The future in seeds of the past

Canberra Times, Australia
September 3, 2007 Monday

THE FUTURE IN SEEDS OF THE PAST

T he farmer’s tanned, furrowed, face is thoughtful. ”You should ask
the old women,” he says after a pause. He smiles, dull veins of gold
in his teeth. From village to village, farm to farm, others agree.
”Ask the old women.” They are helpful and nostalgic, and after an
obligatory vodka or two, melancholic.

We are high in the mountains of southern Armenia on a mission they
understand. They are farmers in the land where farming began.

So we start calling out the old women, who emerge from lightless
kitchens and farm buildings reliable electricity also just a memory
in these remote pockets of the old Soviet empire and we explain our
quest. They hurry away and with extraordinary generosity re-emerge
with tins, jars and knotted cloth containing biological treasures the
seeds of bygone crops.

Grains of wheat, barley, beans and peas disappear into small yellow
envelopes, marked with the name of the village, the name of the
family, and the GPS position the hand held satellite positioning
device an object of wonder to scores of children.

The old women wish us well. Some cry, because these visiting
scientists seem to understand what they have known intuitively all
along: that the traditional varieties were special.

There is a surrealism to these meetings, underscored by the dissonant
chatter of Australian, Russian and Armenian accents as the team
probes for knowledge of yesteryear crops, and asks for a little of
the seed that might be hoarded. As we travel over rutted mountain
roads we are also looking for places where ancestral plants might
still grow on high plains. We are on a hunt for genes; for lost
genetic resources that agricultural scientists say will be crucial
for the world to keep feeding itself despite climate change and
deteriorating agricultural landscapes.

And so this small band of genetic detectives is scouring the
birthplace of agriculture, the Caucuses Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan
and parts of Russia for remnant on-farm storages, and for ancestral
wild grasses from which modern crops like wheat and barley were first
bred some 5000 years ago.

The mission is led by a Syria- based Australian, Dr Ken Street, an
agricultural ecologist with the International Centre for Agricultural
Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA), and comprises Russian and Armenian
plant researchers, as well as another Australian, Perth-based Dr
Clive Francis from the Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean
Agriculture. Their work is partly funded by Australia through the
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research and the
Grains Research and Development Corporation.While a two- or
three-degree increase in average temperatures may be perceived by
people as merely a comfort issue, a fraction of a degree change can
be enough to stop many food plants from flowering and delivering
grains and fruits. So the genes that allow the old relatives of
modern crops to flourish in frozen or arid landscapes need to be
found and reintroduced.

”We are going back through time, backwards through man- made
evolution,” explains Dr Ken Street, who has been leading seed
collecting expeditions into Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and
Tajikistan over the past six years.

”We are looking for the grasses that were used for bread-making
thousands of years ago at the start of civilisation when people first
saw that keeping and sowing seeds from the best plants gradually
improved what they were harvesting. We are searching for what our far
distant ancestors were using; not because they are better but because
they have a wider genetic base. A modern wheat plant might have a few
hundred parents from a breeding program, but the ancient wild
varieties had hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of parents.”
The genetic diversity of the Caucuses, and the lure of discovery, is
also what keeps pulling Clive Francis back, long after he had
intended retiring.

Gazing across a meadow brimming with plant life, he explains that in
Armenia alone there are 125 species of Astragalus, part of the legume
family. Legumes are his passion. ”The legumes we grow in Australia
are annuals, but there are perennial crop plants here that could help
us manage our wheatbelt water table and limit the build-up of
salinity,” he says.

Collected seed is planted and assessed at ICARDA in Syria and the
most promising lines sent to plant breeders in Perth, Adelaide,
Horsham and Tamworth for introducing to local crop improvement
programs. Legumes are increasingly important in Australian
agriculture as rotation crops between wheat and barley plantings, as
they break potential disease cycles, and increase soil nitrogen.
Their deep roots improve soil structure and closely mimic native
plants in the way they help prevent rising water tables that cause
most of the wheatbelt’s salinity.

