Armenia To Present Anti-Smoking Report To WHO

ARMENIA TO PRESENT ANTI-SMOKING REPORT TO WHO

Armenpress
Oct 02 2006

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 2, ARMENPRESS: Next year Armenia will have to
present to the World Health Organization (WHO) its first report on
implementation of commitments it has assumed by joining the Framework
Convention on Anti-Tobacco Struggle. Armenia ratified the Framework
Convention in 2004.

According to Alexander Bazarchian, the coordinator of the national
anti-tobacco campaign, Armenia’s main commitments set by the Convention
are the passage of an anti-tobacco legislation, enforcement of a
full ban on tobacco advertisement before 2010 and the gradual rise
of tobacco products prices and besides 30 percent of cigarette packs
must have a notice about the smoking hazards.

So far Armenia has passed a law on restrictions to sale, consumption
and use of tobacco products. Local law on advertising bans street
advertisement of tobacco goods. According to Armenian doctors, the
number of smokers in Armenia is on the constant rise Some experts
estimate that more than half of all males are smokers. They say the
number of smoking women also increases, the bulk of them in Yerevan.

The World Health Organization estimates that 63.7 percent of Armenian
men are smokers – the highest rate in Europe. By comparison, an
estimated 60 percent of men in neighboring Georgia are smokers and
31.2 percent in Azerbaijan.

Armenia’s first ever restrictions on smoking in public places came
into force on March 2, 2005, prohibiting smoking in hospitals,
cultural and education institutions and public transportation.

There are no mechanisms in place for enforcing the measures, and to
date there is little evidence of compliance with the restrictions.

Visite De Jacques Chirac Au Patriarche De Tous Les Armeniens

VISITE DE JACQUES CHIRAC AU PATRIARCHE DE TOUS LES ARMENIENS

Agence France Presse
1 octobre 2006 dimanche 6:21 AM GMT

Le president francais Jacques Chirac a rendu visite dimanche au
Patriarche Supreme et Catholicos de tous les Armeniens, Sa Saintete
Karenine II, dernière etape de sa visite d’Etat en Armenie.

"En souvenir de cette emouvante visite dans le coeur spirituel de
l’Armenie et du grand peuple armenien", a ecrit a l’issue de la visite
le chef de l’Etat francais sur le livre d’or.

M. Chirac, qui etait accompagne de son epouse Bernadette pour cette
visite, devait regagner Paris dimanche.

L’Eglise apostolique armenienne est l’une des Eglises d’Orient et
elle est dirigee par le Catholicos de tous les Armeniens, Sa Saintete
Karenine II, 55 ans, qui a ete intronise en 1999.

Le christianisme, arrive très tôt en Armenie, y est devenu religion
d’Etat en 301. En 555, l’Eglise armenienne a opere un schisme, pour
des raisons theologiques mais aussi politiques, après son Concile
de Chalcedoine. Rome a leve au 17e siècle l’anathème qui frappait
cette Eglise.

En 1996, le pape Jean-Paul II et le Catholicos de tous les Armeniens
ont signe une "declaration commune sur la Christologie", qui enterre
les querelles theologiques, sans trancher sur la question de l’exercice
de la primaute du pape.

–Boundary_(ID_8ol2pD5Wtk9Rm1IBIu6jig)–

Turkey’s Strategic Blunder

TURKEY’S STRATEGIC BLUNDER
By Dr Fereydun Hilmi

Kurdish Media, UK
Sept 26 2006

At the end of the First World War, Kamal Attaturk was able to save
the rump of the Ottoman Empire from British and French occupation.

His springboard point was Anatolia where he was able to persuade the
Kurds in north Kurdistan to join forces with him and reject British
intrigues among them aimed at chipping away further land from what
had remained of the great sick empire.

The British duped the Kurds by first encouraging them to seek
independence and supporting the idea and pouring much money into
Slemanî and the Kurdish parts of Iraq. For nearly 4 years they carried
on establishing a Kurdish administration andarmy and trained them to
protect their areas simply because they were unable to send an army
to do so as a result of their economic troubles and losses in the
occupation of southern and middle Iraq. Kurdistan’s mountains reminded
them of their disadters in Afghanistan and India; in Particular the
difficulties of fighting locals in places like the Khyber Pass.

