Armenian President Receives Condolences On Armenian Premier’s Death

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT RECEIVES CONDOLENCES ON ARMENIAN PREMIER’S DEATH

Arka News Agency, Armenia
March 28 2007

YEREVAN, March 27. /ARKA/. RA President Robert Kocharyan continues
receiving telegrams of condolences on the death of RA Premier Andranik
Margaryan.

The press service of the RA Foreign Office reports that condolences
were received from Chairman of the European Commission Jose Manuel
Barozzo, Premier of Sweden Frederic Reinfeldt, Premier of Finland
Matti Vanhanen, Greek President Karolos Papoulias, and Greek Premier
Kostas Karamanlis.

The RA President has also received condolences from the state
representative of the Armenian community in Cyprus at the Chamber
of Representatives Vardges Makhtesyan, Head of the Palestinian
administration Mahmud Abbas and OSCE Secretary General Nikolay
Bordyuzha.

Condolences have also been received from Prime Ministers of Belarus
and Lithuania Sergey Sidorsky and Zhedeminas Kerkilas, Turkish Premier
Recep Erdogan and Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, Secertary
General of the EU Council Javier Solana, Greek Deputy Foreign Minister
Teodor Kassimis, representatives of the Armenian community in Spain
and foreign diplomats in Armenia.

The RA President issued a decree declaring March 28 a day of mourning
in Armenia.

Armenian opposition slams Russian gas price rise

Armenian opposition slams Russian gas price rise
Mediamax news agency
22 Mar 06
Yerevan, 22 March: The current state of Armenian-Russian relations was
discussed at the National Press Club today.
MP Shavarsh Kocharyan from the opposition Justice bloc said that
“Armenia and Russia have lost mutual understanding”, Mediamax
reports. He said that the problem caused by Russia’s decision to raise
gas prices is not an economic issue but results from Moscow’s desire
to continue its dominance over post-Soviet countries. “In the
meantime, Armenia’s future lies in integration into European
organizations,” Kocharyan said.
“Armenian-Russian relations have been forming on the basis of legends
for a long time. It is necessary to end emotional relations and pursue
a pragmatic policy with regard to Russia,” the MP said.
The leader of the Armenian Progressive Party, Ovanes Ovanesyan,
believes that “the myth about Armenian-Russian fraternal relations has
collapsed”. “As long as Armenia and Russia do not establish healthy
economic and political relations, we shall permanently come across
what we have now,” he said.
The leader of the Democratic Party of Armenia, Aram Sarkisyan, said
that the Armenian authorities are to blame for this as they “have not
developed a doctrine for cooperation with Russia in due time”. “The
Armenian leadership has made itself dependent indefinitely by handing
over 80 per cent of Armenia’s energy system to Russia,” Sarkisyan
added.

Crematory Refusable For Armenian Apostolic Church – Priest

CREMATORY IS REFUSABLE FOR ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH, PRIEST TER HAKOB
KHACHATRIAN STATES

YEREVAN, MARCH 9, NOYAN TAPAN. Crematory is refusable for the Armenian
Apostolic Church, this is inadmissible from the viewpoint of national
traditional thinking and moral and psychology. Priest Ter Hakob
Khachatrian, spiritual serviceman of the Surb Sargis Church stated
about this at the March 7 discussion organized in the “Hayeli”
club. According to him, crematory is impossible for an Armenian’s
thinking and Armenia usually don’t make use of this service in those
countries where it’s a normal event. According to the priest, it’s a
law defined by the God: “you’re land and will become land.”
To recap, the article concerning the crematory is fixed in the
Febraury 27 law “On Organizing Burials and Usage of Graveyards and
Crematoria” adopted by the RA National Assembly.
NA Deputy Vladimir Badalian, the author of the law, mentioned that the
city of Yerevan is surrounded by graveyards which occupy the 7-8% of
the territory of the capital. And, according to rough calculations,
those territories will make the 30-40% in 2050 in the case of keeping
the present order of burials.
Reasoning the necessity of using crematory, V.Badalian mentioned that
crematory is justified in sanitary-epidemic, ecological and other
senses. Besides, according to the law, crematory may be implemented
only “with the written expression of the will of the man died or those
undretaken the burial.” The Deputy also mentioned that crematories
will start to operate in Armenia from 2008.
Responding the law author’s reasonings, priest Ter Hakob Khachatrian
expressed confidence that the lands may be kept by implementing burial
on another grave what is allowed by the same law. Besides, according
to him, it may be prohibited to build capital constructions on
graves. “In this case, on the one hand, our lands will be kept and on
the other hand, our national and Christian picture won’t be
distorted,” priest Ter Hakob Khachatrian mentioned.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Azeri MP To Take Part In Committee On Political Liaisons Of PA