Aside from benefiting Australian farmers, improved generations will
be sent back to ICARDA to help agricultural development in developing
countries. Legumes’ ability to transfer nitrogen from the atmosphere
to the soil, and research being done to adapt them to sub-tropical
environments, is seen as a low- cost, practical way to restore
impoverished soils in hunger- ravaged areas of Africa.

But in contrast to the almost ready-to-use legumes, harnessing genes
from wheat’s ancestral grasses is a 10 to 15 year proposition, a
process that could be accelerated by using genetic engineering.
Wheat’s ancestors are too far removed to be able to be crossed with
modern plants, given that wheat is essentially a man-made crop.
However, while the use of GM technologies would allow researchers to
retrieve from ancestral grasses the gene sets capable of delivering
traits such as drought and frost tolerance comparatively quickly,
this cannot be contemplated until the moratoriums on growing GM crops
in NSW, Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia expire in
2008.

The frustration for Australian researchers is that their counterparts
in North and South America have no such restrictions and are enjoying
a handy head- start.

In recent years, Street’s seed collecting missions have become part
of an international program developed under the auspices of the
Global Crop Diversity Trust, set up as an instrument of the
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and
Agriculture.

This was established two years ago to try and arrest the erosion of
the world’s plant genetic resources.

”It’s a survival issue,” says Street. ”For most people around the
world that means avoiding starvation, while for farmers in countries
like Australia it is economic survival.” Late-season frosts destroy
millions of dollars worth of cereal crops in Australia because the
European origins of Australian varieties do not have the ideal
genetic lineage for the Australian environment. ”There are wheat
varieties in central Asia and the Caucuses that comfortably tolerate
frost and low rainfall,” Street says. The work by Street and Francis
also involves trying to save, or rebuild, the once pre-eminent plant
collections housed in the neglected botanical institutes of the
former Soviet republics in central Asia and the Caucuses.

”The world is losing irreplaceable seed from these collections
simply because the local people can’t afford to replace water pumps,
or stored seed is being eaten by mice,” says Street.

”This is frightening, because the genetic origins for a very large
proportion of the world’s food crops, including the crops we grow in
Australia, do not exist anywhere else.” He says it’s all about
making sure that despite the environmental pressures facing global
agriculture, the world’s farmers can still keep bread on the table
figuratively and literally.

Dr Ken Street is profiled in FutureCrop, published by the GRDC.
events/grdcpublications/ futurecropsect2

www.grdc.com.au/director/

Even Four Or Five Rounds Would Not Be Enough For Serge Sargsyan To B

EVEN FOUR OR FIVE ROUNDS WOULD NOT BE ENOUGH FOR SERGE SARGSYAN TO BECOME PRESIDENT IN A FAIR ELECTION
Hakob Badalyan

Lragir, Armenia
Aug 30 2007

It seems to be beyond doubt that everything the opposition is doing now
is almost a guarantee of the victory of Prime Minister Serge Sargsyan
in the presidential election of 2008. The opposition imparted their
meetings with such mystery that now they have to support this mystery
with adequate contents, meanwhile it is clear that it is impossible
because 90 percent of the politicians attending these meetings will
perhaps stay till they make sure they are not the common candidate of
the opposition. Afterwards each will make a statement, expect that the
consultations of the opposition did not give what had been expected
and will justify their nomination. Or in order to avoid appearing
ambitious or unfaithful, these candidates will explain their nomination
by tactical moves, saying that it is the best way of emergence of the
common candidate. Everyone imagines this mechanism: several opposition
candidates are nominated, they launch an election campaign, then the
plan requires a second round, and logically Serge Sargsyan and one
of the oppositionists run in the second round, and the opposition
running in the second round deserves becoming the common candidate.

Two counterarguments, however, show that this tactics is illogical.

