Gulf’s geopolitics twist and turn in new alignments

Asia Times



[Biden administration's regional rethink is helping to reshape
relations and dynamics in previously unimagined ways]

By MK Bhadrakumar


The geopolitical alignments of the Persian Gulf region are rapidly
transforming both in bilateral and multilateral formats.

Starting with the rapprochement between Qatar and Saudi Arabia in
January, the common thread is that the shift in the regional strategy
under US President Joe Biden has been critical one way or another.

The thaw discernible in Saudi-Turkish relations lately and the
dramatic meeting this month in Baghdad between the top security
officials of Saudi Arabia and Iran can be seen as “derivatives” of the
shift in the United States’ policies.

Anwar Gargash, advisor to Emirati President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed,
said last week that “the changing face of the Middle East” is to be
attributed to the Abraham Accords of last August, which he described
as “an alternative strategic view” aimed at bolstering regional
security. But such tall claims are not without an element of truth,
either.

Indeed, the historic transformation of relations between Israel and
the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has provided an anchor sheet for the
new unprecedented regional grouping that has appeared on the horizon
comprising four countries of the wider Eastern Mediterranean, West
Asia and the Persian Gulf – Greece, Cyrus, Israel and the UAE.

However, fundamentally, it is the shift in the locus of the United
States’ traditional regional Gulf security strategy away from the past
pattern – dividing the region into rival camps to fuel any antipathy
toward Iran and take advantage of it for advancing American interests
– that is already having a calming effect on the region.

Certainly, each of the recent trends in Gulf alignments also would
have specific features. Thus the “normalization” between Saudi Arabia
and Qatar was mostly due to Riyadh’s concerns about the incoming Biden
administration’s foreign policy.

Riyadh wants some goodwill with Biden in the context of the severe
damage to the image of Saudi Arabia – and specifically its Crown
Prince – in the eyes of many Democratic lawmakers in Washington.

The improved relations between Riyadh and Doha may not necessarily
lead to dense bilateral cooperation or breathe new life into the
moribund Gulf Cooperation Council, but it leads to more diplomacy,
and, therefore, fewer threats and acts of violence.

Interestingly, Ankara played a critical role in terms of giving Doha
the confidence to stand strong in the face of the Saudi blockade, but
the very prospect of Saudi-Qatari relations moving in a positive
direction also raises hope for Ankara that it can build a stronger
relationship with Riyadh without undermining the Turkish-Qatari
alliance.

Again, Qatar’s ability to bust the Saudi-led embargo indirectly
boosted Turkey’s regional standing as an increasingly influential
power. The Turkish-Qatari military base and the presence of Turkish
military personnel in the sieged Gulf Arab country no doubt
contributed to Qatar’s deterrence.

Most Western pundits made a hasty conclusion that Iran would be the
“loser” out of the Saudi-Qatari reconciliation. But they
underestimated the pragmatism of Gulf Arab states.

For although Tehran was a major beneficiary of the Gulf dispute when
it erupted three and a half years ago and the crisis offered Iran an
opportunity to bring its partnership with Qatar to new heights, the
warmth in the Iran-Qatar relationship has now become an enduring
feature of Gulf diplomacy.

Meanwhile, the signs are that the talks in Vienna to work out the
return of the US to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and
the lifting of Iran sanctions are progressing well.

This will prompt a further rethink in Riyadh, which may partly explain
the meeting in Baghdad on April 9 between Khalid bin Ali Al Humaidan,
chief of the Saudi General Intelligence Directorate, and General
Ismail Qaani, the head of the elite Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps.

Alas, this meeting could have been held much earlier but for
Washington undermining it with the assassination of Iranian general
Qasem Soleimani in January last year. Suffice to say, the Saudi
rethink on Iran is independent of the US strategies toward Iran. Now,
that gives reason for hope.

Of course, an easing of Saudi-Iranian tensions may not blossom
overnight into amity, as acute contradictions bedevil that
relationship. Nonetheless, a suspension of mutual hostility alone is
bound to improve the Gulf security situation.

Indeed, the trajectory of the US-Iranian engagement through the coming
one-year period is going to be decisive. For if the US sanctions are
lifted and Iran’s integration into the international community
accelerates, the West Asian landscape will change phenomenally.

Notwithstanding the locus of power in Iran after the coming
presidential election, there should be no doubt that Iran’s
willingness to be a factor of regional stability is genuine.

For a start, Iran never had any intentions to make a nuclear bomb.
Second, its priority does not lie in the projection of power in its
neighborhood but in the reconstruction of Iran’s economy, which has
been ravaged by decades of Western sanctions and isolation. As a
responsive regime, the domestic public expectation is to be taken
seriously.

Third, the Biden administration has resuscitated the Palestine file.

With all this, the scope for expanding the gyre of the Abraham Accords
in the Gulf region in an anti-Iran direction has shrunk. That partly
explains the “Look West” policy by Israel and the UAE to team up with
Greece and Cyprus to form a new regional security grouping.

The foreign-minister-level meeting of the four countries on Friday in
Paphos, on the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, can be seen in this
light.

The host, Cypriot Foreign Minister Nikos Christodoulides,
grandiloquently described the event as signifying a new era for the
region, driven by the common vision “of the wider Eastern
Mediterranean, Middle East, and Gulf as an area of stability,
prosperity and peace.”

He claimed that this new era will help dispel “the prevailing,
restrictive narrative of our neighborhood as a region of turmoil,
conflict and crisis” and unfold a “radically different” one with a
positive and inclusive agenda that will promote “cooperation, peace,
stability and prosperity.”

Quintessentially, however, the four participants hope to acquire
strategic depth in the pursuit of their shared antagonism toward
Turkey by pooling their resources and strengthening all-around mutual
cooperation.

On Sunday, Israel and Greece announced their biggest ever defense
procurement deal, which includes a US$1.65 billion contract for the
establishment and operation of a training center for the Hellenic Air
Force by Israeli defense contractor Elbit Systems over a 22-year
period.

The Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz has said, “I am certain that
[this program] will upgrade the capabilities and strengthen the
economies of Israel and Greece and thus the partnership between our
two countries will deepen on the defense, economic and political
levels.”

Meanwhile, the UAE and Greece too have a significant defense
cooperation program. Greece plans to acquire 40 fighter aircraft
inclusive of French Rafales and US-made F-35 stealth fighter jets. The
Biden administration has reportedly cleared the sale of 50 F-35s to
the UAE.

Clearly, Greek, Israeli and Emirati interests are converging on
containment of Turkey’s vaulting ambitions of regional dominance, with
which Cyprus also is in agreement. Importantly, it also enjoys US
backing.

But, significantly, Saudi Arabia and Egypt have kept out of the
four-nation grouping and are instead prioritizing the stabilization of
their relationship with Turkey.

Israel anticipates that the momentum toward the US-Iranian engagement
is becoming unstoppable and any new Gulf security paradigm would
inevitably visualize Iran’s inclusion. Israel needs to think hard and
fast as the Iran bogey has outlived its utility. Clearly, Iran’s
anti-Zionist policies never really added up to “anti-Semitism,”
either.

There must be a way forward to put aside the sword and take up the
plowshare to turn the loosened soil.


 

You may also like