ABN joins AGBU New England 110th Anniversary Celebrations

Dear ABN Members;

AGBU of New England celebrates 110 years of history and progress this
weekend as they pay tribute to the founding of AGBU New England and look
forward to the tradition of excellence in action.

ABN is joining the celebrations in show of support to our AGBU members and
the organization that has supported Armenians and the Armenian community since
its inception. The AGBU events planning committee has prepared a wonderful
program for this weekend. Please review the following events and make an effort
to join the festivities.

AGBU YP – Success through Synergy

Cocktail reception and town hall discussion with AGBU Central Board including
President Berge Setrakian!

Friday June 1, 2018

District Hall

75 Northern Avenue

Boston, MA 02110

Cocktail Reception: 6:00-6:30pm

Discussion: 6:30-7:30pm

RSVP to guarantee entry: [email protected]

 

 

AGBU YP – Club Night

Friday June 1, 2018

The Grand

58 Seaport Boulevard

Boston, MA 02210

Tickets: www.agbune.org

pp: $40 online – $50 @ the door

 

 

AGBU New England – 

110th Anniversary Celebrations

 

Saturday June 2, 2018

Samberg Conference Center

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Cambridge, MA
Cocktail Reception & Silent Auction @6:00pm

Dinner & Program @7:30pm

Tickets: www.agbune.org

pp: $200 (space is limited)



Thank you,

My Karabakh – Part IV: The Sumgait chronicles

JAM News

Armenian journalist and writer Mark Grigoryan writes about his experiences on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

Armenian journalist and writer Mark Grigoryan describes his experiences on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in a series of essays written exclusively for JAMnews.

This is the fourth installment.

Parts I, II and III can be found below:

My Karabakh – Part I: Hadrut, a donkey, water and a brawl

My Karabakh – Part II: 1988 – The Karabakh protests begin

My Karabakh – Part III: Summer of 1988 – Yerevan demands that Karabakh be returned

Yerevan, 1988. Photo: Ruben Mangasaryan

A decision was made by the Council of People’s Deputies of the Nagorno-Karabakh oblast to address the supreme councils of Azerbaijan and Armenia with a request to transfer control of the region from the former to the latter. This, in complete accordance with the laws of the USSR, was one of the main moments of the events surrounding Karabakh.

It took place in February 1988, but the decision made by the oblast deputies only took on relevance in the beginning of summer when the Supreme Council of Armenia, pressured by the demonstrations, strikes and protests, finally decided to give its approval to the absorption of Karabakh into Armenia.

However, the authorities of Azerbaijan made an unsurprising statement two days later: Karabakh is part of Azerbaijan.

A month went by. The presidium of the Supreme Council of the USSR held a plenum which was broadcasted live on television: the presidium declared that Karabakh would remain part of Azerbaijan.

If one were to speak in purely political terms, then this should have put an end to Armenia’s demands as a clear decision had been made, and Moscow had no intention of stepping back from it. 

B

ut the fact that neither Baku nor Moscow would agree to ‘give away’ Nagorno-Karabakh would have been immediately understandable to any observer from the very beginning: the orders that came from Moscow and Baku never gave anyone reason to hope for such a generous gesture. The authorities of the Soviet Union were not used to hearing the opinions of their subjects. It was the other way around: the subjects had to listen to what they were told. Listen, and carry out.

Anger and bitterness started to appear in the Yerevan demonstrations. People felt that they had reached a dead end. But despite that, I don’t remember any of the people in my circle asking out-loud: “Was that all for nothing? Can it be that the people who died in Sumgait and Karabakh have lost their lives in vain?”

But the question quietly arose in everyone’s mind, and had the situation not dramatically changed it would have been voiced at one point or another.  

But we weren’t interested in such questions at that point. We protested Moscow’s decision, and went on strike.

I also went on strike. Not alone of course, but with the institute where I was due to finish working in just several weeks’ time. At the institute we held a long, noisy meeting, then voted, and went on strike.