First, nobody can guarantee that several oppositionists will not
consider the oppositionist running in the second round as a protege of
the government whom Serge Sargsyan helped to get to the second round,
ensuring his smooth victory. After all, there have been a few similar
cases in the glorious history of the Armenian opposition. Why should
any of the opposition leaders who will be running in the election
out of their ambitions justifying it by the intention to reveal the
natural common candidate in the second round accept the presence of
this candidate in the second round? If anyone is likely to give up
ambitions, they will do it in the first round.

Now the second counterargument. Who said or who did Serge Sargsyan
tell that he is likely to be elected president in the run-off
election? First, it is obvious that Serge Sargsyan took the track
for outdoing Robert Kocharyan’s political deeds, like Hitler tried
to beat Napoleon’s military records because the prime minister has
raised the lath of economic indices, meanwhile Robert Kocharyan has
mainly relied on these indices in the years of his office. And since
the prime minister seeks to outdo the president, and Robert Kocharyan
seems unlikely to stop him, it is highly probable that Serge Sargsyan
will try to become president in the first round and more confidently
than Robert Kocharyan became president in 2003 in a run-off election.

Serge Sargsyan’s desire is logical, in fact. It is clear that perhaps
even four or five rounds would not be enough for Serge Sargsyan to
become president in a fair election. In other words, it will be
necessary to use both administrative and financial intervention,
like the absolute victory was ensured on May 12, although in a way
that allowed the international community to recognize the results. If
Serge Sargsyan can have this mechanism work, he will do it in a single
round and will not prolong the tense climate. And if he fails in the
first round, he will lose the second round in two weeks.

Consequently, there is no alternative to solving the problem at once,
and Serge Sargsyan’s efforts to get all the levers of government
before becoming president show he has already made the political
decision to win in the first round, even though Galust Sahakyan has
not stated officially.

What will the opposition be doing then? How about the common candidate
operation which stops halfway? In fact, nothing prevents the opposition
from resuming it, since the next election is in 2013, and most probably
the opponent of the opposition will again be Serge Sargsyan.

Helsinki Association Demands Setting Alexander Arzumanyan Free

HELSINKI ASSOCIATION DEMANDS SETTING ALEXANDER ARZUMANYAN FREE

Panorama.am
16:26 30/08/2007

"Carefully watching the process of the criminal case against Alexander
Arzumanyan we once again came to the assurance that the Armenian law
enforcement bodies continue to act in the field of illegality as they
did in the past," Helsinki Association made this statement today. The
statement says: "Keeping to the logic pursued for years in their style
of work the Armenian law enforcement bodies first found the "guilty"
and then made up the "guilt."

The statement also says the aim is to keep ex-foreign minister and
the initiator of Civil Disobedience Movement Alexander Arzumanyan
away "as long as possible" in order to avoid problems before the
presidential elections.

Helsinki Association demands to "swiftly set ex-foreign minister
Alexander Arzumanyan free" and to charge "criminal officials of
the National Security Service" for making groundless accusations
against Arzumanyan. The authors of the statement also demand civil
investigation in the National Security Service and the Prosecutor’s
Office of Armenia saying the latter was not "consistent in preventing
the illegalities taking place within the case."

ANKARA: Turkey Expects Israel’s Support In Regard Of US Jews

TURKEY EXPECTS ISRAEL’S SUPPORT IN REGARD OF US JEWS

Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
904
Aug 30 2007

Turkey expects Israel to "deliver" American Jewish organizations and
ensure that the US Congress does not pass a resolution characterizing
as genocide the massacre of Armenians during World War I, Turkish
Ambassador to Israel Namik Tan told The Jerusalem Post Sunday.

Tan cut short a vacation and rushed back to Israel Thursday to
deal with the Anti-Defamation League’s reversal last week of its
long-standing position on the issue.

Tan said he understood that Israel’s position had not changed, but
"Israel should not let the [US] Jewish community change its position.

This is our expectation and this is highly important, highly
important."

Turkey’s concern is that last week’s decision by ADL national director
Abe Foxman would open the dikes and enable the passage in Congress
of a nonbinding resolution calling Ottoman Turkey’s actions against
the Armenians "genocide."

