Turkey awaits Obama with mixed emotions

Los Angeles Times
April 4 2009

Turkey awaits Obama with mixed emotions

Turks are excited about his visit, but they don’t want him to bring up
touchy subjects and belittle their country.

By Laura King
8:46 AM PDT, April 4, 2009

Reporting from Istanbul, Turkey — It seems Barack Obama’s face is
everywhere these days, gazing out from posters on practically every
street corner.

That’s because one of Turkey’s largest banks has appropriated his
image for an advertising campaign that cheekily plays off the crisis
enveloping U.S. financial institutions. In the campaign’s TV ads, an
actor playing the president says ruefully, "If only our banks were
like this one."

Obama’s planned visit to Turkey beginning Sunday night, his first as
president to a predominantly Muslim country, is being greeted with
eagerness and excitement here — but also with a trademark dose of
prickly nationalism.

The stopover is viewed with pride as an affirmation of Turkey’s
importance as a bridge between East and West, a moderate and
strategically positioned NATO ally with the ability to mediate with
hard-line Muslim governments. For a partnership bruised by the
perceived highhandedness of the Bush administration, particularly
during the run-up to the Iraq war, the visit is also seen as a
much-needed balm.

"Maybe Turkey needs the U.S., but no one should forget for a moment
that the U.S. definitely needs us too," said Emrah Goksu, a
24-year-old student watching the crowds go by in Istanbul’s Taksim
Square.

During the visit, hot-button issues such as Kurdish aspirations, human
rights and Turkey’s denial that ethnic Armenians were the victims of
genocide early in the last century are likely to stay well in the
background. But even veiled references to such controversial matters
will present plenty of opportunities for outbursts of indignation,
especially from right-wing politicians and their supporters.

Human rights groups and others, on the other hand, fret that diplomacy
will prevent the new president from raising issues they believe need
public airing but are branded as taboo.

"What I want to know is whether Obama thinks of Kurds as terrorists,
as we are always being called here," said Serhat Baglas, a trucker
from the mainly Kurdish town of Kars. "I want to know whether he sees
us as equals, as people."

Draconian security measures, together with a traditional willingness
by police to rough up demonstrators, probably will prevent
anti-government protesters from airing their views within the
U.S. president’s sight and hearing.

In Ankara, the capital, Obama is scheduled to address parliament —
considered a great honor for a foreign leader — and visit the
mausoleum of Turkey’s founding father, Kemal Ataturk.

Even before it takes place, though, the visit has provided a reminder
of the near-cult of personality surrounding Ataturk, which is viewed
uneasily by Western governments and human rights groups as an
instrument of repressing free speech and free expression.

The reverence for Ataturk, who largely created Turkey’s secular system
of government, is so extreme that criticism of him can draw legal
prosecution or the threat of it. It has spurred in part the repeated
blockage of YouTube by authorities, lest irreverent videos posted on
the site impugn his image.

Last week a magazine superimposed Obama’s head on a famous photograph
of Ataturk extolling the virtues of the Latin alphabet he had just
imposed to replace Arabic script, a gesture meant to propel Turkey
into a more modern Western milieu. In the original picture, Ataturk,
clad in a business suit, is gesturing at Latin letters on a placard.

But almost as soon as it hit the newsstands, the magazine, MediaCat,
had to hastily post a notice on its website explaining that the image
was not meant as a reference to Obama being in a position to provide
Turks with any sort of tutorial on Western virtues, but rather to
invoke the spirit of change the U.S. leader embodied for his own
people.

Obama’s visit comes when many Turks are disillusioned over the
multitude of obstacles to their nation’s bid to join the European
Union. The ruling Justice and Development Party, which has made EU
hopes a policy centerpiece, suffered a rebuke in municipal elections
last week, seeing its margin of victory shrink compared with national
elections in 2007.

Nationalist parties have long hammered away at the government of Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, accusing it of kowtowing to the West in
hopes of gaining EU acceptance.

Perhaps mindful of that, Erdogan seems to have been seeking to appear
more independent-minded and less inclined to do the West’s bidding. In
January he angrily stalked out of a session with Israeli President
Shimon Peres at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. And
last month Erdogan criticized the prospective choice of Danish Prime
Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen as the new chief of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization.

In Turkey, as across the Muslim world, there was fury over the 2005
printing in Denmark of cartoons of the prophet Muhammad. Turkey has
also complained repeatedly about Denmark allowing a Kurdish-language
TV station to broadcast from there.