While leaving my office for the protest, I brought an Ukraina typewriter with in order to finish typing my dissertation. In those days I had practically stopped going to the demonstrations, because writing my dissertation was taking up most of my time.

I was so busy that I almost entirely stopped going to the Writers Union, where my friend and classmate Samvel Shakhmuradyan – or Shakh, as we used to call him – worked.

I previously wrote about him: he was the one who took me to the first Karabakh protest. Towards the middle of 1988, Shakh was already a rather well-known journalist and publicist and was trying his hand at writing.

Sometimes I’d check in on him, but even when I did pop into his small room on the second floor, it would often seem that he was pressed for time; Shakh had thrown himself head-first into his work for the Karabakh committee. He was always in a hurry, and there was always somebody in his office where the telephone would ring off the hook non-stop and cigarette smoke hung thick in the air above our heads.

B

ut Shakh one day called me in himself and offered to meet. For me, this meeting was important for my understanding of the tragic side of the Karabakh conflict, which until then had been overshadowed by the events in Yerevan: going to demonstrations, discussing the political situation, and the mandatory, periodical visitations to Opera Square when it wasn’t cordoned off by troops and protesters.

And this when we were already hearing rumors about the coming ethnic cleansing in Azerbaijan and Armenia. One could already hear stories about the pogroms and attacks on Armenian homes in cities across Azerbaijan. We had already heard how ‘Azerbaijanis from such and such a region had started leaving’. But my world and my understanding of all of these events remained entirely oriented and dependent on Yerevan.

When we met, Shakh proposed that I help him work on a book which he was intensely focused on at the moment. The book was supposed to be called The Sumgait Tragedy Through the Testimonies of Eyewitnesses.

I agreed immediately. My role was such: Shakh gave me cassettes with interviews from refugees from Sumgait. I had to transcribe them on a typewriter and give Shakh the text. He’d then give me another one. There were more than fifty such tapes from victims of the events in Sumgait.

I wasn’t able to do all of these tapes of course. I think I did no more than 10 or 12.

Nowadays I understand that Shakh spared me by not giving me the opportunity to speak with the Sumgait refugees. Given that their stories shook me with such force through the cassettes in which I could hear only their voices – no faces, no eyes, no gestures or hand motions – I could only imagine how I would have reacted if I had had to meet the refugees face-to-face.

Moreover, and he said this immediately, he did not intend to use my name in the book. It was clear that he wanted to protect me from any ‘unpleasantness’ with the KGB who followed his every little step.

I took the first cassette, came home, put it on, plugged in my headphones and got the typewriter going.

Over the course of the next three weeks, I lived a strange and unnatural life. In the mornings, I would have breakfast and go to work – to the school where I taught Russian literature – and in the evenings I would sit behind a desk and put on my headphones; and terrible tragedies would come roaring in through the wires.

Women and men’s voices told me horrible stories, stories about how people hid in their basements while thugs and marauders went about their apartments breaking their doors and destroying their homes; stories about how crazed mobs would go from home to home in search of young Armenian women to rape.

Some spoke emotionally, while others spoke with a complete lack of emotion; some even sobbed when they spoke. And all of these stories portrayed unimaginable scenes, completely wild and impossible for the end of the 20th century.

“They stormed into our home, and despite the fact that there was a corpse on the floor, they started plundering our rooms.”

“I remember that when they beat me, when they took off my clothing, I didn’t feel pain or shame, because in that moment all my attention was focused on Karine…”

“My father was out cold. You could see his brains, he had blood in his eyes, he had deep wounds on his head… he had been heavily beaten.”

“One of my brothers lay on the ground in front of the house by the entrance, and the other by the window on the side…”

The stories of the Sumgait refugees which I heard and transcribed in the evenings had a strange effect on me: I practically stopped sleeping. In those three weeks while I was working on the cassettes for Shakh, I forced myself to go to to bed late at night and I would lay there with my eyes wide open, often until it got light outside. Then I’d fall asleep for a few hours. But I had to go to work at the school in the mornings.