AZERI MP TO TAKE PART IN COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL LIAISONS OF PACE
Author: H.Azizov
TREND Information, Azerbaijan
March 13 2006
Samed Seyidov, the head of Azerbaijani parliamentary delegation to
the Parliamentary Assembly of the European Council (PACE) has left
for Paris, the Azerbaijani parliament told Trend. The key objective
of the visit is to participate in the work of the PACE committee on
political liaisons in Paris on March 14.
A peaceful resolution of Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict in
Nagorno-Karabakh would be on focus along with other questions. It is
the 10th items of the preliminary agenda of the Committee. Head of
the PACE Ad Hoc Committee on Nagorno-Karabakh Lord Russell-Johnson
will also make a statement during the conference. A meeting of the
committee will be over at 17.00 [Baku time].
Additionally, next meeting of the committee on political liaisons
will take place during the spring session of PACE in Strasbourg on
April 10-13.

Russia Pledges To Resolve Problems Of Idle Enterprises In Armenia

RUSSIA PLEDGES TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS OF IDLE ENTERPRISES IN ARMENIA
Mediamax News Agency, Armenia
Oct 13 2005
Yerevan, 13 October: Igor Levitin, Russian transport minister and
co-chairman of the Russian- Armenian intergovernmental commission,
admitted in Yerevan today that Russia has not fully met conditions
of the property-for-debt deal.
Speaking at a news conference on the outcome of the sitting of the
commission in Yerevan today, Levitin said that the main problem was
that Russia did not identify the types of goods to be manufactured
by the enterprises handed over to Russia within the framework of the
repayment of Armenia’s state debts.
The Russian minister said that a joint working group had been set
up for the full resolution of the issue of the enterprises and it
will submit its proposals to the chairmen of the intergovernmental
commission in early 2006. “Russia understands its responsibility for
the fate of these enterprises,” Levitin said.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian heirs settle $17 million AXA insurance class action

Diane Rumbaugh
Rumbaugh Public Relations
2166 Flintridge Court
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
805-493-2877
[email protected]
CONTACTS:
Brian S. Kabateck Diane Zakian Rumbaugh
Kabateck Brown Kellner LLP
Rumbaugh Public Relations
213-217-5000
805-493-2877
[email protected]
[email protected]
PRESS RELEASE
October 12, 2005