"If you want to touch and hurt the hearts of the people in Turkey,
this is the issue," Tan said. "This is the No. 1 issue. You cannot
easily explain to them any change in this."

He said he had requested urgent meetings with Prime Minister Ehud
Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Knesset Speaker Dalia Itzik,
to impress upon them the importance of this issue to Turkey.

Tan’s request for these meetings came after President Shimon Peres
spoke last week with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
and explained that Israel had no intention of changing its policy
on this issue, which is that Turkey and Armenia should resolve their
differences over the matter through dialogue.

In the eyes of the Turkish people, Tan said, his country’s strategic
relationship with Israel was not with Israel alone, but with the
whole Jewish world. "They [the Turkish people] cannot make that
differentiation," he said.

Tan said he understood that the American Jewish organizations were
just that – American Jewish organizations. But "we all know how they
work in coordinating their efforts [with Israel]," he added.

Tan opted for an anecdote to illustrate his point, saying former
US secretary of state Henry Kissinger once said he was first an
American, then the secretary of state, and then a Jew. Golda Meir
"told Kissinger: ‘You know, Mr. Secretary, we read things from right
to left.’ This tells a lot about my case," Tan said.

The Turkish people "are waiting for this effort on the part of Israel
to straighten out, to put this issue in perspective," he said.

While senior Israeli government officials said Sunday that Israel
was trying to explain to Turkey that it did not control the American
Jewish organizations, Tan did not accept that argument.

"On some issues there is no such thing as ‘Israel cannot deliver~B’"
he said, adding that this was one of those issues.

Tan, who served two terms in Washington in the 1990s and worked closely
with American Jewish organizations on this issue, said Israel had
proven its ability to deliver the organizations on this matter in
the past.

While voicing no threats as to what would happen if Congress passed a
resolution on this matter, Tan said Turkey – since the development of
a close strategic relationship with Israel in the 1990s – had never
"played with the basics of this whole relationship, with the basic
fundamentals of this relationship." A reversal by the American Jewish
community of its position on this matter, leading to the passage of
the resolution in Congress, would be tantamount to playing with one
of the fundamentals of this strategic relationship, he said.

Meanwhile, visiting Rep. Gary Ackerman (D.-New York) told the Post that
were the resolution to come to the Congress today, "it would pass,
I guess. There is lots of heavy lobbying on both sides. Some things
are better left in the fuzzy area. Some think that not addressing
this for the moment is the better deal, considering the consequences."

Nevertheless, Ackerman, a staunch supporter of Israel, said he had
"been signed up on the bill for a long time."

"Those of us who have condemned genocide and ethnic cleansing and
insisted on people accepting responsibility and learning from the
lessons of the Holocaust… well, the Armenian Genocide is something
we’ve said must be owned up to," he said.

The "complication is in the justice and timing," Ackerman said.

"Turkey is a very important player, juxtaposed in many complicated
issues now. Their government’s cooperation is essential in a number
of areas."

He said he had been lobbied by Turkish Jews on the matter, who
had asked that the issue be resolved "in a different arena," not
in Congress.

On the wider issue of the weight of Congressional resolutions,
Ackerman said: "We’re constantly shocked by the weight [attached to]
the resolution. We don’t take them [such resolutions] one-tenth as
seriously as other people do. They don’t have the force of law. If
the Turkish parliament passed a resolution saying, ‘Shame on you
for stealing Manhattan’… we’d laugh it off. But then, of course,
it doesn’t rock our political boat."

