DM: Armenia not to become target for international terrorists

Pan Armenian News

RA DEFENSE MINISTER: ARMENIA NOT TO BECOME TARGET FOR INTERNATIONAL
TERRORISTS

08.07.2005 07:46

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Secretary of the National Security Service under the
Armenian President, Defense Minister Serge Sargsian doubts that Armenia can
become a target for international terrorists. When commenting on the
statement spread by the `Secret Organization of al Qaeda in Europe”, which
contained threat for the crusader-states, Serge Sargsian said `Armenia has
never considered itself to be a crusader-state. He also stated that the law
enforcers keep the situation under control and noted the importance of
Armenia’s participation in the anti-terror coalition.

Gran Consiglio riconosce genocidio armeno

SwissInfo – Svizzera
5 luglio 2005 15.41

VD: Gran Consiglio riconosce genocidio armeno

LOSANNA – Il Gran Consiglio vodese ha formalmente riconosciuto oggi
il genocidio armeno. L’esecutivo, che ritiene questo passo
“inadeguato”, ha espresso la sua disapprovazione per bocca del
consigliere di Stato Jean-Claude Mermoud.

“Le sensibilità sono tuttora a fior di pelle”, ha sottolineato
Mermoud, rammendando che il riconoscimento del genocidio armeno da
parte del Consiglio nazionale nel dicembre 2003 aveva provocato il
rinvio della visita della ministra degli esteri Micheline Calmy-Rey
in Turchia.

I deputati non lo hanno seguito ed hanno approvato a larga
maggioranza la risoluzione, riassunta in una sola frase: “Il Gran
consiglio del canton Vaud riconosce il genocidio del popolo armeno
del 1915 e onora la memoria delle vittime”. La risoluzione – hanno
sottolineato svariati oratori – non è diretta contro il popolo turco
o le autorità di questo Paese, ma “contro l’oblio”.

Georgia’s Energy and Fuel Minister puts off visit to Armenia

Armenpress

GEORGIA’S ENERGY AND FUEL MINISTER PUTS OFF VISIT TO ARMENIA

YEREVAN, JULY 5, ARMENPRESS: Georgia’s fuel and energy ministry said
today minister Nika Gilauri’s visit to Armenia that was expected to take
place today, was postponed, saying the postponement was not caused by a
Monday breakdown at Imereti power transmission line that sent Tbilisi and
several eastern provinces of the country in a 60-minute blackout.
Gilauri was supposed to discuss in Yerevan the start of construction of a
new power line from Armenia, which he said on June 30 would kick off in a
month. He said the new power line with a capacity of 330 Kwatt/h will become
an alternative electricity supply source eliminating Georgia’s full
independence on Kavkasioni power line. The construction of a new power line-
Gardabani-Hrazdan, will be mainly funded by Georgia’s government, which is
set to release some $12 million for this.

Abu Dhabi: FM Under Secretary receives US Ambassador

Emirates News Agency
July 5, 2005 Tuesday 3:22 PM EST

FM Under Secretary receives US Ambassador

Abu Dhabi

Foreign Ministry Under Secretary, Abdullah Rashid Al Nu’aimi,
received here Tuesday at his office US Ambassador, Michele Sison..

During the meeting, they reviewed the latest developments in the
region and bilateral ties between the UAE and the US..

The director of the Ministry’s Department of Asian and African
Affairs, Ahmed Abdullah Al Musalli, also received the deputy director
of the Department of Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia at
the Singaporean foreign ministry, Desmond Wee.

During the meeting, they discussed a number of issues of mutual
interest to the two countries..

The director of the Foreign Ministry’s Department of Organisations
and Conferences, Yakoub Yusuf Al Hossani, received Armenian
Ambassador, Dr. Arshak Poladian and discussed with him a number of
issues dealing with international organisations..