Therefore they wanted to achieve the same result and prevent the
Turks form reclaiming land which had belonged to the Ottoman Empire
administratively but not subjugated by Turkish army forces. Most of
Kurdistan was ruled by Kurdish proxies with local armed men until
the British arrived in Kifri. Once the local chief Sheikh Mahmud
heard of this he invited the British to come to Slemanî in what he
considered was a card to play against the Ottomans so that he might
have bargained with it.

The British who were aware of this insisted that he should work for
his upkeep and support but his natural instinct was anti-British and
pro-Turkish. Yet Attaturk ignored his approaches and tried instead to
use him in his struggle to save as much of what he considered to be his
national homeland as possible. Sheikh Mahmud and the rest of the Mosul
Wilayet ended up as a juicy bite for the British colonial stomach.

The British who were really only interested in the oil-rich areas
of the Mosul Wilayet easily sacrificed the Kurds of Anatolia and
signed agreements with Turkey exchanging the Mosul Wilayet which they
had sneakily occupied during the armistice just after the war had
stopped. And with that Turkey was cocooned into a hard nationalistic
shell which it was to remain in for nearly a hundred years.

Britain was a tired and economically warn out power who had suffered
along with its French ally greatly at the hands of the Germans. It
was probably as weak and tired as the Turks if not more. Yet, today
Turkey is a third world country while Britain is a super power with a
thriving economy and English is the standard language throughout the
world. Britain and now the United States have fingers in every pie
all around the world while Turkey remained isolated and lacking all
forms of influence in even the closest nations right on its borders.

People five thousand miles away from Britain speak English as a second
language who once spoke Turkish instead.

The Ottoman Empire lasted some six centuries reaching the height of
civilization and scientific progress and many nations such as Kurds,
Armenians, Greeks, Arabs, Albanians and others from the Middle and
Far East, Asia and African nations served to advance its culture and
power throughout a huge chunk of the world and enrich the central
power house at Istanbul. The Turkish people were truly a minority who
started as fighting tribes, adopted Islam and Middle Eastern Culture as
a result of which Anatolia became the home of a huge thriving empire.

All that disappeared because of Attaturk’s Xenophobic attitude towards
all the nations that had helped his race reach the positions they
had. Proof of this lies in the fact that once the Kurds, Armenians,
Greeks and Arabs were alienated Turkey became and remained a poor
mediocre and backward state unable to sustain itself without iys
subservient position within NATO.

Yet, Turkey had a great opportunity throughout the twentieth century
to occupy a better position among these nations than does Britain
and the west. We must remember that the nations surrounding Turkey
practice the same religion, are of a mixture of local races, share
the geography as well as six centuries of togetherness as parts of
the Ottoman Empire. But despite the fact that they shared none of
those characteristics with Britain and the latter’s great physical
distance, it was the west who captured the hearts and minds of the
Middle East nations, not by having their interests at heart but via
many sly and devious methods including tying them up with economic
contracts the greatest benefits of which return to the west.

Western culture has also begun to despise eastern and oriental cultures
to such an extent that they are now treating Islam (the main culture
of some 1.5 billion people) as their grand enemy. This is not just
a feeling or a suspicion but a fact which nobody can deny today.

Unfortunately all that Turkey is offering is more subservience to the
will of its sponsors and denial of its geopolitical position and more
and more copycat culture from the west.

There are those who have been brainwashed into thinking that
civilization and technical progress can only come from the west. If
the Americans or the western nations do not invent it then it is not
possible. Some would even link Japanese and Chinese technology to what
they must have copied from the west easily and conveniently forgetting
that China and the Middle East were the main source of all scientific,
logical and technological advancement in the world.