Tan said that while he understood Congressional resolutions on
this would have no real "teeth," the psychological importance
was enormous. Accepting the resolution, he said, "means you deny
the past, it means you say that my ancestors have done something
inconceivable. And the people who will be encouraged by this will
use it to set up a campaign against Turkey and the Turkish people."

http://www.turkishweekly.net/news.php?id=47

Hope For Islamists To Improve Situation Of Minorities

HOPE FOR ISLAMISTS TO IMPROVE SITUATION OF MINORITIES

Panorama.am
22:05 28/08/2007

"The possible election of Abdullah Gul, of the "Justice and Progress"
party, shows the importance predominance of the party in the country,
and the Armenian community, especially those following the lead of the
patriarch, by casting their votes for Gul hope that his party will
work to improve the condition of religious and ethnic minorities in
Turkey," said Ruben Safrastyan, director of the Institute of Eastern
Studies in reference to Turkey’s recent parliamentary elections.

In his opinion, the pro-Islamist party’s ascension is a result of
the country’s attempts at European Union membership. The expert on
Turkish studies thinks there are many in the Justice and Progress
party who doubt that Kemal Ataturk, founder of modern Turkey, should
be the country’s model, and are ready to change all that concerning
both internal issues and external political relations.

"For example, in October of 2002 several members of the party
announced that relations with Armenia should be based only on economic
considerations," Safrastyan said, expressing hope that with the party’s
election postive changes would take place in regard to relations with
its neighbors.

In any event, the expert doesn’t see any change by official Anakra
in regard to recognizing the Genocide as a historical reality.

BBC Monitoring Quotes From Israel’s Hebrew Press 27 Aug 07

BBC Monitoring Quotes from Israel’s Hebrew Press 27 Aug 07

BBC
Aug 27 2007

The following is a selection of quotes from editorials published in 27
Aug editions of Hebrew-language Israeli newspapers available to BBCM.

Relations with Palestinians

"Preparations for the regional conference are seemingly progressing
well.

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and PA Chairman Mahmud Abbas (Abu Mazin)
are close to agreeing a joint document of principles. But the affairs
on the ground remain weary. In view of the existing reality in the West
Bank and the Gaza Strip all the talk about documents, conferences and
principles is worth a little. One has to see the headlines in the Arab
media in general and the Palestinian media in particular, that report
daily about people being killed and injured, about clashes depicted as
massacres or murder in cold blood and add to this the reports of the
women of Mahsom [Checkpoint] Watch about mistreatments and humiliations
[of Palestinians] in order to understand that the distance between talk
and deeds is immense…As long as Israel raises higher the walls of
separation and the Palestinian become poorer all the quibbling about
the settlement principles are not worth much." [From commentary by
Danny Rubinstein in left-of-centre, independent broadsheet Ha’aretz]

"Even without the prophecy cloak people in the Western Negev know what
the future holds for us. One not far off day one of the rockets fired
from Bayt Hanun will deviate from the miracle course that guided them
thus far and hit a classroom or crowded bus stop. Then the security
cabinet would meet urgently, the chief of staff would draw the plan
prepared for the outburst of anger and the revenge demand and the IDF
[Israel Armed Forces] would cross the fence and enter Bayt Hanun… For
every dead Israeli there will ten Palestinians… Following the
withdrawal of our forces temporary calm will prevail that slowly
will melt away and again rockets will fly from Bayt Hanun and again
an IDF reaction and so on and so forth… Perhaps nevertheless it
is worth reminding that the circular, folly march of killers and
killed is not an act of fate. Perhaps we should talk before so much
perishes?" [From commentary by Ze’ev Tsahor in centrist, largest
circulation Yediot Aharonot]

"Blind in Gaza is the name of an old novel by the British philosopher
Aldus Huxley… But today there are no blind in Gaza… They are
in Israel…

Instead of preserving what exists they [Israel’s leaders] want to
concede more territory… Israel’s leadership urgently needs strong
shaking, an earthquake that would throw out those who toady to Ariel
Sharon who started an accelerated campaign to destroy Zionism… Israel
needs a leader who will tell the Americans and the Europeans that we
have no intention of establishing a terrorist state on the borders
of Israel. An enemy state in our land is not a solution…" [From
commentary by Aharon Papo in centre-right Makor Rishon]