NKR: Defence Minister’s Comment

DEFENCE MINISTER’S COMMENT

Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
05 July 05

AA: `Mr. Minister, recently the mass media have added various, often
controversial suppositions to the numerous comments and rumours on the
June21 incident and its causes. Certain publications attempt to
politicize the incident and relate it to the parliamentary election.
What is your opinion?’ NKR Minister of Defence Seyran Ohanian: `You
are right. The comments int he massmedia on the June 21 incident
ascribe an emphasized political context to it, invent certain
statements uttered by me, etc., whereas the reality is different. As
an officer and citizen I should inform our society that the cause of
the incident was the abusive words of our former soldier Pavel
Manoukian addressed to the Defence Army, my friends in arms and me
personally, which naturally cannot be cited here. What is more,
personal insult does not matter as much as the abusive words addressed
to the Defence Army and my friends of arms. There are values which
cannot be profaned. No one has the right, especially the one who is
well-aware of the way our friends passed. As an Armenian man, Armenian
soldier, as a person who felt how high the price for victory was I
could not remain calm when our army and the command were vilified. I
think it is clear to everybody that that no political context can be
found here, especially against a political party which has worked for
the nation for so many years -the Armenian Revolutionary Federation.
Like us the soldiers the Federation has always upheld the honour of
the Armenian officers and the army. I could not, therefore, tolerate
such behaviour of a former officer in personal relationships. I donot
think that the insult to the Defence Army, my friends and personally
me can have any relation, even the vaguest one, to any political force
operating in the Armenian reality, since my friends in arms and me are
able to appreciate the political values of our country. It is also
apparent that ascribing anti-ARF moods to us and relating the incident
with the election are groundless. A simple truth can be deduced: there
is no need to politicize what should not be politicized. I assure that
the incident was a matter of honour, since for an officer honour and
fatherland are of the same importance.’

AA.
05-07-2005

Identity thieves prey on your mail

Los Angeles Daily News, CA
Pasadena Star-News, CA
Whittier Daily News, CA
San Gabriel Valley Tribune, CA
July 4 2005

Identity thieves prey on your mail

Authorities urge residents to be on guard with their postal
deliveries

By Josh Kleinbaum Staff Writer

Months after moving from Santa Monica to New York City, a 32-year-old
woman received a letter from a credit card company thanking her for
being such a good customer.
One problem: She never had an account with that company.

Kris, who asked that her last name not be used, soon received a bill
saying she owed the company $9,000.

Like nearly 1,000 Los Angeles residents every month, Kris was a
victim of identity theft. Someone else opened a handful of credit
cards in her name and took advantage of her good credit rating,
accumulating more than $50,000 in debt. Like many identity-theft
victims, Kris’s problem began in her own mailbox.

“It was a friend of mine, an ex-business partner,” Kris said. “I
moved back East, and he moved into my old apartment. He started
getting into my old mail. He’d get those applications that they send
you, open this card now, and he started filling them out.”

Identify theft is one of the fastest-growing crimes in the nation,
particularly popular among Armenian and Russian organized crime
groups in Glendale and the eastern San Fernando Valley, officials
said. With more people shredding their personal information before
putting it in the trash, some of the culprits — like Kris’ former
business partner — find the information necessary to commit the
crime in a mailbox, before it ever reaches the intended recipient.

The Los Angeles Police Department receives an estimated 850 to 950
identity-theft reports per month, including 400 in the San Fernando
Valley, officials said. Because most identity-theft victims do not
know how the culprit received their personal information, officials
don’t know what percentage of cases begin with stolen mail, but
detectives working on identity-theft cases believe the number is on
the rise.

“We’re seeing more usage of the Postal Service to commit identity
theft,” said Detective John Barragan, who serves on an identity-theft
task force sponsored by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

“People drive up and down, following the mail carrier, looking for
credit card statements, bank statements, anything with a name, Social
Security number, date of birth and account number.”

As identity theft has become more commonplace, so has mail theft,
according to the Postal Inspection Service.

The service made 6,618 arrests for mail theft in the 2004 fiscal
year, up from 5,175 two years earlier. Since November, it has made
4,041 arrests.

Mail theft “tends to increase during the summer months, because
people go out of town on vacation,” said Postal Inspector Yvonne
Guerrero. “It’s been a bigger problem overall, though.”

In December, a man robbed a postal carrier at gunpoint in Mission
Hills, taking the carrier’s mail. The Postal Inspection Service
offered a $50,000 reward for information leading to the apprehension
of the gunman, but he is still at large.

Mail thieves target homes in the Hollywood Hills and the affluent
areas of the Valley, officials said, where mailboxes are often at the
bottom of a driveway, unlocked and out of sight from the house,
officials said. Identity thieves look for financial statements,
preapproved credit card applications and anything that might contain
a check.

“There are other ways you can make payments than sending a check,”
said Sheila Gordon, director of victim services for the Identity
Theft Resource Center. “You become very vulnerable at that point.

“People can get the routing number off the check and start
duplicating checks. They’re going to look just as authentic. The next
thing you know, your bank account is drained.”

