Amulsar Mine in Armenia: Government Must Avoid Potential Environmental and Human Disaster

FIDH – International Federation for Human Rights
June 20 2019
 

Erevan-Paris — Later this month the Armenian government will decide whether to allow mining company Lydian Armenia to resume its Amulsar mine operations. Initiated in a climate of corruption, the operations were suspended in August 2018 following strong opposition actions by local communities and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). FIDH warns against the disastrous toll that the mine’s operations would take on local communities.

The government’s decision will depend on the conclusion of the expert study it commissioned early this year to evaluate the risks of exploitation of the Amulsar mine. FIDH and and Civil Society Institute Armenia (CSI) conducted a fact-finding mission to Armenia and to the Amulsar region in April 2019, shedding light on the hazards which would be caused by the project. The mining project clearly prioritizes profit, with utter disregard for human rights and the environment.

In 2007, the mining company Lydian Armenia CJSC, a subsidiary of Lydian International, started its operation of exploration and feasibility for a gold mine extraction project in Armenia. Since 2012, experts and activists have denounced the negative impact of mining operations in Amulsar on health and the environment. Last year some residents blocked access to the mine and demanded the suspension of the project. In response, Lydian Armenia started a vigorous campaign to silence all critics, including human rights defenders.

In November 2018, approximately 3,000 citizens from the Jermuk Municipality, in which Amulsar is situated, signed a petition to stop the project, and on December 18, 2018, the Council of Jermuk Community decided to develop Jermuk Community as an environment-friendly economy, prohibiting metal mining on its territory. Nevertheless, the central government pressured this and other communities in Armenia, who decided against mining in their territory, to change their decisions, saying that this kind of decision cannot be taken locally.

Protesters point out the corrupted climate that led to the beginning of the project, the lack of proper consultation and the potential disastrous impacts that it will have on the water system of the area (the Keetchut reservoir), and by consequence on life and health of local residents and on the Lake Sevan, the biggest source of water of the country.

The heavy consequences that such project will certainly have on the town of Jermuk, are another source of concern. The town, one of the most celebrated resort towns of the Caucasus since the 18th century, well-known for the properties of its spring waters, clean air and peaceful environment, would likely be transformed into a mining town, undergoing irreparable damage. Farming—the main livelihood of people in the area—would also be heavily affected by air, water and soil pollution, as well as significant changes in the landscape.

During their fact-finding mission, FIDH and CSI met with several stakeholders working on the area: civil society organizations, activists, institutional representatives and international organizations. These encounters revealed that, despite progress and optimism linked to the new political climate, business activities—particularly those of the mining industry, including the Amulsar project—cause reason for concern not only for environmental issues but for also for human rights.(1)

Some of the Amulsar project’s problems documented by FIDH and CSI were also pointed out in a 2017 report by the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman of the International Finance Corporation, which has since then terminated its investment in the project. There are land acquisition issues and a lack of proper consultation with all affected communities, in particular with the Jermuk community that would be fundamentally impacted mine’s operations. “The issues pointed out in 2017 have not been addressed to date in any way by the government or the company and no other sustainable alternative has been explored or proposed to the community”, affirms Maddalena Neglia, head of the globalization and human rights desk at FIDH.

FIDH recently called the attention of the international community to Lydian Armenia’s worrying systematic judicial harassment and defamation campaigns aiming to silence critical journalists and human rights defenders, particularly women, working on the Amulsar case.

Lydian Armenia continues to pressure the Armenian government to allow operations to resume. In March 2019, for example, it notified the Armenian government of an existing dispute in front of arbitration tribunals for breach of UK and Canadian bilateral investment treaty, while it continued to criticize the Armenian government’s behavior via its web page and in investors’ forums.(2)

“The attitude taken by Lydian Armenia so far does not suggest any good for the future of the Jermuk community. We are deeply concerned that, once again, investors’ interests could be valued over the protection of people and the planet. How can we consider the destruction of the little paradise that is Jermuk and its surrounding area to be ‘sustainable development’?” asks Artak Kirakosyan, FIDH Vice President and Director of Civil Society Institute Armenia.

(1) FIDH believes that any government decision on Amulsar, or on investment projects more generally, should be based on proper human rights due diligence and not only on an environmental risk assessment, as required by the UNGPs and OECD Guidelines on multinational companies. Moreover, it should take into account the social impacts of the project on all affected communities, including on the town of Jermuk, and particularly on those who are most vulnerable, such as women and children.