The ‘The Sumgait Tragedy: Pogroms Against Armenians in Soviet Azerbaijan’ book was published soon after. In this book, there are only a few of my interviews, and my name is not mentioned among the authors. The majority of the texts that I wrote up were supposed to go in a second book which was never published.

168: Mher Grigoryan appointed Deputy Prime Minister of Armenia

Category
Politics

Based on the proposal of the Prime Minister of Armenia, President Armen Sarkissian signed a decree on May 12 on appointing Mher Grigoryan Deputy Prime Minister.

Mher Grigoryan was born on February 15, 1972.

1997-1999 – head of the Law department at the Central Bank of Armenia

2006-2007 – executive director of Inecobank

2002-2006 – adviser at the World Bank Yerevan Office

2007 – deputy director general of VTB Bank

2011-2018 – chairman of the Board of Ardshinbank.

‘I will do everything for new defense minister to succeed’, says Vigen Sargsyan

Category
Politics

Any person, who has dedicated some part of his life to the country’s defense organization, must be at least inadequate of not dreaming of his next being more effective, Vigen Sargsyan, who announced stepping down from the post of acting defense minister of Armenia on May 8, told reporters at a press conference in the defense ministry, in response to the question what will be the fate of the programs they have launched, and whether there are agreements with the new government to continue them.

“Now together with the staff of the defense ministry we are doing an exercise which has not been done before. We are going to hold a 10-hour briefing for the new minister and his team according to directions, issues and programs. We know the existing legal regulations and actions of each program, the financial sources and their further right use directions, we understand quite well the leadership needed for implementing the programs and will do everything for the new team, the new minister to succeed as it will be our common victory”, Vigen Sargsyan said.

According to him, any person, who dedicated perhaps a day, a week, a month or a year to the country’s defense organization, must be at least inadequate of not dreaming of his next being more effective. “It’s absolutely not a matter of personal ambition, it’s a matter of the security of our society, country, state, as well as that of my family, children and etc. I will do everything regardless of political views for the next minister to definitely succeed. I don’t know to what extent my advice will be needed, but will always be ready to give that advice to all future ministers for not that I know the Army better than they will know while heading the structure a year later, but for the fact that it’s always accumulative information which we need to share”, he said.

Vigen Sargsyan expressed hope that the programs initiated by them will continue. “They are important programs. They are not a result of demonstration of our party or political views, they are programs introduced by more creative approach to have a big army in the small country. I didn’t speak about them during the pre-election programs for a reason, in order not to manipulate them. I have announced about these programs in April, 2017, during the Nation-Army conference after the elections, and this has been done for a reason since I considered them as non-party programs. I have discussed the programs in-detail with all parliamentary factions since I don’t think that the country’s defense must be the parliamentary function of only one party or the majority. And I was expecting a non-partisan approach on this matter, but I didn’t always receive support in the Parliament over which I publicly expressed my opinion and remain in the same opinion – there must be issues in the country at war where society has a consensus aimed at reaching a positive result, rather than searching for a problem”, Sargsyan said.

Eurovision: Armenia’s Sevak Khanagyan concludes first rehearsal

Eurovision TV

Sevak Khanagyan, who represents Armenia at the 2018 Eurovision Song Contest, just finished his first rehearsal on stage. He will represent his country with the song ‘Qami’.

Singer-songwriter Sevak Khanagyan was born in 1987 in Metsavan, Armenia. On the 25th of February he won the Armenian national selection Depi Evratesil with his song Qami, leading both the international jury vote and the televote.

The song Qami is written by Anna Danielyan, who Sevak coached in the 2017 The Voice of Armenia, and by Victoria Maloyan. The music was composed by Sevak Khanagyan himself.