Gordon and police officials said people should take precautions to
avoid becoming a victim, such as using locking mailboxes, disposing
of junk mail in safe places and regularly checking credit reports for
unusual activity.

For victims, the theft can turn into a nightmare. Credit ratings can
be ruined, and many credit companies and collection agencies are
hesitant to remove items from a credit report.

“It was a huge headache, dealing with it,” Kris said. “I would say it
was like a full-time job. It took thousands of hours, and it’s still
not resolved.”

CR: Commemorating the Armenian Genocide of 1915-1923…

Congressional Record
29 June 2005
Whereas the 20th century was the bloodiest in history and saw the
application of the tools of the modern industrial state to mass killings
which have come to be called genocide; (Introduced in House)

HCON 195 IH
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 195
Commemorating the Armenian Genocide of 1915-1923, urging the Government of
the Republic of Turkey to acknowledge the culpability of its predecessor
state, the Ottoman Empire, for the Armenian Genocide and engage in
rapprochement with the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian people, and
supporting the accession of Turkey to the European Union if Turkey meets
certain criteria.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 29, 2005
Mr. SCHIFF submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred
to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Commemorating the Armenian Genocide of 1915-1923, urging the Government of
the Republic of Turkey to acknowledge the culpability of its predecessor
state, the Ottoman Empire, for the Armenian Genocide and engage in
rapprochement with the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian people, and
supporting the accession of Turkey to the European Union if Turkey meets
certain criteria.
Whereas the 20th century was the bloodiest in history and saw the
application of the tools of the modern industrial state to mass killings
which have come to be called genocide;
Whereas 20th century genocides have included the Armenian Genocide, the
Holocaust, the Cambodian Genocide, and the Rwandan Genocide;
Whereas the Government of Sudan is currently engaged in a genocide against
the people of Darfur, Sudan;
Whereas the consequences of these genocides continue to affect all humanity,
especially those who have been its victims;
Whereas only by acknowledging responsibility and reconciling with the
victims can a nation or people that committed genocide fully return to the
community of nations;
Whereas the Armenian Genocide was the first genocide of the 20th century;
Whereas the Armenian Genocide was conceived and carried out by the Ottoman
Empire from 1915 to 1923, prior to the establishment of the Republic of
Turkey;
Whereas in August 1914, the Ottoman Government formed a paramilitary
organization called the Special Organization;
Whereas the Special Organization created units called `butcher battalions’,
which were made up of violent criminals released from prison, to carry out
the extermination of the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire;
Whereas in February 1915, the Ottoman Government ordered Armenian men
serving in the army disarmed and organized into forced labor groups;
Whereas on the night of April 23-24, 1915, hundreds of Armenian
intellectuals and community leaders were summarily arrested in
Constantinople;
Whereas this was the first of a series of roundups of Armenian politicians,
priests, scientists, lawyers, doctors, and writers of the Ottoman Empire,
most of whom were killed soon after;
Whereas the first mass deportations began in late March 1915 in the region
of Cilicia, on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea, according to an extensive
plan of deportation and elimination of the Armenian population of the
Ottoman Empire that was prepared by Talat Pasha, the head of the government;
Whereas notices of deportation were posted in public places and the news
announced publicly in the streets of Armenian towns and villages;
Whereas the Ottoman Government’s campaign resulted in the deportation of
nearly 2,000,000 Armenians, of whom 1,500,000 men, women, and children were
killed, 500,000 survivors were expelled from their homes, and which
succeeded in the elimination of the over 2,500-year presence of Armenians in
their historic homeland;
Whereas there are numerous contemporaneous documentations of the Ottoman
Government’s campaign against the Armenians, including extensive accounts in
Western newspapers and government documents in the national archives of
Austria, France, Germany, Great Britain, Russia, the United States, and the
Vatican;
Whereas this documentation unequivocally describes the systematic murder of
the Armenian people and the destruction of Armenian life within the Ottoman
Empire;
Whereas Henry Morgenthau Sr., the United States Ambassador to the Ottoman
Empire, sent a cable to the United States State Department in 1915:
`Deportation of and excesses against peaceful Armenians is increasing and
from harrowing reports of eye witnesses [sic] it appears that a campaign of
race extermination is in progress under a pretext of reprisal against
rebellion.’;
Whereas Abram Elkus, who succeeded Morgenthau as United States Ambassador in
1916, sent a cable to Washington that the Ottoman Turks were continuing an
`. . . unchecked policy of extermination through starvation, exhaustion, and
brutality of treatment’;
Whereas in 1920, the Communists came to power in Armenia following an
invasion by the Red Army;
Whereas Armenia was part of the Soviet Union for the next 70 years;
Whereas the Republic of Armenia is working toward democracy, the rule of
law, and a viable free market economy since obtaining its freedom from
Soviet rule in 1991;
Whereas the Republic of Armenia is a member of the Council of Europe, the
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization’s Partnership for Peace;
Whereas the Republic of Armenia is a friend and ally of the United States;
Whereas the modern Republic of Turkey was founded in 1923;
Whereas the Republic of Turkey abolished Ottoman institutions, including the
sultanate and caliphate, and underwent a period of modernization and
westernization;
Whereas the Republic of Turkey has been a long-standing member of numerous
international organizations, including the Council of Europe, the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization, and the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe;
Whereas the Republic of Turkey is a friend and ally of the United States;
