading manner, in a manner violating human dignity. This is done to ensure the widest possible publicity.