Despite a sense of longtime grievance directed at the West in general
and the United States in particular, Turks tend to see the new
American president as fresh, young and energetic. Many make approving
note of his well-traveled background and his ethnic heritage,
including, of course, his Muslim father.

"We hope he will be a symbol of change all over the world," said
27-year-old Suzan Kose.

In a country where polls in recent years have indicated an
overwhelming degree of anti-American sentiment, many commentators
described the visit as an opportunity for the United States to turn a
new page not only with Turkey, but also the Muslim world.

"Obama seems to have understood the importance of gaining Turkey,"
columnist Murat Yetkin wrote in the daily newspaper Radikal. "Or more
importantly, of not losing it."

Obama’s Visit May Inspire The ‘Change’ Turkey Itself Needs

OBAMA’S VISIT MAY INSPIRE THE ‘CHANGE’ TURKEY ITSELF NEEDS
by Ilhan Tanir

The Daily Star
April 3, 2009 Friday
Lebanon

Early next week, President barack Obama makes his first visit to a
Muslim-majority country within his first 100 days in office and by
doing that he will have fulfilled another campaign promise. According
to the news reports, many bilateral issues will be discussed, such
as assistance for US troop withdrawal from Iraq through Turkey.

Early next week, President barack Obama makes his first visit to a
Muslim-majority country within his first 100 days in office and by
doing that he will have fulfilled another campaign promise. According
to the news reports, many bilateral issues will be discussed,
such as assistance for US troop withdrawal from Iraq through Turkey;
stability in Afghanistan and Pakistan; policies against Iran and Syria,
as well as the wider Middle East peace process. At the same time, the
Obama must have noticed by now that Turkey has been accomplishing some
positive results by reaching out to its neighbors in recent years. New
Turkish foreign policies such as disentangling historic conflicts with
surrounding countries have started to bear fruit. Turkish officials now
visit any country in the wider region and can shoulder an exhausted
US in the region, as some US State Department officials recently
elaborated the need for these regional strategic partnerships in
broad-spectrum speeches at the US Institute of Peace conference in
Washington, DC.

In the meantime, Turkey’s full EU membership ambitions have been
somewhat disappointing. It is true that, especially after the EU
granted official-candidate status to Turkey for full EU membership in
2005, the Turkish administration has slowed the much-praised reform
agenda. Turkish officials have given many reasons for this sluggishness
though none of them are sufficient to explain this attitude. After
all, these reforms are essential for Turkish citizens who strive to
live better.

The Turkish government also has been making a lot of progress
when it comes to re-establishing its relationship with its Kurdish
population. Only 18 years ago, the Kurdish language was prohibited
in Turkey and Kurdish identity was mostly denied. Today, an official
State television channel broadcasts in Kurdish.

However, much more work needs to be accomplished in regards to other
minorities. "The threat is growing nationalism and frustration
with the US and Europe," a new US Assistant Secretary of State,
Philip H. Gordon wrote as a co-author of a book on Turkey. Also,
if the upcoming Armenian Genocide legislation passes in the House,
this would further vent the chauvinistic flames in Turkey and could
possibly set back much of the newly gained progress as well as newly
improving relations with Armenia.

Today, Turkey is trying to turn yet another important corner toward
fostering its democracy, with facing its own recent history. The
judicial investigation into a shadowy ultranationalist group known as
Ergenekon is continuing. In order to prove that democracy and Islam
can properly function hand-in-hand, the Turkish democratic escapade
must reach its final destination as a fully democratic, secular and
modern country. But, still a mix of ineptitude, politicization and
disinformation has disheartened many observers who wish to see the
trials as a step toward an accountable and democratic Turkey, not a
day for vengeance.

All the same, the Turkish democratic struggle is not moving forward
linearly. First off, laws that govern Turkish political parties
give utmost power to party leadership. This dysfunctional process
enables party leaders to become impervious party dictators, who can
annul local party organizations, cherry-pick the MP candidates and
hold hostage the party members by various means to keep themselves
"voted in" forever. For example, Deniz Baykal, a leader of the main
opposition party, is still the strongest man in his party despite
decades of election defeats, including one Sunday.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the prime minister and the leader of the ruling
Justice and Development Party, or AKP, is another example. Erdogan has
been running a one-man show in the government as the other founding
fathers of the AKP have been eliminated one way or another in the
recent years, though the local elections last Sunday promised some
hope for the future of checks and balances amid dwindling support
for the AKP. Yet, the AKP is still the winner and whether it learned
necessary lessons, or whether the opposition parties can resonate
with the people remains to be seen.