Whereas the Republic of Turkey, because of its position at the crossroads of
Europe, the Caucasus, Central Asia, and the Middle East, is well positioned
to play a leading role in shaping developments in Europe and beyond;
Whereas the United States has an interest in the stability and economic
development of Turkey and the Caucasus region;
Whereas the Republic of Turkey desires to join the European Union;
Whereas the European Union and the Republic of Turkey will begin accession
talks in October 2005;
Whereas former Secretary of State Colin Powell welcomed the announcement of
accession talks in December 2004 by saying that the United States is
`confident that the accession process, and Turkey’s eventual membership in
the European Union, will bring great benefits to Turkey and to the European
Union . . . [t]he Turkish people have much to look forward to . . . [a]
Turkey that is firmly anchored in Europe and sharing European values will be
a positive force for prosperity and democracy . . . [t]his is good for
Turkey, for the broader European region, and for the United States, and that
is why successive United States administrations have consistently supported
Turkey’s European aspirations’;
Whereas the European Union in 1993 established criteria for membership for
Central and Eastern European countries that require that the candidate
country must have achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy,
the rule of law, human rights, and respect for and protection of minorities,
the existence of a functioning market economy as well as the capacity to
cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union, and the
ability to take on the obligations of membership, including adherence to the
aims of political, economic, and monetary union;
Whereas Republic of Turkey is making progress in many of these areas, as
reflected in the decision to open accession negotiations;
Whereas in order to meet the accession criteria regarding the respect for
and treatment of minorities, the Republic of Turkey must acknowledge the
culpability of its predecessor state, the Ottoman Empire, for the Armenian
Genocide;
Whereas the Republic of Turkey has consistently refused to acknowledge the
culpability of its predecessor state, the Ottoman Empire, for the Armenian
Genocide;
Whereas the European Parliament passed a resolution in June 1987 stating
that the killing of `Armenians living in the territory of the Ottoman Empire
constitute genocide within the meaning of the Convention on the Prevention
and the Punishment of the Crime of Genocide adopted by the United Nations
General Assembly on 9 December 1948′;
Whereas in the 1987 Resolution the European Parliament stated that `the
refusal by the present Turkish Government to acknowledge the genocide
against the Armenian people committed by [the Ottoman] government, [is] an
insurmountable obstacle to consideration of the possibility of Turkey’s
accession to the Community’;
Whereas the European Parliament, in a resolution passed in November 2000 on
Turkey’s progress toward accession to the European Union, called upon Turkey
`to give fresh support to the Armenian minority, as an important part of
Turkish society, in particular by public recognition of the genocide which
that minority suffered before the establishment of the modern state of
Turkey’;
Whereas the European Parliament passed a resolution in February 2002
reiterating its recognition of the Armenian Genocide and noting `that the
Turkish regime after the First World War had several of those responsible
for the genocide severely punished’;
Whereas the European Parliament, in its December 2004 parliamentary report
on Turkey’s progress toward accession to the European Union, urged Turkey to
`promote the process of reconciliation with the Armenian people by
acknowledging the genocide’ and called on the European Council and
Commission to demand that Turkey `formally acknowledge the historic reality’
of the Genocide;
Whereas the national parliaments of several members of the European Union
and a number of other national parliaments have passed resolutions
recognizing the Armenian Genocide;
Whereas in recent years there has been an increasing willingness of Turkish
academics, journalists, and others to openly discuss the Armenian Genocide,
but this has often been met with hostility by the Government of the Republic
of Turkey;
Whereas a group of historians organized and scheduled an academic conference
relating to the Armenian Genocide to take place starting June 1, 2005, at
Bosporus University in Istanbul, but the Government of the Republic of
Turkey successfully pressured the university to cancel the conference; and
Whereas the Republic of Turkey’s acknowledgement of the actions of the
Ottoman Government, including the terrible tragedy of the Armenian Genocide,
will herald a new chapter in the history of the region and usher in a new
era of economic, social, and political progress: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That
Congress–
(1) commemorates the victims of the Armenian Genocide of 1915-1923;
(2) calls upon the President to commemorate the victims of the Armenian
Genocide on behalf of the people and Government of the United States;
(3) calls upon the Government of the Republic of Turkey to acknowledge the
culpability of its predecessor state, the Ottoman Empire, for the Armenian
Genocide;
(4) calls upon the Government of the Republic of Turkey to promote
rapprochement with the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian people and
realize a just resolution;
(5) supports the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Turkey
if Turkey–
(A) acknowledges the culpability of its predecessor state, the Ottoman
Empire for the Armenian Genocide;
(B) pursues rapprochement with the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian
people; and
(C) meets the other criteria for accession as determined by the European
Union;
(6) calls upon the European Union to look with favor upon any actions by the
Government of the Republic of Turkey to acknowledge the culpability of its
predecessor state, the Ottoman Empire, for the Armenian Genocide and engage
in rapprochement with the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian people;
(7) stands ready to assist the Republic of Turkey and the Republic of
Armenia and the Armenian people in this process; and
(8) calls upon the President, the Secretary of State, the European Union,
and others to assist the Republic of Turkey and the Republic of Armenia and
the Armenian people in this process.