Science and Technology do not have a nationality or a race while oil,
gas and other natural resources do. Turkey gave up its position as
the most modern capital of eastern culture and became a follower of
the west rather than the leader of the east. It has been struggling
to enter the European and Christian world believing that it is now
destined to exist on the periphery not realizing that it would have
to be and remain a fringe nation deprived of major progress.

In the beginning of the twentieth century my father, uncle and many
other Kurds and Iraqis were educated in Istanbul. I know that their
education was superb and my father also a scientist had a magnificent
command of mathematics and physics. In true ancient Greek style,
they were taught not just science but philosophy, history the arts
and everything worth learning. I was educated in the UK and although
the British education system is superior to many I had to learn all
those other subjects by my self.

Attaturk’s Turkey became isolated from its natural and geopolitical
environment while all around it the British and French were forming
alliances with what should have been Turkey’s historic allies until
all that was left was a small part of Cyprus only because they were
Turks. This deprived Turkey of mutual exchange of wealth, knowledge,
know-how and all other forms of economic ties with the erstwhile
members of the Ottoman Empire.

Turkey’s policies towards the Kurds were Britain’s best protection
against the rejuvenation of the nation and the wall which kept it
from Iraq, Syria and the previously united nations of the Ottoman
Empire. Instead of behaving like a sour grape and sulking with hatred
Turkey should have done the exact opposite by revising its old policies
and trying to mend fences – it should have been doing all it could
to keep the borders soft and temporary. It should have extended its
hands to all its Muslim and Middle-Eastern brothers to form a new
alliance (a commonwealth of ex-Ottoman nations) – not alienate them
and isolate itself.

Kurdistan should have been a great ally and a strategic depth for
Turkey and not a sore wound in its side. Yet the Kurd’s struggle has
not stopped for one day simply to gain equality as citizens of the
country. For some reason it seems the Turkish mind does not work as
efficiently on its own and needs the inspiration of the other nations
around them. I believe that the Turks, Kurds, Arabs, Armenians and
optionally Greeks can reclaim the ground by making a complete change
of policy starting from Turkey.

Below I will state a suggestion which I hope the Turkish leadership
will read.

1. Turkey should pass a law completely banning racism in the country
2. Offer the Kurds all rights in the Turkish state and concentrate
on the region which is wealthy as well as lacking of investment
and development.

3. Keep foreign investments in Turkey and in Kurdistan to the minimum

4. Be humane enough to admit mistakes of the Ottomans towards the
Armenians and stop discrimination and persecution against all the
citizens of Turkey 5. Offer a friendly apology for maltreating the
Ottoman nations and promise a new era of brotherhood and equality. It
would be a great gesture of good will if the name of the nation was
changed to a more representative name covering its multinational
nature.

6. Establish the best possible ties with its neighbours, Iran,
a yet-to-be-liberated Iraq and in particular the Kurdish part.

7. Abandon the application to become an unloved and unwanted little
step-brother if Europe. Thus firmly, proudly and unapologetically
placing its foot in Asia 8. Establish the best possible ties with the
Arabs 9. Abandon NATO because its ties with that imperial organisation
preclude it from re-establishing itself as a major Asiatic power.

10. Seek economic contracts with all former members of the Ottoman
Empire 11. Establish universities for the education of African, Asian,
Arab and other citizens of the world who do not have the opportunity
to get western or even local education.

12. Form close ties with Iran which is surviving very well without
any NATOI and EU links.

13. Form the best possible links with the rich and progressive South
American Nations.

14. Completely wrench itself away from supporting the aggressive
and war-like actions of Israel and the Americans 15. Reposition the
political attitude of the country towards the greater good of the
nations of the region and in this way offer Turkey’s own vision of
the Middle East.

It is by far better for Turkey and the Middle East to be masters
of their own decisions than lackeys and sycophantic extras on the
backside of someone else.

The present Government of Turkey seems to have a mindset close to
the above analysis but seems too timid in going all the way. I have
written about Turkish society today in the past on KurdishMedia.com,
in particular about the lack of scientific and technological
advancement evident from the lack of world-renounced inventions,
scientific breakthroughs, music or cultural products. However I am
now offering the above ideas which I believe will return Turkey and
the surrounding nations to their rightful and influential old glory.