ARMENIAN HEIRS SETTLE
AXA CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
Los Angeles, CA – Descendants of victims of the 1915
Armenian Genocide will share a $17 million settlement in a class action
lawsuit brought against French insurance giant AXA for unpaid life
insurance benefits. (Kyurkjian, et. al. v. AXA, Case No: CV 02-01750 and
Ouzounian, et. al., v. AXA, Case No: CV 05-02596, U.S. District Court,
Central District of California).
The class includes Armenians living in the United States and
abroad who are descendants and heirs of policyholders who perished in
what is considered the first genocide of the 20th century. The
settlement, subject to court approval, will be administered in France,
which was one of the first countries to recognize the Armenian Genocide.
AXA is headquartered in France and does business in the United States
through various subsidiaries.
Under the terms of the $17 million settlement, AXA will
donate a minimum of $3 million dollars to various France-based Armenian
charitable organizations and will contribute $11 million towards a fund
designed to pay, under procedures to be determined later, valid claims
of heirs of policyholders and beneficiaries of policies issued by AXA
Group subsidiaries that did business in the Turkish Ottoman Empire prior
to 1915. Certain of these policyholders and beneficiaries were among
the 1.5 million Armenians who perished and were unable to obtain their
insurance proceeds in the ensuing chaos.
The suit is the second of its kind. Class Counsel Vartkes
Yeghiayan, Brian S. Kabateck and Mark J. Geragos–all of Armenian
descent–are internationally representing Armenian descendants in
similar cases. Earlier this year in another class action (Martin
Marootian, et al. v. New York Life Insurance Company), New York Life
agreed to pay $20 million to descendants of Armenian policyholders
killed during the genocide. Attorneys representing the class against AXA
also represented class members in the New York Life case.
Class Counsel praised the efforts of U.S. District Court
Judges Christina Snyder and Dickran Tevrizian for their assistance in
fostering the dialogue that ultimately led to the settlement and also
praised AXA for dealing in a transparent and responsible manner in
bringing this matter to a successful conclusion.
“This is an example where dead men can’t speak but they can
file lawsuits,” says Yeghiayan of Yeghiayan & Associates. “It writes
another chapter about persistence and hope. The resolution of the case
helps the healing process.”
“The AXA and New York Life settlements are important
building blocks not only toward seeking financial recovery for the
losses resulting from the Armenian Genocide but also in our ultimate
goal, which is for Turkey and the U.S. to officially acknowledge the
genocide,” says Geragos of Geragos & Geragos. “These cases are
historical because they are the only cases ever brought on behalf of
genocide survivors.”
“My grandparents lost their entire families in the genocide.
Our continued legal efforts to bring attention to the terrible events of
90 years ago honor their memories,” says Kabateck of Kabateck Brown
Kellner. “Today, AXA made the right decision by agreeing to establish a
claims fund for the heirs of those killed in the Armenian Genocide.”
An announcement will be made shortly on when and how
individuals can file claims under this settlement.
###
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