Armenian DM dismisses Azeri statement on Karabakh autonomy

(Corrected)Armenian defence minister dismisses Azeri statement on
Karabakh autonomy

Mediamax news agency
1 Jul 05

(Correcting the year in the last paragraph to “1998”. A corrected
version of the item follows.)

Yerevan, 1 July: Armenian Defence Minister Serzh Sarkisyan has
described as “empty words” the statement of the Azerbaijani leadership
about its readiness to grant Nagornyy Karabakh the “highest decree of
autonomy” and some “preferential conditions”.

The Armenian defence minister said that similar proposals “could have
a certain value 20 year ago if they had been submitted by [Azerbaijani
ex-President] Heydar Aliyev,” Mediamax new agency reports.

Sarkisyan also said that the Armenian leadership has not deviated from
the principles of settling the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict which were
voiced when they came to power in 1998 and described as groundless the
statements that Yerevan keeps to “a defeatist position”.

724 taxi firms operate across Armenia

724 TAXI FIRMS OPERATE ACROSS ARMENIA

Armenpress

YEREVAN, JUNE 30, ARMENPRESS: Some 724 taxi companies were operating
across Armenia in the first five months of the year transporting
passengers by 4,182 cars. Deputy chief of taxation service, Robert
Kocharian, said today 291 companies with 2,476 cars worked in
Yerevan. Overall they paid 91 million drams in five months as fixed
taxes. Last year there were 607 companies with 3,520 cars which paid
137 million in aggregate taxes.

Robert Kocharian said this was a rapidly developing business,
predicting emergence of new companies soon, not ruling out that
part of the business avoids taxes. “We have not registered serious
violations here,” he said. The amount of monthly tax from each car
in Yerevan is 6,800 (around $15), in Gyumri and Vanadzor it is 6,200
drams and 5,600 drams in other regions.

Iranian and Armenian provinces cooperation opportunities discussed

IRANIAN AND ARMENIAN PROVINCES COOPERATION OPPORTUNITIES DISCUSSED

Pan Armenian News
30.06.2005 05:07

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Prospects of development of cooperation between
Iranian and Armenian provinces were discussed at the meeting of
Vice-Governor of Iranian Eastern Azerbaijan province Mohammad-Taki
Pakzad and Governor of Armenian Syunik region Suren Khachatryan. The
parties also discussed matters of holding a meeting of the Joint
Committee for Cooperation of border provinces of the two countries. In
the course of the meeting S. Khachatryan indicated the important role
of the Iranian province of Eastern Azerbaijan in development of the
bilateral cooperation and said he was for expansion of contacts
between representatives of private sectors of the Armenian and
Iranian economies. In his turn Mr. Pakzad remarked the importance
of further development of cooperation between the two countries in
cargo transportation, industry, trade and tourism. He also said it was
necessary to alleviate the regime of movement of Iranian and Armenian
citizens in the territories of the two countries, Irna reported.