All the relevant and necessary requirements and active factors are
available. All we need are the will of a great statesman and the
courage of the nations to follow and endure the painful but sure and
rewarding path.

–Boundary_(ID_B5Z+wrea1lkykJPHwLaL5A)–

Andre’s Chief Sponsor Is God Himself

ANDRE’S CHIEF SPONSOR IS GOD HIMSELF

A1+
[03:54 pm] 22 September, 2006

Singer Andre who represented Armenia in "Eurovision 2006" announces
that he does not belong to any religious sect. He told a press
conference today that although he was born in an atheist family,
he considers God his chief sponsor.

"During the Karabakh war when I was 8 I sang my first song called
"Prayer" with Christ’s picture in my hands. I sang and prayed God to
protect my father who fought in war and to give us victory", Andre
said. He mentioned that he does not avoid saying that he believes
in God, but that doesn’t mean that he belongs to a sect. "Everyone
believes in some thing. Some believe in the coffee cup, others in
stars. I believe in God".

By the way, Andre was surprised to find out that his September
26concert in Vazgen Sargsyan stadium has a number of sponsors –
major and famous firms. According to him, no one has ever sponsored
his concerts.

The majority of the tickets of the concert has already been sold
(11 thousand from 14). Andre promised the football fans that the
stadium will not be spoilt.

There will also be guests in the concert: singer Varvara from Russia,
Elena Lisnetski who represented Macedonia in "Eurovision 2006" and
others. During the concert Andre will represent his new CD which is
called "A Thousand Times". After the Yerevan concert Andre will leave
for the United States and a number of European countries in order to
give concerts. He will return to Yerevan on December 12.

He also mentioned that the video of his song "Without you love" is
still broadcast by a number of European TC Channels. Besides, he was
invited to the celebration of the Independence Day of Ukraine as an
honored guest.

Let us add that on September 2 in connection with the 15th anniversary
of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic the National Assembly of NKR awarded
Andre a medal as a singer devoted to his homeland. Andre who is from
Artsakh by birth accepted the medal proudly.

ANKARA – Eurlings: "Statements on genocide allegations should be str

Turkish Press, MI

Press review
Published: 9/21/2006

EURLINGS: "STATEMENTS ON GENOCIDE ALLEGATIONS SHOULD
BE STRICKEN FROM THE EP REPORT"

Dutch MEP Camiel Eurlings, the European Parliament Committee on
Foreign Affairs rapporteur who recently prepared a report on Turkey,
yesterday said, "Recognizing the [so-called] Armenian genocide
can’t be a precondition. These statements should be stricken from
the text." Speaking about next week’s vote on the report, Eurlings
said that he didn’t like the current state of the report and he was
working to change it. "If the report is issued as is, it will be
a problem for Turkey’s accession," said Eurlings. In related news,
Eurlings’ report, which contains exaggerations, is now encountering
opposition from EP groups. Recognizing the so-called Armenian
genocide as a precondition for membership is at the focal point of
the debates. Socialists and Greens are planning to vote against the
report if it’s not changed. /Milliyet/

Forum of NK & Iranian businessmen in Stepanakert

FORUM OF KARABAKH AND IRANIAN BUSINESSMEN IN STEPANAKERT

Noyan Tapan News Agency, Armenia
Sept 20 2006

STEPANAKERT, SEPTEMBER 20, NOYAN TAPAN. On the initiative of the
Nagorno Karabakh Republic Ministry of Territorial Management and
Development of Industrial Infrastructures, the Artsakh Development
Agency and Public organization of businessmen and merchants of Iran
in Armenia, a group of businessmen and manufacturers from Iran paid
a two-day visit to Stepanakert.

A number of issues of mutual interest were discussed in the course
of the forum conducted in the building of the NKR Government. In
particular, variants of import of raw materials and corresponding
equipment were discussed. It was decided also to organize an exposition
of Iranian goods in the NKR in future.