L’Arret Des Appels A La Haine,Condition Prealable D’Une Paix Dans Le

L’ARRET DES APPELS A LA HAINE, CONDITION PREALABLE D’UNE PAIX DANS LE HAUT-KARABAKH
Le Temps, France
5 octobre 2005
Malgre l’intransigeance de part et d’autre concernant le conflit du
Haut-Karabakh, une ebauche de dialogue entre l’Armenie et l’Azerbaïdjan
pourrait conduire a un accord sous contrôle international.
Le conflit qui oppose Armeniens et Azerbaïdjanais sur le contrôle du
Haut-Karabakh s’accommode mal de l’etiquette de “conflit gele”.
Depuis le cessez-le-feu de 1994, des escarmouches font chaque mois
des victimes sur la ligne de front separant d’un côte les forces du
Haut-Karabakh et de l’autre celles de l’armee d’Azerbaïdjan.
Le conflit du Karabakh debute en 1991 par la proclamation de
l’independance de ce territoire autonome peuple en majorite
d’Armeniens, mais qui appartenait a l’Azerbaïdjan. Ce dernier
reagit en y envoyant des troupes. Après trois ans de guerre, les
Karabakhis, fortement soutenus par l’Armenie, sont vainqueurs. L’armee
azerbaïdjanaise est non seulement repoussee hors du Haut-Karabakh,
mais sept districts d’Azerbaïdjan sont occupes par les Armeniens et
complètement vides de leurs habitants azeris. Plus de 500 000 Azeris
se retrouvent deplaces de l’autre côte de la ligne de front dans des
camps de fortune. L’Armenie avait dû, quant a elle, accueillir près
de 300 000 Armeniens chasses d’Azerbaïdjan, pour certains d’entre eux
avant meme que le conflit n’eclate, lors des pogromes anti-armeniens
de Sumgaït en 1989. Le nombre de morts depasse les 20 000.
Lorsque le cessez-le-feu est signe en 1994, l’Organisation pour la
securite et la cooperation en Europe (OSCE) croit qu’un arrangement
pourra etre trouve rapidement. Mais onze ans plus tard, rien n’a
bouge: les lignes de front sont toujours la, les parties au conflit
tentent regulièrement de changer leur trace en modifiant certaines de
leurs positions, ce qui se traduit en morts inutiles dans les deux
camps. Sur le plan diplomatique, Bakou tente d’isoler Yerevan de
tous les grands projets regionaux: l’oleoduc Bakou-Tbilisi-Ceyhan,
par exemple, contourne soigneusement l’Armenie. Les Armeniens sont
assis sur leur victoire et refusent d’envisager la restitution d’aucun
des territoires occupes sans une reconnaissance par les Azeris de
l’independance du Haut-Karabakh ou de son rattachement a l’Armenie.
Des deux côtes, des medias maximalistes poussent a la haine raciale en
presentant toujours l’Azeri ou l’Armenien comme l’ennemi ancestral. Les
interpretations de l’Histoire sont diametralement opposees et les
opinions, sûres de la justesse de leur cause, ne sont pas pretes a
accepter la moindre concession.
Or, des concessions, il en faudra si l’on veut eviter une nouvelle
guerre dans le Caucase. Une partie importante des revenus petroliers
d’Azerbaïdjan sert desormais a renflouer une armee dont la mission
declaree est de liberer les territoires occupes et de reprendre le
Karabakh. Le president azerbaïdjanais vient d’annoncer une augmentation
de 70% du budget de la defense, qui avait pourtant deja ete plus que
double entre 2003 et 2005: les depenses de defense en Azerbaïdjan
atteindront bientôt le budget total de l’Etat armenien…
Pourtant, depuis près d’un an, l’espoir d’un règlement pacifique
se profile: les ministres des Affaires etrangères d’Armenie et
d’Azerbaïdjan multiplient les prises de contact dans le cadre du
processus de Prague. Les deux ministres semblent trouver dans ce
format soutenu par les trois copresidents du groupe de Minsk de l’OSCE
(Russie, France et Etats-Unis) un espace où leurs positions peuvent
avancer. En marge du sommet des pays de la Communaute des Etats
independants a Kazan le 27 août dernier, les presidents Kocharian
d’Armenie et Aliyev d’Azerbaïdjan se sont rencontres pour le deuxième
tete-a-tete de ce genre en quatre mois. Derrière des declarations
officielles pourtant peu porteuses d’espoir, les deux chefs d’Etat
ont clairement encourage leurs ministres des Affaires etrangères a
poursuivre leur dialogue.
Les points d’achoppement sont nombreux. Les Azeris ne peuvent conceder
plus qu’un statut de large autonomie pour le Karabakh, tandis que les
Armeniens exigent l’independance ou un rattachement a l’Armenie. Les
Armeniens envisageraient eventuellement de rendre les cinq districts
qu’ils occupent au sud du Karabakh, le long de la frontière iranienne,
mais refusent d’envisager le retour des districts de Latchin et
de Kelbajar sous contrôle azerbaïdjanais. Le corridor de Latchin,
qui permet le passage direct entre le Karabakh et l’Armenie, est
considere par les autorites de Stepanakert comme “une route de la vie”
non negociable. Quant au contrôle de Kelbajar, et particulièrement du
col d’Omar qui en donne accès, il represente un avantage strategique
central pour la defense eventuelle du Haut-Karabakh.
La solution pourrait resider dans la signature d’un accord qui
reglerait les choses par etapes, en repoussant la question du statut
definitif du Haut-Karabakh au terme du processus. Les Armeniens
retireraient progressivement leurs troupes des districts occupes,
qui passeraient sous contrôle international. Les deplaces internes
pourraient ainsi rentrer chez eux. L’accord prevoirait que, dès que
le retour des deplaces azeris sera effectue, tous les habitants du
Karabakh, Armeniens et Azeris qui y residaient jusqu’en1991, puissent
se prononcer par vote sur le statut final de la region. Toutes les
parties s’engageraient, sous garanties internationales, a respecter
le resultat de cette consultation, dût-il aboutir a l’independance
du territoire.
Les preoccupations strategiques armeniennes devraient etre prises au
serieux par l’interdiction qui serait faite a l’armee azerbaïdjanaise
de se redeployer dans les districts aujourd’hui occupes, et par
la possibilite pour les Armeniens de conserver des postes avances
d’observation dans des endroits aussi strategiques que le col d’Omar.
Le corridor de Latchine deviendrait un lieu de passage complètement
demilitarise, qui relierait Bakou a Agdam, Stepanakert, au sud de
l’Armenie, au Nakhichevan et a la Turquie.
Ce modèle permettrait de retablir les possibilites de communication
entre Azeris et Armeniens avant qu’une decision ne soit prise sur le
statut final du Karabakh. Mais afin de lui donner une petite chance de
succès, il est urgent que les gouvernements des deux parties fassent
cesser immediatement les campagnes de haine entretenues par leurs
medias. L’Azerbaïdjan pourrait investir plus judicieusement sa manne
petrolière dans son propre developpement plutôt que dans l’armement,
et l’Armenie devrait comprendre qu’il n’est pas sain, au debut du
XXIe siècle, de se profiler sur la scène internationale comme une
puissance occupante. Retablir les contacts entre les hommes est le
seul moyen de commencer a construire la paix.
–Boundary_(ID_SPSzm3wo+jifScVtgtrAVw)–
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Finland To Promote European Intergration Of Armenia