Outposts

"Once again, talks are reportedly being held on how many outposts
the settlers will evacuate voluntarily, in exchange for the state
‘laundering’ other outposts. Judging by the previous round, the
outposts slated for laundering will indeed be legalized, the settlers
will vacate a few rusty shacks, and most of the outposts will remain
in place…What significance could there possibly be to negotiations
with the Palestinians on an agreement of principles for ending the
occupation if the government is at once holding negotiations with
the settlers on legalizing outposts in the very heart of the West
Bank…?" [From Ha’aretz editorial of left-of-centre, independent
broadsheet Ha’aretz]

UNIFIL

"For better or worse, barring another explosion of conflict, UNIFIL
will continue to feature on our northern frontier for at least the next
year. Its mandate has just been unanimously extended by the UN Security
Council… The hope in most UN quarters, and certainly among the
nations contributing troops to UNIFIL, is that the present situation
in Lebanon can be kept as is. So long as it doesn’t appreciably
deteriorate, UNIFIL’s sponsors will be gratified. But the calm in
Lebanon is deceptive. Beneath the surface, Hizbullah has rearmed,
acquiring weaponry more sophisticated than that with which it caused
such heavy damage to Israel last summer. UNIFIL has not prevented
this… The bottom line is that UNIFIL can only keep the peace as long
as such deceptive tranquility serves Hizbullah’s interests. The UN
presence in southern Lebanon, unfortunately, is merely marking time to
the next showdown." [From editorial of English-language Jerusalem Post]

Armenian genocide

"One day in March this year MK Haim Oron took the floor and proposed
from the podium of the Knesset of the Jewish state that MKs approve
a debate in the plenum on the genocide of the Armenian people 92
years ago… MK Reuven Rivlin joined him and drew a line between the
Holocaust and the genocide of the Armenians… But there was another
MK, Avigdor Yitzhaki, then coalition chairman: While the two were
speaking Yitzhaki began a campaign of whispers and urged MKs to
drop the issue from the agenda at the instruction of the foreign
minister who phoned Oron in a panic from New York urging him not
to raise the issue… Yitzhaki won… Until now Jerusalem, under
Turkish pressure, has managed to silence the moral vote. But doing
so it joined the denial of the first genocide in the last century by
implication. Israel and Jewish organizations deny genocide? Is this
so? Yes, this is exactly what happened." [From commentary by Ya’akov
Ahimeir in centre-right Ma’ariv]

William Saroyan International Prize For 2008 Linked With Writer’s Ce

WILLIAM SAROYAN INTERNATIONAL PRIZE FOR 2008 LINKED WITH WRITER’S CENTENNIAL

Stanford Report
22/saroyan-082207.html
Aug 22 2007

The third William Saroyan International Prize for Writing (also known
as the Saroyan Prize) will coincide with the California writer’s
centennial celebrations in 2008. The $12,500 biennial prize, awarded
for fiction and non-fiction, is sponsored by Stanford University
Libraries in partnership with the William Saroyan Foundation.

Entries must be received on or before January 31, 2008. The English
language works must be available for purchase in book form by
the general public and published during the 2005-2007 period. The
judges will consider literary fiction (including novels, short story
collections and drama) and literary non-fiction (biography, history
and memoirs) of any length. They will be looking for strong literary
merit that honors the Saroyan legacy, with particular interest in
non-fiction in the Saroyan tradition-memoirs, portraits and excursions
into neighborhood and community. Winners will be publicly recognized
at the centennial celebrations on Sept. 5, 2008. Official entry forms
and rules are available at

The first William Saroyan International Prize for Writing was awarded
in 2003 to Jonathan Safran Foer for his novel Everything is Illuminated
(Houghton Mifflin, 2002). The second Saroyan Prize, awarded in 2005,
was the first to be offered for both fiction and non-fiction. George
Hagen received the fiction prize for his novel The Laments (Random
House, 2004); the non-fiction prize went to Mark Arax and Rick Wartzman
for The King of California (Public Affairs, 2005).