The Iranian businessmen visited a number of industrial enterprises of
the republic, got acquainted with the production of local businessmen,
showed interest in the tax field and breaks established for foreign
investors.

On behalf of the NKR Government Anoushavan Daniyelian expressed
readiness to render necessary assistance to the Iranian businessmen
in implementation of their programs in Nagorno Karabakh.

Manifestation a Nevers contre l’expulsion d’une famille armenienne

Manifestation a Nevers contre l’expulsion d’une famille armenienne

Agence France Presse
20 septembre 2006 mercredi 2:36 PM GMT

LYON 20 sept 2006 — Plusieurs centaines de personnes ont manifeste
mercredi a Nevers afin de protester contre l’interpellation d’une
jeune fille armenienne sans papiers de 21 ans, scolarisee dans un
lycee de la ville, et de membres de sa famille, a-t-on appris auprès
de la police et des manifestants.

Les manifestants – 200 selon la police, 300 selon les organisateurs
-, dont de nombreux elèves du lycee Raoul Follereau où la jeune fille
suivait des cours de terminale jusqu’a son interpellation mardi matin,
ont organise un sit-in tout l’après-midi devant la prefecture de
la Nièvre.

Majeure et arrivee en France il y a quatre ans, la jeune fille ne
rentre pas dans le cadre de la circulaire Sarkozy.

"Nous demandons une autorisation derogatoire de sejourner sur le
territoire, le temps qu’elle finisse sa terminale, et que ses parents,
un couple mixte azeri-armenien, s’organisent pour demander l’asile
politique", a indique a l’AFP Catherine Terret, professeur et membre
du collectif nivernais de soutien aux elèves sans papiers.

D’après le Reseau Education sans frontières (RESF), la jeune fille,
ses deux frères majeurs, ses parents ainsi que deux cousins, ont ete
transferes vers differents centres de retention administrative de la
region parisienne.

Mardi, des manifestants s’etaient deja rassembles devant le
commissariat de Nevers.

–Boundary_(ID_B2wNCm7g9u0wQK5hHmvLRA)–

Speaker of Armenian parliament: Oil dollars are not key to resolving

Speaker of Armenian parliament: Oil dollars are not key to resolving Nagorno Karabakh conflict

REGNUM
September 21, 2006

Speaker of Armenian parliament: Oil dollars are not key to resolving
Nagorno Karabakh conflict Read it in Russian

Speaker of Armenian parliament Tigran Torosyan received Sep
20 ambassador of Netherlands to Armenia Onno Frederic Gudenol
Elderenbosch.

The sides discussed issues of inter-government cooperation, REGNUM
reports referring to the parliament press office. Tigran Torosyan
described inter-state relations with Netherlands as important to
Armenia. Armenia, he stated, has announced Euro-integration a priority
of its foreign policy, and experience and capabilities of Netherlands
are of great interest to Armenia.

The Netherlands ambassador said that Armenia is of special interest
for his country, and signing in October a new neighborhood program
with the European Union will open new opportunities for developing
cooperation and realizing joint programs with the EU.

Onno Elderenbosch informed that after the April elections in
Netherlands, he would be able to take effort to organize bilateral
visits and extend inter-parliamentary relations.

Speaking of the regional situation, Tigran Torosyan noted that Armenia
is ready to establish normal relations with all her neighbors,
although, unfortunately, not all the neighbors are ready for such
relations. In particular, Torosyan maintained, Azerbaijan propagates
hatred towards Armenians, which does not help to settle the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict, since it is not oil dollars that are the key to
resolving the issue. It is not coincidental that EU representatives
voice concern about Azerbaijan’s inflating military budget and
belligerent rhetoric of its political leaders. At the same time,
cooperation with other countries, for example, Iran, develops based
on mutual respect.

The sides also touched upon parliamentary elections of 2007,
emphasizing the importance of their conformity to international norms.

Greece Rebuffs Turkish Criticism Over Muslim Minority Treatment

GREECE REBUFFS TURKISH CRITICISM OVER MUSLIM MINORITY TREATMENT

Agence France Presse — English
September 17, 2006 Sunday 9:16 PM GMT

Greece on Sunday rebuffed Turkish claims that Athens is violating the
rights of the Muslim minority living along its northeastern border,
telling Ankara that it should instead concentrate on human rights
reforms at home.