FINLAND TO PROMOTE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION OF ARMENIA
De Facto Agency, Armenia
Sept 28 2005
Armenia goes on working over the Plan of Actions within the European
Neighborhood Policy, stated RA President Robert Kocharyan in the
course of the joint press conference with Finnish President Tarja
Halonen on September 27.
In her turn President of Finland congratulated RA authorities on the
progress achieved in cooperation with the EU. When speaking about
Armenia’s Euro integration she stated democracy, human rights and
supremacy of law were each state’s bases.
Finnish President stated the necessity to determine the perspectives
of bilateral economic cooperation.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armed Separatism Showcased In South Ossetia

ARMED SEPARATISM SHOWCASED IN SOUTH OSSETIA
By Vladimir Socor
Eurasia Daily Monitor, DC
The Jamestown Foundation
Sept 22 2005
On September 19-20 in Tskhinvali, South Ossetian authorities led
celebrations of the 15th anniversary of the declaration of secession
from Georgia. Although the September 20, 1990, declaration and some
subsequent documents speak of “independence” and a “sovereign state,”
the authorities in practice seek outright annexation to Russia via
North Ossetia. A giant billboard just outside Tskhinvali, showing
Russian President Vladimir Putin with the caption, “Our President,”
in effect advertised that program during the festivities.
Yevgeny Trofimov (chairman of the Russian Duma’s Nationalities
Committee), Konstantin Zatulin (who is also director of the
government’s Institute on CIS Affairs), and other Duma deputies
attended the celebration, along with the Abkhaz de facto leader
Sergei Bagapsh (arriving directly from Moscow) and delegations from
Transnistria and Karabakh. These delegations, as well as guests from
North Ossetia, crossed the Russia-Georgia border unlawfully through
the Roki tunnel, which is controlled by Russian troops.
Ossetian troops with some 20 tanks and other armored vehicles,
anti-aircraft installations, and 10 infantry battalions took part
in a military parade in Tskhinvali’s central Stalin Street and
Stalin Square. The “defense ministers” of South Ossetia and Abkhazia,
Maj.-Generals Anatoly Barankevich and Sultan Sosnaliev — both seconded
by the Russian military to these posts — attended the parade.
The Russian “peacekeeping” commander, Maj.-General Marat Kulakhmetov,
pre-notified Tbilisi of some of the movements of those troops and
hardware toward Tskhinvali and conceded that those movements were
unlawful. However, his troops did nothing to stop this massive
breach of multiple agreements among Russia, Georgia, South Ossetia,
and the OSCE on force-reduction and demilitarization measures in the
“security zone.”
South Ossetia’s de facto leader Eduard Kokoiti signed with Bagapsh
a “treaty” on friendship and cooperation between Abkhazia and
South Ossetia — the type of move intended to suggest that the two
territories’ secession from Georgia is irreversible: “Our celebration
will demonstrate to the world that we are full-fledged democratic
states.” However, they made no secret of the shared goal for their
territories to become eventually parts of Russia.
Kokoiti signed an agreement with Russia’s North Ossetian republic
leader, Teimuraz Mansurov, to create a commission on “special
relations” and draft a comprehensive agreement to that effect. The
document proclaims the goal of “striving to preserve the unity of
Ossetia.” “There can be no other option than unification,” Mansurov
declared. In a similar vein, Kokoiti told the press conference, “We see
our future only in a single political, economic, and cultural space
with Ossetia and Russia.” Kokoiti also made a speech on “Ossetian
self-determination” in Russian. He and others at the celebration
summarily dismissed Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili’s offer
of autonomy and devolution of powers to South Ossetia as a “publicity
exercise for international consumption,” thus avoiding discussion of
the offer on its merits.
Georgia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs lodged a protest with Russia’s
Ministry of Foreign Affairs over Mamsurov’s actions in Tskhinvali.
“Inasmuch as the Russian side is fully responsible for actions of the