And there is the Turkish free press. In recent months there have been
many disturbing episodes that have distressed many spectators who
follow Turkey closely. First, Erdogan irately targeted the outspoken
Dogan Media group urging people not to buy their newspapers. Then,
tax inspectors decided to fine the same media outlet a huge amount,
which unsurprisingly overlapped with the local elections. Freedom
of speech, tolerance and harsh humor are also under fire, as Erdogan
persists in suing writers and caricaturists as he deems that he should
be above such criticism. This state of emotion gives another sample
of untouchable psychology and many Turkish experts now echo Erdogan’s
authoritarian ambitions during off-the-record talks. Perhaps hearing
about some of Turkey’s shortcomings from a popular and transformational
American president during the upcoming visit will do the trick and
assist in preparing the groundwork, this time, for Turkey’s "change."

Ilhan Tanir frequently writes for a Turkish daily, Hurriyet Daily
News, and works for a private consulting firm as a research director
in Washington, DC.

Ex-Mayor Of Yerevan Appointed As Head Of State Committee For Real Es

EX-MAYOR OF YEREVAN APPOINTED AS HEAD OF STATE COMMITTEE FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE

Noyan Tapan
Apr 3, 2009

YEREVAN, April 3. /ARKA/. Armenian president appointed the former
Mayor of Yerevan Yervand Zakharyan the Chairman of the State Committee
for Real Estate Cadastre of Armenia, the presidential press service
reported.

Under a presidential decree, Zakharyan was relieved of the post of
Advisor to President. Former Chairman of the State Committee for
Real Estate Cadastre Manuk Vardanyan was appointed as Advisor to
President.

The Pitfalls And Possibilities; Armenian-Turkish Relations Explored

THE PITFALLS AND POSSIBILITIES; ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS EXPLORED
By Allen Yekikan

;ASBSC=Close d
Friday, April 3, 2009

AYF Seminar Delves Deep into Complexities of Normalization

BIG PINES, CA–The past, present, and future of Armenian-Turkish
relations were the focus of a three day seminar on March 20-22
that brought some 70 young Armenian Americans to the Armenian Youth
Federation’s campgrounds in Big Pines, California.

The seminar covered a broad range of issues related to the current
push to normalize ties between the two countries, including the history
of the Ottoman Empire as well as the political and economic realities
surrounding the troubled relations between Armenia and Turkey today.

"We wanted to present the current status of Armenian-Turkish relations
and where it is going or should be going," said Shahan Boghikian, whose
educational committee organized the seminar. "If and when relations
are normalized, it is our generation, both in Turkey and Armenia,
that will start the socialization process between the two peoples."

The various discussions sought to build a framework of understanding
that will help a new generation of youth actively influence Armenian
and Turkish societies, according to Boghikian. He also noted that
the weekend’s theme was Agos, the Armenian word for pathway.

A Mutual Understanding of History

The bridge building role of a new generation of Armenian activists
was the focus of the seminar’s first presentation, which traced the
development of Armenian-Turkish relations from the early days of the
Ottoman Empire to the Armenian Genocide.

"The entire history of Armenian-Turkish relations amounts to about
a thousand years of shared experiences," explained Professor Garabet
Moumjian who delivered the presentation.

These historic issues, however, have been dealt with only marginally
on both sides, with Turkey banning any discussion of the Armenian
Genocide. This, along with decades of animosity toward Turkey’s denial,
has made it difficult for the budding of a positive and progressive
movement toward normalizing relations, he explained.

While he acknowledged that good neighborly relations are necessary
for survival in an increasingly globalized world, Momujian noted
that as much as this is important for Armenians, it is more important
for Turks.

Moumjian said that because the larger part of Turkish society has been
in denial for the past 94 years it has forgotten about an indigenous
people that lived with them for nearly a millennium. "They have to
deal with it with a real effort to know the past, and study it as
opposed to forcefully forgetting it," he said.

Armenia’s Legal Rights

A crucial aspect of that past is the fact that the Ottoman Government
and its secular successor have stripped the Armenian people of their
legal and historic rights to live on their ancestral homeland free and
secure to exercise their right to self determination. Furthermore,
a nearly incalculable amount of real property both in terms of land
property and possessions were lost during the Armenian Genocide.

Any relations between Armenia and Turkey must be founded on a
mutual acceptance of this reality, according to the weekend’s second
speaker, Steven Dadaian, who is a member of the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation’s Western USA Central Committee.

"As with any crime, in order to help ensure that it will not
be recommitted, there has to be a remedy for the crime," he said,
adding that the Genocide has been a "sore on the body politic of the
Armenian nation," carried on for almost a century because the issue
has not been resolved.

As a result, the Armenian nation today has very legitimate claims
against the government of Turkey, explained Dadaian, discussing the
Armenian nation’s legal and political rights under international law
and specifically the Treaty of Sevres.

On November 22, 1920, US President Woodrow Wilson affixed his official
seal on the Treaty of Sevres, which delineated the Armenian-Turkish
border and submitted it to the Paris Peace conference. "That action
effectively and legally transferred the historic Armenian territories
of Erzerum, Trebizond, Van and Bitlis under Turkish occupation to
the first Republic of Armenia," Dadaian said.

According to Article 89 of the treaty, Turkey and Armenia had agreed to
submit to the arbitration of the US President and accept his decision
to establish the Armenian-Turkish frontier "in the Vilayets of Erzerum,
Trebizond, Van and Bitlis." Article 90. Meanwhile, stipulated that both
parties agreed to renounce "all rights and title over the territory so
transferred" once Wilson’s stamp was set on the document. Both articles
stood as stand alone provisions within the treaty, with the full
force of international law, whether or not the treaty was ratified.

Because article 89 and 90 are still legally binding on Turkey, the
"current border between between Armenia and Turkey is illegal; it’s
a de facto border," Dadaian said. "This is the crux of the dispute
between Armenia as well as the Armenian Diaspora as heirs to this
legacy and Turkey today."

"The legal border and frontier of Armenia and Turkey can only be
governed and determined by treaties and here is where the problem
arises for the Turks," he added. "This is why they have no official
relationship to Armenia."

Since Armenia rarely discusses this issue it has left Turkey in
the drivers seat as it consistently hinges the normalization of its
relations with Armenia on signing a treaty that recognizes the current
de-facto frontier between the two countries.

"This is a problem, Dadaian explained. "If we sign such a treaty
with Turkey, we will be giving up our political and legal rights,"
he said. "The border that currently exists has no legal basis today."

In essence, the Turkish government is using economic and military
pressure today to force the Republic of Armenia to get what it
cannot achieve given the current status of the treaties. This makes
scrutiny of recent dialogue between Ankara and Yerevan all the more
important. Under these circumstances, if Wilsonian Armenia is to be
lost, it will have been the Republic of Armenia that gave it away and
in the process, the diasporan heirs will have had their opportunity
for justice undercut.

For Dadaian, it’s vital that this generation of activists work to
ensure that the reconciliation between Armenians and Turks be rooted
in the restoration of Armenia’s legal rights. "Armenia cannot survive
as an independent state with these current borders, let alone compete
with Turkey, or in the world in general, on an equal economic footing,"
he stressed.

Economic Inequality

The success of any relationship building measure requires a certain
degree of equity, but that is currently devoid in the ongoing
normalization process, noted Aram Kaloustian, the third presenter of
the day and a member of the ARF’s Western US Central Committee.

Armenia, under blockade by Turkey and Azerbaijan since 1993, has a far
smaller and weaker economy than Turkey whose economy is ranked as the
15th largest economy in the world. Kaloustian presented the possible
impacts on Armenia’s economy that open borders with Turkey would bring.

Citing a 2007 AIPRG conference on this issue held in Yerevan,
Kaloustian said that analysts have predicted that an unbound frontier
will allow the establishment of transport networks and energy links
from Turkey through the Caucasus to Central Asia. The end of the
blockade, he added, will also open up Armenia’s economy for Turkish
business and vice versa.

But Armenia’s economy may be at a serious disadvantage in this
scenario, Kaloustian noted, explaining that it is still in its infancy
and ill-equipped to compete against its Turkish counterparts.

"On the short term, the biggest factor that will be affected is
the cost of transporting goods in and out of Armenia," he said,
underscoring how the Russian-Georgian war last August closed off
Armenia’s main access point to the world, costing the country millions
in lost trade.

Kaloustian noted that while the cost of shipping goods into and out
of Armenia will drastically drop and certain sectors of the economy
would benefit, these benefits would not be felt by the majority of
the Armenians in the republic. If the Sarkisian Administration fails
to address key concerns regarding economic corruption in Armenia,
any benefits of the open border would overwhelmingly only be enjoyed
by few within the republic.

"Armenia’s economy is small and concentrated in the hands of few. This
puts Armenia at an unequal footing to compete with Turkey," explained
Kaloustian.

This is a reflection of the fact that Armenia does not have the laws in
place to protect its national economy from being monopolized by Turkish
corporations according to the previously cited AIPRG conference report.

Highlighting the lack of preparedness in Armenia for an open boarder,
one need only look at the energy sector of Armenia’s economy. When the
Armenia-Turkey border opens, in the short run, Armenia will become an
energy producer, exporting electricity from its hydroelectric plants to
Turkey’s eastern provinces, which have remained largely underdeveloped
since the Armenian Genocide. "Unfortunately, the Armenian energy sector
is primarily owned by foreign companies," Kaloustian pointed out.

The average Armenian will not see the benefit of the border opening
and it will have a limited impact in securing a short term relief from
Armenia’s deepening economic recession. In this light, it becomes
readily apparent that there may be a significant danger of trading
away Armenia’s rights to lands necessary for its long-term stability
and economic prosperity in return for short term reduction of costs
and opportunities in a limited number of sectors, the benefits of
which would unlikely be felt by the majority of Armenian citizens.

According to Kaloustian, the lifting of the blockade may also lead to
a upsurge in development in the occupied provinces, where impoverished
and oppressed Kurds currently make up the majority. Investment has
already slowly begun to trickle into places like Garin and Van,
transforming them into prominent centers of manufacturing.

"The richer and more developed these regions become, the more difficult
it will be to transfer the land back to Armenia," Kaloustian warned,
noting how more and more generations of non-Armenians will settle on
those lands once it becomes comfortable to live there.

A Contemporary Issue

The seminar ended with an open forum moderated by the weekend’s
director Aram Madelian, who opened the floor for participants
to discuss the topics presented. Debate over the implications of
normalizing relations with Turkey and possible new avenues of activism
toward attaining justice for the Armenian Genocide took center stage.

During the back and forth, some participants criticized the Armenian
government’s handling of its rapprochement with Turkey; others
expressed concerned with how open borders with Turkey would impact
their lives here in America.

"What’s important for us to realize is that the matters discussed
during this seminar are not issues to be relegated to the past,
but causes for contemporary concern that must be addressed by us as
a community, said Vache Thomassian, the chairman of the AYF, during
the closing discussion. "Whether we live in Armenia, Europe, or the
United States, the decisions made in Yerevan and Ankara in the coming
months will affect us all for generations to come."

www.asbarez.com/#AMC=Open&amp

Persecution Of Christians In Iran

PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS IN IRAN
by Wahied Wahdat-Hagh

Iran Press Watch

http: // t-page-1/
April 4 2009

Editor’s Note: The Baha’i case is an outstanding example of the moral
and intellectual corruption of the Iranian Islamic government. Readers
should, however, be made aware that other groups such as women, Kurds,
and Christians endure similar persecutions in the same country.

Christians are unlikely to be doing missionary work in Iran. Following
a court ruling, even churches are closed down if they preach in
Farsi. And bloggers who put biblical quotations on the internet
are detained.

On 25 March 2009, the Farsi Christian News Network FCNN reported that
the Assyrian church in the town of Shahrara was to be closed down
following a ruling by an Iranian revolutionary court. On 19 March,
Jonathan Betkolia had informed the Assyrian community in the Iranian
capital Tehran of this decision.The reason for the ruling was given as
"Farsi-speaking Iranians newly converted to Christianity taking part
in church masses".

Court ruling on church closure

Jonathan Betkolia, who represents Iran’s 35,000-strong Assyrian
community in the Islamic "Parliament", has come into conflict with
Iranian priests in the Assyrian community.As a politician, in the past
few months he has often criticised the activities of the priests,
who had allegedly enabled Farsi-speaking Christians to gain access
to the Assyrian church. After warnings from the Assyrian politician,
Father Viktor admittedly announced that only Assyrians could take part
in church masses, otherwise the church would be closed down. A court
ruling to close down the church has nonetheless been issued. The
Christian committee of the organisation Human Rights Activists in
Iran reported that this ruling had taken place in the context of
growing pressure on Iranian Christians.