"Turkey…has undertaken the obligation to meet specific conditions
and commitments before the European Union," the Greek foreign ministry
said in a statement.

On Saturday, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Greece
should respect the right of its Muslim minority to elect its own
religious leader, known as a mufti, or risk reciprocal measures
from Ankara.

"If Greece respects its own minority rights and has expectations
from Turkey on this issue, then its should also fulfill its own
obligations," Erdogan told an assembly of Turks from northeastern
Greece, the Anatolia news agency reported.

"This issue must be resolved. If not, there are things Turkey could
do under the principle of reciprocity," he said.

The issue arose after the recent death of Mehmet Emin Aga, a senior
ethnic Turkish Muslim who for years acted as mufti to the Muslim
minority in the face of opposition from the Greek authorities, who
nominated a rival mufti.

Greek courts convicted Emin Aga repeatedly in the past decade
for illegally acting as a mufti, leading to protests from the
international human rights group Amnesty International and Greek
rights organisations.

Erdogan on Saturday charged that Greece’s treatment of its Muslim
minority of about 100,000, which lives in the northeastern Thrace
region bordering Turkey, amounted to a violation of the human rights
criteria of the European Union of which it is a member.

"Our aim is to allow our kinsmen to benefit from their rights under
bilateral and international agreements as respected and equal citizens
of Greece," the prime minister said.

On Sunday, the Greek foreign ministry said Athens treated all its
citizens equally, and accused Ankara of seeking excuses to disguise
the sluggishness noted in its EU-mandated reforms.

Turkey itself is under pressure from the European Union, with which it
began membership talks last year, to improve the rights of minorities,
including its sizeable Kurdish community and non-Muslims.

Predominantly Muslim Turkey is home to small groups of Jews and
Christians, mainly Orthodox Greeks and Armenians, most of them
concentrated in Istanbul.

Istanbul is also home to the The Ecumenical Orthodox Patriarchate,
which represents the 250 million Orthodox worshippers in the world.

Ankara plays no part in the elections of the patriarch, but refuses to
recognise the patriarchate’s ecumenical title and says it represents
only Orthodox Greeks in Turkey.

Harvest was better organized this year

Azat Artsakh, NKR
Sept 13 2006

HARVEST WAS BETTER ORGANIZED THIS YEAR

Vladimir Zakiyan, the deputy minister of agriculture of NKR, says
this year harvesting of grain crops started late was delayed by
rains, but it finished in time. He pointed out that this year the
harvest was better organized and more agricultural machines were
used. On the whole, the deputy minister is satisfied with the course
of harvest, but he is worried by the low yield. The average yield per
hectare was 1140 kg, which is lower by 210 kg compared with 2005. The
lowest yield was in Shushi, where the average yield per hectare was
900 kg, and in Kashatagh, 940 kg. The yield of grain in Martakert was
comparatively good, the average yield per hectare was 1610 kg, in
some parts the average yield totaled 3000 kg per hectare. By official
data, 55,272 hectares was harvested, 62,454 tonnes of grain was
produced. The deputy minister said, unfortunately, the lasting heavy
rains in May damaged almost 50 percent of the yield. In answer to the
question whether it was possible to prevent the losses, V. Zakiyan
said sustainable yield requires deep tillage and several procedures,
which are not always performed by the farmers. Besides, very few
farmers use phosphate fertilizers; it is clear that an ordinary
farmer cannot afford to. Another cause of the poor yield is that
people sow wheat and barley in the same field every year. Crop
rotation is not practiced, however, and one of the problems is the
tax on land. If the government exempted farmers from the tax on land
for a year, it would be very helpful. V. Zakiyan said this year land
under crop will expand. He also informed that he government will
provide seeds and fuel aid to the owners of fields, which were
damaged by weather or fires, which is moral support rather.

M. DAVTIAN.
13-09-2006