(2) For example: https://www.juniorminingnetwork.com/junior-miner-news/press-releases/476-tsx/lyd/62119-lydian-announces-first-quarter-2019-results-and-corporate-update.html

https://www.fidh.org/en/region/europe-central-asia/armenia/amulsar-mine-in-armenia-government-must-avoid-potential-environmental

General Jeffrey Harrigian: My grandparents on my Dad’s side came from Armenia

News.am, Armenia
General Jeffrey Harrigian: My grandparents on my Dad’s side came from Armenia General Jeffrey Harrigian: My grandparents on my Dad’s side came from Armenia

00:37, 20.06.2019
                  

U.S. Air Force General Jeffrey Harrigian has Armenian roots, and his grandparents on father’s side came from Armenia.

General Harrigian who has recently assumed the command of NATO’s Allied Air Command, U.S. Air Forces in Europe and U.S. Air Forces Africa, responded to Armenian News-NEWS.am’s e-mail enquiry about his family and Armenian roots.

“My grandparents on my Dad’s side came from the Yerevan area in Armenia. My grandparents came through Ellis Island and ended up in Chicago,” he said.

General Harrigian added that his grandparents spoke Armenian. When asked whether his knows anything about Armenian traditions and cuisine, he replied: “I grew up eating Armenian food almost every weekend in my Dad’s parents’ house”. 

Harrigian is a fighter pilot who graduated from the Air Force Academy in 1985. He has more than 4,100 hours flying the F-22, F-15C.

General Harrigian said he is not the first military man in his family.

“I had an uncle serve in the Army and my Mom’s father served in the Navy,” he added.

Harrigian previously served as commander of Air Forces Central Command and the combined forces air component between 2016 and 2018, overseeing the air campaign against the Taliban in Afghanistan and against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 06/13/2019

                                        Thursday, 
Tsarukian Ignores Summons For Interrogation
        • Gayane Saribekian
Armenia -- Prosperous Armenia Party leader Gagik Tsarukian arrives for a 
parliament session in Yerevan, May 29, 2019.
An Armenian law-enforcement agency on Thursday condemned Prosperous Armenia 
Party (BHK) leader Gagik Tsarukian for ignoring a summons from its officials 
investigating an arson attack reported ahead of a local election won by a 
BHK-backed candidate.
The Investigative Committee planned to question Tsarukian as a witness in the 
case on Wednesday evening. The wealthy businessman leading Armenia’s largest 
parliamentary opposition force did not show up for the interrogation.
A spokeswoman for the committee, Naira Harutiunian, claimed that Tsarukian 
ripped up the summons after it was handed to him by law-enforcement officials 
on Tuesday.
“I think that as a member of the parliament Mr. Tsarukian had no right to 
behave like that because his action was disrespectful towards law-enforcement 
bodies,” she told RFE/RL’s Armenian service.
Harutiunian would not say whether the investigators will try to question 
Tsarukian again and what they will do if he ignores another summons. She also 
declined to explain why they want to talk to him in connection with the arson 
attack reported one day before Sunday s tense mayoral election in Abovian, a 
town just north of Yerevan that has long been the tycoon’s political stronghold.
Abovian’s pro-Tsarukian incumbent mayor, Vahagn Gevorgian, narrowly defeated 
his main challenger representing Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s Civil 
Contract party. The latter’s election campaign manager, Vahan Saribekian, said 
his car and apartment door were set on fire early on Saturday. He blamed the 
BHK for the attack.
The BHK denied any responsibility for it. Tsarukian and his associates 
suggested that the incident was faked for political purposes.
“The prime minister must order [law-enforcement authorities] to solve that 
case,” Tsarukian told reporters on Monday.
“We continue to suspect that what happened in Abovian was a stage-managed 
show,” Naira Zohrabian, a senior BHK figure, said on Thursday. She challenged 
the Armenian police to “dispel or confirm our concerns.”
Pashinian’s relations with Tsarukian have been tense since April. In May, the 
pro-government majority in Armenia’s parliament implicitly threatened to strip 
Tsarukian of his parliament seat, saying that his entrepreneurial activities 
may be illegal. The BHK leader, who is one of Armenia’s richest men, insisted 
that he complies with a constitutional provision that bars lawmakers from 
directly engaging in business.
EU Boosts Aid To Armenia
BELGIUM -- Armenian Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanian (L) is welcomed by EU 
Foreign Policy chief Federica Mogherini at the start of an EU-Armenia 
Partnership Council meeting in Brussels, .
The European Union on Thursday announced 25 million euros ($28 million) in 
additional assistance to Armenia and expressed its readiness to finance 
large-scale infrastructure projects proposed by the Armenian government.
The EU foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, hailed “democratic reforms” 
implemented in Armenia after chairing, together with Armenian Foreign Minister 
Zohrab Mnatsakanian, a second session of the EU-Armenia Partnership Council.
The council is tasked with overseeing the implementation of the landmark 
Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement (CEPA) signed by the two sides 
in 2017.
The CEPA offers the South Caucasus state the prospect of a closer relationship 
with the EU in return for major political and economic reforms. It commits 
Yerevan to gradually “approximating” Armenian economic laws and regulations to 
the EU’s legal framework.
“The implementation of our agreement is proceeding well,” Mogherini told a 
joint news conference with Mnatsakanian in Brussels. “The dialogue, cooperation 
and partnership we have on different issues … is excellent, and we also have 
good plans for the future.”
“Based on the country’s performance, democratic reforms during the last year, 
the EU will allocate an additional 25 million euros this year, bringing the 
total allocation for this year to 65 million euros, to support Armenia in its 
reforms and in implementing effectively our agreement,” Mogherini said.
She said the EU is also “identifying funding possibilities for the priority 
projects that Armenia has recently presented to the European Commission.” They 
relate to not only public infrastructures but also energy efficiency, police 
reform and women’s rights, she added.
BELGIUM -- Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian (L) and the President of the 
European Council Donald Tusk arrive for a joint statement to the media 
following their meeting in Brussels, March 5, 2019
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian requested EU funding for his “mega projects” 
when he visited Brussels in March. Pashinian said after that trip that the EU 
is ready to support them provided that they are co-financed by the Armenian 
government.
The head of the EU Delegation in Yerevan, Piotr Switalski, said last month that 
some of these projects are “very costly and very complicated.” “But we are very 
seriously considering how best to implement them,” he told RFE/RL’s Armenian 
service.
According to Mogherini, the EU is also ready to provide “substantial support” 
for sweeping judicial reforms planned by the Pashinian administration. “We 
support the ongoing work aimed at a comprehensive judicial reform in Armenia in 
line with the Armenian constitution and with international standards,” she 
said. “An independent, efficient and accountable judiciary benefits all.”
Mnatsakanian described the Partnership Council meeting as “very productive.” He 
reaffirmed Yerevan’s commitment to closer ties with the EU, saying that Armenia 
and the 28-nation bloc share a “common civilizational heritage” and commitment 
to democracy.
Pashinian has also repeatedly stressed the importance of closer ties with the 
EU for Armenia. He has made clear at the same time that his country will remain 
part of the Russian-led alliances of former Soviet republics.
Constitutional Court Nominee Vows Impartiality
        • Astghik Bedevian
        • Ruzanna Stepanian
Armenia -- Vahe Grigorian, a nominee to the Constitutional Court, talks to 
journalists, Yerevan, .
President Armen Sarkissian’s latest nominee to the Constitutional Court said on 
Thursday that his warm relations with members of Armenia’s new ruling elite 
would not influence his judicial activities.
Sarkissian again nominated lawyer Vahe Grigorian for a vacant seat in the 
country’s highest court late last month after the current Armenian parliament 
rejected two other candidates chosen by him.
The head of state first proposed Grigorian’s candidacy last fall. The then 
Armenian parliament dominated by supporters of the former government refused to 
approve it.
Grigorian is believed to enjoy the backing of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
and the ruling My Step alliance, which holds a two-thirds majority in the 
current National Assembly. My Step representatives say, however, that the 
parliament majority’s support for his appointment is not a forgone conclusion. 
The parliament is due to debate and vote on the nomination next week.
Grigorian met with deputies from the opposition Bright Armenia Party (LHK) on 
Wednesday. The LHK leader, Edmon Marukian, voiced misgivings about the nominee 
after the meeting.
In particular, Marukian pointed to some lawyers’ belief that the Armenian 
constitution does not allow the president to nominate the same person for a 
second time. He also said that Grigorian’s “close ties with the authorities” 
could “inhibit” the would-be judge.
Grigorian dismissed such concerns, while acknowledging his friendly rapport 
with many members of Pashinian’s political team.
“Regarding those from the ruling majority who know me personally, I didn’t meet 
them first at barbecue parties,” he told reporters after meeting with My Step 
deputies on Thursday. “When I met them for the first time they didn’t hold any 
state positions. I have worked with many people from all political circles, not 
just My Step. I met with some of those people in prison. When I was in prison 
they dealt with [Grigorian’s case.]”
“It’s very normal when a person trusts someone they know,” said Grigorian. “I 
cannot castigate anyone for that.”
Grigorian went on to insist as a Constitutional Court judge he would not be 
influenced by these relationships in any way. “Any decision will be my 
decision,” he said. “I will never try to justify myself by saying that I was 
under [government] pressure. As soon as I find myself under pressure I will 
cease to be a judge, if I am elected a judge.”
Grigorian also made no secret of his readiness to become the Constitutional 
Court’s new chairman. “It’s up to the judges to decide. I’m ready [for that 
role,]” he said.
The current court chairman, Hrayr Tovmasian, is a former justice minister and 
senior lawmaker who represented the former ruling Republican Party (HHK). The 
HHK-controlled parliament named him to head the court in March 2018.
Another Armenian Judicial Official Resigns
Armenia -- The main meeting room of the Supreme Judicial Council, Yerevan, 
April 10, 2019.
Yet another member of the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC), a state body 
overseeing Armenia’s courts, stepped down on Thursday.
The official, Armen Khachatrian, gave no reason for the move in his letter of 
resignation publicized by the SJC. Khachatrian said only that he will “continue 
to support the process of judicial reforms” in his other capacity as chairman 
of Armenia’s Bankruptcy Court.
Khachatrian was elected to the newly established SJC by an assembly of 
Armenia’s judges in March 2018. He is the third member of the judicial watchdog 
to resign in the last three weeks.
The SJC chairman, Gagik Harutiunian, tendered his resignation on May 24, citing 
“ongoing developments relating to the judicial authority” and his “concerns 
expressed in that regard.” His temporary replacement, Gevorg Danielian, quit on 
June 7.
The concerns cited by Harutiunian followed Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s May 
19 appeal to his supporters to block the entrances to all court buildings in 
the country. The appeal came the day after a Yerevan court ordered former 
President Robert Kocharian released from jail pending the outcome of his trial 
on coup and corruption charges. The court’s decision angered many allies and 
supporters of Pashinian.
Speaking at a May 20 meeting with senior state officials, Pashinian said that 
Armenian courts remain linked to “the former corrupt system” and distrusted by 
the population. He announced plans for a mandatory “vetting” of all judges.
Harutiunian was among the officials invited to the emergency meeting. However, 
he did not attend it because of being unable to leave the SJC building in 
downtown Yerevan blockaded by government loyalists.
Press Review
“Zhoghovurd” says it is only natural that pro-government parliamentarians 
“protect the interests of the executive branch.” “State officials now need 
support more than ever before because often times artificial tensions are 
created towards state officials,” writes the paper. “On the other hand, we have 
a situation where police officers can beat up a plainclothes man. What is 
bewildering is that when a representative of the [opposition] Bright Armenia 
party, Gevorg Gorgisian, reported the incident he was countered by [fellow 
lawmaker] Nikolay Baghdasarian of the [ruling] My Step bloc. The latter 
insisted that such things are not possible in the New Armenia. However, the 
police did not deny the incident and an internal inquiry is now underway.”
“Aravot” continues to slam a minibus driver in Yerevan who was fired after 
ignoring a commuter’s demand to stop smoking. The driver now wants to meet with 
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and present his side of the story. The paper 
says that the government should not bow to pressures from any citizens flouting 
laws. It says Pashinian’s government already made a serious mistake when it 
forgave thousands of car owners that had refused to pay fines imposed on them 
for violations of traffic rules. Citizens must have no doubts that any 
delinquent behavior will have serious consequences for them, concludes the 
paper.
“Zhamanak” wonders whether former President Serzh Sarkisian’s visits to 
Nagorno-Karabakh are meant to help ward off “external dangers” facing the 
Armenians or “exert or generate pressure on the new Armenian authorities from 
there.” The paper also speculates that “some Russian circles” are trying to 
gain a foothold in Karabakh after being driven out of Armenia. “It is the same 
circles that have been targeting the Armenian velvet revolution for quite a 
while, gently blaming Serzh Sarkisian in the process for bringing things to 
such a conclusion,” it says. “They are openly saying that the revolution would 
not have happened had he not opted for a third term in office.”
(Lilit Harutiunian)
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2019 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org

A1+: Ararat Mirzoyan presents developments in our country following the Velvet Revolution to CoE delegation

President of the National Assembly of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan received on May 31 the high-ranking delegation of the Council of Europe, comprised of Council of Europe Director General of the Human Rights and Rule of Law Christos Giakoumopoulos, Venice Commission Secretary Thomas Markert, Head of the Department of Justice and Legal Cooperation Hanne Juncker,  Executive Secretary of the Group of States against Corruption(GRECO) Gianluca Esposito, Head of the Council of Europe Office in Yerevan Natalia Voutova and  political consultant Maxim Longang.

As the press service of the parliament of Armenia reports, greeting the guests, the head of the legislative presented in detail the developments following the velvet revolution in Armenia, spoke about the reforms in various spheres, including electoral, judicial, taxation and the steps aimed at fighting corruption, future development of democracy and future strengthening of civil society. Ararat Mirzoyan also told the guests about his visions on transitional justice.

“For us it’s important that the reforms be institutional, which will ensure the continuity of the adopted policy”, Mirzoyan said.

Thanking for the warm reception, Christos Giakoumopoulos said that the goal of their visit is to discuss with the authorities and different partners issues such as the independence of the judicial system, right to a fair trial, fight against corruption, and protection of human rights. According to him, based on the assessment of the situation, the different bodies of the CoE will offer short and medium term support and the future directions for cooperation will be outlined.

The sides highlighted ensuring inclusiveness during the reform process with the participation of different political forces and the civil society,

The President of the National Assembly of Armenia expressed gratitude to the bodies of the Council of Europe for their support in different spheres, as well as their readiness for partnership in the future.


Iran offers Persian Gulf countries to sign non-aggression pact

Iran offers Persian Gulf countries to sign non-aggression pact

Save

Share

15:36,

YEREVAN, MAY 26, ARMENPRESS. Iran has offered countries of the Persian Gulf to sign a non-aggression pact amid heightened tensions in the region.

Iran’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Mohammad Javad Zarif made the proposal during a meeting with Iraqi Minister of Foreign Affairs Mohamed Ali Alhakim, according to RIA Novosti.

Zarif emphasized that Iran wants to have excellent relations with Persian Gulf countries and welcomes any proposal on de-escalating the tension.

Earlier a source close to the Iraqi Prime Minister told RIA Novosti that Iraq, together with Russia and 4 other countries, is mediating the resolution of the conflict between Washington and Tehran.

Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan




We are in the homeland. Davit Babayan about Bako Sahakyan’s stay in Yerevan

  • 20.05.2019
  •  

  • Armenia:
  •  

     

 177

I can neither deny nor confirm that information. Speaking to VERELQ, Davit Babayan, the spokesperson of the President of the Republic of Artsakh, said this, responding to the news that Bako Sahakyan will meet with members of the National Assembly “My Step” faction in Yerevan today. 


“If there is a meeting, you will be informed,” he said.


Babayan diplomatically avoided a clear answer to the question of whether he is in Yerevan at the moment.


“We are in the homeland,” he added.


Nevertheless, VERELQ sources claim that Bako Sahakyan will face a tough meeting, especially after today’s announcement by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

When Politics and Football Collide

First Post

Century-long conflict could keep Armenian Henrikh Mkhitaryan out of the Europa League final in Azerbaijan

                                                                 

By Aakriti Mehrotra

Arsenal have the chance to put a mediocre domestic season behind them and secure Champions League football by winning the Europa League final against Chelsea in Baku, Azerbaijan. For reasons beyond their control though, the Gunners may have to do without the services of their mercurial midfielder, Henrikh Mkhitaryan.

Mkhitaryan is Armenian. Relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan are, to put it mildly, hostile. The two countries, along with parts of Turkey, Russia and Georgia once formed the Transcaucasian Federation. When it disintegrated at the end of World War I, Armenia and Azerbaijan, now independent, went to war over some disputed territories. Enter the Soviet Union — the Big Fish.

Both countries were annexed by the communist behemoth and in 1923, the Soviets created an autonomous region called Nagorno Karabakh within Azerbaijan, with an ethnic Armenian majority. The reasons for this are not germane here — suffice to say that Soviet self-interest was at play.

Status quo reigned until 1988 when the USSR began to crumble. Nagorno Karabakh declared independence, Armenia sided with them and war broke out with Azerbaijan. 25,000 people were killed, more than a million displaced and horrific atrocities committed by both sides. A ceasefire, ironically brokered by Russia, came into effect in 1994 and Nagorno Karabakh has existed in a state of political limbo since then.

Meanwhile, the brutal war between Armenia and Azerbaijan has sowed the seeds for seething hatred that continues to this day. There are no international peacekeeping forces on the ground, which has resulted in regular skirmishes between both sides.

Citizens of Armenia, as well as those of other countries who are of Armenian descent or those who have ever visited Nagorno-Karabakh, are forbidden entry to Azerbaijan. For athletes or those participating in events, it is customary for governing bodies and ministries to sort these matters out. In 2012, Azerbaijan hosted the Eurovision Song Contest and Armenians were granted entry, although the contingent eventually withdrew from the competition.


In 2015, Baku hosted the first European Games, a multi-sport event. The Armenian delegation was granted visas and was amongst the 50 National Olympic Committees (NOCs) to participate.

Even though the choice of a venue that is not welcoming to everyone for a showpiece final has been criticised, it is important to note that precedence and reassurances given by UEFA and Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry suggest that Mkhitaryan will be allowed to participate and that “all necessary security measures would be in place”. An Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry spokesperson even went on to add that “sports and politics are separate”.

That is nonsense of course. Sports and nationality are inextricably linked to politics. Borussia Dortmund opted to leave Mkhitaryan behind for their Europa League clash against Azeri club Gabala in 2015. Arsenal too opted to travel without the midfielder for their match against FK Qarabag in the current campaign. Qarabag coach Gurban Gurbanov had then claimed that the Gunners had “tried to save” Mkhitaryan from the “pressure” of playing in Azerbaijan. Well, yes.

Europe’s contentious history often throw up such situations. The Champions League final is being held in Madrid this year. Had it been in Belgrade, Liverpool midfielder Xherdan Shaqiri may well have missed the summit clash with Tottenham. Shaqiri is a Swiss national who fled his native Kosovo to escape Serbian persecution and made the ‘double-eagle’ gesture – a symbol of his ethnic Albanian heritage — every time he scored during the 2018 World Cup. The Serbians were incensed, with players and fans exchanging verbal barbs.

Shaqiri did not travel with Liverpool for their Champions League group game against Red Star Belgrade this season, with manager Jurgen Klopp saying the decision was based on “common sense” and “to make sure we can be focused on football.” The Reds would go on to lose 2-0 but in the final reckoning it didn’t have much of an impact on their European ambitions.

Much more will be at stake when Arsenal meet Chelsea in the final. Despite their storied history, the Gunners have won only one European trophy of note — the Cup Winners’ Cup in 1994. A Europa League win would go some way in filling this gaping hole in their resume. Not only that, having missed out on Champions League qualification for next season thanks to their fifth-placed finish in the Premier League, the only way they can do so now is by winning Europe’s second-tier tournament. Arsenal need all hands on deck.

Eventually, it will boil down to the collective choice made by Mkhitaryan and club management. The player has been pushed down the pecking order at the Emirates and didn’t start for Emery in both legs of the semi-final and the quarter-final. He could still be influential though — he has scored in a Europa League final before for Manchester United — but would his involvement be worth the risk? And will he be able to handle inevitable booing from the locals? The pressure may be too much, even for a footballer.

Your guide to the latest election news, analysis, commentary, live updates and schedule for Lok Sabha Elections 2019 on firstpost.com/elections. Follow us on Twitter and Instagram or like our Facebook page for updates from all 543 constituencies for the upcoming general elections.

Welcome

  • 1. If you are in certain parts of Delhi NCR or Mumbai you can subscribe for doorstep delivery. Digital subscription comes free with it.
  • 2. If you are outside this distribution zone you can access the full bouquet of Firstpost Print content online for a limited period.
  • 3. You may sample up to five stories, following which you will need to sign up for continued access.

Please choose one of the options…

continue reading story subscribe to print sample more stories

Advertisement

Advertisement


RFE/RL Armenian Report – 05/09/2019

                                        Thursday, 
Pashinian Attends Annual Celebrations In Karabakh
Nagorno-Karabakh -- Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian (C), Karabakh 
President Bako Sahakian (R) and Archbishop Pargev Martirosian leave a newly 
built church in Stepanakert, May 9, 2019.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian visited Nagorno-Karabakh on Thursday to 
celebrate the 74th anniversary of the Soviet victory in World War II and 
Karabakh’s main public holiday.
The holiday is dedicated to the May 1992 capture by Karabakh Armenian forces of 
Shushi (Shusha), a formerly Azerbaijani-populated strategic town overlooking 
Stepanakert. The military operation proved crucial for the Armenian victory in 
the 1991-1994 war with Azerbaijan.
“The liberation of Shushi, the cradle of the Artsakh Armenians, was one of the 
most heroic and brilliant pages of our history,” Pashinian said in a statement 
issued on the occasion.
Thursday’s celebrations began with hundreds of people led by Pashinian and Bako 
Sahakian, the Karabakh president, marching to World War II and Karabakh war 
memorials in Stepanakert. They also laid flowers at a nearby military cemetery 
where scores of Karabakh Armenians killed in action were laid to rest.
Nagorno-Karabakh -- Armenian an Karabakh leaders lead a festive march in 
Stepanakert, May 9, 2019.
The Armenian and Karabakh leaders then headed to Shushi where Sahakian hosted 
an official reception.
Pashinian and Sahakian held talks in Stepanakert after the official ceremonies. 
Their press offices gave no details of the talks.
The annual celebrations in Karabakh began on Wednesday. They were attended by 
Armenia’s Karabakh-born former President Serzh Sarkisian, who was the 
Armenian-populated territory’s top military commander at the start of the war. 
Sarkisian refused to answer questions from an RFE/RL reporter when he and 
Sahakian emerged from a state building in Stepanakert.
Kocharian’s Trial Set For May 13
        • Naira Bulghadarian
Armenia - President Robert Kocharian (R) and his senior adviser Armen Gevorgian 
at an election campaign rally in Yerevan, January 26, 2003.
The trial of Robert Kocharian and three other former senior officials 
prosecuted in connection with the 2008 post-election unrest in Yerevan will 
start on May 13, lawyers for Armenia’s ex-president said on Thursday.
Judicial authorities did not immediately confirm the date of what will be one 
of the most high-profile trials in Armenia’s history.
Kocharian, his former chief of staff Armen Gevorgian and retired army Generals 
Seyran Ohanian and Yuri Khachaturov stand accused of “overthrowing the 
constitutional order” in the wake of a disputed presidential election held in 
February 2008. Investigators say they illegally used Armenian army units 
against supporters of the main opposition presidential candidate who protested 
against alleged electoral fraud.
All four men deny the charges. Kocharian, the only suspect held in pre-trial 
detention, says that they are part of a political “vendetta” waged by Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian.
Pashinian was one of the main opposition speakers during the 2008 protests. He 
subsequently spent about two years in prison for organizing what the former 
Armenian authorities characterized as “mass disturbances.”
Eight protesters and two police servicemen were killed as security forces 
quelled those protests on March 1-2, 2008. Kocharian ordered army units into 
central Yerevan during the violence.
Khachaturov served as deputy defense minister while Ohanian was the chief of 
the Armenian army’s General Staff at the time. Ohanian has repeatedly denied 
the army’s involvement in the post-election political processes.
Earlier this year, Kocharian was also charged with receiving a $3 million bribe 
from an Armenian businesswoman, Silva Hambardzumian. Prosecutors say that 
Hambardzumian also paid a separate $1 million kickback to Gevorgian. The latter 
became Armenia’s deputy prime minister after Kocharian handed over power to 
Serzh Sarkisian in April 2008.
Both Kocharian and Gevorgian deny the corruption accusations as well.
World Bank To Fund More Road Construction In Armenia
Armenia -- A road in the Syunik province, September 3, 2018.
The World Bank has disbursed a $15 million loan that will be spent on 
rebuilding and repairing 61 kilometers of more roads across Armenia.
The bank announced on Thursday that the Armenian government will contribute 
$3.8 million to the “additional financing” approved by it as part of the 
Lifeline Road Improvement Project (LRIP) launched in 2009. It said 433 
kilometers of Armenian roads have already been upgraded thanks to the LRIP.
“Despite visible improvement in the last decade, about 40 percent of the roads 
in Armenia remain in poor condition, and one-third of the rural population 
lacks access to an all-weather road,” read a statement released by the World 
Bank.
“The rehabilitation of additional lifeline roads will facilitate better access 
to jobs, markets, and other basic social services for over 60,000 people in the 
provinces,” it quoted Sylvie Bossoutrot, the bank’s country manager for 
Armenia, as saying.
This will allow local farmers and small business owners to “bring their 
products to market more easily and at a lower cost,” said Bossoutrot.
The disbursement raised to almost $2.4 billion the total amount of mainly 
low-interest loans provided by the World Bank to Armenia since 1992. It will 
solidify the bank’s status as the South Caucasus state’s leading foreign 
creditor.
The Armenian government is also planning to finance other road projects from 
the state budget. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian said on Wednesday that most of 
62 billion drams ($129 million) in additional taxes which the government 
intends to collect this year will be spent on road construction.
Yerevan Denies Blacklisting Ukrainian Lawmaker At Russia’s Behest
        • Artak Khulian
Ukraine -- Ukrainian lawmaker Mustafa Nayyem gestures as he speaks to AFP 
journalist in his office in Kyiv, March 19, 2019.
The National Security Service (NSS) insisted on Wednesday that Russia was not 
responsible for the fact that a Ukrainian lawmaker was briefly prevented from 
entering Armenia after landing at Yerevan airport last week.
The lawmaker, Mustafa Nayyem, flew to Yerevan on April 30 to attend a 
conference as a private person. He told RFE/RL’s Armenian service on May 1 that 
it took more than two hours before he was allowed to leave the Zvartnots 
international airport.
Nayyem said immigration officers there told him that he had been barred from 
entering Armenia at the request of “a third country.” “After the [Ukrainian] 
consulate and the organizers of the conference intervened, I was finally 
allowed to enter Armenia for once,” he said.
Nayyem said he was later told by Armenian politicians and Ukrainian Embassy 
officials that Russia and Armenia are in coordination regarding Ukrainian 
citizens who are on Moscow's sanctions list.
The NSS director, Artur Vanetsian, dismissed Nayyem’s claims about Russian 
interference as “disinformation.” But he did confirm that the lawmaker was on 
an NSS list of “undesirable” individuals banned from entering Armenia.
“As soon as I was told that such an incident has occurred the issue was sorted 
out and Mustafa Nayyem entered Armenia,” Nayyem told RFE/RL’s Armenian service. 
“And Mustafa Nayyem stayed at the airport for roughly 40 minutes. There had 
been no interference by Russia.”
Vanetsian claimed that the Ukrainian politician critical of Moscow had been 
blacklisted by the NSS because of a “technical error.” He said that the 
blacklist contained the names of as many as 30,000 foreign nationals and that 
he significantly shortened it after being appointed as head of the security 
service one year ago.
Artur Sakunts, an Armenian human rights activist, dismissed this explanation, 
challenging the NSS to clarify why it regarded Nayyem as an “undesirable” 
person in the first place. Sakunts said he believes Russian authorities had 
told Yerevan to blacklist Nayyem because of the latter’s strong condemnations 
of Russia’s annexation of Ukraine's Crimean peninsula in 2014.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2019 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org

‘For Israel, It’s Just Trade, But for Us, It’s Death,’ Says Mnatsakanyan about Arm Sales to Baku

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanyan

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanyan gave what can be deemed as one of the most resolute responses by Yerevan to the continued arm sales by Israel it Azerbaijan.

“For Israel, it’s just trade, but for us, it’s death,” Mnatsakanyan told Israeli journalist Yossi Melman during an interview, which was published in the Jerusalem Post on Friday.

“Israel’s arms trade is a weapon of death for our people. We have been witnessing the use of such weapons against our people. We have losses because of your weapons that are used against us. We are a security conscious nation and are highly confident in our capacity to defend ourselves, and you will understand very well what that means,” Mnatsakanyan told Melman, adding that Israel’s relations with Azerbaijan, including selling of weapons to Baku “remains an issue of great concern for us on several counts.”

“At the same time,” he said, “we are dedicated to developing peace and security in our region. The arms race in our region does not contribute to building peace and security.”

“We are very insistent that building relations with one partner will not be at the expense of another partner. But we also expect that all our partners will do the same. We are also very sensitive to the sensitivities of our partners,” added Mnatsakanyan.

On the issue of Israel’s refusal to recognize the Armenian Genocide, Mnatsakanyan placed the onus directly on Israel for failing to advance justice and humanity.

“It’s not a matter for me to be surprised. I represent a nation that still faces the pressure of justice denied over 105 years. My people are victories [sic] because we were supposed to be wiped off the face of the earth.”

“The question of denied justice is about humanity. It is for Israel to decide whether to recognize [the Armenian genocide] or not. It is not about Armenia, it is about Israel. It is our collective duty nowadays to reduce the risk of genocide and atrocities,” said Mnatsakanyan.

The foreign minister sounded upbeat about advancing relations between Armenia and Israel, citing the many common attributes that drive both nations. Recently, Armenia signaled that it would open an embassy in Israel.

“Our two peoples have so much in common: suffering, rich histories and cultures,” said Mnatsakanyan.

“We have a great history and civilization. We have an enormous sense of national identity and pride, so we can work together in so many fields of economy, agriculture, hi-tech, tourism, direct flights, health culture, education and so on and so forth,” added the foreign minister.

Tbilisi: Recognition of Genocide demanded by Armenian Citizens of Georgia

The Messenger, Georgia
April 25 2019
Recognition of Genocide demanded by Armenian Citizens of Georgia
By Natalia Kochiashvili
Thursday, April 25

As of 2019, governments and parliaments of 30 countries, including Austria, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Russia, as well as 49 states out of 50 of the United States, have recognized the events as a genocide.

On April 24, Armenians all over the world are recalling the memory of victims of the genocide of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire. All Armenian diaspora – they are mainly descendants of victims of the genocide of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire – organize events dedicated to memory in every country of the world.

On April 24, 1915, Constantinople began mass arrest and persecution of Armenians, which lasted until September 1918. More than a million Armenians died in three years. About so many Ottoman Empire fled and scattered all over the world. Armenian Genocide recognition is the formal acceptance that the systematic massacres and forced deportation of Armenians committed by the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to 1923 constituted genocide.

Some governments, including Georgian, have been reticent to officially acknowledge the killings as genocide. Reasons for that are thought to be political concerns about their relations with the Republic of Turkey, the successor state of the Ottoman Empire. The governments of Turkey and its close ally the Republic of Azerbaijan are the only ones that directly deny the historical factuality of the Armenian Genocide, and both opposed to the recognition of the genocide by other nations, threatening economic and diplomatic consequences to recognizers. Turkey’s official position is that the number of Armenian victims was way less and it was caused by civil unrest and not the Ottoman Empire’s intentional policy to destroy Armenians.

“Recognize!” – On April 24 of every year, the Armenian population of Samtskhe-Javakheti recalls the massacre with words, posters, flags, and candles. Ethnic Armenian citizens of Georgia are traditionally gathering “stone rocks” and call on the Turkish authorities and other countries to recognize the Armenian tragedy as the genocide of the First World War.

In Akhaltsikhe and Akhalkalaki, the movement started on the evening of April 23 and continued in the morning of April 24. Encell Mkoyan, the majoritarian MP of Akhalkalaki and Ninotsminda, says that on this day all the Armenians living in the world say: “April 24th we are crying because millions of Armenians were killed in 1915 and we never forget them, many of the world’s developed countries have recognized the genocide and the list is expanding annually.”

Must be also noted, that in 2015, on the 100th anniversary of the genocide Armenian religious and secular organizations in Georgia have petitioned to the country’s parliament. They requested Georgian Parliament to begin formal debates on the recognition of the genocide of the Armenian people from 1915 to 1923. As of today, we can tell that demands were fruitless.