Sermons only allowed in the Armenian or Assyrian languages

The alleged aim is to "cleanse Iranian Christians",thereby preventing
the Christian faith from spreading among Iranians who are not members
of the ethnic groups of Assyrians and Armenians. The Armenian and
Assyrian churches are regarded as ethnic churches.Preaching in
Farsi is not allowed there, with sermons only allowed in Armenian
or Assyrian. Human Rights Activists in Iran write that the Iranian
state is depriving Iranians of their human rights to change religion
and faith. Nor is there any right to speak about one’s own faith
collectively and publicly, in Farsi, in the context of churches’
religious instruction and in church masses. In the past eight years
the Assyrian church in Shahrara has held additional events and masses
on Fridays and Sundays for Farsi-speaking, non-Assyrian people.

Two Christians detained in Isfahan

The FCNN further reported on 24 March that two Iranian Christians had
been detained in Isfahan.One of them, called Mazaher R, is 30 years
old and a "Christian internet activist". According to the FCNN, he
had proclaimed the Bible’s message in his blog.One of his readers, who
contacted him by email as "Father Reza", arranged a meeting with him
to discuss "the message of Jesus Christ". On 22 February, Mazaher went
to the meeting together with his sister and another fellow Christian
called Hamed C.The supposed "Father Reza" was present with a woman
who introduced herself as Maria."Father Reza", who later turned out
to be a police informer, invited the three Iranian Christians to a
residence where a new Christian was allegedly to be baptised.Together
they went into the building indicated as a house church,where they
were arrested by civil servants and security forces.With their eyes
covered, they were led away to an unknown place.

No information on detention of Iranian Christians

On 23 February the Iranian police raided the house of the father of the
Christian blogger Mazaher R, seizing computers, printers and Christian
books, among other things. The sister of Mazaher R was released after
a week in detention.She said that under interrogation she was berated
and placed under so much pressure that she distanced herself from her
own brother’s Christian activities. For a month now, Iranian police
and secret services have refused to give any information about the
detention of the two Iranian Christians. Members of the detained
Christians’ families have in the meantime found out about the house,
described by the police informer "Father Reza" as a house church. On
finding it empty, they quizzed the occupants of the neighbouring
house, who told them that the house had been empty and unoccupied
for months. Nobody in the street knew of any "Father Reza". As
written by Human Rights Activists in Iran, the detention of the two
Christians must be seen in connection with the Revolutionary Guards’
new repressive measures against bloggers. The Islamic government, they
said, regarded any "non-Islamic activity as anti-Islamic and directed
against the religion".This meant that the government could paint any
religious movement as a measure of "gentle subversive revolution".

Wahied is a Senior Fellow with the European Foundation for Democracy
in Brussels.

http://europeandemocracy.org/index.php
www.iranpresswatch.org/2009/04/christians/commen

US Lawmakers Urge Obama To Back Turkey’s EU Bid

US LAWMAKERS URGE OBAMA TO BACK TURKEY’S EU BID

Agence France Presse
April 2 2009
France

WASHINGTON (AFP) — US lawmakers urged President Barack Obama Wednesday
to throw his weight behind Turkey’s accession to the European Union
and strongly support the NATO ally’s reconciliation with Armenia.

"The United States must remain an iron clad supporter of Turkish
membership in the EU," 29 Democrats and Republicans from the House
of Representatives said in a letter to the president, who is bound
for Turkey within days.

The lawmakers urged Obama to help Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan’s government undertake the necessary political, economic and
judicial reforms to join the European Union.

"We believe Turkey’s success as a secular democracy that fully respects
the rule of law and guarantees freedoms, civil, religious and human
rights are in the interest of the Turkish people, the European Union
and the United States," they said.

Lawmakers also thanked Turkey for its support in stabilizing
Afghanistan, including hosting three-way talks with Pakistan, and
for US-led efforts to build democracy in Iraq.

They also urged "unequivocal" US support for Turkey and Armenia’s
efforts at easing longstanding tensions.

Armentel Pledges To Avoid Tariff Increases Despite Pressure Of Finan

ARMENTEL PLEDGES TO AVOID TARIFF INCREASES DESPITE PRESSURE OF FINANCIAL CRISIS

World Markets Research Centre
Global Insight
April 2, 2009

Armenian mobile operator Armentel has indicated that it has no plans
to increase tariffs in the wake of the financial crisis. Company
Director General Neicho Velichkov is widely quoted as telling a news
conference this week that the financial crisis must not prevent the
group from implementing its scheduled programmes, adding that no job
cuts were planned in 2009. He admitted that if the situation changed
for the worse tariff hikes may be implemented, but emphasised that
none is currently planned.