The William Saroyan Foundation, officially founded by Saroyan in 1966,
decided in 1990 to bring together the entire literary estate into a
single archive. The trustees eventually offered Stanford University
the assembled Saroyan literary collection.

"The Saroyan Prize is an integral part of the library’s ongoing and
active involvement with the Saroyan archive, but it also provides a
wonderful opportunity for Stanford students and alumni, as well as
literati everywhere, to interact actively with the emerging literary
figures of our time," said Michael A. Keller, Stanford University
Librarian. "We are particularly pleased to be offering the prize
during this centennial celebration of Saroyan’s birth, when so much
attention is being given to Saroyan’s life and work."

"The Saroyan Foundation is pleased to be involved in fulfilling
Saroyan’s dream of establishing a writing prize to encourage and
perpetuate the art he so loved," said Haig Mardikian, president of
the William Saroyan Foundation. "Saroyan not only had a great passion
for writing, he also was an accomplished visual abstract artist; so
it is particularly fitting that this award is being granted during
the Saroyan centennial celebrations where we are commemorating many
of Saroyan’s artistic achievements."

The Fresno-born Saroyan, an American writer and playwright, was
a Pulitzer Prize and Academy Award winner best known for his short
stories about humorous experiences of immigrant families and children
in California. Much of Saroyan’s work is clearly autobiographical,
although similar in style and technique to fiction. Saroyan was the
fourth child of Armenian immigrants. He battled his way through poverty
and rose to literary prominence in the early 1930s when national
magazines began publishing his short stories, including "The Daring
Young Man on the Flying Trapeze," "My Name Is Aram," "Inhale & Exhale,"
"Three Times Three" and "Peace, It’s Wonderful." Saroyan wrote plays
for Broadway and screenplays for Hollywood, including My Heart’s in
the Highlands, The Time of Your Life, The Beautiful People and The
Human Comedy.

http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2007/august
http://saroyanprize.stanford.edu/.

Another Shipment To Gyumri

ANOTHER SHIPMENT TO GYUMRI

Panorama.am
20:07 23/08/2007

Today another shipment of Russian military equipment left Batumi by
railway for their base in Gyumri, as was revealed by Itar Tass. Today
18 train cars will reach the Armenian-Georgian border. This is already
the fourth time this year that Russian weaponry has been shipped
from Batumi to Armenia. The Russian military foresees yet another
shipment this year, with another to Russia by way of Azerbaijan. We
point out that 11 shipments of weaponry, shipped from Batumi, have
taken place this year. We remind that the closure of the Akhalkalak
base, as agreed on by Russia and Georgia, has already been completed,
and that the Batumi base closure will be done by October 1, 2008.

Armenia Is Threatened By A Danger Of Isolation As Georgia And Azerba

ARMENIA IS THREATENED BY A DANGER OF ISOLATION AS GEORGIA AND AZERBAIJAN HAVE CLOSER RELATIONS WITH EUROPE, AMERICAN ANALYST THINKS

arminfo
2007-08-22 08:53:00

Armenia is threatened by a danger of isolation as Georgia and
Azerbaijan have closer relations with Europe, American analyst Richard
Kirakosyan said at the press-conference in Urbat club, Tuesday.

He also added that the problem of the North Iraq is the main
reason of Turkey’s striving not towards the West but the East. ‘The
presidential election in Russia and the USA in 2008 will greatly
affect Armenia’, – he said. Touching on the Armenian-Iranian relations,
Kirakosyan said that they are more stable than the Azernaijani-Iranian
ones. ‘Armenia and Iran are on the stable level of cooperation, but
the Azerbaijani-Iranian relations are more problematic’, – the analyst
emphasized. He called symbolic the fact that simultaneously Iranian
president left for Azerbaijan and vice-president for Armenia. ‘But
there is difference: Iranian president went to Azerbaijan to discuss
political and energy problems, but Iranian vice-president visited
Armenia because of opening of the Pan-Armenian games and to discuss
cooperation in the sphere of sports’, – he said.