executive branch, Georgia regards the step taken by the head of North
Ossetia as an unfriendly move by Russia that encourages separatism.”
Parliament chairwoman Nino Burjanadze in turn “ask[ed] the
international community: Do we really need a peacekeeping force
under whose nose the separatist authorities are staging military
parades? A peacekeeping force that sits idly by while two separatist
presidents are proffering threats?” The parliament’s international
affairs committee chairman, Kote Gabashvili, noted that Russia is
now engaged in an ongoing annexation of South Ossetia after having
supported their secession. The Georgian parliament is now drafting a
resolution calling for basic changes to the “peacekeeping” operations
in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
On September 21 in the evening, three projectiles were fired from
grenade-launchers into Tskhinvali, injuring seven persons, most of
whom were released from ambulatory care that same evening, Kulakhmetov
announced. Both he and Russia’s MFA statement did not blame any side
for the incident. The festivities were not affected.
Georgia’s Defense Minister Irakli Okruashvili and parliamentary
defense committee chairman Givi Targamadze — who were visiting
nearby Georgian villages that day — rejected any suggestions that
Georgians were responsible. They, as well as State Minister for
Conflict Resolution Giorgi Khaindrava, noted that only Georgia’s
adversaries were interested in provoking such incidents. Saakashvili
promised an investigation and declared that Tskhinvali residents’
safety was “a matter of honor” to him.
In his speeches on September 14 at the summit of world leaders in
New York and on September 18 in Tbilisi, Saakashvili decried the
“intensive annexation” of Abkhazia and South Ossetia “with direct
support from outside,” and vowed that Georgia would never accept such
“despicable annexations” of parts of its territory.
The Tskhinvali events demonstrated also the OSCE’s irrelevance
regarding South Ossetia. The organization has only five or six military
observers, dual-based in Tbilisi and Tskhinvali, who are pathetically
under equipped with transport and communications, and thus unable
to detect most breaches of the agreements on force-reduction and
demilitarization in the “security zone.” The OSCE interprets its
mandate as being confined to the “security zone” around Tskhinvali,
which forms only a small part of South Ossetia’s territory. The
Mission declines to monitor Java, where Ossetian troops and their
heavy weaponry are stationed for quick deployment in Tskhinvali.
Politically, the Mission failed to react to the September 19
demonstration of military force, just as it had failed in June
2004 to react to the expedition of armed “volunteers” from Kuban,
Abkhazia, and Transnistria to South Ossetia and their exercises
with Ossetian troops. As custodian of the Helsinki Final Act and the
Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe, the OSCE would be obligated
to respond at least declaratively to the ongoing annexation of
Georgia’s territories and the parades of CFE-banned combat hardware
(“unaccounted-for treaty-limited equipment”). However, the OSCE
Mission — like the organization itself — is hostage to Moscow’s
veto in Vienna and thus unable to act unable to act in Tskhinvali.
(Rustavi-2 TV, Interfax, Russian TV Channel One, September 18-21)

BAKU: President Chairs Meeting On Army-Building

PRESIDENT CHAIRS MEETING ON ARMY-BUILDING
Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Sept 16 2005
A meeting on the development of Azerbaijan’s army-building chaired
by the President, Commander-in-chief Ilham Aliyev was held at the
Ministry of Defense on Friday.
During the discussions on future objectives, Aliyev said army building
is successfully developing in the country, its military potential
is strengthening and the process will continue to proceed rapidly in
the future.
The President said that Azerbaijan’s military spending will reach the
level of Armenia’s state budget soon, which alarms a number of forces.
“Armenians are concerned over our increasing military budget, which
is groundless. We are aware how much military aid Russia provided to
Armenia. But we do not interfere with this, as this is their internal
affair”, Aliyev said.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress