Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan to set up common economic space by 2012

Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan to set up common economic space by 2012

19.12.2009, 17.00

AK BULAK HOTEL, near Almaty (Itar-Tass) – Presidents of Dmitry
Medvedev of Russia, Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus and Nursultan
Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan have agreed to set up a common economic space
by January 1, 2012.

This is said in a statement the three heads of state issued at the end
of Saturday’s informal summit.

`We’re committed to a further deepening of integration processes in
the space of the Eurasian Economic Community and as the next
objective, we confirm our willingness to setting up a common economic
space to embrace the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan
and the Russian Federation by January 1, 2012,’ the statement.

Erdogan and Obama: much to discuss

GlobalPost
December 7, 2009 Monday 11:13 AM EST

Erdogan and Obama: much to discuss

BYLINE: Nichole Sobecki

Dec. 7, 2009 (GlobalPost delivered by Newstex) —

ISTANBUL, Turkey ‘ Whether it’s a topic of discussion or not, Iran
will likely be the 300-pound gorilla in the room when Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan meets with U.S. President Barack Obama
at the White House on Monday.

The two leaders ‘ each renowned for his particular brand of straight
talk ‘ are seeking strengthened ties at a time when both have weighty
domestic and foreign agendas: for Erdogan, diplomatic engagement with
Armenia and Iraq and Kurdish rights; and for Obama, deepening U.S.
involvement in Afghanistan and ongoing concerns over Iran’s nuclear
program.

But the tenor of the meeting ‘ the first one-on-one between the two
leaders since Obamas historic visit to Turkey this past April ‘ is
expected to reflect growing unease among U.S. officials with Turkeys
recent foreign diplomacy shifts, according to foreign policy analysts.
For his part, Erdogan intends to tout his government’s foreign policy
activism and will be giving a series of speeches to Washington’s
foreign policy community.

Å`Im a bit afraid that Erdogan is going to go into this meeting
blindly, his shopping list of favors in hand, completely ignorant of
the impression ‘ right or wrong ‘ that his recent actions have been
giving many in the U.S., said Gareth Jenkins, a journalist, author and
analyst based in Turkey.

Erdogan’s coziness with Iran and Sudan, coupled with his harsh
criticism of Israel, are feeding claims that Turkey is neglecting its
tight U.S. alliance and abandoning the West in favor of a neo-Ottoman
dominion (NYSE :D) in the East. Erdogan may be in Washington this
week, but a month ago he was standing next to his Å`good friend Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad in Tehran and defending Iran’s nuclear program.

Erdogan will undoubtedly have a hard time explaining to Obama his
reluctance to back new sanctions against Iran. Claims of brotherhood
aside, Erdogan and Ahmadinejad are united in much more concrete terms
by the great energy game. Turkey is set to invest $3.5 billion in
Irans South Pars gas field, intended to ensure that Iran, as Turkeys
second biggest gas provider next to Russia, will have the ready supply
to meet Turkeys growing demand.

Å`The current government has a much more comfortable relationship with
all of its Middle Eastern allies; they are as comfortable meeting in
Tehran and Damascus as they are in Brussels and Washington, said Ian
Lesser, a Senior Transatlantic Fellow at the Washington-based German
Marshall Fund. Å`Iran, ultimately, will be the litmus test for
Turkish-US ties.

The Turks say they’re seeking to become what Turkish Foreign Minister
Ahmet Davutoglu calls a Å`partner to solve the region’s problems. But
other actions, such as Erdogans support of Sudan’s president, Omar
al-Bashir, claiming he couldn’t possibly be guilty of genocide in
Darfur because he’s a Å`good Muslim, have isolated many in Washington.
Right now there are Å`more points of disagreement than of agreement
between Washington and Ankara, said Philip Gordon, Obama’s point man
on Turkey at the State Department.

Among the biggest worries has been the souring of ties with Israel,
once Turkey’s close ally, over the military offensive in Gaza earlier
this year. Erdogans decision to bar Israel at the last minute from
taking part in NATO military exercises in Turkey this October has only
further disillusioned many Israelis over the future of this strategic
partnership.

But experts say that despite differences, Turkey remains an invaluable
U.S. ally as Washington confronts challenges in Afghanistan, Pakistan,
Iran and the Middle East.

"The American side does not seem to have the intention of rocking the
boat in relations with Turkey because Turkey is too important," said
Semih Idiz, a columnist for Milliyet newspaper.

The Incirlik airbase in southern Turkey is a supply hub for American
troops and equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan, and Turkey will likely
be a key transit route as U.S. forces are drawn down.

Eyes have also fallen on Turkey, which is NATO’s only Muslim member,
since Obama announced on Tuesday he was sending 30,000 more U.S.
soldiers to Afghanistan. Turkey currently has 1,750 soldiers on Afghan
soil, although their mandate is limited to strictly noncombat duties.
The Islamist-inspired Justice and Development Party dislikes being
asked to fight fellow Muslims and, while suggestions have been made
that Turkey will increase its troop presence, it will likely be only
for training and civilian-development duties.

U.S. ambassador to Turkey James Jeffrey said Obama and Erdogan would
discuss the issue, adding: "We’re expecting flexibility on the
definition of the mission Turkish troops will undertake. Every soldier
in Afghanistan is a combat force."

In the 40 days since Obama and Erdogan were first set to meet ‘ the
initial date of Oct. 29 was moved out of respect for Turkish Republic
Day ‘ the climate has changed from a time of waiting to a time for
action. From Obamas announcement of Americas new strategy in
Afghanistan to increasing pressure to apply sanctions on Iran, real
decisions are being made with global implications.

For the two leaders, this may mean that their meeting has become
significantly more difficult as they seek support from the other on
positions that they have spent 40 days moving farther apart.

Hamayak Hovhannisyan: Authorities Nominated "A Mere Nothing" For Par

HAMAYAK HOVHANNISYAN: AUTHORITIES NOMINATED "A MERE NOTHING" FOR PARLIAMENT

news.am
Dec 18 2009
Armenia

The parliamentary elections in Election District #10 will be of crucial
importance for the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process and Armenia-Turkey
reconciliation. These are the first elections of republican scale,
and the international community is looking forward to them exert
pressure on Armenia in case of any violations, Hamayak Hovhannisyan,
the Head of the Armenian Association of Political Scientists and
parliamentary candidate, told NEWS.am.

According to him, it is for the first time that in Election District
#10, the central election district of Yerevan with most of the
Armenian intellectuals residing there, "a mere political nobody"
and "blockhead" Ara Simonyan, who is relative of Yerevan Mayor
Gagik Beglaryan, is being pushed forward to Parliament. "Remember
the persons elected to Parliament from this election district – only
intellectuals. Now, however, black forces are trying to disgrace the
district by having their candidate elected to Parliament. Yerevan
Mayor Gagik Beglaryan has mobilized all the drug addicts and idlers to
fight against the candidate from the intelligentsia, Editor-in-Chief
of the Haykakan Zhamanak newspaper Nikol Pashinyan, who is a political
prisoner," Hovhannisyan said. He stated his intention to withdraw his
candidacy in Pashinyan’s favor and conduct monitoring on the election
day. Hovhannisyan also intends to take part in the Opposition’s rally
on January 8.

According to him, Pashinyan stands a high chance of winning the
elections. However, Hovhannisyan does rule out the possibility of
a clash with the "black forces." "If the Armenian authorities are
doing their best to have this political nobody elected, nothing
can be ruled out. We have two options: either Pashinyan wins the
elections or the authorities rig the elections and have their
candidate elected. In the second case a clash is inevitable until
the next parliamentary elections in 2012," he said. Obstacles are
being put to the opposition candidates, Hovhannisyan said. "I can say
that none of the TV companies, except for ALM, agrees to provide paid
airtime to opposition candidates," Hovhannisyan said.

The parliamentary elections in Election Districts are scheduled for
January 10.

Armenian-Turkish Process Not A Tango For The Two

ARMENIAN-TURKISH PROCESS NOT A TANGO FOR THE TWO

ArmInfo.
2009-12-17 14:40:00

ArmInfo. The Armenian-Turkish process is not a tango for the two. It is
a dance for the five that involves also the USA and Russia (Azerbaijan
maybe the fifth country – ed.). CNN Turk Editor in Chief Ferhat Boratav
made such comparison in a press conference in Yerevan on Thursday.

As regards the harsh response by Azerbaijan to the Armenian-Turkish
rapprochement, he said that Turkey was surprised at that. He is sure
that both Turkey and Armenia have been involved into a game named East-
West transport corridor and agreements between these two countries are
part of that game. No one could suppose that Azerbaijan might announce
its withdrawal from the game. Both Turkey and the USA want Azerbaijan
to stay in the game, the journalists said. He urged everyone not to
perceive this as naughtiness by Turkey and Azerbaijan.

For his part, Kadri Gursel, Milliyet, said that the Armenian-Turkish
process has faced a deadlock because of Azerbaijani factor.

Nevertheless, if Turkey’s interests are infringed, it may change its
stance, he said.

Turkey Will Ratify The Protocols Despite Azerbaijani Pressure, Turki

TURKEY WILL RATIFY THE PROTOCOLS DESPITE AZERBAIJANI PRESSURE, TURKISH REPORTERS SAY
Anna Nazaryan

"Radiolur"
17.12.2009 18:55

The meeting of the Armenian and Turkish reporters in Yerevan was an
opportunity to clarify the dispositions on the possible establishment
of the Armenian-Turkish relations. During the meeting organized by
the Eurasia Foundation and sponsored by the Government of Norway,
the Turkish journalists were constantly referring to the necessity
of settlement of the Karabakh conflict.

Armenia and Turkey are not a couple dancing tango. There are five of
us dancing, since the United States, Russia and Azerbaijan have a role
to play in the process, says Ferhat Bonatay, reporter of the CNN Turk.

Correspondent of the Milliyet daily Pary Gursel insists that the
protocols will hardly be ratified by the Turkish Parliament unless
there is progress in the Karabakh issue. "If there is no progress,
the Turkish Parliament will find some ways for the solution of the
issue," the Turkish reporter said. He did not clarify, however, which
those measures are, adding only that "although the Karabakh issue is
not included in the protocols, life is different."

Pary Gursel said he believes the Turkish Parliament will ratify the
protocols despite Azerbaijani pressure.

Turkey, Between Ethic And Politics: Put It All On The Table – R. Hov

TURKEY, BETWEEN ETHIC AND POLITICS: PUT IT ALL ON THE TABLE – R. HOVANNISIAN

NEWS.am
17:12 / 12/16/2009

NEWS.am posts the article under "Turkey, between ethic and politics:
put it all on the table" head by Heritage party leader and Founding
Director of Armenian Center for National and International Studies
Raffi K. Hovannisian.

"Yerevan – In Washington, Brussels, Moscow and elsewhere, Turkish
President Abdullah Gul, Prime Minister Erdogan, Foreign Minister
Davutoglu and others have long advocated combining onto one political
agenda their country’s normalization of relations with Armenia and the
resolution of Mountainous Karabagh’s conflict with Azerbaijan. I agree.

Newly-independent Armenia’s ostensibly mature policy – which I
supported as the nation’s first foreign affairs minister – of seeking
establishment of diplomatic relations without the positing of any
preconditions can today, 18 years into the game, be pronounced dead
on arrival.

Oddly but expectedly, it has been the senior government at Ankara
which, instead of finally recognizing the responsibility of its
Ottoman-Young Turk predecessors for the great genocide and national
dispossession of 1915 or at minimum employing the facility of
an unconditional official relationship to address and solve the
outstanding issues that resulted from it, has ab initio proffered
a variety of unilateral conditions. The staple prerequisites of a)
removing genocide and its affirmation from Armenia’s international
vocabulary and b) validating the de facto Turkish-Armenian
frontier which had been imposed by Bolshevik-Kemalist fiat in
1921, have since been supplemented by c) a Baku-centric regulation
of Armenian-Azerbaijani relations and of Mountainous Karabagh’s
legitimate quest for liberty, post-Stalinist decolonization and
sovereign statehood.

The bilateral power asymmetry of the past has been conjoined with a
contemporary asymmetry in diplomatic demeanor, which is underscored
by Turkey’s continued bad-neighborly blockade. This makes it finally
impossible to bridge the Turkish-Armenian divide by old and outdated
technologies.

Turkey is right on this score. And so, for the first time in all
history, bring it all out and onto the table and let’s hammer out a
comprehensive blueprint that delivers us to a brave new future of
peace, prosperity and shared security for the parties and for the
broader region.