Significance:Armentel’s parent company, Russian integrated operator
VimpelCom, has been severely hit by the financial crisis, particularly
as so much of its $8US-billion debt is rouble-denominated (seeRussia:
11 March 2009:). It is therefore debatable whether Armentel will
benefit from the same level of investment as it has in previous
years. Nevertheless, the operator appears confident that the current
economic climate should not force it to hike tariffs. IHS Global
Insight estimates that at the end of 2008 mobile penetration in
Armenia was below 80%, leaving room for organic growth and continued
revenue generation. This ought to provide something of a buffer for
Armentel’s finances in 2009, particularly as 3G services have only
recently been launched in the country.

Armenian Genocide Issue As A Means For Exerting Pressure On Turkey

ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ISSUE AS A MEANS FOR EXERTING PRESSURE ON TURKEY
Anna Nazaryan

"Radiolur"
02.04.2009 18:57

The rumors that US President Barack Obama will utter the word
genocide are just pressure on Turkey on the way of realization of
objectives of the United States. Some mention exact days of opening
the border. However, Turkologist Artak Shakaryan considers that there
is little possibility for its opening.

"Some progress in relations is possible within the coming months. The
border will be opened partially, the visa regime will be mitigated,"
he said.

According to Shakaryan, the Armenian-Turkish relations depend not
only on Armenia and Turkey: it is a diplomatic gamble on a higher
level. According to him, Barack Obama is not visiting Turkey for the
sake of Armenian-Turkish relations. He is coming to reach agreements
on a number of other issues.

Among those issues the Turkologist pointed out the forthcoming
presidential elections in Iran and the possible thaw in
American-Iranian relations, where Washington ascribes an important
role to Turkey, the improvement of Turkish-Russian relations and the
position of the United States.

However, According to Shakaryan, there may be some improvement in
the Armenian-Turkish relations as a result of Obama’s visit, which
will find its manifestation in milder statements of Turkish Foreign
Minister Ali Babacan during his visit to Armenia in April.

Representatives Of International Structures Also To Carry Out Monito

REPRESENTATIVES OF INTERNATIONAL STRUCTURES ALSO TO CARRY OUT MONITORING MISSION IN YEREVAN COUNCIL OF ELDERS ELECTIONS

Noyan Tapan
Apr 2, 2009

YEREVAN, APRIL 2, NOYAN TAPAN. For carrying out a monitoring mission
in Yerevan Council of Elders elections the RA Central Electoral
Commission is going to invite Ambassadors of OSCE member-states
and Ambassadors accredited in RA, having a residence in Yerevan,
heads of the OSCE Yerevan Office and IFES Armenian branch, Special
Representative of Council of Europe Secretary General in Armenia,
as well as the Chairman of the NKR CEC. CEC made a unanimous decision
on it at the April 2 meeting.

When making the decision the Commission took into consideration the
fact that the government has already sent an invitation to carry out
a monitoring mission to the Council of Europe Congress of Regional
and Local Authorities.

Nairi Petrossian Assumes Obligations Of Spokesperson For The Preside

NAIRI PETROSSIAN ASSUMES OBLIGATIONS OF SPOKESPERSON FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

National Assembly of RA
April 2 2009
Armenia

Since April 1 2009, Mr. Nairi Petrossian has been appointed
Spokesperson for the President of the National Assembly of the Republic
of Armenia.

Since 1997 he had been with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
Republic of Armenia: in the divisions of Turkey (1997-1998), Media
Relations (1998-2000) and South Caucasus (2000-2001). 2001-2002 he
had assumed obligations of the Head of the U.S. and Canada division,
and 2003-2004 – Head of Media Relations Division. 2004-2007 he had
been posted to the Armenian Permanent Representation to OSCE. After
completing his mission he was employed by the OSCE Secretariat as
Conference Officer of the decision-making bodies and Head of the
Meetings Assistance Unit.

Mr Nairi Petrossian, 33, majored in Turkish Studies and graduated
from the Department of Turkish Studies of Faculty of Oriental Studies
of the Yerevan State University in 1998. He is also an alumnus of
the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University (1999)
and of the Senior Course at the NATO Defense College in Rome (2003).