Sevak’s rehearsal starts with calm white lighting, with red and white lights flashing halfway through the song. Sevak is on the stage all by himself, without backing singers or dancers, which adds to the power of the performance.
The impressive prop structure on stage also adds to the strength of Sevaks’ performance, as he stands in the middle of the stage surrounded by monoliths in various heights.

Eurovision.tv caught up with Sevak after his first rehearsal: “It was my first time on the Eurovision stage and I really enjoyed it. I want to thank the whole team and I can not wait to get back on the stage to perform for the audience.”

Armenia will take the stage again for the second round of rehearsals on Friday, 4th of May. Sevak Khanagyn will participate in the first Semi-Final on Tuesday, 8th of May.


https://eurovision.tv/story/armenia-sevak-khanagyan-concludes-first-rehearsal-2018



168: Yerevan police issue warning on appropriate measures if public disturbance escalates

Category
Politics

The Police of Armenia released a statement saying that the right to a peaceful protest, which however is accompanied by public disturbance, is not absolute and can be subject to restrictions – by appropriate actions of the police as required by the given situation, even up to ceasing the rally, the Yerevan Police Department reported.

“Since early morning MP Nikol Pashinyan organized an action of blocking several vitally significant streets of Yerevan – suspending traffic and restricting the constitutional right of hundreds of citizens of free movement.

The police is warning that such actions may give way to crimes endangering the life, health or property of citizens”, the statement in part said.

Acting PM Karapetyan to play role in administration system – Eduard Sharmazanov

Category
Politics

Acting Prime Minister of Armenia Karen Karapetyan will continue playing role in the country’s administration system, but the leader will be the head of the ruling political force Serzh Sargsyan, Vice Speaker of the Armenian Parliament Eduard Sharmazanov told reporters.

“This is the case in all democratic, parliamentary countries. In any parliamentary country where this or that party comes to power, the candidate for the PM is the person who is the leader of that party”, Sharmazanov said.

He didn’t rule out that Karen Karapetyan can continue his activity in the post of first vice prime minister.

Commenting on the view that during Karen Karapetyan’s tenure it was possible to record high economic growth, Sharmazanov said: “By not overshadowing Karen Karapetyan’s role and significance in the administration system, I want to state that linking the achievements only with one person is not fair. Karen Karapetyan is one of the key representatives of our team, but our team has one leader – Serzh Sargsyan”.

On April 9 Armenia transitioned to a parliamentary system. Armen Sarkissian was sworn in as 4th President of Armenia. On the same day the Government resigned. Armenia will elect new Prime Minister on April 17.

MiG participates in ArmHiTec show in Armenia

TASS – Russia’s Defense Technologies Newswire
Friday 11:32 AM GMT
MiG participates in ArmHiTec show
 
 MOSCOW March 30
 
MiG Corporation is participating in the second international arms show ArmHiTec-2018 in Armenia, the company said.
  
MOSCOW, March 30. /TASS-DEFENSE/. MiG Corporation is participating in the second international arms show ArmHiTec-2018 in Armenia, the company said.
 
“The show in Yerevan is a good platform to exchange experience between the leading defense enterprises and to launch cooperation between industrial enterprises of Europe and the Middle East. We expect increased interest in the new MiG-35 fighter jet which has a high export potential,” MiG CEO Ilya Tarasenko said.
 
MiG will present a model of its MiG-35 and hold negotiations with potential partners. Russia has an airbase in Armenia where MiG-29 aircraft are deployed.

President Sargsyan is the best candidate for Prime Minister, says minister Lokyan

Category
Politics

Minister of territorial administration and development Davit Lokyan says incumbent President Serzh Sargsyan is the best candidate for the future Prime Minister.

During the meeting with reporters asked whether he sees President Serzh Sargsyan as the best candidate for the post of the Prime Minister, minister Lokyan said: “Yes, I see. Many factor conditions of today’s Armenia dictate the presence of an experienced person in that post”.

At the same time the minister noted that the right to nominate candidate for the PM fully belongs to the Republican Party which is majority.