This daring paradigm, which will entail the constructive support of
the world of nations, must give solution and closure to a few pivotal
points on the agenda:

1) In order to realize its ambition of becoming an area leader of
democratic repute, Turkey must face the cardinal sin in its memory
closet, surmount decades of denialism and, in the prime but sadly
unique example of postwar Germany, chart its own dev yol to recognition
and remorse, redemption and restitution. These can materialize by
repealing racist laws; paying honest tribute and bringing truth to
education; conducting a complete inventory of, and then restoring, the
vast cultural heritage in present-day eastern Turkey and celebrating
its Armenian identity; launching and carrying through a homecoming
initiative to guarantee the right of voluntary return to the Armenian
heartland for the progeny of genocide survivors and the dispossessed.

2) It is imperative to determine and delimit the boundaries between
the Republics of Turkey and Armenia: Are they the de jure borders
as defined and awarded under Woodrow Wilson’s presidential seal in
November 1920, or the ones that obtained de facto as part of the
Russo-Turkish compact of 1921 which usurped the lion’s share of the
ancestral Armenian patrimony? What is the legal status of the historic
homelands currently under Turkish occupation, and does Armenia have a
right to sovereign access to the sea? To these ends, and absent the
parties’ diplomatic good-faith in answering these questions, likely
telling of their positions and preoccupations would be their acceptance
of the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.

3) The same goes for Mountainous Karabagh and Armenian-Azerbaijani
relations. We live in a world in which the rule of interests often
trumps the rule of law, where most Western nations have overcome
standard fixations on the principle of territorial integrity to
recognize Kosovo, just as the Russian Federation and a couple of
others have done the same for Abkhazia. Under international law,
the Montevideo Convention and the Soviet legislation controlling at
the time of Karabagh’s referendum on independence, the juridical
underpinnings of its sovereignty are as strong as, if not more
solid than, the aforementioned examples. Kosovo’s &’sui generis’
argument uses a fancy label that betrays a false distinction without
a true difference. All the countries that recognized either Kosovo or
Abkhazia, if the rule of laws and rights is important to them, must
move immediately to recognize the Republic of Mountainous Karabagh
within its constitutional borders. Armenia and Turkey should lead
the way.

4) As for the polemical scoring point of &’occupied’ territories and
the return of refugees, the case is closed on these consequences of
Azerbaijan’s failed war of aggression against Karabagh. And it will
remain closed until and unless a) Turkey releases from occupation
the Armenian provinces currently under its control and allows for the
descendants’ exercise of the right of return to their national home;
and b) Azerbaijan lifts its occupation of the Armenian territories of
Shahumian, Getashen and Nakhichevan, pays for the brutal and documented
destruction in December 2005 of the Armenian cultural wonder called
Jugha, provides a right of return and compensation to the 400,000
Armenian refugees from Mountainous Karabagh and Azerbaijan, recognizes
Karabagh and then enters into formal negotiations with it to finalize
issues of border adjustment and delineation, trade and communications,
peace and public safety.

These are but a few of the priority items that need be included in the
agenda of &’linkage’ that official Ankara has long promoted. If its
insistence is anything more than partisan puff or an escape hatch from
political accountability, then the time is ripe for laying everything
on the line, presenting in civil fashion the pre- and post-conditions
of choice, and deciding which matters can be tackled diplomatically and
which require recourse to the tribunals of law. This process alone,
without prejudice to its results, just might take the parties and
their partnership to the hope of unprecedented normalization and the
promise of a long-awaited reconciliation between their peoples.

For policymaker and pundit alike, the road to regional integration in
a new-age community of democratic values and global security, to the
Caucasus, Central Asia and Afghanistan, to energy sourcing and other
strategic priorities passes right through the long-irrelevant but
now-tectonic killing fields of old Armenia. If the future is meant to
count, no measure of NATO membership or geopolitical self-importance
or moderate-Islam grandstanding can prevent the ultimate harmony of
renaissance and realpolitik."

Obama Won’t Be Able To Resist Armenian-Jewish Lobby In Genocide Reco

OBAMA WON’T BE ABLE TO RESIST ARMENIAN-JEWISH LOBBY IN GENOCIDE RECOGNITION ISSUE

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
16.12.2009 15:31 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Even a country like Turkey will find it hard to
withdraw from Armenia-Turkey rapprochement process, according to
the chairman of Analytical Center on Globalization and Regional
Cooperation.

"Should Turkey refuse to ratify Armenia-Turkey protocols, both U.S.

President and Congress will recognize the Armenian Genocide," Stepan
Grigoryan told a news conference in Yerevan.

"Recently Turkey established closer relations with Syria and Iran, to
the detriment of Israel. In this context, U.S. Jewish lobby started
to support Armenian Genocide recognition. If previously Obama could
resist Armenian lobby in this issue, he will surely be unable to
resist if Armenian and Jewish lobbies combine efforts," he concluded.

Second Wave Of The Crisis In Armenia Is Not Likely

SECOND WAVE OF THE CRISIS IN ARMENIA IS NOT LIKELY

ARKA
Dec 15, 2009

Exclusive Interview with the IMF Resident Representative to Armenia,
Nienke Oomes, by ARKA Information Agency

ARKA: Mrs. Oomes, can we expect a revision of the IMF projections for
2009 and 2010 macroeconomic indicators in Armenia before the end of
this year?

N. Oomes: Our last projections made in September have not changed and
they are published in our latest report, which is now on our website
(). We still project that the annual GDP decline
will be about 15.6% and we expect 1.2% GDP growth in 2010. Our latest
official inflation forecast is 5.2% for end-2009, which is the average
growth rate of prices in December 2009 compared to December 2008.

However, during the last few months, inflation has increased, and in
November it already totaled 4.6%.

We hope that inflation in December will remain within the level
targeted by the CBA, although there is a risk that it could slightly
exceed the upper band of the target, which is 5.5%. According to our
projections, inflation in 2010 will also remain within the target
band (i.e., will be between 2.5% and 5.5%) and should be around 3.7%
on average.

ARKA: Earlier you mentioned that Armenia should continue to maintain an
expansionary fiscal policy (provide fiscal stimulus) under the 2010
state budget. Which should be the priority areas of using foreign
financing in order to achieve the maximum effect?

N. Oomes: The budget deficit in percent of GDP is expected to be
around 7,5% in 2009, and 6% in 2010. In our view, having a 6% deficit
in 2010 is reasonable and feasible.

On the one hand, it is important for the government to gradually reduce
the deficit, because at some point of time it will have to repay
its debts. On the other hand, the IMF advices most countries not to
reduce the deficit too sharply, because this could risk delaying or
even preventing the economic recovery.

During recession periods, it is especially important not to cut
social expenditures, because in such circumstances poor people tend
to suffer more than others. We also think that it would make sense
for the government to continue to spend money on infrastructure and
other types of investments that will in turn stimulate the economic
recovery and economic growth.

Furthermore, we think it is appropriate that the government is using
the loans from international donors to provide financing to small and
medium enterprises, because SMEs play an important role in ensuring
future growth and in fostering the diversification of the economy.

All these areas should be the priorities of the budget expenditure
policy, so that Armenia will be able to overcome the crisis in a
relatively short time.

ARKA: Is there a need to take additional measures for stabilization
of the financial sector? Please describe these measures, if any.

N. Oomes: We think that the CBA has been doing a very good job
in ensuring financial stability. Compared to other countries,
Armenia succeeded in avoiding a banking crisis. The CBA has already
strengthened banking supervision and took several measures to protect
the financial sector. Subsequently, we are satisfied with the CBA’s
financial sector policies.

ARKA: What do you think would be the share of non-performing banking
loans at the end of 2009?

N. Oomes: We are not making such projections, however, given the
existing situation, the level of non-performing loans has probably
stabilized. It recently fell from 9.3 percent in September to 8.1
percent in October.

ARKA: How effective is the crisis management policy of the Armenian
authorities? Given current trends, which should be the priority
measures in 2010?

N. Oomes: If we compare Armenia with other countries again, then the
crisis management program implemented in Armenia is quite good.

Immediately after the first signs of the crisis, the government
succeeded in attracting loans from the IMF, the World Bank, the
Asian Development Bank and the Russian government. In other words,
the authorities responded very rapidly to the emerging crisis.

Subsequently, the government has been able to largely execute the
budgeted expenditures for 2009 thanks to the US$150 million portion
of the IMF loan that was made available for budget financing, as
well as the budget support received from other sources, including
the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. This budget support
has enabled them not to cut social expenditures and to support the
most vulnerable categories of the population.

As I said before, it has been very wise of the government to not just
spend the attracted loans, but to on-lend them to businesses. First,
it is a very good idea to channel them to small and medium businesses,
since the latter can give a new impetus to growth. Second, we hope
that most of the companies who received these loans will be able to
repay them after the crisis is over, which will help the government
to repay its debts.

ARKA: Should Armenia suspend implementation of the crisis management
policies in order to prevent further accumulation of foreign debt
and fully benefit from the resumption of the global economic growth?

N. Oomes: No, we think that the government should continue its
anti-crisis policies and should continue to stimulate the economy,
at least during 2010. Generally, the IMF advises its member countries
not to suspend the anti-crisis policies too abruptly, because this
could lead to a second wave of the crisis.

To this end, we think that in 2010 it makes sense to keep the budget
deficit at a relatively high level. During a crisis, it is generally
a good idea for governments to take loans and use these to stimulate
the economy. When the crisis is over, these governments should then
start to repay these debts. Therefore, while the economy will be
recuperating in 2010, we think that it is still early to withdraw
the government stimulus during the next year.

ARKA: While it is difficult to project, would it be realistic to do
this in 2011?

N. Oomes: It is indeed difficult to make forecasts at the present
stage. However, if the economy will continue to recover at the
same rate as now, and if a second wave of the crisis is avoided,
the government should be able to stop the anti-crisis measures in 2011.

ARKA: How real is the possibility of a second wave of the crisis in
the world, and particularly in Armenia, and what should be done in
order to mitigate its impacts?

N. Oomes: Personally, I don’t think that a second wave of crisis in
Armenia is likely. As for the rest of the world, it depends on steps
that the governments of those countries will take. If governments
continue to follow the IMF’s advice and will not stop their anti-crisis
measures too quickly, then it should be possible to avoid a second
wave of the crisis in 2010. However, different economists express
different views on this issue.

Actually, the reason why it is so difficult to make economic
forecasts is that economic developments strongly depend on people’s
expectations. When people expect that a second wave of the crisis will
happen, they will stop making investments or cut their expenses and
this by itself can lead to a second wave. However, if people expect
that the economy will recover, they will increase their spending and
then the second wave of the crisis can be avoided.

ARKA: Earlier you said that, if the authorities comply with the
IMF conditionality on enhancing the economy, the authorities can
use another US$150 million from the IMF loan for financing the 2010
budget. Which are the targets that the authorities should achieve
under the IMF conditionality?

N. Oomes: The conditionality is reflected in our report which is
now available on the IMF web site (). One of the
major targets for the upcoming months is to ensure the continuity
of tax administration reforms. In particular, we expect progress in
implementing risk-based auditing of VAT refund claims.

In our view, it is very important that the tax authorities audit
only those VAT refund claims that have a high risk of being fake
or fraudulent. However, up to now, all VAT refund claims are being
audited, which is exerting excessive pressure on businesses.

Another condition under the IMF program is that, before the end of this
year, the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs should submit, with
the help of the World Bank, their strategy to improve the targeting
of social safety nets, in particular, the family benefits program, so
that those who really need those benefits will all be able to get them.

Another goal is to move taxation of oil and tobacco products from
the presumptive into the general taxation field. This is an important
step and we have already spent much effort in this direction. For a
long time, fuel and cigarettes have been taxed in a priviliged way,
while we think that these products should be taxed in the same way as
others. The government has undertaken a commitment to introduce the
necessary legislative changes in this sector by the end of this year.

All these measures are preconditions for the authorities to receive
the next tranche of the IMF loan.

ARKA: Given moderate recovery trends, what should be the CBA foreign
exchange policies in 2010?

N. Oomes: We have always advised Armenia to stick to a floating
exchange rate. This, however, does not necessarily mean that the CBA
should not intervene in the foreign exchange market at all. We think
it is reasonable that the CBA will intervene in the market from time to
time in order to prevent unexpected sharp daily exchange rate changes.

At the same time, it is important that the CBA does not resist the
overall objective exchange rate trends and follows them. In the
beginning of this year, there were clear pressures for the foreign
exchange rate to depreciate, because of the large drop in remittances,
exports, etc, and it was clear that the CBA could not resist this
depreciation. During the next year, it is possible that there will
be pressures for the exchange rate to appreciate, when global growth
resumes, in which case the CBA should also not resist these pressures.

In our view, the exchange rate should be determined by the market,
based on foreign exchange inflows and outflows. However, I repeat
that occasional interference of the CBA is justified in order to
prevent sharp short-term exchange rate fluctuations.

ARKA: Do you think that Armenian foreign debt is sustainable and can
be retained within 50 percent of GDP?

N. Oomes: The Armenian foreign debt level has indeed increased
significantly, but should still be sustainable and is expected to
remain below 50 percent. In 2008, gross state debt, which includes
the government and the CBA debt, was around 16% of GDP, but it grew
sharply in 2009 and is expect to reach around 37%. Given the attracted
borrowings, we expect that the debt will grow further in 2010, up to
44%. The peak of the deficit will be reached in 2011, when the debt
will be equal to almost 47% of GDP.

The debt should therefore remain below 50% of GDP, unless new large
loans will be contracted.

ARKA: Do you think there is a need for attracting new loans by Armenia
in 2010?

N. Oomes: No, we think that the government has already contracted
sufficient loans, a significant portion of which has not been received
yet and will be disbursed in 2010 or 2011. Subsequently, we don’t
think that there is currently a need for new loans.

ARKA: Since your mission in Armenia will soon finish, we would like
to know your opinion about changes in our country that you witnessed.

N. Oomes: I am very sad that I have to leave Armenia, because I
very much enjoyed living and working here. Both from a personal and
a professional point of view, I have spent three very interesting
years here, and have witnessed substantial changes in the economy of
the country.

When I first arrived in Armenia in August 2006, the most serious
problem for the country was the huge inflow of remittances as a
result of which the dram was appreciating. As a result, there was a
significant "dramatization" of the economy (people converting their
dollars back into dram).

Currently, the situation has changed radically: now the problem is
that not enough money is coming into the country, as a result of which
the exchange rate has depreciated and people again have changed their
drams back into dollars.

However, I am convinced that the Armenian economy will overcome
all difficulties, as was always the case during the history of this
country. The Armenians are proud, hard working, and entrepeneurial
people and they are successful in any country where they live.

Therefore, I am convinced that Armenia will continue to do well in
the long run.

www.imf.org/yerevan
www.imf.org/yerevan

Winners Of Armenian Open Programming Competition Announced

WINNERS OF ARMENIAN OPEN PROGRAMMING COMPETITION ANNOUNCED

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
14.12.2009 22:08 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The winners of the Armenian open programming
competition initiated by RA Economy Ministry, Enterprise Incubator
Foundation (EIF), Microsoft Armenia and Russian-Armenian (Slavonic)
University were announced on December 14.

The main winner, Eduard Piliposyan was awarded an HP laptop and AMD
200 thousand. Hayk Saribekyan and Mihran Hovsepyan were awarded AMD
200 and 100 thousand respectively.

In the team event, Eduard Piliposyan, Aram Shatakhchyan and Zaven
Grigoryan won AMD 360 thousand. The teams coming 2nd and 3rd won AMD
270 and 150 thousand respectively.

Turkish Ambassador To Azerbaijan: In Order To Ratify The Protocols,

TURKISH AMBASSADOR TO AZERBAIJAN: IN ORDER TO RATIFY THE PROTOCOLS, WE EXPECT IMPROVEMENT IN THE PROBLEM OF THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

APA
15 Dec 2009 14:55
BAKU

Baku. Viktoria Dementieva – APA. "We expect improvement in the
problem of Nagorno Karabakh, the occupied territories. If there is
an improvement in this issue, there will be an improvement in the
protocols signed between Turkey and Armenia," Turkish ambassador to
Azerbaijan Hulusi Kilic told journalists, APA reports.

Asked when Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov would visit
Turkey, the diplomat said the date of the visit had not been fixed,
but it would take place by the end of the year. A number of bilateral
issues, including cancel of visa regime will be discussed during
the visit.